I love the fact that the cammer simply explained that his indicated speed was 30 and the coppers response was don't call me a liar. Maybe someone needs to teach him what being called a liar actually means coz he obviously doesn't have a clue
happens all the time. Once over took a cop doing 30 in a 40 zone. He followed me all the way to my destination, did a full car search, background check, breathalizer, the full works on it because I told him "You were doing 10 under on a dual carriageway. Thats wreckless driving. YOU'RE at fault." For about the next month, i seemed to be pulled over every few days for a "Routine random check." If this ever happens to someone, demand their badge numbers and the reason for them stopping you. THen report them for harrassment by the fourth time.
I'm a police officer. The behaviour of that officer was completely shocking and uncalled for and I hope the cammer put a complaint in because he needs a bollocking for that incident. Very very embarassing conduct. My colleagues need to remember that everyone's contact with Police can shape how they view us. This could have been the cammer's first ever real contact with Police and unfortunately it was needlessly negative, and now he may have a more negative perception of Police as a whole. What a shame.
I think the perception isn't aided by the behind-closed-doors nature of said bollockings. Were there a weekly section on local news saying "and this week, Bobby Plod badge number 90210 incorrectly admonished a driver for speeding due to not knowing how corners work, he was suspended for one week without pay", maybe showing bodycam footage or something, the general public would see "oh hey they actually ARE held to some sort of standard!" As it is now I bet most people, the cammer included, wouldn't even bother complaining about it 'cause there's no point.
And yet this is now the all too common experience most of us have with interacting with police. I've met good ones, but none in the last twenty years. The hiring policy changed. I think these days, courteous, conscientious and principled officers are weeded out at the application stage, in favour of confident, assertive order followers with specific I.Q. ranges. If we had police with principles, they wouldn't obey unlawful edicts from their bosses, like issuing FPN's or arresting street preachers, profiled stop and search , or threatening people with jail for politically incorrect speech. They say a few bad apples spoils the lot, and that's doubly true in the force. If those bad apples are never removed, and we all know that police do NOT grass on their own, then that leaves 'good' officers who are prepared to work with criminals every day. Until I see the scum dealt with, then to me, the rest of you are nothing more than their accomplices, turning a blind eye to the people work with you being villains. I'm sure many police feel like you do, but I've yet to see one upset enough to act. Bad police are hardly ever reported, and when they are, internal investigations invairiably find no wrongdoing. A few of you being above the law makes you ALL rightly hated and mistrusted, because you let them be there. What that officer did was tame, but had the driver disputed his false accusation he'd have been stopped and the police would have gone fishing on him, just to inconvenience him, intimidate him, and exert his power. He's have been I.D'd as a suspected criminal, his vehicle checked with a microscope, and had he continued to insist he was within the speed limit, that officer would have charged him with a crime we all saw didn't happen. No matter who he showed the footage to it would go all the way to court at our public expense, and when shown to be in the right, that officer would not be in court to defend his accusation and no action would be taken against them for abusing their position of authority to intimidate innocent members of the public. So, if police are upset about the lack of respect from the public, maybe, like in this clip, the public are 100% right about exactly how much respect is due. You all wear the same uniform, and you all close ranks around law breakers and psychopaths in your midst, even though you all see what goes on, and you all have the power to arrest these scars on your reputation, so you all deserve the same level of respect. Personally I want the minimum interaction with any of you, even in an emergency. I'd rather deal with it myself, and trust random members of the public than see any of YOUR gang get involved, and it will take one HELL of a police shakeup and a LOT of sackings and at least SOME prosecutions of bad police to change my mind.
@@Asdayasman Sadly my family has had dealings with the Police which shows the standards. If you do go to court, you can't ask for the footage (body or dash), and they'll provide it after proceedings. The footage they do use in court can be edited to their favour, and is fine as its not your evidence. (video it yourself). A complaint against the Police will only go further if the senior officer allows it to go further. Basically a veto. Sadly I'm under South Yorkshire polices 'care'. Their reputation is in the cats litter tray as far as I'm concerned. Hillsborough & Rotherham Taxis come to mind. Dealt with them a few times, otherwise OK, but on a community/city level, its non existence presence, Wild West style policing. I live in Darnall Sheffield, which has the HQ only a few miles away, but I hear far more ambulances than police
@@DashCamSheffield "Edited to their favour" makes sense though - no man should be forced to testify against himself. If they omit evidence of them doing wrong, that's not surprising, everyone should be expected to do that, as the burden of proof is on the accuser. I'm assuming by "edited" you mean "cut" of course - I don't imagine anyone is deepfaking police bodycam footage to CYA. I hear Rotherham has some good history with lawkeeping. You know, with those kids 'n' that. Personally I'd move.
the officer doesn't understand the inside of the corner travels a shorter distance than the outside. should really have some basic logic tests before we hand people so much power
In which case if two vehicles are travelling side by side at the same speed the one on the inside would move ahead of the one on the outside. For the one on the outside it would have to go faster than the one on the inside just to keep up and faster still to overtake. Not that it matters. The driver did hit 32 for a second or two so the copper is right even if he is a petty prick looking for a conflict.
My guess is a young lad who hasn't had enough negative feedback from passengers yet. Amazing how many non incidents happen when you pull back on the speed
I don't think doing ~50 on the 2nd clip is beyond the pale, but that last incident he was going miles too fast for that residential street. How was he planning to stop at the give way?
The officer's arrogance through ignorance has actually really annoyed me. Any simple explanation is one step closer to getting arrested, when you've done nothing wrong. The cammer was actually quite calm which i suppose is good.
LOL ! Its never a good idea to trigger a cops ego. " Don't call me a liar" Well done driver for defusing that one !! I mean the classic responce would be "not calling you a liar but I will call you a #####". Its very telling that the driver had to defuse this so basicly doing the cops job. IDK I think I saw him hit 32mph at one point I did not see him speed.
All good points, but I think it's asking for trouble passing them. Whenever police are doing slightly under it always feels like a trap to me, unless it's on the motorway where they often sit at 55-65.
Traffic cop doesn't even understand the concept of two cars going round a bend at the same speed and the inner car having less distance to travel. Embarrssing.
8:25 This may be a mild incident, but it's a perfect example of the bullying, self righteous attitude displayed by a significant number of police we see these days. Crime is rife, Home office announces a clamp down and this is the result. No impact on the real issues people experience, but police trying to put the fear of god into people just going about their merry way so it appears as if they are strict and firm, when really they are just bullies. I know it's not all police. There are still many officers who are caring and honest. and I salute those people, but I fear they are dwindling. Too many of them these days will simply mindlessly follow orders, even if those orders overreach their powers and infringe rights, which is a VERY dangerous situation.
Maybe the cammer should consider making an official complaint about the Officer’s attitude. Reading other comments on the video, I can see a very negative undertone regarding the police. I agree I think the Officer was out of order with his comments and might have been trying to provoke a situation, which could have led to a booking. Fortunately, the dash cam is without bias and although the Police like dash cam footage of incidents, they need to remember these devices can record their actions as well.
Like the cyclist cycling down a two lane road but with parked cars along his side. A police van clearly close passed, and after he complained, stopped to try and intimidate him, claiming he was riding in the middle of the road and it wasn't a close pass.
Yes Ashley, the opening crash got my attention alright. It got my attention at the time as well. Other driver said it was my fault. I didn't tell him at the time that I had a dashcam, I just let him tell his mother it was another driver responsible for crashing into her car, and tell her insurance company the same. Until they saw the video and accepted 100% blame immediately
this is one of those cases where the dashcam sees more than the driver. Sees the car earlier and sees it unobstructed. It's nose was on the windshield, and mine wasn't. Well not until after the collision.
The reason for the bad view at the junction is the train line that passes underneath at an angle, and that structure to the right is part of the railway. But also there is a lampost on the other side of the junction. I hit that when my face was nestled in an airbag and it was wobbling over the trainline. Arrives the council in superfast time.
Think any adjudicator worth their salt would have found the other driver at fault from photos but was good to have the dash cam. Unfortunately there will always be people who will try to weasel out of fault, no matter the circumstances.
The traffic officer on the second last clip was rude. There was no need for that at all. If he was going to say something, he should have pulled him over, or just let it go. Rude words of advice and the pretentious attitude gives them a bad name, and yes they may have been dealing with something earlier that was stressful, but you don't take it out on the next person you deal with.
Just said the same thing further up. Bolshy coppers are a problem to all and sundry. Not all are like it by any means, but those who are are utter clegg nuts.
"Don't call me a liar", seems like he said it more out of muscle memory. If people are calling you a liar in so many situations that you say it as a reflex, you need to ask why are they doing that.
..does that officer not understand that the inside lane on a corner is shorter, and as such you'll travel through the corner quicker than those in the outside lane while going at the same speed?
With the radius of that bend it would have been a miniscule difference. To get 1mph diff on 30 mph you would need 3.33% difference in turn radius. Estimating from how long it took him to get from the rear corner of the police car to the front corner he was going 2 to 3 mph faster. And he was getting 32 from the gps for a couple of seconds, although that is also not an accurate way of telling exact speed.
@@BennyHarveyBigMan However, passing under a bridge can interrupt the GPS signal and cause a spike in the displayed speed when it regains it. Natural fluctuation in GPS coordinates has had my dashcam show 1 mph when the car has been parked.
@@Kris_M If it's a 3 metre wide lane, then that means a 90 metre (180 diameter) curve will do the trick. That's a shallow curve by UK standards. It would equate to a roundabout with a circumference of over half a kilometre. So, no, it is not a miniscule difference, and I would judge that curve to be on a radius of significantly less than 90 metres.
@@Kris_M should be looking at distance not speed. circumference is measured by pi*d. Lanes are usually 2.5-4m wide. The tighter the curve the more exacerbated the difference will be. on a 100m diameter curve, a single lane of difference will equate to 6% or more difference in diameter. This curve looks close to 50-60m diameter, which means the difference is closer to 10-12%
I have only once been stopped by the police, about thirty years ago when I lived in Manchester. It was an unmarked car that raced up behind me, tailgated, and did all it could to goad me into speeding. I slowed down to let them pass (I thought it was some dickhead), then the blues went on. I stopped immediately, and one of the officers got out to berate me, claiming I had been speeding. I had not, and of course there was no arrest, no charge, because there was no evidence. He was just angry because I hadn't fallen into his trap. I'm generally pro-police but sometimes they really don't help themselves with the law-abiding public.
I had similar driving through Wigan once. I passed a police car that was stuck behind some slow traffic. He shot out and raced up behind me. He put his window down at the next lights and went on a rant about how I was speeding and I was I going to calm it down. He was completely hysterical. I wasn’t speeding, I know the road well and there’s a speed camera on it. I would be stupid to race past that. That idiot has shaped my opinion of the police and this was years ago now.
Also car speedometers are set to show you are going faster than you actually are. By law they must show between 100% and 110% of the actual speed so are typically set at 105% to give some degree of tolerance for tyre wear etc. On the other hand we don't know the accuracy of the GPS speed on the dashcam. There are many factors that can affect that.
@@ditch3827 The GPS was likely affected by passing under the bridge. Briefly cutting the signal will result in a jump in displayed speed when it's regained, it momentarily showing a value higher that the car is actually travelling at. My dashcam has briefly shown over 300 mph in the past as an extreme example of this. I have a 1.6 diesel Focus, so the garage employee driving it at the time didn't actually manage to go that fast.
8:00 same reason long distance track runners/cyclists go around the inside of the track and not the outside. And why starting positions are staggered for shorter distances.
The police clip is disappointing to me. The police don't have the best reputation nowadays, and incidents like this don't help to improve it. Doing 32 in a 30 limit is technically illegal, but giving drivers grief about such small infringements really just serves to annoy (and criminalise, if a ticket is issued) people who are essentially law abiding. That gives a bad impression and that bad impression can be long lasting because negative experiences tend to stick in the memory. In the long run, this sort of police behaviour makes their job harder, because the public becomes steadily less cooperative.
Completely correct, I have hated them for so much of my life because they are generally the lowest forms of life on the planet with a high viz and a bit of power. It took me having a car accident about 6 months ago and one of my first decent interactions with one to realise they arent all pricks.
8:47 "don't call me a liar". A lot of people infer that they are being called a liar under this type of situation. This is not the case it is being alleged that you are mistaken in your assertion that I am incorrect.
@@ditch3827 Hi Ditch, good to see you, mate. Hope you're well. I agree. Hence my use of the qualifier "effectively". ...But I will engage "pedant mode" (just cos I can! 😁): The copper absolutely didn't ask if the cammer was calling him a liar. He told the cammer not to call him a liar (i.e. "Don't call me a liar"). Which isn't the same thing at all. 😛 I do wonder how things would have panned out if the cammer had said it to the copper first though. I seriously doubt that the copper would have taken it with the same grace as the cammer.
2:10 Good job that cyclist for looking after yourself instead of riding full speed into danger. You slowed down a lot when the car turned into the cycle track and stopped completely when they started coming towards you as who knows what they were about to next. Very good.
I'm not the cyclist in the video, but I'd have done the exact same. When on a bike, you learn pretty quickly to ride as defensively as possible. A few seconds off your journey is better than a few days in hospital.
Regarding the police clip, it's not as if the cammer was driving like they were at Silverstone. Public opinion and trust are really necessary for the police to do their jobs. Incidents like that only add fuel to the public distrust bonfire. It takes 100 incidents of good policing to overcome 1 incident of bad stuff like this.
Glad I scrolled down a bit, cos I was just about to leave this same comment! It's missing from the left-hand side sign, for some reason, but yeah it's there! Easily missed though so I can understand the driver or passenger (whoever was speaking) being surprised by the low aircraft.
I had similar once. Passed a copper in a 40 doing 40 he pulled me over for a chat. Funny part was we both set off and both turned in to the same road as the police station was one end I lived the other.
Tell me about it, you calmly explain their ignorance and they red mist. Then "You're" the one having a go 🤷. I'd have just been like, "I'll send my dashcam footage in buddy it has my speed on there".
It has to be said that the footage of the police officer abusing his position sounded very much like it had been submitted by a white guy - I thought that this sort of stuff was all to do with race or misogyny and nothing to do with generally being unsuitable to hold such an office, period???? Did the cammer then go and break into the local supermarket and ransack it?
@@cestparti7577 What doesn't trigger a cops ego these days, you can't say anything but "sorry sir" and "yes sir". In a situation that wasn't your fault it's essentially gagging you for no reason. Yeah the video annoyed me but to be honest i do try to defuse, so i wouldn't be risky at all.
Poorly judged by the officer but it really shouldn't warrant a minimum of 1 month unpaid leave. Police should be held to account for abuse of power, but this wasn't an abuse, just arrogance and misreading the situation. Ideally they should be confronted about their attitude here, but saying this should result in that kind of punishment is childish
In the police clip, if the dashcam is showing around 28-30mph then the speedometer is probably showing 31-33 (although it seems to vary slightly by manufacturer), which is probably not worth giving someone a warning over. 16 seems a bit too fast but I think a sign showing there's a junction just after the hill would be helpful. That's a dangerous place to emerge from since it's behind the hill and just after the change in speed limit. 17 seems fine in terms of speed, the driver successfully avoided that terrible overtake.
As I understand it, the offence is simply to be travelling above a certain speed, rather than to believe or know you are doing so. Unlike many things in law, your "intent" is not taken into account.
@@GeorgeFoot Yes that is true. Although there's usually meant to be a tolerance buffer above the speed limit, probably to avoid disagreements over speedo vs gps vs radar differences. Most places seem to go for +10% + 2mph.
Clip 21 with the policeman - I would send the clip in including my speed to the police department. It would hopefully make them think a bit better next time. Absolute power trip
@@cargy930 of course not. it's not a certified calibrated speedometer. like the one in the police car that was cruising at 30 MPH, while the camera car caught up with him, even before he went for the inside line on the corner, where despite his claims otherwise, his indicated speed hit 32 MPH.
@@kenbrown2808 You said _"you might want to edit out the part where the indicated speed exceeded 30"_ The copper's speedo isn't *in* the clip. So what exactly are you suggesting needs to be edited out for the OP's suggested complaint to the Police? Or are you still just assuming the GPS is accurate *despite the twisting road?*
@@cargy930 the part where the speed readout ashley circled read 32 MPH. are you still assuming the drivers claim that his indicated speed was below 30 MPH is not belied by showing an indicated speed above 30 MPH? and again, the fact that he caught up with the police officer BEFORE he went for the racing line while the officer was maintaining 30 MPH by his CALIBRATED speedomoeter and the GPS showed a lower speed indicates either the cammer's speedomoeter was reading low, or it did indicate a speed over 30 MPH. bottom line is: arguing with a cop who gives a verbal warning in passing is almost as stupid as deciding to overtake a cop.
The Police officer didn't have a train set or Scalextric track as a kid, he is just upset at the missed learning opportunity and is taking it out on people in their day-to-day life.
@@123MondayTuesday At one point it was actually calibrated. Nowadays though I doubt it. Various police documentaries show them flying down a motorway at 160 mph (indicated) in factory cars limited to 155 mph by German legislation (so accurately 155 mph). It becomes apparent that this factory limiter isn't removed from police cars when they try to chase down a fleeing BMW or similar. Once they hit their 155 mph limiter, and the police following the same, the police don't gain even slightly on them, but their speedometer still shows 160 mph, just like the civilian cars will. When this officer first joined, they probably were calibrated, just like how the police probably had more powerful engines in the 'cooking model's' body. The last of those was the last Vectra. The police had some estates with the VXR engine, but without the VXR bodywork. The likes of which have not been around for over a decade now.
Red car driver displaying the textbook behaviour of driving around and not being prepared for anything other than an absolutely clear road ahead. In almost all of their clips.
For what it's worth it might be a good idea to complain to the force about that officer's conduct as he seems the type who is well too eager to abuse his power. A part of life which was hard to prove before the wide adoption of dash cams.
The cop was out on an ego trip but the cammer made himself an easy target by actually speeding over 30 for a bit there. When ever a cop is around, I always make sure to drive extra slow so that way they don't give you a ticket for doing 1 over the limit for a split second. Don't give them any excuses to pull you over. If they're in front of you, keep your distance and make sure you're slow enough so they pull away. If others want to blast past you, let them and let them become someone else's problem. Personal blind spots are a big issue when people get behind the wheel. You'll do well to not get in their way. They'll only blame you for their mistakes.
@@kenbrown2808 Doesn't matter whether it's a marked police car or just regular traffic. He was doing 30 mph, only reason he was able to overtake was because he was on the inside of the turn, no excuse from the officer to speak to him in that manner, it just shows even police officers can't handle being overtaken, just like morons in merge in turn situations.
That ANPR camera flashing away in the police car was interesting, I guess it was IR flashes and only visible in the dashcam as it's probably got a weak IR filter to allow better night vision... maybe.
I think all video cameras can pick up infra red light - you can try it with your TV remote if you have a camera - I haven't tried it with a phone, bit it should work
"Usually you'll find a sign warning you of this prior to it happening"... @2:46 showing the sign, and then on the right hand side of the screen the exact sign is below the 40mph sign.
I lived in Australia many years ago and every year without fail was attacked by breeding and nesting magpies whilst walking down the shops. They attack anything and everything. You either had to walk down with an umbrella, a long stick which was held up so it was taller than you or a hat with a set of eyes sewn into the back of it because they would usually attack from rear and if they saw the eyes they would hopefully be scared off. Oh and definately keep an eye out for drop bears 🐻 Speaking of dogs though, we did have one in our suburb that loved chasing cars and attempting to bite your tyres as you were moving! 🤣😂🤣
What a weird road layout! 7:05 Technically whilst this piece of tarmac may be there with a give way etc, no one should ever actually drive down it. This set of traffic lights only seems to have a green filter arrow pointing left and Rule 177 says you have to go in the direction of the arrow.
Magpies are awesome. My cat brought one in last summer - still alive thankfully. Managed to catch the little fellow and set him free in the garden, where he promptly flew to the top of a 4ft fence post within easy pouncing distance, and started verbally abusing the cat, before spending the next hour taunting her around the garden, staying just out of reach 😂
When I was in foster care I lived close to a military air base (in Belgium) and the road passing next to it had traffic lights which switched on when a plane was about to land or take off
@5:16 I have a new rule I'm starting to teach my students: Never pass the row of cars beside you at more than 20 mph (or 30 km/h) faster than their speed.
I've heard the following suggestion for motorbike filtering (lane splitting) in the UK. But the way I commuted on a dual carriageway, was just to rejoin the queue if it reached 20 mph. Hand covering the brake lever too. If a gap appeared, I expected someone to move across suddenly. "The 20:20 rule - filtering safely There is a school of thought that says filtering is safe as long as the traffic you are overtaking is travelling at no more than 20mph and you are overtaking them at no more than an additional 20mph. This rule will cap filtering speeds at 40mph and it is thought that the police will not intervene with anyone filtering at that speed. Again, however, it is worth stressing that this is a school of thought rather than a hard and fast rule. If a police officer determines that you are filtering unsafely, carelessly or too quickly, you could still be stopped, even if you haven’t broached the 40mph limit."
What are the chances that the HGV driver beckoned them to cross? Since watching this channel for the past year I've stopped all flashing of lights / waving on / encouraging others to move. I had a habit of just looking forward and signalling for them to go, without looking for dangers behind.
Police officer clearly has some ego issues! Granted, the overtaker was going over the speed limit and wasn't the smartest to go over the limit next to a police car, but it was by 2-3mph at most. The officer didn't need to honk the horn and definitely didn't need to have a go. Someone's got too much time on their hands!
Just in case you didn't realise, at 2:45 when you point out that sometimes there is a warning sign for low aircraft, there is actually one on the right hand side of the road below the "Lower Uphum" sign. It does seem quite small and is on the "wrong" side of the road though. Also, to add, there are some places (One of the roads near RAF Brize Norton comes to mind) where the sign is coupled with the flashing lights you get at level crossings, for larger aircraft. I happened to have to wait for one (a Globemaster iirc) to land once!
I used to commute past the end of a runway with those warning lights (33 years of it). One day they did not come on and a military aircraft passed over me with about 5m clearance, that's a surprise when it happens.
hi training glider pilot here, 2:50 looks like there was a sign in the clip on the left. sometimes on small airstrips it is necessary to use all the runway as pilots must ensure they have enough time to perform a go around
It's peasant mentality, something like we all must queue an equal amount of time, and I got here first bs. Just view them with the pity and contempt they deserve.
It's always just best solved by yielding to any helmets that think they're entitled to go first. Denying them their petty ego boost is simply not worth the hassle in dealing with them or potentially causing an incident.
@@artemkatelnytskyi Plenty of signs saying MERGE IN TURN or USE BOTH LANES in recent months, at least in my area. Idiots still don't, and some actively try to block others from using all the space.
Merge In Turn - nothing could be easier. One from the left, one from the right - and repeat. Amazing how many drivers cannot grasp this simple concept.
I first took driving lessons in 1997. For a variety of reasons, I didn't pass a test until 2010. I only heard the term 'merge in turn' last year watching Ashley's videos. None of the instructors I drove with used the term, my copy of the Highway Code doesn't include use of the term. To drivers of my age then, it's just pushing in. I don't think it's not being able to grasp a concept, it's that no-one told us about the concept to start with.
Generalisations are the foundation of science, but can also serve the survival instinct. In my general driving observations, women don't look, young men tailgate, drivers of German cars don't indicate, and lycra cyclists look for trouble.
The conversation seemed to suggest 30 mph was the limit. The brief display of 32 mph needs to be taken with a pinch of salt though as they were passing under a bridge at the time. GPS speed displays like those used by dashcams can indicate a momentarily higher speed than is actually being driven at if the signal is interrupted by anything, like a large structure of concrete and steel. They could have been at a consistent 28 mph through there but the GPS signal dropping out caused it to calculate the speed from 2 coordinates further apart than they actually were for the same time elapsed.
Nice to see quite a few clips from around my area. Especially that plane clip, might have to journey down that road more often to see that spectacular!
I saw this video two days ago and the incident with the police has really played on my mind. The cammer appeared to remain calm when talking but the police person spoke in an intimidating manner, which bordered on aggressive. I don’t know how I would have reacted to this kind of intimidation, but top marks to the cammer, and zero marks to the police.
Consider this: Have they've gone over the speed limit yet claim their speedo is reporting below the real speed? So yes, by inference they've accused the officer of lying? They're saying I was doing 30 when I overtook you, not more. But they actually say I was doing 27 because my speedo showed 30? So to overtake the cop car by inference the cop car was doing around 24 when they overtook? The officer claimed to be doing 30 and they've said, basically, no it was 24? They didn't say my speedo showed 33 but is actually 30, why not?
As an Australian I can say I could see a thousand spiders and a million snakes but nothing's more scary then a Magpie during breeding season, they'll go at you none stop until you're 5km away from their nest
Let’s hope the cop watches this. Let’s hope that he listens to himself accuse the driver of something that he didn’t say. The driver didn’t call him a liar or infer it either. He was providing his own explanation which he is entitled. You wouldn’t want this copper to nick you. He’d be busy making up the evidence.
the viewer with the red bonnet is an accident waiting to happen, with very unpredictable rates of speed change he makes it a nightmare for other drivers to know what he is doing.
That arrogant officer reminded me of a time I was pulled over by police in Ilfracombe after I overtook a car on a duel carriageway in a 60 zone. One of the police said "It stands to reason you must have been speeding back in the 30 zone to have caught then(the other driver) up. So in their head, that is the only possibility. What actually happened was I was driving out of the town and the other driver pulled out of a side road ahead of me, went up to (and possibly over) 30, then slowed to 20 because they lit up one of those 30mph warning signs. Meanwhile, me in my car, happily cruising with my cruise control on at 29, like I always do (probably too much really) caught the other driver up. Then when they failed to accelerate once we reached the 60 zone, I used the outside lane of the dual carriageway to overtake them. Given that the police said they suspected me for drink driving, I think they had already determined they were going to suspect someone of it that evening, and they chose me, even though once I had pulled over they could see all my fishing tackle in my car, as I had just been sea fishing. One thing the officer didn't consider when he made the assumption, is that the road was not a straight one and they were obviously not around to see us in the 30 zone. There are no roads to turn off to for several hundred yards, after that 30mph LED warning sign, which means, if I was going over 30mph when they weren't around to see me, they must have been doing over 30mph themselves to have caught us up, when we wouldn't have been in view to them due to the bends.
20 years ago the gamekeepers wife on the estate got off the bus and ran across the front of the bus and into the road without looking. A guy overtook the bus without slowing down and threw her up the road. Result? She was three months in a hospital bed and eighteen months of physio to learn to walk again. Now I always overtake large stationary vehicles with utmost caution, keeping as far from their side as I can, trying to see underneath for feet or shadows, and am ready to put the anchors on if someone walks out without looking. More and more I think we need to ask ourselves 'what if?' and drive accordingly. And we could actually see those guys setting off just before the cammer passed the back of the lorry. Nice save though, but a bit of forethought might have saved his pants from being soiled......
2:30 I think low-flying light aircraft must be a common sight at this location. The road sign says Lower Upham and a quick search reveals there's a tiny little airfield on the right hand side of the road, as you approach the town on the B2177. On Google Maps, you can see that the runway is really close to the road! Definitely a good place to put up the aircraft warning sign Ashley shows.
I zoned in on that one and it's a road I've used over the last 40 plus years as it's Not too far from where i live and close to marwell zoo. I had no idea there was an airfield there.
All he had to say was, "mind your speed mate, my calibrated speedometer has me doing bang-on 30. Have a good day." Or just let it go -- in the grand scheme of things it was nothing. Meanwhile, there's hundreds of clips uploaded to TH-cam of drivers dangerously jumping red lights or doing other completely insane nonsense that doesn't get prosecuted.
@@defragsbin Exactly, and at most he nudged 32 for a second, certainly not enough for the copper to even notice, probably didn't even hit 32 due to inaccuracy of GPS. Just a copper who got hurt by being overtaken, a common occurrence of some moronic road users.
The microlight aircraft was landing at Solent Flight's grass air strip near Southampton. It is very narrow but also quite short so the pilot would want to land as close to the beginning of the strip as possible. I estimate he crossed the road at about 20 feet, which seems entirely reasonable. It's unlikely the local authority would put up 'low flying' warning plates on the road for such a strip.
and I wouldn't have overtaken him to begin with. and if I had been so stupid as to decide to overtake, my response to being called out would be, "sorry, officer, my speedo must be reading low." the expression one of my local officers taught me for that scenario is "he talked himself into a ticket"
8:52 The cop *is* a liar, and I'd happily call him it to his face. The cop's wrong about his speedometer, it's not "calibrated". It's the same as all other cars: about 10% inaccurate. But like so many cops, he's knows nothing.
So why bother provoking him? The police car was travelling close to the limit, the cammer obviously wasn't prepared to overtake him, so he sat in the blind spot like a berk achieving nothing except annoying the copper..
@@davidjones332 Provoking the copper in to slowing down? Apart from a couple of jumps above 30 on an imperfect measure like speed cam GPS the guy broke no laws. Then when the guy was showing sub 30 on the GPS, the cop was still falling behind. So the Cop exaggerated the issue just to have a little "i am" moment. People like you are why the cops will just pressure the average person because you just cede to the smallest presence. They need to learn they are here to serve us, not have a little rant for a micro aggression.
Police vehicle speedometers are actually calibrated. It is probably all software tweaks now with digital cockpits, but for the dials components in the cluster were swapped and tuned/measured to be within a much tighter tolerance.
2:59 But did the cammer spot the approaching danger? Didn’t seem to react until after the event. Definitely a learning point for me to look at the approaching traffic and ask yourself “are they stopping?” 99.9% of the time it will be yes, but you’re ready for that one time.
7:22. If I am the blue Merc and the cammer asked for my insurance details because I made him kerb his wheel. Would I be in my right to refuse to give them to him Ash?
Given that vehicle damage took place involving a third party, you would technically be required to provide details. Failure to do so could involve the Police and a S172 request to the registered keeper.
I find in general a portion of the British public drive and even live their lives with a "me first" selfish self-entitled attitude. I have come to the realisation that I too was falling into this habit of becoming combative to retain my place and space and found it was actually affecting my mental state with heightened anxiety and stress overall. Whilst battling the stresses of daily life with everything in the news, work and environment, an easy outlet can be found on the the roads where someone else is at fault when invading on 'your right'. I have changed my attitude and now drive with much more clarity, patience and focus. I give myself adequate room for error and if someone else wants to barge ahead so be it. I would rather have them in front than behind. I feel calm driving now than in the past and feel proud and satisfied after journeys in the car. It has also made me appreciate the privilege of driving again. People, please rid yourselves of your inconsiderate attitudes and be considerate of others, no matter who they are. We all have different abilities and everyone can make mistakes. The lack of proper planning and maintenance of the roads is enough to contend with without the addition of your entitlement. FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS
You're actually allowed to if the light turns red while you're on it! Still, the cammer possibly should have held back, but I'm not sure the numpty on the wrong side would get the idea then!
At 2.46 ( plane landing), I love that the name of the village is 'Lower Upham' 🤣. Like you said Ash, they come in quite low at Woodvale, but not that low !!!!👍
That is one of the lowest I have seen. I used to go past a small airfield daily that did sight seeing flights. When the wind was in the right direction I tried to time my journey to coincide with a landing 👍 Something graceful about aerodynamics in action
The A490 at Welshpool airport can be like that (great butties in the airport cafe, btw). There's a place near me called Came Down. No airport though, that would be the icing on the cake.
@@smilerbob they don't come in lower but the planes are a lot bigger coming in low over the A38 at Bristol Airport. Also some Heathrow landings when the wind is easterly(?) over the M25 can be pretty low.
@@FFVoyager indeed. There was a road near Gatwick that was good for watching the planes come in until the police come along and ask you to “move along”. Great for watching the A380 land as well as the edge of the runway was a short distance over the fence
7:33, clip starting now:- Either traffic or firearms. If traffic, likely to have a calibrated device on board, but that may not be in main view of the driver. Possible mere differential between two speedos. Personally, were I the cop, I’d have let a slight difference slide, even IF looking at the calibrated device.
I watched some of the 'Drive like a driving instructor.' videos. So now, not only do I drive as if Ashley's in the passenger seat, I have a police car behind me, too. It seems I'm going to have to put one in front, as well. Thank goodness for brown trousers.
clip at 5:20 I've had a similar thing except I was on a motorbike and they were on a bicycle, we both came off but luckily no harm done except for a broken gear selector
5:20 Ah yes, they were wearing the hi-viz invulnerability clothing, so were therefore completely safe. Similar thing: the other day I saw a DPD van whizzing round residential streets far too fast, BUT he had his flashing hazard lights on the whole time. As if that made it safe. These things are just psychological crutches for the weak-minded.
That is a psychological effect called Risk Compensation and affects EVERYONE who thinks what they are doing/wearing/using makes them 'safer'. It's why the moronic calling for 'headlights' in daylight for vehicles and helmet wearing for cyclists is quite probably a disbenefit.
@@FFVoyager I hear what you're saying and mostly agree, but I'd take cycle helmets off your list; A) They do have some practical protective function and B) Making them compulsory would at least provide some (limited) ammunition in getting idiots like those at 3:34 off the road.
With regards to the police clip #21), the cammer was on the very limit of 30mph and unclear if the jump to 32mph was due to incorrect GPS lock on the camera or a genuine 32mph. I suspect the downhill gradient temporarily increased the speed slightly. Either way, could easily be used against the cammer…in my opinion One thing I saw often on the motorway in the past was a police vehicle doing 60mph in lane one and a massive queue of cars doing 60-62mph in lane 2 scared of overtaking. Don’t see it so much these days
The inside lane of a bend will overtake a vehicle on the outside lane of the curve if they're travelling at the same speed. This is school sports level of understanding which the copper should know about. That's why the overtake only happened on the right hand bends and the relative speed dropped off on the left hand bends. No-one's saying the copper was lying, that was an inappropriate response, but I do believe he was mistaken. That notwithstanding, I've met enough bolshy coppers not to bother overtaking them unless they're obviously driving well below the limit. It's always their word against yourn.
Im not 100% sure, but i recall that speedometers in cars are required to be calibrated such that they can never show a speed slower than what the car is actually doing (as speedometers are never 100% accurate)
I wonder how evidentially sound a dash cam's coordinates, let alone speed calculation, are in court, especially around flyovers interfering with line of sight and changes in elevation affecting overall positioning. In the open they're pretty good, but on the flat with cruise control on I still often see mine flicker +/- 1-2mph of my speed.
Also don't forget the speed camera vans on the bridges. Comfortably drive along with cruise control at 70, spot the van on the bridge umpteen miles away (in most cases they are veeery easily visible) and prepare to brake. Lo and behold, a few hundred yards or less before the bridge with the van a sea of red brake lights of cars braking down to 65 or even less after flying past you (and most likely already having been caught by the speed camera) well in excess of 70 just a few seconds earlier.
@@PedroConejo1939 Very true, but I would say the cammer was starting to catch up during the left part of the turn (could be the police car slowing or a true increase to 32mph…we will never know without long gone data from the police vehicle) made to look worse during the right turn phase, from what I could tell. Agreed there was no need for the officer to start accusations of lying
Hey Ashley! (He says, hoping our host reads the comments occasionally...) What's with the strange fade out that darkens the video for quite a few seconds between clips? On my phone screen it makes the start of the next clip difficult to see in detail. Can you shorten it to a brief swipe or do a quick blend? It would look better :-) Thanks for these though, good callouts!
When the available runway is short and there’s not much of a headwind there is a temptation to trim the hedge on the approach. That plane was probably higher than the camera view suggested though.
As the cammer passes the police car they enter a righthand bend thus the cammer is covering a shorter distance and could quite possibly be going slower than the police car yet still passing.
@@Kris_M While the GPS briefly (approximately 1 second) showed 32mph, if you think the GPS is accurate on a road with that many twists and turns, you're mistaken.
@@cargy930 It showed 32 twice, and I was using the time he needed to pass the police car to be indicative of the speed difference, not the indicated gps speed.
@@Kris_M I refer to my previous comment about the inaccuracy of GPS on twisting roads. I'd like to see your calculations for the speed difference though. That sounds interesting.
@@cargy930 I've put that in another comment. He passes 4 meters of the police car in 3 seconds. That's 3 mph observed difference, of which 1 mph is gonna be from the smaller turn radius for the inner lane.
As a road worker, big thanks to the guy who did a cracking emergency stop and not skittling those workers. That was a great example about why you should take it easy through roadworks, if he'd been racing the lights there there would have been a problem. Also good example of why high vis is important, those reflexes were so instant, there must have been a slight improvement because he saw them 0.08 seconds quicker...
@@DavArc626 clearly they are at fault and probably in bother if their gaffer saw them. But doesn't change the message about safe driving in roadworks. Let's not fall out
I love the fact that the cammer simply explained that his indicated speed was 30 and the coppers response was don't call me a liar. Maybe someone needs to teach him what being called a liar actually means coz he obviously doesn't have a clue
happens all the time. Once over took a cop doing 30 in a 40 zone. He followed me all the way to my destination, did a full car search, background check, breathalizer, the full works on it because I told him "You were doing 10 under on a dual carriageway. Thats wreckless driving. YOU'RE at fault." For about the next month, i seemed to be pulled over every few days for a "Routine random check." If this ever happens to someone, demand their badge numbers and the reason for them stopping you. THen report them for harrassment by the fourth time.
I'm a police officer. The behaviour of that officer was completely shocking and uncalled for and I hope the cammer put a complaint in because he needs a bollocking for that incident. Very very embarassing conduct. My colleagues need to remember that everyone's contact with Police can shape how they view us. This could have been the cammer's first ever real contact with Police and unfortunately it was needlessly negative, and now he may have a more negative perception of Police as a whole. What a shame.
I think the perception isn't aided by the behind-closed-doors nature of said bollockings. Were there a weekly section on local news saying "and this week, Bobby Plod badge number 90210 incorrectly admonished a driver for speeding due to not knowing how corners work, he was suspended for one week without pay", maybe showing bodycam footage or something, the general public would see "oh hey they actually ARE held to some sort of standard!"
As it is now I bet most people, the cammer included, wouldn't even bother complaining about it 'cause there's no point.
And yet this is now the all too common experience most of us have with interacting with police. I've met good ones, but none in the last twenty years. The hiring policy changed. I think these days, courteous, conscientious and principled officers are weeded out at the application stage, in favour of confident, assertive order followers with specific I.Q. ranges. If we had police with principles, they wouldn't obey unlawful edicts from their bosses, like issuing FPN's or arresting street preachers, profiled stop and search , or threatening people with jail for politically incorrect speech. They say a few bad apples spoils the lot, and that's doubly true in the force. If those bad apples are never removed, and we all know that police do NOT grass on their own, then that leaves 'good' officers who are prepared to work with criminals every day. Until I see the scum dealt with, then to me, the rest of you are nothing more than their accomplices, turning a blind eye to the people work with you being villains. I'm sure many police feel like you do, but I've yet to see one upset enough to act. Bad police are hardly ever reported, and when they are, internal investigations invairiably find no wrongdoing. A few of you being above the law makes you ALL rightly hated and mistrusted, because you let them be there. What that officer did was tame, but had the driver disputed his false accusation he'd have been stopped and the police would have gone fishing on him, just to inconvenience him, intimidate him, and exert his power. He's have been I.D'd as a suspected criminal, his vehicle checked with a microscope, and had he continued to insist he was within the speed limit, that officer would have charged him with a crime we all saw didn't happen. No matter who he showed the footage to it would go all the way to court at our public expense, and when shown to be in the right, that officer would not be in court to defend his accusation and no action would be taken against them for abusing their position of authority to intimidate innocent members of the public. So, if police are upset about the lack of respect from the public, maybe, like in this clip, the public are 100% right about exactly how much respect is due. You all wear the same uniform, and you all close ranks around law breakers and psychopaths in your midst, even though you all see what goes on, and you all have the power to arrest these scars on your reputation, so you all deserve the same level of respect. Personally I want the minimum interaction with any of you, even in an emergency. I'd rather deal with it myself, and trust random members of the public than see any of YOUR gang get involved, and it will take one HELL of a police shakeup and a LOT of sackings and at least SOME prosecutions of bad police to change my mind.
@@Asdayasman Sadly my family has had dealings with the Police which shows the standards. If you do go to court, you can't ask for the footage (body or dash), and they'll provide it after proceedings. The footage they do use in court can be edited to their favour, and is fine as its not your evidence. (video it yourself).
A complaint against the Police will only go further if the senior officer allows it to go further. Basically a veto.
Sadly I'm under South Yorkshire polices 'care'. Their reputation is in the cats litter tray as far as I'm concerned. Hillsborough & Rotherham Taxis come to mind. Dealt with them a few times, otherwise OK, but on a community/city level, its non existence presence, Wild West style policing. I live in Darnall Sheffield, which has the HQ only a few miles away, but I hear far more ambulances than police
@@JoesWebPresence I'm on my knees begging you to PLEASE use a paragraph when spewing unreadable garbage.
@@DashCamSheffield "Edited to their favour" makes sense though - no man should be forced to testify against himself. If they omit evidence of them doing wrong, that's not surprising, everyone should be expected to do that, as the burden of proof is on the accuser. I'm assuming by "edited" you mean "cut" of course - I don't imagine anyone is deepfaking police bodycam footage to CYA.
I hear Rotherham has some good history with lawkeeping. You know, with those kids 'n' that. Personally I'd move.
the officer doesn't understand the inside of the corner travels a shorter distance than the outside. should really have some basic logic tests before we hand people so much power
Physics doesn't apply to West Yorkshire police mate,
@@123MondayTuesday nor does the law apply to west Yorkshire police, apparently you can be arrested for calling an inspector a Muppet
In which case if two vehicles are travelling side by side at the same speed the one on the inside would move ahead of the one on the outside.
For the one on the outside it would have to go faster than the one on the inside just to keep up and faster still to overtake.
Not that it matters. The driver did hit 32 for a second or two so the copper is right even if he is a petty prick looking for a conflict.
He doesn't understand he's there to enforce the written law of the land not his own ego.
he should.. they are supposed to be doing far more advanced driving courses than the rest of us
The viewer with the red bonnet seems intent at sharing with others how stupidly he drivers and how many situations that gets him into.
My guess is a young lad who hasn't had enough negative feedback from passengers yet. Amazing how many non incidents happen when you pull back on the speed
Sure he’s driving a Nissan joke as well. Embarassing.
I don't think doing ~50 on the 2nd clip is beyond the pale, but that last incident he was going miles too fast for that residential street. How was he planning to stop at the give way?
my thoughts exactly. three different occasions zooming into hazards and then groaning at the idiocy of everybody around him
@@TyrLimb is it you?
The officer's arrogance through ignorance has actually really annoyed me. Any simple explanation is one step closer to getting arrested, when you've done nothing wrong. The cammer was actually quite calm which i suppose is good.
LOL ! Its never a good idea to trigger a cops ego. " Don't call me a liar" Well done driver for defusing that one !! I mean the classic responce would be "not calling you a liar but I will call you a #####". Its very telling that the driver had to defuse this so basicly doing the cops job. IDK I think I saw him hit 32mph at one point I did not see him speed.
Well at least that officer wasn't chasing someone at 89mph through the Manchester Parrswood council estate and still didn't get them.
All good points, but I think it's asking for trouble passing them. Whenever police are doing slightly under it always feels like a trap to me, unless it's on the motorway where they often sit at 55-65.
@@cestparti7577 I suppose not exacerbating the situation is key 😅.
"Don't call me a liar!"
"Alright then i'll call you a #####!"
👁️👄👁️🚔
Traffic cop doesn't even understand the concept of two cars going round a bend at the same speed and the inner car having less distance to travel. Embarrssing.
8:25 This may be a mild incident, but it's a perfect example of the bullying, self righteous attitude displayed by a significant number of police we see these days.
Crime is rife, Home office announces a clamp down and this is the result. No impact on the real issues people experience, but police trying to put the fear of god into people just going about their merry way so it appears as if they are strict and firm, when really they are just bullies.
I know it's not all police. There are still many officers who are caring and honest. and I salute those people, but I fear they are dwindling. Too many of them these days will simply mindlessly follow orders, even if those orders overreach their powers and infringe rights, which is a VERY dangerous situation.
Maybe the cammer should consider making an official complaint about the Officer’s attitude. Reading other comments on the video, I can see a very negative undertone regarding the police. I agree I think the Officer was out of order with his comments and might have been trying to provoke a situation, which could have led to a booking. Fortunately, the dash cam is without bias and although the Police like dash cam footage of incidents, they need to remember these devices can record their actions as well.
Like the cyclist cycling down a two lane road but with parked cars along his side. A police van clearly close passed, and after he complained, stopped to try and intimidate him, claiming he was riding in the middle of the road and it wasn't a close pass.
No wonder plenty of people have no respect for the police. There was absolutely no need to talk to him like that.
Yes Ashley, the opening crash got my attention alright. It got my attention at the time as well. Other driver said it was my fault. I didn't tell him at the time that I had a dashcam, I just let him tell his mother it was another driver responsible for crashing into her car, and tell her insurance company the same. Until they saw the video and accepted 100% blame immediately
Thanks for sending in! A perfect opening!!
this is one of those cases where the dashcam sees more than the driver. Sees the car earlier and sees it unobstructed. It's nose was on the windshield, and mine wasn't. Well not until after the collision.
The reason for the bad view at the junction is the train line that passes underneath at an angle, and that structure to the right is part of the railway. But also there is a lampost on the other side of the junction. I hit that when my face was nestled in an airbag and it was wobbling over the trainline. Arrives the council in superfast time.
Think any adjudicator worth their salt would have found the other driver at fault from photos but was good to have the dash cam.
Unfortunately there will always be people who will try to weasel out of fault, no matter the circumstances.
@@carusmike I like the way you kept the fact you had a dashcam quiet, let ‘em tangle themselves in lies before you show the video 😁👍
The traffic officer on the second last clip was rude. There was no need for that at all. If he was going to say something, he should have pulled him over, or just let it go. Rude words of advice and the pretentious attitude gives them a bad name, and yes they may have been dealing with something earlier that was stressful, but you don't take it out on the next person you deal with.
Just said the same thing further up. Bolshy coppers are a problem to all and sundry. Not all are like it by any means, but those who are are utter clegg nuts.
"Don't call me a liar", seems like he said it more out of muscle memory. If people are calling you a liar in so many situations that you say it as a reflex, you need to ask why are they doing that.
because most of the people the police deal with are criminals who will do and say almost anything to get away with it
Muscle memory for a thug.
Very poor from the policeman and rude with it. Public servants really need to do better instead of letting their egos get the better of them.
@@DavArc626 uncivil servants
32mph he was speeding.
..does that officer not understand that the inside lane on a corner is shorter, and as such you'll travel through the corner quicker than those in the outside lane while going at the same speed?
With the radius of that bend it would have been a miniscule difference. To get 1mph diff on 30 mph you would need 3.33% difference in turn radius. Estimating from how long it took him to get from the rear corner of the police car to the front corner he was going 2 to 3 mph faster.
And he was getting 32 from the gps for a couple of seconds, although that is also not an accurate way of telling exact speed.
@@Kris_M not to mention a GPS speed reading on a bend will likely read under rather than over
@@BennyHarveyBigMan However, passing under a bridge can interrupt the GPS signal and cause a spike in the displayed speed when it regains it. Natural fluctuation in GPS coordinates has had my dashcam show 1 mph when the car has been parked.
@@Kris_M If it's a 3 metre wide lane, then that means a 90 metre (180 diameter) curve will do the trick. That's a shallow curve by UK standards. It would equate to a roundabout with a circumference of over half a kilometre. So, no, it is not a miniscule difference, and I would judge that curve to be on a radius of significantly less than 90 metres.
@@Kris_M should be looking at distance not speed.
circumference is measured by pi*d.
Lanes are usually 2.5-4m wide. The tighter the curve the more exacerbated the difference will be. on a 100m diameter curve, a single lane of difference will equate to 6% or more difference in diameter. This curve looks close to 50-60m diameter, which means the difference is closer to 10-12%
I have only once been stopped by the police, about thirty years ago when I lived in Manchester. It was an unmarked car that raced up behind me, tailgated, and did all it could to goad me into speeding. I slowed down to let them pass (I thought it was some dickhead), then the blues went on. I stopped immediately, and one of the officers got out to berate me, claiming I had been speeding. I had not, and of course there was no arrest, no charge, because there was no evidence. He was just angry because I hadn't fallen into his trap. I'm generally pro-police but sometimes they really don't help themselves with the law-abiding public.
M55, they’re awful for baiting (dangerously) on there
I had similar driving through Wigan once. I passed a police car that was stuck behind some slow traffic. He shot out and raced up behind me. He put his window down at the next lights and went on a rant about how I was speeding and I was I going to calm it down. He was completely hysterical. I wasn’t speeding, I know the road well and there’s a speed camera on it. I would be stupid to race past that. That idiot has shaped my opinion of the police and this was years ago now.
This is why everyone should have a dashcam.
I'm amazed you're pro-police when so many have this sort of attitude.
8:11- I think as he is in the inside lane, therefore travelling less distance, he would slowly overtake even going at the same speed.
Also car speedometers are set to show you are going faster than you actually are. By law they must show between 100% and 110% of the actual speed so are typically set at 105% to give some degree of tolerance for tyre wear etc.
On the other hand we don't know the accuracy of the GPS speed on the dashcam. There are many factors that can affect that.
@@ditch3827 The GPS was likely affected by passing under the bridge. Briefly cutting the signal will result in a jump in displayed speed when it's regained, it momentarily showing a value higher that the car is actually travelling at. My dashcam has briefly shown over 300 mph in the past as an extreme example of this. I have a 1.6 diesel Focus, so the garage employee driving it at the time didn't actually manage to go that fast.
@@markwright3161 Yup so all in all we cannot say for certain how fast either car was going.
8:00 same reason long distance track runners/cyclists go around the inside of the track and not the outside. And why starting positions are staggered for shorter distances.
The police clip is disappointing to me. The police don't have the best reputation nowadays, and incidents like this don't help to improve it. Doing 32 in a 30 limit is technically illegal, but giving drivers grief about such small infringements really just serves to annoy (and criminalise, if a ticket is issued) people who are essentially law abiding. That gives a bad impression and that bad impression can be long lasting because negative experiences tend to stick in the memory. In the long run, this sort of police behaviour makes their job harder, because the public becomes steadily less cooperative.
Completely correct, I have hated them for so much of my life because they are generally the lowest forms of life on the planet with a high viz and a bit of power. It took me having a car accident about 6 months ago and one of my first decent interactions with one to realise they arent all pricks.
It's all about easy prey and revenue raising. I have to say that over the years and especially the last 3 with the covid bs, I utterly despise them.
You can't be sure what speed someone NEXT to you is doing.
Slight needle width above limit for nano second.
If you break the law you are not law abiding, just want to be able to pick and choose the laws you obey.
@@paul756uk2 Not a single cop in the country cares about "revenue raising".
8:47 "don't call me a liar". A lot of people infer that they are being called a liar under this type of situation. This is not the case it is being alleged that you are mistaken in your assertion that I am incorrect.
They also completely miss the corollary that they are, effectively, calling the cammer a "liar"
@@cargy930 Actually no one called anyone a liar. The policeman asked if the cammer was calling him a liar to which the answer was 'no'. End of.
@@ditch3827 Hi Ditch, good to see you, mate. Hope you're well.
I agree. Hence my use of the qualifier "effectively".
...But I will engage "pedant mode" (just cos I can! 😁): The copper absolutely didn't ask if the cammer was calling him a liar. He told the cammer not to call him a liar (i.e. "Don't call me a liar"). Which isn't the same thing at all. 😛
I do wonder how things would have panned out if the cammer had said it to the copper first though. I seriously doubt that the copper would have taken it with the same grace as the cammer.
@@cargy930 My apologies. I listened again and you are correct.
@@ditch3827 No apology needed, buddy. I was just playing the pedant for laughs.😃
The copper, on the other hand, is a total...
2:10 Good job that cyclist for looking after yourself instead of riding full speed into danger. You slowed down a lot when the car turned into the cycle track and stopped completely when they started coming towards you as who knows what they were about to next. Very good.
I'm not the cyclist in the video, but I'd have done the exact same. When on a bike, you learn pretty quickly to ride as defensively as possible. A few seconds off your journey is better than a few days in hospital.
Jeremy Vine disagrees.
@@Kenjh71 Jeremy Vine is far from representative of most people who ride bikes. If he doesn't get wise soon, he's gunna find himself under a lorry.
Regarding the police clip, it's not as if the cammer was driving like they were at Silverstone. Public opinion and trust are really necessary for the police to do their jobs. Incidents like that only add fuel to the public distrust bonfire. It takes 100 incidents of good policing to overcome 1 incident of bad stuff like this.
Funnily enough that sign with the low flying plane is actually located on the right hand side under the 40mph speed limit sign at 2:45 😂
Well spotted!
Glad I scrolled down a bit, cos I was just about to leave this same comment! It's missing from the left-hand side sign, for some reason, but yeah it's there! Easily missed though so I can understand the driver or passenger (whoever was speaking) being surprised by the low aircraft.
Came here to say exactly the same thing 😂
That policeman was goading viewer into an argument. I would probably have wound my window up and ignored him.
Agree with that. Well handled.
That's the quickest way to get a smashed window, an electric shock and a night in the cells
I think the copper was having a bad day and was in the mood for a flex.
I had similar once. Passed a copper in a 40 doing 40 he pulled me over for a chat. Funny part was we both set off and both turned in to the same road as the police station was one end I lived the other.
That's how I saw it too. That, or on a power trip.
Copper was a liar. Ego tripping.
They all seem to have an awful lot of bad days then. All day every day.
@@wl660 I don't think he was lying but he was mistaken and his reaction to having that pointed out was well out of order.
Abuse of police power like this should achieve a minimum of 1 month unpaid leave. Absolutely pathetic.
Tell me about it, you calmly explain their ignorance and they red mist. Then "You're" the one having a go 🤷. I'd have just been like, "I'll send my dashcam footage in buddy it has my speed on there".
@@rufusgreenleaf2466 Trigger a cops ego at your own risk !
It has to be said that the footage of the police officer abusing his position sounded very much like it had been submitted by a white guy - I thought that this sort of stuff was all to do with race or misogyny and nothing to do with generally being unsuitable to hold such an office, period???? Did the cammer then go and break into the local supermarket and ransack it?
@@cestparti7577 What doesn't trigger a cops ego these days, you can't say anything but "sorry sir" and "yes sir". In a situation that wasn't your fault it's essentially gagging you for no reason. Yeah the video annoyed me but to be honest i do try to defuse, so i wouldn't be risky at all.
Poorly judged by the officer but it really shouldn't warrant a minimum of 1 month unpaid leave. Police should be held to account for abuse of power, but this wasn't an abuse, just arrogance and misreading the situation. Ideally they should be confronted about their attitude here, but saying this should result in that kind of punishment is childish
In the police clip, if the dashcam is showing around 28-30mph then the speedometer is probably showing 31-33 (although it seems to vary slightly by manufacturer), which is probably not worth giving someone a warning over.
16 seems a bit too fast but I think a sign showing there's a junction just after the hill would be helpful. That's a dangerous place to emerge from since it's behind the hill and just after the change in speed limit. 17 seems fine in terms of speed, the driver successfully avoided that terrible overtake.
You'd think a police officer would be aware of the GPS vs speedo mph difference, but nah, he was looking for a fight.
As I understand it, the offence is simply to be travelling above a certain speed, rather than to believe or know you are doing so. Unlike many things in law, your "intent" is not taken into account.
@@1hd3szfgrdm13 How do you know the officer was looking at his GPS instead of his speedometer?
@@GeorgeFoot Yes that is true. Although there's usually meant to be a tolerance buffer above the speed limit, probably to avoid disagreements over speedo vs gps vs radar differences. Most places seem to go for +10% + 2mph.
The speedometer has yo show the maximum speed you could be doing. Mine reads 40mph but roadside speed displays show 36-37mph.
Clip 21 with the policeman - I would send the clip in including my speed to the police department. It would hopefully make them think a bit better next time. Absolute power trip
you might want to edit out the part where the indicated speed exceeded 30.
@@kenbrown2808 Why?
I do hope you aren't trying to imply that a GPS speed is in any way accurate on either a bend or gradient.
@@cargy930 of course not. it's not a certified calibrated speedometer. like the one in the police car that was cruising at 30 MPH, while the camera car caught up with him, even before he went for the inside line on the corner, where despite his claims otherwise, his indicated speed hit 32 MPH.
@@kenbrown2808 You said _"you might want to edit out the part where the indicated speed exceeded 30"_
The copper's speedo isn't *in* the clip. So what exactly are you suggesting needs to be edited out for the OP's suggested complaint to the Police?
Or are you still just assuming the GPS is accurate *despite the twisting road?*
@@cargy930 the part where the speed readout ashley circled read 32 MPH. are you still assuming the drivers claim that his indicated speed was below 30 MPH is not belied by showing an indicated speed above 30 MPH?
and again, the fact that he caught up with the police officer BEFORE he went for the racing line while the officer was maintaining 30 MPH by his CALIBRATED speedomoeter and the GPS showed a lower speed indicates either the cammer's speedomoeter was reading low, or it did indicate a speed over 30 MPH.
bottom line is: arguing with a cop who gives a verbal warning in passing is almost as stupid as deciding to overtake a cop.
1:15 - And driving without headlights on in the dusk, seems to be a popular thing now days.
"I'm not calling you a liar, I'm just saying you're wrong."
4:18 I call this STS'ing - it's not driving, it's Sitting There, Steering.
The Police officer didn't have a train set or Scalextric track as a kid, he is just upset at the missed learning opportunity and is taking it out on people in their day-to-day life.
Is the speedo on a police car actually calibrated or would it be a standard factory one?
the cammer was in the same lane as the police car most of the time that he was catching up.
@@123MondayTuesday At one point it was actually calibrated. Nowadays though I doubt it. Various police documentaries show them flying down a motorway at 160 mph (indicated) in factory cars limited to 155 mph by German legislation (so accurately 155 mph). It becomes apparent that this factory limiter isn't removed from police cars when they try to chase down a fleeing BMW or similar. Once they hit their 155 mph limiter, and the police following the same, the police don't gain even slightly on them, but their speedometer still shows 160 mph, just like the civilian cars will.
When this officer first joined, they probably were calibrated, just like how the police probably had more powerful engines in the 'cooking model's' body. The last of those was the last Vectra. The police had some estates with the VXR engine, but without the VXR bodywork. The likes of which have not been around for over a decade now.
Red car driver displaying the textbook behaviour of driving around and not being prepared for anything other than an absolutely clear road ahead. In almost all of their clips.
For what it's worth it might be a good idea to complain to the force about that officer's conduct as he seems the type who is well too eager to abuse his power. A part of life which was hard to prove before the wide adoption of dash cams.
The cop was out on an ego trip but the cammer made himself an easy target by actually speeding over 30 for a bit there. When ever a cop is around, I always make sure to drive extra slow so that way they don't give you a ticket for doing 1 over the limit for a split second. Don't give them any excuses to pull you over. If they're in front of you, keep your distance and make sure you're slow enough so they pull away. If others want to blast past you, let them and let them become someone else's problem.
Personal blind spots are a big issue when people get behind the wheel. You'll do well to not get in their way. They'll only blame you for their mistakes.
exactly. deciding to overtake a police officer in a marked car has to be one of the clearest examples of poor decision making you can give.
@@kenbrown2808 Doesn't matter whether it's a marked police car or just regular traffic. He was doing 30 mph, only reason he was able to overtake was because he was on the inside of the turn, no excuse from the officer to speak to him in that manner, it just shows even police officers can't handle being overtaken, just like morons in merge in turn situations.
@goreylfc1 no. He was in the same lane as the officer most of the time he was catching up.
@@kenbrown2808 So? That would just mean the officer isn't driving consistently at 30 mph. It's not illegal to overtake an officer lol.
@goreylfc1 or it means the cammer really was speeding even though he denied it. But you don't want to hear that because rozzers bad.
That ANPR camera flashing away in the police car was interesting, I guess it was IR flashes and only visible in the dashcam as it's probably got a weak IR filter to allow better night vision... maybe.
I think all video cameras can pick up infra red light - you can try it with your TV remote if you have a camera - I haven't tried it with a phone, bit it should work
@@junkyardmagicYep, phone cameras are a great way to see if your TV remote is working.
"Usually you'll find a sign warning you of this prior to it happening"... @2:46 showing the sign, and then on the right hand side of the screen the exact sign is below the 40mph sign.
I lived in Australia many years ago and every year without fail was attacked by breeding and nesting magpies whilst walking down the shops.
They attack anything and everything. You either had to walk down with an umbrella, a long stick which was held up so it was taller than you or a hat with a set of eyes sewn into the back of it because they would usually attack from rear and if they saw the eyes they would hopefully be scared off.
Oh and definately keep an eye
out for drop bears 🐻
Speaking of dogs though, we did have one in our suburb that loved chasing cars and attempting to bite your tyres as you were moving! 🤣😂🤣
What a weird road layout! 7:05 Technically whilst this piece of tarmac may be there with a give way etc, no one should ever actually drive down it. This set of traffic lights only seems to have a green filter arrow pointing left and Rule 177 says you have to go in the direction of the arrow.
Magpies are awesome. My cat brought one in last summer - still alive thankfully. Managed to catch the little fellow and set him free in the garden, where he promptly flew to the top of a 4ft fence post within easy pouncing distance, and started verbally abusing the cat, before spending the next hour taunting her around the garden, staying just out of reach 😂
When I was in foster care I lived close to a military air base (in Belgium) and the road passing next to it had traffic lights which switched on when a plane was about to land or take off
@5:16 I have a new rule I'm starting to teach my students: Never pass the row of cars beside you at more than 20 mph (or 30 km/h) faster than their speed.
I've heard the following suggestion for motorbike filtering (lane splitting) in the UK.
But the way I commuted on a dual carriageway, was just to rejoin the queue if it reached 20 mph. Hand covering the brake lever too. If a gap appeared, I expected someone to move across suddenly.
"The 20:20 rule - filtering safely
There is a school of thought that says filtering is safe as long as the traffic you are overtaking is travelling at no more than 20mph and you are overtaking them at no more than an additional 20mph.
This rule will cap filtering speeds at 40mph and it is thought that the police will not intervene with anyone filtering at that speed.
Again, however, it is worth stressing that this is a school of thought rather than a hard and fast rule.
If a police officer determines that you are filtering unsafely, carelessly or too quickly, you could still be stopped, even if you haven’t broached the 40mph limit."
What are the chances that the HGV driver beckoned them to cross? Since watching this channel for the past year I've stopped all flashing of lights / waving on / encouraging others to move. I had a habit of just looking forward and signalling for them to go, without looking for dangers behind.
I like the 2 lanes into 1... a simple procedure (the zip code) it also highlights the Selfishiteads!
2:44 there was that exact sign under the 40 speed limit sign on the right hahah
Well spotted. That sign should be in a much better priority position.
I’m sure Ashley noticed that and purposefully put that sign up.
Police officer clearly has some ego issues! Granted, the overtaker was going over the speed limit and wasn't the smartest to go over the limit next to a police car, but it was by 2-3mph at most. The officer didn't need to honk the horn and definitely didn't need to have a go. Someone's got too much time on their hands!
it was not over the limit at the time he overtook though, before, yes, but at the point he overtook no.
Copper : Don't call me a liar!
My response : Why not? As recent news has proved you could be a lot worse!!!!
Am I missing something at 2:46, this exact sign is present to the right.
Just in case you didn't realise, at 2:45 when you point out that sometimes there is a warning sign for low aircraft, there is actually one on the right hand side of the road below the "Lower Uphum" sign. It does seem quite small and is on the "wrong" side of the road though.
Also, to add, there are some places (One of the roads near RAF Brize Norton comes to mind) where the sign is coupled with the flashing lights you get at level crossings, for larger aircraft. I happened to have to wait for one (a Globemaster iirc) to land once!
I used to commute past the end of a runway with those warning lights (33 years of it). One day they did not come on and a military aircraft passed over me with about 5m clearance, that's a surprise when it happens.
hi training glider pilot here, 2:50 looks like there was a sign in the clip on the left. sometimes on small airstrips it is necessary to use all the runway as pilots must ensure they have enough time to perform a go around
The amount of people that refuse to merge in turn is amazing.
Solution: signs telling to merge in-turn and education on radio.
It's peasant mentality, something like we all must queue an equal amount of time, and I got here first bs. Just view them with the pity and contempt they deserve.
It's always just best solved by yielding to any helmets that think they're entitled to go first. Denying them their petty ego boost is simply not worth the hassle in dealing with them or potentially causing an incident.
@@artemkatelnytskyi Plenty of signs saying MERGE IN TURN or USE BOTH LANES in recent months, at least in my area. Idiots still don't, and some actively try to block others from using all the space.
@@1hd3szfgrdm13 I notice that some experienced drivers tend to only see give way signs. Thanks God for that at least.
5:43 it never ceases to amaze me how willing ppl are to win the smallest of victories
Merge In Turn - nothing could be easier. One from the left, one from the right - and repeat.
Amazing how many drivers cannot grasp this simple concept.
Or they do grasp it, they just don't act on it. Eternal self-importance and all that.
I first took driving lessons in 1997. For a variety of reasons, I didn't pass a test until 2010. I only heard the term 'merge in turn' last year watching Ashley's videos. None of the instructors I drove with used the term, my copy of the Highway Code doesn't include use of the term. To drivers of my age then, it's just pushing in.
I don't think it's not being able to grasp a concept, it's that no-one told us about the concept to start with.
1:40 I think they thought they were going to get rear ended. It looks like the Kuga and Zafira braked quite hard.
Generalisations are the foundation of science, but can also serve the survival instinct. In my general driving observations, women don't look, young men tailgate, drivers of German cars don't indicate, and lycra cyclists look for trouble.
2:46 You can see said sign to the right of the screen below the "Lower upham" sign
7:45 I never saw a speed limit sign so idk if he was even speeding. Seems like he was doing a good speed to me.
Street lights, no repeaters - the only safe assumption is 30mph.
The conversation seemed to suggest 30 mph was the limit. The brief display of 32 mph needs to be taken with a pinch of salt though as they were passing under a bridge at the time. GPS speed displays like those used by dashcams can indicate a momentarily higher speed than is actually being driven at if the signal is interrupted by anything, like a large structure of concrete and steel. They could have been at a consistent 28 mph through there but the GPS signal dropping out caused it to calculate the speed from 2 coordinates further apart than they actually were for the same time elapsed.
@@markwright3161 yeah and even if he did go 2 mph over for 1 second, shouldn't be enough to warrant warning him about.
Nice to see quite a few clips from around my area. Especially that plane clip, might have to journey down that road more often to see that spectacular!
I saw this video two days ago and the incident with the police has really played on my mind. The cammer appeared to remain calm when talking but the police person spoke in an intimidating manner, which bordered on aggressive. I don’t know how I would have reacted to this kind of intimidation, but top marks to the cammer, and zero marks to the police.
Consider this: Have they've gone over the speed limit yet claim their speedo is reporting below the real speed? So yes, by inference they've accused the officer of lying? They're saying I was doing 30 when I overtook you, not more. But they actually say I was doing 27 because my speedo showed 30? So to overtake the cop car by inference the cop car was doing around 24 when they overtook? The officer claimed to be doing 30 and they've said, basically, no it was 24? They didn't say my speedo showed 33 but is actually 30, why not?
As an Australian I can say I could see a thousand spiders and a million snakes but nothing's more scary then a Magpie during breeding season, they'll go at you none stop until you're 5km away from their nest
I'm glad you didn't add any commentary over the clip of the female cyclist, she said it all!
Lady Penelope...
Kudos to the person in clip 14. Shows the benefit of paying 100% attention instead of 90% and their stopping distance was impressively small.
Let’s hope the cop watches this. Let’s hope that he listens to himself accuse the driver of something that he didn’t say. The driver didn’t call him a liar or infer it either. He was providing his own explanation which he is entitled. You wouldn’t want this copper to nick you. He’d be busy making up the evidence.
4:06 been down that motorway a few times, trust me, its a glutton for accidents, passed one last week as well
the viewer with the red bonnet is an accident waiting to happen, with very unpredictable rates of speed change he makes it a nightmare for other drivers to know what he is doing.
2:45 there is a aircraft warning sign on the post on the left, it's small but it is there.
That arrogant officer reminded me of a time I was pulled over by police in Ilfracombe after I overtook a car on a duel carriageway in a 60 zone. One of the police said "It stands to reason you must have been speeding back in the 30 zone to have caught then(the other driver) up. So in their head, that is the only possibility.
What actually happened was I was driving out of the town and the other driver pulled out of a side road ahead of me, went up to (and possibly over) 30, then slowed to 20 because they lit up one of those 30mph warning signs. Meanwhile, me in my car, happily cruising with my cruise control on at 29, like I always do (probably too much really) caught the other driver up. Then when they failed to accelerate once we reached the 60 zone, I used the outside lane of the dual carriageway to overtake them. Given that the police said they suspected me for drink driving, I think they had already determined they were going to suspect someone of it that evening, and they chose me, even though once I had pulled over they could see all my fishing tackle in my car, as I had just been sea fishing.
One thing the officer didn't consider when he made the assumption, is that the road was not a straight one and they were obviously not around to see us in the 30 zone. There are no roads to turn off to for several hundred yards, after that 30mph LED warning sign, which means, if I was going over 30mph when they weren't around to see me, they must have been doing over 30mph themselves to have caught us up, when we wouldn't have been in view to them due to the bends.
20 years ago the gamekeepers wife on the estate got off the bus and ran across the front of the bus and into the road without looking. A guy overtook the bus without slowing down and threw her up the road. Result? She was three months in a hospital bed and eighteen months of physio to learn to walk again. Now I always overtake large stationary vehicles with utmost caution, keeping as far from their side as I can, trying to see underneath for feet or shadows, and am ready to put the anchors on if someone walks out without looking. More and more I think we need to ask ourselves 'what if?' and drive accordingly.
And we could actually see those guys setting off just before the cammer passed the back of the lorry. Nice save though, but a bit of forethought might have saved his pants from being soiled......
2:30 I think low-flying light aircraft must be a common sight at this location. The road sign says Lower Upham and a quick search reveals there's a tiny little airfield on the right hand side of the road, as you approach the town on the B2177. On Google Maps, you can see that the runway is really close to the road! Definitely a good place to put up the aircraft warning sign Ashley shows.
A low fighting plane sign was visible to the right of the road. Below a 40mph sign.
It's near Higher Upham!
I zoned in on that one and it's a road I've used over the last 40 plus years as it's Not too far from where i live and close to marwell zoo. I had no idea there was an airfield there.
Yeah, glideslope puts you very low when you're over the road, cool to see.
@@paul756uk2 +1 ! I have lived in this part of Hants for over 50 years and didn't know about this airfield until now.
2:46 weird that the low flying aircraft sign is on the right-hand side of the road, could easily be missed
"Don't call me a liar" said the liar to the person who didn't call him a liar.
All he had to say was, "mind your speed mate, my calibrated speedometer has me doing bang-on 30. Have a good day." Or just let it go -- in the grand scheme of things it was nothing.
Meanwhile, there's hundreds of clips uploaded to TH-cam of drivers dangerously jumping red lights or doing other completely insane nonsense that doesn't get prosecuted.
@@defragsbin Exactly, and at most he nudged 32 for a second, certainly not enough for the copper to even notice, probably didn't even hit 32 due to inaccuracy of GPS.
Just a copper who got hurt by being overtaken, a common occurrence of some moronic road users.
The microlight aircraft was landing at Solent Flight's grass air strip near Southampton. It is very narrow but also quite short so the pilot would want to land as close to the beginning of the strip as possible. I estimate he crossed the road at about 20 feet, which seems entirely reasonable. It's unlikely the local authority would put up 'low flying' warning plates on the road for such a strip.
Actually there is a sign if you look by the speed signs on the right
I would have called him a liar after he said not to. Trouble is people without dashcams just have to put up with this behaviour.
and I wouldn't have overtaken him to begin with. and if I had been so stupid as to decide to overtake, my response to being called out would be, "sorry, officer, my speedo must be reading low." the expression one of my local officers taught me for that scenario is "he talked himself into a ticket"
2:46 - the landing aircraft hazard sign can be seen to the right of the picture :)
8:52 The cop *is* a liar, and I'd happily call him it to his face. The cop's wrong about his speedometer, it's not "calibrated". It's the same as all other cars: about 10% inaccurate. But like so many cops, he's knows nothing.
So why bother provoking him? The police car was travelling close to the limit, the cammer obviously wasn't prepared to overtake him, so he sat in the blind spot like a berk achieving nothing except annoying the copper..
@@davidjones332 In what way did he "provoke" the copper?
@@davidjones332 how do those boots taste?
@@davidjones332 Provoking the copper in to slowing down? Apart from a couple of jumps above 30 on an imperfect measure like speed cam GPS the guy broke no laws. Then when the guy was showing sub 30 on the GPS, the cop was still falling behind. So the Cop exaggerated the issue just to have a little "i am" moment. People like you are why the cops will just pressure the average person because you just cede to the smallest presence. They need to learn they are here to serve us, not have a little rant for a micro aggression.
Police vehicle speedometers are actually calibrated. It is probably all software tweaks now with digital cockpits, but for the dials components in the cluster were swapped and tuned/measured to be within a much tighter tolerance.
2:59 But did the cammer spot the approaching danger? Didn’t seem to react until after the event. Definitely a learning point for me to look at the approaching traffic and ask yourself “are they stopping?” 99.9% of the time it will be yes, but you’re ready for that one time.
7:22. If I am the blue Merc and the cammer asked for my insurance details because I made him kerb his wheel. Would I be in my right to refuse to give them to him Ash?
Given that vehicle damage took place involving a third party, you would technically be required to provide details.
Failure to do so could involve the Police and a S172 request to the registered keeper.
7:08 How would you work out when there about to move? No lights in site.
I find in general a portion of the British public drive and even live their lives with a "me first" selfish self-entitled attitude. I have come to the realisation that I too was falling into this habit of becoming combative to retain my place and space and found it was actually affecting my mental state with heightened anxiety and stress overall. Whilst battling the stresses of daily life with everything in the news, work and environment, an easy outlet can be found on the the roads where someone else is at fault when invading on 'your right'. I have changed my attitude and now drive with much more clarity, patience and focus. I give myself adequate room for error and if someone else wants to barge ahead so be it. I would rather have them in front than behind. I feel calm driving now than in the past and feel proud and satisfied after journeys in the car. It has also made me appreciate the privilege of driving again. People, please rid yourselves of your inconsiderate attitudes and be considerate of others, no matter who they are. We all have different abilities and everyone can make mistakes. The lack of proper planning and maintenance of the roads is enough to contend with without the addition of your entitlement. FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS
Fella at 03:47 stopped on the cycle box too
You're actually allowed to if the light turns red while you're on it!
Still, the cammer possibly should have held back, but I'm not sure the numpty on the wrong side would get the idea then!
I would have scolded that police officer for inappropriate use of the horn if he did that to me... Cammer wasn't exactly racing around, was he? 😂
32mph he was speeding.
6:58 That’s a silver Mitsubishi. 🤣
At 2.46 ( plane landing), I love that the name of the village is 'Lower Upham' 🤣. Like you said Ash, they come in quite low at Woodvale, but not that low !!!!👍
That is one of the lowest I have seen. I used to go past a small airfield daily that did sight seeing flights. When the wind was in the right direction I tried to time my journey to coincide with a landing 👍
Something graceful about aerodynamics in action
The A490 at Welshpool airport can be like that (great butties in the airport cafe, btw). There's a place near me called Came Down. No airport though, that would be the icing on the cake.
@@smilerbob they don't come in lower but the planes are a lot bigger coming in low over the A38 at Bristol Airport. Also some Heathrow landings when the wind is easterly(?) over the M25 can be pretty low.
@@FFVoyager indeed. There was a road near Gatwick that was good for watching the planes come in until the police come along and ask you to “move along”. Great for watching the A380 land as well as the edge of the runway was a short distance over the fence
@@PedroConejo1939 I’ll have to remember that one if I’m ever in that area. Thanks and good to know the food is nice as well 👍
7:33, clip starting now:-
Either traffic or firearms. If traffic, likely to have a calibrated device on board, but that may not be in main view of the driver. Possible mere differential between two speedos.
Personally, were I the cop, I’d have let a slight difference slide, even IF looking at the calibrated device.
Since when did an ego tell the truth about others speeds...
I watched some of the 'Drive like a driving instructor.' videos.
So now, not only do I drive as if Ashley's in the passenger seat, I have a police car behind me, too.
It seems I'm going to have to put one in front, as well.
Thank goodness for brown trousers.
2:45 pause and look, there's actually a road sign. By the tone i assume Ashley missed it.
clip at 5:20 I've had a similar thing except I was on a motorbike and they were on a bicycle, we both came off but luckily no harm done except for a broken gear selector
5:20 Ah yes, they were wearing the hi-viz invulnerability clothing, so were therefore completely safe. Similar thing: the other day I saw a DPD van whizzing round residential streets far too fast, BUT he had his flashing hazard lights on the whole time. As if that made it safe. These things are just psychological crutches for the weak-minded.
That is a psychological effect called Risk Compensation and affects EVERYONE who thinks what they are doing/wearing/using makes them 'safer'. It's why the moronic calling for 'headlights' in daylight for vehicles and helmet wearing for cyclists is quite probably a disbenefit.
@@FFVoyager I hear what you're saying and mostly agree, but I'd take cycle helmets off your list; A) They do have some practical protective function and B) Making them compulsory would at least provide some (limited) ammunition in getting idiots like those at 3:34 off the road.
3:14 so what type of vehicle do you think it was?
Recumbent bicycle.
QuattroVelo
tesla? maybe? they have cameras everywhere
With regards to the police clip #21), the cammer was on the very limit of 30mph and unclear if the jump to 32mph was due to incorrect GPS lock on the camera or a genuine 32mph. I suspect the downhill gradient temporarily increased the speed slightly. Either way, could easily be used against the cammer…in my opinion
One thing I saw often on the motorway in the past was a police vehicle doing 60mph in lane one and a massive queue of cars doing 60-62mph in lane 2 scared of overtaking. Don’t see it so much these days
The inside lane of a bend will overtake a vehicle on the outside lane of the curve if they're travelling at the same speed. This is school sports level of understanding which the copper should know about. That's why the overtake only happened on the right hand bends and the relative speed dropped off on the left hand bends. No-one's saying the copper was lying, that was an inappropriate response, but I do believe he was mistaken. That notwithstanding, I've met enough bolshy coppers not to bother overtaking them unless they're obviously driving well below the limit. It's always their word against yourn.
Im not 100% sure, but i recall that speedometers in cars are required to be calibrated such that they can never show a speed slower than what the car is actually doing (as speedometers are never 100% accurate)
I wonder how evidentially sound a dash cam's coordinates, let alone speed calculation, are in court, especially around flyovers interfering with line of sight and changes in elevation affecting overall positioning. In the open they're pretty good, but on the flat with cruise control on I still often see mine flicker +/- 1-2mph of my speed.
Also don't forget the speed camera vans on the bridges. Comfortably drive along with cruise control at 70, spot the van on the bridge umpteen miles away (in most cases they are veeery easily visible) and prepare to brake. Lo and behold, a few hundred yards or less before the bridge with the van a sea of red brake lights of cars braking down to 65 or even less after flying past you (and most likely already having been caught by the speed camera) well in excess of 70 just a few seconds earlier.
@@PedroConejo1939 Very true, but I would say the cammer was starting to catch up during the left part of the turn (could be the police car slowing or a true increase to 32mph…we will never know without long gone data from the police vehicle) made to look worse during the right turn phase, from what I could tell.
Agreed there was no need for the officer to start accusations of lying
Hey Ashley! (He says, hoping our host reads the comments occasionally...) What's with the strange fade out that darkens the video for quite a few seconds between clips? On my phone screen it makes the start of the next clip difficult to see in detail. Can you shorten it to a brief swipe or do a quick blend? It would look better :-)
Thanks for these though, good callouts!
5:28 Remember, the cones are there to protect workers. Shame the workers don't know how to protect themselves. Nice reactions there.
Man 1 reaches out and holds back Man 2. Woman 1 is left to enter the danger without obstruction. Not exactly equal rights
@@123MondayTuesday last time i checked humans dont have arms that are 2 metres long lol
5:45 What is really mind boggling there is how much of a gap there is behind both cars, so one car just needed to pause and create room.
The second the police officer started going off on one I would have closed my window and ignored them.
When the available runway is short and there’s not much of a headwind there is a temptation to trim the hedge on the approach. That plane was probably higher than the camera view suggested though.
Banger start
Edit: 9:00 perfect song to accompany this funny clip.
I find that at any given moment, the urge to sing "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" is just a whim away...
A whim away
A whim away
A whim away...
Car is speeding in clip 16, albeit below the speed limit when the incident occurs. Is well below the speed limit in clip 17
6:42 How many brake pads does this driver get through per year??
-per year- per month
FTFY! 😁
I swear that's Hanley tesco @ 1:21 been a few accidents near that exit
As the cammer passes the police car they enter a righthand bend thus the cammer is covering a shorter distance and could quite possibly be going slower than the police car yet still passing.
Many are commenting this, but he was going 2 to 3 mph faster which cannot be accounted for by a turn with that turn radius.
@@Kris_M While the GPS briefly (approximately 1 second) showed 32mph, if you think the GPS is accurate on a road with that many twists and turns, you're mistaken.
@@cargy930 It showed 32 twice, and I was using the time he needed to pass the police car to be indicative of the speed difference, not the indicated gps speed.
@@Kris_M I refer to my previous comment about the inaccuracy of GPS on twisting roads.
I'd like to see your calculations for the speed difference though. That sounds interesting.
@@cargy930 I've put that in another comment. He passes 4 meters of the police car in 3 seconds. That's 3 mph observed difference, of which 1 mph is gonna be from the smaller turn radius for the inner lane.
Yes... it most certainly did get my attention!
3:25 a recumbant?
As a road worker, big thanks to the guy who did a cracking emergency stop and not skittling those workers. That was a great example about why you should take it easy through roadworks, if he'd been racing the lights there there would have been a problem. Also good example of why high vis is important, those reflexes were so instant, there must have been a slight improvement because he saw them 0.08 seconds quicker...
@@DavArc626 clearly they are at fault and probably in bother if their gaffer saw them. But doesn't change the message about safe driving in roadworks. Let's not fall out