Eyes and Ears of the Wehrmacht | Sd.Kfz.221 Leichter Panzerspähwagen (M.G.)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
  • The German Kfz.13, although an initial success as the first serially produced armored car, lacked armor and any fighting capabilities and was never intended for combat use. This led to the need for a new armored car that would be built on a new standard chassis common to all kinds of other German armored vehicles. The Sd.Kfz.221 was first developed in 1934 and was a completely new design with many modern features at that time. It was meant for frontline service, acting as a reconnaissance vehicle together with radio-equipped vehicles. However, with thin armor and armed with only a machine gun, it could do very little in combat, even in 1939. Therefore, the production of the Sd.Kfz.221 was stopped and emphasis was laid on newer armored cars. In the end, it was still in service around 1943 due to a low supply of reconnaissance vehicles, with many regular 221s converted into radio or command vehicles.
    Join this channel to get access to exclusive perks:
    / @tanksencyclopediayt
    If you liked this video, please consider donating on Patreon or Paypal!
    Patreon: / tankartfund
    Paypal: www.paypal.com...
    Article: tanks-encyclop...
    Sources:
    D. Doyle (2005). German military Vehicles, Krause Publications
    H. Scheibert (1993) German Light Reconnaissance Vehicles, Schiffer Publishing
    I. Hogg (1975) German Artillery Of World War Two, Purnell Book Services
    T.L. Jentz and H.L. Doyle (2005) Panzer Tracts No.13-1 Panzerspahwagen
    J. Milson and P. Chamberlain (1974) German Armored Cars of World War Two, Arms and Armor Press
    D. Nešić, (2008), Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka, Beograd
    T. Anderson (2017) History of Panzerjager Volume 1 1939-42, Osprey Publishing
    P. Chamberlain and H. Doyle (1978) Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two - Revised Edition, Arms and Armor Press.
    B. Perrett (2008) German Armored Cars and Reconnaissance Half-Tracks 1939-45. Osprey Publishing
    B. Perrett (2005) German Armored Cars and Reconnaissance Half-Tracks, Osprey Publishing
    P. P. Battistelli (2007) Panzer Divisions The Blitzkrieg Years 1939-40, Osprey Publishing
    Reddit: / tankencyclopedia
    TE Shop: www.tanks-encyc...
    Our website: www.tanks-encyc...
    Gaming News Website: www.tanks-encyc...
    Facebook: / tanksencyclopedia
    Twitter: / tanksenc
    Discord: / discord
    Email: tanks.encyclopedia@gmail.com
    An article by Marko Pantelic and Johannes Dorn
    Script by Stan Lucian
    Narrated by Elrebelde
    Edited by Mace.exe
    Sound edited by Gabe

ความคิดเห็น • 134

  • @hamishneilson7140
    @hamishneilson7140 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    This is another perfect example to use to counter the argument that the T-34 pioneered sloped armour. Especially since a lot of the examples people use aren’t as noticeable as this.

  • @mattbowden4996
    @mattbowden4996 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    Aside from the lack of a radio, the SdKfz 221 was pretty much the perfect WW2 scout car. It's size, weight, armour and armament are all virtually identical to the post war British Ferret scout car, which had a very long and successful career. With an improved engine and a sufficiently compact radio (something that admittedly did not exist in the 1930s) there really would have been no reason to replace the 221 for light reconnaissance duties, but I guess the Germans really wanted that 20mm cannon.

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  ปีที่แล้ว +41

      The 222 not only had a different gun, but a whole different chassis. And yeah, it is hard to tell from the outside. We'll cover that at some point

    • @andreasbeyer7715
      @andreasbeyer7715 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@TanksEncyclopediaYT The chassis of the light 4x4 armoured cars is actually the same for the early type and again for the later type. The main difference is the size of the armoured body. Which was much smaller for the 221 than for 222 and 223. With the 221 lacking firepower the supporting "Kanonen-Wagen" (gun car) became the more important vehicle for the troops after the begin of the war, and took the role. You mentioned there was no radio at all, which is not totally correct. From 1941 on a Fu.Spr.Ger. a with a range of 1km was installed. It would have been good to mention, that behind the commander there was sufficient space for a third person only in case of need. MG 13 may have had a Doppeltrommelmagazin or a curved magazin.

    • @markopantelic3088
      @markopantelic3088 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@andreasbeyer7715Hey Andreas those informations are actually listed in the written article itself. Which you can read fully on our website. But thanks for point out these facts! Author.

    • @smaragd1238
      @smaragd1238 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@andreasbeyer7715 The first part is correct what you say, however all the other aspects you named are in the actual article on the website

    • @jon9021
      @jon9021 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No radio?…pretty much useless then. Doesn’t matter how good it may have been at it’s assigned job.

  • @StacheMan26
    @StacheMan26 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Other than the lack of even a short range radio, I'd say the 221 was a perfectly adequate reconnaissance vehicle for the 1930's... Well, at least for the conditions of Western Europe.
    Also, it is exceptionally cute for an AFV, so bonus points there.

  • @HereticalKitsune
    @HereticalKitsune ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Those are my favorites, I just love the lines of the 221 and 251 variants. Half tracks or wheeled.
    Also good German pronounciation!

  • @lyrooo326
    @lyrooo326 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I just lost my job as a dump truck mechanic but I will comment and leave a like to help with the TH-cam algorithm because I truly appreciate these videos.

  • @tekis0
    @tekis0 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow. I've been watching this channel from its beginning. The overall quality of this video really shines! There's more information, more photos, figures and great narration. Thank-you.

    • @purpleldv966
      @purpleldv966 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm... I would point out the banging on the table as being in conflict with your impression of quality.

  • @markkringle9144
    @markkringle9144 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A decent vehicle, should have gone with thicker side armor and the 20 or 37mm gun with machine gun. They always say, "not for front line use" but if it's got a gun or heavy machine gun, it's gonna end up in an infantry support role. Chaos happens and you have to use what you have.

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or they could have gone the other way around and not arm it at all. The chassis couldn't have taken a 37 mm anyhow and was not that amazing.

  • @timothywood4402
    @timothywood4402 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great job as always guys

  • @PUBHEAD1
    @PUBHEAD1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, thanks so much for this. Been looking to research this little vehicle for quite some time.

  • @ScreamingSturmovik
    @ScreamingSturmovik ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the arguments for vehicles becoming "obsolete" almost always has nothing to do with their intended role, the best recon is when the enemy didn't even know you were there.
    almost every armoured car is judged by the fact it's not a tank which is kinda why things like the M8, Daimler and AEC came along (although M8 was a early tank destroyer technically) it's like asking why your 65hp single seat scout plane can't dog fight a BF-109s or shoot down Ju-88s

  • @alessiodecarolis
    @alessiodecarolis ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Pratically it was a counterpart of the Daimler AC, two man crew, a single LMG, the only difference being the lack of a turret in the British vehicle(at least in early versions).

    • @23GreyFox
      @23GreyFox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@obsidianjane4413 Good joke. The Daimler had only 20hp more than the 221 and had only 12.5hp/ton, while the 221 had 19.5hp/ton. And no part reached 30mm, the best i could find was 16mm. Armor thickness was nearly the same on both. Only the fire power was better compared to the 221, but with the 222 even that was not the case anymore.

    • @23GreyFox
      @23GreyFox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@obsidianjane4413 Daimler AC and the Daimler Dingo are not the same. He wrote AC, not SC. Your last senseless comment back to you. So much to thinking...

  • @basichistory
    @basichistory ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I enjoyed this video well done

  • @johnlansing2902
    @johnlansing2902 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nicely done , thank you for covering a mostly ignored area of military vehicles .

  • @jonathanbaron-crangle5093
    @jonathanbaron-crangle5093 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had one of these in 1:35 scale, & also the Sd.Kfz (SonderKraftfahrzeug, Special Purpose Vehicle) 222, both from Tamiya.
    Hope you'll be doing some history on the 8-wheelers, the Puma especially.
    10:00 the 2.8cm rifle was a squeeze-bore weapon, using tungsten shot

  • @mdkd99
    @mdkd99 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    very nice video!
    It was a neat scouting car, but the very thin armor was a problem, even in Poland and France, and the armament was at best good to fight infantry. Afaik these were also supposed to be used in combination with the sd kfz 222 and sd kfz 223. But yeah, later on, the sd kfz 222 was favored, as it has the 2cm Kwk and better armor.

    • @sirrathersplendid4825
      @sirrathersplendid4825 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 221 also had a poorer engine than the 222, which made it struggle offroad.

  • @jimsquire9048
    @jimsquire9048 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Germans had some "forgive the term" sexy vehicles. All the angles and slopes make them look sharp. Funny how the 22's and puma resemble the mine resistant vehicles of today.

    • @MXB2001
      @MXB2001 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks. Our warships are similarly sexy. However it never did translate to the planes. The one exception being the exceptional 262.

    • @jimsquire9048
      @jimsquire9048 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MXB2001 I agree. I have models of Scharnhorst, Graf Zepplin, a couple Bismarck's and my favorite Prinz Eugen. I love heavy cruisers. I must also say that I do like some of your planes. The BF 109, FW 190 and HE 111 to name a few. I even admire the blunt "in your face" style of the Stuka. With it's bent wings it must have looked like a bird of prey diving down. It's non retracting landing gear the claws outstretched.

  • @ThommyofThenn
    @ThommyofThenn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    O man I didn't know you had a youtube channel. I'm gonna be watching a lot of your videos in the near future if you have more light armour videos from this era.

  • @alepaz1099
    @alepaz1099 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A scout car without a radio...
    🤷‍♂

  • @slimrummy4616
    @slimrummy4616 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    WAIT ... At 10:36 is that a panther with a late panzer 4 turret on it? .. is that a real picture? ... Ps awesome video the 222 is my favorite vehicle from WW2

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes.

    • @scipioafricanus4328
      @scipioafricanus4328 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I read somewhere the panther with the pz4 turret was a one-off field conversion of a damaged panther to a command vehicle. The 222 is one of my favourite as well. Great video on its predecessor.

    • @JGCR59
      @JGCR59 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Schwere Panzerjäger Abteilung 653 (normally equipped with Ferdinand/Elefant) was notorious for using weird field conversions used this one as a command vehicle. It also had a Flakpanzer T-34 and used probably the only Porsche Tiger to see frontline service as a Befehlspanzer. The Panther with a Panzer IV turret originated as Bergepather recovery vehicle

  • @jumpferjoy1st
    @jumpferjoy1st ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel there is such a need for something similar in this day and age. An armoured car using as much mainstream mechanicals as possible to reduce cost. A performance similar of 55mph-ish and range of 250 miles. A body of similar design that will deflect mine explosions, plus give angled armour protection against incoming rounds. A turret ring that could even include a .50cal or 30mm autocannon or AT missiles. Keeping it with a crew of two will ensure the size isn't too big. Have weight distribution slightly in favour of the rear, so if either of the front wheels are blown off, the vehicle can remain mobile. It would be a highly cost effective and mobile option for many armies of the world.

  • @nanoreaper5002
    @nanoreaper5002 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was the first Armor Model I ever built

  • @crapphone7744
    @crapphone7744 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would you ever have a chassis that you want to use universally for scouting and light armored vehicles that has only has only a 75 horsepower engine? Even in the 1930s that's pathetically inadequate.

  • @JamesLaserpimpWalsh
    @JamesLaserpimpWalsh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice vid man. Good job.

  • @purpleldv966
    @purpleldv966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The way this gentleman speaks reminds me of Sheldon Cooper. :)

  • @homunculous007
    @homunculous007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Terrific video. Great images and well presented. Particularly good for scale modelers.
    With regard to North Africa, I built a model 222 (Tamiya) that had DAK decals. Curious.
    Thanks again.

  • @jensleck547
    @jensleck547 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Spähwagen oder Aufklärungsfahrzeuge of the Germans looking out of time, as if they come directly from the future. I love the German design🖖

  • @justinreilly6619
    @justinreilly6619 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From an aesthetics perspective, I think this looks like a great vehicle! 👍

  • @lanceschaerer6875
    @lanceschaerer6875 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Considering when it was designed and put yo use I'd say it was definitely useful and better than what the Allies were fielding at the time.

  • @derrickstorm6976
    @derrickstorm6976 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Very cool video. I'm only now piecing together how much material Germany already lost in invading Poland
    I'd say like most German designs, it would have been a good vehicle if the war had started ~5 years earlier. They dominated the Spanish civil war but soon after '39 proved they should have already had at least very upgraded models with them, and things like the Stuka had just been entirely nullified outside already controlled airspace which requires the enemy to have zero aircraft in ww2 conditions

    • @michaelschmid9567
      @michaelschmid9567 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yeah, the Poland campaign was an expensive learning for the Wehrmacht. Lost and learned so much, for example that tanks should not fight inside a city.
      The Germans also used near all of there munition, what resulted in the "Munitionskriese", and they needed month to produce it. If the French and/or the British would have attacked Germany in these month, the Wehrmacht would have nothing to shoot back.

  • @Mikedadof2
    @Mikedadof2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sick information, thanks

  • @matscaife9014
    @matscaife9014 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Beltway Bandits Mat 👍🪘

  • @stefanebert7171
    @stefanebert7171 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your German is very impressive! Great channel! Best from Hamburg, Germany

  • @looneybatemanscotch2579
    @looneybatemanscotch2579 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks really cool

  • @chuckhaggard1584
    @chuckhaggard1584 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since I started my career as a scout using a jeep with an M60 machine gun on a pintle mount, I don't really consider the 221 to be underarmored at all. Significantly better armor than a M151, and a better GPMG as well.

  • @jayfelsberg1931
    @jayfelsberg1931 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Was the "universal chassis" part of the development of the "Schelle Program?"
    The SdKfz 221 seems like a useful step in the development of German armored cars, which bore much fruit as the war progressed. The SdKfz 222 series was much more successful. While the six-wheeled vehicles were not a success, the 8x8 vehicles were quite good.

  • @JGCR59
    @JGCR59 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2 or 3 of these would be the only armored vehicles of a standard german infantry division at the beginning of the war.

  • @littlebull8881
    @littlebull8881 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought I knew my stuff, wow excellent work 👏🏻

  • @nickysimi9866
    @nickysimi9866 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wonder if a racketenwerfer 43 could have been mounted on the sd.kfz.221

  • @mcormier3934
    @mcormier3934 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This armored scout car is better than ANY bently

  • @nunyabidniz2868
    @nunyabidniz2868 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's an oxymoron! Both sonder und leichter! It's two, 2 great spahwagens in one! [Maybe a Reese's peanutbutter cup camo paint job is in order?] 😄

  • @markfutchll8141
    @markfutchll8141 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think it looks cool

  • @mariobosnjak99
    @mariobosnjak99 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    75 hp for 4 tonnes is insane. Im guessing they tried to get as much torque out of it as possible

  • @Eulemunin
    @Eulemunin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lovely little vehicle, just needed a smaller and powerful radio. Which did not exist in sufficient numbers.

  • @tihlsteinig2465
    @tihlsteinig2465 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good compromise!

  • @jensnimike176
    @jensnimike176 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well done!

  • @stoneylonesome4062
    @stoneylonesome4062 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You’d think it would’ve been faster, given that they mounted the Wankel Rotary engines literally inside the wheels.

  • @Typing.._
    @Typing.._ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes we only produce civilian vehicle … with slight modifications to the body work

  • @jameswyre6480
    @jameswyre6480 ปีที่แล้ว

    A show on ww2 armored car tactics in actual practice would be excellent.

  • @nomcarver4436
    @nomcarver4436 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Or as a warthunder player might call it, “baby puma”

  • @P4Tri0t420
    @P4Tri0t420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ZWEIHUNDRED :D
    Denglish intensified

  • @theidahotraveler
    @theidahotraveler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the car i would buy if i was rich

  • @akaroth7542
    @akaroth7542 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing is aesthetic AF

  • @mosesracal6758
    @mosesracal6758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The guy tripping in 11:27 is funny lol

  • @SHAd0Eheart
    @SHAd0Eheart ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to admit that until now I had assumed those radio antennas were just hand bars to hold on to over rough terrain. 😳 I guess I never gave it much though but still I’m rather embarrassed.

  • @SARGE11963
    @SARGE11963 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good interim vehicle until the Sdkfz 222 came into service. It only soldiered on for as long as it did because Germany needed everything it could get it's hands on for the war.

  • @damirsirotic052
    @damirsirotic052 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My little tank from Lieutenant Gruber.

  • @dudududu1926
    @dudududu1926 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would you build a recon car with no radio. That's like the most important part...

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because radios were big, fragile, finicky and very expensive.
      You still need recon, so you have a radio car in the back, send these out, then they come back and report.

    • @tonyrobinson362
      @tonyrobinson362 ปีที่แล้ว

      My favourite model to build the 222 thankyou for showing the other side not just the big cats.

  • @slobodanmitic1354
    @slobodanmitic1354 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That wire mash protection looks rather ineffective. Aside from the fact it does not cover the entire turret roof, what happens if a hand grenade lands on top of the mash without bouncing of it? I guess it can't protect anyone in that case...

    • @TanksEncyclopediaYT
      @TanksEncyclopediaYT  ปีที่แล้ว

      If it lands on the mesh, it still does damage, but far less than if it had gone inside the car.

    • @kaineuhauser9353
      @kaineuhauser9353 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Driver survive

    • @MXB2001
      @MXB2001 ปีที่แล้ว

      I never knew about the mesh until I saw this video. I'd always thought it was completely open. I guess the mesh was a makeshift solution to the inevitable question people asked when they saw the open top. Grenades? Yeah, yeah we'll put a mesh over it. Happy? : )

    • @JL-tm3rc
      @JL-tm3rc ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the gunner can punch it through the mesh pushing it out

    • @sirrathersplendid4825
      @sirrathersplendid4825 ปีที่แล้ว

      The mesh was tensioned, so very unlikely a grenade or molotov bottle would do anything other than bounce off. The trick would be to aim for the gap at the back. (The gap in the 222 mesh was even smaller.)

  • @matscaife9014
    @matscaife9014 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reminds of the Sherman 🤔👍🪘👍

  • @joeperson4792
    @joeperson4792 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's too bad there's not enough history about the 2.8 cms version. Was it a tank destroyer or just a mobile carrier of that squeeze bore gun?

    • @danielhurst8863
      @danielhurst8863 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The 2.8 did not last long in combat, as the taper bore was effective at greatly increasing velocity, but this meant the rounds required tungsten, which was in very short supply and was needed for tooling. Past a certain velocity, steel shells will shatter rather than penetrate. It's why depleted uranium is used today.

  • @AwayWithYouVileBeggar
    @AwayWithYouVileBeggar ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ah yes: The Sqeezy Boy

  • @ncrvako
    @ncrvako ปีที่แล้ว +1

    could such desing reapear to the batttlefield today?

  • @theromanorder
    @theromanorder ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks formilar... at my grandparents i had a small green armored car... it looks very similar to this, i also had a biger metal tank that looks like a dingaro (apologize for my spelling im not physics capable of improving it.

  • @angry_zergling
    @angry_zergling 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:36 Is that a panther with a pz4 turret and gun?

  • @peterfranklin8653
    @peterfranklin8653 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I cant put my finger on why the the narrators voice sounds so weird. It sounds like three accents and a mild speech impediment teaming up to do an impression of a droning teacher.
    Im just gonna say it: "Turr-t"
    try and unhear it.

  • @stevesandford7442
    @stevesandford7442 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Any information on the Panther hull with the Pz4 turret at 10:35?

    • @oddballsok
      @oddballsok ปีที่แล้ว

      i am amazed that they serve the same turret ring diameter and pin/racket shape...

    • @stevesandford7442
      @stevesandford7442 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was going to ask the same question...

  • @elmerelles9542
    @elmerelles9542 ปีที่แล้ว

    Check out 10:36. A panther w a pz IV turret…?

  • @filibandicoot1580
    @filibandicoot1580 ปีที่แล้ว

    It wasn't bad it had its role, how is it different than a up armored humvee ?

  • @madkoala2130
    @madkoala2130 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this Gruber's "little tank" from Allo allo?

    • @CZ350tuner
      @CZ350tuner ปีที่แล้ว

      No, Gruber had a SdKfz.222.

    • @madkoala2130
      @madkoala2130 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CZ350tuner what's the difference?

    • @CanalTremocos
      @CanalTremocos ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@madkoala2130 222 is armed with a 20mm autocannon and a gunner is added to the crew. Otherwise, basically the same.

  • @jackjones9460
    @jackjones9460 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like it would’ve been a Great recon vehicle and great for causing chaos among the enemy. 😊

  • @MaxTSanches
    @MaxTSanches ปีที่แล้ว

    As with many vehicles, it was a good vehicle when it was designed. But, like many other vehicles it was quickly overtaken my the frantic rate of development of other vehicles that happens during war. Just look at the five years from the 1940s Matilda I heavy tank, vs the 1945 IS-2 heavy tank. Infact some vehicles were obsolite before they reached the production line.

  • @JK-br1mu
    @JK-br1mu ปีที่แล้ว

    That would be exciting to hit one of those tin cans with a tank shell from point blank.

  • @oddballsok
    @oddballsok ปีที่แล้ว

    no pictures of 221 in DAK ?? huh ???(tamiya)

  • @derrickstorm6976
    @derrickstorm6976 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Did Hitler try to promote it to the Jedi Council?
    Someone better get this joke...

  • @koenvangeleuken2853
    @koenvangeleuken2853 ปีที่แล้ว

    the wehrmacht judged these vehicles as ""not suited for front use ", after revieuwing the experiences with the vehicles in russia. it was unreliable, very complicated and hard to repair, and the suspension was very fragile. the 4wheel steering was considered useless, because it was dangerous at speed, and far to heavy to steer at low speeds. (no power steering). read the book of Spielberger about german army armoured wheeled vehicles.

  • @metalmadsen
    @metalmadsen ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer Lt. Grübers little tank.

  • @RandomZFella
    @RandomZFella ปีที่แล้ว

    “Sd.KFC.222”
    💀💀💀

  • @Sigmamalerule729
    @Sigmamalerule729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    even todays tanks doesnot match style swag power and terror of Tiger tank

  • @aidangee6407
    @aidangee6407 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like a brdm.

  • @mustangrt8866
    @mustangrt8866 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would have been better with a 20mm autocannon for self defense and radios

    • @michaelschmid9567
      @michaelschmid9567 ปีที่แล้ว

      The version with more armor, 20mm autocannon and radio was called Panzer 2. The version with more armor, radio and same gun was called Panzer 1. Oh, they had tracks as well.

    • @23GreyFox
      @23GreyFox ปีที่แล้ว

      That became the 222, little bigger, 2cm gun, 90hp engine and with radio. It was a excellent vehicle.

  • @secretbaguette
    @secretbaguette ปีที่แล้ว

    Furthermore...

  • @99Racker
    @99Racker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Compromise.

  • @robotnikkkk001
    @robotnikkkk001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    =AND IT'S WAY MUCH BETTER THAN BENTLEY=!!!!!!
    =HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE

  • @tonylam9548
    @tonylam9548 ปีที่แล้ว

    China is an ideal dumping ground for obsolete and unwanted European and American weapons. Such as the P40 that was already obsolete at the start of WW2. The 221 suit China well, because it is better than anything else they can produce and the really lousy quality of the Japanese tanks. German products also enjoyed a reputation in China for precision and good quality, which lingered on to this day. That's why China bought much of the weapons from Germany. Even small arms, You will always feel unarmed if you are carrying a Japanese pistol rather than a Mauser or Walther.

  • @jean-francoislemieux5509
    @jean-francoislemieux5509 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ears really? lol ping ping ping boom!