Paul McCartney will go down as one of the greatest musicians and composers in the history of music. 100 years or even 500 years from now they will be amazed at his wealth of talent he shared. I, for one, feel so lucky to have lived during this time and will always treasure seeing him perform live. Thank you Paul McCartney for enriching all our lives.
“High above this overcrowded place A little blackbird flies through space And all he does Is search for love Love is all that matters in the end Whatever time I have to spend Will be with you Forever true Love is the oldest Secret of the universe Warm as the sun On two iridescent lovers When they discover That now Is all we ever really know The past and future come and go Because they do I'll stay with you. The past and future come and go Because they do I'll stay with you”
I have never heard of this album before. But Paul can do it all! Pop, Country, ballads, fun and kids songs and even Classical! So, if you like Classical music, listen to this amazing masterpiece by the great Sir James Paul McCartney!
I've been a fan of Paul McCartney since I was a very small child. I'm now 52, and this is the first I've ever heard about his classical compositions. I'm stunned! The music is so beautiful and so breathtaking - it's virtually incomprehensible to imagine one person having THIS MUCH talent!
A sign that you're a living legend- you have been a musician for most of your life, and people on youtube are arguing whether you or Mozart are the better composer. I pick Paul myself ;) Great artists don't usually get appreciated until after they are dead. There you go, Paul, ahead of your time, again.
@@dyanapomp like? Mozarts way of making music is the exact opposite of Pauls. There were a lot of "rules" back in the classical era when composing. Paul avoided these rules because he didnt like them. That is an artistic choice and says nothing about quality. So saying mozart and paul are similair doesnt make sense. In what way are they similair? Theyre both humans?
It's impossible to tell what he has really produced because the Beatles and all their art is the creation of a Government intel think-tank know as Tavistock Corp. Theodore Adorno wrote all the songs, at least initially. When Billy Shears replaced the original Paul in '66, the songs got a little more sophisticated, but we don't know that Faux Paul created anything artistic in his whole life. I believe that his orchestra works are really his because they are terrible (student-level compositions).
This is the genius that is Paul McCartney he is the Bach of our day and imagine that he cannot read music wow. How is he able to do this? Incredible musical impresario and busting with talent my God!
Paul sin ninguna duda tiene un don. La Felicidad que este hombre me da a mi y a millones de fieles repartidos por el mundo entero es algo impagable. Dios te bendiga Paul. Gracias por todo. Te Quiero MACCA
Jesus... I could cry with this..... wait.... no, I actually AM crying. God, Paul... will that awsome brain of yours ever dry up?? You are trully an amazing human being.... IDCO if you never read this comment, but thank you for this and every single song, tune, piece and cut you've given us!! You are trully a genius!!
I hope that in the end the people remember Paul also for these, are great pieces of music (with the ocean's kingdom), and I think hese a great composer and he demostrate that can do evry kind of music
Paul McCartney a composé une œuvre magistrale qui égale les plus grands oratorios jusqu'alors écrits. Merci à Takeiteasy de partager un moment si intense.
LCPD9111: are you seriously insane? He COMPOSED this. He composed YESTERDAY, LET IT BE, LONG AND WINDING ROAD, MY LOVE, MAYBE I'M AMAZED, ELEANOR RIGBY, HERE THERE and EVERYWHERE and 200+ others that I can name. He IS THE GREATEST COMPOSER of the 20th CENTURY without question.
Gracias paul , por tu maravillosa musica , las melodías maravillosas melodías que creaste en los beatles , y por crear en mi el amor por ese instrumento maravilloso que es el bajo .
To all the trolls and haters here what have you done significantly with your lives that could even remotely compare to what Paul has contributed to the world not just in music but to worthy charitable causes? I feel sorry for you people...
Well, it is reportedly the same tune reworked... Sea Melody was never officially released, but Paul thought the melody was too good to be kept off the public, so he arranged it into this piece. Nothing wrong with it.
But Mozart wrote what was considered "popular music" in the era. His work was for the masses not for the elite , albeit with clever construction like the famous pandiationic clusters of "This Boy" and "Aeolian cadence" of "Not a Second Time" Yes Mozart probably KNEW he was using the formula , McCartney did NOT. but still there it is.
@Joy Stinson Which is why it's so much more impressive (to me at least) that Paul composed something this magnificent...without any classical training...just his intuitive understanding of how to create stories and emotions through music.
I think you can´t compare Mccartney with Mozart in any way. Of course Mozart is better musician than Mccartney, he had more technique than him, but Mccartney is more than a composer or a bass, guitar, piano player (and another instruments too). He plays his songs, he sings, so he can (and he does) play all of his songs, and all of his band´s instruments. The point is that Mccartney can do things that Mozart couldn´t, but I´m not saying that he is better than Amadeus, but they are very different
Calling Mozart a "classical" composer based on epoch is flat out WRONG. Mozart was the POP star of his time but no one has HEARD Mozart mostly myths of his genius which lacks "libretti". You have partitures which everyone who performs, ads their own little nuisances. Mozarts magic was his "popular" sound the common people"easy listening" with very clever melodic variations. Sounds like McCartney doesnt it? Mozart wrote 600 pieces (supposedly he never wrote drafts) while Paul is up to 700+
20th century yes I agree with that but definitely not all time. There are far superior musicians in my opinion. Mozart is one of them. He is a better composer by far
He actually composed it. He apparently used an early music composition program to work out all the parts since he didn't know how to actually notate the music he imagined.
***** Cylinder recording was invented in 1866. Mozart had been worm food for a long time before that. So had THOUSANDS of other great composers, performers, - and scientists, statesmen, etc. We know these people by their achievements. Libretti for MOST composers of vocal works were written by a poet or other author. Would you throw out every Mass ever written, because the text was not original? How about every operatic depiction of every great work of dramatic literature? The only *myth* here is the veracity of your viewpoint.
This is very nice music. But the question that needs to be asked is how much of this is McCartney and how much is Richard Rodney Bennet, or some other classically trained composer who turned McCartney's tunes into this? McCartney, rather than relying on classically trained composers to turn his songs into classical works should have done his homework and learned music theory. Then he could have written classical music that is genuinely his own. If he had wanted to put forth the effort, he could have hired private tutors to teach him this. Apparently he did not even want to put forth the small amount of effort it takes to read musical notation.
You can watch the docu on the liverpool oratorio.. and you can see that pretty much it is at less 90% macca music. the structure the melodic line etc... the fact that he has a orchestrator doesnt mean it isnt his music..i have use one. and they are great. it allows to free time to concentrate on finding that tune..john williams have use some and nobody says it isnt williams music.
learning to writte and read music pass a certain age is pointless you ear become so good that most score i find just listening to them. writting down music now can be done with midi. and just little cleaning has to be done in order to making it a score.
That may work for a single melody, but this clearly includes more than a melody, since it also includes harmony. To harmonize the melody with anything than the most primitive harmony requires a knowledge of music theory. It is an interesting question whether the rich harmony is from Lennon or Richard Rodney Bennet or some other arranger. Even composers like Mozart did not get their harmony (or counterpoint) purely from instinct and had formal training in the subject.
+Roland Buck I don't agree at all. McCartney harmony can be heard on many of its tune simply on piano voice guitar. Harmony doesn't change cause you have a 50 pieces orchestra...you just divide up the basic one upon instrument group. McCartney has always had a keen harmonic and melodic senses. ..this is is music. anyone that study harmony can harmonize a great melody...but not everyone that study music can come up with a yesterday or here there and everywhere....which you should listen to see some complex chord structure and beautiful harmony Paul written it with Lennon. .and nobody help. you seem to be frustrated with people that have natural talent out of instinct...Andre you a academic who don't have inspiration?
Lennon? What are you smoking? He'd been dead for about 18 years, they'd barely spoken for a decade even then, and Lennon's music theory was even weaker than McCartney's. As the man said, you can watch the documentary to get good idea of how this was turned into a playable score from Paul's computer-written draft score, and you can hear Richard Rodney Bennet and David Matthews themselves tell you the strict limits of their input and how much they admire McCartney's work. You'd realise his harmonic intuition, production and arrangement skill if you knew much of his pop oeuvre, too. He has always had excellent understanding of orchestral instrumentation since the Beatles. Go read George Martin on that score.
Would McCartney dress like Mozart in this modern era. No.Right? .Same way Mozart woldn't use Electric guitars .they didn't exist in that time .What would Mozart be doing if living in this time ? Probably playing Rock or Blues .But did Mozart write Lirycs . No! So everything about Mozart and McCartney is equivalent and Relative
Nice muzak by Sir The Cute One (even at 70, gor'darn it!). McCartney, write some difficult counterpoint, if you.re going to write for an orchestra (and feel free to leave the chorus out - but I guess that's your call as you are THE VOCAL COMPOSING GENIUS OF THE 20TH CENTURY!!!). You owe it to yourself to take acid once again and write organize some sounds to express your inner-most, darkest thoughts and feelings (I know they're in there!). Pleasing your fans be damned!
And how many times did you hear him play? You are going by myth . You are going by scores that have been rehashed to death where he couldn't even write the libretti (lyrics). All we know about Mozart is hearsay What we know by McCartney is factual. So who was a better writer Shakespeare or Edward de Vere?
A Poor Melody and hard to understand words...actually kind of boring...maybe good background music for a movie or in a elevator ...sorry Paul but keep trying...
Paul McCartney is simply unable to write down a single note of music, he knows nothing about harmony, counterpoint, instrumentation or orchestration. He is a mere pop-music empirist. Just as in the case of Gershwin - who would play his 'tunes' on the piano and Joffe would turn them in elaborate, modulating orchestral music - or the Beatles - George Martin he would do the real job -, asserting that McCartney 'wrote' this piece is fairy-tale. Evidently there was one or more highly educated shadow composers to give shape to a few vague ideas he might have had. It's a long way from Hey Jude to mastering music.
Dude...he used a music composition program on a computer to write this thing...entirely because he knew he could fiddle with notes on a keyboard and then listen to how it would sound with the specific instrumentation. He played to his strengths and covered for his weaknesses...and he wrote Standing Stone that way. It was well documented. You just have to watch the BBC documentary about it.
Paul McCartney will go down as one of the greatest musicians and composers in the history of music. 100 years or even 500 years from now they will be amazed at his wealth of talent he shared. I, for one, feel so lucky to have lived during this time and will always treasure seeing him perform live. Thank you Paul McCartney for enriching all our lives.
Paul McCartney a British agent and an imposter. He is not left-handed, he's not a musician, he's not a composer (he's proved that repeatedly).
you're an absolute moron
“High above this overcrowded place
A little blackbird flies through space
And all he does
Is search for love
Love is all that matters in the end
Whatever time I have to spend
Will be with you
Forever true
Love is the oldest
Secret of the universe
Warm as the sun
On two iridescent lovers
When they discover
That now
Is all we ever really know
The past and future come and go
Because they do
I'll stay with you.
The past and future come and go
Because they do
I'll stay with you”
I have never heard of this album before. But Paul can do it all! Pop, Country, ballads, fun and kids songs and even Classical! So, if you like Classical music, listen to this amazing masterpiece by the great Sir James Paul McCartney!
And jazz…
Perfection has a name, and it's name is
Sir Paul McCartney
I love Paul McCartney! I litereally had no idea this existed until right now! HOLY CRAP! I knew there was a reason I loved him!
I just found this as well. I'm in LOVE!
Paul McCartney simply is the Mozart of the 20th and 21st century! ;)
This is so amazing. Paul managed to be one of the greats in classical music as in rock. He's really a gift from the universe to humankind.
WELL PUT
Paul McCartney : Wonderful .Bravo . Encore .Thank you , Sir Paul .
everybody loves paul and his music.
I've been a fan of Paul McCartney since I was a very small child. I'm now 52, and this is the first I've ever heard about his classical compositions. I'm stunned! The music is so beautiful and so breathtaking - it's virtually incomprehensible to imagine one person having THIS MUCH talent!
I keep thinking about how proud his mum would be....
paul can literally do everything..
this piece will be great as a soundtrack for movie
A sign that you're a living legend- you have been a musician for most of your life, and people on youtube are arguing whether you or Mozart are the better composer. I pick Paul myself ;) Great artists don't usually get appreciated until after they are dead. There you go, Paul, ahead of your time, again.
Thats easy.Mozart was not in the BEATLES.
Come on guys be reasonable. Paul is great, but hes no mozart. Comparing this to Mozart is really stupid.
@@StopmotionStudios13 no it's not, there are actually a lot of similarities between them, just think about it
@@dyanapomp like? Mozarts way of making music is the exact opposite of Pauls. There were a lot of "rules" back in the classical era when composing. Paul avoided these rules because he didnt like them. That is an artistic choice and says nothing about quality. So saying mozart and paul are similair doesnt make sense. In what way are they similair? Theyre both humans?
Paul is a genius...
Paul is truly magical. And such a nice, kind guy.
He is
It's impossible to tell what he has really produced because the Beatles and all their art is the creation of a Government intel think-tank know as Tavistock Corp. Theodore Adorno wrote all the songs, at least initially. When Billy Shears replaced the original Paul in '66, the songs got a little more sophisticated, but we don't know that Faux Paul created anything artistic in his whole life. I believe that his orchestra works are really his because they are terrible (student-level compositions).
@@palamambron Troll or just a fucking nutcase ... Which are you. LOL
@@briandonovan1584 WHich are you? I hold a degree in Music Comp. I can't tell fake music when I listen to it.
This is the genius that is Paul McCartney he is the Bach of our day and imagine that he cannot read music wow. How is he able to do this? Incredible musical impresario and busting with talent my God!
Indeed, there is no other word to describe him after listening to this, after listening to all his constributions to music, to life. Genius.
Paul sin ninguna duda tiene un don. La Felicidad que este hombre me da a mi y a millones de fieles repartidos por el mundo entero es algo impagable. Dios te bendiga Paul. Gracias por todo. Te Quiero MACCA
Jesus... I could cry with this..... wait.... no, I actually AM crying. God, Paul... will that awsome brain of yours ever dry up?? You are trully an amazing human being.... IDCO if you never read this comment, but thank you for this and every single song, tune, piece and cut you've given us!! You are trully a genius!!
Una meravella de musica, tant anglesa tan bonica com també sempre coorprenadora i tant sensible.....Wondefaul ...
Paul is fantastic....genius...
TAPED THIS SONG OFF THE RADIO many years ago on cassette tape when it premiered-
so nice to see a video go with it
I hope that in the end the people remember Paul also for these, are great pieces of music (with the ocean's kingdom), and I think hese a great composer and he demostrate that can do evry kind of music
Simply beautiful.
Paul McCartney a composé une œuvre magistrale qui égale les plus grands oratorios jusqu'alors écrits. Merci à Takeiteasy de partager un moment si intense.
He never fails to make you smile, laugh and cry. Such a beautiful song. I love ❤️ Macca.
This piece is the perfect balance between light music and cheap sentimentality.
Bravo, Paul. Bravo.
Great work, Great McCartney!
Best musician ever.
I adore this beauty!
That is so beautiful
This is what a man with a good heart gives to this world. Thank you 🙏🏼 Sir Paul, for the joy you make.
Su música logra tocar el alma...sin duda una melodía hermosa
Beautiful music
This is "Sea Melody" from Rupert the Bear. All the music from Rupert is amaaaaazing.
MONUMENTAL !
Extraordinaria !....como todas las composiciones de Paul...
LCPD9111: are you seriously insane? He COMPOSED this. He composed YESTERDAY, LET IT BE, LONG AND WINDING ROAD, MY LOVE, MAYBE I'M AMAZED, ELEANOR RIGBY, HERE THERE and EVERYWHERE and 200+ others that I can name. He IS THE GREATEST COMPOSER of the 20th CENTURY without question.
pkgannon hey Jude bro :p
Gracias paul , por tu maravillosa musica , las melodías maravillosas melodías que creaste en los beatles , y por crear en mi el amor por ese instrumento maravilloso que es el bajo .
Wonderful!
Que melodia mas hermosa Inposible no emocionarse al escucharla
How beautiful
Thank you for this, thank you, thank you🍒
I would like to have Paul as my friend. I love you, Paul. From Brazil
Spectacular ..
To all the trolls and haters here what have you done significantly with your lives that could even remotely compare to what Paul has contributed to the world not just in music but to worthy charitable causes? I feel sorry for you people...
simplemente maravilloso
Proud to be. would be an understatement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
😍😍😍😍
When I saw this on tv when it was on (when I saw Linda - I cried because she had died prior to this being on TV)
MARAVILHOSO
Quest'uomo è un mito
This is very under-rated, sadly.
It's underrated because it's boring.
Well, it is reportedly the same tune reworked... Sea Melody was never officially released, but Paul thought the melody was too good to be kept off the public, so he arranged it into this piece. Nothing wrong with it.
Beautiful! I wonder if he's ever composed music for any films?
The Family Way in the 60s, with George Martin.
And the cartoon Rupert.
Live and let die.
James bond film
Lake House ”this never happened before"
Compare the melody of this piece with his (unreleased?) Sea Melody - also on TH-cam.
But Mozart wrote what was considered "popular music" in the era. His work was for the masses not for the elite , albeit with clever construction like the famous pandiationic clusters of "This Boy" and "Aeolian cadence" of "Not a Second Time" Yes Mozart probably KNEW he was using the formula , McCartney did NOT. but still there it is.
@Joy Stinson Which is why it's so much more impressive (to me at least) that Paul composed something this magnificent...without any classical training...just his intuitive understanding of how to create stories and emotions through music.
I wonder if he will write a opera
Was this the premier?
I was already well convinced that Sir McCartney was a genius. But this, this makes the word "genius" sound like an insult.
Damn , now I have to get married again so i can play this as the bride walks to the alter and every one gets teary eyes.
It seems quite similar to nessun dorma by Puccini
EPIC spleeah @5:02
@pkgannon Do you realise there were no such things as record sales or album sales
I think you can´t compare Mccartney with Mozart in any way. Of course Mozart is better musician than Mccartney, he had more technique than him, but Mccartney is more than a composer or a bass, guitar, piano player (and another instruments too). He plays his songs, he sings, so he can (and he does) play all of his songs, and all of his band´s instruments. The point is that Mccartney can do things that Mozart couldn´t, but I´m not saying that he is better than Amadeus, but they are very different
Calling Mozart a "classical" composer based on epoch is flat out WRONG. Mozart was the POP star of his time but no one has HEARD Mozart mostly myths of his genius which lacks "libretti". You have partitures which everyone who performs, ads their own little nuisances. Mozarts magic was his "popular" sound the common people"easy listening" with very clever melodic variations. Sounds like McCartney doesnt it? Mozart wrote 600 pieces (supposedly he never wrote drafts) while Paul is up to 700+
20th century yes I agree with that but definitely not all time. There are far superior musicians in my opinion. Mozart is one of them. He is a better composer by far
did paul actually write this music ,or was his name just fronting it ?
He actually composed it. He apparently used an early music composition program to work out all the parts since he didn't know how to actually notate the music he imagined.
Category SPORT?? ;)
***** Cylinder recording was invented in 1866. Mozart had been worm food for a long time before that. So had THOUSANDS of other great composers, performers, - and scientists, statesmen, etc. We know these people by their achievements. Libretti for MOST composers of vocal works were written by a poet or other author. Would you throw out every Mass ever written, because the text was not original? How about every operatic depiction of every great work of dramatic literature?
The only *myth* here is the veracity of your viewpoint.
One of the greatest musicians yes but not composers.
Stupid comparsions deserv no coments... What’s more important: The wheel or a computer? Please, keep the good sense...
This is very nice music. But the question that needs to be asked is how much of this is McCartney and how much is Richard Rodney Bennet, or some other classically trained composer who turned McCartney's tunes into this? McCartney, rather than relying on classically trained composers to turn his songs into classical works should have done his homework and learned music theory. Then he could have written classical music that is genuinely his own. If he had wanted to put forth the effort, he could have hired private tutors to teach him this. Apparently he did not even want to put forth the small amount of effort it takes to read musical notation.
You can watch the docu on the liverpool oratorio.. and you can see that pretty much it is at less 90% macca music. the structure the melodic line etc... the fact that he has a orchestrator doesnt mean it isnt his music..i have use one. and they are great. it allows to free time to concentrate on finding that tune..john williams have use some and nobody says it isnt williams music.
learning to writte and read music pass a certain age is pointless you ear become so good that most score i find just listening to them. writting down music now can be done with midi. and just little cleaning has to be done in order to making it a score.
That may work for a single melody, but this clearly includes more than a melody, since it also includes harmony. To harmonize the melody with anything than the most primitive harmony requires a knowledge of music theory. It is an interesting question whether the rich harmony is from Lennon or Richard Rodney Bennet or some other arranger. Even composers like Mozart did not get their harmony (or counterpoint) purely from instinct and had formal training in the subject.
+Roland Buck I don't agree at all. McCartney harmony can be heard on many of its tune simply on piano voice guitar. Harmony doesn't change cause you have a 50 pieces orchestra...you just divide up the basic one upon instrument group. McCartney has always had a keen harmonic and melodic senses. ..this is is music. anyone that study harmony can harmonize a great melody...but not everyone that study music can come up with a yesterday or here there and everywhere....which you should listen to see some complex chord structure and beautiful harmony Paul written it with Lennon. .and nobody help. you seem to be frustrated with people that have natural talent out of instinct...Andre you a academic who don't have inspiration?
Lennon? What are you smoking? He'd been dead for about 18 years, they'd barely spoken for a decade even then, and Lennon's music theory was even weaker than McCartney's. As the man said, you can watch the documentary to get good idea of how this was turned into a playable score from Paul's computer-written draft score, and you can hear Richard Rodney Bennet and David Matthews themselves tell you the strict limits of their input and how much they admire McCartney's work. You'd realise his harmonic intuition, production and arrangement skill if you knew much of his pop oeuvre, too. He has always had excellent understanding of orchestral instrumentation since the Beatles. Go read George Martin on that score.
lawrence foster...roman
Is this really the genius of Paul or the genius of the guy who's actually orchestrated the music, it would be the second one.
Genius of Paul
Would McCartney dress like Mozart in this modern era. No.Right? .Same way Mozart woldn't use Electric guitars .they didn't exist in that time .What would Mozart be doing if living in this time ? Probably playing Rock or Blues .But did Mozart write Lirycs . No! So everything about Mozart and McCartney is equivalent and Relative
d
Nice muzak by Sir The Cute One (even at 70, gor'darn it!). McCartney, write some difficult counterpoint, if you.re going to write for an orchestra (and feel free to leave the chorus out - but I guess that's your call as you are THE VOCAL COMPOSING GENIUS OF THE 20TH CENTURY!!!). You owe it to yourself to take acid once again and write organize some sounds to express your inner-most, darkest thoughts and feelings (I know they're in there!). Pleasing your fans be damned!
he is nowhere near on the same level as mozart
And how many times did you hear him play? You are going by myth . You are going by scores that have been rehashed to death where he couldn't even write the libretti (lyrics). All we know about Mozart is hearsay What we know by McCartney is factual. So who was a better writer Shakespeare or Edward de Vere?
Yes but Mozart is the greater musical genius
Pity he still can't read music. He should stick to what he does best. This kind of thing is just embarrassing.
David Howell here's my take on people perusing you're skeptical whining's wa wa wa you are welcome
A Poor Melody and hard to understand words...actually kind of boring...maybe good background music for a movie or in a elevator ...sorry Paul but keep trying...
for sure !!!
Hard to understand words falls on the conductor and the singers, not the composer.
This music is terrible. This is fake. Paul is an impersonator. An intelligence agent, not an artist at all.
So why you are here????????? Nobody forced you to listen.
@@tolaga9172 Why would you choose to listen to this horrible drivel? You must be totally ignorant of who the Beatles were and who Paul McCartney was.
@@palamambron Nope.
@@palamambron Shut your ignorant piehole.
Paul McCartney is simply unable to write down a single note of music, he knows nothing about harmony, counterpoint, instrumentation or orchestration. He is a mere pop-music empirist. Just as in the case of Gershwin - who would play his 'tunes' on the piano and Joffe would turn them in elaborate, modulating orchestral music - or the Beatles - George Martin he would do the real job -, asserting that McCartney 'wrote' this piece is fairy-tale. Evidently there was one or more highly educated shadow composers to give shape to a few vague ideas he might have had. It's a long way from Hey Jude to mastering music.
FROM CANADA IT S ALL IN THE BRAIN EVEN IF YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO WRITE THE NOTE ITS LIKE EINSTEIN ALL IN THE BRAIN
Watch the documentary first, then comment....
Dude...he used a music composition program on a computer to write this thing...entirely because he knew he could fiddle with notes on a keyboard and then listen to how it would sound with the specific instrumentation. He played to his strengths and covered for his weaknesses...and he wrote Standing Stone that way. It was well documented. You just have to watch the BBC documentary about it.
McCartney knows nothing about harmony!? 🤣
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Next time do more research because you’re very ignorant
Paul is a genius