Touching upon Foucault's concepts of 'governmentality' and 'biopolitics' as well as his analysis of the panopticon, he elucidated a modern perspective in which we are both members of society - influenced and behaviorally modified by it - and contributors to society, with the power to be influencers of it. There is this give and take. We tend to 'police' ourselves and this is how power the power of the state devolves to the individual subject. This then includes philosophers and theorists whose 'actions' of 'theorizing' become both theoretical and practical. The written word becomes a 'site of contest' in the power struggle of social relations. Thanks so much for this video!
I am a subscriber, in this vein, I am confident that you will cover the Chomsky-Foucault debate. Human Nature: Justice versus Power Noam Chomsky debates with Michel Foucault 1971
I think they’re idea there is that the worker struggle is the Paramount thing to focus on because the workers struggle is what allows all of those other institutions to have a banner to rally under. The colonized the institutionalized, whether that be psychiatric or imprisoned, etc.
I consider myself an intellectual, but I do find too much breeds inaction, which should not occur, unless you are happy eating their cake(s) and staying out the fray -- which in my oppinion, is almost as bad as the /other/ side.
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 25 วันนี้!! "อเล็กซิส vs รีเกียน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/suVr9a6BM2g/mqdefault.jpg)
Touching upon Foucault's concepts of 'governmentality' and 'biopolitics' as well as his analysis of the panopticon, he elucidated a modern perspective in which we are both members of society - influenced and behaviorally modified by it - and contributors to society, with the power to be influencers of it. There is this give and take. We tend to 'police' ourselves and this is how power the power of the state devolves to the individual subject. This then includes philosophers and theorists whose 'actions' of 'theorizing' become both theoretical and practical. The written word becomes a 'site of contest' in the power struggle of social relations. Thanks so much for this video!
Very excited for what’s to come with these Foucault lectures.
Oh I was waiting for this 🔥👍
Oh, yes series on the lectures, let's go
I am a subscriber, in this vein, I am confident that you will cover the Chomsky-Foucault debate.
Human Nature: Justice versus Power
Noam Chomsky debates with Michel Foucault
1971
Already have!
@@TheoryPhilosophy I'll listen to it forthwith. Thanks, as always.
I think they’re idea there is that the worker struggle is the Paramount thing to focus on because the workers struggle is what allows all of those other institutions to have a banner to rally under. The colonized the institutionalized, whether that be psychiatric or imprisoned, etc.
Very insightful once more ! Thank you 😊
Hi! I was wondering if you could share something about your note taking methods for reading these dense texts
Hah, just about to read this conversation. Perfect timing!
Thank you so very much 👌
We are going to sit here on the curb to eat donut's ...now I don't think you can control this if all you do is eat donuts.
6:04
Does it really arrive at "some end', or does it just go on and on forever?
Could you do Baudrillards beef with Foucault book, "Forget Foucault"?
Already have :)
❤❤❤
muy bueno
i know this a theory channel but i cant help myself. ur so cute :dddddd
Hey hey everyone
Å teoretisere er en praksis i seg selv
I consider myself an intellectual, but I do find too much breeds inaction, which should not occur, unless you are happy eating their cake(s) and staying out the fray -- which in my oppinion, is almost as bad as the /other/ side.
What a nice place to be, being simpathetic with maoist...