hello, di na kailangan mangurakot ni Villar, sobrang Yaman na yan. Bakit ba conflict of interest kaagad ang naiisip, give him chance to serve. i have a feeling he has this genuineness to serve our country. Kaya naman let's trust Mayor D's plan.
hahaha so pag mayaman na hindi na corrupt? Weh? Alam mo kasi yung iba kahit na mayaman na, patuloy pa rin ang pag exploit para mas dumami pa ang yaman. Talagang may conflict of interest dito kasi may real estate business sila. Hindi mo ata alam yung scandal dati yung C5 road extension ng tatay nyang si Manny V. Lahat ng extensio road haha mga real estate projs. nya ang nakinabang. Isa pa ano ba ang credentials ng anak nya to be a DPWH secretary? engineer ba sya or whatsoever? At tsaka kakahalal lang nya bilang congressman sa lugar nya. Hindi sya puedeng humawak ng dalawang puesto at the same time. Ang dapat nyang gawin ay mag take oath and mag resign. At dahil dyan, mag hahalal na naman ang lugar nya bg bagong congressman by conducting a special election dahil yun ang nakasaad sa constitution. Gagastos na naman yan ng mahigit 100 million para sa special election na yan. Delicadeza na man sana on the part of the Villars.
kwwa c mayor wl n tulugan my nagtatampo p dhil ung iba hnd nharap oh my god sna lalakas pac mayor dhil 6yrs p..umpisa plang nagtampo n ang iba..konting unawa nman nag iisa lng c mayor tulungan ntin xa pra s pilipinas
The Four Guiding-Principles of The Duterte Administration: 1. Kumain na ba kayo? (sustenance) 2. Nakapag-aaral ba mga anak ninyo? (education) 3. Pag nagkakasakit, nakakapag-pa ospital ba kayo? (health) 4. Hindi na ba kayo takot? (peace and order) Indeed, the Golden formula of successful Nations.
ganyan ang president. .. but doon sa dZMM sbi ng Anchor don kausap nya isang Professor dw yon nag pang LoCal ng ang mga Plano ni Duterte.. na inis ako doon
+Emong Mahal Many people, especially the intellectual snobs, easily brush-off the "simple" approach to management. They think that Pres.-edect Duterte's approach is so simple it couldn't work! That's what's wrong with many people - they complicate stuff and they don't want to go back to the basics so they get confused and lost along the way. Sustenance, Education, Health with Peace & Order; these four elements of National concerns are the pillars that must be tackled with and every other good things will follow! Thanks for your concern toward the progress of this Nation! Mabuhay ka.
sir gibo....long time no see.....mabuti anjan kasa listahan ni mayor....alam po namin makatolong ka kay mayor....salamat mayor si sir gibo napili mo...kahit kqmag anak ni panot yan ok yan binoto koyan dati....
great to see gibo again..i voted for him as president before..sad thing he lost..but i hope he'll accept the position because he's among the few good men in the government..he is for the people and the country👍
panglocal nman talaga ung guiding-principles ni duterte..pero won't u agree na PANGMASA lahat ang mga plano niya??nkakatuwa kasi ramdam nya ang paghihirap ng pilipino...godbless you mayor
Mike Anderson c villar magiging katuwang yan sa pagrelocate ng mga squatter at malaki ang kaalaman nya sa mga roads developmnt program..ayaw nyo yun kong sakali sa subdivision tayo lhat nkatira, wag lng substandard..hehehe
Wala pang presidente na nakaya na solusyonan ang problema sa krimen , druga at corrupt na politiko. Siya lang ang pag-asa namin para sa aming bansa. Para ma proud naman ako sa Pilipinas. DUTERTE is a good and effective leader. Nothing can change my opinion.
+ted benico, wag na palaging may calamities sating bansa, di bagay sa pinas. Bernard L. Cohen, Sc.D. Professor at the University of Pittsburgh Radiation The principal risks associated with nuclear power arise from health effects of radiation. This radiation consists of subatomic particles traveling at or near the velocity of light---186,000 miles per second. They can penetrate deep inside the human body where they can damage biological cells and thereby initiate a cancer. If they strike sex cells, they can cause genetic diseases in progeny. Radiation occurs naturally in our environment; a typical person is, and always has been struck by 15,000 particles of radiation every second from natural sources, and an average medical X-ray involves being struck by 100 billion. While this may seem to be very dangerous, it is not, because the probability for a particle of radiation entering a human body to cause a cancer or a genetic disease is only one chance in 30 million billion (30 quintillion). Nuclear power technology produces materials that are active in emitting radiation and are therefore called "radioactive". These materials can come into contact with people principally through small releases during routine plant operation, accidents in nuclear power plants, accidents in transporting radioactive materials, and escape of radioactive wastes from confinement systems. We will discuss these separately, but all of them taken together, with accidents treated probabilistically, will eventually expose the average American to about 0.2% of his exposure from natural radiation. Since natural radiation is estimated to cause about 1% of all cancers, radiation due to nuclear technology should eventually increase our cancer risk by 0.002% (one part in 50,000), reducing our life expectancy by less than one hour. By comparison, our loss of life expectancy from competitive electricity generation technologies, burning coal, oil, or gas, is estimated to range from 3 to 40 days. There has been much misunderstanding on genetic diseases due to radiation. The risks are somewhat less than the cancer risks; for example, among the Japanese A-bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there have been about 400 extra cancer deaths among the 100,000 people in the follow-up group, but there have been no extra genetic diseases among their progeny. Since there is no possible way for the cells in our bodies to distinguish between natural radiation and radiation from the nuclear industry, the latter cannot cause new types of genetic diseases or deformities (e.g., bionic man), or threaten the "human race". Other causes of genetic disease include delayed parenthood (children of older parents have higher incidence) and men wearing pants (this warms the gonads, increasing the frequency of spontaneous mutations). The genetic risks of nuclear power are equivalent to delaying parenthood by 2.5 days, or of men wearing pants an extra 8 hours per year. Much can be done to avert genetic diseases utilizing currently available technology; if 1% of the taxes paid by the nuclear industry were used to further implement this technology, 80 cases of genetic disease would be averted for each case caused by the nuclear industry. Reactor accidents The nuclear power plant design strategy for preventing accidents and mitigating their potential effects is "defense in depth"--- if something fails, there is a back-up system to limit the harm done, if that system should also fail there is another back-up system for it, etc., etc. Of course it is possible that each system in this series of back-ups might fail one after the other, but the probability for that is exceedingly small. The Media often publicize a failure of some particular system in some plant, implying that it was a close call" on disaster; they completely miss the point of defense in depth which easily takes care of such failures. Even in the Three Mile Island accident where at least two equipment failures were severely compounded by human errors, two lines of defense were still not breached--- essentially all of the radioactivity remained sealed in the thick steel reactor vessel, and that vessel was sealed inside the heavily reinforced concrete and steel lined "containment" building which was never even challenged. It was clearly not a close call on disaster to the surrounding population. The Soviet Chernobyl reactor, built on a much less safe design concept, did not have such a containment structure; if it did, that disaster would have been averted. Risks from reactor accidents are estimated by the rapidly developing science of "probabilistic risk analysis" (PRA). A PRA must be done separately for each power plant (at a cost of $5 million) but we give typical results here: A fuel melt-down might be expected once in 20,000 years of reactor operation. In 2 out of 3 melt-downs there would be no deaths, in 1 out of 5 there would be over 1000 deaths, and in 1 out of 100,000 there would be 50,000 deaths. The average for all meltdowns would be 400 deaths. Since air pollution from coal burning is estimated to be causing 10,000 deaths per year, there would have to be 25 melt-downs each year for nuclear power to be as dangerous as coal burning. Of course deaths from coal burning air pollution are not noticeable, but the same is true for the cancer deaths from reactor accidents. In the worst accident considered, expected once in 100,000 melt-downs (once in 2 billion years of reactor operation), the cancer deaths would be among 10 million people, increasing their cancer risk typically from 20% (the current U.S. average) to 20.5%. This is much less than the geographical variation--- 22% in New England to 17% in the Rocky Mountain states. Very high radiation doses can destroy body functions and lead to death within 60 days, but such "noticeable" deaths would be expected in only 2% of reactor melt-down accidents; there would be over 100 in 0.2% of meltdowns, and 3500 in 1 out of 100,000 melt-downs. To date, the largest number of noticeable deaths from coal burning was in an air pollution incident (London, 1952) where there were 3500 extra deaths in one week. Of course the nuclear accidents are hypothetical and there are many much worse hypothetical accidents in other electricity generation technologies; e.g., there are hydroelectric dams in California whose sudden failure could cause 200,000 deaths. Radioactive Waste The radioactive waste products from the nuclear industry must be isolated from contact with people for very long time periods. The bulk of the radioactivity is contained in the spent fuel, which is quite small in volume and therefore easily handled with great care. This "high level waste" will be converted to a rock-like form and emplaced in the natural habitat of rocks, deep underground. The average lifetime of a rock in that environment is one billion years. If the waste behaves like other rock, it is easily shown that the waste generated by one nuclear power plant will eventually, over millions of years (if there is no cure found for cancer), cause one death from 50 years of operation. By comparison, the wastes from coal burning plants that end up in the ground will eventually cause several thousand deaths from generating the same amount of electricity. The much larger volume of much less radioactive (low level) waste from nuclear plants will be buried at shallow depths (typically 20 feet) in soil. If we assume that this material immediately becomes dispersed through the soil between the surface and ground water depth (despite elaborate measures to maintain waste package integrity) and behaves like the same materials that are present naturally in soil (there is extensive evidence confirming such behavior), the death toll from this low level waste would be 5% of that from the high level waste discussed in the previous paragraph. Other Radiation Problems The effects of routine releases of radioactivity from nuclear plants depend somewhat on how the spent fuel is handled. A typical estimate is that they may reduce our life expectancy by 15 minutes. Potential problems from accidents in transport of radioactive materials are largely neutralized by elaborate packaging. A great deal of such transport has taken place over the past 50 years and there have been numerous accidents, including fatal ones. However, from all of these accidents combined, there is less than a 1% chance that even a single death will ever result from radiation exposure. Probabilistic risk analyses indicate that we can expect less than one death per century in U.S. from this source. Mining uranium to fuel nuclear power plants leaves "mill tailings", the residues from chemical processing of the ore, which lead to radon exposures to the public. However, these effects are grossly over-compensated by the fact that mining uranium out of the ground reduces future radon exposures. By comparison, coal burning leaves ashes that increase future radon exposures. The all-inclusive estimates of radon effects are that one nuclear power plant operating for one year will eventually avert a few hundred deaths, while an equivalent coal burning plant will eventually cause 30 deaths.
+ted benico masama sa atin yan maraming bagyo tumatama sa tin dito delikado.ang kailangan buhayin ni sir digs ay ang steel mill para mkagawa tayo nang sarili natin mga sasakyan at mga construction material para hindi na tayo ma import makakatipid ang pinas
wow ganda nang mga plano isang matibay na pundasyon yan para kahit pano matulo gan ang mga mahihirap sana magawa nang maayos thumps up ako dyan👍👍👍
kaya mo yan Mr. Pres Degong with all the prayer ano man mangyari
Para sa ating Presedente Duterte,GOOD LUCK AND GOD BLESS YOU.
daddy pahinga dn pg my tym... ;)
hello, di na kailangan mangurakot ni Villar, sobrang Yaman na yan. Bakit ba conflict of interest kaagad ang naiisip, give him chance to serve. i have a feeling he has this genuineness to serve our country. Kaya naman let's trust Mayor D's plan.
agreed wid u..who r these people to give a prejudge to our presumptive president? he haven't started his reign yet but gudness dami nang baratatat
hahaha so pag mayaman na hindi na corrupt? Weh? Alam mo kasi yung iba kahit na mayaman na, patuloy pa rin ang pag exploit para mas dumami pa ang yaman. Talagang may conflict of interest dito kasi may real estate business sila. Hindi mo ata alam yung scandal dati yung C5 road extension ng tatay nyang si Manny V. Lahat ng extensio road haha mga real estate projs. nya ang nakinabang. Isa pa ano ba ang credentials ng anak nya to be a DPWH secretary? engineer ba sya or whatsoever? At tsaka kakahalal lang nya bilang congressman sa lugar nya. Hindi sya puedeng humawak ng dalawang puesto at the same time. Ang dapat nyang gawin ay mag take oath and mag resign. At dahil dyan, mag hahalal na naman ang lugar nya bg bagong congressman by conducting a special election dahil yun ang nakasaad sa constitution. Gagastos na naman yan ng mahigit 100 million para sa special election na yan. Delicadeza na man sana on the part of the Villars.
Sana hindi makalusot si Villar. Lahat ng appointees ay dadaan sa Commission Appointment.
Goodluck Mayor & sa mga magiging cabinet members mo.Naway maging maayos at maganda ang pamamalakad nyo sa Pilipinas.
Ahon Pinas!!!
Godbls u me president 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
kwwa c mayor wl n tulugan my nagtatampo p dhil ung iba hnd nharap oh my god sna lalakas pac mayor dhil 6yrs p..umpisa plang nagtampo n ang iba..konting unawa nman nag iisa lng c mayor tulungan ntin xa pra s pilipinas
papa gibo you've changed in 6 years :-D
Goodluck Mr. President God is always Guide you
woi nakita ko si gov jonvic remulla idol koyan haaha
The Four Guiding-Principles of The Duterte Administration:
1. Kumain na ba kayo? (sustenance)
2. Nakapag-aaral ba mga anak ninyo? (education)
3. Pag nagkakasakit, nakakapag-pa ospital ba kayo? (health)
4. Hindi na ba kayo takot? (peace and order)
Indeed, the Golden formula of successful Nations.
ganyan ang president. .. but doon sa dZMM sbi ng Anchor don kausap nya isang Professor dw yon nag pang LoCal ng ang mga Plano ni Duterte.. na inis ako doon
May God guide Mr.Pres my prayer for all..thanks for support im from Dvo
Naiyak aq sa tuwa..ang plano nila ay matutupad na..
Emong Mahal oo nga sabi pang baranggay lang daw isip lang nya un.
+Emong Mahal Many people, especially the intellectual snobs, easily brush-off the "simple" approach to management. They think that Pres.-edect Duterte's approach is so simple it couldn't work! That's what's wrong with many people - they complicate stuff and they don't want to go back to the basics so they get confused and lost along the way. Sustenance, Education, Health with Peace & Order; these four elements of National concerns are the pillars that must be tackled with and every other good things will follow! Thanks for your concern toward the progress of this Nation! Mabuhay ka.
sir gibo....long time no see.....mabuti anjan kasa listahan ni mayor....alam po namin makatolong ka kay mayor....salamat mayor si sir gibo napili mo...kahit kqmag anak ni panot yan ok yan binoto koyan dati....
great to see gibo again..i voted for him as president before..sad thing he lost..but i hope he'll accept the position because he's among the few good men in the government..he is for the people and the country👍
One simple & touchable person able to fight elites politicians in our country to the max...for change... Du30
+Elaine de Dios Tanong ko lang bakit parang sikat si Gibo sa pinas?
panglocal nman talaga ung guiding-principles ni duterte..pero won't u agree na PANGMASA lahat ang mga plano niya??nkakatuwa kasi ramdam nya ang paghihirap ng pilipino...godbless you mayor
Galing namn ni du30. Dahil sa kanya, Sikat na sikat ngayon Ang Davao.... congrats Mayor at Presidente...
true
Where is d americans who will greet him and welcome him
Mike Anderson c villar magiging katuwang yan sa pagrelocate ng mga squatter at malaki ang kaalaman nya sa mga roads developmnt program..ayaw nyo yun kong sakali sa subdivision tayo lhat nkatira, wag lng substandard..hehehe
best of luck mayor du30,we wish u succeed
bakit nandyn hudas chavit ..
kaya nga la ako tiwala dyan eh mga anak nya sa ilocos puro LP
At eto na naman si Chavit Singson and the likes nagpapa sipsip. Kainis! Isa yan sa mga... Never mind.
DJ. Carmen
sino sa DILG?
I hope Ben tulfo👍👍👍👍👍
A very effective leader. Duterte
As a mayor, yes. But as president? Let us see.
Wala pang presidente na nakaya na solusyonan ang problema sa krimen , druga at corrupt na politiko. Siya lang ang pag-asa namin para sa aming bansa. Para ma proud naman ako sa Pilipinas. DUTERTE is a good and effective leader. Nothing can change my opinion.
+Dane Mitch no everyone is sure and your the only one not sure .!.
+Raian Mancha everyone? haha 16 million people out of 100 million population of our country. Don't generalize.
Dane Mitch bullshit not all registered voter use ur brain UNGGOY 😂😂😂
MR PRESIDENT SANA MABUHAY NIYO MULI ANG BATAAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NA ITINIGIL PAG UPO NI CORY
+ted benico, wag na palaging may calamities sating bansa, di bagay sa pinas.
Bernard L. Cohen, Sc.D.
Professor at the University of Pittsburgh Radiation
The principal risks associated with nuclear power arise from
health effects of radiation. This radiation consists of subatomic
particles traveling at or near the velocity of light---186,000
miles per second. They can penetrate deep inside the human body
where they can damage biological cells and thereby initiate a
cancer. If they strike sex cells, they can cause genetic diseases
in progeny.
Radiation occurs naturally in our environment; a typical
person is, and always has been struck by 15,000 particles of
radiation every second from natural sources, and an average
medical X-ray involves being struck by 100 billion. While this
may seem to be very dangerous, it is not, because the probability
for a particle of radiation entering a human body to cause a
cancer or a genetic disease is only one chance in 30 million
billion (30 quintillion).
Nuclear power technology produces materials that are active
in emitting radiation and are therefore called
"radioactive". These materials can come into contact
with people principally through small releases during routine
plant operation, accidents in nuclear power plants, accidents in
transporting radioactive materials, and escape of radioactive
wastes from confinement systems. We will discuss these
separately, but all of them taken together, with accidents
treated probabilistically, will eventually expose the average
American to about 0.2% of his exposure from natural radiation.
Since natural radiation is estimated to cause about 1% of all
cancers, radiation due to nuclear technology should eventually
increase our cancer risk by 0.002% (one part in 50,000), reducing
our life expectancy by less than one hour. By comparison, our
loss of life expectancy from competitive electricity generation
technologies, burning coal, oil, or gas, is estimated to range
from 3 to 40 days.
There has been much misunderstanding on genetic diseases due
to radiation. The risks are somewhat less than the cancer risks;
for example, among the Japanese A-bomb survivors from Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, there have been about 400 extra cancer deaths among
the 100,000 people in the follow-up group, but there have been no
extra genetic diseases among their progeny. Since there is no
possible way for the cells in our bodies to distinguish between
natural radiation and radiation from the nuclear industry, the
latter cannot cause new types of genetic diseases or deformities
(e.g., bionic man), or threaten the "human race". Other
causes of genetic disease include delayed parenthood (children of
older parents have higher incidence) and men wearing pants (this
warms the gonads, increasing the frequency of spontaneous
mutations). The genetic risks of nuclear power are equivalent to
delaying parenthood by 2.5 days, or of men wearing pants an extra
8 hours per year. Much can be done to avert genetic diseases
utilizing currently available technology; if 1% of the taxes paid
by the nuclear industry were used to further implement this
technology, 80 cases of genetic disease would be averted for each
case caused by the nuclear industry.
Reactor accidents
The nuclear power plant design strategy for preventing
accidents and mitigating their potential effects is "defense
in depth"--- if something fails, there is a back-up system
to limit the harm done, if that system should also fail there is
another back-up system for it, etc., etc. Of course it is
possible that each system in this series of back-ups might fail
one after the other, but the probability for that is exceedingly
small. The Media often publicize a failure of some particular
system in some plant, implying that it was a close call" on
disaster; they completely miss the point of defense in depth
which easily takes care of such failures. Even in the Three Mile
Island accident where at least two equipment failures were
severely compounded by human errors, two lines of defense were
still not breached--- essentially all of the radioactivity
remained sealed in the thick steel reactor vessel, and that
vessel was sealed inside the heavily reinforced concrete and
steel lined "containment" building which was never even
challenged. It was clearly not a close call on disaster to the
surrounding population. The Soviet Chernobyl reactor, built on a
much less safe design concept, did not have such a containment
structure; if it did, that disaster would have been averted.
Risks from reactor accidents are estimated by the rapidly
developing science of "probabilistic risk analysis"
(PRA). A PRA must be done separately for each power plant (at a
cost of $5 million) but we give typical results here: A fuel
melt-down might be expected once in 20,000 years of reactor
operation. In 2 out of 3 melt-downs there would be no deaths, in
1 out of 5 there would be over 1000 deaths, and in 1 out of
100,000 there would be 50,000 deaths. The average for all
meltdowns would be 400 deaths. Since air pollution from coal
burning is estimated to be causing 10,000 deaths per year, there
would have to be 25 melt-downs each year for nuclear power to be
as dangerous as coal burning.
Of course deaths from coal burning air pollution are not
noticeable, but the same is true for the cancer deaths from
reactor accidents. In the worst accident considered, expected
once in 100,000 melt-downs (once in 2 billion years of reactor
operation), the cancer deaths would be among 10 million people,
increasing their cancer risk typically from 20% (the current U.S.
average) to 20.5%. This is much less than the geographical
variation--- 22% in New England to 17% in the Rocky Mountain
states.
Very high radiation doses can destroy body functions and lead
to death within 60 days, but such "noticeable" deaths
would be expected in only 2% of reactor melt-down accidents;
there would be over 100 in 0.2% of meltdowns, and 3500 in 1 out
of 100,000 melt-downs. To date, the largest number of noticeable
deaths from coal burning was in an air pollution incident
(London, 1952) where there were 3500 extra deaths in one week. Of
course the nuclear accidents are hypothetical and there are many
much worse hypothetical accidents in other electricity
generation technologies; e.g., there are hydroelectric dams in
California whose sudden failure could cause 200,000 deaths.
Radioactive Waste
The radioactive waste products from the nuclear industry must
be isolated from contact with people for very long time periods.
The bulk of the radioactivity is contained in the spent fuel,
which is quite small in volume and therefore easily handled with
great care. This "high level waste" will be converted
to a rock-like form and emplaced in the natural habitat of rocks,
deep underground. The average lifetime of a rock in that
environment is one billion years. If the waste behaves like other
rock, it is easily shown that the waste generated by one nuclear
power plant will eventually, over millions of years (if there is
no cure found for cancer), cause one death from 50 years of
operation. By comparison, the wastes from coal burning plants
that end up in the ground will eventually cause several thousand
deaths from generating the same amount of electricity.
The much larger volume of much less radioactive (low level)
waste from nuclear plants will be buried at shallow depths
(typically 20 feet) in soil. If we assume that this material
immediately becomes dispersed through the soil between the
surface and ground water depth (despite elaborate measures to
maintain waste package integrity) and behaves like the same
materials that are present naturally in soil (there is extensive
evidence confirming such behavior), the death toll from this low
level waste would be 5% of that from the high level waste
discussed in the previous paragraph.
Other Radiation Problems
The effects of routine releases of radioactivity from nuclear
plants depend somewhat on how the spent fuel is handled. A
typical estimate is that they may reduce our life expectancy by
15 minutes.
Potential problems from accidents in transport of radioactive
materials are largely neutralized by elaborate packaging. A great
deal of such transport has taken place over the past 50 years and
there have been numerous accidents, including fatal ones.
However, from all of these accidents combined, there is less than
a 1% chance that even a single death will ever result from
radiation exposure. Probabilistic risk analyses indicate that we
can expect less than one death per century in U.S. from this
source.
Mining uranium to fuel nuclear power plants leaves "mill
tailings", the residues from chemical processing of the ore,
which lead to radon exposures to the public. However, these
effects are grossly over-compensated by the fact that mining
uranium out of the ground reduces future radon exposures. By
comparison, coal burning leaves ashes that increase future radon
exposures. The all-inclusive estimates of radon effects are that
one nuclear power plant operating for one year will eventually avert
a few hundred deaths, while an equivalent coal burning plant will
eventually cause 30 deaths.
+ted benico masama sa atin yan maraming bagyo tumatama sa tin dito delikado.ang kailangan buhayin ni sir digs ay ang steel mill para mkagawa tayo nang sarili natin mga sasakyan at mga construction material para hindi na tayo ma import makakatipid ang pinas
daghan na mga matay
ha??? makukulong na yan mag kakaroon na yan ng arrest warrant.
Bat andito si chavit eh hari nang mga hari nang mga anu to eh alam nyo na.