insightful, and frustrating. if you consider requests: break down how people in the UK looking to better their 'quality of life' via FE are overlooked.
I know property investors who have been offered exceptionally lucrative contracts to house migrants all over the UK. The deal offered to Landlords is so good it's hard for them to turn down. The government has essentially written a blank cheque to ensure these illegal migrants are housed.
A hotel owner in our town said he gets several calls every week from agents trying to persuade him to turn the hotel over for use by illegal immigrants.
If this is true then the UK is truly a broken society. Government has turned into a kind of kleptocracy where special interests feed off both the UK taxpayers and the suffering of migrants. As noted the aging population of the UK makes this an even more complicated question.
The other day, I wanted to apply for asylum. I do have the same basis for asylum as the Arabs from Gaza and Judea, my ancestors were forced to leave after WW2. The government clearly states on their website: " Your claim might not be considered if you: - are from an EU country - travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’ - have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum " Based on this, if the UK had rule of law, not a single asylum seeker is supposed to be here from France. The failed state of the UK is unable to enforce its own rules.
@@tmoosy, forced labour for the able-bodied, penalties and fees to be paid by the French government for not enforcing what they are paid to go and proper patrolling of the coasts (let's be honest: it is rather lax now), with serious consequences for all the people involved, from small thugs leading the small boats up to the social workers coaching people on how to lie to get asylum requests. Oh, and definitely cut the shower of freebies gifted to whoever comes here breaking the law (all the while the UK makes life as hard as they can to whoever wants to come here to work or marry a productive person). How does it sound?
If anyone could do the forensic accounting, we would no doubt learn that dozens of Baroness Mones are profiting from asylum-seeker-related contracts. Unfortunately though, the company shareholdings will go directly into opaque accounts in the Caymans, Turks & Caicos, Jersey, etc, so we cannot find out identities or amounts. The UK set up that system and it hides billions in otherwise taxable income. Sad.
Stop with the lies about foreigners filling labour gaps at this time migration from Britain to Canada , Australia and New Zealand was being actively encouraged both my and my wife’s family nearly emigrated to Australia. We never needed , voted for and were never asked for the multicultural hellhole that we have today. This was all due to business having to pay higher wages , first they encouraged women into the workplace which demographically has been disastrous for us and then to suppress wages even further they opened the floodgates to make us the new Balkans . This was still not enough for business so they outsourced our industries to keep the profits going while the indigenous were left with the mess we have today which has only 2 outcomes.
Dont understand why UK don't have bilateral agreements with friendly Allies like US, CA, AU, NZ...to make it easy for their educated/skilled or wealthy migrants to move to. Kinda like an Anglo Union-Lite Instead of taking migrants from dangerous and poor/unfriendly countries.
If you have the right skills, there are existing pathways to migrate to places like Canada and Australia. Quite a lot of people are doing it. That really doesn't have anything to do with the UK's asylum claims backlog though.
@@frmcf I dunno maybe they love English football, Harry Potter and so on. UK is more liveable than Canada, smaller and easier to get around. Healthcare is less crazy than in USA too
Whilst the common narrative is that migration into the UK after the war was due to labour shortages and it enhanced our culture, I would question both. The dilution of any culture does not enhance it, it just changes it. The people just came seeking better lives for themselves; they had the status of being British subjects just like native people, and transport links had developed to a degree that it became possible to more and more people. Britain would have easily got by without immigration, the impact of the wars on the population was nowhere near as bad percentage wise as plagues of earlier centuries. Indeed, whilst all this was going on native British people were being enticed to emigrate to Australia (assisted passage migration scheme). The disturbing thing about this video is that it demonstrates the power of messaging (or perhaps propaganda, depending on your perspective).
There is another factor that is more worrying: a lot of facilities are hardly going to be usable to host tenants or guests after having been left in that business for a few years; even on a smaller scale, I was living in a place a couple of years ago where the landlords panicked during Covid and thus accepted a contract from some agency of social "workers" (spoiler: they don't really work at all) to host "troubled youth". Well, fast forwards 2 years and they got tons of damage, normal tenants fleeing away and no joy in sight at the end of the tunnel: they will have to invest a lot to make those flats viable again to ordinary people.
Also, it sure as shit wouldn't cost the UK anywhere near 5 billion a year to build a fleet of small and medium sized boats to patrol the channel for a year until it dies down and people stop coming, just one year, that, vs this catastrophic situation they've brought on because the UK is a small place. I keep hearing about this but no one actually does anything. The UK, a people known for boats, should build a fleet equipped with very sensitive radar, and patrol that channel for a year. That's it. That's all they had to do.
The problem is that if you have hundreds of thousands of people enter the country illegally it’s either leave them to the street or turn to other methods that shady people are going to capitalise on it. Long term solutions are going to take years to build (you can’t just create asylum centres over night) and unfortunately the arrivals keep coming. If we can’t even house people that we have adding that burden will push it to the limit. Honestly I struggle to see a short term solution to this…
The government could bring out a law tomorrow that officially you are an asylum seeker in a neighbouring country only , if you move from that country you become an economic migrant and will be immediately deported. You must make your own mind up why they don’t but it could be incompetence, being too nice or they actually want it. If they want it there can only be two reasons, 1. It is to suppress wages or 2. To replace the indigenous people, my opinion is the second one.
Again one more scandal will come out , home office raised all fees which will help more asylum seekers already in uk as they go into sponsorship visa where companies will bear all exp results in increase in employment costs and less in profits. Evasion of tax . hmrc is shit and UK
This is it, this is why we have immigration. Its purely business. Do you think a socialist, socially conservative system could work in resolving the problem?
that's what we have had ever since the end of WW2 so no it does not work it always leads to communism which is what we have right now we need an Ethno Nationalist government that only takes care of their own ethnic groups.
That's why what we need is a LIMIT of how much money you can get privately or as a family. Otherwise that's what we get, few people becoming billionaires at the expense of entire countries or on the back of the people!!!! Jail all billionaires, confiscate their money and wake them work minimum wage!
I have no problem with someone becoming a billionaire in their lifetime but when they die their assets and money should be seized by the state with a large deduction of say a £1 million to each of their children. This would stop dynasties forming of out of touch narcissists and help the taxpayers, unfortunately unlikely to happen unless it was agreed worldwide. I think a better solution would be a turnover tax on businesses where the money they earn in a country is taxed by that country, this would stop the corporations tax being filtered by certain countries like Ireland and the money earned would go back to benefit the country it was earned in.
@pincermovement72 but you have a clear example in a video right here, that in order to get those billions, you literally destroy the country for everyone else. And there's almost 3k billionaires in the world, imagine how they all destroy our lives on daily basis to get that money. People decades ago had cheaper rent, food and cost of living in general. Everything they bought, lasted for years and they didn't have to buy electronics every 2-3 years or spend ridiculous amounts of money on repairs. That's because there were fewer billionaires in the past. Now you have billionaires literally changing policies in foreign countries to fit their business model at cost of locals and local small businesses. Everything that's evil around you is because of greed. And if someone wants to be a billionaire and actively works towards it, he does it at cost of all others. These people are evil to the core.
I will just comment to say that the labour shortages myth stated at 2:25 is fictious. in fact during the windrush period hundreds and thousands of brits left the uk (mostly to canada and australia because of a lack of work oppotunites in the UK. We didn't have enough jobs for our population and yet we still brought in immigrants.
It also doesn't help that the previous govt effectively banned asylum cases from being processed, so more and more people got stuck, so more and more beds were needed. Hopefully, the current mob won't be so idiotic.
They aren't asylum seekers. Most of these people go through 3+ safe countries to get here. They're economic migrants (mostly men) who are looking to cash in on better markets and welfare systems. We need to recognize them as such.
The real question is why the government kept this going and allow boats to keep coming. Could it be making people in the government make money as well, because it seems the only looser is the taxpayer
IF THE NAVY WAS ANY GOOD THE WOULD BE ABLE TO STOP THE BOATS WITH DRONES AN D MARINE WALLS TO KEEK THEM ON THE FRENCH SIDE MAY BE THE NEED TO GET THE UKRANES IN TO SHOW THEM HOW
Interesting video and well presented. I do take issue with what you stated at 12.05 "Echo the trauma they fled." They left France. It isn't a traumatic place. It is safe place in which to claim asylum. Anything that happened, or didn't happen before landing in mainland Europe is irrelevant.
Simple solution - let taxpayers make a declaration in their annual tax assesements how much each person is willingly allowinh the govermnment to spend on immigration - government make a limited fund out of it, calculates how much immigrants it can house in given year for that money and don't take any more immigrants above that threshold.
Your preface introduction here is completely wrong. In the 1950s we were not facing labour shortages they were businesses did not want to pay the wages that were being requested by low wage workers. If you look back at that time period there was a massive push of anti-immigration. There has never been a request for immigration to the UK. It has only been the government policy to do so for large businesses to suppress wages. Every single government since the war has had a promise in their manifesto to lower immigration.
If someone really thinks we should help illegal immigrants, I’d suggest they take some into their own home instead of expecting everyone else to pay for it!!!
@@kookoopoo7951 If you think about it, you’ll realize that bureaucrats can’t do anything more. They’ll spend more money, and the situation would only worsen. You can’t beat physics.
I'm sorry but why are you blaming business, who are of course only in it for the money, like all businessmen - as a purported 'economics' channel you should know this - for *POLITICAL* failure, cowardice and stupidity of successive Westminster governments who have encouraged this situation to continue. The Clearsprings is innocent. He's just a scapegoat. Blame Blair, Cameron, Johnson, Starmer etc.
England was always a wealthy country if you can be bothered to read history which is why it was invaded so much and I would question did our empire make us wealthy or did it make the ruling elite wealthy only ? The poor always had a comparable decent standard of living compared to our European brothers usually because war on our land was rare unlike the continent. Revenues still come from far off countries because we have the city of London financial system which provides 40% of our tax revenue.
Get started with Odoo for free today: www.odoo.com/r/Fv5H
insightful, and frustrating.
if you consider requests: break down how people in the UK looking to better their 'quality of life' via FE are overlooked.
I know property investors who have been offered exceptionally lucrative contracts to house migrants all over the UK. The deal offered to Landlords is so good it's hard for them to turn down. The government has essentially written a blank cheque to ensure these illegal migrants are housed.
You miss spelled Asylum seekers***
@@fahadmajid2214 You misspelled, misspelled.
😂😂😂
@@fahadmajid2214It is spelled ‘illegal immigrants’
A hotel owner in our town said he gets several calls every week from agents trying to persuade him to turn the hotel over for use by illegal immigrants.
It can be done over night.Trump has just proved it.
He wont. Just wait and watch.
The Royal Navy can stop the boats, but only of they want to.
If this is true then the UK is truly a broken society. Government has turned into a kind of kleptocracy where special interests feed off both the UK taxpayers and the suffering of migrants. As noted the aging population of the UK makes this an even more complicated question.
So true it’s easy to hate on migrants when the true enemy is the hidden corruption of our capitalist government
The other day, I wanted to apply for asylum. I do have the same basis for asylum as the Arabs from Gaza and Judea, my ancestors were forced to leave after WW2.
The government clearly states on their website:
"
Your claim might not be considered if you:
- are from an EU country
- travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’
- have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum
"
Based on this, if the UK had rule of law, not a single asylum seeker is supposed to be here from France.
The failed state of the UK is unable to enforce its own rules.
No worries, they overcompensate by enforcing draconian laws on the slightest objection from any dissenter.
how do you propose we get rid of them once they're here?
@@tmoosy, forced labour for the able-bodied, penalties and fees to be paid by the French government for not enforcing what they are paid to go and proper patrolling of the coasts (let's be honest: it is rather lax now), with serious consequences for all the people involved, from small thugs leading the small boats up to the social workers coaching people on how to lie to get asylum requests.
Oh, and definitely cut the shower of freebies gifted to whoever comes here breaking the law (all the while the UK makes life as hard as they can to whoever wants to come here to work or marry a productive person).
How does it sound?
Most of those coming from France are relatives of asylum granted residents in The UK I believe and so they can also apply for asylum legally.
This doesn't address the fortunes made by legal firms from legal aid.
It's the same with "foreign aid". It goes to contractors.
If anyone could do the forensic accounting, we would no doubt learn that dozens of Baroness Mones are profiting from asylum-seeker-related contracts. Unfortunately though, the company shareholdings will go directly into opaque accounts in the Caymans, Turks & Caicos, Jersey, etc, so we cannot find out identities or amounts. The UK set up that system and it hides billions in otherwise taxable income. Sad.
THE QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING IS WHO OWNS THOSE 3 COMPANIES? LOOK DEEP INTO ALL INDIVIDUAL!!!
Oy vey
@@IloveTide1997they aren't even Jews lol?
@@wentoneisendon6502 Muslims
@@IloveTide1997donkey. Does Graham king sound Jewish to you? 🤡 🤡 🤡
@ its just a joke. I know that the vast majority of the people responsible for this are not jews
I was born in the uk but left and have a far better life abroad in both standards of living and wages. Not sure people would want to go to the uk…
In Jamaica and the Caribbean , we see UK as more advanced ?wealthier and full of opportunities.
Where did you go? Asking for a friend lol
@@peterbanks3664Guernsey, although Jersey would have been better
@@Adam-zz1tithose are crown dependencies, so in reality they’re part of the UK
Stop with the lies about foreigners filling labour gaps at this time migration from Britain to Canada , Australia and New Zealand was being actively encouraged both my and my wife’s family nearly emigrated to Australia. We never needed , voted for and were never asked for the multicultural hellhole that we have today. This was all due to business having to pay higher wages , first they encouraged women into the workplace which demographically has been disastrous for us and then to suppress wages even further they opened the floodgates to make us the new Balkans . This was still not enough for business so they outsourced our industries to keep the profits going while the indigenous were left with the mess we have today which has only 2 outcomes.
Why the hate towards the Balkans ?
I thought they brought women into the workforce because they wanted the people to pay more tax.
Excellent video - great work!
It's always about the money. Evil!
These CEO’s need the italian stallion treatment
Put them on the ring with Rocky? That would be fun, actually 🤔
@@GiacomoSorbi I was thinking of somebody else who recently visited NYC actually
Dont understand why UK don't have bilateral agreements with friendly Allies like US, CA, AU, NZ...to make it easy for their educated/skilled or wealthy migrants to move to. Kinda like an Anglo Union-Lite
Instead of taking migrants from dangerous and poor/unfriendly countries.
If you have the right skills, there are existing pathways to migrate to places like Canada and Australia. Quite a lot of people are doing it. That really doesn't have anything to do with the UK's asylum claims backlog though.
@@frmcf no I meant people from those countries to move to the UK
@@0matters Hahaha why would they want to do that???
@@frmcf I dunno maybe they love English football, Harry Potter and so on.
UK is more liveable than Canada, smaller and easier to get around. Healthcare is less crazy than in USA too
Most are. Its pretty hard to get UK visas unless your skilled or working in an indemand industry.
Whilst the common narrative is that migration into the UK after the war was due to labour shortages and it enhanced our culture, I would question both. The dilution of any culture does not enhance it, it just changes it. The people just came seeking better lives for themselves; they had the status of being British subjects just like native people, and transport links had developed to a degree that it became possible to more and more people. Britain would have easily got by without immigration, the impact of the wars on the population was nowhere near as bad percentage wise as plagues of earlier centuries. Indeed, whilst all this was going on native British people were being enticed to emigrate to Australia (assisted passage migration scheme). The disturbing thing about this video is that it demonstrates the power of messaging (or perhaps propaganda, depending on your perspective).
There is another factor that is more worrying: a lot of facilities are hardly going to be usable to host tenants or guests after having been left in that business for a few years; even on a smaller scale, I was living in a place a couple of years ago where the landlords panicked during Covid and thus accepted a contract from some agency of social "workers" (spoiler: they don't really work at all) to host "troubled youth".
Well, fast forwards 2 years and they got tons of damage, normal tenants fleeing away and no joy in sight at the end of the tunnel: they will have to invest a lot to make those flats viable again to ordinary people.
Isolation is a problem, but when you let them out, they take photos of primary schools.
Also, it sure as shit wouldn't cost the UK anywhere near 5 billion a year to build a fleet of small and medium sized boats to patrol the channel for a year until it dies down and people stop coming, just one year, that, vs this catastrophic situation they've brought on because the UK is a small place. I keep hearing about this but no one actually does anything. The UK, a people known for boats, should build a fleet equipped with very sensitive radar, and patrol that channel for a year. That's it. That's all they had to do.
Spread the word! Spread the word!
How do you stop governmental corruption? By privatizing it.
The problem is that if you have hundreds of thousands of people enter the country illegally it’s either leave them to the street or turn to other methods that shady people are going to capitalise on it. Long term solutions are going to take years to build (you can’t just create asylum centres over night) and unfortunately the arrivals keep coming. If we can’t even house people that we have adding that burden will push it to the limit. Honestly I struggle to see a short term solution to this…
Where do you think most of the illegal migrants come from?
The government could bring out a law tomorrow that officially you are an asylum seeker in a neighbouring country only , if you move from that country you become an economic migrant and will be immediately deported. You must make your own mind up why they don’t but it could be incompetence, being too nice or they actually want it. If they want it there can only be two reasons, 1. It is to suppress wages or 2. To replace the indigenous people, my opinion is the second one.
Graham King. Let's make him famous. Clearspring needs to be torn apart by an independent firm. Let's see where that moneys actually going.
This sounds a bit like the elderly care facilities that was pitched by that British guy in Succession.
...BASICALLY *_HUMAN FARMING_*
......AND KIND OF double one WHICH MAKES THINGS ONLY WORSE
0:17 that kiss was wonderful
Great video
Thanks!
Again one more scandal will come out , home office raised all fees which will help more asylum seekers already in uk as they go into sponsorship visa where companies will bear all exp results in increase in employment costs and less in profits. Evasion of tax . hmrc is shit and UK
Lots and lots of holiday parks in Norfolk
We need a Trump.
At least other first world countries are as incompetent to the point of criminality as we are it’s disgusting empathetic it’s disgusting and pathetic
This is it, this is why we have immigration. Its purely business. Do you think a socialist, socially conservative system could work in resolving the problem?
that's what we have had ever since the end of WW2 so no it does not work it always leads to communism which is what we have right now we need an Ethno Nationalist government that only takes care of their own ethnic groups.
That's why what we need is a LIMIT of how much money you can get privately or as a family. Otherwise that's what we get, few people becoming billionaires at the expense of entire countries or on the back of the people!!!! Jail all billionaires, confiscate their money and wake them work minimum wage!
I have no problem with someone becoming a billionaire in their lifetime but when they die their assets and money should be seized by the state with a large deduction of say a £1 million to each of their children. This would stop dynasties forming of out of touch narcissists and help the taxpayers, unfortunately unlikely to happen unless it was agreed worldwide. I think a better solution would be a turnover tax on businesses where the money they earn in a country is taxed by that country, this would stop the corporations tax being filtered by certain countries like Ireland and the money earned would go back to benefit the country it was earned in.
@pincermovement72 but you have a clear example in a video right here, that in order to get those billions, you literally destroy the country for everyone else. And there's almost 3k billionaires in the world, imagine how they all destroy our lives on daily basis to get that money. People decades ago had cheaper rent, food and cost of living in general. Everything they bought, lasted for years and they didn't have to buy electronics every 2-3 years or spend ridiculous amounts of money on repairs. That's because there were fewer billionaires in the past. Now you have billionaires literally changing policies in foreign countries to fit their business model at cost of locals and local small businesses. Everything that's evil around you is because of greed. And if someone wants to be a billionaire and actively works towards it, he does it at cost of all others. These people are evil to the core.
LAB/CON both want open boarders.
I will just comment to say that the labour shortages myth stated at 2:25 is fictious. in fact during the windrush period hundreds and thousands of brits left the uk (mostly to canada and australia because of a lack of work oppotunites in the UK. We didn't have enough jobs for our population and yet we still brought in immigrants.
It also doesn't help that the previous govt effectively banned asylum cases from being processed, so more and more people got stuck, so more and more beds were needed. Hopefully, the current mob won't be so idiotic.
They aren't asylum seekers. Most of these people go through 3+ safe countries to get here. They're economic migrants (mostly men) who are looking to cash in on better markets and welfare systems. We need to recognize them as such.
No that’s would be government funded NGOs blocking the asylum system with claim after claim which makes many people very rich on the taxpayer.
The real question is why the government kept this going and allow boats to keep coming. Could it be making people in the government make money as well, because it seems the only looser is the taxpayer
Why European don’t Apply Australia way. Anyone entering illegally would never get legal status.
MP's family and friends set up Ltd companies and get government contracts.
IF THE NAVY WAS ANY GOOD THE WOULD BE ABLE TO STOP THE BOATS WITH DRONES AN D MARINE WALLS TO KEEK THEM ON THE FRENCH SIDE MAY BE THE NEED TO GET THE UKRANES IN TO SHOW THEM HOW
The issue lies with how we process migrants. If we can actually process them properly then we can send them back properly.
Interesting video and well presented.
I do take issue with what you stated at 12.05
"Echo the trauma they fled." They left France. It isn't a traumatic place. It is safe place in which to claim asylum. Anything that happened, or didn't happen before landing in mainland Europe is irrelevant.
Simple solution - let taxpayers make a declaration in their annual tax assesements how much each person is willingly allowinh the govermnment to spend on immigration - government make a limited fund out of it, calculates how much immigrants it can house in given year for that money and don't take any more immigrants above that threshold.
what About our own Home les people's in our own Country First?
6:51 Ad skip
Put them in holiday parks there all over the country they need somewhere to go and let them work
you wanna go and relax with your family around immigrants 😐
Money is the source of all problems
No. It's the human nature. Simple as that.
Your preface introduction here is completely wrong. In the 1950s we were not facing labour shortages they were businesses did not want to pay the wages that were being requested by low wage workers. If you look back at that time period there was a massive push of anti-immigration. There has never been a request for immigration to the UK. It has only been the government policy to do so for large businesses to suppress wages. Every single government since the war has had a promise in their manifesto to lower immigration.
If someone really thinks we should help illegal immigrants, I’d suggest they take some into their own home instead of expecting everyone else to pay for it!!!
The Book of Revelations has opened...
Aii mate gim the innigrents a botta ow wata init 😂
So rich brits messed up the country and poor brits are complaining but cannot pin point who is the culprit
Without private companies it could be even worse and more costly
Stockholm syndrome.
Delusional or stupid?
@@kookoopoo7951 If you think about it, you’ll realize that bureaucrats can’t do anything more. They’ll spend more money, and the situation would only worsen. You can’t beat physics.
Diabolical
Privation and penjury await the uk
Invade the world
Invite the world.
I'm sorry but why are you blaming business, who are of course only in it for the money, like all businessmen - as a purported 'economics' channel you should know this - for *POLITICAL* failure, cowardice and stupidity of successive Westminster governments who have encouraged this situation to continue.
The Clearsprings is innocent.
He's just a scapegoat.
Blame Blair, Cameron, Johnson, Starmer etc.
Disgraceful
Chickens r come home to roost!!... For 500 years the British robbed the world and made them self rich... Now 😂
Embarrassing comment
Comment reported, enjoy the shadows.
Look up oikophobia.
UK has come back to its poor state because "revenues" are not arriving from far away British "possessions".
England was always a wealthy country if you can be bothered to read history which is why it was invaded so much and I would question did our empire make us wealthy or did it make the ruling elite wealthy only ? The poor always had a comparable decent standard of living compared to our European brothers usually because war on our land was rare unlike the continent. Revenues still come from far off countries because we have the city of London financial system which provides 40% of our tax revenue.