@@budoshi-f2l - trying to be clever you made two mistakes illustrating greater illiteracy. You meant to say "decent" rather than "descent", and since fouls is plural you need to correct both your pronoun and verb: "Well they were some decent fouls".
The timewasting one was a bit harsh in my opinion, it took5 sec in the video (we dont see when did she started that tho) . All the others were completly deserved, yeah.
Assemblies on the pitch should not be allowed, mainly after scoring a goal I don't know why every one is invited to attend a scoring event (both in men's and women's matches). Even substitue players enter the field which is punishable if the rules are correctly aplied (No one can enter or leave the pitch without consulting the ref. In addition the "six" second rule that keepers have to follow are seldomly applied. The entire function of a ref should be revised by the FIFA. Watch a field hockey game to get an idea. No protests there and the ball is brought immediately in play after a ref 's decision. Wating for a signal of the ref before a free kick can be taken is ridiculous.
@@Rinus-et6qs When stopped with a whistle, restart with a whistle Opponent has to place himself 5m off the ball Ref needs the time to replace himself There is a difference between direct and indirect free kick Advantage can play a role in an indirect free kick, the player taking the kick has to mark, or point at the ball, with his hand or his feet
@@deepdivedelight Your description of an indirect or free kick is somewhat confusing to me. In the rules book of FIFA there is no indication that a ref has to signal to continue the game but I do not reed the rules book every month or so. Anyay, I think it makes the match faster.
@@Rinus-et6qs I don't have my FIFA-USSF book handy, but I can assure that if he stopped the game with a whistle, he must restart it with a whistle. He any case, the referee can't stop the game without using his whistle. They are supposed to carry two, in case they lose one during the game.
Every card that was given during that match, was 100% correct. Complaining against the ref = yellow card, timewasting = yellow card,... People who play football should learn that the ref in always in charge, and not the other way arround... I'm suprised the ref didn't show more yellow or red cards during that match, seeing how many times she was surrounded by players complaing about her descissions...
@@abbielester5419 The red came because the player had already received a yellow earlier in the match. The time wasting offense was a second yellow, and upon receiving two yellows in the same match, the player also receives a red and is disqualified out of the game. Hope that clears up your confusion some.
@@abbielester5419actually, she got a yellow card for delaying the restart, she just had a yellow already. The rule is simple, she shouldve seen it coming
There something called nuance. Not everything has to be by the book. If such fouls were given cards in the men's game, the match wouldn't even last more than 20mins
Sorry. Great ref. All those decisions looked correct in the context shown here. Dissent, really the issue is with the player/s, unfair to blame the referee. Does anyone think those decisions were wrong???
All refs should be as severe as this one. Rules are rules. There was not a single disputable card here. All of them correct, warranted and dished out like the boss that this ref is.
Greenwood took 26 seconds to take a damn free kick. If you waste time, you get booked. All the comments are emotionally charged ones from her 'England' teammates and friends from the National set up. It's a yellow card and she was already on a yellow. So that's red
Every one a valid booking. Some players think that, because they are international players, they can show DESCENT(comical). As though the rules don't apply to them. Most too thick to accept that when on a yellow, you have to be careful.
Teams don't generally start timewasting after just 35 minutes, it isn't clear Greenwood was timewasting and the referee does not appear to have given Greenwood any kind of hurry up before reaching for a card. That sending off was unjustified. Several of the dissent bookings were a direct result of this. Hemp's second yellow was harsh, especially in view of the earlier foul on Hemp by Lawrence that left Hemp injured and should clearly have resulted in a yellow card for Lawrence.
@@kumiellis8374 I am not against Chelsea. As far as this match is concerned, I'm a neutral. And there is truth in what I'm saying. That's why the commentators thought the red card for Greenwood was wrong. That's why current and former players (and I don't mean Manchester City players) think the red card was wrong. That's why the press coverage has been highly critical of the referee. Turning to Lawrence, you can argue that it wasn't a yellow card but you then have to explain why other, pretty much identical incidents in other matches were.
I am a Chelsea fan and this ref should never be allowed to officiate at any WSL game. A ref shouldn't show any bias toward any team, and Greenwood's second yellow was a joke. The ref didn't give any hurry up gesture and Greenwood was looking where she could play the ball to retain possession. This should be talking about how good the game between two excellent teams was and not how poor the ref was
Ref was completely correct all teams were warned at the start of the season this would happen so was this let’s see just how far we can push the ref well that didn’t work did it
Exactly. Nothing controversial about the refereeing. This is happening in the men's game as well. The rules are new so in time this will non topic. Nicholas Jackson got six cards (one-game suspension) and all were for dissent.
One of the great matchups of the new season was destroyed by the Ref! When I was coaching we would from time to time get a ref like this and I would warn all my players that they must play very carefully.
You clearly do not understand the function of a referee. However, the idiotic changes made by FIFA/UEFA is confusing for ref's as well as players and spectators.
Lauren Hemp just made a mistake I thought the takle was allright myself but still one on my favourite women/lioness player though was still nice to see her play for abut in the pitch before she got sent off untill next time Lauren Hemp will look forward to seeing you on tv again soon in a match 😎👌⚽️🥅❤️
I mean... the foul ones are pretty much on the money. It's often said that when a ref hands out this many cards they've lost control of the match, so some of the disciplinarian ones (for objections, time stalling etc.) might have been solved by talking to the players and issue warnings, but on the whole, the ref got them right. The players also have to take responsibility for not losing control.
So what!?! - I think that all the issued Cards were correct. It just goes to show how competitive Womens' football has now become. Aggressive and perhaps increasingly 'violent'.... Well, consistent refereeing in this match.
There seems to be a mandate or look into approaching officiating in the Premier Lg, in reference to this particular referee. It will be interesting to see what is developing with other games & those officials. Good officiating & experienced referees will handle games much better & safer play. This officiating crew probably lost control of the game. Good officials will use voice to help control the game & rough play.
The ref, the most inadequate I have seen for a long, long time, is a total disgrace to the sport. Hopefully she will not be about to spoil any more games.
The F.A.'s purge on time-wasting is a road to hell in a hand-cart. Players can take the ball to the corner flag and shield the ball for as long as they can get away with it - used to be called unsporting behaviour - and goalkeepers can fall on the ball, kick it about before booting it upfield, yet taking 26-seconds to take a free-kick is against the rules. Madness!
Most of those were proper yellow cards. Ref did her job properly. When you are behind a player and take down your opponent by tripping or grabbing them it is in fact a yellow especially if it is close to the box.
I thought the ref did alright. It was the quality of the players that led to all those cards. If they timed their challenges better, there would be nothing for the ref to consider. And that is without mentioning the blatant professional fouls commited... If you can't play the game and keep chopping your opponent to pieces, that isn't the fault of the official noticing such bad play.
Dissent cards seem a bit too strict in the vid, as it didn't show players complaining that much. But it can just be the vid because it only shows when the cards were shown, not if that player kept arguing too many times or if they were previously warned. Honestly I don't anything controversial here.
This perfectly demonstrated all the ugly results of what happens in football when it's officiated by someone without any intention of applying common sense.
Idk, ref was legit. Only second yellow wasn't necessary, she could give just a warning. Red cards are gamechangers you have to be absolutely sure it's necessary! After all people are paying money to watch their performance, not yours
Poor little Robert doesn’t know the rules the players spoiled it by not following the rules which they choose not to follow and then argue with the ref.
The only controversial thing about this clip is the clickbait title. Now let her referee some male games. The refs there seem to think it's okay for players to shout and whine like babies.
Time to change Reffing or Red Card Procedure, no? (ie. Red means banned from next match, or after-match 'punishment')...? I'm a Sunderland supporter and a recent men's match was affected over 'words' the same way, so maybe Refs also need to grow 'thicker skin'?
As much as all of the cards are warranted, sometimes a ref has to let things pass to get a decent game, the more cards the less fun and entertaining it is. No hate to the ref but she could do with cheering up a bit 😅😂
@iaindw1 I'm not denying that, but I think having lack of consistency adds to the thrill of a game in a way!! (However I am extremely bias as Hemp is probably my fav player, so don't take too much of this to heart 😊😁🙃)
Players breaking rules and than complaining against cards is never not funny. Sorry but if you know the rules there is nothing to complain. Every card was justified. Sure the ref is strict but the ref is in charge not those arrogant players
You have to make refs do media now to explain their decisions. It will make refs make better decisions and soothe the minds of fans and players on choices that were made. It will help the refs credibility. So you won't have situation like this happening. Also wtf chelsea. They should have scored 5 goals.
As long as players come out and explain their decisions , how they missed an easy sitter they passed left instead of passing to the right why they kept passing to back four and then back four past each other. Gk explaining how they missed an easy save. It goes both ways
@iaindw1 They do. It's called a post game press conference, lol. The players get asked why they have bad games all the time from the press. However, refs aren't held accountable. So what was your point exactly?
post game press conference. lol. yeah right-every player that makes mistakes in games and many are game changing mistakes. thety all come out and are held accountable and explain their bad mistakes 😀@@stevieg5907
Somebody has yellow-carditis. Pulled down by the hair? Yup, that's a yellow. All the rest are just ladies falling over like they've been picked-off by a sniper in the stands. The ref was crap. Doesn't she know that a team can only field a minimum of 7 players? If she keeps sending players off, and get to 6, they'd have to abandon the game.
You get a card. You get a card. Everyone gets a card!!! Wtf 😅
It's a bit like Gordon Ramsey Hell's Kitchen: You, You, You, You, You, get the fuck out of here
Note to the editor: The word is "dissent", not "descent".
well it was some descent fouls 🙃
@@budoshi-f2l - trying to be clever you made two mistakes illustrating greater illiteracy. You meant to say "decent" rather than "descent", and since fouls is plural you need to correct both your pronoun and verb: "Well they were some decent fouls".
so that's why i was a bit confused
Quality ref all decisions right
It s the only way players understand
if you play like that you deserve what comes to you
The timewasting one was a bit harsh in my opinion, it took5 sec in the video (we dont see when did she started that tho) . All the others were completly deserved, yeah.
I’m sorry but why did greenwood get sent off like wtf?!?!
Got a second yellow for time wasting.
@@DoubleWavedYellows Which isn't a yellow card according to official soccer rules.
Solid reffing enforcing the laws of the game correctly. Good on her.
Most of them not deserv a card how some one waste time in the start of the match 😂
@@al3nzi5ald32 she went by the book, 100% Correct calls
i thought the ref was warranted in all her decisions
After the red card, Mancity should have played quickly to score while Chelsea gathered around the coach. If we are all against wasting time))
Assemblies on the pitch should not be allowed, mainly after scoring a goal I don't know why every one is invited to attend a scoring event (both in men's and women's matches). Even substitue players enter the field which is punishable if the rules are correctly aplied (No one can enter or leave the pitch without consulting the ref.
In addition the "six" second rule that keepers have to follow are seldomly applied.
The entire function of a ref should be revised by the FIFA. Watch a field hockey game to get an idea. No protests there and the ball is brought immediately in play after a ref 's decision.
Wating for a signal of the ref before a free kick can be taken is ridiculous.
@@Rinus-et6qs
When stopped with a whistle, restart with a whistle
Opponent has to place himself 5m off the ball
Ref needs the time to replace himself
There is a difference between direct and indirect free kick
Advantage can play a role in an indirect free kick, the player taking the kick has to mark, or point at the ball, with his hand or his feet
@@deepdivedelight Your description of an indirect or free kick is somewhat confusing to me. In the rules book of FIFA there is no indication that a ref has to signal to continue the game but I do not reed the rules book every month or so. Anyay, I think it makes the match faster.
@@Rinus-et6qs I don't have my FIFA-USSF book handy, but I can assure that if he stopped the game with a whistle, he must restart it with a whistle. He any case, the referee can't stop the game without using his whistle.
They are supposed to carry two, in case they lose one during the game.
The referee was right all the time. Perfect refereing
If anybody actually read the rule book of football that referee played the best game she could she stuck to the rule book good one 🙏🏻
Every card that was given during that match, was 100% correct. Complaining against the ref = yellow card, timewasting = yellow card,... People who play football should learn that the ref in always in charge, and not the other way arround... I'm suprised the ref didn't show more yellow or red cards during that match, seeing how many times she was surrounded by players complaing about her descissions...
I do fully agree with your vision of the game and refs.
she got a red card for time wasting
this is completley wrong
your wrong
@@abbielester5419 The red came because the player had already received a yellow earlier in the match. The time wasting offense was a second yellow, and upon receiving two yellows in the same match, the player also receives a red and is disqualified out of the game. Hope that clears up your confusion some.
@@abbielester5419actually, she got a yellow card for delaying the restart, she just had a yellow already. The rule is simple, she shouldve seen it coming
There something called nuance. Not everything has to be by the book. If such fouls were given cards in the men's game, the match wouldn't even last more than 20mins
Sorry. Great ref. All those decisions looked correct in the context shown here.
Dissent, really the issue is with the player/s, unfair to blame the referee.
Does anyone think those decisions were wrong???
Totally agree.
Ref was good
Jelena Cankovic yellow card at 98' so 12 cards in total 💀
Gareth Taylor although not a player also got booked
Think she was a Chelsea fan
I don't think there was any Man City player that didn't get booked
All refs should be as severe as this one. Rules are rules. There was not a single disputable card here. All of them correct, warranted and dished out like the boss that this ref is.
Greenwood took 26 seconds to take a damn free kick. If you waste time, you get booked. All the comments are emotionally charged ones from her 'England' teammates and friends from the National set up. It's a yellow card and she was already on a yellow. So that's red
Every one a valid booking. Some players think that, because they are international players, they can show DESCENT(comical). As though the rules don't apply to them. Most too thick to accept that when on a yellow, you have to be careful.
Looks like you are too weak to play football 😅
Best ref I have seen in a womens game so far.
what was the controversy? were they not bookings?
Teams don't generally start timewasting after just 35 minutes, it isn't clear Greenwood was timewasting and the referee does not appear to have given Greenwood any kind of hurry up before reaching for a card. That sending off was unjustified. Several of the dissent bookings were a direct result of this. Hemp's second yellow was harsh, especially in view of the earlier foul on Hemp by Lawrence that left Hemp injured and should clearly have resulted in a yellow card for Lawrence.
Clearly you are against Chelsea that justifies your explanation cause there’s no truth in what you saying
In some cases, probably not. Moreover, the ref was inconsistent and seemed to have a chip on her shoulder.
@@kumiellis8374 I am not against Chelsea. As far as this match is concerned, I'm a neutral. And there is truth in what I'm saying. That's why the commentators thought the red card for Greenwood was wrong. That's why current and former players (and I don't mean Manchester City players) think the red card was wrong. That's why the press coverage has been highly critical of the referee. Turning to Lawrence, you can argue that it wasn't a yellow card but you then have to explain why other, pretty much identical incidents in other matches were.
I am a Chelsea fan and this ref should never be allowed to officiate at any WSL game. A ref shouldn't show any bias toward any team, and Greenwood's second yellow was a joke. The ref didn't give any hurry up gesture and Greenwood was looking where she could play the ball to retain possession.
This should be talking about how good the game between two excellent teams was and not how poor the ref was
Enough rubbish spoken about this!
It does NOT take 26 seconds to take a free kick in your own half!, & whining about it after warnings is simply nuts!
Apart from the time wasting one, I actually agree with most cards
All standard calls.
Ref was completely correct all teams were warned at the start of the season this would happen so was this let’s see just how far we can push the ref well that didn’t work did it
Exactly. Nothing controversial about the refereeing. This is happening in the men's game as well. The rules are new so in time this will non topic. Nicholas Jackson got six cards (one-game suspension) and all were for dissent.
@souixds
Dissent should be allowed in football. The players are not robots.
Cards should only come out if Dissent gets out of hand.
Players need to be more respectful… well played that referee for punishing cheats
I agree.
And keep your mouths shut!
One of the great matchups of the new season was destroyed by the Ref! When I was coaching we would from time to time get a ref like this and I would warn all my players that they must play very carefully.
You clearly do not understand the function of a referee. However, the idiotic changes made by FIFA/UEFA is confusing for ref's as well as players and spectators.
No the ref did her job
The referee broke the match
Idiot the players did, learn the rules but you would have to have functioning brain activity for that to happen, sadly that rules you out.
Lauren Hemp just made a mistake I thought the takle was allright myself but still one on my favourite women/lioness player though was still nice to see her play for abut in the pitch before she got sent off untill next time Lauren Hemp will look forward to seeing you on tv again soon in a match 😎👌⚽️🥅❤️
She got one before for kicking off at ref
@MD-mo4vi yea I know did watch the match still a ace player she is though like last week she scored twice for man city
Yellow for descent...when jumping gets you in trouble, football becomes hard.
Made me laugh as well. Dissent. Descent. Probably sounds the same to non English speakers.
@@glseibert0825 Or maybe it's just like Trump, who thinks he's an "unpresidented" success in everything.
I mean... the foul ones are pretty much on the money. It's often said that when a ref hands out this many cards they've lost control of the match, so some of the disciplinarian ones (for objections, time stalling etc.) might have been solved by talking to the players and issue warnings, but on the whole, the ref got them right. The players also have to take responsibility for not losing control.
The ref is correct, the players should play the beautiful game not impede...it should flow ⚽.
So what!?! - I think that all the issued Cards were correct. It just goes to show how competitive Womens' football has now become. Aggressive and perhaps increasingly 'violent'.... Well, consistent refereeing in this match.
This referee is a disgrace to the WSL.
I agree the Lauren James wasn’t even a red card.
@@eleanorsmith155idiot.
Exactly as you say ! I felt the same way as you, so I couldn't help but exclaim, " Why is that ? "@@eleanorsmith155
@@eleanorsmith155It was Hemp’s second yellow card. She got one earlier for screaming her head off at the referee. She can’t have any complaints.
One dodgy decision, the rest were perfect. Good refereeing
nothing controversial about the reffing. This is just a title fishing for viewers, and its working!
What is descent? What kind of foul is that?
It's when you go down, at a guess |-)
It's when you go down,and moan about it.
Her Man City teammates are just protecting her but then they give a yellow LIKE WHAT?!!!
There seems to be a mandate or look into approaching officiating in the Premier Lg, in reference to this particular referee. It will be interesting to see what is developing with other games & those officials. Good officiating & experienced referees will handle games much better & safer play. This officiating crew probably lost control of the game. Good officials will use voice to help control the game & rough play.
Soccer, men and womens, need to reel in their players and the disrespect they give officials.
The ref, the most inadequate I have seen for a long, long time, is a total disgrace to the sport. Hopefully she will not be about to spoil any more games.
I agree, the last thing we need in the women's game is a referee that makes correct decisions
The referee's decision was right all the time, Those fouls deserves a caution.
This game was crazy
Still waiting for the Controversial bit, is that in part 2??????
The F.A.'s purge on time-wasting is a road to hell in a hand-cart. Players can take the ball to the corner flag and shield the ball for as long as they can get away with it - used to be called unsporting behaviour - and goalkeepers can fall on the ball, kick it about before booting it upfield, yet taking 26-seconds to take a free-kick is against the rules. Madness!
Most of those were proper yellow cards. Ref did her job properly. When you are behind a player and take down your opponent by tripping or grabbing them it is in fact a yellow especially if it is close to the box.
I thought the ref did alright. It was the quality of the players that led to all those cards. If they timed their challenges better, there would be nothing for the ref to consider. And that is without mentioning the blatant professional fouls commited...
If you can't play the game and keep chopping your opponent to pieces, that isn't the fault of the official noticing such bad play.
Not the ref's fault they commit that many fouls. Calling less fouls just because it would be "too many" doesn't make any sense. See a foul? Call it!
Dissent cards seem a bit too strict in the vid, as it didn't show players complaining that much. But it can just be the vid because it only shows when the cards were shown, not if that player kept arguing too many times or if they were previously warned. Honestly I don't anything controversial here.
Who won the match?
They were all cards what's the issue?
This perfectly demonstrated all the ugly results of what happens in football when it's officiated by someone without any intention of applying common sense.
115 charges and still cant compete in the womens game
The first one was a foul not a yellow card . Set a bad precedent
What the f does "descent" mean???
It's DISSENT!
I've seen waaaay worse than this, this is nowhere near controversial.
This is American sports when the referees actually call the fouls. Good on them.
Woman always right. Don't argue. Yes reff, that was correct
Every yellow was justified except 3 according to the rules.
Its not that bad reffing, did see much worse reffing during this all male European cup.
Those women gotta learn they gotta respek the wahman
lol didnt know women's football game can get physical like that
Idk, ref was legit. Only second yellow wasn't necessary, she could give just a warning. Red cards are gamechangers you have to be absolutely sure it's necessary! After all people are paying money to watch their performance, not yours
I did not see nothing controversial, all cards were on point!
Another example of the FA fast tracking female referees who have no idea how the game of football is played other than learning in a classroom.
Dissent is spelt wrong
ITS THE REF WHO SPOIL THE GAME
I agree
Poor little Robert doesn’t know the rules the players spoiled it by not following the rules which they choose not to follow and then argue with the ref.
@@eleanorsmith155idiot learn the rules all the cards were justified 🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@kenspedding4594you make me laugh
Do you post on inta? ❤
? The referee got all these spot on
a parte, l'espulsione per la perdita di tempo (che non ho mai visto), gli altri cartellini gialli sono tutti ampiamente meritati
James Is A Very Dirty Player She Uses Her Strength To Bully Players 👎👎👎👎👎
"Dissent, "not "descent"
Why i cant take this serious., toddlers.
WTF HEMP DIDNT EVE CAUSE THE OTHER PERSON TO FALL OVER IAND IT A YELLOWWWWWWWWW
she should referee brazil.. she would get busy. 😆
I don't see much of a problem here
I like this referee..... she's dangerous. : )
Worst ref in history
She was totally on something terrible ref 👎🏼
Afraid you’re wrong and proves you don’t know anything learn the rules sweetie or grow a spine and try reffing one yourself.
The time wasting one maybe a little harsh but other than that all the cards were well deserved. So, where is the controversy?
Why is this controversial????????????
city should be win,thanks for that refeere save Chelsea from losing
The only controversial thing about this clip is the clickbait title. Now let her referee some male games. The refs there seem to think it's okay for players to shout and whine like babies.
Terrible, terrible referee horrible!
Rip if you saw that game
Time to change Reffing or Red Card Procedure, no? (ie. Red means banned from next match, or after-match 'punishment')...?
I'm a Sunderland supporter and a recent men's match was affected over 'words' the same way, so maybe Refs also need to grow 'thicker skin'?
majority were justified.
Javier Castrilli ( but woman)
Son muy pocas las amarillas inexistentes
As much as all of the cards are warranted, sometimes a ref has to let things pass to get a decent game, the more cards the less fun and entertaining it is. No hate to the ref but she could do with cheering up a bit 😅😂
but fans want consistency dont they . they got it this game
@iaindw1 I'm not denying that, but I think having lack of consistency adds to the thrill of a game in a way!!
(However I am extremely bias as Hemp is probably my fav player, so don't take too much of this to heart 😊😁🙃)
The Ref was right.
very good ref lady 🥰
Players breaking rules and than complaining against cards is never not funny. Sorry but if you know the rules there is nothing to complain. Every card was justified. Sure the ref is strict but the ref is in charge not those arrogant players
What controversial?
Ref definitely was on her period
Big Boss syndrome awful Ref.
Action should be taken against this ref What a disgrace
She was axed from refereeing a WSL today and Sunday
Alex Greenwood 100 cap is early game over 😅
The ref was a little Hitler on a power trip. Ruins the WSL.
You have to make refs do media now to explain their decisions. It will make refs make better decisions and soothe the minds of fans and players on choices that were made. It will help the refs credibility. So you won't have situation like this happening. Also wtf chelsea. They should have scored 5 goals.
Chelsea got scare by the ref 😂
As long as players come out and explain their decisions , how they missed an easy sitter they passed left instead of passing to the right why they kept passing to back four and then back four past each other. Gk explaining how they missed an easy save. It goes both ways
@iaindw1 They do. It's called a post game press conference, lol. The players get asked why they have bad games all the time from the press. However, refs aren't held accountable. So what was your point exactly?
post game press conference. lol. yeah right-every player that makes mistakes in games and many are game changing mistakes. thety all come out and are held accountable and explain their bad mistakes 😀@@stevieg5907
I don't see the controversy, all cards were deserving. If the players played soccer instead of slapfuck there wouldnt be any issues.
What's soccer?
Whoever paid off the referee should get a refund. Cos chelsea still didnt win
Somebody has yellow-carditis. Pulled down by the hair? Yup, that's a yellow. All the rest are just ladies falling over like they've been picked-off by a sniper in the stands. The ref was crap. Doesn't she know that a team can only field a minimum of 7 players? If she keeps sending players off, and get to 6, they'd have to abandon the game.