Pimax CRYSTAL LIGHT vs QUEST 3 - Which is BEST for PCVR? A Flight Sim Perspective | MSFS & DCS World

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video is a no nonsense, in depth comparison of the Quest 3 vs the new Pimax Crystal Light. Which one makes the most sense for you? Is Eye tracking really that important? Let's discuss!
    If this video has been useful and you are thinking of ordering a Pimax Crystal Light, please feel free to use the following link (which is Affiliated) HERE: pimax.com/page...
    Don't buy this headset: • DPVR E4 | The BEST Bud...
    Your support is greatly appreciated and helps keep the channel running.
    Help Support the channel with a one off donation here: paypal.me/VRFL...
    DISCORD: / discord
    STORMFORCE HIGH END PC DEALS: tidd.ly/3qBFn15
    USE DISCOUT CODE: SF5VRFSGUY
    Please note some of these links are affiliated which helps support the channel
    Thanks for watching!
    VRFSG
    #microsoftflightsimulator #vr #simulator

ความคิดเห็น • 290

  • @VRFlightSimGuy
    @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    NEWS! Things are changing fast lol. Local dimming version now $799😮😮 Are you tempted by the Pimax Light? If this video has been useful and you are thinking of ordering a Pimax Crystal Light, please feel free to use the following link (which is Affiliated) HERE: pimax.com/pages/crystal-light?ref=r2cQAf - It really helps support the channel. Have a great weekend!

    • @SweViver
      @SweViver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not even I was aware of the change today lol

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SweViver 🤣👌

    • @toututu2993
      @toututu2993 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If only none local dimming also have a $200 price cut to $500. That is a huge win deal

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@toututu2993Not every VR manufacturer has money to burn by subsidising their headsets. Let's be realistic now. This is already a fantastic deal.

    • @MrAnthonyfrench
      @MrAnthonyfrench 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      just made my order through the link, Cheers.
      Do you think ill be on first batch, made order about 8:30pm
      LoL , SweViver didn't know about the price reduction.
      I ordered the local dimming version with Lighthouse faceplate so hopefully i will still get that reduction.
      I'm really looking forward to this, I'm still on the G2 after trying the Quest 3. got my 4090 and 14900KS recently so Things are going to be sweet, some saving up has been going on i can tell you that.
      Thanks again Steve, good information, on point as usual, keeps me in the loop and poor as usual lol

  • @terjehelle
    @terjehelle 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Not upset.
    I’m happy for PC VR, and really happy to get another “real” PC VR headset that’s not in the 1500 bracket.

  • @TheHexperience
    @TheHexperience 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did you get a pimax light for review or are you going by the specs?

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Pimax Light is going to be exactly the same as the standard Crystal where it counts, and since I have over a years worth of experience with the headset, I am well informed. I'm also getting concerned for those who really want one, that pre orders are getting full already!

  • @exodous02
    @exodous02 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not going to spend more than what the quest 3 is before the Deckard comes out, lol. I'd pay Apple money for it if it meets the specs of the AVP. Until then I'm happy with the Quest 3.

  • @Vr-pits-simulation
    @Vr-pits-simulation 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe I should start doing videos… I have a crystal and tried it out for a short time. The Quest 3 is so much more comfortable with the bobo strap, no comparison. Quest 3 lenses are much better and no eye strain. I see artifacts in both headsets… almost the same in Dcs.

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm referring to the Crystal Light, which will be A LOT more comfortable than the standard Crystal you have. Light by name, light by nature. Also.. Yes, please do make some videos. I'd love to see them. We need more flight sim VR TH-camrs.

  • @GetOffMyyLawn
    @GetOffMyyLawn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Quest 3 user here... totally agree that the biggest shortcoming is the lack of direct video over the link cable. My first headset had a bright stuck pixel and bad mura... the replacement seems better, so there might be a panel lottery. That being said, I am super happy using it with MSFS and the ability to use it as a standalone device for native games, netflix etc is more than just an added bonus. Plus, you can pick it up at a local store, and return it if you have a problem.

  • @hangon1418
    @hangon1418 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If only it was not strapping a breadbox on your face :(

  • @southengland-thesunshineco5999
    @southengland-thesunshineco5999 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    And Remember kids, get out of your headsets sometimes to get outdoors & enjoy all of the many clear blue skies days & months of England, any time of the year.

  • @PaddyPatrone
    @PaddyPatrone 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why the heck doesn`t the pimax headset have pancacke lenses? At this pricepoint you would think this should be the way to go...

    • @thatstokedgamer
      @thatstokedgamer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Pancake lenses are expensive and new. Pimax doesn't have infinite money like Meta.

    • @elmalloc
      @elmalloc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatstokedgamer quest 3 it is I guess then.

    • @PaddyPatrone
      @PaddyPatrone 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatstokedgamer Are pancacke lenses that much more expensive to make?

  • @alexsp7086
    @alexsp7086 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    uff sorry the pimax is the worst for comfort, and tracking for the controllers is worse than the G2.
    For the price i think Pimax took people for a ride.
    I got the crystal and realised they hid everything behind just visuals.
    For 1600 Euro they should have included the DMAX earphones and the light house. For 1600 the crystal (not light ) is not worth the price.

  • @seraphimelegy6747
    @seraphimelegy6747 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I remember dropping my $2000 Varjo Aero twice when i first got it. O hated myself so much, but loved that their build quality is so high. Had me sweating though

  • @OverkillSimulations
    @OverkillSimulations 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great job speaking to the cost of features. I'm seeing the same comments. People wanting all of the features without the cost. I agree with you completely

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks mate much appreciated ☺️

    • @Virtusim
      @Virtusim 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Agreewith you, Mike. I think for MSFS only, the headset with local dimming without controllers is a great option. This wilkl be my next headset.

    • @zeevkatz6
      @zeevkatz6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Virtusimaren’t the controllers required? Is it possible to manage without them?

  • @PaulinP-wx5dz
    @PaulinP-wx5dz หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Of course, then again the skies are always clear in S. England for 10 months of the year though!

  • @technikchegger7228
    @technikchegger7228 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Clear for me light or normal crystal. I can use the Quest 3 but when I see the visuals of the Crystal or even Aero in comparison there is no going back.Aspherical lenses are simply a quality feature.

    • @elmalloc
      @elmalloc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      aren't pancake lenses better

  • @jamesordwayultralightpilot
    @jamesordwayultralightpilot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So you made a video flying through a storm? How boring.

  • @khramovantonah
    @khramovantonah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have quest pro and pimax crystal. I like fly on both headsets. Pimax crystal is superb, but i cant fly with it long time. I feel eye strain about their lenses. They sent me replacement ones. Its better , but after syper clear lenses of quest pro its a pain for me. In new pimax light you cant just change bad lenses. You must change whole device if you got it with defect lenses. What about FOV and performance. Quest pro in my opinion have better FOV , because i can use it maximum close to my eyes. May be quest 3 also better here. About resolution. I use quest pro 3400x… and this is good enoigh with taa and 4090 , but what i noticed with pimax. You must use 1/1 full panel resolution if you want maximum sharpness. Because if you make 1% less than native resolution, you got good quality picture. But it dont match full panel resolution sharpness. For crystal must have 4090! Its minimum. Its headset for future. I want 5090 with it. It have huge potential. With quest pro ot quest 3 its ok to use with 4070ti or 4080. I use quest pro in TAA for airliners and other ling flights. I use the Crystal for fun fast flights on extra, spitfire, or any fast airplanes. Usually in dlss quality mode.
    What about eye tracking. I cant use it, because i see this artefacts with my peripheral vision when DFR is active. This artefacts around , when they active also and moving, i can see it too much! For mee FFR without eye tracking its the best solution.
    What about local dimming. For sunset, sunrise and night flights its a MUST ! Thats wy i sold out quest3 and keep quest pro. Quest pro also the most comfortable !
    Sorry for my not perfect English. Im from Latvia.

  • @buzzow
    @buzzow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Would you have imagined this? In the end Pimax brought the Reverb G3.

  • @lordcola-3324
    @lordcola-3324 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    The thing with eye tracking is that where you need it most is in the cheaper headsets. The people buying budget headset are likely using budged PC hardware. They need every bit of performance advantage they can get. So eye tracking is something you especially don't want to remove from budget headsets.

    • @Nobody-Nowhere
      @Nobody-Nowhere 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Let me know one budged headset that has eye tracking?

    • @sirgriffinman
      @sirgriffinman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Nobody-Nowherethat's exactly the problem....

    • @sirgriffinman
      @sirgriffinman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Nobody-NowhereDFR with software and hardware support can give a 50 to 100 percent increase in performance.
      DFR needs to be standardized on ALL HMD's!

    • @mckirkus
      @mckirkus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      More than 100% on PSVR 2 titles that are optimized for eye tracking.

    • @chrispope4296
      @chrispope4296 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This comment is completely off base and as wrong as you can get. Eye tracking and dfr is absolutely needed most especially on the highest pixel count headsets. I have a 4090/7950x3d even I need eye tracking to get the most out of the vr headset.

  • @mjolnirpower2779
    @mjolnirpower2779 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    For the Light an optional add on / upgrade to include eye tracking with DFR would be ideal. Would the £200-300 mark seem about right for this add on (total cost £900-1000). The Vive eye tracking add on model is £280 and the PSVR2 has eye tracking and retails £530, though is a different product and Sony backing / economies of scale etc
    The saving from the Crystal standard coming from no processor, internal storage (256 GB) or battery. And less cooling requirements.

    • @mjolnirpower2779
      @mjolnirpower2779 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Note - I use VR for playing DCS, hence the focus on eye tracking / DFR for being able to side eye MFDs and cross check without having to move the head as much / keep more heads up.

  • @belgeode
    @belgeode 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Me watching this with eye tracking 👀👀👀👀👀👀

  • @szabolcscsengoi4231
    @szabolcscsengoi4231 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would rather go with Imsonium. A dont like the giant hammerhead shark shape.

    • @michalpetrilak3976
      @michalpetrilak3976 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Complete agreement. They didn't bother to design and manufacture a new shape at all. It has nothing to do with a wide angle of horizontal vision, there are headsets that are small and have a much larger angle.

  • @rcpilot9963
    @rcpilot9963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have Quest 3 and i will stick with it unless its failure or really better VR sets will be on the market in the next 2-3 years.

  • @JPsTechReviews
    @JPsTechReviews 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If you have a Varjo Aero, you may be interested in the newest update they just dropped. Image quality from what I can see is a big improvement. honestly, I can't tell a difference between openxr and the Steam VR now.

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Worth a look. Thanks for the heads up.

    • @justinspirational
      @justinspirational 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have an Aero but not used in months.. what's the update?

    • @jamierichards925
      @jamierichards925 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      aeros letterbox fov sucks

    • @JPsTechReviews
      @JPsTechReviews 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sure

    • @jamierichards925
      @jamierichards925 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JPsTechReviews what about my mother 😜🤣

  • @paulmann8675
    @paulmann8675 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Well my reverb g2 11 months old and I love i still love it especially in DCS I also got a new cable from hp for free just incase (little white lie)
    Its the best headset period at the moment and price to replace the reverb g2 and the quest 3 for pc sims especially after the new price today with local dimming
    But for a change I might just sit back and see what happens when the first batch is out I hope it’s a great success and it turns out to be the go to headset for simming like the g2 was
    I just hope the build quality is good enough

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's gone fast Paul. Yes waiting is very wise!

    • @paulmann8675
      @paulmann8675 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know Steve where does the time go Cex are still giving you £136 for reverb g2 which would pay for the local dimming €100 dollar extra
      Can not wait for your proper review I wait in anticipation 😃

    • @sezaiturkmen9561
      @sezaiturkmen9561 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I used to have the Reverb G2, I was very happy with it and then switched to Quest 3. I regretted it every single day! It is an annoying headset as you spend way too much hours on trouble shooting. At first it looks much nicer but stutter is terrible. PS: I have 4080 GPU and only play DCS. Do not buy Quest 3!!!

    • @paulmann8675
      @paulmann8675 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I still have the quest 2 but that just sits there now not really used I feel your pain that’s what the quest 2 was like constant changing

  • @beninkypoo1749
    @beninkypoo1749 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is exactly what I'm looking for, I recently bought a Q3 and really want to see what my 4080 can do. Question, does the Pimax Light have passthrough mode? Looking forward to the settings video for the crystal light!

  • @smsheard
    @smsheard 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would like to have the option to upgrade to eye tracking for a few hundred dollars or something like that.

    • @spatialpro
      @spatialpro 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This!

    • @after6am
      @after6am 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      also would pay for eytracking but not for standalone Accu things

  • @zzzzzzz1zzzzzzzzzz1z
    @zzzzzzz1zzzzzzzzzz1z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hey just tested quest 3 against my vive pro 2. sorry the vp2 wins hands down, i tweaked a lot on the quest 3, tried wifi, tried linked mode.. with openxr override render res.. and my 4090.. but nah, i ll keep my vp2

  • @m0rph3u5.
    @m0rph3u5. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As always a *beautifully informative* breakdown.. I was skeptical about how the Crystal Lite would be worth it without Eye-Tracking (E/T) but you made some really valid points there Steve. I fly mainly in DCS so E/T is really essential. I am happy to some extent that I settled on the which is definitely a huge leap from the Index in almost every aspect (apart from audio) especially when playing games like FO4, Skyrim & HLAlyx untethered, or going through your own creation in unreal engine in VR.
    Like many others, I am really disappointed that Pimax ditched the E/T in the lite but I understand that a lot of folks just do VR swimming and won't be bothered by other titles/usage.
    I am really hyped for the *Crystal Super* which will undoubtedly beat all other high-end VR (if it materializes with no major drawbacks) including Somnium V1 and Varjo XR-4.
    You gotta give it to Pimax for keeping the high-end VR market competitive.

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Best comment so far, really appreciated mate thankyou. It's amazing how spoilt for choice we have suddenly become, especially in the high end market. 50PPD with native foveated rendering in DCS, or even the Somnium VR1 with its own DFR (which is here right now) is going to be a phenomenal experience.

  • @bigrivercod
    @bigrivercod 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have sat on the fence so long about whether to change to VR from TrackIR that my splinters have splinters. So many options, so many pros and cons, so many reported headaches getting VR set up properly. However I think I might bite the bullet and go with Crystal Light …..before the end of 2024 :)

  • @Dragfly7005
    @Dragfly7005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks a lot for another informative video. Do I need Lighthouse faceplate for setting up motion compensation in DOF Reality H3 or a standard set with controllers will be ok? Thanks!

  • @simonoregan4744
    @simonoregan4744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ive been incredibly impressed with the Quest 3 it is my first VR headset. However the USB link comes with major downsides. The biggest of which is the inconsistent META software, its so inconsistent. The compression and artifacts due to the way it connects over USB to my PC. It just adds more complication to an already complicated process, if I can get rid of this, that's my first prize. I'm looking for a decent headset that has a display port connection. I sit in a sim rig mostly. So the cable is not a problem. I was looking at The big Screen and Beyond but I'm loath to spend on outside tracking as well, not to mention the extra set up. The Pimax Lite has come down in weight by 310g so hopefully that will make it more comfortable. Plus the fact that is has inside out tracking. I'm seriously considering the Pimax Lite. I will keep my Quest 3 for standalone and wireless games.

    • @HDRGamingHub
      @HDRGamingHub 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just get the Pico Neo 3 Link, which has a DisplayPort connection. It destroys the Quest 3.

  • @xjrthirteen
    @xjrthirteen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How can you do a 'vs' video when the Crystal light hasn't been released yet? Is it just to be the one who gets it out there first, or are you helping Pimax to drum up those pre-order sales, or both?
    Sorry Steve, but I'm just not feeling this one at all.

    • @Wiserone123
      @Wiserone123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do not understand that the crystal light is the same exact as the original crystal, where it counts in most scenarios. They literally took off every feature except the lenses and base model speakers. You get the same fov, clarity, and the option for local dimming (as of an hour ago). You gotta have some common sense before commenting. I dont even own a pimax and knew this. It was in the announcement video just the other day.

    • @xjrthirteen
      @xjrthirteen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Wiserone123 how do you know it's the same as the crystal, it hasn't been released yet. If you believe everything that Pimax says before a launch... who hasn't got common sense?

  • @SparkySven
    @SparkySven 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video that makes my decision brain cells go wacko. It will be my G2 replacement the Pimax Crystal light once I ever upgrady my GPU just because it's not wireless so yes much more performance and better image and will work with AMD GPU... Can't wait to see your review once you can get your hands on it... then for peeps who do have more money for the VR headset Pimax Crystal with Oled option panel vs the Light.. Why can't Pimax offer the wired non bettery option for the full option Oled Pimax Chrystal? Strange...

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd imagine because there's no way 50PPD is going to run on a mobile chip this side of 2080 lol. Thanks for watching mate, have a fab weekend. Tomahawk video up next!

  • @brianrasmussen2956
    @brianrasmussen2956 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The amount of knowledge in the video(and in the comments) is impressive. Am a simracer, and have only ever had the Oculus Rift. Can anyone tell me what would be a good choice for an upgrade(I'm running a 4090)? After watching this video I'd be tempted to order the Crystal light.

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crystal Light for sure. Especially for Sim Racing. Thanks for watching

    • @brianrasmussen2956
      @brianrasmussen2956 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@VRFlightSimGuy Thank you for your response, and thank you for your brilliant content.

  • @dotnetdevni
    @dotnetdevni 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would a 4080 super 16gb be enough for tbe crystal light

    • @julian-vanilla8379
      @julian-vanilla8379 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      the website says it one of the gpus for the best experience. i used q3 on 4080 and works great

  • @Shinobi-One
    @Shinobi-One 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So I am assuming that prescription lenses that fit the crystal will work on the light also?

  • @matp8493
    @matp8493 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Q3 owner here and a happy one, but I will be looking for an upgrade this year. I'm gonna hold fire with the crystal light and see what somnium come up with before pulling the trigger.

  • @vfrhawk7633
    @vfrhawk7633 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    On the Crystal Light: I'm looking to upgrade from a G2 where the cable just broke a while back (surprise!). Is the local dimming version of the Light the same QLED panel as the non-local dimming version, but with extra backlighting, or is the local dimming version actually the OLED screen? I'm just wondering because of the availability of both versions in the Crystal Pro or whatever they're calling the mega version. Also, I'm using a 3080 so I'm not sure I could drive a Light.

    • @xX_NightShift_Xx
      @xX_NightShift_Xx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      OLED doesn’t need local dimming, as each pixel controls its own brightness. QLED version would be the one with or without Local Dimming

  • @ChipDavis160
    @ChipDavis160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All of this assumes Pimax delivers what they promise and do not cut corners. I am excited for this, hope they hold up their end.

    • @kaecatlady
      @kaecatlady 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree, but I think the advantage for Pimax (and for us) with the Light is that they basically only have to "downgrade" what they already have in the Crystal, listen to the feedback that they've gotten on the Crystal, and just build the damn thing.
      Maybe, since the Light is not being manufactured from "scratch", Pimax will now be able to put more of their focus on more consistent quality control and better Customer Service.

  • @Madaboutstuff
    @Madaboutstuff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think there is still headroom in my Reverb g2. As I'm still running a 3070. I'm thinking once I've upped to a 5080 gpu I'll see what the reverbs limits are and consider the pimax light shortly after.

    • @nicholasfarrow2478
      @nicholasfarrow2478 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have not yet jumped into vr. However, I am thinking the same: buy a 5080gpu, one of the new amd chips and then get the Pimax light. Should be incredible!

    • @Madaboutstuff
      @Madaboutstuff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nicholasfarrow2478 you won't regret it. I can never go back to 2d now😀

  • @Merril_39
    @Merril_39 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doing my due diligence here. I found the pimax crystal lite is still going to be around 650g. The reverb G2 is 550g. FYI

    • @MarcoPietersen
      @MarcoPietersen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can't compare it because windows stopped supporting the G2. And also the second hand prices are plummeting, you can get one for 300 surely.

    • @jamierichards925
      @jamierichards925 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      does t mean anything I use a q3 with bobovrs3 and battery and vr ears and in total it's 1.2kg and I still use it for 5hours at a time no worrys
      as long as you don't have a girls neck it's not a problem lol

  • @Eskoxo
    @Eskoxo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ehh i feel like every youtuber with pimax affiliate links make it slightly biased no offense need reviews after release knowing pimax quality control as far as memory serves every headset they release has problems.

  • @uneCENT
    @uneCENT หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dumb question as I'm brand new to vr. Been using monitors for a while for flight Sim and wanting to explore vr. Strictly for vr, is the pimax lite just as good as the non-lite version? Is a 3090 good enough to deliver a great vr experience?

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Welcome! The main benefit of the standard Crystal is eye tracking, which can boost performance in certain sims such as DCS World. However, for MSFS 2020, it won't make any difference. In terms of clarity, they are both the same. I personally prefer the Light.

    • @uneCENT
      @uneCENT หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VRFlightSimGuy thank you!

  • @liamoliverdarroch6482
    @liamoliverdarroch6482 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi, I have been looking at VR headsets recently for DCS and the occasional bit of war thunder. My main worry right now is whether my computer will be able to handle VR. I have an RTX 3060 and 32 GB of ram, do you know if my computer will handle VR well? And will different headsets put a different load on my machine? Thanks.

  • @Josue_mej
    @Josue_mej 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just received my Crystal, and setup was... well anything but smooth. but after some time I got it all up and running and controllers synced so no problem. I'm coming from a Quest 3 (i9 13900k and an rtx 4080) and I have to say I really was not impressed with the image quality of the crystal. Not sure what I was expecting I guess but I don't think its worth the upgrade from the quest 3 for me. maybe I'm doing something wrong? but I definitely see screen door effect, serious Chromatic aberration on the lens edges and a dark smudge on the bottom right eye I think are dead pixels unfortunately. Really bummed! I truly thought I would be blown away but am seriously considering returning it now. Even with auto IPD, after even a short session my eyes are way more fatigued than I've ever felt after long 3-4 hr sessions in the q3. I didn't have an FPS counter up but xplane12, msfs2020 and DCS ran smooth. but none felt as good as with the quest 3? I'm sure I'm doing something wrong, but its only day 1 so I'm going to play around with it a bit more, but almost 90% sure its going back unfortunately.

  • @Marcin79W
    @Marcin79W 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please, could you do a short FPS comparison (in DCS) : Crystal Light native resolution vs Quest 3 Virtual Desktop Godlike mode?

  • @grimwoody9481
    @grimwoody9481 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is your view on PSVR2? Its getting an official pc breakout box this year.......it has oled screens, eye tracking with foveated rendering & haptics in the headset as well as haptics in the controllers. Could be the the mid ranged {and priced} headset we have been waiting for.

  • @greatkingrat
    @greatkingrat หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this. I have the Reverb G2 and I love it but with 24H2 coming I need another solution, and I think the Crystal Light is going to be the answer.

  • @proxlamuz4591
    @proxlamuz4591 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder how the PSVR2 with the official Sony PC adapter for Flight Sim will be. OLED panels for under $500.

  • @ComdrStew
    @ComdrStew 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gloomy UK? The UK gets like 35-50 days a year of clear skies, lol. I really don't want to deal with Pimax, but as long as you don't have to deal with customer service, you should be fine. This will blow the Quest 3 completely away. There is no reason to buy the Q3, unless you are not going to do PCVR.

  • @Lonsome1223
    @Lonsome1223 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only bummer with the Q3 is that £88 pound cable I've seen tempted to buy the cheaper cables you can get from AMAZON ETC but that would be a false economy i guess.

  • @Kamilo310390
    @Kamilo310390 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it possible to run Pimax Crystal with PC, but without touching the monitor? I know that with pico 4 it was possible (using virtual deaktop), so probably with quest 3 as well. I travel a lot and the space in my suitcase is limited. That's why this question :) I will also add that this will be the last argument deciding which headset I will choose.

  • @jackr.749
    @jackr.749 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Regarding the Crystal Light, until the reviewers get samples (preferably consumer grade, not pre-releases), we won't know. I would imagine the HMD has to go through a serious re-work to get rid of all the stand alone Crystal and make it all work as a pure PCVR HMD. And then there's their software, this also has to be re-worked to ad functionality for both "Light" versions (plain and backlit), so there might be serious growing pains.
    Also, please do not state the Quest 3 HAS very visible SDE, it depends on a person's eyes, personally, I see no SDE in my Quest 3, none, zero. So not all people can see SDE in the Quest 3. I can see very faint SDE in my Reverb G2v2 if I look at something light enough (light blue skies).
    As for Pimax, I wish them well, but they are falling into the same trap as before, too many models of the same thing thus making it a nightmare for support and software (both PC software and HMD firmware).

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just because you cannot see SDE, it does not mean it's not there. I have a very good eye for these things and I'm super critical about image quality as a result. Imagine if I didn't mention SDE just because some people may not spot it! That would not make any sense. Thanks for watching

    • @yornav
      @yornav 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me neither. In order to see the SDE on Quest3 you must really do your best.

    • @jackr.749
      @jackr.749 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VRFlightSimGuy Agreed, but maybe mention "depending on your eyes, you may or may not see SDE, I do see it clearly".
      As stated, everyone eyes, face shape and so on is different, thus why one HMD is great for one person and not so great for the next. :)

    • @DJeb86
      @DJeb86 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ofc there is sde and i will be more critical than vr flight sim guy, it s very noticeable and ruins the overall image quality anytime you will look at far distance object or small details, it s like a grainy filtre that is smashed on you face !!

  • @flyingkiwi57
    @flyingkiwi57 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been told by a Pimax rep that the Crystal Light will not support the upcoming MR Faceplate, for that feature the Crystal Super will be required. That's a major point in favour of the Quest 3.

  • @ajaopify
    @ajaopify 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I knew officially the currently available Crystal, prescription lens inserts fit the Light, I would order the Light right now. I’ve messaged Pimax about this with no response.

  • @lukuxider2000
    @lukuxider2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi there - I am Quest 3 user and thinking about Crystal - do I need controllers and lighthouses to run it in sim racing or MSFS ?

  • @b00rak
    @b00rak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally something affordable for people who can't stand the ugly compression on quest etc. It also has almost double the total resolution of q3 and after you buy all the accessories for q3 the price is pretty close. Total no brainer for sims and people who don't care about wireless.

  • @bennyboo82
    @bennyboo82 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really wish they would've made this wireless, not standalone, but wireless. I can't play standup games with a cable anymore after having a quest. Maybe I'm clumsy but it gets in the way of my fun.

  • @robertoates7452
    @robertoates7452 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only real selling point is it's tethered, unfortunately it seems to lack color passthrough and eye tracking which are featured in other similarly priced headsets: Quest 3, Pico 4, PSVR2. Hopefully, Pi will make an Eye tracked Crystal Light+

  • @tattoodude8946
    @tattoodude8946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another thing I found crazy is that the Quest 3 with a third party, battery inclusive head strap is pretty much the same weight as the Pimax Crystal Light! This shocked me since the CL is just huge to look at and I was really concerned about the extra weight. Then someone brought up the fact that the most popular replacement head strap is the Bobo VR with the battery (which I have - though not the very newest one) so I weighed it myself and found that, with the battery, it's basically one KG!

  • @eugenecia9424
    @eugenecia9424 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the Pimax is great, but I won't buy one because the fov is much too narrow. I think it's too noticeable with Flight Sims and racing sims, but with regular games I think that problem is less noticeable.

  • @MrBreakthompson
    @MrBreakthompson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds great, but I really don't like Pimax as a company or trust the products they deliver..

  • @meepcheep314
    @meepcheep314 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You get what you pay for... of course the Pimax Crystal Light is going to be better and the price happens to reflect that

  • @HDRGamingHub
    @HDRGamingHub 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pico Neo 3 Link is better than Quest 3, never mind the upcoming Crystal Light.

  • @Fieskmask
    @Fieskmask 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First of all, than you for the video.
    Second, I'm coming from basically no VR at all, just tried some Reverb G1 Enterprise from a friend and that sweetspot was awful, you didn't see s**t. After that I watched your video about Quest 3 along with MSFS and you praised it, I bought it the other day and was so shocked that the clarity was all over the FOV pretty much.
    Now, I'm really happy with the Quest 3 and the Flight Simulators visual is limited on my PC since I only got a 3080 but looking at the 5090 when it arrives which lead me to my last question:
    How much will the difference in quality actually be if I use Quest 3 with USB-C (Link Cable) or another headset with DP cable directly into my GPU? I have actually no plan of buying another VR headset for a while but will be upgrading to a new computer or just looking to upgrade to a 5090 later this year.

  • @TheEdmaster87
    @TheEdmaster87 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can we use the crystal light on any game besides driving and flying sims? How long is the cables on crystal light for a little movement for those rpg or action games?

  • @dathyr1
    @dathyr1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new PIMAX headsets sound very good, but I will wait and see what the users and reviewers say when they get their hands on the final release product.
    I am in no hurry to get a new VR headset because I do have the Quest 3. I use it for SIM racing and is connected via the USB Link Cable. Love the clarity, resolution, and wide sweet spot. The only thing I can not do is connect my Quest 3 to a graphics card display port.
    So again, I will wait to see what all you say about the new headsets after release date.
    Thanks for the video and take care.

  • @brandonchappell1535
    @brandonchappell1535 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    " god, that was a mouthful!!" Is, according to legend, EXACTLY, what she said !! 😂😂

  • @crimsom2977
    @crimsom2977 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pimax is never the answer, their products and software are broken beyond usability.

  • @lurchilurch5507
    @lurchilurch5507 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't get it.. How can you compare comfort of Q3 vs Crystal Light when the latter hasn't been released yet? Or did they send you a premarket version?

  • @ArthurYouT
    @ArthurYouT หลายเดือนก่อน

    i'm more into sim racing but i think i can assume the reasons would apply to sim racing also

  • @WillisKeeper
    @WillisKeeper 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I did ONE preorder in my life. That was the Reverb G2 and that turned out such a desaster...I am done with preorders.

    • @VNAV_PTH
      @VNAV_PTH 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never pre-ordered in my life. The only time I wished I had pre-ordered was in 2020 when Nvidia's CEO showcased the one and only RTX3000-series GPU they apparently had in stock.

  • @othmanfikrii
    @othmanfikrii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello man love ur vids , tell pymax eye tracking is essential , they f....d up big time , and no ffr does not cut it !!

  • @JDVVV378
    @JDVVV378 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see a lot of videos from the pimax chrystal and it’s a hell to set up, I curious about the set up
    Of the light. The quest 3 is easy to install 👌

  • @68sixgun
    @68sixgun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm still loving my quest pro, blows my g2 away and super comfy using the g2 headstrap.

    • @djhindsight
      @djhindsight 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are using a G2 head strap with the Quest pro?

    • @68sixgun
      @68sixgun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@djhindsight Yes, fits perfectly.

    • @djhindsight
      @djhindsight 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@68sixgun I didn’t know that!

    • @68sixgun
      @68sixgun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@djhindsight It's from Studioform Creative.

  • @andrealioce4341
    @andrealioce4341 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I've recently bought a quest 3 so at the moment I'm fine: I cannot change a VR headset every 6 months!

  • @gerardsitja
    @gerardsitja 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will get it, but just after the first batch is out just in case... We all know Pimax.

  • @jasonknights9640
    @jasonknights9640 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    im becoming enclined i think to go with the BSB as the core light id want local dimming and then the price is around bsb and i hate the size of pimax, althoughhi still consider an aero even if they are discontinued. problem is you haveto buy before you try which sucks really as you cant know and viewing is personal.

  • @nrosko
    @nrosko 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Their website is not exactly informative about various options.

  • @DJeb86
    @DJeb86 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I should have waited before buying the quest3 :/

  • @ittybitbobo7657
    @ittybitbobo7657 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Every video i have seen the crystal sucks

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out reviews from the sim community then ;)

  • @michaelsims77
    @michaelsims77 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unfortunately if anyone can screw it up it’s pimax!

  • @a.common.American
    @a.common.American 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You seem to be dancing around the two so closely I'm convinced you're just shilling for Pimax which makes it difficult for me to regard this review.

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Keep on trolling. I appreciate the comments for the algorithm

    • @a.common.American
      @a.common.American 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@VRFlightSimGuy It's genuine feedback brother! I'm watching your quest 3 V66 video now too. Nothing against you, if you don't want to take the feedback that's fine. But that's how the review came off to me, didn't stop me from ingesting more info and value from you

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@a.common.American I can assure you all my opinions are always my own on this channel. Thankyou for the support.

    • @a.common.American
      @a.common.American 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@VRFlightSimGuy New to your channel and blown through 10+ at this point you seem to crank out the most content. I do see now you're pretty fair is fair and call it out when needed on a variety of products. This was just feedback from my very first time seeing you.
      At this time, is the VR1 probably worth holding out for? I keep running into cons that seem to matter on damn near every other headset including pimax (stability/software issues unless that's been patched)

  • @kevinbrook7033
    @kevinbrook7033 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good overview Steve, the Crystal light should be an exciting addition for sure.
    A potential series idea for you. How about doing a VR simmers upgrading guide, and giving your thoughts on the various non HMD upgrade options, GPUs, PC's, motion platforms, flight peripherals etc.
    For example, would you rather use a Quest 3 with a H2 motion platform, or have a Crystal Light without one? Or do you think a better yoke, throttle or rudder pedal setup should be the next step up for a G2 or Quest 3 owner that doesn't have them yet over a new HMD.
    These are the kind of real world questions I wrestle with. I like the idea of the Crystal Light a lot, but it's likely to cost close to a £1000 for the local dimming version for me, which is a long way towards a H2 platform, so maybe better to spend on that and keep my Quest Pro for longer.
    Others might have a 3080 level card and might be wondering if they should get a Crystal Light or a 4080/4090, or maybe hold fire until the 5000 series cards launch in a few months.
    It would be interesting to know what your core essential setup is now, the parts of your setup that would be first draft picks so to speak.
    Keep up the good work mate!

  • @SpringChickensOnlyMan
    @SpringChickensOnlyMan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We all already know I’m gonna buy pimax crystal light. Forget the DPVR E4

  • @Simlife101
    @Simlife101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The issue is this headset is made for people who cant or wont spend over £1500 on headset but you need a big GPU to run it and if you have to turn down the resolution then the better image over the quest.

    • @Szabby999
      @Szabby999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PCVR is an expensive hobby, shouldn't be a surprise. The better you want the more you have to pay. You won't get high quality experience for a cheap price (only in your dreams) nor in VR devices, neither in any other segments of life.

  • @Shalashaska111
    @Shalashaska111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @VRFlightSimGuy
    A more detailed written comparison between the Quest 3 and VR1 lenses would be much appreciated.
    Very interesting that you say the Q3 pancakes are better than the VR1 dual aspheric. In what ways is that so?

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More VR1 content soon, thanks for watching!

  • @cowansimstudio
    @cowansimstudio 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We simply do not have the pc components to justify the Crystal headsets. as soon as they are plugged in you realise your system cannot run the resolution and end up turning the res down

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can turn the resolution down slightly (3500x4142) and it still looks absolutely amazing, giving you something to look forward to as GPU's mature :)

  • @alecclapperton834
    @alecclapperton834 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video as always. I am really tempted with the light. I have the Quest 3 and have been well and truly bitten by the bug. Hopefully the 3070ti will give a relatively good performance until I can afford to upgrade to 4070ti Super. I could get a 4090 but that is likely to take years to get the funds together

    • @SETHalpine
      @SETHalpine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nvidia still on Display Port 1.4a... Fail...Even the 4090 still don't have the last DP2.1...Hard to displays 2X9Mp at 90hz....without massive compression so...
      AMD Display Port 2.0...Win...

  • @acratone8300
    @acratone8300 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Through the bullhorn: What do we want! All the features! How do we want it? Cheap!

  • @lukeconsumerofcontent
    @lukeconsumerofcontent 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm curious to see how challenging it would be to get the crystal light to work in monado, considering it has support for lighthouse tracking.

  • @SweViver
    @SweViver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lots of good points Steve, great video! Im saying this as a VR enthusiast myself, not as a Pimax employee (which I am of course), but this is the first time I can honestly say that this Pimax headset is a no-brainer. Maybe not as much for the DCS guy, but for most other gaming and simming. Cheers!

    • @ACDC84016
      @ACDC84016 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because of the lack of eye tracking?

    • @stonech4t
      @stonech4t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why not DCS?

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Martin I really appreciate it. This is such a brilliant move by Pimax and I can't wait to get my hands on it. Best wishes.

    • @khaledassaf6356
      @khaledassaf6356 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stonech4t Due to the lack of eye tracking. DCS benefits massively from DFR.

    • @after6am
      @after6am 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@khaledassaf6356 link for measuring without/with ET please, Thanks!

  • @KiloCharlieVR
    @KiloCharlieVR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video Steve, I have been using the Quest 3 for two months or so and been very happy with it (especially considering I came from a Rift CV1😂) but I have to admit this Crystal Light seems a no brainer so I’ll be following this quite close up. Love from Belgium !

  • @Caswell_Official
    @Caswell_Official 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the Crystal accessories (face cover, top strap, etc) work with the Light?

  • @MarcoPietersen
    @MarcoPietersen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But what about the Quest 3 passthrough? Wouldn't that help the vrr flyer with all the map reading?

    • @VRFlightSimGuy
      @VRFlightSimGuy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a great point I totally forgot about that!

  • @justinspirational
    @justinspirational 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you prefer the crystal over the varjo aero these days? Didn't the aero drop in price to only $990? Is it worth getting a crystal when I have the aero already? I've been waiting on the pimax 12k qled for ages based on their promise to part trade in my 8kx for it but don't know if that will ever happen

  • @buikhan
    @buikhan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You got pimax light to test already?

  • @melvilib
    @melvilib 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you did mention it, I missed it. Will the Pimax Crystel Light version have compatability with an add-on option for passthrough? Promised for the full version but not looking likely anytime soon.

  • @Leynad778
    @Leynad778 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Crystal just needs a 4090 and MSFS 2024 might even something better I guess. My 4080 matches well with the Quest 3, so I'm not going for the Light yet.

    • @SETHalpine
      @SETHalpine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A 4090 or a RX7900XTX...
      Nvidia still on Display Port 1.4a... Fail...to displays 2X9Mp at 90hz....without DSC and compression...
      AMD Display Port 2.1...Win...
      It's better to wait if you've already a Q3 or a Pico4...

    • @Leynad778
      @Leynad778 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SETHalpine VR performs better with RTX and 5 months ago this channel was confirming it as well, but seems more of a driver-issue with AMD. I have a Pico 4 as well and IMO the Quest 3 beats it quite a bit, especially if using higher bitrates with a link-cable or Steam Link with it's FFR.

  • @outspoken78
    @outspoken78 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello! I'm running a RX6800 xt with an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and 32gs ram. I'm currently using an Oculas Quest 2 through Virtual Desktop and would like to upgrade. I mostly use it for Microsoft Flight Simulator. My goal is good, clear visuals. What headset would you recommend that would work best with my setup.

    • @maoh1772
      @maoh1772 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Switched from Quest 2 to 3 and this gave me a huge improvement for DCS and Il2. You will need to invest in a better headstrap and link cable.
      If you got the money to spare, go for it if your GPU is good enough. I run it via a Nvidia 4070 super