Google be like : "no ,help , help me , oh no, I have no air , help" " *did you know it says on wikipedia that air is made up of 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen and other small amounts of gases* " lol
The term "chaotic system" has specific technical meaning in mathematics and dynamics. It isn't just any deterministic but hard to predict system. It is a system whose state trajectory is critically dependent on initial conditions. This means that in general to predict the output with accuracy A over a timescale T takes an accuracy Aprime in the knowledge of the initial conditions, where Aprime goes toward zero with a rate which increases rapidly with T. For example, to predict the output to within 1% over 1 second might take an initial condition accuracy of 1%, but to predict the output to within 1% over 2 seconds might take 0.1% initial condition accuracy, and 3 seconds 0.001% accuracy, etc., so that in order to predict the output for even a short time period like 10 seconds would take an impossibly high accuracy in the initial measurements. Some chaotic systems even exhibit bifurcation, which means that at a certain time t after starting, the graph of all possible trajectories diverges sharply and discontinuously in the initial conditions, so that would you need infinite accuracy just to predict the output beyond that finite time t, but it is still deterministic in a sense because if you know the exact initial conditions, you still know which way it will go.
I've gotten the timing of flipping quarters so good, I can accurately predict what side it will land on about %85 of the time. Not even exaggerating. Maybe I'll make a youtube video about it lol
@@nothingbutpain863not exactly. It’s a case of predictable chaos. Roll a dice exactly the same way, you get the exact same roll. Same concept, though the random-esque air movement such as a breeze makes it much harder
@@Aaa-vp6ug , the concept of predictable chaos exists but is unreal to us humans. We can't repeat precise movements. Such predictability is insignificant. As I was saying, this dice-rolling feat is merely luck.
That was Schrödinger's Equation on the Whiteboard. It describes how the wavefunction of a Particle develops over time. In Quantum mechanics it is impossible to know the exact position of a particle. The particles wavefunction basically tells you the probability of the particle being in a certain place. You used the equation because even though for single particles the location of the particle is completely random, when you have many of them they start to act deterministically as a group, just like the beads in the Galton board! And everything we observe on a human scale is made up of so many particles, that to us, our world seems completely deterministic.
BenRickProductions perfect but you didn’t mention that solving the shrodinger equation gives boundary surfaces of atomic orbitals. And that you could have mentioned that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is why both velocity and position can’t be measured at the same time - which gives for randomness and hence a closer explanation to the use of the equation
Whenever he says hey Google my phones Google assistant appears and pauses the video... At this point I'm not sure if he knows and is doing it for the prank or if he's completely oblivious to how disruptive it is 😂
You don't have voice match turned on, do you? It's probably better you enable it, because otherwise people might be able to get personal information out of your phone without unlocking it depending on the other settings.
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions Voice match sucks, i had it setup and trained it. A guy at work with a VERY different tone of voice tried to quickly mimick my voice and the second attemp the phone picked it up as a match. ROFL .. After this i found out about preventing it from completing actions while being locked.. it bugs me a bit since i cant change song while driving just by shouting " HEY GOOGLE ; NEXT SONG MAN " which was pretty cool.
@@yanz1232 Changing songs when driving would be the allow voice commands on bluetooth devices option. But if it doesn't work well for you then yeah turn it off. I'v generally had good success with it, maybe due to a fairly different voice, but depends on the person a lot.
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions it works but says it needs to be unlock to do that.. Ive put my fingerprint on and it went and skipped the song as it unlocked
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions my dad's voice is exactly like mine but an octave lower and we both have Google pixels, so his phone picks up my voice if I lower it and my phone picks up his voice if he does it higher pitched
That's schrodinger's equation! You wrote it to remember that evolution of sistems is completely random. But the probabilities of the different evolutions is completely determined by that equation, given initial probabilities.
Really. I went to the trajectory of an electron fired at a board you know the experiment in quantum physics where the elctron acts like a wave. Close enough(if not the same but woth an example)
The Action Lab The Action Lab The Action Lab Play with 100% ethanol and liquid nitrogen, please! The way it changes to a solid is really interesting! I would suggest you do 3 things specifically. 1. Pour some ethanol in a container, then surround the container in liquid N2 and watch what happens. 2. Pour some liquid N2 on top of the ethanol (you get an interesting leidenfrost effect here). 3. Pour the ethanol directly into some liquid N2. It creates really cool structures. Thanks!!!
This video got a thumbs up just for that pseudo random generator explanation. As a programmer, I found the simplicity of that explanation to be so beautiful and will use it in the future when explaining the concept to others.
@@jamesramirez0408 I also know that you didn't like your own comment that you didnt write smth else first then deleted it because in that comment you seem "smarter" and I didnt get a notification for this. And I also know that you are REALLY fun at parties... I know how to use sarcasm too :D
That double pendulum's behavior was really cool. It had some parallels with the rolling sphere model for determining the behavior final step leaders in lightning strikes. Not exactly the same, but still - very interesting!
Roy Lavecchia That applies to most things. But not things like atomic decay. As far as we know, its completly random. Thats just sn example, there are more.
This predication of random and "random seeds" from software is exactly why I was very annoyed and skeptical when decades ago my state lottery switched from ping pong balls to computer generated. Okay first off, I know I know, ping pong balls could be more or equal to digital generation as far as manipulation and predictability. My feeling at the time was if someone was going to cheat, make them work really hard at it. These days I think it would be easier to hack a computer based lottery draw than hacking the ping pong balls as happened in the past. The inside job cheaters injected water into all the balls except the winning numbers pre-picked to manipulate a play 3 bet. The lighter balls went up the shoot faster, heavier balls stayed at the bottom. They got caught because it was so clearly obvious something weird happened. My thought when the lottery switched to computer numbers for security and cost, was there was no way to double check a computer draw for manipulation. There were no ping pong balls to check later. No paper trail. Anyway I was convinced I won more with ping pong balls than with computer picks. :)
@@TheActionLab Holy cow! I had no idea that actually happened! Back in the day, I worked for an ad agency that promoted all the games for the state lottery. I use to illustrate posters (before photoshop existed, airbrushing big piles of money is NOT fun. The masking is a nightmare). I was also a bit of a computer nerd... just a bit... and was familiar with random generators back in the late 80's early 90s as was experimenting with very simple programing on the Macs we used. When the lottery announced this change to computer numbers I really sort of kind of freaked out a tiny little bit. No one where I worked understood anything I was trying to tell them. No one agreed with me. When I tried to explain "random seeds" and how it related to computer programming their eyes would glaze over and they would feign falling to sleep, making little snoring noises. Yes I was kind of nerdy back then. I am sure I deserved it. :)
advanced govt security computers listen to radio static, audio noise, or radio decay to get real randomness. Not sure if the lottery uses any of that but it should with how much money is at stake.
4:36 I think there are more combinations for balls to fall in the center then in the side For example Combinations for ball to fall in the most left section: LLLLLLLLLL only 1 combination Combinations for ball to fall in the center: LRLRLRLRLR RLRLRLRLRL RRRRRLLLLL LLLRRRRRLL ... (basically have the same amount of R's and L's) L = ball bounces to left R = ball bounces to right [Sorry for my english]
I have a few questions. BTW, GA stands for Google Assistant. 1. How do you get someone to sponsor you? Is it just random, or are you actually begging them or telling them? 2. Why did you need this fancy GA stuff if you can do it all yourself? Then comes the behind-the-scenes (kinda) stuff! 3. What mechanism makes the screen go up? I know it's Google Assistant, but what does do it? 4. Where did you get all the Google related stuff (like fans) and the safety check siren? For the siren, what GA things make it do the stuff? And all the things like turning off the light? 5. Is the GA logo on the whiteboard just printed paper glued on the board, or something else?
Khawab Raghuvanshi A pretty conjecture that says all the solutions of the Riemann zeta function(look it up, I can’t explain this in a TH-cam comment) fall within a certain range.
@@khawabraghuvanshi8052 Aight, imagine you wanted to add together 1/1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... = (1/1)^2 + (1/2)^2 + (1/3)^2 + ... Well this sum actually does have a value, i.e. it converges, and it is equal to (pi^2)/6, which I will not explain here, but look for the Basel circle problem. Ok, now imagine replacing that exponent of 2 with another number, say s. Then you have a function of s, equal to the sum of (1/n)^s from n=1 to infinity. In other words, (1/1)^n + (1/2)^n + (1/3)^n + ... Well clearly this thing isn't defined for all s, like s=1 is just the harmonic series, which diverges to infinity. But... There's this function called the Riemann Zeta function. It takes in complex numbers, that is, numbers with both real and imaginary (b*i where i is the sqrt(-1)) components, and spits out another complex number. The Riemann Zeta function of a complex number s is written as ζ(s). But get this, the function actually *continues* the sum we just described using something in complex analysis called analytic continuation. Basically it extends the formula to include those numbers that don't make sense, like s=1. Interestingly for some s, ζ(s)=0. When s is a negative even integer (like -2, -4, -6, ...), ζ(s)=0, and these values are called the trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function because (relatively speaking) they are easy to prove. However, the Riemann Hypothesis concerns those zeroes that are not negative even integers. Specifically the Riemann Hypothesis states that: All non-trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function are complex numbers with real part (1/2), i.e. complex numbers of the form (1/2) + b*i for some real coefficient b. It's been proven that all non-trivial zeroes must lie in a "critical strip" where the real part is between 0 and 1 (in fact the proof is relatively easy, arising from the same formula used to prove the trivial zeroes), but the proof (or disproof) that they all must have real part (1/2) remains elusive. There is a $1,000,000 prize to anyone who can prove or disprove it (it is a Millennium Problem). The reason it's so important is because the problem relates to a lot, and I mean a *lot*, of other problems, including some regarding prime numbers. I won't go into any here, but take my word that if you prove the Riemann Hypothesis then you will go down in history as one of the greatest mathematicians to have ever lived.
There is no such thing as true random, randomness in simply a product of lack of information. All things in life are cause and effect, all things are constantly affected by millions of factors simultaneously. Our concept of randomness is created by our inability to measure and behold most of those causes
How do we know that quantum mechanics has true randomness? How do we know that we're just not lacking the information that would show that it's not truly random?
I refuse to believe that. Its true that the more chaotic a system is the more predictable it is because there are more actions being taken to determine a variety of factors, but I believe there is inherit randomness to things at least in the smallest portion.
@@davidcrandall3643 People have proposed that we just don't understand it well enough and so there might be hidden variables that actually determine what appears to be random. Such theories are called hidden variable theories. However, Bell's theorem pretty much disproves the possibility of such hidden variables so we can be pretty confident that we're dealing with true randomness.
I have two ideas. The first is to start at a 180° angle and record the level of chaos as you slowly approach 90° and maybe even go beyond. The second idea is to test it on a spinning platform where you slowly move it away from the center.
🎓Who does know everything - Who magnetizes Mice?🐭 👑Who is the Quantum King - more random than a Dice?🎲 💪Who vacuums his Arm - Who beats the 4th Dimension?🌈 ✨Who has the biggest Charm - and gets all the Attention?⚠ 🌟*~The Action Lab~* 🌟 🌟*~The Action Lab~*🌟 🌟*~The Action Lab~*🌟
Ok like this really got me. You said Google flip a coin for me and my Google assistant did that because I was listening on speakers 😂😂😂 Than you said dim the light and my screen got darker
Randomness is based on perspective, their is no system that can’t be precisely predicted unless the factors are not measurable. Theoretically however we can calculate every factor going back to the Big Bang.
If you think about it, if nothing is random then everything that has happened from the beginning of the universe and everything that will happen is already predetermined. In other words you have absolutely no free will, feel insignificant yet?
There’s just one error with that logic. You used the term “predetermined,” which implies some overarching consciousness or system making decisions on the outcome of the universe. However, I believe a better term to use is “inevitable.” This is because of the hypothetical concept that if you take a decision you made at “x” point in time, and then reset the entire universe to its exact position as it stood in that point in time, that decision would be the same. However, it wasn’t determined, it was merely unavoidable. You could argue that with enough information, every decision could be predicted. Collect all the variables, you could know the end result. But what if free will was accepted as information to collect? You could argue free will to be a combination of facts and influences leading to some statistical outcome as perceived by the person with the will in question. However, that still wouldn’t alter the inevitability because of the situation I showed. Free will and consciousness would still follow that concept. I’m glad I researched this. #BigQuestionsDebate20162017.
Carsyn Jacobsen the ‘system’ in question are the laws of Physics determined by the basic fields that our universe operates on. As for using all the variables in order to predict the future, if such a device was to be created it would need to be completely isolated and not included in the data in order for it to work, rendering it pretty much useless. The point I was trying to make was that time isn’t linear according to the theory, not moving in one direction as we perceive it at least, instead all moments of time throughout space are simultaneous and it’s just our perception of the order that makes it appear to be moving creating the illusion of free will and probability ect.
It is admirable how this guy developed this ability to focus on absurd concepts, and make something interesting out of them. I believe he used to ask lots of dumb questions when little, and his not brighter father bullied him with insufficient answers, while his mother supported him and encouraged him anyway so much, that she helped him become this scientific monster, proving there is light at the end of a dumb question.
My3dviews that’s true but because division can’t increase number it either has to be -1 or 0. Because anything divided by 0 is always 0 than it’s 0 out of those two. Hope that could help!
The answer is undefined, it is not exactly known if it equals 1, 0 or -1, and almost is almost dependent on how you mathematically approach the problem, but you cant say for certainty, it is any answer
As a funny aside, I had to unplug my Google Nest Mini while watching this video, because it was very confused. I got the Nest Mini for free for being a long-standing TH-cam Premium subscriber. It's actually on par if not better than my Alexa Echo Dot Gen2 in the other room. I didn't even know the Nest Mini existed until I got the popup on my phone while watching a TH-cam video directing me to claim it (I didn't even have to pay for shipping). Google definitely needs to improve their marketing strategies for their gadgets, because if a senior programmer like myself doesn't even know the product existed, how on earth is the average consumer going to know.? 😶
The given equation is the famous Schrödinger's Time Dependent Wave Equation. It gives the solution of a wave function which is a function of time and space and is widely used in Quantum Mechanics to get an idea how quantum particles interact with each other. From this we can also get the Eigen value of an Eigen function. The operator used here is the Hamiltonian operator. This equation can be used to get an idea of randomness, because wave function is a probabilistic concept.
Night mare Not quite, science is related to Math and is the result of making precise measurements as demonstrated in the coin flip in the beginning of the video😊
I was about to say science uses math, but science is not math.... HOWEVER, thinking about it more, "science" in it's broadest sense is just a systematic quantification of knowledge... math is the expression of quantities and their relation to each other. It's a pretty blurred line, but I'd almost say that math IS a science, the science of quantities. Definitely debatable though.
Science is a form of maths, and vice versa. Maths helps explain science at a fundamental hence the use of the shrodinger equation - a mathematical equation helps determine shape of atomic orbitals.
"Every Cause has its Effect; every Effect has its Cause; everything happens according to Law; Chance is but a name for Law not recognized; there are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the Law."--The Kybalion.
This chain of cause and effect continues on and must continue backwards. Without the first cause, the chain cannot exist. The first cause must be uncaused, exempt from the Law. It must have made the Law. It must be outside the Law.
if we were so predictable i would click on 93% of the ads by google and would watch 93% of the recomended videos by youtube even when google knows more about me than anyone else.
I have a suggestion! If you can totally predict a coin flip knowing all of the initial conditions, can you build a device that will drop a coin with all controllable conditions so you can predict 100% accurately how it would land and actually demonstrate it? Meaning if you do the same exact conditions twice, you could play the two drop videos side by side and the coin would bounce off the table IDENTICALLY? would be really cool to see!
@@petersteier why can’t it work in real life? If we create a device that holds a coin in an exact position provide the exact amount of energy in a vacuum?
All the normal distribution curve means is that if you take a large enough group, you can predict what the average person will do - it doesn't mean the outliers cease to exist. It just gives you probabilities of behaviours & outcomes.
Theoretically, every single thing that will ever happen is predictable. But you could only predict it all with damn near infinite knowledge of every factor, every event, simply everything. With this mentality you could consider everything bound to happen. So ladies and gentlemen, the meaning of life is nothing!
A long time ago I had a theory concerning coin flipping. I gave it a shot when with a friend and his cousin. I correctly predicted each coin flipping outcome 26 times in a row. It stopped at 26 since this was when I stopped the coin flipping test. Midway, my friends thought that I was cheating somehow, so I let one of them do the coin flipping instead while I had my back facing them. This made no difference. I still gave the correct predictions.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 80 | คู่เอก "รักษ์ vs ยอดนำชัย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckLMRorsMeY/mqdefault.jpg)
#HeyGoogle...they did surgery on a grape
Hey google she took the kids
its been years and this just became a popular mem- wait! DO A SURGERY ON A BANANA!
*they did grape 🍇 on a surgery*
Look at this guys neck... its so big
The Action Lab 1979 - do you have flying cars?
2010-2018 nO bUt TheY diD SurGErY oN A grApE!!!
"Now we're going to put the google assistant in a vacuum chamber"
😂😂😂😂😂😂
That means that it would not work becouse there is no sound
@@memor22 Can we put ALL of them in there?
Google be like :
"no ,help , help me , oh no, I have no air , help"
" *did you know it says on wikipedia that air is made up of 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen and other small amounts of gases* " lol
Lol
So TH-cam sponsored itself
lol xD
Yep
😂😂😂😂
Yep.. pretty much
Oh wow, quality comments are back
1900:We will have robots in 2018
2018:Google Asisetant flip a coin...
WoW
0:31
M G unoriginal
And there already was robots in 1980
But it sounds much better than what they thought it would sound like in 1900s.
Omg you don’t know how to spell
#HeyGoogle would you kyndly...
The term "chaotic system" has specific technical meaning in mathematics and dynamics. It isn't just any deterministic but hard to predict system. It is a system whose state trajectory is critically dependent on initial conditions. This means that in general to predict the output with accuracy A over a timescale T takes an accuracy Aprime in the knowledge of the initial conditions, where Aprime goes toward zero with a rate which increases rapidly with T. For example, to predict the output to within 1% over 1 second might take an initial condition accuracy of 1%, but to predict the output to within 1% over 2 seconds might take 0.1% initial condition accuracy, and 3 seconds 0.001% accuracy, etc., so that in order to predict the output for even a short time period like 10 seconds would take an impossibly high accuracy in the initial measurements. Some chaotic systems even exhibit bifurcation, which means that at a certain time t after starting, the graph of all possible trajectories diverges sharply and discontinuously in the initial conditions, so that would you need infinite accuracy just to predict the output beyond that finite time t, but it is still deterministic in a sense because if you know the exact initial conditions, you still know which way it will go.
The comment I was looking for!
learned sth new today
Yeah, that makes sense.
Yeah, that makes sense.
My brain hurts
I've gotten the timing of flipping quarters so good, I can accurately predict what side it will land on about %85 of the time. Not even exaggerating. Maybe I'll make a youtube video about it lol
do it
With all due respect, it is mere luck unless you can manipulate your luck like Nagito Komaeda.
@@nothingbutpain863not exactly.
It’s a case of predictable chaos.
Roll a dice exactly the same way, you get the exact same roll.
Same concept, though the random-esque air movement such as a breeze makes it much harder
@@Aaa-vp6ug , the concept of predictable chaos exists but is unreal to us humans. We can't repeat precise movements. Such predictability is insignificant. As I was saying, this dice-rolling feat is merely luck.
I love the way at 3:10 the pendulum follows the song rithm for a while
That was random
Lol
woW🙎♂️🙎♂️🙎♂️🙎♂️
There was so much chaos, he predicted that it would match the rhythm.. See what i did there
Yeah, makes it sexy
That was Schrödinger's Equation on the Whiteboard. It describes how the wavefunction of a Particle develops over time. In Quantum mechanics it is impossible to know the exact position of a particle. The particles wavefunction basically tells you the probability of the particle being in a certain place.
You used the equation because even though for single particles the location of the particle is completely random, when you have many of them they start to act deterministically as a group, just like the beads in the Galton board! And everything we observe on a human scale is made up of so many particles, that to us, our world seems completely deterministic.
Perfect
Now that's too much for a middle schooler =_=
thats why some of the symbols seemed familiar. we had a bit of quantum basics in university lately
BenRickProductions perfect but you didn’t mention that solving the shrodinger equation gives boundary surfaces of atomic orbitals. And that you could have mentioned that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is why both velocity and position can’t be measured at the same time - which gives for randomness and hence a closer explanation to the use of the equation
Are you smart or am i stupid or both
Whenever he says hey Google my phones Google assistant appears and pauses the video... At this point I'm not sure if he knows and is doing it for the prank or if he's completely oblivious to how disruptive it is 😂
You don't have voice match turned on, do you? It's probably better you enable it, because otherwise people might be able to get personal information out of your phone without unlocking it depending on the other settings.
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions Voice match sucks, i had it setup and trained it. A guy at work with a VERY different tone of voice tried to quickly mimick my voice and the second attemp the phone picked it up as a match. ROFL ..
After this i found out about preventing it from completing actions while being locked.. it bugs me a bit since i cant change song while driving just by shouting " HEY GOOGLE ; NEXT SONG MAN " which was pretty cool.
@@yanz1232
Changing songs when driving would be the allow voice commands on bluetooth devices option. But if it doesn't work well for you then yeah turn it off. I'v generally had good success with it, maybe due to a fairly different voice, but depends on the person a lot.
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions it works but says it needs to be unlock to do that.. Ive put my fingerprint on and it went and skipped the song as it unlocked
@@theLuigiFan0007Productions my dad's voice is exactly like mine but an octave lower and we both have Google pixels, so his phone picks up my voice if I lower it and my phone picks up his voice if he does it higher pitched
Google: listening to your private conversations since 1998
Ok
Ok
4:20
*The Action Lab explaining how we can't predict if Half Life 3 will come out.*
@Dehcik Thanks for ruining the joke.
That's schrodinger's equation! You wrote it to remember that evolution of sistems is completely random. But the probabilities of the different evolutions is completely determined by that equation, given initial probabilities.
Harvard wants to know you location
only for dependant events. independent evens are random
Really. I went to the trajectory of an electron fired at a board you know the experiment in quantum physics where the elctron acts like a wave. Close enough(if not the same but woth an example)
i recognized the h with a bar in it from a partially remembered popular science lecture by the pop star brian cox
r/iamverysmart
#HeyGoogle, predict every motion and pattern of every single electron in my body.
Google:- currently they are excited I'll calculate when they are at ground state
@@ricksanchez6110 I'm excited to know the results
Mr.Knight The Detective to the graveyard
Editor: How much product placement do you want in the video?
The Action Lab: Yes!
*Google
It's not product placement, it's sponsorship
3:10 The sync is perfect.
3p1ks amazing
Yeah, you are right. But I think its our brain syncing it.
@Hyperskreem 82 or does it **Vsauce music plays**
Yeah man just use your haki
*true Justin. Y fan*
*ur my inspiration man*
*luv u from Japan* 😭
*Legend says that he replies to*
*His Fans ASAP*
Justin Yimberlake
10th like 😂
Justin Y. Your in every video lol
Holy shit 18 minutes
The Action Lab
The Action Lab
The Action Lab
Play with 100% ethanol and liquid nitrogen, please! The way it changes to a solid is really interesting!
I would suggest you do 3 things specifically.
1. Pour some ethanol in a container, then surround the container in liquid N2 and watch what happens.
2. Pour some liquid N2 on top of the ethanol (you get an interesting leidenfrost effect here).
3. Pour the ethanol directly into some liquid N2. It creates really cool structures.
Thanks!!!
Didn't you just watch the king of random do that?
Man when you said " Hey google, flip a coin" my google assistant replied and flipped a coin XD
When the music started for the chaos part it was perfectly synced and it was 👌
Outstanding! You chose the perfect music for that light pattern!
wow! l predict that this video will be watched by many, including your mom! :) Loved it!
It makes me so happy for some reason that you watch all your sons videos
@@Jinxy23
Thanks so much that is so nice of you to say!
Your sons videos are both fun and informative! :D
This is wholesome not gonna lie
Over 1k comments, what!?
Lmao the hey Google activated my phone's built in Google Assistant 😂
#HeyGoogle flip my house for me
ask seija XD
Don’t you mean unibrow mcGee?
It’s heads
@@niulagoo lol, yup
In the future sure lol
The "Turncoat" in the background kills me inside, Unus Annus
Memento Mori… I died a little inside when I heard it in the background
This video got a thumbs up just for that pseudo random generator explanation. As a programmer, I found the simplicity of that explanation to be so beautiful and will use it in the future when explaining the concept to others.
How to explain to people they are predictable
I knew you would click "read more"
MIND BLOWN
I know you would say that and I know this joke and I know its stolen and I know this is logic and I know kylaxial isnt "minblowned"...
I didn't click it, i tapped it.
Im using a phone
@@jamesramirez0408 I also know that you didn't like your own comment that you didnt write smth else first then deleted it because in that comment you seem "smarter" and I didnt get a notification for this. And I also know that you are REALLY fun at parties... I know how to use sarcasm too :D
@@jamesramirez0408 and no I didn't steal that... Do you really find ot that hard to make your own jokes?
#HeyGoogle! Michael here...
heey vsauce michael here
Google:- hi Michael Google here
Action Lab!
Action Lab!
Action Lab!
Will I not get a love from you because I'm late this time?
Action Lab never disappoints.....
sup
@StraxxGamer88 You liked your own comment. Stop
@StraxxGamer88 Any problem?
@@Jack-tu5zf 😂 😂 😂
That double pendulum's behavior was really cool. It had some parallels with the rolling sphere model for determining the behavior final step leaders in lightning strikes. Not exactly the same, but still - very interesting!
We must remember
Nothing is random.
Nothing.
The truest fact of all.
protizemo s
Thats not true at all. Ofcourse there are random occurences.
@@Ambigious No there really are no random occurrences. Randomness is just an illusion.
Roy Lavecchia
That applies to most things. But not things like atomic decay. As far as we know, its completly random. Thats just sn example, there are more.
This predication of random and "random seeds" from software is exactly why I was very annoyed and skeptical when decades ago my state lottery switched from ping pong balls to computer generated.
Okay first off, I know I know, ping pong balls could be more or equal to digital generation as far as manipulation and predictability. My feeling at the time was if someone was going to cheat, make them work really hard at it. These days I think it would be easier to hack a computer based lottery draw than hacking the ping pong balls as happened in the past. The inside job cheaters injected water into all the balls except the winning numbers pre-picked to manipulate a play 3 bet. The lighter balls went up the shoot faster, heavier balls stayed at the bottom. They got caught because it was so clearly obvious something weird happened.
My thought when the lottery switched to computer numbers for security and cost, was there was no way to double check a computer draw for manipulation. There were no ping pong balls to check later. No paper trail. Anyway I was convinced I won more with ping pong balls than with computer picks. :)
Well there was a mathematician who actually figured out one of the random functions and won the lottery twice in a row. You are correct.
@@TheActionLab Holy cow! I had no idea that actually happened!
Back in the day, I worked for an ad agency that promoted all the games for the state lottery. I use to illustrate posters (before photoshop existed, airbrushing big piles of money is NOT fun. The masking is a nightmare). I was also a bit of a computer nerd... just a bit... and was familiar with random generators back in the late 80's early 90s as was experimenting with very simple programing on the Macs we used. When the lottery announced this change to computer numbers I really sort of kind of freaked out a tiny little bit. No one where I worked understood anything I was trying to tell them. No one agreed with me. When I tried to explain "random seeds" and how it related to computer programming their eyes would glaze over and they would feign falling to sleep, making little snoring noises. Yes I was kind of nerdy back then. I am sure I deserved it. :)
advanced govt security computers listen to radio static, audio noise, or radio decay to get real randomness. Not sure if the lottery uses any of that but it should with how much money is at stake.
we can say the exact same thing about the electronic voting machines of brasil and other shitty places
When you said "hey Google flip a coin" my phone heard it and flipped a coin
4:36
I think there are more combinations for balls to fall in the center then in the side
For example
Combinations for ball to fall in the most left section:
LLLLLLLLLL
only 1 combination
Combinations for ball to fall in the center:
LRLRLRLRLR
RLRLRLRLRL
RRRRRLLLLL
LLLRRRRRLL
...
(basically have the same amount of R's and L's)
L = ball bounces to left
R = ball bounces to right
[Sorry for my english]
i thought your english was fine
slightly bad grammar online is usually fine
4:30 "Comment if you know..." Are you kidding me? I can't ever read it correctly😂
I have a few questions.
BTW, GA stands for Google Assistant.
1. How do you get someone to sponsor you? Is it just random, or are you actually begging them or telling them?
2. Why did you need this fancy GA stuff if you can do it all yourself?
Then comes the behind-the-scenes (kinda) stuff!
3. What mechanism makes the screen go up? I know it's Google Assistant, but what does do it?
4. Where did you get all the Google related stuff (like fans) and the safety check siren? For the siren, what GA things make it do the stuff? And all the things like turning off the light?
5. Is the GA logo on the whiteboard just printed paper glued on the board, or something else?
EVERY SINGLE DAMN TIME THIS DUDE SAID 'hey google!' ASSISTANT POPPED UP!!
You triggered my Google assistant, I got tails, also #HeyGoogle
Mine as well
#HeyGoogle give me a proof of the Riemann hypothesis
What is dat?
Khawab Raghuvanshi
A pretty conjecture that says all the solutions of the Riemann zeta function(look it up, I can’t explain this in a TH-cam comment) fall within a certain range.
HeyGoogle determine whether collatz conjecture is indeed a conjecture or not.
@@khawabraghuvanshi8052 Aight, imagine you wanted to add together 1/1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... = (1/1)^2 + (1/2)^2 + (1/3)^2 + ... Well this sum actually does have a value, i.e. it converges, and it is equal to (pi^2)/6, which I will not explain here, but look for the Basel circle problem.
Ok, now imagine replacing that exponent of 2 with another number, say s. Then you have a function of s, equal to the sum of (1/n)^s from n=1 to infinity. In other words, (1/1)^n + (1/2)^n + (1/3)^n + ... Well clearly this thing isn't defined for all s, like s=1 is just the harmonic series, which diverges to infinity. But...
There's this function called the Riemann Zeta function. It takes in complex numbers, that is, numbers with both real and imaginary (b*i where i is the sqrt(-1)) components, and spits out another complex number. The Riemann Zeta function of a complex number s is written as ζ(s). But get this, the function actually *continues* the sum we just described using something in complex analysis called analytic continuation. Basically it extends the formula to include those numbers that don't make sense, like s=1.
Interestingly for some s, ζ(s)=0. When s is a negative even integer (like -2, -4, -6, ...), ζ(s)=0, and these values are called the trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function because (relatively speaking) they are easy to prove. However, the Riemann Hypothesis concerns those zeroes that are not negative even integers. Specifically the Riemann Hypothesis states that:
All non-trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function are complex numbers with real part (1/2), i.e. complex numbers of the form (1/2) + b*i for some real coefficient b.
It's been proven that all non-trivial zeroes must lie in a "critical strip" where the real part is between 0 and 1 (in fact the proof is relatively easy, arising from the same formula used to prove the trivial zeroes), but the proof (or disproof) that they all must have real part (1/2) remains elusive. There is a $1,000,000 prize to anyone who can prove or disprove it (it is a Millennium Problem).
The reason it's so important is because the problem relates to a lot, and I mean a *lot*, of other problems, including some regarding prime numbers. I won't go into any here, but take my word that if you prove the Riemann Hypothesis then you will go down in history as one of the greatest mathematicians to have ever lived.
@@legendariersgaming Damn that is some explanation! You are the best man...
Thanks.
You said "Hey Google, it's science time" and it actually triggered my mobile assistant. Damn! 😂😂
What? I’m glad I found this old video, the editing and filming is adorable
2:24 You activated my Google Assistant :)
That intro is just frikin Awesome!!
There is no such thing as true random, randomness in simply a product of lack of information. All things in life are cause and effect, all things are constantly affected by millions of factors simultaneously. Our concept of randomness is created by our inability to measure and behold most of those causes
Except quantum mechanics
How do we know that quantum mechanics has true randomness? How do we know that we're just not lacking the information that would show that it's not truly random?
Tachyons are quantum mechanics and are truly random in their direction.
Gottem
I refuse to believe that. Its true that the more chaotic a system is the more predictable it is because there are more actions being taken to determine a variety of factors, but I believe there is inherit randomness to things at least in the smallest portion.
@@davidcrandall3643 People have proposed that we just don't understand it well enough and so there might be hidden variables that actually determine what appears to be random. Such theories are called hidden variable theories. However, Bell's theorem pretty much disproves the possibility of such hidden variables so we can be pretty confident that we're dealing with true randomness.
I have two ideas. The first is to start at a 180° angle and record the level of chaos as you slowly approach 90° and maybe even go beyond.
The second idea is to test it on a spinning platform where you slowly move it away from the center.
I’m here watching satisfying videos while this guy is getting sponsored by Google
🎓Who does know everything - Who magnetizes Mice?🐭
👑Who is the Quantum King - more random than a Dice?🎲
💪Who vacuums his Arm - Who beats the 4th Dimension?🌈
✨Who has the biggest Charm - and gets all the Attention?⚠
🌟*~The Action Lab~* 🌟
🌟*~The Action Lab~*🌟
🌟*~The Action Lab~*🌟
KSP-Crafter nice!
KSP-Crafter why do you only have 3 likes? U deserve 3K
that was criinge
This was cringy but you get a pity like
we need that on a shirt
I like how optimistic you are to find order in chaos :D
Ok like this really got me. You said Google flip a coin for me and my Google assistant did that because I was listening on speakers 😂😂😂 Than you said dim the light and my screen got darker
Randomness is based on perspective, their is no system that can’t be precisely predicted unless the factors are not measurable. Theoretically however we can calculate every factor going back to the Big Bang.
I: Hey google, are you predictable. I think you are gonna say yes. Am I right?
Google Asisetant: No.
If you think about it, if nothing is random then everything that has happened from the beginning of the universe and everything that will happen is already predetermined. In other words you have absolutely no free will, feel insignificant yet?
Hi Sans
Actually we do you preddicted our free will
There’s just one error with that logic. You used the term “predetermined,” which implies some overarching consciousness or system making decisions on the outcome of the universe. However, I believe a better term to use is “inevitable.” This is because of the hypothetical concept that if you take a decision you made at “x” point in time, and then reset the entire universe to its exact position as it stood in that point in time, that decision would be the same. However, it wasn’t determined, it was merely unavoidable. You could argue that with enough information, every decision could be predicted. Collect all the variables, you could know the end result. But what if free will was accepted as information to collect? You could argue free will to be a combination of facts and influences leading to some statistical outcome as perceived by the person with the will in question. However, that still wouldn’t alter the inevitability because of the situation I showed. Free will and consciousness would still follow that concept.
I’m glad I researched this. #BigQuestionsDebate20162017.
Carsyn Jacobsen the ‘system’ in question are the laws of Physics determined by the basic fields that our universe operates on. As for using all the variables in order to predict the future, if such a device was to be created it would need to be completely isolated and not included in the data in order for it to work, rendering it pretty much useless. The point I was trying to make was that time isn’t linear according to the theory, not moving in one direction as we perceive it at least, instead all moments of time throughout space are simultaneous and it’s just our perception of the order that makes it appear to be moving creating the illusion of free will and probability ect.
When you say hey google my phones Google assistant truns on 😂 😂
The background music makes me think of Unus Annus
Rip unus annus
Humans are so predictable that you can predict that humans will be unpredictable
It is admirable how this guy developed this ability to focus on absurd concepts, and make something interesting out of them. I believe he used to ask lots of dumb questions when little, and his not brighter father bullied him with insufficient answers, while his mother supported him and encouraged him anyway so much, that she helped him become this scientific monster, proving there is light at the end of a dumb question.
????????
@@overlord3481 Nevermind, intelligence stuff.
@@tomasseeber don't know if you're tired or just a downright lunatic
2:48 be lookin like every rappers hand while rappin
#HeyGoogle whats 0 divided by 0 dont say i have no friends
Ok then u have no cookies
Answer is 1. A number divided by itself is always 1. Don't care what anyone else says. :-)
My3dviews that’s true but because division can’t increase number it either has to be -1 or 0. Because anything divided by 0 is always 0 than it’s 0 out of those two.
Hope that could help!
The answer is undefined, it is not exactly known if it equals 1, 0 or -1, and almost is almost dependent on how you mathematically approach the problem, but you cant say for certainty, it is any answer
Google:- congratulations u have friend and that's me
And iam imaginary
(Evil morty theme plays)
I’ll save you 7 minutes now. Basically everything is predictable except quantum
Google Assistant. Yeah, just what I want. A robotic assistant that listens to every word I say.
one of the most amazing videos I have ever seen on TH-cam
#HeyGoogle why is everyone saying #HeyGoogle.
lol
#HeyGoogle
Google:Hey
Me:=3
As a funny aside, I had to unplug my Google Nest Mini while watching this video, because it was very confused. I got the Nest Mini for free for being a long-standing TH-cam Premium subscriber. It's actually on par if not better than my Alexa Echo Dot Gen2 in the other room. I didn't even know the Nest Mini existed until I got the popup on my phone while watching a TH-cam video directing me to claim it (I didn't even have to pay for shipping). Google definitely needs to improve their marketing strategies for their gadgets, because if a senior programmer like myself doesn't even know the product existed, how on earth is the average consumer going to know.? 😶
@@tekelupharsin4426 wait what after what time
3:12 it hit that milly rock hard
Please make a video on simple harmonic motion.
You made my chromebook go off at the beginning
The given equation is the famous
Schrödinger's Time Dependent Wave Equation. It gives the solution of a wave function which is a function of time and space and is widely used in Quantum Mechanics to get an idea how quantum particles interact with each other. From this we can also get the Eigen value of an Eigen function. The operator used here is the Hamiltonian operator. This equation can be used to get an idea of randomness, because wave function is a probabilistic concept.
Violet bannana fridge
You didnt predict that comment did you?
Chopped bobs
U didn't expected that either did you.
Silicone sprites
I did cuz you commented it twice
@@maximusrex8689 ahahahah yeah saw that two days ago, you know yotube bugged a bit
Toxic banana in cucumber sauce
#HeyGoogle....is math related to science?😀
I never got these many likes everrr...i know 9 isn't a lot for most of da people...but im happy
Night mare Not quite, science is related to Math and is the result of making precise measurements as demonstrated in the coin flip in the beginning of the video😊
I was about to say science uses math, but science is not math.... HOWEVER, thinking about it more, "science" in it's broadest sense is just a systematic quantification of knowledge... math is the expression of quantities and their relation to each other. It's a pretty blurred line, but I'd almost say that math IS a science, the science of quantities. Definitely debatable though.
Damnnn you guys know a lot
Science is a form of maths, and vice versa. Maths helps explain science at a fundamental hence the use of the shrodinger equation - a mathematical equation helps determine shape of atomic orbitals.
Does nobody get the reference?
The answer is clearly no. Ever seen The King Of Random? Where's no predicting that.. whatever it is
Pretty easy to predict that channel now. It's always some crap involving a vacuum chamber.
KilliKonKarnage it was unpredictable when Grant ran it.. really miss him
Savitar RIP grant
Action Lab: "Hey Google, End this video"
Assistant: "OK, releasing the Zyklon B"
Action Lab: "wait, wut"
Me : so humans are unpredictable right?
The action lab : Uh.., no but actually yes.
"Every Cause has its Effect;
every Effect has its Cause;
everything happens according to Law;
Chance is but a name for Law not recognized;
there are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the Law."--The Kybalion.
This chain of cause and effect continues on and must continue backwards. Without the first cause, the chain cannot exist. The first cause must be uncaused, exempt from the Law. It must have made the Law. It must be outside the Law.
"And random being the Swift fellow he was................"
#HeyGoogle Say to me all of the pi numbers.
@ß ronk I kNoW iTs InfIniTE!11!! I waS JoKinG!!1!
okay, they are 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, but in other order and duplicated
@@Damjes Duplicated? Aren't they in a "random" order? The pi number is a non-periodic dizime (don't know how to spell I'm brazilian).
@@clr1238 pi isnt random, as we have formulas to approach its number, also se pode usar "numeral" ou "character" ou só "number"
3.14159
That's all I know
if we were so predictable i would click on 93% of the ads by google and would watch 93% of the recomended videos by youtube even when google knows more about me than anyone else.
So little finger was truly a genius , he understood what chaos is !!
TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING...2:32
somehow that part made me bursted out laughing
Yay I'm early! Notification squad where u at?
#HeyGoogle hi how are ya
Google:- ("ting ting")I couldn't get it
Im doing good Thanks for asking 😄
Your voice in the video saying "hey google" actually activates the Google speech thing on my phone lol
I have a suggestion! If you can totally predict a coin flip knowing all of the initial conditions, can you build a device that will drop a coin with all controllable conditions so you can predict 100% accurately how it would land and actually demonstrate it? Meaning if you do the same exact conditions twice, you could play the two drop videos side by side and the coin would bounce off the table IDENTICALLY? would be really cool to see!
This works only in computer simulations, where a pencil standing on it's tip will not fall over.
@@petersteier why can’t it work in real life? If we create a device that holds a coin in an exact position provide the exact amount of energy in a vacuum?
Joseph joestar be like:
Your next move is to like this comment!
no
#HeyGoogle is the despacito 2 released yet
"I WISH I CAN DANCE LIKE THAT"
One of the most interesting sponsored videos I've ever seen
The universe is deterministic; we just think it is random. Everything has a cause, down to the movement of every subatomic particle in the universe.
so ironic i came to the exact moment of the vieo release, and this was random
Is Jevil predictable?
True like jevil so much CHAOS
Chaos, chaos!
#HeyGoogle how much amount did you pay to The Action Lab?
Google:- 125999685432541158$
That's a Secret between us 🤫😉
@LᗩᑎDO LᗩᑎD why?
You know you made it big when Google is sponsoring you vedeo!!
Google spies on you so much, I'm sure it _can_ predict what we're going to do lol
#HeyGoogle this video deserves a like!
It seems like you haven't Subscribed yet.
@@googlehome9039 Alright, I subbed. But I only did it for The Action Lab's channel....cause it is awesome.
#heysiri
Google: *"very funny."*
(This actually works lmao)
#HeyGoogle will The Action Lab channel cross 10M subscribers?
Nope
If I grow at the same rate as now it will take 8 years from now. Maybe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@TheActionLab Your kids will take over then😂
By a Statistic of Socialblade, the Mentioned Channel will reach 10 Million Subscribers in about *8-10 Years.*
Did tht pendulum just dance to the beat PERFECTLY? Did anyone else notice? Or am I reaching here?
All the normal distribution curve means is that if you take a large enough group, you can predict what the average person will do - it doesn't mean the outliers cease to exist. It just gives you probabilities of behaviours & outcomes.
Theoretically, every single thing that will ever happen is predictable. But you could only predict it all with damn near infinite knowledge of every factor, every event, simply everything. With this mentality you could consider everything bound to happen.
So ladies and gentlemen, the meaning of life is nothing!
But what about the randomness coming from quantum mechanical effects?
@@rcksnxc361 It's not randomness, you can always calculate the next quantum state if you know all conditions.
#HeyGoogle pray for spongebob's creator
Google:- praying
yeah thats right what he said ;-;
A long time ago I had a theory concerning coin flipping. I gave it a shot when with a friend and his cousin. I correctly predicted each coin flipping outcome 26 times in a row. It stopped at 26 since this was when I stopped the coin flipping test. Midway, my friends thought that I was cheating somehow, so I let one of them do the coin flipping instead while I had my back facing them. This made no difference. I still gave the correct predictions.
So what’s the method???
dang, the double pendulum is a very talented artist
#HeyGoogle give me a heart!
Okay.