4K Review: Seven Samurai (BFI) | Does Dolby Vision make this BFI release a must-buy over Criterion?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @awesomereviews1561
    @awesomereviews1561 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I had both until a two days ago. I sold my Criterion. The Criterion has less visible damage ( better restoration) but the BFI contrast is so much better. The movie looks more alive. And it’s much more noticeable than the difference in damaged frames. For me it was an easy choice.

  • @PrimeMover93
    @PrimeMover93 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The BFI disc not only has Dolby Vision HDR but also has a higher bitrate and better compression. It’s hands down the definitive 4K release.

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PrimeMover93 Thanks for the info!!

    • @tuc0339
      @tuc0339 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Although the subtitles are very different and Criterion did extensive damage repair, more than BFI. So I would say it is a preference thing which one is definitive.

    • @awesomereviews1561
      @awesomereviews1561 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@tuc0339 The Criterion has less damaged frame for sure, but the BFI contrast is much better and it’s much more noticeable.

    • @tuc0339
      @tuc0339 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@awesomereviews1561Do you have both or are you trusting the caps? The contrast is not wildly different but the BFI does go a bit far with black crush. The Criterion is a bit flat in comparison for sure but it is more a preference thing with this one as I'm sure many will appreciate the extensive damage repair. It's a bit of a trade off between them.

  • @kingdude1999
    @kingdude1999 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I have the criterion blu-ray. And, if they would've added more special features & updated the booklet in the criterion, then I would've gone for it. But, I bought the BFI instead because of the special features and addition of a new commentary track. I have the original BFI Blu-ray & there's no commentary track. So, that's why I got it instead. Plus, the new book. So, I'll be having a Kurosawa binge very soon.
    Just started with Rashomon & watched my BFI Seven Samurai. Tonight's entertainment will be Throne of Blood.

  • @leeturton9254
    @leeturton9254 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Reminds me of the close encounters blu ray I bought year's ago with the cool booklet and poster...still my favourite release

  • @CaryStegall
    @CaryStegall หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I finished the Criterion last night, it's obviously the best it has ever looked for home video up until now. I may add the BFI version also. Just having a different commentary and extras is worth the cost. For those who can't play content from other regions, you need to get an all region player now while you still can. You can thank me in 2035.

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CaryStegall Goad you enjoyed the Criterion 4K, and totally agree that region-free is the way to be! Thanks for watching.

  • @robsavage3217
    @robsavage3217 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review. I ordered this one from Amazon in the U.K. and it should arrive at my home in Canada this week. I'm looking forward to it.
    I won't be able to access the locked Blu-ray but that's OK - I knew that when I placed my order, as I already own the BFI's 4K editions of the Seventh Seal and the Elephant Man. Regardless, I wanted the BFI version of Seven Samurai because I hate the Criterion packaging and I already own Criterion's Blu-rays, which have more than I need when it comes to extra features.
    By the way, that thicker plastic case is the standard size for Blu-rays from Europe. 😀

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      YES! Of course they are the standard Europe cases, lol. I didn't even think about that, but do have multiple in my collection, haha! Anyway, thanks for that, and I hope you enjoy your copy once it arrives! Thanks again, Rob!

  • @ben99ny69
    @ben99ny69 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I did not think about the special features being on a bluray and region locked. That sucks but I've never saw special features but for this film I might've.

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, that’s the only real downside of this release. The Criterion bonus features are comparable, though, so it may be the better way to go if you do care about the bonus features. Thanks!

    • @ben99ny69
      @ben99ny69 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Cinefessions Honestly maybe. I don't care for special feature though as i never once watched them (nor read any of them booklets). But i love this film and there are hours of special features.

  • @heartofcinema3454
    @heartofcinema3454 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    being in Uk, i have the old criterion blu ray and brought the 4k BFI on Saturday. Happy. The poster is going up during xmas.

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s great! It’s a beautiful poster. Thanks for watching!

  • @hblanche
    @hblanche หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The BFI release states that it has an updated and improved set of subtitles; which is especially important to someone like me who doesn't understand Japanese. Does the Criterion release have this too?

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@hblanche As far as I can tell, the subtitles on the Criterion 4K release are the same as they were on the Criterion Blu-ray release (someone may be able to confirm that who has both, though). The reason the BFI release advertises updated and improved subtitles is because it was one of the criticisms of their past release of the film. So for this 4K, they’ve updated them. I didn’t mention it in the review, but I’d still take the Criterion subtitle track over the BFI track, if I could put together my own release, but the BFI subtitles were sufficient. Great question, thanks!

    • @awesomereviews1561
      @awesomereviews1561 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I had both. The Criterion subtitles are very simplified, more American. The BFI is closer to the original Japanese. Both are good in their own way. But the contrast of the BFI is much better than the Criterion one. So I kept the BFI.

    • @hblanche
      @hblanche 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@awesomereviews1561 Thanks. Glad I preordered by BFI version months ago. Watching it in the next couple of days.

  • @moomcmoosson1992
    @moomcmoosson1992 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Like you i've got the best of both worlds. I'v got the old Criterion Blu-Ray and the new BFI 4K.

  • @MrCREWCRUSHIN95
    @MrCREWCRUSHIN95 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    BFI - contrast is better, Criterion blacks are more charcol grey

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great to know! Thanks for the input, and the comment!

  • @TokuAndAnimationNewsNetwork
    @TokuAndAnimationNewsNetwork หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never heard of BFI before.
    Not sure I care enough about HDR to buy this one, but I do like the booklet and that it comes in an actual case rather than a digipack.

  • @Antonio311072
    @Antonio311072 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I have both copies on 4K the BFI version looks better.

    • @Cinefessions
      @Cinefessions  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great to know! Thanks for sharing, and for watching.

    • @Chrisratata
      @Chrisratata หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is it an extra $20-$30 better?

    • @moomcmoosson1992
      @moomcmoosson1992 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Chrisratata That will probably depend on how much of a fan of the movie you are. Criterion are nowadays sadly notorious for their very middling and sometimes terrible encodes because they refuse to work with a (more) competent encoding vendor.

    • @awesomereviews1561
      @awesomereviews1561 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Chrisratata in Europe the BFI is also cheaper than the Criterion one ( about 29 euros) so it’s an easy choice. I don’t know if it’s 30 bucks better for an US customer but the contrast is clearly much better on the BFI one.

  • @kingdude1999
    @kingdude1999 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Don't watch the remake of The Magnificent Seven. Watch the original from 1960. The remake with Denzel & Chris Pratt is crap