It amazes me that ChatGPT was trained in part on StackOverflow, and somehow is coming up with reasonable answers instead of saying that this question is opinion based or is a duplicate.
Let's be fair, the StackOverflow team probably had just as much fun as we did when they read the question and they probably have it saved somewhere. Their job simply got in the way of entertainment.
@@cellularmitosis2 AI is smarter than me and it offered these other alternatives: Combined object collection type, Compact object container type, Concurrent object collection type, and Compressed object cache table. But ultimately it's not what it stands for, it's what you do with your coct that counts.
Title: "Why Do Developers Find Coct More Satisfying Than Dict for Data Storage?" Question: I'm working on a project where I need to store data in a way that allows for easy retrieval. At first, I thought using the Dict data structure would be the perfect solution. However, after speaking with many developers, I've come to understand that they find Coct more satisfying to use and struggle with the challenges of using Dict for data storage. As a programmer, I'm curious to know what makes Coct a more satisfying option than Dict. I understand that Coct is a Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) data structure that allows you to push items onto the top of the stack and pop items from the top. But what makes it easier to work with than Dict? Are there any specific use cases where Coct is more appropriate than Dict, or is it just a matter of personal preference? Additionally, what kind of performance and memory benefits does Coct offer over Dict, if any? I'm eager to learn more about why developers find Coct more satisfying to use than Dict and what challenges they face when using Dict.
At the time I type this, there are exactly "69" thumbs up (likes) for this comment. In deference to the double entendre, I respectfully ask all readers NOT to give another thumbs up. So we can keep the likes to this excellent comment at exactly sixty-nine. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
This is probably just because of the dict-measuring contest they have at Stack Overflow, they couldn't let the employees get ideas at the most efficient way to measure dicts.
He actually shared this story before on stream, the first time I hear it I was so glad that at some point he decided to do streaming and we mere mortals can eventually hear this story. Prime is the G.O.A.T.
The moderation team response is on point. It's always fun to read the breakdown of a lil bit of trolling that could otherwise try and hide behind plausible deniability of being a legitimate question.
Need more context for a good answer, since dicts come in a lot of different sizes. You said you work with large dicts however people tend to overestimate the sizes of their dicts. Can you please share a snapshot of your dict?
I think they passed it around across all mods before deleting it. They knew what they had on their hands, just a shame they won't share it with the world.
I hobby code and have done a lot, but gave it up since I'm into chess now and my family. But Dick here is so inspiring it almost wants me to get back into coding!
You should try it as a stack of strings, implemented using arrays. Like a call stack, you can push new data up into the Array String Stack. If they have a problem with this struct too, then they're really being overly anal about it.
If you want to measure data and include pointers you can stack the data together and then measure the width of the contiguous block of memory. There's a Moment Like This right after a copying garbage collector is done where all the objects in the heap are now stacked together. maybe im misunderstanding the goal though
06:02 but remember, you don’t need the suit or the cape to be a real-life hero. it's more about what you do and how you help others (especially twitch chat and yt comments) KWKW
I've always wondered why the Golang people used the unfortunate abbreviation "cum" in their benchmark profiling tool, to refer to cumulative. Maybe you should do a stack overflow question based on that.
GPT came just in time because moderators at Stack overflow are on power trips. Rather than answering questions they go off on tangents about etiquette and closing questions. FTS!
I love that I now have a recording of ThePrimeagen talking about measuring dicts (it doesn't sound like you're saying that 😅) should I turn it into a song?
"Big dicts are hard to come by. Although they provide a long, hard thrust, they consist of more bytes than most can chew." Dr. Hugh Mungus. PHD (Pretty Huge Dict)
I might be the most dect guy in such questions 😂😂😂 But inside the team only I don't have the courage to say them here out loud 😂 Butt any way that was hilariously funny 😂
It amazes me that ChatGPT was trained in part on StackOverflow, and somehow is coming up with reasonable answers instead of saying that this question is opinion based or is a duplicate.
😂
well, they have filter layers, could just filter them out, or just not include them in the training data.
Just read the documentation
Reinforcement learning with human feedback
To be fair they did have to train a second AI model on top of the first one to remove the toxicity
Let's be fair, the StackOverflow team probably had just as much fun as we did when they read the question and they probably have it saved somewhere. Their job simply got in the way of entertainment.
Yeah, I really appreciated it. They probably have to respond to so many dumb questions.
StackOverflow mods are demons who don't laugh
@@StefanReich Which mod downvoted the answer you provided that was better than the accepted answer?
Speaking from personal experience by the way.
@@StefanReich nah even the mod told him in the email that his post was fire
Yeah, I mean if it’s been asked several times then you don’t want to get into a dict measuring contest.
Consider using an alternative data structure, such as a coct.
Could you give me more information about the coct? It seems intriguing.
Collection of concatenated tensors?
@@cellularmitosis2 AI is smarter than me and it offered these other alternatives: Combined object collection type, Compact object container type, Concurrent object collection type, and Compressed object cache table. But ultimately it's not what it stands for, it's what you do with your coct that counts.
Title: "Why Do Developers Find Coct More Satisfying Than Dict for Data Storage?"
Question:
I'm working on a project where I need to store data in a way that allows for easy retrieval. At first, I thought using the Dict data structure would be the perfect solution. However, after speaking with many developers, I've come to understand that they find Coct more satisfying to use and struggle with the challenges of using Dict for data storage.
As a programmer, I'm curious to know what makes Coct a more satisfying option than Dict. I understand that Coct is a Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) data structure that allows you to push items onto the top of the stack and pop items from the top. But what makes it easier to work with than Dict?
Are there any specific use cases where Coct is more appropriate than Dict, or is it just a matter of personal preference? Additionally, what kind of performance and memory benefits does Coct offer over Dict, if any?
I'm eager to learn more about why developers find Coct more satisfying to use than Dict and what challenges they face when using Dict.
At the time I type this, there are exactly "69" thumbs up (likes) for this comment. In deference to the double entendre, I respectfully ask all readers NOT to give another thumbs up. So we can keep the likes to this excellent comment at exactly sixty-nine. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
The question was valid. Preventing unsolicited leaks while using your dict should be your no. 1 priority
The fact they complemented your effort shows it made its way around the office lol
a complement and a compliment are 2 veeeeery different things
This is probably just because of the dict-measuring contest they have at Stack Overflow, they couldn't let the employees get ideas at the most efficient way to measure dicts.
Use Swing to bend the curve. Or at least put a skin on it.
Yeah, everyone wants to be the guy who can measure the most dicts.
"it can grow substantially when you start messing with it", I'm dead
Oh, I didn't even realize that until you commented it XD
This is the quality content I'm here for XD
I also enjoy watching your content, keep it up 🔥
He actually shared this story before on stream, the first time I hear it I was so glad that at some point he decided to do streaming and we mere mortals can eventually hear this story. Prime is the G.O.A.T.
This is the stream
The moderation team response is on point.
It's always fun to read the breakdown of a lil bit of trolling that could otherwise try and hide behind plausible deniability of being a legitimate question.
Moderation team showing some real small dict energy
A night out, having a dict measuring contest, we’ve all been there.
Pretty standard Friday
Need more context for a good answer, since dicts come in a lot of different sizes. You said you work with large dicts however people tend to overestimate the sizes of their dicts. Can you please share a snapshot of your dict?
There are twenty thumbs up to this comment at the moment, and with another 49 we can get to a meaningful number.
I'm a visual learner btw
@@inertia_dagger Yeah we too, I feel like a dict pic would be helpful to get a better grasp of what he's working with.
Somewhere, at some internal private Slack channel at Stackoverflow offices this question is still pinned
I'm looking forward to integrate automatic dict measurement into my CoC workflow
The most elongated dict joke on the internet.
That one has got to have a nasty musk on it.
The "impressive" part meant: "we had a good laugh, sorry we can't keep it in the site lol"
this made my day lmao
my day was also lmaoing and now I know the cause
Hey, you and _Stack Overflow_ made me invent a new word: "dicthead".
I'll never put a dictionary on my head again.
dic thead
Guess that's a new word to add to your dict
lmao of course that was the respond from stack overflow team
they always response that way
This was legit one of the best posts I've seen in a while..
They totally had fun reading it
I think they passed it around across all mods before deleting it. They knew what they had on their hands, just a shame they won't share it with the world.
god this made me fucking scream laughing. this was so fucking funny.
You know what? If I had kids, I would never leave them alone with _Stack Overflow_ moderators. 😨
This guy is a damn legend.
Don't let the moustache fool you, he is, indeed, 12! :)
I hobby code and have done a lot, but gave it up since I'm into chess now and my family. But Dick here is so inspiring it almost wants me to get back into coding!
Wait, did you say you and your family got into chess?
@@gargantooga Yes. Look at my nym name, it's a chess opening.
You should try it as a stack of strings, implemented using arrays. Like a call stack, you can push new data up into the Array String Stack.
If they have a problem with this struct too, then they're really being overly anal about it.
hehehehe anal and dict
that guy have a super power of how to read the room
10/10 dict jokes
Bro got a PERSONALIZED email response haha.
That Stack Overflow employee knew it was you because of the mustache.
Lol. Great question. Great debial response. Great story. In conclusion. This was a video that totally deserves a like.
loooool best content on twitch and youtube
Yaya
And this, children, is why men are awesome.
Can't even take a breathe during the whole time reading the SO question, it really got me good!
I laughed so much. I have hiccups now. 😂😂
If you want to measure data and include pointers you can stack the data together and then measure the width of the contiguous block of memory. There's a Moment Like This right after a copying garbage collector is done where all the objects in the heap are now stacked together. maybe im misunderstanding the goal though
2:14 I JUST FALL OF MY CHAIR LAUGHING
This is one of the funniest vids I've seen.
The response of the moderation team is proof of their very dirty minds.
06:02 but remember, you don’t need the suit or the cape to be a real-life hero. it's more about what you do and how you help others (especially twitch chat and yt comments) KWKW
I've always wondered why the Golang people used the unfortunate abbreviation "cum" in their benchmark profiling tool, to refer to cumulative.
Maybe you should do a stack overflow question based on that.
this made me genuinely laugh (i checked and it's true) while the video didn't
dict move...
Trolling SO is the lord’s work
So, is trolling the Lord's work?
This man is a treasure
This is incredible.
OMG, I laughed so hard!
Thank you.
I didn't understood it at first glance, but when I got it I laughed very hard 🤣🤣🤣
DtsckOverflow is where fun goes to die.
this is too good
AdDICTed to being subscribed to this content
It is always morally correct to bully stack overflow.
sof is one of the best performing websites I have visited, it's simple and fast
This is a perfect question
They should have closed the already existing question as a duplicate of yours.
They have a dirty mind. I would not even have noticed it unless I was reading it out loud.
Nothing compares to the Oracle Community Forums.
That conference booth story 😂😂😂
GPT came just in time because moderators at Stack overflow are on power trips. Rather than answering questions they go off on tangents about etiquette and closing questions. FTS!
In bird culture, this is considered a dict move.
I love that I now have a recording of ThePrimeagen talking about measuring dicts (it doesn't sound like you're saying that 😅) should I turn it into a song?
That's genius !
I am dying this was so funny 😭😭😭😂
Legendary.
PICKLE DICT
literally 1984
jesus christ, prime
'Double'😏 entendres
twice the 0010 fun.
In the end of the video: "Don't worry @Theprimeagen I can take your dict in one byte" 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
woww this was so addictive
ADD - Dick- tive, said the hyperactive Richard!
did you find the solution?
Does he have a partner? That's the key. Not that I don't value a good dict joke even from a single, dateless geek. ;)
this channel is better than your main lol
The mustache was the tell shave it 😂
'Dict size matters.' Dr. Biggus Dictus. PHD (Pretty Huge Dict)
I hope you are proud of yourself.
Man text can sound catty. Grrrrrrr
im so distracted
People often act like the size of dict is not important. This indicates they only ever work with small dicts.
Legend !
Should be a script writer for Archer.
hello? it doesn't matter
Prime "Alexa, play my My dict by Micky Avalon"
This is pur gold
Legendary
A dict move, a bold dict move
A dict and bold move, one could say
If you could somehow type a dictionary into the conversation, that would be key and add value to the joke.
This was really funny
"He could smell I was the dick guy"
Stack Overflow --> Stuck over flaw ?
Gilles made the right choice leaving SO. You made the right choice becoming a dad. Halp I'm ad𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵ed to your vids
Only a matter of time before Paulson commits a sexual crime if he hasn't already
Fun Detected
"Big dicts are hard to come by. Although they provide a long, hard thrust, they consist of more bytes than most can chew." Dr. Hugh Mungus. PHD (Pretty Huge Dict)
No fun allowed!
that was hard
very addictive 😂
Beautifully crafted 👌🤌
In french we have the equivalent of this with the word "Bit" that mean exactly (not) the same thing of "DIct" xD
I might be the most dect guy in such questions 😂😂😂
But inside the team only I don't have the courage to say them here out loud 😂
Butt any way that was hilariously funny 😂
Damn, can't stop laughing
stack overflow moderation team sure has a dict up their cat