Glaucon's Challenge | Republic Book 2 Summary (1 of 2)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @kstaw
    @kstaw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    the most just thing one can do is make videos to help get me through my 8am philosophy class

  • @dallasryle7740
    @dallasryle7740 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dr Anadale, as a practicing attorney, this is so reminiscent of the dreaded law school, your presentations are so very clear and spot on, when i compare to the text. " the goodness of being a victor is outweighed by the badness of being a victim" etc. This is justice, straight out of social contract theory, yes, AND the risk/reward analogy so often used in the law in economics approach. Your restatements are wonderful. Thanks again dallas ryle atlanta

  • @eyuphanaltundag7769
    @eyuphanaltundag7769 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Gördüğüm en iyi felsefe anlatıcısı, Türkiye'den sevgiler.

  • @heathen0001
    @heathen0001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very very important video, thank you professor Anadale for putting Glaucon's questions in such an eloquent and clear manner.

  • @julianbeaupre1091
    @julianbeaupre1091 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    this helped a lot. thank you for helping me understand

  • @nancy-jx4nw
    @nancy-jx4nw ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!! Thank you. Your cadence and attention to detail is amazing.

  • @faisala.younus6223
    @faisala.younus6223 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    omg thank you so much for this video. such a simple and laser focused discussion

  • @LanceMaverickLive
    @LanceMaverickLive 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I found this video very helpful, thank you for making it.

  • @anishulislam148
    @anishulislam148 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have a background in science and have recently taken an interest in philosophy and Plato's republic is book I started with and I have to admit more then half of the time I don't know what is going on and also the English is a bit hard to understand . I have to read the same sentence a couple of times to understand it and then I move on to the next page , by the time I am done with this new page I don't remember what I understood in the previous page. I thank you sir for your efforts it's a big help.

    • @neuronneuron3645
      @neuronneuron3645 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can think of the book as multiple people giving their conflicting opinions on what justice is and what the just society would look like
      So don't expect one page to support the next in the same way that in a conversation on justice one speaker doesn't support the next but rather all are tied to the same subject of justice

    • @anishulislam148
      @anishulislam148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neuronneuron3645 Thank you for your comment and you are quit right .

  • @thetaniagvshow
    @thetaniagvshow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Best explanation on youtube thank you, just saved my brain from being confused

  • @jeremygusi9949
    @jeremygusi9949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is very clear and helpful, thank you!

  • @mahnoorehsan6325
    @mahnoorehsan6325 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very great and informative video, i understood all the topics well !

  • @ahmedj1254
    @ahmedj1254 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Professor!

  • @Platinho
    @Platinho 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video, great channel

  • @theannoyingone903
    @theannoyingone903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This helped my essay. I hope you get invited here in Canada

  • @EDTJ1005
    @EDTJ1005 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was sooo helpful thanks 🐐🐐

  • @network_noob
    @network_noob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are a great teacher! thanks for this!

  • @timothydowns9342
    @timothydowns9342 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    to complete an ardous goal, there must be a carrot at the end of the stick and something pleasurable about the process in order to maintain focus. a strong why--> a strong will + enjoyment of the self in the betterment process = consistent incremental progress

  • @shekum.sheriff1545
    @shekum.sheriff1545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos analyzing book 2 of the Republic has been helpful. I still think you should throw more light on the example of Mother Teresa and Hitler.

  • @Purple_queen7
    @Purple_queen7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The besttttt explanation everrrrrr😭💗
    Love from India 🤍

  • @julsonetienne3233
    @julsonetienne3233 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had to click on the subscribe button. Hat down! Thank you sir.

  • @galebusiness1941
    @galebusiness1941 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for your sharing

  • @hervejean-baptiste2083
    @hervejean-baptiste2083 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much

  • @annjemah6064
    @annjemah6064 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IM literally crying!!! I love POL Sci, but this book is such a torture!!! The ideas of the book are interesting, but the wording is killing me

  • @shifanathvs4915
    @shifanathvs4915 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome class Sir.. it helped me alot.. thankyou😊

  • @dianarogava3273
    @dianarogava3273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the Natural origin of Justice did you mean 358 e-359c?
    I am self studying philosophy as a high school student and could not find that section (258e) in the book

    • @ChristopherAnadale
      @ChristopherAnadale  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're right, the card on the screen is mistaken. It's 358, not 258. Thanks for pointing that out!

    • @dianarogava3273
      @dianarogava3273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Christopher Anadale thank you ❤️

    • @mohib3661
      @mohib3661 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi! Non-philosophy student here, just wondering what ou mean by 358e-359c? I'm not familiar with the nomenclature. Thanks in advance!

    • @ChristopherAnadale
      @ChristopherAnadale  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mohib3661 They are standard citation numbers, that work across all editions/translations of Plato. I explain it more here: th-cam.com/video/XHXt80hPH7M/w-d-xo.html

    • @mohib3661
      @mohib3661 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ChristopherAnadale thank you :)

  • @oscarg2692
    @oscarg2692 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't remember the details but I remember reading somewhere that Mother Terese actually did some pretty fucked things.

  • @andysovann
    @andysovann 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's your personal criticism of Glaucon's points and ideas? What would the interpretation be? Do you agree with his idea? Why or why not?

    • @Tony-bu3ln
      @Tony-bu3ln 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Andy S dude WTF. That is literally an exam question.

    • @marwanazami264
      @marwanazami264 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Tony-bu3ln LMAO