Always love the loud pounding call to arms instrumental at the beginning: dun... dun-dah... dunnnn-dah-dah! 🎵🎶 Especially on a Monday morning. I need to start my classes like that. Make sure everyone is awake and paying attention. 😅
Only if that crime is committed IN an ICC country - ie, Israel is tried because Palestine is a member, the USA is tried because Afghanistan is a member
@ the US has been investigated, but no warrants have been issued, so not tried (like, brought before the court for a trial). I guess I'm speaking hypothetically in the case of the US. in the case of Israel, if the ICC arrest awrrant were fulfilled, the Israeli leaders would be brough to the Hague to undergo a trial-- but this also hasnot' happened, because the leaders haven't actually been arrested
It’s probably just as relevant. War crimes that haven’t been committed should be brought to justice, and will help to deter future crime. The Israeli apartheid state and settler violence aren’t at an end, and Israeli will almost certainly continue to be aggressive towards Palestine- in this context, anything that prevents future war crimes is good.
Thank you so much Debate Track, I just had a couple of questions for you. For the topic of Sovereignty and Congress People as the AFF side how would I try to rebut that idea since it is so clearly harming Americans. Secondly, on Moral Credibility(AFF arg.) - is the counter to that just the US doesnt add much value as stated in the CON? Once again thank you so much for a detailed and intresting video😊
Always love the loud pounding call to arms instrumental at the beginning: dun... dun-dah... dunnnn-dah-dah! 🎵🎶
Especially on a Monday morning. I need to start my classes like that. Make sure everyone is awake and paying attention. 😅
Hell yah, at some point these videos will just evolve into a performance of the whole Symphony. New symphony performance each month !
Babe wake up Joel dropped a new pf ta
This is one of my first time watching debate track and it was awesome and really helpful! ty!
heck yah, happy it helped! thanks for watching--
Hey Joel, I just wanted some clarification. If a non ICC member commits a war crime, there is a way to try them or they simply cannot be tried?
Only if that crime is committed IN an ICC country - ie, Israel is tried because Palestine is a member, the USA is tried because Afghanistan is a member
@@DebateTrack So the US has been tried before by the ICC?
@ the US has been investigated, but no warrants have been issued, so not tried (like, brought before the court for a trial). I guess I'm speaking hypothetically in the case of the US. in the case of Israel, if the ICC arrest awrrant were fulfilled, the Israeli leaders would be brough to the Hague to undergo a trial-- but this also hasnot' happened, because the leaders haven't actually been arrested
time to listen to this on repeat while playing minecraft so I can actually do something for the debate meet soon.
😁😁 knowledge is half the battle
Does the recent cease-fire affect the arguments or make it less relevant to use it in cases?
It’s probably just as relevant. War crimes that haven’t been committed should be brought to justice, and will help to deter future crime.
The Israeli apartheid state and settler violence aren’t at an end, and Israeli will almost certainly continue to be aggressive towards Palestine- in this context, anything that prevents future war crimes is good.
Thank you so much Debate Track, I just had a couple of questions for you. For the topic of Sovereignty and Congress People as the AFF side how would I try to rebut that idea since it is so clearly harming Americans. Secondly, on Moral Credibility(AFF arg.) - is the counter to that just the US doesnt add much value as stated in the CON? Once again thank you so much for a detailed and intresting video😊
What's your take on the Israel Palestine AFF argument/how do you feel it'll run for judges across the circuit?
1. I have no idea, I never debate and rarely judge 2. I’d guess it’s very circuit dependent, would run different in Portland than in Dallas
oh boy!
19:49
37:20
26:20
32:10
roman stature
Ignore this- timestamps
4:53 & 5:04 q otdtd: a4a
6:38 , ?relationship to i i and applicability… k&r
10:40, a4a- responsibility
11:30 , aff revokes HAA
12:10 a4a imp, do, ng, taking idea 1 to an extreme. A4a