Without doubt this is the best advice given, and sharing examples of how a different focal lengths look, I'm new to this style of photography and struggled with various lens, so going to stick to one for the next 6 months (35mm) and see where tha takes me thanks for a great helpfull vlog.
Very helpful advise as I am at the point of deciding whether to get the Q3 28mm or the Q3 43 for street photo but some portrait capability and for street night photography. I presume the Q3 28 is a better choice even if the 48 is a better lens I am in such a trouble deciding.
I love that 28mm keeps me humble. So much room to fill. I have to get close to subjects to bring interest. 50mm is too easy for me. The compression and angle of view makes it easier to compose an image but 28 pushes me and is more enjoyable.
Depending on what I'm out for when I'm on a street to take pictures, there are three preferred lenses for me (for full format cameras): 1. 28-30mm set on hyperfocal distance for candid shots 2. 70-90mm f1.8 or f2 Macro for street portraits and detail shots 3. 24mm shift lens for architecture If there would be 24-70mm f2 shift lens, that would be the one best street photography lens for me.
Some of the best lens advice I've ever heard, with a series of outstanding images to back up many of the points you have made. I'm not a street photographer, but 28mm is near enough my favourite focal length and so I've probably consumed almost every Leica Q2 video ever shared. It's extraordinary to me that people testing that particular camera, and in some cases having already bought it, seem unsure or lukewarm about 28mm and I can only conclude that they've got a lot more money than sense. But I dream on anyway and your artistry and common sense helps to fuel my photography journey. So thank you and your partner very much indeed.
You are very kind, Michael. I think 28 is a lens which needs to have some time spent with it. I was very surprised when Leica launched the Q series with a 28mm lens as standard. 35mm would have made more sense but would that have impacted on sales of the M series cameras and lenses?? I think so, and with the M's being more expensive and you need to buy a lens too, I can sort of understand why they went for 28mm. The Q is a safe Leica for TH-camrs, it looks cool, and it's basically a big point and shoot and it has the all important LCD screen which they can use to show how they are shooting in their POV videos!!
@@WalkLikeAlice ... I went with my Leica M11 into a busy Mumbai market to shoot. ( I am an Indian btw ), I just ambled into a shop of women's bags and the shopkeeper said, no cameras allowed, I said I am not shooting anything. " we dont allow TH-camrs into the shop " he said !... the pov video daemon! every knows when you are doing a Pov. And TH-camrs have subsumed the Photographer as the beast on the street !
@@neoaureus I’m not sure what this has to do with this video. But I agree with you that the trend for TH-camrs and POV has made people more aware of street photographers.
I have always liked a 50mm. I use 35 more now for walking sidewalks where things are closer. My GRiiix has a 40 which is great. I also throw a tiny olympus 40-150(80-300 eq) in the bag for when I just want to sit on a bench in an open area and make some shots while relaxing. The 80mm eq on the zoom also works walking around for a change of pace and shooting window decorations and across intersections. Some street safari partners use a short 24-80 zoom all the time. In the street classes I teach I have students use either a 35 or 50 for all the class so they get a feel for it.
So glad I found this channel! I used to love your comments and advice on the old (DWF) Digital Wedding Forum when I first became a wedding photographer 20+ years ago!
35mm is classics and irs clesr why it's a typical number one choice. The photos are flat, however still not wide angled and distrited somehow. 50mm for someone is too close. 28mm is too wide, I've tried to make some photos ans simply was struggled what to photo because aimply wverybting was in the viewfinder, jt was too much too. I still think the best is juggling between 50 and 35
What a wonderful video! The subject is something I've been struggling with lately and after viewing this, I can't wait to stick with one focal length for a good amount of time and see how I develop. Also looking forward to watching many more of your videos.
Valuable advice, Jeff. I've come to use a 28 mm lens for most street photography. But I also enjoy hunting for shots which favor a 50 mm lens wide open at f 1.4. I often enjoy shallow depth of field. I've bought all my gear locally and my dealer will lend a lens or camera body for the weekend so I can see how comfortable I am with it.
I enjoyed your video, thanks for taking the time to speak on this and share examples. For me, I feel most comfortable with a 50mm. I find myself gravitating to it for the way it handles proportions. When I want to include more in the scene and get a more traditional street photo, I’ll use a 35mm. But I ultimately prefer the way the 50mm renders at the end of the day. All that being said, like you mentioned, it comes down to the photographer and how they see the world.
I grew up with a 50mm. I’ve had more 50 than any other lens and I agree, there is nothing better for rendering proportions. I still use mine a lot for landscapes of all things. I like the natural perspective.
I think it's best to rent all the lenses. Some photo shops provide them for rent (for a certain time, for example, for a day or hours). It won’t brake your bank! I’ve tried fix lenses, wide angle like 10-20mm, but finally understood that I don’t go lower than 40mm but I will go for 100mm or even 200mm, so my choice was Nikkor 55-200mm.
Without a doubt the best summary of how people should choose a lens (and why) I have come across. The too many lenses is a rabbit hole of wasted time - speaking from hard earned experience. I've settled on a 24 Elmar for my walk around lens.
@@WalkLikeAlice I shot with the 21mm for a year and =found it a tad too wide too often great lens though so I shifted up to the 28 and shot for a couple of years - I can understand why Leica loves the 28mm - my preferred distance is 2-3meters so the 24 gives me more width but not as much as the 21. I guess the only thing you may have mentioned in your video is the focusing methods you both use to get your shots.....
Great to hear your thoughts. Been shooting a 35mm lens for the last 18 months exclusively but considering moving to 28 this year for ease of zone focusing and more context in my shots
Adapting to the 28mm focal length on my Leica Q was not easy after using interchangeables and mostly the 35mm on my cropped sensor Fuji X-T4! But the Q and the fixed lens now feels so natural now. Also, the high image quality of the full frame Leica means that if I simply cannot physically move to the position to give me the ideal framing, I still have the option to crop and get a useable final image. The physical tab for manual focusing on the Q is an important feature too. Using one lens also means I don’t have to remember which way the distance scale works so manual focusing can become quite intuitive.
@@WalkLikeAlice Yes. It's all your fault! I took the majority of my pics on it last year. Hugh Brownstone made me realise I'm not a landscape photographer so street it is for me and the Q so often delivers better pictures than I thought I'd captured which is a joy!
Great food for thought. I have used a 35 for years capturing about 90% of my street images. COVID nearly stopped me from my hobby. Now to gain some inspiration and to get back at it, I am trying a 50mm until such time as when I feel comfortable getting in closer and wider to my scenes. I admit I carry too much gear out on the street. For now 35 and 50 lenses until I get well back into the groove of old. Also will try to blur more backgrounds to help focus on main subject.
Hi Jeff. I've been shooting with the Leica M (film and digital) for the past 30 years and I'm still learning something new each day. Wise words indeed, from you on street shooting and I appreciate it very much. I've been following your channel for quite a while and love both of your pictures. Thanks and take care
I use a Sigma 100mm-400mm lens for street photography. I don’t want to engage with people, and I don’t want to taint the scene with invading people’s space. I like the tight, no environment photograph-head and shoulders-is good enough for me and it’s my shooting style.
Excellent advice. Ten years or so ago I decided to pursue street/documentary style and I had a 28-70 zoom. For the longest time, all my street photographs were turning out to be street portraits. It was terrible. I almost quit. Then I got a 50 and put an end to the madness. These days I still take multiple lenses with me, or a zoom on rare occasions, but I have trained my “mind’s eye” and I am disciplined about the focal length I deem appropriate for the environment I am in at that time. I choose it according to the mood/area/subject and don’t touch it until I move on to some other location, where activity/subjects/interest are different enough that it warrants a shorter or longer focal length. Do I miss shots because I have the wrong lens on? Oh yes, all the time. I learned to be ok with letting those go. And I can always come back tomorrow, using the different focal length, and that just adds to the fun and wonder of the streets.
I like your reply. Like you, I don’t think there is anything wrong with carrying more than one lens, provided of course you stick to just one for the purpose you set out to achieve! Maybe a 35mm for use on the street but if I’m in London and want to take photos in the Underground, I may opt for an 18mm (both on a crop sensor camera ).
Incidentially my focal length is also 28mm on full format if I feel comfortable with the envirionment and 35 mm if I prefer to keep a bit more of a distance to people. It may be also dictated by the environment. I stopped using wider lenses because the distortion makes them somewhat difficult to use even when you are not in hurry.
@@WalkLikeAlice Kudos to you, because you obviously mastered this but I failed to make it work for me most of the time. Maybe I should give it another try.
When doing my urban outings with my Olympus Pen F I will quite often take two lenses but rarely change sticking with the one for the day. I have three that I which alternate between Olympus 12 and 17 mm which usually live with that camera in that bag I might switch out one and put my 25mm 1.4 lumix leica if I feel that just a bit more reach or distance from what I am photographing. I did try with my 56mm (112) if wanting to put in 35mm terms but was to long.
@@WalkLikeAlice not had a chance to try the 12mm maybe one day! Also have shot with the 15mm but think the Olympus lenses work better if needing to manual focus
I have some photographer experience and do photo shoot direction but want to get into street photography. I found this exceptionally helpful and inspriing. Thank you, I have subscribed.
My main street setup is a Leica M240 and CV 35/1.4 Nokton. I have tried my 28/2 Ultron II, but found it to wide for me. I did enjoy shooting street with a 90/2.8 Elmarit-M this past weekend.. Thanks for the chat...
I think the 28mm, although popular, is a really difficult lens to work with. It takes a lot of perseverance. I was surprised that Leica used a 28mm in the Q series.
Love this channel Jeff. What are you doing on Sunday? May I recommend the Liverpool ChinaTown new year celebrations? It’s a wonderful street event. I’ll be the one with the 50mm! K.O. 12 noon
Great video. I'm currently trying to decide between the 23mm F2 and 27mm F2.8 for Fuji APS-C. Although close in focal length it seems like quite a distinct choice!
I just bought the Fuji XT5 and the 23mm f2 lens. Switching from micro four thirds and looking forward to shooting with a prime lens again. Heading out with it for the first time this weekend.
I brought that lens along with my X-T1 on a trip to Europe many years ago. Great images that I still enjoy viewing today. You are going to love that combo!
Olympus Pen F with 8-18mm Olympus lens and also a Leica M8 with an 18mm Carl Zieiss, both cameras are black and I’ve blacked out the white lettering on both cameras, I have a silver Leica M9 but that shows up more and find it attracts a bit more attention, I use the Leica M9 for social occasions, usually fitted with a Leica 24mm lens.
SUch a great video. It makes me realize that right now i see the world in 50mm terms and If I want to go to a 35mm or 28mm I will need to learn to see a bit differently. Also, so jealous you got to meet the great Salgado, that's a great anecdote about his pancake lens.
This, like all your videos I’ve seen so far, is so amazingly helpful and wonderful! It’s so positive and affirming. It’s just magnificent and I really appreciate them. Too many times I’d see videos and would just want to give up. With y’all, it’s just the opposite. I feel more enthusiastic to pull out the camera that has been sitting idle for far too long.
I’ve always loved the 28mm. I’ve gravitated between that and the 35mm and have gotten interesting work with both, but I love the unique look a 28mm brings to street photography. Just discovered your channel, and have now subscribed. Love the reference to Salgado, a god of photography in my book
Shooting street pix today is very much like doing press work in the 80's, before zooms... I use 2 bodies with a wide (usually a 35mm) and a short tele (usually a 75mm) The trick to avoid the indecision is to look at each picture opportunity and decide on the fly which body I need to take it... Obviously changing lenses is not a possibility, but deciding between 2 bodies in less of a problem... I'm always looking for pictures and anticipating where it will be.. during this process I can chose my lens and be ready if it breaks down as I hope... This is how we worked in press photography before fast zooms took over...
Thumbs Up! Great video taking the snootiness out of picking expensive fast glass out of decision process. Also appreciated your comments about how to choose a focal length that works for each of us based on how we're editing and our comfort level is in approaching a situation.
@@SilatShooter for me personally, a zoom was always a source of frustration. It caused me to stand in one place and use the lens to find a photo. It was also slow to use, heavy etc. But we’ve all seen what Steve McCurry does with one!!
hi Jeff, second time around seeing this video : still triggering interesting thoughts on my side... I am 6 foot 4 and I tend to shoot with the camera positionned under my chin (with a 21 or 28 mm), sometimes its more of a move : bringing the camera under my chin : clic , contiuning and bringing the finder to my eye and clic again, under 1 ou 2 seconds timeframe. Additionally, I find distance from subject dictate my lens choice and environnement dictate distance : in a fair or setting with crowds :1-5 feet (21mm), small town with less people = 10-15 feet (35mm or 50 mm), the 28mm is really an all-arounder and fits almost all scenarios. This is not mathematical as you know and like you said in the video : the personnality of the photographer plays a huge role. cheers to Sarah and you !
I still love using my Lumix GX80. My fave lens for street is the Leica Summilux 15mm 1.7 ( 30mm equivalent.) I've got used to it, and just love that lens.
Great advice. When I started I thought I was a 35mm guy because everyone said I should be. Then when processing I realized I was consistently cropping to 50mm range and it felt wasteful tossing away all that sensor space. Since then I shoot 90% with a 50 and much happier
Last week I went to see Tom Wood exhibition in Liverpool , his cameras are on display including the lenses. He used a Leica 50mm Summitar and the Russian lens Jupiter 8 50mm lens. His B&W street work was really impressive.
Thanks for the reply. I hadn’t come across Tom’s work before. Just spent a very pleasurable ten minutes looking at his site. It’s obvious he found his perfect focal length.
I shot with film M`s for 30 years (still do at times) using 40 or 50 .Today I often go out with my digital CL with either a 35 or just a 50 .I went a few years using a various Ricoh GRD`s and rapidly got used to the 28fl. Now I think conditions on the street have changed in the 30 years since I started. People are more socially aware of cameras and that seems to necessitate using longer fl`s than previously .... perhaps. It depends whether you talking "walk about street" or street events I guess . Nice content by the way .
I’ve heard this a few times from photographers. The idea that you need to be further away. Whatever you feel comfortable with is the correct choice. But I remember reading an article about Cartier-Bresson and his work in America. He said something on the lines of him having to forsake his 50mm for a 35mm because everything was so big and busy.
great advices in this video; for me, its 40mm if I have to choose one. Once in awhile, I will go full Saul Leiter with my 135mm, just to change and shake myself....
@@denislaroche3957 For his small format stuff, I believe he did. There are a number of TV docs where he's using digital for when he would normally use 35mm. His landscapes he still shoots on medium/large format film.
For me, when I purchased the Leica Apo 35 Summicron it was a religious revelation. Outrageous price but wonderful results. Had the close focus Summilux version before and never liked it greatly. Found an Apo sat on a dealer shelf and a deal was done. Don’t miss the f1.4 at all on an M11-P and it produces amazing quality.
Truly. I really cannot put into words just why either. I’ve been a photographer for over 40 years and yet I cannot possibly explain the abilities of that lens. It’s magic. That’s the only possibility!
Just picked a new hobby and as a beginner on budget...great advice on lens and cameras. Hoping to use Nikon 1 J5 10-30mm and stay on course to be good as using it. Cheers
Nice and useful video.. I have a 24-70 lens I have a 50 lens and a Nikon 28-300 lens. I use the 50 for street photography and it is comfortable because it works with an aperture of 1.8. The 28-300 lens is comfortable with controlling the zoom, but it needs light, so it is not good for street photography at night.
I used to use a 28mm then moved to a 24mm my friend used a 21mm, and I now use a 16mm to 35 mm Zoom. I also used a pair of Olympus 35 RC cameras sometimes which are a rangefinder with a 42mm lens.
Hi. Originally I played with the idea to try a Tamron 35-150. But this lens is huge and heavy and expensiv. So i got the idea to take my Sony 24-105G and mounted it instead on my A7RIII ,on my Sony 6700 (APSC). So the focal length is 36-160 and the combi is still transportable, good to handle and I have nearly all relevant focal length at least for street f. in one objectiv. Even the trees on the top of the opposite mountain in 1Kilometer distance are still sharp. I am happy with "my" solution.
I'm very introvert, not that much shy, had an powershot câmera and love the focal length, almost 200mm, few years went by and i love wide angles, rn i have an cheap 25mm lens on a apsc body, 38mm ish on ff, love the range, looking into an 18mm to try out that 28mm wide angle
In late 2020, after a trip to Italy shooting around the towns and villages with a 50mm attached to a D850 (normally used for landscapes), I caught the “street” bug, was subsequently afflicted with “Leica lust”, sold a kidney, and supplemented my Nikon DSLR kit with an M10R plus a 35mm summicron. I’ve since added a slightly bigger camera bag, a 75mm f1.5 Voigtlander and a 50mm summilux both of which as it turns out, rarely leave the bag in favour of the 35mm which seems to have become superglued to the camera. Now, thanks in part to your channel, I find myself seeking confirmation bias that I should add the 28mm Elmar to my collection. Don’t feel bad, yours is a great channel. Blame Sarah, I’m sure she won’t mind. Anyway, thanks for the channel. Your editing/advisory videos are useful and interesting and, in this latest case, has left me wanting to go through my photos to analyse how much butchery I perform with the crop tool, and whether I’m adjusting my shots to fit a lens (a 28mm of course) that I don’t have. Perhaps when the weather warms up, you and Sarah might share a few more walk-about videos where you somehow make British seaside towns look like places I’d like to visit. They (your videos I mean) are a breath of fresh air. Thanks again.
Thank you, Mark. You are very kind. I think the Leica M just feels right with a 35mm, you can see the framelines properly and the viewfinder magnification suits the focal length. The 28 will need a supplementary viewfinder to work well and with the M10R, zone focusing will be harder to get right as the resolution is so high. I would stick with the 35mm. There isn't a huge difference between 35 and 28 and you already have a great lens.
@@WalkLikeAlice Many thanks for the reply. I couldn’t help checking in the user guide what you said about the 28mm frame lines with the M10R. It says…“The relevant bright-line frame will light up in the combinations 35 mm + 135 mm, 50 mm + 75 mm or 28 mm + 90 mm when lenses with a focal length of 28 (Elmarit as of serial number 2 411 001), 35, 50, 75, 90 and 135 mm are used.” As I said… confirmation bias wherever I can find it, but I’ll endeavour to heed your, what I know to be sound advice and spend my money going to places using my Leica rather than feeding my kit fixation.. What can I say…“My name is Mark, and I own a Leica” Have a good weekend. Cheers.
@@marksabin6336 In fairness to Leica, the 28 framelines will show up in the viewfinder, but whether you can see them clearly or not is another matter. The viewfinder mag on the M10 is 0.73 I believe. Unless you push your eye really hard into the viewfinder, you struggle to see them. If you wear glasses, you've no chance!! You can always check by moving the lever next to the lens mount, that will pop each set of framelines into the window for you.
Fantastic channel Jeff. Thank you. I’m trying to improve my street photography. It’s between an autofocus 35m 1.4 and manual CV 40mm Nokton for me. I need to work at estimating focus distance as focusing through the view finder slows me down. Do you think it’s worth the effort? As a leica shooter I imagine you do? A possible future video on manual focus tips?! I don’t miss a shot on the autofocus lens but the CV is smaller and somehow more fun.
I use a Nikon full frame. I bought a 40mm a year and a half ago. I think it's a good compromise between the 35mm and 50mm. I love that lens. I bought a 28mm at Christmas. It may not be the sharpest lens but I really like the focal length. I can get closer to people and still have enough of the scene in the frame to put in context where they are. 40mm is better for things across the street from you or further down the street from you. I recently bought an old Canon AE-1. It came with a 50mm lens. I found a 28mm that was like new on fb market for $50. That included shipping. I grew up with point and shoot film cameras but never an SLR. I always wanted one. I picked up the camera for $85. So I only have a little over $100 in it. I've spent that much on film and processing of not more. I think I've shot 7 rolls through it since April. I still prefer my mirrorless cameras but I think shooting film with an all manual camera makes you slow down and think about the shot because you don't want to waste a bad shot since there's only 36 to a roll. I think shooting film will help my street photography with a digital camera.
Very well put together information. Thank you for getting straight to the point(s), no infuriating waffle. Very informative and thought provoking video. Thank you 🙂✌️
Most of the time I shoot with a 35mm lens but also carry a 50mm both small compact lenses and a small camera body with a couple of batteries the second lens in a pocket just subbed the channel thanks.......
Excellent thoughts here. Usually 2 bodies, 2 lenses - 28 & 40 (or lately, a 60). This most likely influenced by years of using 2 Minolta CLE for travel. Single body 35 (or 40). Best
Thank you!! I've often thought about using two bodies, but I always think it draws attention to me. I'm not sure if it actually does, but it's that little bit of doubt which stops me going down that route.
@@WalkLikeAlice Carrying 2 bodies ‘can’ be discreet. Typically for me it’s a 75/25 ratio. Having a main body (75) at the ready with a 2nd body (25) in a small bag, clipped (not zipped) for easy access. A point & shoot works as a second body as well; small & non-threatening. A Minilux (40mm) and a CLE/28mm is a brilliantly discrete combo. Enjoy your (& Sarah’s) work. Cheers from the Pacific NW, USA.
Fantastic video as always. I find myself juggling between the 35mm and 28mm. I shoot Street mostly in NYC so its always the 28mm as I dive into the massive sea of people during rush hour. With Zone focusing and good light/flash, it's just about the perfect set-up for me. 35mm for just about everything else.
NYC, now there is a bucket-list place to go and shoot!! I still take a 35mm with me as a backup lens, and sometimes I will use it in really low light as it’s faster than my 28. I think 28/35 is the best two lens combination.
@@WalkLikeAlice what's on that list, Jeff? I've lived 40 yrs in manhattan, over 4 now in brooklyn. there are still interesting places i do not dare to walk into as an "outsider" w/ a camera. I'll take a bus tour to spot things out when it gets a little warmer. I always shoot alone. had been robbed in a better part of east village (see my linhof comment)
I used to carry a minolta auto flash w/ thyrister circuit & a leica m w/ no hotshoe. 40 or 28 mm w/o a frame but found make-do good enough even for slide use. or else a xd11 w/ 24->35 zoom. all hours in lower manhattan (below 14th st in the 80's/ early 90's) whenever on the streets. my first 35mm before slr's &m's was a 3-zone focus rangefinder camera no one ever heard of. The lens was small & great, prob. a 35 f2.8 ; don't remember. but did not keep for long as i was clumsy at attaching 135 film to a little hoke. it was a little mamiya ! miss it!
I use Summicron 35mm. Have 2 (one is an older 8 element). Despite having multiple other Leica lenses of various focal length I have used the 35mm almost exclusively for all subjects.
This is great! I have a number of lenses that I use but mostly use the 35mm. There are days that I want to "challenge" myself with other focal lengths. My most interesting challenge was the 20mm. I never had a 28mm but just picked one up with my new Nikon. Can't wait to get out and try it. Glad I found your channel. Subscribed! :)
This is brilliant. The best advice I've heard on the subject, with unique insights. Extremely helpful perspectives. Thank you! I have primarily photographed landscapes and wildlife using high quality zooms, however, you have impressed me with the value of a fixed focal length approach toward artistic development.
Mostly I use my 23mmf2 and 50mmf2 on my Fujifilm camera for street stuff. But I have to admit that I also enjoy just bringing my 50-140 lens (70-200mm equiv). for street photography. especially since I really like to take street pictures of cats and dogs. this is in my opinion a really good option for that. in my opinion there isn't a best lens for this or that. I enjoy both of my 3 lenses it just depends in what mood I am and what I want to shoot. I took on all those 3 equal amount of favorite shots for so far. I even shot like really cool cat pictures in Istanbul with my 23mmf2... maybe even the best ones I took were with this lens lol and this lens is considered soft at f2 and people hated about that lens for its shitty close up capabilities, but that's not what the lens is made for. but anyways just use your own vision and create something beautiful with the tool you have in your hand :) and enjoy the proces.
I also love the 23mmf2 or 50mmf2 on my XPro3. I know a lot of street photographers prefer 28mm-50mm (FF ) but since the pandemic I'm digging that 75mm FF equivalent I get from the 50mmf2. You can get some great shots with it without getting right up in peoples' faces.
Here are the lenses I liked to use for street photography: 35mm f/1.4 Zeiss Distagon ZM on Leica M6 and M10 (21/35/90mm kit) 35mm f/1.4 Nikkor on Nikon SLR (35/85/180mm kit) 23mm f/2 Fujinon on Fuji X mirrorless (16/23/56mm kit) 20mm f/1.7 Panasonic on Olympus micro 4/3 (14/20/45mm kit) 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor on Nikon SLR (24/50/105mm kit)
Great video as usual Jeff. I've been shooting with a Ricoh GR3 for the last year (28mm) and I'd tried the 21mm converter lens briefly but discounted it as it's heavy and unbalances the camera. I get very close to people (zone focus at 1 or 1.5m) and despite shooting over 10,000 images I'm still having the issue of being too close to get the image fully in frame more often than I'd like. I tend to shoot at shoulder height (I'm short, shorter than you). The issue of focal length just hadn't occurred to me, I'd assumed it was my own sloppy technique, I think I need to look at that 21mm adapter again...
Both you and Sara are superb photographers, a rare trait among TH-cam photographers. I shoot exclusively with 20/21mm lenses for my SLR/Rangefinder cameras. They have been my primary lenses since the late 70s.
@@WalkLikeAlice My primary camera is a 6x17 Linhof with a 90mm F5.6 Super Angulon. Same view, different aspect ratio. My first exposure to photography was viewing Kubrick's 2001:A Space Odyssey. I think that was a big influence. Cheers and keep up the superlative work.👍🌟🌟🌟🌟
@@linjicakonikon7666 A friend (trained in industrial design by Italian prof.) was influenced by Antonioni's Blow Up (circa 68?,Kubrick's too?) feat. Van Redgrave et.al. I too to a certain extent. My 1st moment (13yr)was seeing a (humbly mine) b&w 127-film Brownie print 're-producing' a memorable scene from 'GunFight at the OK Corral'. Accidental? The 28 was the shortest used over 14/15 yrs since 9th grade (Brit.Form 3). Then 24-35 , 24-50 af; w/the most recent 17-28 f/2.8 af I found myself mostly (>80% ?) at the 24-28 end. (a 25-50, only 2 weeks old, on a new body was robbed in front of a church in the crazy 80's/ early 90's.) I had the use of a borrowed 6x12 Mamiya rangefinder (but w/NO rangefinder focus, basically just a body w/ shutter to fit a lens) with a 47mm Schneider for a # days in 97. Good to have a used-camera dealer for a friend who also had a physics bkgd from an elite college. Used 120 chrome, don't remember using a meter (as I was overseas; may be I used af slr to meter) . Estimation + dof scale ( may be also w/ my usual hyperfocal less 1/2 actual stop to play safe; easier these days w/electronic shutters for fractional intervals) worked beautifully handheld. I also shot verticals, they were amazing. Imagine w/ 6x17 Linhof ; but not for me, hardly ever used a tripod after grade school.The other busy life over the the years did not allow it. Best wishes to your Linhof work.
It's 28mm for me. I may crop a little. Having a lens with zone focus distances is essential. It's a pity so many manufacturers have left this off their glass.
Thank you for that, and a couple of other videos of yours that i watched (Lkd&Subd). I have a sort of question.... I live deep rural and shoot forest and coast - what some people call landscape - and i also shoot the internals of industrial production facilities like steel mills and gold mines etc. But i travel (for work) and i find myself in urban jungles - 'street'. The received wisdom for 'street' seems to be primes, and i understand some of why, and i always have primes to hand, but in dynamic environments i feel inclined toward zooms. There's this orthodoxy in 'street' (it seems), going back a long way, that privileges primes over zooms. I can understand it in part from the film era - primes were very much the dominant (normal) type and the quality was generally much better than zooms - but the normal for digital is zooms and the quality is much closer than it was. Enough from me - anyone any thoughts?
I would agree with you that street photographers tend to be prime lens shooters. Smaller cameras are preferred by many and these often come with a prime lens attached (Leica Q series, Ricoh GR series, Fuji X100 series etc) or they don't have any decent small zoom options. Leica M users don't have any choice but to use primes. Having said this, both Steve McCurry and Martin Parr use zooms. William Klein used a zoom for much of his later street photography. So it doesn't follow that you have to use primes to shoot street, but it seems to be more common to do so. Within the practice of street photography, we both found it easier to work with one focal length rather than a zoom because of the way we work, but that's just us. I would say to anyone reading this that the most important thing is to find what works for you and use that. We are all different and see the world in different ways.
This is a topic that I'm interested in, I have a 23mm lens on my camera all of the time but take 16mm with me which I almost never use, still it helps with my confidence level just to know I can get wider if I choose to. Someday I will leave at home.
Kind of an anachronism here but I use a CL digital and use 3 focal lengths a 21mm Zeiss zm, Voigtlander 40mm and 75mm vm. So disappointed that Leica discontinued the CL digital I really like the aps-c size sensor, it's a really great M alternative if you like an EVF. And if you don't mind auto focus (whi h I'm not a fan of, hence the M lenses) it's got probably the best apsc lens selection out there. Sad, but maybe Leica will bring out something in this slot to replace it. Any way nice channel, like the your work, can't wait to see more!
Solid, sound advice that I will certainly take on board. I’m nearing the end of the video and surprised you haven’t yet mentioned the Fuji X100V, which everyone is raving on about, so much that they are almost unattainable. Apologies if you do finally mention it after 9.14m.
Hi Patrick, thanks for watching and your comments. Regarding the Fuji camera, I’ve never owned or used a Fuji digital, so it wouldn’t be something I could comment on with any authority 🙂
I'm far from expert when it comes to street / documentary work but I do enjoy its challenges. If I could only choose one lens to use with my Fuji X-Pro 1 and X-Pro2, it would be my 23mm f1.4 because I find it the most 'natural' lens with which to frame a shot. I have quite a few lenses for the Fuji XF system but I use many mostly for landscape. As I'm now in my 60s, I've started to use the 18-55mm f2.8-4.0 zoom more, as an 'insurance policy' due to its flexibility and to prevent the need to switch lenses and miss a shot. It also negates the need to zoom with my feet if my knees are playing up..! For unknown reasons, some Fuji users turn their nose up at this so-called 'kit lens'. Yes, the f2.8 16-55mm is a bit better if you're into pixel peeping but it's also bigger and heavier. I've always been delighted with results from it. I've recently acquired a LeicaQ2 and I'm starting to warm to 28mm. It has the benefit of a digital crop option to 35mm, 50mm and 75mm. The latter is a bit too low in resolution to be really useable but, at 35mm, it's very similar to the X-Pro2 sensor when using the 23mm f1.4.
"For unknown reasons, some Fuji users turn their nose up at this so-called 'kit lens'." Lens snobbery usually correlates with the inability to take photographs!!
@@WalkLikeAlice Couldn't agree more, Jeff. Spending any meaningful length of time zooming in to 100% or 200% to check 'sharpness' on what is intended to be a piece of photographic art and which will be viewed from a distance by people who couldn't care less about edge definition and critical sharpness seems like wasted time, to me.
Started taking pictures in my EOS rebel t5 when it came out in 2014. Never upgraded from a kit lens as I just adapted to it, now as of recently I think I’m noticing that wear and tear so I’m thinking about upgrading and am unsure what to really get, I’m not crazy on prime but it’s kinda growing on me (I do street/urbex photography )
If you are happy with a zoom, get another one with the same range. If you want a prime, then use the exif information in the image files to determine which length you use the most with the zoom and get a prime which closely matches that.
@@WalkLikeAlice been doing that last part a lot recently, I mainly shoot around 18-24mm but I’m not tryna spend a fortune😭 probably gonna have to. Thank you for the advice I appreciate it
I slightly prefer seeing people use the 50mm (which I use) above wider lenses. I think the 50mm slightly more encourages finding character, meaningful subjects etc. Whereas wide lenses slightly more lend themselves to habits around generically pretty wide shots or cliched 'person close up on the street'. I know the 35mm, for example, is very versatile. But my view is more around the weird way that even many amazing photographers seem to be churning out storyless, slightly wide pictures for clicks on social media. I think they might start telling more stories at 50mm. This comment probably sounds like I'm generalising a lot. I'm not. I know you can tell great stories with any lens. But I've observed these trends.
Without doubt this is the best advice given, and sharing examples of how a different focal lengths look, I'm new to this style of photography and struggled with various lens, so going to stick to one for the next 6 months (35mm) and see where tha takes me thanks for a great helpfull vlog.
Thank you!! I’m glad you found it useful. 🙏
Very helpful advise as I am at the point of deciding whether to get the Q3 28mm or the Q3 43 for street photo but some portrait capability and for street night photography. I presume the Q3 28 is a better choice even if the 48 is a better lens
I am in such a trouble deciding.
I love that 28mm keeps me humble. So much room to fill. I have to get close to subjects to bring interest. 50mm is too easy for me. The compression and angle of view makes it easier to compose an image but 28 pushes me and is more enjoyable.
Have you tried the 35mm yet? I also have 28mm.
Depending on what I'm out for when I'm on a street to take pictures, there are three preferred lenses for me (for full format cameras):
1. 28-30mm set on hyperfocal distance for candid shots
2. 70-90mm f1.8 or f2 Macro for street portraits and detail shots
3. 24mm shift lens for architecture
If there would be 24-70mm f2 shift lens, that would be the one best street photography lens for me.
This is genuinely helpful, thanks.
Some of the best lens advice I've ever heard, with a series of outstanding images to back up many of the points you have made. I'm not a street photographer, but 28mm is near enough my favourite focal length and so I've probably consumed almost every Leica Q2 video ever shared. It's extraordinary to me that people testing that particular camera, and in some cases having already bought it, seem unsure or lukewarm about 28mm and I can only conclude that they've got a lot more money than sense. But I dream on anyway and your artistry and common sense helps to fuel my photography journey. So thank you and your partner very much indeed.
You are very kind, Michael. I think 28 is a lens which needs to have some time spent with it. I was very surprised when Leica launched the Q series with a 28mm lens as standard. 35mm would have made more sense but would that have impacted on sales of the M series cameras and lenses?? I think so, and with the M's being more expensive and you need to buy a lens too, I can sort of understand why they went for 28mm. The Q is a safe Leica for TH-camrs, it looks cool, and it's basically a big point and shoot and it has the all important LCD screen which they can use to show how they are shooting in their POV videos!!
@@WalkLikeAlice ... I went with my Leica M11 into a busy Mumbai market to shoot. ( I am an Indian btw ), I just ambled into a shop of women's bags and the shopkeeper said, no cameras allowed, I said I am not shooting anything. " we dont allow TH-camrs into the shop " he said !... the pov video daemon! every knows when you are doing a Pov. And TH-camrs have subsumed the Photographer as the beast on the street !
@@neoaureus I’m not sure what this has to do with this video. But I agree with you that the trend for TH-camrs and POV has made people more aware of street photographers.
@@WalkLikeAlice …haha…I know but tangential. I took off from 28mm to … Q camera to … average street experience…and 28mm being the IPhone mm.
Excellent. Just the facts. No BS. Refreshing.
Thank you!!
Just starting on a street journey, I have a M43 Olympus and I am considering the 17 1.8. Enjoy your videos.
Thank you
I have always liked a 50mm. I use 35 more now for walking sidewalks where things are closer. My GRiiix has a 40 which is great. I also throw a tiny olympus 40-150(80-300 eq) in the bag for when I just want to sit on a bench in an open area and make some shots while relaxing. The 80mm eq on the zoom also works walking around for a change of pace and shooting window decorations and across intersections. Some street safari partners use a short 24-80 zoom all the time. In the street classes I teach I have students use either a 35 or 50 for all the class so they get a feel for it.
So many valid points made in this video. A lot of them I rarely see talked about in fact. Thank you, consider me subscribed sir 😌
Thank you. Glad you found it useful. 🙏
I always kept a 35-80 Tamron lens mounted to a Nikon FM when I did street photography on film.
So glad I found this channel! I used to love your comments and advice on the old (DWF) Digital Wedding Forum when I first became a wedding photographer 20+ years ago!
That’s a blast from the past!!
I’ve always liked the 35 and 50 on my apsc cameras, then I got a full frame with a 28mm and I absolutely love it. Great video, thanks for the topic!
Thank you for watching!!
35mm is classics and irs clesr why it's a typical number one choice. The photos are flat, however still not wide angled and distrited somehow. 50mm for someone is too close. 28mm is too wide, I've tried to make some photos ans simply was struggled what to photo because aimply wverybting was in the viewfinder, jt was too much too. I still think the best is juggling between 50 and 35
What a wonderful video! The subject is something I've been struggling with lately and after viewing this, I can't wait to stick with one focal length for a good amount of time and see how I develop. Also looking forward to watching many more of your videos.
Valuable advice, Jeff. I've come to use a 28 mm lens for most street photography. But I also enjoy hunting for shots which favor a 50 mm lens wide open at f 1.4. I often enjoy shallow depth of field. I've bought all my gear locally and my dealer will lend a lens or camera body for the weekend so I can see how comfortable I am with it.
Thank you
Just discovered your channel, great listening to you sharing your experience, thoughts and ideas re street photography. Well done !
Thank you so much. 🙏
I enjoyed your video, thanks for taking the time to speak on this and share examples. For me, I feel most comfortable with a 50mm. I find myself gravitating to it for the way it handles proportions. When I want to include more in the scene and get a more traditional street photo, I’ll use a 35mm. But I ultimately prefer the way the 50mm renders at the end of the day. All that being said, like you mentioned, it comes down to the photographer and how they see the world.
I grew up with a 50mm. I’ve had more 50 than any other lens and I agree, there is nothing better for rendering proportions. I still use mine a lot for landscapes of all things. I like the natural perspective.
wow...thanks a lot...this is / are very good advices! As you asked...i love 40mm most
Thank you
I think it's best to rent all the lenses. Some photo shops provide them for rent (for a certain time, for example, for a day or hours). It won’t brake your bank! I’ve tried fix lenses, wide angle like 10-20mm, but finally understood that I don’t go lower than 40mm but I will go for 100mm or even 200mm, so my choice was Nikkor 55-200mm.
Excellent advice. I just can’t quite nail which lens to go with but this has helped a lot with my thinking. Thanks.
Thanks. Glad you found it useful.
Without a doubt the best summary of how people should choose a lens (and why) I have come across. The too many lenses is a rabbit hole of wasted time - speaking from hard earned experience. I've settled on a 24 Elmar for my walk around lens.
Thank you, Peter. You are very kind. 24 I have never used on a Leica. I did use it a lot with a LUMIX camera I had a few years ago.
@@WalkLikeAlice I shot with the 21mm for a year and =found it a tad too wide too often great lens though so I shifted up to the 28 and shot for a couple of years - I can understand why Leica loves the 28mm - my preferred distance is 2-3meters so the 24 gives me more width but not as much as the 21. I guess the only thing you may have mentioned in your video is the focusing methods you both use to get your shots.....
@@petera1033 Hi Peter, we covered focusing in this video :)
th-cam.com/video/3vbculVI8Lg/w-d-xo.html
Great to hear your thoughts. Been shooting a 35mm lens for the last 18 months exclusively but considering moving to 28 this year for ease of zone focusing and more context in my shots
35 is a great lens.
Adapting to the 28mm focal length on my Leica Q was not easy after using interchangeables and mostly the 35mm on my cropped sensor Fuji X-T4!
But the Q and the fixed lens now feels so natural now. Also, the high image quality of the full frame Leica means that if I simply cannot physically move to the position to give me the ideal framing, I still have the option to crop and get a useable final image.
The physical tab for manual focusing on the Q is an important feature too. Using one lens also means I don’t have to remember which way the distance scale works so manual focusing can become quite intuitive.
I didn't know you had come over to the dark side, John ;)
@@WalkLikeAlice Yes. It's all your fault! I took the majority of my pics on it last year. Hugh Brownstone made me realise I'm not a landscape photographer so street it is for me and the Q so often delivers better pictures than I thought I'd captured which is a joy!
@@johnwaine56 don’t blame us!!!
Great food for thought. I have used a 35 for years capturing about 90% of my street images. COVID nearly stopped me from my hobby. Now to gain some inspiration and to get back at it, I am trying a 50mm until such time as when I feel comfortable getting in closer and wider to my scenes. I admit I carry too much gear out on the street. For now 35 and 50 lenses until I get well back into the groove of old. Also will try to blur more backgrounds to help focus on main subject.
I am liking the Tamron or Viltrox 20mm f/2.8 small compact lenses. Great inside and outside and Love the Wider Field of View on the Sony A7C. Cheers!
I’m not familiar with those lenses but the focal length is appealing
... sehr spannend. Hat mich weitergebracht. Thank You!
Hi Jeff. I've been shooting with the Leica M (film and digital) for the past 30 years and I'm still learning something new each day. Wise words indeed, from you on street shooting and I appreciate it very much. I've been following your channel for quite a while and love both of your pictures. Thanks and take care
Thank you so much. We’re glad you are enjoying the channel. 🙏
I use a Sigma 100mm-400mm lens for street photography. I don’t want to engage with people, and I don’t want to taint the scene with invading people’s space. I like the tight, no environment photograph-head and shoulders-is good enough for me and it’s my shooting style.
That's great!! Whatever works for you. That's the most important thing.
😂😂 I hope you’re trolling
First I thought this was a joke but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense for me and I'd live to test that out.
@@Schoolofshots1 Nope. I’m not-I’m serious. 🙂
@@Fenrizan get it a go-and enjoy!
Gosh, loved the images in this video
Thank you :)
Thank you for sharing the anecdote with Sebastian Salgado! He is one of my favorite artists.
He’s a lovely man too. Not at all affected by his fame.
Excellent advice. Ten years or so ago I decided to pursue street/documentary style and I had a 28-70 zoom. For the longest time, all my street photographs were turning out to be street portraits. It was terrible. I almost quit. Then I got a 50 and put an end to the madness. These days I still take multiple lenses with me, or a zoom on rare occasions, but I have trained my “mind’s eye” and I am disciplined about the focal length I deem appropriate for the environment I am in at that time. I choose it according to the mood/area/subject and don’t touch it until I move on to some other location, where activity/subjects/interest are different enough that it warrants a shorter or longer focal length. Do I miss shots because I have the wrong lens on? Oh yes, all the time. I learned to be ok with letting those go. And I can always come back tomorrow, using the different focal length, and that just adds to the fun and wonder of the streets.
I like your reply. Like you, I don’t think there is anything wrong with carrying more than one lens, provided of course you stick to just one for the purpose you set out to achieve! Maybe a 35mm for use on the street but if I’m in London and want to take photos in the Underground, I may opt for an 18mm (both on a crop sensor camera ).
I'm really enjoying this series where you're dispensing advice.
Thank you so much. We are glad you are enjoying the content.
Great video. Very educational.
RS. Canada
Thank you. Glad you liked it
Incidentially my focal length is also 28mm on full format if I feel comfortable with the envirionment and 35 mm if I prefer to keep a bit more of a distance to people. It may be also dictated by the environment. I stopped using wider lenses because the distortion makes them somewhat difficult to use even when you are not in hurry.
It’s the distortion that attracts me to the wider angles. It gives the image a different dimension which I really like.
@@WalkLikeAlice Kudos to you, because you obviously mastered this but I failed to make it work for me most of the time. Maybe I should give it another try.
When doing my urban outings with my Olympus Pen F I will quite often take two lenses but rarely change sticking with the one for the day. I have three that I which alternate between Olympus 12 and 17 mm which usually live with that camera in that bag I might switch out one and put my 25mm 1.4 lumix leica if I feel that just a bit more reach or distance from what I am photographing. I did try with my 56mm (112) if wanting to put in 35mm terms but was to long.
I used the LUMIX/Leica 12mm for a while. Those lenses are fantastic on m43.
@@WalkLikeAlice not had a chance to try the 12mm maybe one day! Also have shot with the 15mm but think the Olympus lenses work better if needing to manual focus
I have some photographer experience and do photo shoot direction but want to get into street photography. I found this exceptionally helpful and inspriing. Thank you, I have subscribed.
Thank you. Glad to have you along 🙏
My main street setup is a Leica M240 and CV 35/1.4 Nokton. I have tried my 28/2 Ultron II, but found it to wide for me. I did enjoy shooting street with a 90/2.8 Elmarit-M this past weekend.. Thanks for the chat...
I think the 28mm, although popular, is a really difficult lens to work with. It takes a lot of perseverance. I was surprised that Leica used a 28mm in the Q series.
Love this channel Jeff. What are you doing on Sunday? May I recommend the Liverpool ChinaTown new year celebrations? It’s a wonderful street event. I’ll be the one with the 50mm! K.O. 12 noon
Sarah is just looking at train times!!
Great video. I'm currently trying to decide between the 23mm F2 and 27mm F2.8 for Fuji APS-C. Although close in focal length it seems like quite a distinct choice!
Can’t help you there. I have no idea re Fuji lenses.
Thanks for the reply. I guess I meant more the different between 35mm and 40mm FF equiv for street @@WalkLikeAlice
I like 35 and 50mm focal length those fit good..I am new to it so 28mm is nice but gets use to... awesome work mate
Thank you!! Yes, the 28mm takes some time to get used to especially if you are coming from a longer lens.
Great thoughts and video. Since 1970 I primarily use primes from 28 - 90 mm. One camera - one lens.
Thanks for watching 🙏
I just bought the Fuji XT5 and the 23mm f2 lens. Switching from micro four thirds and looking forward to shooting with a prime lens again.
Heading out with it for the first time this weekend.
Have fun!!
I brought that lens along with my X-T1 on a trip to Europe many years ago. Great images that I still enjoy viewing today. You are going to love that combo!
Olympus Pen F with 8-18mm Olympus lens and also a Leica M8 with an 18mm Carl Zieiss, both cameras are black and I’ve blacked out the white lettering on both cameras, I have a silver Leica M9 but that shows up more and find it attracts a bit more attention, I use the Leica M9 for social occasions, usually fitted with a Leica 24mm lens.
The M9 silver does attract more attention. Sarah will agree there.
SUch a great video. It makes me realize that right now i see the world in 50mm terms and If I want to go to a 35mm or 28mm I will need to learn to see a bit differently. Also, so jealous you got to meet the great Salgado, that's a great anecdote about his pancake lens.
Thank you.
I really appreciate your generosity with your experience. Thank-you.
Thank you for watching 🙏
Great Channel, thank you for providing very useful information and insights.
My pleasure. I'm glad you find it useful
This, like all your videos I’ve seen so far, is so amazingly helpful and wonderful! It’s so positive and affirming. It’s just magnificent and I really appreciate them. Too many times I’d see videos and would just want to give up. With y’all, it’s just the opposite. I feel more enthusiastic to pull out the camera that has been sitting idle for far too long.
Thank you so much. Glad you find them useful 🙏🙏
I’ve always loved the 28mm. I’ve gravitated between that and the 35mm and have gotten interesting work with both, but I love the unique look a 28mm brings to street photography. Just discovered your channel, and have now subscribed. Love the reference to Salgado, a god of photography in my book
Thank you. Salgado is next level genius when it comes to photography.
i love you man, love how beautifully you explain your ideas.
🙏
Mostly i use the Voigtländer 21mm f3.5 Color-Skopar on my Sony APS/C. This combo is light weight and supplys good looking pics in bnw.
21mm works so well with any cropped sensor. It gives a really unique look.
Shooting street pix today is very much like doing press work in the 80's, before zooms...
I use 2 bodies with a wide (usually a 35mm) and a short tele (usually a 75mm) The trick to avoid the indecision is to look at each picture opportunity and decide on the fly which body I need to take it... Obviously changing lenses is not a possibility, but deciding between 2 bodies in less of a problem...
I'm always looking for pictures and anticipating where it will be.. during this process I can chose my lens and be ready if it breaks down as I hope...
This is how we worked in press photography before fast zooms took over...
Thumbs Up! Great video taking the snootiness out of picking expensive fast glass out of decision process. Also appreciated your comments about how to choose a focal length that works for each of us based on how we're editing and our comfort level is in approaching a situation.
Thank you so much for watching and commenting. 🙏
@@WalkLikeAlice How do feel about zoom lenses? Say something like a 28-70 f2.8? smaller fast zoom?
@@SilatShooter for me personally, a zoom was always a source of frustration. It caused me to stand in one place and use the lens to find a photo. It was also slow to use, heavy etc. But we’ve all seen what Steve McCurry does with one!!
hi Jeff, second time around seeing this video : still triggering interesting thoughts on my side... I am 6 foot 4 and I tend to shoot with the camera positionned under my chin (with a 21 or 28 mm), sometimes its more of a move : bringing the camera under my chin : clic , contiuning and bringing the finder to my eye and clic again, under 1 ou 2 seconds timeframe. Additionally, I find distance from subject dictate my lens choice and environnement dictate distance : in a fair or setting with crowds :1-5 feet (21mm), small town with less people = 10-15 feet (35mm or 50 mm), the 28mm is really an all-arounder and fits almost all scenarios. This is not mathematical as you know and like you said in the video : the personnality of the photographer plays a huge role. cheers to Sarah and you !
At 6’4 and with your camera to your chin - that would be like me holding it above my head!!!
I still love using my Lumix GX80.
My fave lens for street is the Leica Summilux 15mm 1.7
( 30mm equivalent.)
I've got used to it, and just love that lens.
Great video, very valuable advice, thanks.
Thanks for watching 🙏
Great advice. When I started I thought I was a 35mm guy because everyone said I should be. Then when processing I realized I was consistently cropping to 50mm range and it felt wasteful tossing away all that sensor space. Since then I shoot 90% with a 50 and much happier
That’s great. Everyone is different and people should find their own way.
Last week I went to see Tom Wood exhibition in Liverpool , his cameras are on display including the lenses. He used a Leica 50mm Summitar and the Russian lens Jupiter 8 50mm lens. His B&W street work was really impressive.
Thanks for the reply. I hadn’t come across Tom’s work before. Just spent a very pleasurable ten minutes looking at his site. It’s obvious he found his perfect focal length.
I shot with film M`s for 30 years (still do at times) using 40 or 50 .Today I often go out with my digital CL with either a 35 or just a 50 .I went a few years using a various Ricoh GRD`s and rapidly got used to the 28fl. Now I think conditions on the street have changed in the 30 years since I started. People are more socially aware of cameras and that seems to necessitate using longer fl`s than previously .... perhaps. It depends whether you talking "walk about street" or street events I guess . Nice content by the way .
I’ve heard this a few times from photographers. The idea that you need to be further away. Whatever you feel comfortable with is the correct choice. But I remember reading an article about Cartier-Bresson and his work in America. He said something on the lines of him having to forsake his 50mm for a 35mm because everything was so big and busy.
great advices in this video; for me, its 40mm if I have to choose one. Once in awhile, I will go full Saul Leiter with my 135mm, just to change and shake myself....
For me, McCullin is the master of long lens street photography. Leiter’s work is great but it’s from a certain time which is part of its charm.
just saw your video with Mr McCullin on converting to digital : fantastic video ! did he switch ?
@@denislaroche3957 For his small format stuff, I believe he did. There are a number of TV docs where he's using digital for when he would normally use 35mm. His landscapes he still shoots on medium/large format film.
I love the 50. it creates a great depth, helps isolate my subjects & doest not create distorted images.
Thank you for your insights and advice. I agree and really enjoyed this video. Cheers!
Thank you so much for watching!!
For me, when I purchased the Leica Apo 35 Summicron it was a religious revelation. Outrageous price but wonderful results.
Had the close focus Summilux version before and never liked it greatly. Found an Apo sat on a dealer shelf and a deal was done.
Don’t miss the f1.4 at all on an M11-P and it produces amazing quality.
Amazing lens
Truly. I really cannot put into words just why either. I’ve been a photographer for over 40 years and yet I cannot possibly explain the abilities of that lens. It’s magic. That’s the only possibility!
For street, I use a 28mm lens on both my film camera (Bessa R4M) and digital Leica Q2 Mono. No choice on the Q2M. 😊 love 28mm
Just picked a new hobby and as a beginner on budget...great advice on lens and cameras. Hoping to use Nikon 1 J5 10-30mm and stay on course to be good as using it. Cheers
Have fun with it!!
I’ve used either 50mm or 28mm macro for extended periods and find them both quite versatile within the constraints that they give me.
Nice and useful video.. I have a 24-70 lens
I have a 50 lens and a Nikon 28-300 lens. I use the 50 for street photography and it is comfortable because it works with an aperture of 1.8. The 28-300 lens is comfortable with controlling the zoom, but it needs light, so it is not good for street photography at night.
👍
I used to use a 28mm then moved to a 24mm my friend used a 21mm, and I now use a 16mm to 35 mm Zoom. I also used a pair of Olympus 35 RC cameras sometimes which are a rangefinder with a 42mm lens.
Hi. Originally I played with the idea to try a Tamron 35-150. But this lens is huge and heavy and expensiv. So i got the idea to take my Sony 24-105G and mounted it instead on my A7RIII ,on my Sony 6700 (APSC). So the focal length is 36-160 and the combi is still transportable, good to handle and I have nearly all relevant focal length at least for street f. in one objectiv. Even the trees on the top of the opposite mountain in 1Kilometer distance are still sharp. I am happy with "my" solution.
👍
I'm very introvert, not that much shy, had an powershot câmera and love the focal length, almost 200mm, few years went by and i love wide angles, rn i have an cheap 25mm lens on a apsc body, 38mm ish on ff, love the range, looking into an 18mm to try out that 28mm wide angle
5ft 8 ? You wish… maybe in Sarah’s heels…great video 100% agree shoot what works for you
I’m still taller than you 🤪
In late 2020, after a trip to Italy shooting around the towns and villages with a 50mm attached to a D850 (normally used for landscapes), I caught the “street” bug, was subsequently afflicted with “Leica lust”, sold a kidney, and supplemented my Nikon DSLR kit with an M10R plus a 35mm summicron. I’ve since added a slightly bigger camera bag, a 75mm f1.5 Voigtlander and a 50mm summilux both of which as it turns out, rarely leave the bag in favour of the 35mm which seems to have become superglued to the camera. Now, thanks in part to your channel, I find myself seeking confirmation bias that I should add the 28mm Elmar to my collection. Don’t feel bad, yours is a great channel. Blame Sarah, I’m sure she won’t mind. Anyway, thanks for the channel. Your editing/advisory videos are useful and interesting and, in this latest case, has left me wanting to go through my photos to analyse how much butchery I perform with the crop tool, and whether I’m adjusting my shots to fit a lens (a 28mm of course) that I don’t have. Perhaps when the weather warms up, you and Sarah might share a few more walk-about videos where you somehow make British seaside towns look like places I’d like to visit. They (your videos I mean) are a breath of fresh air. Thanks again.
Thank you, Mark. You are very kind. I think the Leica M just feels right with a 35mm, you can see the framelines properly and the viewfinder magnification suits the focal length. The 28 will need a supplementary viewfinder to work well and with the M10R, zone focusing will be harder to get right as the resolution is so high. I would stick with the 35mm. There isn't a huge difference between 35 and 28 and you already have a great lens.
@@WalkLikeAlice Many thanks for the reply. I couldn’t help checking in the user guide what you said about the 28mm frame lines with the M10R. It says…“The relevant bright-line frame will light up in the combinations 35 mm + 135 mm, 50 mm + 75 mm or 28 mm + 90 mm when lenses with a focal length of 28 (Elmarit as of serial number 2 411 001), 35, 50, 75, 90 and 135 mm are used.” As I said… confirmation bias wherever I can find it, but I’ll endeavour to heed your, what I know to be sound advice and spend my money going to places using my Leica rather than feeding my kit fixation.. What can I say…“My name is Mark, and I own a Leica” Have a good weekend. Cheers.
@@marksabin6336 In fairness to Leica, the 28 framelines will show up in the viewfinder, but whether you can see them clearly or not is another matter. The viewfinder mag on the M10 is 0.73 I believe. Unless you push your eye really hard into the viewfinder, you struggle to see them. If you wear glasses, you've no chance!! You can always check by moving the lever next to the lens mount, that will pop each set of framelines into the window for you.
Fantastic channel Jeff. Thank you. I’m trying to improve my street photography. It’s between an autofocus 35m 1.4 and manual CV 40mm Nokton for me. I need to work at estimating focus distance as focusing through the view finder slows me down. Do you think it’s worth the effort? As a leica shooter I imagine you do? A possible future video on manual focus tips?! I don’t miss a shot on the autofocus lens but the CV is smaller and somehow more fun.
Thank you. Manual lenses with a decent DOF scale, for me, is always better than an AF lens when it comes to street.
@@WalkLikeAlice Thank you for the reply Jeff. I’ll stick at it!!
I use a Nikon full frame. I bought a 40mm a year and a half ago. I think it's a good compromise between the 35mm and 50mm. I love that lens. I bought a 28mm at Christmas. It may not be the sharpest lens but I really like the focal length. I can get closer to people and still have enough of the scene in the frame to put in context where they are. 40mm is better for things across the street from you or further down the street from you. I recently bought an old Canon AE-1. It came with a 50mm lens. I found a 28mm that was like new on fb market for $50. That included shipping. I grew up with point and shoot film cameras but never an SLR. I always wanted one. I picked up the camera for $85. So I only have a little over $100 in it. I've spent that much on film and processing of not more. I think I've shot 7 rolls through it since April. I still prefer my mirrorless cameras but I think shooting film with an all manual camera makes you slow down and think about the shot because you don't want to waste a bad shot since there's only 36 to a roll. I think shooting film will help my street photography with a digital camera.
Very well put together information. Thank you for getting straight to the point(s), no infuriating waffle. Very informative and thought provoking video. Thank you 🙂✌️
Thanks for watching!! And, yes, our channel is a waffle-free zone 😂
Most of the time I shoot with a 35mm lens but also carry a 50mm both small compact lenses and a small camera body with a couple of batteries the second lens in a pocket just subbed the channel thanks.......
Thank you. Much appreciated 🙏
Excellent thoughts here.
Usually 2 bodies, 2 lenses - 28 & 40 (or lately, a 60). This most likely influenced by years of using 2 Minolta CLE for travel.
Single body 35 (or 40).
Best
Thank you!! I've often thought about using two bodies, but I always think it draws attention to me. I'm not sure if it actually does, but it's that little bit of doubt which stops me going down that route.
@@WalkLikeAlice Carrying 2 bodies ‘can’ be discreet. Typically for me it’s a 75/25 ratio. Having a main body (75) at the ready with a 2nd body (25) in a small bag, clipped (not zipped) for easy access. A point & shoot works as a second body as well; small & non-threatening. A Minilux (40mm) and a CLE/28mm is a brilliantly discrete combo.
Enjoy your (& Sarah’s) work.
Cheers from the Pacific NW, USA.
Fantastic video as always. I find myself juggling between the 35mm and 28mm. I shoot Street mostly in NYC so its always the 28mm as I dive into the massive sea of people during rush hour. With Zone focusing and good light/flash, it's just about the perfect set-up for me. 35mm for just about everything else.
NYC, now there is a bucket-list place to go and shoot!! I still take a 35mm with me as a backup lens, and sometimes I will use it in really low light as it’s faster than my 28. I think 28/35 is the best two lens combination.
@@WalkLikeAlice what's on that list, Jeff?
I've lived 40 yrs in manhattan, over 4 now in brooklyn.
there are still interesting places i do not dare to walk into as an "outsider" w/ a camera. I'll take a bus tour to spot things out when it gets a little warmer. I always shoot alone. had been robbed in a better part of east village (see my linhof comment)
I used to carry a minolta auto flash w/ thyrister circuit & a leica m w/ no hotshoe.
40 or 28 mm w/o a frame but found make-do good enough even for slide use.
or else a xd11 w/ 24->35 zoom. all hours in lower manhattan (below 14th st
in the 80's/ early 90's) whenever on the streets.
my first 35mm before slr's &m's was a 3-zone focus rangefinder camera no one
ever heard of. The lens was small & great, prob. a 35 f2.8 ; don't remember.
but did not keep for long as i was clumsy at attaching 135 film to a little hoke.
it was a little mamiya ! miss it!
I use Summicron 35mm. Have 2 (one is an older 8 element). Despite having multiple other Leica lenses of various focal length I have used the 35mm almost exclusively for all subjects.
35 is a great focal length for the Leica.
A really nice breakdown. Subscribed
Thank you so much. Really appreciated!!
This is great! I have a number of lenses that I use but mostly use the 35mm. There are days that I want to "challenge" myself with other focal lengths. My most interesting challenge was the 20mm. I never had a 28mm but just picked one up with my new Nikon. Can't wait to get out and try it. Glad I found your channel. Subscribed! :)
Thanks, Lou. Much appreciated 🙏
This is brilliant. The best advice I've heard on the subject, with unique insights. Extremely helpful perspectives. Thank you! I have primarily photographed landscapes and wildlife using high quality zooms, however, you have impressed me with the value of a fixed focal length approach toward artistic development.
Thank you. Glad you found it useful 🙏
Mostly I use my 23mmf2 and 50mmf2 on my Fujifilm camera for street stuff. But I have to admit that I also enjoy just bringing my 50-140 lens (70-200mm equiv). for street photography. especially since I really like to take street pictures of cats and dogs. this is in my opinion a really good option for that. in my opinion there isn't a best lens for this or that. I enjoy both of my 3 lenses it just depends in what mood I am and what I want to shoot. I took on all those 3 equal amount of favorite shots for so far. I even shot like really cool cat pictures in Istanbul with my 23mmf2... maybe even the best ones I took were with this lens lol and this lens is considered soft at f2 and people hated about that lens for its shitty close up capabilities, but that's not what the lens is made for. but anyways just use your own vision and create something beautiful with the tool you have in your hand :) and enjoy the proces.
I also love the 23mmf2 or 50mmf2 on my XPro3. I know a lot of street photographers prefer 28mm-50mm (FF ) but since the pandemic I'm digging that 75mm FF equivalent I get from the 50mmf2. You can get some great shots with it without getting right up in peoples' faces.
Here are the lenses I liked to use for street photography:
35mm f/1.4 Zeiss Distagon ZM on Leica M6 and M10 (21/35/90mm kit)
35mm f/1.4 Nikkor on Nikon SLR (35/85/180mm kit)
23mm f/2 Fujinon on Fuji X mirrorless (16/23/56mm kit)
20mm f/1.7 Panasonic on Olympus micro 4/3 (14/20/45mm kit)
50mm f/1.4 Nikkor on Nikon SLR (24/50/105mm kit)
Thx u . Im having that dilemma and i think ima go w the 28mm rf 2.8 pancake with my cannon r8
I think the question should be which guitar is best for you? Telecaster last week, Strat this week 😉
Haha. That’s still a work in progress. I’ve got too many guitars. As for pedals, I’m not even going there 🙈😂
@@WalkLikeAlice like cameras, they’re an addiction 🙈
Great video as usual Jeff. I've been shooting with a Ricoh GR3 for the last year (28mm) and I'd tried the 21mm converter lens briefly but discounted it as it's heavy and unbalances the camera. I get very close to people (zone focus at 1 or 1.5m) and despite shooting over 10,000 images I'm still having the issue of being too close to get the image fully in frame more often than I'd like. I tend to shoot at shoulder height (I'm short, shorter than you). The issue of focal length just hadn't occurred to me, I'd assumed it was my own sloppy technique, I think I need to look at that 21mm adapter again...
Thanks Craig.
Both you and Sara are superb photographers, a rare trait among TH-cam photographers. I shoot exclusively with 20/21mm lenses for my SLR/Rangefinder cameras. They have been my primary lenses since the late 70s.
Thank you. Much respect to you for using those lenses as primaries. It takes some skill.
@@WalkLikeAlice My primary camera is a 6x17 Linhof with a 90mm F5.6 Super Angulon. Same view, different aspect ratio. My first exposure to photography was viewing Kubrick's 2001:A Space Odyssey. I think that was a big influence. Cheers and keep up the superlative work.👍🌟🌟🌟🌟
@@linjicakonikon7666 A friend (trained in industrial design by Italian prof.)
was influenced by Antonioni's Blow Up (circa 68?,Kubrick's too?) feat. Van
Redgrave et.al. I too to a certain extent. My 1st moment (13yr)was seeing a (humbly mine) b&w 127-film Brownie print 're-producing' a memorable scene from 'GunFight at the OK Corral'. Accidental?
The 28 was the shortest used over 14/15 yrs since 9th grade (Brit.Form 3).
Then 24-35 , 24-50 af; w/the most recent 17-28 f/2.8 af I found myself
mostly (>80% ?) at the 24-28 end. (a 25-50, only 2 weeks old, on a new body was robbed in front of a church in the crazy 80's/ early 90's.)
I had the use of a borrowed 6x12 Mamiya rangefinder (but w/NO rangefinder focus, basically just a body w/ shutter to fit a lens) with a 47mm Schneider for a # days in 97. Good to have a used-camera dealer for a friend who also had a physics bkgd from an elite college.
Used 120 chrome, don't remember using a meter (as I was overseas; may be I used af slr to meter) . Estimation + dof scale ( may be also w/ my
usual hyperfocal less 1/2 actual stop to play safe; easier these days w/electronic shutters for fractional intervals) worked beautifully handheld.
I also shot verticals, they were amazing.
Imagine w/ 6x17 Linhof ; but not for me, hardly ever used a tripod after grade school.The other busy life over the the years did not allow it.
Best wishes to your Linhof work.
I have a 28 on my Q2M, 35mm Summilux , 50 mm Summicron, and 90mm macro(collapsable)
It's 28mm for me. I may crop a little. Having a lens with zone focus distances is essential. It's a pity so many manufacturers have left this off their glass.
Or they have a scale which doesn’t work at f8!!
@@WalkLikeAlice - good point, well made 👍
Thank you for that, and a couple of other videos of yours that i watched (Lkd&Subd). I have a sort of question.... I live deep rural and shoot forest and coast - what some people call landscape - and i also shoot the internals of industrial production facilities like steel mills and gold mines etc. But i travel (for work) and i find myself in urban jungles - 'street'. The received wisdom for 'street' seems to be primes, and i understand some of why, and i always have primes to hand, but in dynamic environments i feel inclined toward zooms. There's this orthodoxy in 'street' (it seems), going back a long way, that privileges primes over zooms. I can understand it in part from the film era - primes were very much the dominant (normal) type and the quality was generally much better than zooms - but the normal for digital is zooms and the quality is much closer than it was. Enough from me - anyone any thoughts?
I would agree with you that street photographers tend to be prime lens shooters. Smaller cameras are preferred by many and these often come with a prime lens attached (Leica Q series, Ricoh GR series, Fuji X100 series etc) or they don't have any decent small zoom options. Leica M users don't have any choice but to use primes. Having said this, both Steve McCurry and Martin Parr use zooms. William Klein used a zoom for much of his later street photography. So it doesn't follow that you have to use primes to shoot street, but it seems to be more common to do so. Within the practice of street photography, we both found it easier to work with one focal length rather than a zoom because of the way we work, but that's just us. I would say to anyone reading this that the most important thing is to find what works for you and use that. We are all different and see the world in different ways.
This is a topic that I'm interested in, I have a 23mm lens on my camera all of the time but take 16mm with me which I almost never use, still it helps with my confidence level just to know I can get wider if I choose to. Someday I will leave at home.
I totally get that. There's always something in our brains that thinks "what if" but most of the time that situation never arises!!
Kind of an anachronism here but I use a CL digital and use 3 focal lengths a 21mm Zeiss zm, Voigtlander 40mm and 75mm vm. So disappointed that Leica discontinued the CL digital I really like the aps-c size sensor, it's a really great M alternative if you like an EVF. And if you don't mind auto focus (whi h I'm not a fan of, hence the M lenses) it's got probably the best apsc lens selection out there. Sad, but maybe Leica will bring out something in this slot to replace it. Any way nice channel, like the your work, can't wait to see more!
Thank you, Keith. I’ve never used the CL but I was tempted a few years back!!
23mm on a cropped fuji. i love it 😊
Great video, thank you!
🙏🙏
nice description. I liked it. thanks,
Thanks for watching 🙏
Solid, sound advice that I will certainly take on board. I’m nearing the end of the video and surprised you haven’t yet mentioned the Fuji X100V, which everyone is raving on about, so much that they are almost unattainable. Apologies if you do finally mention it after 9.14m.
Hi Patrick, thanks for watching and your comments. Regarding the Fuji camera, I’ve never owned or used a Fuji digital, so it wouldn’t be something I could comment on with any authority 🙂
again, it is inspiring. Thank you.
I'm far from expert when it comes to street / documentary work but I do enjoy its challenges. If I could only choose one lens to use with my Fuji X-Pro 1 and X-Pro2, it would be my 23mm f1.4 because I find it the most 'natural' lens with which to frame a shot. I have quite a few lenses for the Fuji XF system but I use many mostly for landscape. As I'm now in my 60s, I've started to use the 18-55mm f2.8-4.0 zoom more, as an 'insurance policy' due to its flexibility and to prevent the need to switch lenses and miss a shot. It also negates the need to zoom with my feet if my knees are playing up..! For unknown reasons, some Fuji users turn their nose up at this so-called 'kit lens'. Yes, the f2.8 16-55mm is a bit better if you're into pixel peeping but it's also bigger and heavier. I've always been delighted with results from it. I've recently acquired a LeicaQ2 and I'm starting to warm to 28mm. It has the benefit of a digital crop option to 35mm, 50mm and 75mm. The latter is a bit too low in resolution to be really useable but, at 35mm, it's very similar to the X-Pro2 sensor when using the 23mm f1.4.
"For unknown reasons, some Fuji users turn their nose up at this so-called 'kit lens'." Lens snobbery usually correlates with the inability to take photographs!!
@@WalkLikeAlice Couldn't agree more, Jeff. Spending any meaningful length of time zooming in to 100% or 200% to check 'sharpness' on what is intended to be a piece of photographic art and which will be viewed from a distance by people who couldn't care less about edge definition and critical sharpness seems like wasted time, to me.
Started taking pictures in my EOS rebel t5 when it came out in 2014. Never upgraded from a kit lens as I just adapted to it, now as of recently I think I’m noticing that wear and tear so I’m thinking about upgrading and am unsure what to really get, I’m not crazy on prime but it’s kinda growing on me (I do street/urbex photography )
If you are happy with a zoom, get another one with the same range. If you want a prime, then use the exif information in the image files to determine which length you use the most with the zoom and get a prime which closely matches that.
@@WalkLikeAlice been doing that last part a lot recently, I mainly shoot around 18-24mm but I’m not tryna spend a fortune😭 probably gonna have to. Thank you for the advice I appreciate it
I slightly prefer seeing people use the 50mm (which I use) above wider lenses. I think the 50mm slightly more encourages finding character, meaningful subjects etc. Whereas wide lenses slightly more lend themselves to habits around generically pretty wide shots or cliched 'person close up on the street'.
I know the 35mm, for example, is very versatile. But my view is more around the weird way that even many amazing photographers seem to be churning out storyless, slightly wide pictures for clicks on social media. I think they might start telling more stories at 50mm.
This comment probably sounds like I'm generalising a lot. I'm not. I know you can tell great stories with any lens. But I've observed these trends.