So tough to find really clean copies of cards that are 30 years old. Especially of superstar players. Cards like that get a lot of “Love” from previous owners. They get looked at a lot, moved from boxes to binder sheets to top loaders to Mags. Love seeing all them of though. Nice job Frosty.
Not going to lie that I've been waiting for something like this for a long time. Thank you for this and now I will go and look at my own MJ's again before they go out to PSA.
Are those the grades u predict if the cards are sent in without cleaning, polishing or working on corners and edges? You didn't mention if you thought any of the problems could be fixed and possibly bump the grades
@robmckay7289 Hey Rob, These grade guesses are based on as is. With all the craziness around cleaning etc. I keep those conversations private now with the owners of the cards.
Well the problem really is at the root. Most people don't look at their cards in depth enough. All the grading companies have the same issues as it's all subjective and based on an individuals opinion and company grading criteria. If we look at the cards unbiasedly, it would yield the results that are just. All grading is inconsistent, PSA just so happens to be the company that grades the most cards due to high resale values so they get the grunt of the negativity.
And what data do you have that shows this? Or are you just upset you didn't get 10's on cards you felt should be 10's? Because all the points you made appear to be completely emotional.
So tough to find really clean copies of cards that are 30 years old. Especially of superstar players. Cards like that get a lot of “Love” from previous owners. They get looked at a lot, moved from boxes to binder sheets to top loaders to Mags. Love seeing all them of though. Nice job Frosty.
Excellent background music
Not going to lie that I've been waiting for something like this for a long time. Thank you for this and now I will go and look at my own MJ's again before they go out to PSA.
It's you guys that provide these cards for content so I thank you all really. Appreciate you as always brother.
Great commentary at the beginning. I agree with you 💯
Mystery Finest Borderless MJ 3:32
Mystery Finest Bordered MJ 7:07
1993-94 Finest MJ 9:55
1994-95 Finest MJ W/Protective Peel 12:55
1995-96 Finest MJ W/Protective Peel 16:18
1994-95 Skybox Emotion N-Tense 19:12
UD Triple Double Hologram MJ 22:26
Topps Chrome Championship Spirit MJ 24:58
Topps Chrome Back to Back MJ 28:05
1993-94 Fleer Living Legends MJ 31:01
1993-94 Fleer Sharpshooters MJ 33:22
Topps Stadium Club Nemesis MJ/Dumars 36:15
UD Ionix Area 23 MJ 38:03
Starting Lineup MJ 40:31
Starting Lineup MJ 42:40
Are those the grades u predict if the cards are sent in without cleaning, polishing or working on corners and edges? You didn't mention if you thought any of the problems could be fixed and possibly bump the grades
@robmckay7289 Hey Rob,
These grade guesses are based on as is. With all the craziness around cleaning etc. I keep those conversations private now with the owners of the cards.
@@frostyfeetcards makes sense bro 👍
The problem is that you are sending to PSA. PSA is corrupt and their grading is inconsistent at best. Oh, and their slabs suck.
Well the problem really is at the root. Most people don't look at their cards in depth enough. All the grading companies have the same issues as it's all subjective and based on an individuals opinion and company grading criteria. If we look at the cards unbiasedly, it would yield the results that are just. All grading is inconsistent, PSA just so happens to be the company that grades the most cards due to high resale values so they get the grunt of the negativity.
And what data do you have that shows this? Or are you just upset you didn't get 10's on cards you felt should be 10's? Because all the points you made appear to be completely emotional.