Uncle Slavoj's guide to telling a joke: Repeatedly announce that you are about to tell joke. Give brief summary of the nationality/ethnicity/religion of the person who told you this joke Tell first 30 seconds of joke Pause to explain key information required to understand joke Return to joke. Bury punchline in lengthy ramble Immediately begin exploring philosophical ramifications of joke. That's why we love him
For all it's faults the internet has allowed someone like myself, with a very poor educational background, to listen and learn from this important thinker! Thank you OxfordUnion!
Slavoj would reply with a lengthy explanation on why the stand-up comedian is seen as an intellectual authority and purveyor of ideology in the United States... and make you laugh while he does it
I'm Slovenian, I lived next door to Slavoj for a few years back in my studying years and had an honor to talk to him couple of times. He's certainly is one of the most famous contemporary Slovenians and a great promoter of Slovenia (next to Melania trump lol) and I'm proud of him. He tells it like it is...
I find it incredibly interesting how he can go off tangent and at the end of his ramblings somehow arrives at the initial question or the point he was trying to make... it is like travelling from A to B via a map and then deciding to think you know better and take a shortcut, only that this supposed shortcut takes you through roads you haven't even seen on the map and you end up arriving later at your destination, but have seen some incredible interesting things on the way.
for me this is philosophy in a traditional sense, take a point and start drawinf extending and contracting circles around it. many viewpoints of the same point.
He was right too, there was no trigger warning for any of the things he said. If anyone is triggered by what he said then maybe they should stay home next time, no one wants them around.
Yeah, I mean, it wasn’t like he went into the kind of detail that needed trigger warnings. Now, if he was going to get into some extreme details that went beyond the joke, like say for whatever reason he was to go into the brutal rape of women in concentration camps in any kind of detail, then I would understand him seriously issuing a trigger warning (though the thought of him seriously doing so is comical to me, I almost can’t take it seriously). Point being, trigger warnings are fine to use in certain contexts, maybe even very appropriate to use in some contexts, but even outside of the silly, right wing, stereotypical joke on trigger warnings, there are some people in some spaces that do go overboard with the concept and/or their usage... As someone with PTSD, who knows very well what it’s like to literally be triggered, and to immediately go into a state of hyper anxiety, panic and often flashbacks to the trauma that caused the PTSD, and all of this something that you can’t just stop from happening once the stimulus has been perceived, I can tell you that being triggered in this clinical sense is pretty fucking awful, and unfortunately I wasn’t able (or perhaps willing) to understand the purpose and point of trigger warnings until I experienced severely traumatic circumstances that led to PTSD, and then experienced what it’s actually like to be triggered in a variety of circumstances. The entire project of being considerate of people who have this problem, which is what a trigger warning is actually for, is incredibly admirable imo, and I can say from experience that said warning, *and being able to at least anticipate said stimulus, as opposed to being surprised/caught off guard, does actually make a difference.* That said, this considerate move on the part of certain good faith actors has, imo, been taken to an extreme in certain cases, and/or (more specifically) has lead to some unrealistic expectations from sometimes unreasonable people (usually students), as if trigger warnings, or content warnings, can or should be universally accepted, applied, etc, and unfortunately this has (imo) lead to some problematic behaviors, and so on.. Trigger warnings are a tool, and they have a specific purpose, but their use is limited for a wide variety of reasons, and anyone acting in good faith accepts this, and is reasonable about it. Anyway, I’ve a feeling everyone who’s commented in this thread upto this point likely agrees with what I’m saying, and/or has heard all this before, and likely, generally, share my views on this bc we likely, generally, overlap in sociopolitical outlook. I’m speaking for someone who may come across this thread, perhaps someone more right leaning, or generally opposed to the concept of trigger warnings/content warnings, or maybe even a JBP fan who’s exploring Zižek, post-April’19 debate, etc, and so on.. I’m more interested in offering up an actual nuanced and reasonable view of the concept, and why it’s not simply nonsensical or coddling, while still admitting that any honest look at their use, especially in certain university contexts, has been wrought with some problematic attitudes and behaviors. There will always be bad faith, and/or confused, and/or irrational, and/or mistaken people who ruin good things, and/or misuse them, and so on. That’s never been any reason to throw out the baby with the bath water, is the point. So if you’re reading this and you’re the type who’s generally against trigger warnings, take a step back and consider the actual utility, value, and intention in actually using them as a tool for folks with PTSD in certain contexts where some rather serious issue is being explored. I’m not saying you should accept the ridiculous use, overuse, etc, or even that you should accept their use at all; I’m saying you should consider the nuances, and maybe attempt to sympathize or empathize with someone who actually has PTSD (as opposed to a “snowflake”, or whatever). Cheers ❤️🏴♾
I’m always staggered by how someone can express themselves with such nuance and adept articulation in a second language. Incredible. Also clearly an original, intelligent and charismatic man. Great watch
@@Horus... Don't be so patronizing. Language connects cultures and it's always amazing to see someone being such an eloquent speaker in a foreign language. It's a sign of respect, and a compliment to the culture the language has cultivated, that the foreigner is willing to learn and speak the language to a level most natives can't even compare to.
Google made me do it you’re right in that my previous comment was not the nicest, it was obnoxious, which is why I deleted it. however, it’s unnecessary to put the action of speaking a foreign language in terms of respect, otherwise it will bring out the issue of valuation thereby making the whole contrasting situation inevitably patronising, in other words, you cannot speak about respect without having pre-established precepts of what is respectable and why it is respectable.
Google made me do it The flattery point it’s totally understandable, I’m almost touched by it.(no sarcasm). The thing is if you deal with this matter in terms of respect, you fall down the rabbit hole of patronising. Simply because speaking English is something of a mandate, as it is with any lingua Franca, people “have to” speak English as they would speak Mandarin should things turn around in the International balance of power. I mean, you do your best with the hand you’re dealt, it doesn’t mean the House has any respect whatsoever, so long as they keep coming, “the House always wins”, they just watch in contempt.
For me, he makes many a great point, but all of us make statements that could be considered BS, especially people who are involved in, and in front of the public, and doing public speaking. There's certain things and/or attitudes I disagree with but I primarily enjoy his mind and appreciate his thinking because it provocates me and tickles the sociological bone
@John Swift your narrow mind perceives what he says as 'bullshit' because you struggle to conduct critical thinking for yourself, perhaps because you are scared to accept what he says has a lot of bearing and truth to it.
This is why I don't have an ethical problem with using adblockers. If you want to support Zizek (or someone with a TH-cam channel), buy their books/products or donate money to them.
View it as a test or rather price of the knowledge right like you're paying the knowledges worth with patience which is hardly a price for that what is priceless
He always comes out with something new for me to think about. He's a good salesman really when he touches on something i want to know more about then cuts it short and encourages you to buy his book.
He made several good and pointed at the problems we are facing as a society. I've read his book and he try to explain things with unique perspective. Really a brilliant man
OMG such a definition for Christianity's atheism, that it made me understand my own recent atheism. "The secret core of Christianity is precisely this acceptance of being on your own as a divine gift. What's the Christian's answer when you feel alone, abandoned by God, just depending on yourself? The message is that this is God's gift to you, this is the freedom that God gave us". wow
I feel like the proper ending to the Auschwitz joke would've been better if it was: Jewish man throws his arm over God patronizingly and says, "Don't worry, you had to be there to really get it"
He is undoubtedly a genius. This does not affirm everything he says to be true, and does not limit anyone's freedom to disagree with his interpretation of philosophical works and ideas. But he undoutedly is a genius.
@Ev MIles you really don't understand him , he said Hitler etc were not violent in terms of the radical change they brought, not actual violence , he said that the terminology he uses means that Ghandi was more violent and better In his terms than Hitler , you simply don't understand him . He answered this in an interview
@@seankelly378 he didnt say that for the physical violence that happened. But he means violently changing the structure of the state. Ghandi was more violent in this way.
@@armwrestlingfan6804 Having read a few of his books and listening to his ideas I am not worried about his popularity brother! People who have nothing worthy need memes to become famous
The joke is that the people he's addressing are from Oxford and will eventually go on to become the next 1% at the top of society. He's literally down-sizing the society the students attending are about to have the most influence on. He's pissing in their pond!
@@DarkAngelEU That's kind of my point. We measure shit in relation to ourselves and have the arrogance to think we know anything about anything. You want analyzation? From a fixed, biased perspective of an organism that fucks, eats and shits? And you think it's going to be accurate? I personally think we put shit in boxes to make ourselves feel better about how small we really are. Let me ask you something. Have you ever thrown a football? Did you have to do the insane calculations that it would take for your body to be able to act in accordance to propel such an object? Angle, velocity, how much muscle performance is needed for the exact distance and height of the throw? Or did you just feel it out?
Slajov is my favorite lunatic. I have no idea what he's talking about but he's a trip to watch and tells good jokes. I only wish I was smart enough to understand his lectures lol.
I respect people who are in this position. It’s like when you see an obese person running laps. They’re at the early stages. You don’t need to go to school to understand this stuff.
My hope is some other animator does Slavoj before South Park, ultimately I want to see South Park do him. He is close to being a cartoon, simply using his own face. Great character and intellect.
@@agnesbajka6784 Zizek would respond by saying "Don't patronize me and so on. I am well aware that I am filthy and sniff a lot and so on and so forth but I simply - to put it bluntly - don't care!" And then he would relate this topic to some observation of pop-culture and how it is misunderstood because of hegemonic ideology, etc etc etc.
I heard the paradise joke on a previous talk of his via Podcast and he didn't try to explain it. So the delivery was 10 times better. I laughed so loud my housemates thought something was wrong.
He is an immensely articulated person despite of being Fidgety and having some nasal allergy. 😝😅😁 He apologises everytime for diverting away from topic too. Love Him💋
There's nothing brilliant about jumping back and forth on your ideas so that you contradict yourself and no one can consistently evaluate your stance. A person should have the integrity and courage to stand by one's ideas and not support contradictory ones.
I speak a Slavic language, so it's easy for me to understand him even with his accent. But I've always wondered how much can you native English speakers understand him. Do you have to really TRY to understand him or is it as easy to understand him as someone who has a perfect natural English accent?
You know, you go through some stages, add up some stuff, and when you get back together with your fellas you tell them about what you've accumulated so far. But then your accumulation starts to die away as you tell them all. And now you gotta go fill it again with new ideas and SO ON. I'd like to listen to this man, in person, until the very point where his ends, which may be impossible yet, would only be, all the more fun.
He's onto the key issues with identity politics and maybe the grand issues with society, a smart man but tough to follow with his tick. I hope he gets a bigger stage to talk and debate but ofc only if as his says, "the big media" lets him. As an after thought he really is a tsunami of ideas, leaves you lost in a dozen questions, love it!
@@christiangeiselmann didn't know that, have followed much of his work as it appears in english. Will dig a little and see what else he's upto. I really must get his new book.
Jess Montgomery The pieces in German newspapers (appearing usually in the feuilleton section, i.e. where culture, arts and intellectual debate have their place) are translated by somebody, I suppose. Although perhaps, as a Slovenian, he may also know German.
5:15 "through this self humiliating gestures, they assert their universality". Aka: by humiliating myself I get to dictate to others how to behave, what to say, what to think. Not a bad tradeoff...
5 years ago I did not know Zizeg! I’ve only got to know about him in 2024 . What treat! Im new Philosophy at age of 51 and im now reading my wives Nietzsche.
"Religion is the opium of the people..." is a misunderstanding of the original quote. The full quote from Karl Marx translates as: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people". Often quoted only in part, the interpretation of the metaphor in its context has received much less attention. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_of_the_people
You also need to consider it had the reputation of Marijuana back then as well. All the best western writers used it to "clear their minds," from Poe to Jules Verne to Conan Doyle to Sartre, in Marx' circles opium was at least a useful tool in a philosopher or writers repertoire
Professor was brave enough to bring listeners to some points where patronage and mentoring questions are rises. He mentioned that in the narrow circles Slovenian officials are less anti immigrants than on public. That means he calls to admits that immigrants problem is come up not as he likes to call it "the discrete" event, but a sequence of tries to change the Middle East and North Africa. And by populists claiming that post-communists and other regimes which dominated in Middle East and Africa served challengers to start let's call them "active supporting actions" towards changing those regimes the same populists have to recognise main reason-consequence chain which brought West Europe to the flood of immigrants. 2. I will be impressed and delighted if Oxford Union in a week time will not remove this presentation for accusations in racism.
Just found him, great satirist on serious complex issues, full of knowledge and wisdom, honest and unaffected, 'cuts through the crap', original and charismatic, good communication between Interviewer and Slavoj, open to new information, incredible clarity and articulation as an ESL, natural comic style. He is a breath of fresh air from the fake 24/7 Corporate Media's Glamorous News Anchors and their Guests with their superficial politeness of 'Excuse Me' and 'You're Welcome' which is annoying, time-consuming and a weaponized language. Do you think Jesus looked politically correct among those Sand-Dunes. I wonder if those people commented on his looks or chose to listen to his message. I wonder how they ate the 'Bread and Fish' under those conditions. Today, we sanitize our body and our environment with pharma-products while our health is going down-hill. It is obvious Slavoj has some condition and we need to get past it to listen to the content of his talk.
Exactly. Aura Borealis has clearly not read Strunk’s Elements of Style! The lack of rhetorical restraint on a Zizek video is offensive!!! Good for you letting this person know how stupid they sound three years later. May Cicero guide Aura to terse banality.
@Chodex I'm not sure who are the intolerant liberals that you are worried about. If they are young people then they are very silly. That generalization that liberals are the most intolerant is not true. Christian Nationalists are quite intolerant as well. But these are distractions from the existential threats facing humanity. Cunning people create chaos to have more access to power whatever label they have assumed. I like Zizek because he is very kind, pleasant, funny although he is often proclaiming how hated and horrible he is.
@Chodex I am not upset. If you are not upset about the liberals the why are you complaining so much? Don’t try to project your feelings of anger, fear, and rage on me. Please stroke your own hair first.
This man has always been a true master at marrying a strong, thought-provoking real world concept with a somtimes shocking, provocative and hilarious joke.
@@retiredshitposter1062 The video was the exact opposite of your lame strawman summary void of truth. Even in this video he is constantly critiquing authoritarian leftist regimes and making jokes like how the proper Q&A in stalinist russia would have the questions distributed by the state party, etc etc
@@retiredshitposter1062 your comment is a shining example of what happens when one makes an assessment of a particular thing without engaging with the thing itself. it's nice that you're upfront about not having watched any footage, but even if you hadn't made it clear, your commentary would have as your summation is woefully inaccurate. Given your username, it would seem you might be good at infiltrating echo chambers, but not escaping them. It seems clear to me that your speech is in tune with the speech of countless others that regurgitate nonsense.
@@retiredshitposter1062 funny thet you use the term cringey, as if what you feel about something would tell you any reality about the thing. This is philosophic talk mate, if you are going to listen, weep your load at home beforehand
It's really hard to keep track of what he is saying, especially because he talks about really complex things. Anyway, I'm eager to see him debating Dr. Peterson next month
@@duncangriffiths4399 how was this in any way productive? both argued from differend points and cryed a bit how mean the left is. only "productive" thing was that now everybody knows that peterson has no clue what so ever when he is talking about post modernism and or marxism. and if you didnt saw that, well maby you should read your own comment - the last line again ;)
I want to jus say that I am Orthodox Christian and a bishop at my church was explaining his reason for believing in God in this way "One cannot say he does not believe in God when he believes in miracles. That I speak and that you understand what I have said. That you speak and I understand what you said. This is a miracle." I just want to say that Slavoj does not disappoint as a Christian atheist. He is as good as the well-read theologians. He understands religion in a way Christopher Hitchens and the flock never could, however many bible verses they memorized.
5:50 in my mother tongue language (which is Mizo) we have a term for what you are saying, when a person acts that way, "inngaitlawm chapo" basically meaning: prideful humility/humblenes. This would be a literal translation.
Very captivating. The man's amount of knowledge is stunning. Also. You olny can make so many runny nose jokes till they get old.. Did you try actually listening to him?
Uncle Slavoj's guide to telling a joke:
Repeatedly announce that you are about to tell joke.
Give brief summary of the nationality/ethnicity/religion of the person who told you this joke
Tell first 30 seconds of joke
Pause to explain key information required to understand joke
Return to joke. Bury punchline in lengthy ramble
Immediately begin exploring philosophical ramifications of joke.
That's why we love him
Best comment
And yet they're still hilarious
his entire train of thought is philosophical, he's like the opposite of me, he thinks about every word that comes out of his mouth
love this xo : )
Thanks kind human for this good comment that I am reading in 2023.
For all it's faults the internet has allowed someone like myself, with a very poor educational background, to listen and learn from this important thinker! Thank you OxfordUnion!
Amen !
I liked but ultimately unliked. The internet doesn't have any faults
Jordan Peterson is about to rip him to shreds.
@@milaik2194 . where? nvm. april 19th, toronto, sony center
@@milaik2194 didnt work so well lol
Nobody at all:
Slavoj Žižek: "I want to begin with two Jewish jokes..."
they were good jokes!
20 minutes later
Here's the second joke
nobody jokes so funny
Jared Williams have you heard about the tourette’s syndrome
If that happened in Soviet union, he would go to Gulag
this is the weirdest standup set I've ever seen
wyd communist daffy duck is the best
zizek is the jokerified standup comedian. he tells a short joke then spends 30 minutes explaining it in intricate detail
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Zizek is a brilliant standup.
Slavoj would reply with a lengthy explanation on why the stand-up comedian is seen as an intellectual authority and purveyor of ideology in the United States... and make you laugh while he does it
I'm Slovenian, I lived next door to Slavoj for a few years back in my studying years and had an honor to talk to him couple of times. He's certainly is one of the most famous contemporary Slovenians and a great promoter of Slovenia (next to Melania trump lol) and I'm proud of him. He tells it like it is...
Melania Trump xDDDD
Melania has some nice pocs 👍
kje si pa živel?
Luka Doncic gonna be next
tvoja mama
He's a smart fella, but you wouldn't want him to make you a sandwich
This is literally the funniest thing i've read in a long time
@@peraxelhagne1400 agreed lol
Thandwich or a thalad
Sorry what's smart about him except pretending to be a "genius".
@@capitosinora Why don't you just pretend to have a sense of humour? LOL
"I'm not saying ordinary people are stupid, intellectuals are not. They are also."
Gotta love this guy 😂😂
He's great, isn't he?
Better if he said " We are also"
@@kerobzcyn488 I don't think that would be better.
facts..
@@JK-mx3go nah it wouldn't have you're right they separates out the the we because he realizes that he doesn't belong in that bunch lmaoo
I'm addicted to listening to this man. 4-min news channel snippets to hours long free-wheeling talks. Anything. Just give me my dose of Zizek.
@Anon so you go about seeking admirers of Zizek in TH-cam comments only to tell them they're 'poisoning themselves'? How did you even get here?
@Anon thanks for your concern. Hope your path shows you the light you seek.
@Anon there is light at the end of your mom's tunnel
@Anon cmon, your mom ain't that bad
@Anon 🤣not a very good argument but ok , he's one of the most decorated philosophers of the modern era
I find it incredibly interesting how he can go off tangent and at the end of his ramblings somehow arrives at the initial question or the point he was trying to make... it is like travelling from A to B via a map and then deciding to think you know better and take a shortcut, only that this supposed shortcut takes you through roads you haven't even seen on the map and you end up arriving later at your destination, but have seen some incredible interesting things on the way.
for me this is philosophy in a traditional sense, take a point and start drawinf extending and contracting circles around it. many viewpoints of the same point.
This is exactly how I love to travel the shelves of libraries.
Reminded me of Trump's signature "weave" lol
Zizek going to a British university and saying no trigger warning needed and then making a holocaust joke XD
He was right too, there was no trigger warning for any of the things he said. If anyone is triggered by what he said then maybe they should stay home next time, no one wants them around.
Yeah, I mean, it wasn’t like he went into the kind of detail that needed trigger warnings. Now, if he was going to get into some extreme details that went beyond the joke, like say for whatever reason he was to go into the brutal rape of women in concentration camps in any kind of detail, then I would understand him seriously issuing a trigger warning (though the thought of him seriously doing so is comical to me, I almost can’t take it seriously). Point being, trigger warnings are fine to use in certain contexts, maybe even very appropriate to use in some contexts, but even outside of the silly, right wing, stereotypical joke on trigger warnings, there are some people in some spaces that do go overboard with the concept and/or their usage...
As someone with PTSD, who knows very well what it’s like to literally be triggered, and to immediately go into a state of hyper anxiety, panic and often flashbacks to the trauma that caused the PTSD, and all of this something that you can’t just stop from happening once the stimulus has been perceived, I can tell you that being triggered in this clinical sense is pretty fucking awful, and unfortunately I wasn’t able (or perhaps willing) to understand the purpose and point of trigger warnings until I experienced severely traumatic circumstances that led to PTSD, and then experienced what it’s actually like to be triggered in a variety of circumstances. The entire project of being considerate of people who have this problem, which is what a trigger warning is actually for, is incredibly admirable imo, and I can say from experience that said warning, *and being able to at least anticipate said stimulus, as opposed to being surprised/caught off guard, does actually make a difference.* That said, this considerate move on the part of certain good faith actors has, imo, been taken to an extreme in certain cases, and/or (more specifically) has lead to some unrealistic expectations from sometimes unreasonable people (usually students), as if trigger warnings, or content warnings, can or should be universally accepted, applied, etc, and unfortunately this has (imo) lead to some problematic behaviors, and so on.. Trigger warnings are a tool, and they have a specific purpose, but their use is limited for a wide variety of reasons, and anyone acting in good faith accepts this, and is reasonable about it.
Anyway, I’ve a feeling everyone who’s commented in this thread upto this point likely agrees with what I’m saying, and/or has heard all this before, and likely, generally, share my views on this bc we likely, generally, overlap in sociopolitical outlook. I’m speaking for someone who may come across this thread, perhaps someone more right leaning, or generally opposed to the concept of trigger warnings/content warnings, or maybe even a JBP fan who’s exploring Zižek, post-April’19 debate, etc, and so on.. I’m more interested in offering up an actual nuanced and reasonable view of the concept, and why it’s not simply nonsensical or coddling, while still admitting that any honest look at their use, especially in certain university contexts, has been wrought with some problematic attitudes and behaviors.
There will always be bad faith, and/or confused, and/or irrational, and/or mistaken people who ruin good things, and/or misuse them, and so on. That’s never been any reason to throw out the baby with the bath water, is the point. So if you’re reading this and you’re the type who’s generally against trigger warnings, take a step back and consider the actual utility, value, and intention in actually using them as a tool for folks with PTSD in certain contexts where some rather serious issue is being explored. I’m not saying you should accept the ridiculous use, overuse, etc, or even that you should accept their use at all; I’m saying you should consider the nuances, and maybe attempt to sympathize or empathize with someone who actually has PTSD (as opposed to a “snowflake”, or whatever). Cheers ❤️🏴♾
Alex Lyon It was a Jewish joke, nobody can complain about it.
I never understood that shit I was actually traumatized and that’s how you get over it not by ignoring it that gives you nightmares and shit.
Well done to him for that.
I’m always staggered by how someone can express themselves with such nuance and adept articulation in a second language. Incredible.
Also clearly an original, intelligent and charismatic man. Great watch
What I find fascinating is that his prepared, written down speeches, sound a lot like his improvised comments.
@@Horus... Don't be so patronizing. Language connects cultures and it's always amazing to see someone being such an eloquent speaker in a foreign language. It's a sign of respect, and a compliment to the culture the language has cultivated, that the foreigner is willing to learn and speak the language to a level most natives can't even compare to.
Google made me do it you’re right in that my previous comment was not the nicest, it was obnoxious, which is why I deleted it. however, it’s unnecessary to put the action of speaking a foreign language in terms of respect, otherwise it will bring out the issue of valuation thereby making the whole contrasting situation inevitably patronising, in other words, you cannot speak about respect without having pre-established precepts of what is respectable and why it is respectable.
@@Horus... Let me put it this way, it's flattering. Flattery often amounts to mutual respect.
Google made me do it The flattery point it’s totally understandable, I’m almost touched by it.(no sarcasm). The thing is if you deal with this matter in terms of respect, you fall down the rabbit hole of patronising. Simply because speaking English is something of a mandate, as it is with any lingua Franca, people “have to” speak English as they would speak Mandarin should things turn around in the International balance of power.
I mean, you do your best with the hand you’re dealt, it doesn’t mean the House has any respect whatsoever, so long as they keep coming, “the House always wins”, they just watch in contempt.
"I will not go into it now"
*precedes to go into it*
Smart man. Great sense of humor. And no bullshit. Grips one’s attention in the most unusual way.
Actually it's bullshit from start to finish
For me, he makes many a great point, but all of us make statements that could be considered BS, especially people who are involved in, and in front of the public, and doing public speaking. There's certain things and/or attitudes I disagree with but I primarily enjoy his mind and appreciate his thinking because it provocates me and tickles the sociological bone
@John Swift your narrow mind perceives what he says as 'bullshit' because you struggle to conduct critical thinking for yourself, perhaps because you are scared to accept what he says has a lot of bearing and truth to it.
with 5 litres fof spit
I don't understand half of what Slavoj is saying but I love listening to the man, and so on and so on.
*sniff sniff* (rubs nose)
Precisely
I can Understand clearly, maybe because i'm Polish so his accent makes It easier to understand than British
I totally get what he is saying. Most people here does im sure.
My heart goes out to the next speaker that came after this man
How this guy fights Covid-19 is beyond my understanding. . . .
He is on coke, the covid hoax wont get him.
Head on.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
he only does it when he's nervous
Covid is scared of him
he speaks publicly in a kind of beautiful stream of consciousness, his mind is buzzing with idea, love it
My man looking like some enlightened commie Freddie Krueger
bro, bless you for that comment. my man
Qué haces aquí :0
el MIGALA getting famous nine months ago jajajaja
What are you doing here, Migala?
Upload your next video nigga! I'm just kidding.
I watch Zizek whenever I have a cold.
GoFundMe for hand sanitizer and Kleenex.💩👿👹👺😡
Need mediteranian temperature.
Is it because he sounds like he has cold all the time?
@@dp503 yes
@@pixelprincess9 Or is on cocaine 😂
To have an intellectual speech like this interrupted by an ad every 5 minutes is a travesty. It's a greedy shame
Go ad less it's worth the money
A D B L O C K
D
B
L
O
C
K
This is why I don't have an ethical problem with using adblockers. If you want to support Zizek (or someone with a TH-cam channel), buy their books/products or donate money to them.
Capitalism baby
View it as a test or rather price of the knowledge right like you're paying the knowledges worth with patience which is hardly a price for that what is priceless
I was expecting his full address but I never got to find out where he lives!
🤣
Killin it, Alan
Nice one, Alan!
I'm sure you could message him directly to give him a reacharound. No need to go to his place directly!
Hahaha that made me smile
He always comes out with something new for me to think about. He's a good salesman really when he touches on something i want to know more about then cuts it short and encourages you to buy his book.
"Surplus enjoyment: Profit that you get from apparently denigrating, humiliating yourself"
Zizek 2019
A potlatch
Its amazing that Zizek would just give away his address like this, I will visit him weekly
But seriously, can I give you some facking fruit juice or what?
"Here it is included the cancer you get"
Ian Cheung “milf nothing against”
"You plug in yours I plug in mine and we let the machines do the work, then we can talk about philosophy or whatever"
Hahahaha
Lmaooo
really enjoyed zizek's chris chan cosplay
lololololololol
lmao
Nice name
but during the stone age
Had to look up who that was and now I am sad.
A philosopher with balls enough to speak his mind. A rare breed.
Speaking your mind is part of the job description for philosophers lmao
i think youll find most philosophers speak their mind...
My third eye just opened after listening to this. No, but seriously, an excellent speech.
He made several good and pointed at the problems we are facing as a society. I've read his book and he try to explain things with unique perspective. Really a brilliant man
OMG such a definition for Christianity's atheism, that it made me understand my own recent atheism. "The secret core of Christianity is precisely this acceptance of being on your own as a divine gift. What's the Christian's answer when you feel alone, abandoned by God, just depending on yourself? The message is that this is God's gift to you, this is the freedom that God gave us". wow
and so on and so on...
And so on and so forth
Etcetera and so on
*pulls collar, sniffs nose*
as it were
I will give it to you briefly ...
RIP his nose
too much cocaine
Well that was a lot of coke
Douglas Sirk because it’s a tic I think
@@Real_vanGogh yeah definitely at least partly a public speaking tick
@@mantisoblicua there is so good amphetamine in Slovenia you wouldn't touch cocaine.
I feel like the proper ending to the Auschwitz joke would've been better if it was:
Jewish man throws his arm over God patronizingly and says, "Don't worry, you had to be there to really get it"
He is an immensely articulated person
He is undoubtedly a genius. This does not affirm everything he says to be true, and does not limit anyone's freedom to disagree with his interpretation of philosophical works and ideas. But he undoutedly is a genius.
@Ev MIles you really don't understand him , he said Hitler etc were not violent in terms of the radical change they brought, not actual violence , he said that the terminology he uses means that Ghandi was more violent and better In his terms than Hitler , you simply don't understand him . He answered this in an interview
@@seankelly378 he didnt say that for the physical violence that happened. But he means violently changing the structure of the state. Ghandi was more violent in this way.
Thoroughly enjoyed listening
@@retiredshitposter1062 maybe was in the audience..
To the adds
Best New Year’s gift
well said *snort* my friend!
It would be a good idea to stop commenting on his ticks or his reproduction rights and just enjoy the thoughtful discourse!
Nah, keep the meme rolling.
Unless you want him to be less known?
as any confucian could say: "when the sage points at the moon, the fools look at his finger"
As if the LobsterCrew would be able to comment on anything else...
@@armwrestlingfan6804 Having read a few of his books and listening to his ideas I am not worried about his popularity brother! People who have nothing worthy need memes to become famous
@@dasytphantom9354 Right
Here's a joke, a Slovenian philosopher walks into a room full of the future privileged bourgeoisie 1% and they hang on every word.
i dont get it
What's the punchline?
Lefties won't get it
@@koolfrisco_ttm8558 *patronizingly puts arm around shoulder*
you weren't there, you wouldn't get it
The joke is that the people he's addressing are from Oxford and will eventually go on to become the next 1% at the top of society. He's literally down-sizing the society the students attending are about to have the most influence on. He's pissing in their pond!
53:41 Quantum physics = when God thought we would not be able to explore at that level and said "F#&! it, I won't program it". LOL
The messy backend.
On the sixth day, approaching the deadline, God said: "F#&! it, it is good enough". And He saw that is was good enough.
Or like, it's more intelligent than we are, but we measure shit in relation to our egos.
@@then35t18 Ah, but that's continental philosophy speaking! Where is the analytical solution to this problem?
@@DarkAngelEU That's kind of my point. We measure shit in relation to ourselves and have the arrogance to think we know anything about anything. You want analyzation? From a fixed, biased perspective of an organism that fucks, eats and shits? And you think it's going to be accurate? I personally think we put shit in boxes to make ourselves feel better about how small we really are. Let me ask you something. Have you ever thrown a football? Did you have to do the insane calculations that it would take for your body to be able to act in accordance to propel such an object? Angle, velocity, how much muscle performance is needed for the exact distance and height of the throw? Or did you just feel it out?
Slajov is my favorite lunatic. I have no idea what he's talking about but he's a trip to watch and tells good jokes. I only wish I was smart enough to understand his lectures lol.
Read his books. It's not beyond understanding.
@Ali Vonal What is his best book? Or which is the best book to start with?
Same here!
[Insert comment about Zizek being a charlatan because Chomsky said it and my philosophical knowledge comes solely from watching TH-cam videos]
Chomsky is a charlatan
I am going to watch as many lectures as possible and I will be happy to discuss my TH-cam education and it's real life results.
@@actanonverba91 same lol
@jolena auvuya You're talking as if neither of them had ever written a book?
I respect people who are in this position. It’s like when you see an obese person running laps. They’re at the early stages. You don’t need to go to school to understand this stuff.
About 2 hours too short, but interesting nonetheless
Bless him he is still fighting in the cold war.
as if it really ended
you must be living under a rock , if you think what hes saying doesn't apply to todays world
@@darillus1 try reading it again and visualize the person we're talking about Jim 😂🤣
Must admit - did not think I could listen beyond a couple minutes because of the excessive tics... but was enjoyable when I got past that
After a few dozen hours of him, you hardly notice.
Imagine how hard that would have been. I have a few tics, not this successive but it makes public speaking difficult.
I thought the tics were just a sign of extreme genius working under the hood
@@StrickenSteven It's actually his own alien morse code. He's using gestures to send secret messages. Impossible to decipher, I'm afraid. :P
1.25 speed
this guy must be going through hell wearing face masks
Man his hands are like independent of his body. He has two brains - one for the head and one for the body.
Who doesn't have two brains? You?
it is quite the contrary. he is just one big brain, and when there's a lot of neuronal activity, he starts moving more and more
HAHAHA
Neither seem to be working very well...
one for the nose
I found his way of thinking super interesting and mind bending
Truly I like this version of your speech.
Please share with me your present works.
Watching him during covid lockdown gives me all kinds of anxiety.
My hope is some other animator does Slavoj before South Park, ultimately I want to see South Park do him. He is close to being a cartoon, simply using his own face. Great character and intellect.
If they were honest brokers they would. Hint.
Teachers: Talk clearly, hands on the podium and stay on topic
Slavoj Žižek: *Sniffs* *sniff* *clears throat* *shifts shirt* *pinches nipple*
Delishioush!
Don't judge! You don't know what is he going through .. Just listen what he is saying.
@@agnesbajka6784 Zizek would respond by saying "Don't patronize me and so on. I am well aware that I am filthy and sniff a lot and so on and so forth but I simply - to put it bluntly - don't care!" And then he would relate this topic to some observation of pop-culture and how it is misunderstood because of hegemonic ideology, etc etc etc.
I heard the paradise joke on a previous talk of his via Podcast and he didn't try to explain it. So the delivery was 10 times better. I laughed so loud my housemates thought something was wrong.
I loved his interpretation of Christianity
He is an immensely articulated person despite of being Fidgety and having some nasal allergy. 😝😅😁
He apologises everytime for diverting away from topic too.
Love Him💋
An inspiration to all of us weirdos
Not really an allergy but a nervous tic disorder, most likely caused by neuroticism according to Zizek himself.
Between zizek rubbing his nose off and the 40 ads I had trouble watching this
He has non verbal tourettes
Seriously wtf. Once it goes into Q&A there's literally an ad every minute or two
52:50- 54:03 this is probably the cleverest and funniest thing I have ever heard. Thank you good doctor
Slavoj is brilliant. He jumps back and forth so quickly nobody can define him or pigeon hole him.
What is a pigeon hole? I truly don't know it's meaning in this situation.
@@4evervlora To "pigeon hole" someone is to put them into a category. So defining this guy as a "communist" for example would be pigeon holing him.
There's nothing brilliant about jumping back and forth on your ideas so that you contradict yourself and no one can consistently evaluate your stance. A person should have the integrity and courage to stand by one's ideas and not support contradictory ones.
@@markgregsputnik7288 I was being facetious. I appreciate your earnest response though.
I speak a Slavic language, so it's easy for me to understand him even with his accent. But I've always wondered how much can you native English speakers understand him. Do you have to really TRY to understand him or is it as easy to understand him as someone who has a perfect natural English accent?
no not really, even auto generated captions understand him very well
@@nowimahipster6186 oh yeah it didn't cross my mind to check the captions. thanks btw
@@granDoktor I find it very difficult to understand, as someone from midwest USA, I know what he's saying, but the accent is so thick...
@@lydiawilder5996 Yes his accent is super thick. To be honest I don't think he even tries to sound understandable lol
Find him pretty easy to understand, certainly easier than some UK accents even tho I myself am a yorkshireman
You know, you go through some stages, add up some stuff, and when you get back together with your fellas you tell them about what you've accumulated so far. But then your accumulation starts to die away as you tell them all. And now you gotta go fill it again with new ideas and SO ON.
I'd like to listen to this man, in person, until the very point where his ends, which may be impossible yet, would only be, all the more fun.
He's onto the key issues with identity politics and maybe the grand issues with society, a smart man but tough to follow with his tick. I hope he gets a bigger stage to talk and debate but ofc only if as his says, "the big media" lets him.
As an after thought he really is a tsunami of ideas, leaves you lost in a dozen questions, love it!
Jess Montgomery He is a regular contributor to the large high-quality newspapers in Germany.
Has a Marxian look, cankers and snot with second hand style.
@@christiangeiselmann didn't know that, have followed much of his work as it appears in english. Will dig a little and see what else he's upto. I really must get his new book.
Jess Montgomery The pieces in German newspapers (appearing usually in the feuilleton section, i.e. where culture, arts and intellectual debate have their place) are translated by somebody, I suppose. Although perhaps, as a Slovenian, he may also know German.
5:15 "through this self humiliating gestures, they assert their universality".
Aka: by humiliating myself I get to dictate to others how to behave, what to say, what to think. Not a bad tradeoff...
Superb!
'They are treating me as a child when I am adult!'.
,
Damn, Zizek really did just pull out the, "Maybe the real second coming was the friends we made along the way".
Damn this is awesome. I never thought I would appreciate a marxist so much. Very interesting man.
There’s lots of intriguing marxists. You’ve probably only met the hobby, pseudo-intellectual ones😬
55:00 "I was afraid you were centrist" BASED ZIZEK
who needs centrism and pragmatism when you have pseudo-intellectual cokehead marxists on your side!
@@chrishayes5755 Did you just call Zizek pseudo-intellectual?💀
When he speaks about comedy I can only remember my whole life as a brazilian.
SIM kkkkkkkkkkkkk
Damn I’m sorry to hear Zizek doesn’t play video games anymore. He was a pretty avid player as I recall some years ago.
5 years ago I did not know Zizeg! I’ve only got to know about him in 2024 . What treat!
Im new Philosophy at age of 51 and im now reading my wives Nietzsche.
"Religion is the opium of the people..." is a misunderstanding of the original quote. The full quote from Karl Marx translates as: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people". Often quoted only in part, the interpretation of the metaphor in its context has received much less attention. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_of_the_people
You also need to consider it had the reputation of Marijuana back then as well. All the best western writers used it to "clear their minds," from Poe to Jules Verne to Conan Doyle to Sartre, in Marx' circles opium was at least a useful tool in a philosopher or writers repertoire
Professor was brave enough to bring listeners to some points where patronage and mentoring questions are rises. He mentioned that in the narrow circles Slovenian officials are less anti immigrants than on public. That means he calls to admits that immigrants problem is come up not as he likes to call it "the discrete" event, but a sequence of tries to change the Middle East and North Africa. And by populists claiming that post-communists and other regimes which dominated in Middle East and Africa served challengers to start let's call them "active supporting actions" towards changing those regimes the same populists have to recognise main reason-consequence chain which brought West Europe to the flood of immigrants. 2. I will be impressed and delighted if Oxford Union in a week time will not remove this presentation for accusations in racism.
sorby
Looks like you were wrong
If u feel uncomfortable, that’s sort of the point. Fascinating talk.
Heylll Yeeaas boiii the BIG ZIZ is a tasty new years treat
"...and one of my immigrant friend exploded" hahahah got em
Just found him, great satirist on serious complex issues, full of knowledge and wisdom, honest and unaffected, 'cuts through the crap', original and charismatic, good communication between Interviewer and Slavoj, open to new information, incredible clarity and articulation as an ESL, natural comic style. He is a breath of fresh air from the fake 24/7 Corporate Media's Glamorous News Anchors and their Guests with their superficial politeness of 'Excuse Me' and 'You're Welcome' which is annoying, time-consuming and a weaponized language. Do you think Jesus looked politically correct among those Sand-Dunes. I wonder if those people commented on his looks or chose to listen to his message. I wonder how they ate the 'Bread and Fish' under those conditions. Today, we sanitize our body and our environment with pharma-products while our health is going down-hill. It is obvious Slavoj has some condition and we need to get past it to listen to the content of his talk.
This comment reads like your brain is leaking things you’re worried about in no particular order.
Exactly. Aura Borealis has clearly not read Strunk’s Elements of Style! The lack of rhetorical restraint on a Zizek video is offensive!!! Good for you letting this person know how stupid they sound three years later. May Cicero guide Aura to terse banality.
@Chodex This is a Zizek thread. A thinker that specifically said he does not believe in tolerance as a concept. Who is persecuting you?
@Chodex I'm not sure who are the intolerant liberals that you are worried about. If they are young people then they are very silly. That generalization that liberals are the most intolerant is not true. Christian Nationalists are quite intolerant as well. But these are distractions from the existential threats facing humanity. Cunning people create chaos to have more access to power whatever label they have assumed. I like Zizek because he is very kind, pleasant, funny although he is often proclaiming how hated and horrible he is.
@Chodex I am not upset. If you are not upset about the liberals the why are you complaining so much? Don’t try to project your feelings of anger, fear, and rage on me. Please stroke your own hair first.
Looking sharp in the Hilfiger my man. Is that a denim collar?
That may be the loudest entrance applause I've heard on here, love it!
Been waiting on this one
This man has always been a true master at marrying a strong, thought-provoking real world concept with a somtimes shocking, provocative and hilarious joke.
34:37 very interesting remarks and interpretation regarding Christianity
Rare thinker of 21st century... completely shaken
Zizek arrasa tudo o que é incoerente! Se cada país tivesse ao menos UM Zizek, a política seria mais séria!
No
I like Žižek, especially while he says paradigm.
Zizek always looks like he hasn't washed in weeks, and I rather like how he just chooses to embrace that look.
I find his lectures meditative.
If you hit this 1:15:08 and then just press the reply button the ads disappear
He got my attention!! Strong points
He has 20 in int and wis, but con was his dump stat. I suspect his str and dex are low too.
Still, I love him, so charisma is at least 17.
At 4 minutes, I'm hooked!
@@retiredshitposter1062 Exactly! Thank you Sir!
@Ramses77 He was spot on with that prediction actually.
@@retiredshitposter1062 The video was the exact opposite of your lame strawman summary void of truth. Even in this video he is constantly critiquing authoritarian leftist regimes and making jokes like how the proper Q&A in stalinist russia would have the questions distributed by the state party, etc etc
@@retiredshitposter1062 your comment is a shining example of what happens when one makes an assessment of a particular thing without engaging with the thing itself.
it's nice that you're upfront about not having watched any footage, but even if you hadn't made it clear, your commentary would have as your summation is woefully inaccurate.
Given your username, it would seem you might be good at infiltrating echo chambers, but not escaping them. It seems clear to me that your speech is in tune with the speech of countless others that regurgitate nonsense.
@@retiredshitposter1062 funny thet you use the term cringey, as if what you feel about something would tell you any reality about the thing. This is philosophic talk mate, if you are going to listen, weep your load at home beforehand
It's really hard to keep track of what he is saying, especially because he talks about really complex things. Anyway, I'm eager to see him debating Dr. Peterson next month
did u whatch the debate?
I really enjoyed seeing peterson unmasked as the
charlatan he is.
B. Janisch Peterson nearly gave him a hand job on stage
@@b.janisch4108 I saw two people having a civil and productive discussion. You obviously just saw what you wanted to see. sad.
@@duncangriffiths4399 how was this in any way productive? both argued from differend points and cryed a bit how mean the left is. only "productive" thing was that now everybody knows that peterson has no clue what so ever when he is talking about post modernism and or marxism. and if you didnt saw that, well maby you should read your own comment - the last line again ;)
Brilliant man ❤️
Love this guy
James May has really changed
One would assume that top gear kept him level
But his rugby sweater hasn't.
For the love of god, it's spelled TIC, not tick.
Calling a tic tick is just a tic you can get from ticks. And that was more insightful than anything Zizek ever thought, let alone said.
Thor
you seem ticked off about it.
What if they (we) all mean that he has literal ticks up his nostrils?
Obey. You wouldn't like to say "he Thor me athunder".
@@tarnopol Dunning Krueger right here
I want to jus say that I am Orthodox Christian and a bishop at my church was explaining his reason for believing in God in this way "One cannot say he does not believe in God when he believes in miracles. That I speak and that you understand what I have said. That you speak and I understand what you said. This is a miracle." I just want to say that Slavoj does not disappoint as a Christian atheist. He is as good as the well-read theologians. He understands religion in a way Christopher Hitchens and the flock never could, however many bible verses they memorized.
žižek is back on track. happy to see
I would kill 1'000 kittens to see Zizek and Peter Hitchens have a conversation.
Better yet, his brother Christopher
Drinking game:
Take a sip for every "and so on" and a shot when he says it twice in succession.
If you want to kill your liver - do it after every *sniff*
...optisch & akustisch immer wieder ein Fest!... (:
5:50 in my mother tongue language (which is Mizo) we have a term for what you are saying, when a person acts that way, "inngaitlawm chapo" basically meaning: prideful humility/humblenes. This would be a literal translation.
Very captivating. The man's amount of knowledge is stunning. Also. You olny can make so many runny nose jokes till they get old.. Did you try actually listening to him?