Remember Australia vs india series Australia were 30-5 two times and still managed to score 300 plus every time Symonds scored century. Such was strength of that time, never seen any team on same level. Greatest team ever by a mile
@@raheelakhtar7 Even SL did. India did. SA did the same. NZ did too just before 2003 wc and everybody played vs AUS during the world cup but got trashed
@@gauravpandey5118 no ,because of the quality. And fastest and great bowlers,best batsman all in their peak. And also the way india played , destroying every team before getting destroyed to the most legendary odi team ever
@@dontfuckwiththewhatdon't you think that bowlers like McGrath, Brett Lee would have been slapped hard in today's pitches? I mean people are just delusional with nostalgia stuff. Hazlewood has almost perfect length as McGrath, even more pace and height. Still he gets slapped in today's pitches. Same with starc too . People just don't get out of the fact that today's player are even better sometimes look at sehwag he was great right? Now look at Rohit Sharma Rohit almost beats him in everything. Same with dale Steyn, he has much better stats than any so called vintage player with their short primes Out of context
@@dontfuckwiththewhat yes he would be great but not akhtar, he would just turn out to be another Shaun tait, or haris rauf in today's pitches, McGrath could get hit as Hazlewood great for tests but performs just a little less in one day or t20 tho they can bowl extremely well in the first overs but will get hit in those 40-50 over mark as the ball gets old, but Brett Lee I agreed, he is outstanding with his line and length, slower ones, cutters, he's best for all 3 formats . Wasim, zaheer, boult all are same category they can play any format ,the finest left arm bowlers ever.
@@Enchantedquillx2 yeah unfortunately for the nostalgia seekers that hurts. Its still true. Cricket is way more harder for bowlers now. You have to ball the perfect line and length to get a wicket. All those quick singles and unorthodox shots are a bigger pain in the back too. But mcgrath is better than hazelwood. Better seamer than him but with 4 5 mph lesser pace around 136 kph.
even with 311 target 40/2 in 12 overs bowl swinging like crazy inzi is missing every bowl he still praising inzamam like he gonna destroy everything single handedly
The target was 311 from 49 overs,you have added the current score to the total score which is incorrect. This is a match where Symonds scored a match winning 100 and Waqar was not allowed to bowl after he bowled a couple of beamers in one over to Symonds.
Those times? lmao 434 got chased down just 3 yr after this match Also how 451 doesn't guarantee you win nowadays? Tell me how many scored above 375 has been chased in ODIs in last 12 yrs of modern cricket? Ten? Five? Two? It's ZERO. 451 will 100% guarantee you win any day.
@@littlesunshine2378 yeah but prior to the chase in the same match the SF were like what's happening 😆 And the match is still a one in a life time oond
i stillremember a glorious six of Inzmam Ul Haq on the bowling of Glenn Macgrath in group match of world cup 1999 in headingley inzy hooked him and ball went on the roof top and in that inzy scorex 81 runs got man of the match and Pak scored 275 and Pak won that match by ten runs
That match you’re referring to was the last time Australia lost a match in World Cup till 2011 quarter finals. Zero matches lost in 2003 and 2007 world cups n also no loss till 2011 quarter finals against India 🇮🇳 Nightmare, spoilsports, dream snatchers, invincible, legendary, you name it, it suits them . Happy to have watched them dominate everything in cricket 🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@gokulneov Just a correction. After league stage of WC 1999, it was Pakistan again who broke Australia's winning streak in the league stage of WC 2011.
A great Aussie team in the 2003 world cup, India was the no 2 team in that world cup finally finishing the runner up, lost twice to them in 2003 world cup, once in the group stage and another in the finals
Agreed it was a good world cup where best two teams met. I believe no matter how bad the pitches, format, washed out matched etc the two best teams eventually end up in the finals and the best one wins. Greatest example is 2007 world cup with a pathetic format. Number 4 and 5 ranked India and Pakistan didn't get a place in Super 8 round. Still best teams Australia and Sri Lanka played the finals.
i dont care how many bowlers beat his records in future, but this kind of accurate and delivering same speed in every ball nobody will be able to ball like this consistently he is the greatest bowler of all time he had the cricket in him even at the time of retirement
0:36. Inzi in his mind, "I am seeing a juicy half volley outside my off stump, let me play an extra cover drive". Inzi lining up to play a cover drive. 0:37 Inzi in his mind. "What the fuck was that? How the fuck did it bounce like that?". Story of all batsmen facing the Pegeon. True champ.
He never bowled above 90mhp..was not a great swinger of bowl.. But that unrelenting line and length and ability to seam the bowl just enough and the bounce he got made him a nightmare for batsmen..
Mcgrath didnt have the pace. His average speed was between 135-140, in fact he was closer to 135. Thats medium pace at best. But boy did he have accuracy and game planning! McGrath is arguably the greatest fast bowler of the mid 90s and mid 2000 era. An absolute legend. No other bowler till date has matched his bowling accuracy and tactical planning. He planned hos deliveries for each batsman and it rewarded him handsomely.
Magrath was the master of bowling he gets early wicket and makes the opposition weaker psychology and the other bowlers Breat Lee Gillespie and Shane Watson throws fire 🔥 he was the backbone of the bowling department in One-day And Test cricket
he will never desperately go for Wickets.. just bowl the tight line and length, either he will get the wicket or mostly other side bowler will get the wicket... that is beauty of Glen Macrath, consistent bowler ..
Australian line up was nightmare. You could break the team into three and they would still win. Steve waugh Mark waugh Gilchrist Shane warne Glen mcgrath Ponting Symonds Bevan Gill spie Michael Hussedamien Martin
saurabh pork chopfart Right. Inzaman has a test average of 49.60, an ODI of average of 39.52 and a first class average of 50.10. Sure he's over-rated:) Just stop with the agenda and hate and simply appreciate cricket. And I haven't even been to Pakistan btw.
No matter if he gets hit for a boundary he never changes his line and length, and he was capable of disrupting the batting line up with the same strategy.
@@ronniep9272 'World Cups' happen only once every 4 years..For me,West Indies of 1970s and 80s were always the most dangerous ever..Cricket standard were also a bit higher in the 70s and 80s..
This is an artist at work. Keeps on hitting the same line and length again and again. You wake him up from his sleep and give him a ball. He for sure will deliver that ball hitting the top of off.
@@pachforon201 Exactly. What I reckon was so magnificent about McGrath was that, he could trouble anyone even in the absence of swing. His discipline in bowling that perfect line and added advantage of height made this legend unplayable. Mind that the batsman here #Inzamam, is one of the greatest.
@@kuntalghosh1 That's the stupidest analogy I've ever heard. Of course people won't call it the best era when they're "in the" middle of the said era. One can only compare when both eras conclude.
1999-2015(End of Sanga, Jayawardene, Dilshan, Misbah, Afridi, Clarke, Watson, Steyn, De Villiers, Kallis, Morkel, Trott, Pieterson etc) *Talking about their peaks as well.. I know Steyn, De Villiers etc retired after that.
This team was not only a nightmare for the opponents but also for the opponent fans.... Will never forget 2003 wc final, but im gald i was able to witness this australian era again.... Cricket was more about the passion for your country unlike today, its all about money.
@@OmgaduGuduru yeah then tell me why Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane can't buy a run. Or why all those new guys in England keep getting duck after duck after duck. I could pull up many more names, these are just the common ones. You could say for individual cases that their technique is flawed, for Hameed and Burns I'll accept that. For Pope and Crawley, not as much. Pujara and Rahane, they have over 10K test runs between them with the same technique, yet now they and even Kohli are struggling. These players aren't running after IPL contracts and T20 bang bang, their sole focus is test cricket. It's just really hard to bat, both due to pitches and teams having trios and quartets of quality bowlers. Whereas in times gone by you could often get through the opening bowlers and have a much easier time. Survive Ambrose and Walsh, your runs come much easier.
@Intelligent Dude ur team with all those legends got their ass kicked in group stage that world cup even Kenya reached semifinal u people got knocked out try to respect other country's players rather than talking bull shit
Ramiz said he(Inzy)has destroyed many quality bowling attacks..but he has struggled against Donald, Pollock, Warne, Lee . Has scored way too less in SA and Australia
That's true buddy. He struggled against most great fast bowlers of that era barring maybe Walsh and Ambrose. Only Sachin, Lara and Steve Waugh can claim to have played with a great degree of control against great bowlers of that era. McGrath-Sachin, Donald-Sachin and McGrath-Lara were battles to behold.
@@MrWaqar12 92 World Cup was generations ago..grow up ..and I don’t know which legend ur talking abt ?? I am not Indian cricket fan.. If Indian to my knowledge almost all legends have won the WC.. also here the discussion is on Test matches which men play ..
@@MrWaqar12 You fool. Inzi failed in entire WC. Only is the last two games he performed. Had Ramiz and your bowlers not performed you would have never won the cup. Also the rain against England saved your asses. Also, in the same WC a 19 year old Sachin won the Man of the match against your team. Out of 5 Wc matches against you he was Man of the match on 3 occasions. He fucked your team hard in all crucial games. Have you forgotten 2011 WC semis? Your people were scared to even catch the chances he gave. He was the tournament 2nd highest run getter in 2011 campaign. He is till date highest run scorer in World cups with average over 55. Your Inzi never performed in World cups after 92. Check facts before commenting.
@@gotimlol5318 but his most important contributions came in semis and finals of 1992....except that he had a decent 1999 world cup. Overall he was average by his standards.
@@vick122 look it's not true. He would struggle against razzaq, Murali later on, cronje, MCgrath has a solid record against Tendulkar. Even Lara could be vulnerable to McGrath. No doubt both took McGrath apart too
@@sugs1191 i think you are confusing between getting out to them with struggling against them. Tendulkar did get out to Crnje and Razzak a few times that does not mean he would struggle against them. Virat kohli struggled against Anderson in 2014 and previous tour because Anderson was both not letting him score and taking his wicket. Tendulkar never faced such an issue against any bowler.
On that time when Australia bats,, pitch is batting pitch
Australia bowls pitch is bowling pitch 🔥
Same feeling bro .
Aus is beast
Target is 311 is not bowling pitch
@@santoshagase9526 His joke went over your head 😂
@@SeekerAndLearner can the joke jump ? how can the joke go over someone`s head.
Defeating Australia in those days was like winning a war
A player like Saeed Anwar could have smashed him for sixes
@@BengaliManfromWB nice joke
@@Rohityadav_17 Even Ganguly smashed a six off McGrath
How u know how it feels after winning the war
@@15.6mviews9 😂😂😂😂
Remember Australia vs india series Australia were 30-5 two times and still managed to score 300 plus every time Symonds scored century. Such was strength of that time, never seen any team on same level. Greatest team ever by a mile
Defeating Australian teamin a odi match in that era was just like winning a world cup final.
Yes 100%
Nt only odi...also tst
Funnily enough, Pak had beaten them in Oz just before this WC (2-1)
@@raheelakhtar7 Pakistan is the worst team to ever visit Pakistan
@@raheelakhtar7 Even SL did. India did. SA did the same. NZ did too just before 2003 wc and everybody played vs AUS during the world cup but got trashed
What a WC it was!!! The best we have seen live...
1999 wc was best
why best world cup bcoz India reaches final...?
@@gauravpandey5118 no ,because of the quality. And fastest and great bowlers,best batsman all in their peak. And also the way india played , destroying every team before getting destroyed to the most legendary odi team ever
@@randomtrickspro8828 yes.. for me also 2003 world cup was more entertaining than 2011 world cup.
@@gauravpandey5118 😂😂.
Only 90s kids can understand this Australian Team.
Not 90s
2000s 😂😂😂
@@akbar2351 how plz explain
Exactly!
Lee
Piegeon
Kasprowich
Warne
Wooooooow
even 90s ppll are kids now lmao
N@@subhasishsahooOdisha21 ODIs win consecutively .16 test wins straight twice
Those are my favourite cricket days 🥺
This Man has never extra pace but picked up all wickets on his Perfection in Line and Length .....🐐 bowler ❤️🙌🏻
He didn't had pace that's why he was accurate. But bowlers who are fast 145+ and accurate too are just another level
@@dontfuckwiththewhatdon't you think that bowlers like McGrath, Brett Lee would have been slapped hard in today's pitches? I mean people are just delusional with nostalgia stuff. Hazlewood has almost perfect length as McGrath, even more pace and height. Still he gets slapped in today's pitches. Same with starc too . People just don't get out of the fact that today's player are even better sometimes look at sehwag he was great right? Now look at Rohit Sharma Rohit almost beats him in everything. Same with dale Steyn, he has much better stats than any so called vintage player with their short primes
Out of context
@@Enchantedquillx2 ikr. Tho Brett Lee would be a better bowler than McGrath If they played today. Steyn and wasim would still be at the top tho.
@@dontfuckwiththewhat yes he would be great but not akhtar, he would just turn out to be another Shaun tait, or haris rauf in today's pitches, McGrath could get hit as Hazlewood great for tests but performs just a little less in one day or t20 tho they can bowl extremely well in the first overs but will get hit in those 40-50 over mark as the ball gets old, but Brett Lee I agreed, he is outstanding with his line and length, slower ones, cutters, he's best for all 3 formats
. Wasim, zaheer, boult all are same category they can play any format
,the finest left arm bowlers ever.
@@Enchantedquillx2 yeah unfortunately for the nostalgia seekers that hurts. Its still true. Cricket is way more harder for bowlers now. You have to ball the perfect line and length to get a wicket. All those quick singles and unorthodox shots are a bigger pain in the back too. But mcgrath is better than hazelwood. Better seamer than him but with 4 5 mph lesser pace around 136 kph.
Cricket is not same anymore without Tony Greg commentary :(
lol ramiz raza was praising inzi continuously but he forgets who is bowling the best bowler of all time
even with 311 target 40/2 in 12 overs bowl swinging like crazy inzi is missing every bowl he still praising inzamam like he gonna destroy everything single handedly
Nice video. All spells of Brett Lee and Shoaib Akhtar from this 2003 world cup plz
Shane Bond, Brett Lee, Chaminda Vaas and Zaheer Khan performed very well in 2003 WC
Andy bichel
Don't forget him
@@hrwedsash but srinath and zaheer khan bowled very poorly in final especially srinath
He always knew how to swing ball from good length outside off even on dead pitches
A Target of 351 at those times were impossible to chase down.
Nowadays even 451 doesn't guarantee the win..
Even this Aussie side made 200 look miserable 🙌
The target was 311 from 49 overs,you have added the current score to the total score which is incorrect. This is a match where Symonds scored a match winning 100 and Waqar was not allowed to bowl after he bowled a couple of beamers in one over to Symonds.
Those times? lmao 434 got chased down just 3 yr after this match
Also how 451 doesn't guarantee you win nowadays?
Tell me how many scored above 375 has been chased in ODIs in last 12 yrs of modern cricket?
Ten? Five? Two?
It's ZERO.
451 will 100% guarantee you win any day.
@@bomdila Even this Aussie side looked clueless when SA smashed their way to chasing 438.
@@littlesunshine2378 yeah but prior to the chase in the same match the SF were like what's happening 😆
And the match is still a one in a life time oond
i stillremember a glorious six of Inzmam Ul Haq on the bowling of Glenn Macgrath in group match of world cup 1999 in headingley inzy hooked him and ball went on the roof top and in that inzy scorex 81 runs got man of the match and Pak scored 275 and Pak won that match by ten runs
That match you’re referring to was the last time Australia lost a match in World Cup till 2011 quarter finals.
Zero matches lost in 2003 and 2007 world cups n also no loss till 2011 quarter finals against India 🇮🇳
Nightmare, spoilsports, dream snatchers, invincible, legendary, you name it, it suits them . Happy to have watched them dominate everything in cricket 🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@gokulneov yes you are right
@@gokulneov
Just a correction.
After league stage of WC 1999, it was Pakistan again who broke Australia's winning streak in the league stage of WC 2011.
A great Aussie team in the 2003 world cup, India was the no 2 team in that world cup finally finishing the runner up, lost twice to them in 2003 world cup, once in the group stage and another in the finals
Agreed it was a good world cup where best two teams met. I believe no matter how bad the pitches, format, washed out matched etc the two best teams eventually end up in the finals and the best one wins. Greatest example is 2007 world cup with a pathetic format. Number 4 and 5 ranked India and Pakistan didn't get a place in Super 8 round. Still best teams Australia and Sri Lanka played the finals.
Ajkal ke cricket ka standard bohot gir chuka h
100% right...ipl somewhat responsible
i dont care how many bowlers beat his records in future, but this kind of accurate and delivering same speed in every ball nobody will be able to ball like this consistently he is the greatest bowler of all time he had the cricket in him even at the time of retirement
The thing about McGrath that stands out was he seemed to gain pace of the wkt smhow, not quite sure how he did that,
The most iconic Australian team ever ✅️
McGrath line and length was so consistent and accurate. McGrath set the standard for future bowlers.and now Bumrah and shami etc live examples..
McGrath amongst all time favorites
Best AUS jersey ever 🤩
genius glen mcgrath, superb fast bowler.
I can watch his bowling whole day
Gasping Bumra is the extraordinary at present ( From SRILANKA )
0:36. Inzi in his mind, "I am seeing a juicy half volley outside my off stump, let me play an extra cover drive". Inzi lining up to play a cover drive.
0:37 Inzi in his mind. "What the fuck was that? How the fuck did it bounce like that?".
Story of all batsmen facing the Pegeon.
True champ.
Another Brilliant Upload Keep It Up
He never bowled above 90mhp..was not a great swinger of bowl.. But that unrelenting line and length and ability to seam the bowl just enough and the bounce he got made him a nightmare for batsmen..
Look at his reaction, no ohh ahh or gesture to inzy, he knew in this over he owned inzy every ball he didn't have to gesture
Nightmare of all batsman
Upload more and more videos of shoiab bowling. Please
Great Aussie team and what a beautiful Dress they wore !!
Glein McGrath is da most dangerous bowler i hv ever seen in my life ☺
my favourite bowler Glenn Mcgrath and Brett Lee
…. And Shane Warne 🤷🏻♂️
Australians use Science in Cricket. India uses Pure Talent.
The best of bowler in cricket
Most beautiful joursey of australia
In 2003 & 2007 i still remember that Australian team was so strong that they didn't lose a single match in wc
He is all time legend
He is a legendary bowler.
Mcgrath didnt have the pace. His average speed was between 135-140, in fact he was closer to 135.
Thats medium pace at best.
But boy did he have accuracy and game planning!
McGrath is arguably the greatest fast bowler of the mid 90s and mid 2000 era. An absolute legend.
No other bowler till date has matched his bowling accuracy and tactical planning. He planned hos deliveries for each batsman and it rewarded him handsomely.
Best team on Cricket history.
Magrath was the master of bowling he gets early wicket and makes the opposition weaker psychology and the other bowlers Breat Lee Gillespie and Shane Watson throws fire 🔥 he was the backbone of the bowling department in One-day And Test cricket
Truly haunted batter
Inzi scored just 16 runs in the 2003 World Cup.
upload wasim Akram 5 for 28 vs Namibia 2003 world cup ball by ball
Superb over
Magnificent bowling
This phrases have become scares in cricket due to stupid T20
Dream team
Great bowling
All time great bowler McGrath
All time best 11 in cricket history..
indianna
Some say the '48 Aussies or '76 West Indies were the best.
he will never desperately go for Wickets.. just bowl the tight line and length, either he will get the wicket or mostly other side bowler will get the wicket...
that is beauty of Glen Macrath, consistent bowler ..
2000-10 Australia was nightmare for any other team
Maintaining line & length with temperament.
Good Video G.
The same bowler was hit for six 4's in an over by Abdur razzaque... Two sides of a same coin
Five 4's
He is lethal weapon of aussy
I always think that he used to measure cricket pitch in inches with the ball.
Australian line up was nightmare. You could break the team into three and they would still win.
Steve waugh
Mark waugh
Gilchrist
Shane warne
Glen mcgrath
Ponting
Symonds
Bevan
Gill spie
Michael Hussedamien Martin
Inzamam struggling on a pitch where AUSTRALIA got 300 +
While Inzy was a good batsman, no doubt, but he is certainly over-rated.
saurabh pork chopfart
Right. Inzaman has a test average of 49.60, an ODI of average of 39.52 and a first class average of 50.10. Sure he's over-rated:)
Just stop with the agenda and hate and simply appreciate cricket. And I haven't even been to Pakistan btw.
Great bowler
Best cricket team ever
Of course i talking about Australia
2003 and 2007 world cups for inzimam Were night mares
This Australia are world class
Nobody can match the quality of Macgrath, the greatest bowler ever
Pehle sala cricket hota tha yar..maza aata tha..ab to sirf commercial lagta h
That time Australia was a best team in the world all players are legends
Simply superb ✊
it was unbeaten Australia of Steve Waugh
My favourite player=
Bestman= Rahul Dravid
Bowler= Glenn McGrath
All rounder= Jeck Kellis
If the ball was behaving this much in bowler's favour, then why was the target 311 ???
Anyone ???
He looks like Arnold Schwarzenegger
Inzimam ul haq scored a grand total of 20-30runs in that entire tournament
This Aussie side was a nightmare. All of them were legends. They just didn't lose!
not that they do now after their bad period is over
Except Harve
@@shauryaanand4178 unless they're facing India.
@@moeedkhan7396 talking about today's teams not 20 years ago, also that was a joke
@@anweshchatterjee7595 sorry brother......am deleting my comment...
This Australian side was invincible
Yeah absolutely agree 👍
The best team to ever walked on a planet called ----Earth
Yes
I disagree
Even
Bangladesh defeated them in 2005 and they scraped through against Sri Lanka and England in 2003 world cup
How fast he finished his over like a spin bowler. Today's generation definitely should learn from him.
That too bowling his 7th over on the trot
No matter if he gets hit for a boundary he never changes his line and length, and he was capable of disrupting the batting line up with the same strategy.
Probably the greatest ODI team of all time.
West Indies of 1970s and 80s
@@pras2429 yes
You forgot west indies of 70s nd 80s
@@pras2429 they outdid the West Indies. 4 World Cup finals in a row and won 3 of them.
@@ronniep9272 'World Cups' happen only once every 4 years..For me,West Indies of 1970s and 80s were always the most dangerous ever..Cricket standard were also a bit higher in the 70s and 80s..
This is an artist at work. Keeps on hitting the same line and length again and again. You wake him up from his sleep and give him a ball. He for sure will deliver that ball hitting the top of off.
And swing....n talent....
@@pachforon201 Exactly. What I reckon was so magnificent about McGrath was that, he could trouble anyone even in the absence of swing. His discipline in bowling that perfect line and added advantage of height made this legend unplayable. Mind that the batsman here #Inzamam, is one of the greatest.
Andre Russell can hit him with brute power 😍
Dont forget bounce and nip off the wicket both ways...lot of bowlers bowl the off stump line and in that corridor..but are not that effective..
@@deep152deep Nice joke 😂🤣
This guy was the Rolls Royce of fast bowlers. Lethal in every condition, troubled the greatest of batsmen. Hats off to you Glenn McGrath.
He wasn't Fast lol
@@sugs1191 yes he was
@@glennarcher6 not really
@@sugs1191 go and face someone bowling 130+ kms an hour and get back to me
@@anirudhsuresh4481 I guarantee you would struggle to get bat on ball at that pace😉
This Aussie jersey was the halloween costume for all the rest of the teams🤣
Gazabh bhai ghazabh 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👹👹👹👹
Easily the best fast bowler... Glenn McGrath is phenomenal ❤️
Hell no. Wasim? Waqar, Donald?????
@@ankanhazra9189 stats do not reflect everything, bro. McGrath only had the accuracy. The above-mentioned bowlers had a much better pace and a swing
@@chamikadesilvadepura7818 still McGrath was highest wkt taker among them all with better avg and economy
@@ankanhazra9189 only slightly
@@chamikadesilvadepura7818not slightly but by large margin except Akram and donald
Golden period of cricket!
But Only for Australian .
@@piyushgolatkar7571 no it was golden period for cricket coz every team that played world cup at that time they had legends
@@akhileshrmadhyastha6400 ha even that's true 🔥🔥🔥🔥.
Is it??I remember in 2003 people said that the golden period was the 70s and 80s
@@kuntalghosh1 That's the stupidest analogy I've ever heard. Of course people won't call it the best era when they're "in the" middle of the said era. One can only compare when both eras conclude.
Australian team under Ponting's captaincy were a nightmate for rest.
See the bowling speed was like 132 -134 kmph, still those deliveries were unplayable
1998-2013 greatest era of cricket
True
1998-2011
2007-2020 greatest era of cricket
1999-2015(End of Sanga, Jayawardene, Dilshan, Misbah, Afridi, Clarke, Watson, Steyn, De Villiers, Kallis, Morkel, Trott, Pieterson etc) *Talking about their peaks as well.. I know Steyn, De Villiers etc retired after that.
@@mohsinmasood2296 trott?😂
This team was not only a nightmare for the opponents but also for the opponent fans.... Will never forget 2003 wc final, but im gald i was able to witness this australian era again.... Cricket was more about the passion for your country unlike today, its all about money.
Art : Bowling
Artist : Glenn McGrath
what an over, 3rd one going outside and 4th one going in, modern era bowlers can just dream about it.
Today dead pitches are made. Even top bowlers would fail in pitches that are made today. Cricket has become a one sided batsmans game.
@@aqteaching do you even watch test cricket? Have you seen the averages of batsmen? This is the toughest batting era in decades.
@@anweshchatterjee7595 That's because Players who don't have patience and technique are playing today. Not because of great pitches.
@@OmgaduGuduru yeah then tell me why Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane can't buy a run. Or why all those new guys in England keep getting duck after duck after duck. I could pull up many more names, these are just the common ones. You could say for individual cases that their technique is flawed, for Hameed and Burns I'll accept that. For Pope and Crawley, not as much. Pujara and Rahane, they have over 10K test runs between them with the same technique, yet now they and even Kohli are struggling. These players aren't running after IPL contracts and T20 bang bang, their sole focus is test cricket. It's just really hard to bat, both due to pitches and teams having trios and quartets of quality bowlers. Whereas in times gone by you could often get through the opening bowlers and have a much easier time. Survive Ambrose and Walsh, your runs come much easier.
Lmao what? Have you heard this 40 yr old guy named Jimmy. He can do that swing much better on the flat roads of Pakistan.
Such fantastic bowler Gleen McGrath was💥💯⚡
ramiz raja trying to make pakistani players good players in his commentary
They are❤️
@Intelligent Dude ur team with all those legends got their ass kicked in group stage that world cup even Kenya reached semifinal u people got knocked out try to respect other country's players rather than talking bull shit
@@jokerWhatsAppstatusThey loss match against USA
Line, Length, Accuracy, off the pitch movement masterclass from Pigeon...
Why was his nick name pigeon
@@Kobebryant5947 Mike hussey said in an interview that Glenn Mcgrath bcz of his long legs.
One need utmost level of discipline and hardwork to achieve God level accuracy like McGrath
In CWC 2003, this great Aussie side bounced back from some very difficult situations such as this match (Symonds) and later against England (Bichel).
Ramiz said he(Inzy)has destroyed many quality bowling attacks..but he has struggled against Donald, Pollock, Warne, Lee . Has scored way too less in SA and Australia
That's true buddy. He struggled against most great fast bowlers of that era barring maybe Walsh and Ambrose. Only Sachin, Lara and Steve Waugh can claim to have played with a great degree of control against great bowlers of that era. McGrath-Sachin, Donald-Sachin and McGrath-Lara were battles to behold.
@@deepaksurana1996 true Inzy averages a poultry 30 and 31 against RSA & Australia in their respective countries....
Kids cry to ur mama.inzi won 92 wc all by himsrlf. Ur so called legnd tendi played 0 in big matches
@@MrWaqar12 92 World Cup was generations ago..grow up ..and I don’t know which legend ur talking abt ?? I am not Indian cricket fan.. If Indian to my knowledge almost all legends have won the WC.. also here the discussion is on Test matches which men play ..
@@MrWaqar12 You fool. Inzi failed in entire WC. Only is the last two games he performed. Had Ramiz and your bowlers not performed you would have never won the cup. Also the rain against England saved your asses. Also, in the same WC a 19 year old Sachin won the Man of the match against your team. Out of 5 Wc matches against you he was Man of the match on 3 occasions. He fucked your team hard in all crucial games. Have you forgotten 2011 WC semis? Your people were scared to even catch the chances he gave. He was the tournament 2nd highest run getter in 2011 campaign. He is till date highest run scorer in World cups with average over 55. Your Inzi never performed in World cups after 92. Check facts before commenting.
Amazing rivalry between this 2..........Aus vs Pak @ Johanisburg........Best match of WC 2003
One of the World's Finest Bowlers Ever 👍👍👍
Great McGrath
2003 wc and 2007 wc..combined inzi scored 150 runs max
100 runs
He was a flop in world cups. Averaged 24.
@@gotimlol5318 except work 92 wc sf
@@gotimlol5318 but his most important contributions came in semis and finals of 1992....except that he had a decent 1999 world cup.
Overall he was average by his standards.
From what I've seen only Aravinda could Handle McGrath regularly nobody else.
Sachin as well
@@vick122 no Sachin struggled against McGrath. Although he did dominate on occasion.
@@sugs1191 there is no bowler in the world against whom Sachin struggled , the same is true for Lara as well.
@@vick122 look it's not true. He would struggle against razzaq, Murali later on, cronje, MCgrath has a solid record against Tendulkar. Even Lara could be vulnerable to McGrath. No doubt both took McGrath apart too
@@sugs1191 i think you are confusing between getting out to them with struggling against them. Tendulkar did get out to Crnje and Razzak a few times that does not mean he would struggle against them. Virat kohli struggled against Anderson in 2014 and previous tour because Anderson was both not letting him score and taking his wicket. Tendulkar never faced such an issue against any bowler.