Laura Ashley - Ann Iverson: from Bloom to Doom

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3

  • @laurawalker6431
    @laurawalker6431 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ann Iverson was about customer and selling cheap things, but Laura Ashley needed to be marketed as a brand like Chennel or LV, or a fararri etc etc! If they did that it would still survive today! It was marketed by the wrong hands. We still love the classic floral dresses and they should have stuck to what they do best, classics, like furniture and floral prints. And not change according to market manipulation! LV don’t do that, they stuck to what they do best, like any good brand! They are not a department store and shouldn’t have tried to be one! So sad really. We miss it! We miss seeing it on our high streets around the world. They were so good with furniture. They should never have gone public so quickly so badly done!

  • @sararichardson737
    @sararichardson737 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Shop floors over stuffed. Clothes packed in like sardines. Less is more.

  • @wzrdreams
    @wzrdreams 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ugh. I hate hearing her get bogged down in why the back ground is burry. Like the stylist has time to explain camera focal length when the question was about signing off on content.