The (activist) ECHR is not empowered to overrule national decisions or annul national laws. The Court is not responsible for the execution of its judgments.
No serious debate has been conducted between climate experts people are only allowed to hear one side of the climate change argument and tells me a lot when one side is silenced.
Since I started hearing this thing about 1980s at school I'd call it a "very slow climate transformation process" instead of just climate change which means an instant difference between a while ago and now. But I know it's big business anyway
What a complete pile of steaming scat. So now any country can sue any ither country for not living up to what IT thinks is the right standard? How far below that standard can they be sued? One megaton? 2?
Climate change in the most part is good for your health and for the vegetation. Climate change is bad because of the economic burden of each person paying one extra dollar a year if we were to do nothing. That and the rhetoric. That rhetoric is causing mental trauma. In some cases PTSD. What is also bad is pollution. For some reason that is now part of climate change when really pollution, not climate change, should be the priority.
@@BlueTeamRedTeam I never said CO2 was pollution. When you look up climate change you see pollution as a small entry. If CO2 was ever classified as pollution that gives governments free reign to force their own citizens to stop breathing.
A few billionaires shouldn’t own and control the means of production, distribution and exchange. Workers make the world run, workers should run the world.🌎🌱
Yeah! Into the ground as they have no idea how to run a hot-dog stand let alone the means of production they think they're entitled to. If workers truly wanted to own the means of production, they can save their money and start a business.
The (activist) ECHR is not empowered to overrule national decisions or annul national laws.
The Court is not responsible for the execution of its judgments.
No serious debate has been conducted between climate experts people are only allowed to hear one side of the climate change argument and tells me a lot when one side is silenced.
They must have had a long walk to France.
Foolishness.
How come nobody ever says climate change hurts white men? 😆
If the WEF meets in Switzerland then why aren’t they the leader???
First of all Artificial weather must be stopped
Everyone knows this is rubbish.
My pfp shows the real ecological terrorist of the world
Absolute foolishness...
Discusting
Since I started hearing this thing about 1980s at school I'd call it a "very slow climate transformation process" instead of just climate change which means an instant difference between a while ago and now. But I know it's big business anyway
😂😂😂 oh the sun monster 😂😂😂
The record doesn't go back very far.
China must be shaking in its boots! 😂😂😂
Go after China, India and the USA…..the three worst offenders!
Just remember who does China's accounting...
Funny how much of the money thrown at the weather winds up in the pockets of guys with little hats...
as per usual
This is some woke a$$ bulls!+.
Foolishness
What a complete pile of steaming scat. So now any country can sue any ither country for not living up to what IT thinks is the right standard? How far below that standard can they be sued? One megaton? 2?
Climate change in the most part is good for your health and for the vegetation. Climate change is bad because of the economic burden of each person paying one extra dollar a year if we were to do nothing. That and the rhetoric. That rhetoric is causing mental trauma. In some cases PTSD. What is also bad is pollution. For some reason that is now part of climate change when really pollution, not climate change, should be the priority.
CO2 isn’t pollution
@@BlueTeamRedTeam I never said CO2 was pollution. When you look up climate change you see pollution as a small entry. If CO2 was ever classified as pollution that gives governments free reign to force their own citizens to stop breathing.
And now the swiss are leaving this nonsense behind. Exit stage right.
Ridiculous!!!
Please. Stop.
It all began with 🍎🐍
Is too little too late, this should have been done back in 1980s.
A few billionaires shouldn’t own and control the means of production, distribution and exchange. Workers make the world run, workers should run the world.🌎🌱
The world should own Uranus.
1.
Move to North Korea.
Yeah! Into the ground as they have no idea how to run a hot-dog stand let alone the means of production they think they're entitled to. If workers truly wanted to own the means of production, they can save their money and start a business.
@@Another-Address
And Yugoslavia in the 80's actually had what the poster is advocating. Needless to say it didn't work out too well.
Respect, very right decision
Their right, their future ,all of them have one foot in the grave ,not much of future ,😂😂😂😂
Absolutely laughable. The ECHR is not fit for purpose.
Paid professional victims.