ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

TTArtisan 17mm F1.4 for APS-C Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this video I check out the new TTartisan 17mm F1.4 manual focus lens for Sony APS-C. It is sort of like a budget Sigma 16mm F1.4, but worse in every way possible.
    Check it out HERE: geni.us/WCFoj (use coupon code ARFREIENDS1 for an extra discount on all APSC lenses over $100 direct from TTartisan)
    M Y G E A R :
    Cameras -
    📷 WHAT I USE TO RECORD: geni.us/qEib
    📷 BACKUP CAMERA: geni.us/eWBG
    📷 BEST STARTER/BUDGET CAMERA: geni.us/Ujn1TC3
    📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$: geni.us/8PxAj
    Lenses -
    ❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: geni.us/BbGlnB
    ❤️ BEST PORTRAIT LENS: geni.us/bvwq
    ❤️ BEST ULTRAWIDE LENS: geni.us/ARXj
    ❤️ BEST DO-EVERYTHING LENS: geni.us/dDLwY
    ❤️ WHAT I FILM MY VIDEOS WITH: geni.us/ojGKI
    ❤️ MY FAVORITE CHEAP/MANUAL LENS: geni.us/cQoztp
    Accessories -
    🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES: geni.us/TXaeo3B
    🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: geni.us/L5dejj
    🎤 MICROPHONE: geni.us/O8UzW
    ⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: geni.us/4uf5
    ⚙️ BEST GIMBAL: geni.us/iYiy
    ⚙️ SD CARD: geni.us/7BhUrBj
    🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? geni.us/yn7t0 (Paid Amazon Link)
    🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: geni.us/ezoD (Paid Amazon Link)
    🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE: www.amazon.com/shop/technolog...
    👧🏼 MY WIFE'S TH-cam: goo.gl/P7D5RW
    🖼️ INSTAGRAM: / arthur213
    DISCLOSURES:
    I participate in the Amazon Affiliates Program, where I earn a small commission if you decide to purchase an item at no cost to you.
    I participant in the B&H Affiliates Program, an affiliate advertising program in which I earn commissions by linking to bhphoto.com at no cost to you.

ความคิดเห็น • 102

  • @ansonlan9858
    @ansonlan9858 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Instead of buying one expensive lens, I prefer buying several manual budget lens to play with, and i always check your review first, thanks for making these videos 😌

  • @johnherzel718
    @johnherzel718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It’s a fun little lens. I Use it frequently as a street/walk around lens on my M50. No complaints here. The price is right and I like it’s character. Sharpness isn’t everything. Nice review, thanks

  • @martin9410
    @martin9410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My camera is a Sony a7rii but still enjoy watching your videos even if they are for APSC. I was watching you when I first got the Sony a6500 before I went into full-frame, and never broke the habit. Been having fun with my new travel lens, the Tamron 28-200mm. Keep up the great videos and God bless!

  • @waidrogers4
    @waidrogers4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the reviews. They are always appreciated. If you you find value in it, a review of a Pentax 135mm f/2.8 on your crop sensor would be very nice. Have a good weekend!

  • @efficaciousuave
    @efficaciousuave 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    have been watching your videos from over the past few years. your wonderful son has really grown a lot. 😍. i still remember your video reviews ( i think it was for a6400) where your wife was still carrying him around in her arms 🤗nice review btw and keep more videos coming. a special request for your next video: any new gimbal, preferable the size of zhiyun m2 but stronger for vlogging available? thanks.

  • @daniel.francisco
    @daniel.francisco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "DJ Optical dropping another hit"-- HAHA I love that. The joke, not the imprint.

  • @romulosantos6733
    @romulosantos6733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I follow you for a very long time, and i love the videos, photos, and all effort you put into videos! Gonna leave a small positive critique, when testing new lenses, try to not overexpose, it will washout colors a lot, its always better to shoot half a stop underexposed, and recover a bit of shadows in lightroom, rather then overexpose and have it all white (sky / water / puddles/ backrounds(even skin looks faint)). Really would like to see that lens performing a bit in Underexposed setting (.5 to 2stops). Keep the good reviews!

  • @JPFilmmaker
    @JPFilmmaker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very fast review, i love it. ty, i already bought one but i came to check your opinion. love you channel.

  • @emilariff3137
    @emilariff3137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've previously looked at Sigma 16mm and 7Artisans 12mm but now I'm definitely eyeing on this lens!

  • @mwales2112
    @mwales2112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have been using the TT 35 1.4 and 50 1.2 and really enjoying them paired with my X-Pro3 the images are great... I have been thinking about picking this one up also...

  • @juaninbits
    @juaninbits 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much. How about the performance on low light?

  • @mirkoregina8733
    @mirkoregina8733 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I currently have a Pen-F and Sigma 30mm 1,4 and am very happy but unfortunately too big.
    I am interested in a bright compact lens mainly for street photography and I am undecided between the two TTartisan lenses 23mm 1,4 (plus compactness) and the 17mm (plus focal but less compact) what do you recommend? I would have doubts about their sharpness, to be picky, the potential that the two lenses have in post-production both with open and closed aperture.

  • @mazzfotovideo
    @mazzfotovideo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    compared with sony 16mm wich one its worse? thanks

  • @stephanweiskorn6760
    @stephanweiskorn6760 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent video!

  • @hk_200k
    @hk_200k 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review. How about using it for milky way? I am thinking about the nikon z version although I will prefer black while only silver is currently available.

  • @emilariff3137
    @emilariff3137 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, super noob question here. Since this lens uses a screw on type lens cap, will a typical pinch snap on lens cap work on this lens?

  • @DjimmyTrovy
    @DjimmyTrovy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Paying the extra $200+ dollars for the Sigma is more than worth it imo. This lens is legendary already.

    • @m4rcin847
      @m4rcin847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ive had Sigma 16. Its great but too expensive for a prime without stabilisation. Very good lens for a pro, but pros didnt use APSC.

    • @calvinatdrifterstudio8438
      @calvinatdrifterstudio8438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@m4rcin847 plenty of pros use APSC. It has many advantages over FF in many situations. The only advantage of ff is that the photos are fractionally cleaner and usually have better iso performance.

    • @no15minutecities
      @no15minutecities 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      snobby fanboi

    • @m4rcin847
      @m4rcin847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@calvinatdrifterstudio8438 Your answer just confirms what I wrote. Those "the only" advantages are selling points of FF.

    • @calvinatdrifterstudio8438
      @calvinatdrifterstudio8438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@m4rcin847 the advantages of FF aren't relevant unless you are shooting in very low light. However, the disadvantage of FF are clearly visible 24 hours a day. Furthermore, Fujifilm doesn't even make a ff camera. What next, only pros use medium format?

  • @nAcolz
    @nAcolz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was looking at your Sigma 16mm review and got sad because it's not available for Fuji X... So I am thinking about this lens now.

  • @LouisLuzuka
    @LouisLuzuka 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it worth it or just save up extra and get the 16mm f1.4 instead of trying to save money?

  • @snowhite1qazse4
    @snowhite1qazse4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ive bought his lens and it makes me more to appreciate photography

  • @homeboi808
    @homeboi808 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are your JPEGs just standard or do you any adjustments to the in-camera settings in regards to sharpness/contrast/saturation?

    • @opperbouwmeester
      @opperbouwmeester 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a very good question. I want to know it too.

  • @criztabs6264
    @criztabs6264 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the infinite focus accurate as 7artisans 7.5?

  • @juliananicole2708
    @juliananicole2708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good job!

  • @manolothe115
    @manolothe115 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can't you do a comparison of the Tamron 17-70 vs sony 16-55 G lenses I will appreciate

  • @PratapO7O1
    @PratapO7O1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This lens is definitely a keeper

  • @harisankarb4664
    @harisankarb4664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please review 7 Artisans 75mm f/1.25

  • @albertsmith9315
    @albertsmith9315 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I bought this lens (awaiting delivery) for one reason.... I want one non-focus by wire lens with a comprehensive set of DOF marks for zone focusing to use for street photography.
    I shoot Fujifilm and have the outstanding XF 16MM f/1.4 as well as the more petite f/2.8, but those lenses will "drift" off of the distance that I set for zone focused grab shots while walking around, and you won't see that since they have no external distance info.
    I'll be using the 17mm at at least f/8 and i already bought a wide-angle hood for it to cut down some flare, so this should fill the square that I bought it for.

    • @GamachePhoto
      @GamachePhoto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which lens hood did you get? @albertsmith

    • @albertsmith9315
      @albertsmith9315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GamachePhoto unfortunately to lens hood that I pre-bought from Amazon based on it being the correct 40.5mm thread and labeled as a wide angle hood did not work out. It was from FOTASY but the hood being a screw in type was just an angled cone, rather than the usual petaled hood for wide angles. It cut off the corners with severe vignetting. Had to remove it.

  • @SpuddyIRL
    @SpuddyIRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would this lens be like for streaming

  • @ArthurLevonyanEarthman
    @ArthurLevonyanEarthman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely agree with you

  • @NiloVelez
    @NiloVelez 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the review! I use a Samyang 18mm 2.8 on a a5100 + camlink as my daily-basis streaming cam. This sounds like a nice replacement that would let me save the Samyang for better uses.

    • @SpuddyIRL
      @SpuddyIRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      did you end up getting this lens ?

    • @NiloVelez
      @NiloVelez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SpuddyIRL yes, I did and it's great. 17mm f1.4 on APSC is a rough equivalent of 26mm f2 on 35mm, which is perfect for using it as a webcam.

  • @maqeel325
    @maqeel325 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good choice for Fuji video shooters. Save money. Good lens

  • @diotcorpse
    @diotcorpse ปีที่แล้ว

    What better meike or this?

  • @RawkustvOfficial
    @RawkustvOfficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I call those flaws character, gives it that vintage flavour I like 😋

  • @lukasfischer9227
    @lukasfischer9227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    First I was skeptical but I decided to order one myself. 0-regrets! The image quality is stunning and for me its all about the usability of the camera setup. The Sigma is better in every aspect besides the form factor which is crucial for travel photography. I can take this lens everywhere on my A6000. I took it to Nashville, Lake Superior and Chicago. Thats what makes this lens so good. One of the best everyday lenses for ASPC.

    • @iNavneet
      @iNavneet 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about video quality? I'm willing to buy it as a replacement of my Sony zve10 for video. Please tell about videos made by this 17mm LENS of TTARTISAN.

  • @olivershutterspeed
    @olivershutterspeed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Lens have to try this out for my sony a6000 photoshoots :D!

    • @TheGrantSystem
      @TheGrantSystem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This lens damaged my a6000 and I don't know what to do . Any recommendations ? whenever I take a picture the camera tells me " Camera error.Turn power off then on"

    • @opperbouwmeester
      @opperbouwmeester 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheGrantSystem That's not so nice. Have you tried resetting the camera?

    • @TheGrantSystem
      @TheGrantSystem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@opperbouwmeester resetting the camera by taking out the battery and putting it back in? yea, I tried that and still nothing. Is there another way of resetting the camera ?

  • @b-rock7233
    @b-rock7233 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there a 30mm lens of this flavor?
    Nice video. Love your channel.

    • @manichaean1888
      @manichaean1888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TTArtisans 35mm 1.4 or Kamlan 28mm 1.4. The first is cheaper, the second is better optically.

  • @geopapa80
    @geopapa80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Still waiting for that Kamlan 21mm 1.8 review .. I can't believe it you haven't reviewed it yet..

    • @manichaean1888
      @manichaean1888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I did not find a decent review on the internet and bought this lens anyway.
      I'm very happy with that. The lens is similar in many ways to 28 f/1.4 but wider. Worth every penny.

  • @iNavneet
    @iNavneet 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about video quality? I'm willing to buy it as a replacement of my Sony zve10 for video. Please tell about videos made by this 17mm LENS of TTARTISAN.❤❤❤
    Kindly reply I'm your subscriber ❣️♥️

  • @malikwu6444
    @malikwu6444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tamron 11 20 f2.8 review please!

  • @jarrad5244
    @jarrad5244 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much is it ?

  • @opperbouwmeester
    @opperbouwmeester 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another important difference is the smaller size of the TTartisans. Very nice and small.

  • @jasdeepsingh1812
    @jasdeepsingh1812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Don't like the lens but i like your reviews

  • @saliwanpl1832
    @saliwanpl1832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There is a good lens but wouldn't it be better to buy some vintage lens ??? There is really a lot to choose from. I'm just testing the helios 44-2 m42 mount 58 mm f2 but then I think there will be some carl zeis :)

    • @herrreinsch
      @herrreinsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      actually not really, because every vintage fast wide angle is very expensive. (I'm a huge vintage lens fan btw.:), but I also love these ultra cheap chinese lenses)

    • @arpitkumargahlot
      @arpitkumargahlot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nope. These Chinese lenses have more vibrant colors and usually Superior coatings. Vintage lens make sense only if it has a unique rendering, such as Petzval curvature. They are not good as direct replacements.

    • @maxhammick948
      @maxhammick948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Even dim wide angle vintage lenses are expensive. You get a great selection of 50mm and up lenses in vintage mounts, but not so much for wider ones

    • @aw614
      @aw614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      While vintage lenses are fun, but most aren't wide enough for crop sensor cameras unless you use a speedbooster.

    • @ThanhThanh-it1pm
      @ThanhThanh-it1pm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      this is 17mm lens. few of vintage lens had that focal length is not very cheap price because vintage lens made for FF 35mm film .

  • @KevinYadao
    @KevinYadao 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You sold me to lean on the sigma

  • @Ebu26
    @Ebu26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    *What is the black thing in front of the microphone?*

    • @AlejandroNitsch
      @AlejandroNitsch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pop filter (blocks wind gusts from plosive consonants like "p", "t", "k" etc)

    • @Ebu26
      @Ebu26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlejandroNitsch Oh ok, thanks 🙏

  • @MrFpjohn
    @MrFpjohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old rule when shooting Against the light - use a lens hood. Fine review of a good lens. FPJ

  • @FootballScoutsTV
    @FootballScoutsTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    is this better than the sony 16mm f2.8

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Almost any lens is better than the Sony 16mm.

    • @hanif_afa
      @hanif_afa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArthurR hi can you share information or possibly video about how this lens perform for landscape? video & photo? in very small aperture is it good and sharp?

  • @parranoic
    @parranoic 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Meike feeling betrayed 🥺 by the intro statement

  • @sumitkolisetty
    @sumitkolisetty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey man please get the 7ARTISANS 55mm MARK ii🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝

  • @sijilo
    @sijilo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its not t bad

  • @webtranche
    @webtranche 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If u need real wide = Samyang 14 mm f/ 2.8 + speedbooster or Samyang 14 mm f/ 2.8 + simple adapter => 2 in 1. Samyang 14 mm f/ 2.8 price only 200$ like new

  • @darrenhayward4340
    @darrenhayward4340 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mines a bit soft at 1.4

  • @leppo71
    @leppo71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Not an American, but I can't get my head around what it would be like to live in Florida. I mean, I'm still subscribed, but it must be nightmare fuel, right?

  • @markuslindseyphotography
    @markuslindseyphotography 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recognize lake Georgetown in the video.

  • @eaojnr
    @eaojnr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how does one say something is cheap? It is what it is because of lots of factors. We need to stop this thing called cheap, unless we have apples to apples comparison guys.... it is budget sensitive, not cheap!

  • @samwang5831
    @samwang5831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Instead of a Sigma you can have a bag of TTArtisans, it is a no-brainer to me

  • @kptalteamtv6084
    @kptalteamtv6084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First view, first comment...

  • @vicman1288
    @vicman1288 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does it do with Astrophotography?

    • @IliasKoureas
      @IliasKoureas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was wondering the same thing. I guess the chromatic aberration makes it pretty bad for this kind of job

  • @avavaviv1
    @avavaviv1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very unorthodox to have such a wide aperture for such a wide lens.

    • @shaexplr
      @shaexplr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Astrophotography

    • @rajeewabk4219
      @rajeewabk4219 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Low light performance

    • @Termidryna
      @Termidryna 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Viltrox is about to release 13 mm f/1.4

    • @StapediusReflex
      @StapediusReflex 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are quite a few wide angle, fast primes out there…

  • @AndrisLelisTravelChanel
    @AndrisLelisTravelChanel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    damm, why I took sony 16mm :(

  • @CommentRodent
    @CommentRodent 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The lens is pretty, in my opinion; TTartisans... good job, but the corner sharpness is pretty garbage.

  • @leftblank
    @leftblank ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is that house so grey. Is everyone ok?

  • @lmball
    @lmball 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t like the outlook, just too ugly

  • @spillybilly
    @spillybilly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    why is it so ugly though