In case you were wondering . We got slapped with Copyright claims, so we had to partially or fully blur out certain clips in order to not have to re-upload this video.
I feel as if Vince McMahon didn't want that to happen at this point with both guys starting to get past their prime. If he did, I feel he would've booked it at WrestleMania 31 instead of having HHH face Sting
@@ProWrestling.WhatIfhe's right tho .... Before Sting got injured the plan was to build towards Sting vs Taker at Mania 32... Then it was planned to be Taker vs Cena and Taker vs Lesnar again before we eventually got Shane of all people
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf but there was no logic or sense to have sting vs taker at 32 since sting debuted at ss 2014 and interfering in authority business so it was much more logical and made sense of him facing triple h as per storyline. Sting vs taker would be nothing than a dream match without story and build up while 2016 will give them more good enough reason to fight each other than WWE promoting it as dream match
Same, especially since Mania is Orlando since it was my first one. I believe he should’ve absolutely destroyed Roman Reigns and went 25-0 then retired his dead man character. Faced off 3 years later at Mania 36 with fans against AJ and won.
Personally, I think having either Sting or even Bray Wyatt break the streak would've been a better move. Brock Lesnar was already made a beast, and honestly, I didn't think he needed anymore proof that he was, it could've been saved for either Sting to better establish himself as a prominent wrestler in WWE and allow him to stay there for longer, or could've truly been a passing of the torch moment for Bray Wyatt to become the "new face of fear."
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Bray Wyatt would've been terrible choice if his career would remain the same like it was in real timelines. The only person who makes sense to defeat taker was the one who looks unstoppable beast, top guy or who's getting passing torch from Undertaker. Brock still was more believable guy than anybody to beat him due to his character in wwe that time. Only person who can beat Undertaker in 2014 was John cena or possibly rock
It’s Vince McMahon’s WWE yes but I feel like they had Roman beat Taker with the assumption that the streak already being over would help fans accept the win over Taker
Taker valued the streak but also he was a company guy through and through so when Vince asked him to do the job he basically just said it's your show so okay. But in hindsight he did say if anyone was gonna break it he wanted it to be someone who it elevated like a bray Wyatt or a Roman reigns.
A couple of fun facts regarding the Streak: 1. Had Undertaker not lost to Brock Lesnar and Roman Reigns at WrestleMania 30 and 33, respectively, he’d be 27-0. 2. If he hadn’t missed WrestleMania 10, 16 and 35 and still hadn’t ever lost like mentioned above, he’d be 30-0. Otherwise, had he lost the two times he did, but didn’t miss WM10, 16 and 35, he’d be 28-0. Just randomly decided to do a bit of quick math in my head.
Should've been 30-0. But personally the Undertaker conference was low and he was past his prime. I would've did 20-0. Undertaker always say it was a special moment when him, Triple H, and Shawn Michaels stood on the ramp. Undertaker has the picture above his gym. Plus, it was an end of era match.
Yeah……. I didn’t really disagree with anything you really said for the most part….. And I honestly believe (back then and now) that him losing to Brock to end the streak was literally on of the worst chosen!!! But also with that handicap match at the end….. I can’t see that happening at WM! Especially if the streak was still alive at that point!!! Either before or after!?! Mainly because if it happened at WM then it would be guaranteed that he wouldn’t lose!!! 100% no way! WWE knows how much they have to do to tiptoe around a mess they made until it starts to fade away (I would have said “WWE and fans”, but fans apparently have a very very VERY short memory!!! Almost comical!?! If it wasn’t for the fact that a lot of the stupid that’s going on right now, is only happening because of fans lack of memory)! And if they had The Undertaker lose his streak by not even losing it, that would be a large mess! And would take awhile for it to go away!!! But unfortunately, fans are still stuck in the stupid and WWE knows how short their memories are! So it could possibly happen….. but I still doubt it!
Defeats John Cena at Mania 30 because Brock was obviously handpicked by Taker when he showed up at that UFC fight to end it all. Cena temporarily turns Heel after snapping getting his arse kicked. Defeats Bray Wyatt at 31 because it was coming anyways. Sting should of happened at this event IMO it was the only real possible timeframe of finally going down. Defeats Sting at 32 if Sting isn't injured. Defeats Brock Lesnar OR Bray Wyatt at 32 going 24-0 if Sting is injured. The Brothers of Destruction defeat The Wyatt Family at 33. Retires Kane at 34. Defeats Roman Reigns at 35 as he is not as injured from working with Kane one of the safest workers in the industry the year prior if even possible. Undertaker retires against AJ Styles at 36 after burying him alive. Streak stays intact with an extra Win included vs Reigns the year prior within it as deserving as it was. Rest...In....Peace....Streak.
I mean the Big Show/ A Train Mania was originally supposed to be a tag match and this Vince McMahon we talking about you can’t put nothing crazy past him back in 2016
At WM 30 the opponent for the undertaker should be Chris jericho or Alberto del rio.Brock didn't need to win against the undertaker.For vince,that was a masterstroke and that's is something he actually feel proud of.Brock should go head to head with Kane.But that what we think.Brock in his first run with the company gained so much popularity and after his legitimate performance in UFC/Octagon.The streak shouldn't be ruined by him and if somebody could break that streak,that would be Roman reigns or Somebody like Samoa Joe.Which help them to be the next top guy in WWE.
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf But there were other guys in WWE that could possibly work with The undertaker just to keep the streak alive.Edge on Impaulsive told that he turned down that idea when it was around 15-0.HHH,HBK,CM Punk got that chance to do so,but they turned down that offer as the streak was one of the marquee attention in Wrestlemania history.
Jericho vs Taker at WM 29 the year prior would have been better than Jericho vs Fandango. As for Punk... move him into the main event match and do what he suggested. Make it a Triple Threat Elimination Match where Punk gets eliminated and it still comes down to Rock vs Cena.
@@RingsideCinema Fair enough and that triple threat match could went longer than we expected and the main event could be more entertaining that 3 top guys of the company fighting for the biggest prize of the company.
Ive always said Brock was not a bad choice to break the streak for the fact that Cena wouldn't have allowed brock to sqaush him at summerslam and there for we lose an iconic summerslam main event and also that loss is the start of John Cenas mid card run which ruled so id rather have those 2 than takers streak, but i do think that punk or wyatt beating taker would have been better if they allowed who broke the streak to cook in the following months
I personally believe he should've beat Brock and then retire at Wrestlemania 32. It's his home state with over a 100k in attendance. Maybe have his final opponent be John Cena.. if he's not injured in this timeline.
In this timeline, the list of injured stars is still in affect, so unfortunately Cena is out of the picture. However, I feel Undertaker wanted to face Cena and be his final match at 32, hense why he worked quite a bit in 2015. Almost like a retirement tour leading up to WrestleMania 32.
@ProWrestling.WhatIf Really? I didn't know that. Cena vs Taker with the streak intact and him being Undertaker's final soul would've been a perfect send off.
Undertaker never should've lost at Wrestlemania to both Brock Lesnar & Roman Reigns. Stupid Mr. McMahon. On my Dream Undertaker Wrestlemania Undefeated streak, If Undertaker didn't wrestle Shane McMahon, I'd have had Undertaker face The Rock in a Hell In a Cell Match - under Last Man Standing rules with Stone Cold Steve Austin as guest Referee. If he hadn't missed Wrestlemania 35, I'd have like to have seen him face Bobby Lashley. And then the Boneyard match with AJ Styles at Wrestlemania 36. I wish it was 30 - 0 at WM.
This is pretty cool. It was a terrible idea for Brock to beat the streak because he didn't need that push. If it were someone like Punk or Wyatt or Reigns, it would have made a lot more sense as they were up and coming stars, it would have meant something. With Brock though, it was a part timer beating another part timer. Worst of all, it was an awful match. It would have been a lot better if Taker was in with someone else that night who could help him look good in the ring as his body just couldn't do the things that it used to do. If it were me, this is how I'd book it: WM 30: Instead of Taker VS Brock and having Kane randomly teaming with the New Age Outlaws to take on The Shield, I'd have Taker VS Seth and Kane VS Dean. Taker beats Seth, Dean beats Kane. Summerslam 2014: Brothers Of Destruction VS The Shield (Dean and Seth with Roman at ringside). Shield win after Roman interferes. Survivor Series 2014: BOD, Goldust and Stardust VS The Shield and Big Show. BOD win. WM 31: Taker Vs Wyatt. Taker wins. WM 32: Taker VS Dean. Taker wins. Royal Rumble 2017: Taker enters at 30 to win the Rumble. Roman wins the Universal Championship. WM 33: Taker VS Roman - Streak VS Title Hell In A Cell Match. Roman wins. WM 34: Brothers Of Destruction VS Cesaro and Sheamus - WWE Raw Tag Team Championships - BOD win, then defend the titles at selected PPVs for the rest of the year. Royal Rumble 2019: Brothers Of Destruction VS The Revival - WWE Raw Tag Team Championships - The Revival win. WM 36: Taker VS AJ Styles - Boneyard Match - Taker wins. Survivor Series 2020 - Taker's 30th Anniversary. BOD, Edge and Jeff Hardy VS AJ Styles, The Revival and Randy Orton - BOD team win. WM 40: Taker VS AJ Styles in front of an audience for the first time. AJ wins.
I wouldn't of mind Punk having been the guy to end the streak for WrestleMania 29. The build up based off Paul Bearer's death was gold. Paul Heyman dressed up as Bearer was hilarious. Speaking of Heyman, glad he's going into the HOF this year.
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Naw, he retires at first with the streak intact then comes back to unsuccessfully challenge The Tribal Chief during his legendary reign... Undertaker too falls victim to the Bloodline
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Well if he's challenging Roman Reigns for the Universal Championship in 2021 or 2022 then he is definitely challenging The Bloodline as well💯
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Undertaker should have retired undefeated at Wrestlemania. Fits his character perfectly.
i believe :) he let brock break the streak to say thank you to paul for everything he had done for him. and brock and him are friends but i love this
Glad I found this channel, I love What If? scenarios and Undertaker's my favorite wrestler of all-time. Great first video dude
Thank you 😊
In case you were wondering . We got slapped with Copyright claims, so we had to partially or fully blur out certain clips in order to not have to re-upload this video.
Taker's original WM 32 opponent Was Sting actually
I feel as if Vince McMahon didn't want that to happen at this point with both guys starting to get past their prime. If he did, I feel he would've booked it at WrestleMania 31 instead of having HHH face Sting
@@ProWrestling.WhatIfhe's right tho .... Before Sting got injured the plan was to build towards Sting vs Taker at Mania 32... Then it was planned to be Taker vs Cena and Taker vs Lesnar again before we eventually got Shane of all people
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf but there was no logic or sense to have sting vs taker at 32 since sting debuted at ss 2014 and interfering in authority business so it was much more logical and made sense of him facing triple h as per storyline. Sting vs taker would be nothing than a dream match without story and build up while 2016 will give them more good enough reason to fight each other than WWE promoting it as dream match
It was nevrr stint
Personally, I would've had Taker go out at 25-0.
Same, especially since Mania is Orlando since it was my first one. I believe he should’ve absolutely destroyed Roman Reigns and went 25-0 then retired his dead man character. Faced off 3 years later at Mania 36 with fans against AJ and won.
Personally, I think having either Sting or even Bray Wyatt break the streak would've been a better move. Brock Lesnar was already made a beast, and honestly, I didn't think he needed anymore proof that he was, it could've been saved for either Sting to better establish himself as a prominent wrestler in WWE and allow him to stay there for longer, or could've truly been a passing of the torch moment for Bray Wyatt to become the "new face of fear."
Bray Wyatt would've been a great choice. Sting didn't need to end the streak, and Vince wouldn't of let it happen since he was a "WCW Guy"
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Bray Wyatt would've been terrible choice if his career would remain the same like it was in real timelines. The only person who makes sense to defeat taker was the one who looks unstoppable beast, top guy or who's getting passing torch from Undertaker.
Brock still was more believable guy than anybody to beat him due to his character in wwe that time. Only person who can beat Undertaker in 2014 was John cena or possibly rock
It’s Vince McMahon’s WWE yes but I feel like they had Roman beat Taker with the assumption that the streak already being over would help fans accept the win over Taker
Undertaker vs Seth Rollins in 2015 would be 🔥🔥
Taker valued the streak but also he was a company guy through and through so when Vince asked him to do the job he basically just said it's your show so okay. But in hindsight he did say if anyone was gonna break it he wanted it to be someone who it elevated like a bray Wyatt or a Roman reigns.
Can we get a what if Mordecai kept his character
How about what if Kane won 2001 Royal Rumble Match with 12 Eliminations
We'll probably cover this at point once Royal Rumble season hits again
To be honest no body should have end the Streak. Undertaker should have retire with the Streak not being broken.
A couple of fun facts regarding the Streak:
1. Had Undertaker not lost to Brock Lesnar and Roman Reigns at WrestleMania 30 and 33, respectively, he’d be 27-0.
2. If he hadn’t missed WrestleMania 10, 16 and 35 and still hadn’t ever lost like mentioned above, he’d be 30-0. Otherwise, had he lost the two times he did, but didn’t miss WM10, 16 and 35, he’d be 28-0.
Just randomly decided to do a bit of quick math in my head.
Should've been 30-0. But personally the Undertaker conference was low and he was past his prime. I would've did 20-0. Undertaker always say it was a special moment when him, Triple H, and Shawn Michaels stood on the ramp. Undertaker has the picture above his gym. Plus, it was an end of era match.
Yeah……. I didn’t really disagree with anything you really said for the most part….. And I honestly believe (back then and now) that him losing to Brock to end the streak was literally on of the worst chosen!!! But also with that handicap match at the end….. I can’t see that happening at WM! Especially if the streak was still alive at that point!!! Either before or after!?! Mainly because if it happened at WM then it would be guaranteed that he wouldn’t lose!!! 100% no way! WWE knows how much they have to do to tiptoe around a mess they made until it starts to fade away (I would have said “WWE and fans”, but fans apparently have a very very VERY short memory!!! Almost comical!?! If it wasn’t for the fact that a lot of the stupid that’s going on right now, is only happening because of fans lack of memory)! And if they had The Undertaker lose his streak by not even losing it, that would be a large mess! And would take awhile for it to go away!!! But unfortunately, fans are still stuck in the stupid and WWE knows how short their memories are! So it could possibly happen….. but I still doubt it!
Make what if Eddie Guerrero never Died
Stay tuned ;)
Undertaker has never beat Brock Lesnar one on one at WrestleMania
In the real timeline, that is correct
Defeats John Cena at Mania 30 because Brock was obviously handpicked by Taker when he showed up at that UFC fight to end it all. Cena temporarily turns Heel after snapping getting his arse kicked.
Defeats Bray Wyatt at 31 because it was coming anyways. Sting should of happened at this event IMO it was the only real possible timeframe of finally going down.
Defeats Sting at 32 if Sting isn't injured. Defeats Brock Lesnar OR Bray Wyatt at 32 going 24-0 if Sting is injured.
The Brothers of Destruction defeat The Wyatt Family at 33.
Retires Kane at 34.
Defeats Roman Reigns at 35 as he is not as injured from working with Kane one of the safest workers in the industry the year prior if even possible.
Undertaker retires against AJ Styles at 36 after burying him alive. Streak stays intact with an extra Win included vs Reigns the year prior within it as deserving as it was. Rest...In....Peace....Streak.
Sorry but I don’t believe for a second they’d have booked a tag team match for WM32 if Taker were going in at 23-0
I mean the Big Show/ A Train Mania was originally supposed to be a tag match and this Vince McMahon we talking about you can’t put nothing crazy past him back in 2016
@@javonwilliamson6986 The Streak was no where near as big a deal at that time though. They only started using it as a massive selling point at WM21.
At WM 30 the opponent for the undertaker should be Chris jericho or Alberto del rio.Brock didn't need to win against the undertaker.For vince,that was a masterstroke and that's is something he actually feel proud of.Brock should go head to head with Kane.But that what we think.Brock in his first run with the company gained so much popularity and after his legitimate performance in UFC/Octagon.The streak shouldn't be ruined by him and if somebody could break that streak,that would be Roman reigns or Somebody like Samoa Joe.Which help them to be the next top guy in WWE.
Jericho I believe was touring with Fozzy, so I don't think it could've been him
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf But there were other guys in WWE that could possibly work with The undertaker just to keep the streak alive.Edge on Impaulsive told that he turned down that idea when it was around 15-0.HHH,HBK,CM Punk got that chance to do so,but they turned down that offer as the streak was one of the marquee attention in Wrestlemania history.
Jericho vs Taker at WM 29 the year prior would have been better than Jericho vs Fandango. As for Punk... move him into the main event match and do what he suggested. Make it a Triple Threat Elimination Match where Punk gets eliminated and it still comes down to Rock vs Cena.
@@RingsideCinema Fair enough and that triple threat match could went longer than we expected and the main event could be more entertaining that 3 top guys of the company fighting for the biggest prize of the company.
What if Sting showed up to WWF/E during the WCW Invasion?
Ive always said Brock was not a bad choice to break the streak for the fact that Cena wouldn't have allowed brock to sqaush him at summerslam and there for we lose an iconic summerslam main event and also that loss is the start of John Cenas mid card run which ruled so id rather have those 2 than takers streak, but i do think that punk or wyatt beating taker would have been better if they allowed who broke the streak to cook in the following months
What if Benoit got drafted to ECW instead of Angle in 06
good job bro
This is awesome
Thank you. We're proud of this first episode
Undertaker would have done the jumping tombstone pile driver on brock lesnar
I personally believe he should've beat Brock and then retire at Wrestlemania 32. It's his home state with over a 100k in attendance. Maybe have his final opponent be John Cena.. if he's not injured in this timeline.
In this timeline, the list of injured stars is still in affect, so unfortunately Cena is out of the picture. However, I feel Undertaker wanted to face Cena and be his final match at 32, hense why he worked quite a bit in 2015. Almost like a retirement tour leading up to WrestleMania 32.
@ProWrestling.WhatIf Really? I didn't know that. Cena vs Taker with the streak intact and him being Undertaker's final soul would've been a perfect send off.
Honestly think it probably should have been Wyatt who beat him
undertaker should of kept his undefeated streak to respect of the undertaker i miss the undertaker as the dead man
What if owen hart won the wwf championship in 1994
If he didn’t end his streak in the ring, the streak in his underwear would continue to grow
Undertaker never should've lost at Wrestlemania to both Brock Lesnar & Roman Reigns. Stupid Mr. McMahon. On my Dream Undertaker Wrestlemania Undefeated streak, If Undertaker didn't wrestle Shane McMahon, I'd have had Undertaker face The Rock in a Hell In a Cell Match - under Last Man Standing rules with Stone Cold Steve Austin as guest Referee. If he hadn't missed Wrestlemania 35, I'd have like to have seen him face Bobby Lashley. And then the Boneyard match with AJ Styles at Wrestlemania 36. I wish it was 30 - 0 at WM.
When the streak ended I stopped watching WWE.
You're missing out on some great wrestling going on right now!
Brock should have not ended the streak
I'd still be watching wwe!
There was a point where I thought about not watching WWE cause of the streak. There's more to it than that, so I kept going.
For me that was the last straw.
I love this!!!
We love this too, and can't wait for the next episode to be released!
It should have been kane
ITS GOTTA BE KANE 😂😂😂. LOL in all honestly though, I wished Kane got a third match with Taker at WrestleMania. I would've been ok with Kane ending it.
Could of been kane’s revenge
This is just my personal opinion. I think Brock Lesnar went into business for himself.
I've heard a lot of people think this too
Roman would’ve ended it😂
Even Undertaker himself said he would've wanted Roman to end it.
if got lots of respect for him
And won 🥇 the match
This is pretty cool. It was a terrible idea for Brock to beat the streak because he didn't need that push. If it were someone like Punk or Wyatt or Reigns, it would have made a lot more sense as they were up and coming stars, it would have meant something. With Brock though, it was a part timer beating another part timer. Worst of all, it was an awful match. It would have been a lot better if Taker was in with someone else that night who could help him look good in the ring as his body just couldn't do the things that it used to do. If it were me, this is how I'd book it:
WM 30: Instead of Taker VS Brock and having Kane randomly teaming with the New Age Outlaws to take on The Shield, I'd have Taker VS Seth and Kane VS Dean. Taker beats Seth, Dean beats Kane.
Summerslam 2014: Brothers Of Destruction VS The Shield (Dean and Seth with Roman at ringside). Shield win after Roman interferes.
Survivor Series 2014: BOD, Goldust and Stardust VS The Shield and Big Show. BOD win.
WM 31: Taker Vs Wyatt. Taker wins.
WM 32: Taker VS Dean. Taker wins.
Royal Rumble 2017: Taker enters at 30 to win the Rumble. Roman wins the Universal Championship.
WM 33: Taker VS Roman - Streak VS Title Hell In A Cell Match. Roman wins.
WM 34: Brothers Of Destruction VS Cesaro and Sheamus - WWE Raw Tag Team Championships - BOD win, then defend the titles at selected PPVs for the rest of the year.
Royal Rumble 2019: Brothers Of Destruction VS The Revival - WWE Raw Tag Team Championships - The Revival win.
WM 36: Taker VS AJ Styles - Boneyard Match - Taker wins.
Survivor Series 2020 - Taker's 30th Anniversary. BOD, Edge and Jeff Hardy VS AJ Styles, The Revival and Randy Orton - BOD team win.
WM 40: Taker VS AJ Styles in front of an audience for the first time. AJ wins.
The Revival Left Before Survivor Series 2020
I wouldn't of mind Punk having been the guy to end the streak for WrestleMania 29. The build up based off Paul Bearer's death was gold. Paul Heyman dressed up as Bearer was hilarious. Speaking of Heyman, glad he's going into the HOF this year.
Taker shouldn't have lost at all period.
@@ProWrestling.WhatIfthat would have been disrespectful
If Roman ended the streak that man has to turn heel
Agreed lol
Then Roman will be the first person who will Brock the streak
That might have never happened if brock didn’t end it though
That's very possible
Undertaker retires and keeps the Streak intact.... Fast Forward a few years into 2021 or 2022 and He finally loses to the Tribal Chief Roman Reigns!💯🩸
Then that means he doesn't retire with the streak intact since he came back to lose.
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Naw, he retires at first with the streak intact then comes back to unsuccessfully challenge The Tribal Chief during his legendary reign... Undertaker too falls victim to the Bloodline
Undertaker doesn't need to feud with the Bloodline lol.
@@ProWrestling.WhatIf Well if he's challenging Roman Reigns for the Universal Championship in 2021 or 2022 then he is definitely challenging The Bloodline as well💯
@@rcdune7132taker shouldnt lose his streak via cheating, it would do nothing for the winner