How much do floods, bushfires and droughts cost Australia? How much money do we waste sending overseas for oil instead of using Aussie renewable energy?
@@InfinityIsland2203 So creating a fuel efficiency standard, investing in new renewable projects and incentivising businesses to invest in renewables as well as producing solar panels domestically are not good ways of reducing emissions?
@@InfinityIsland2203 Try telling all those countries around the world who are at (or near) 100% renewables that it's a myth. P.S: South Australia already has 70% renewables, try getting with the times dinosaur. You are completely and utterly delusional.
Having your heater on isn't a cause of climate change. Emissions happen on the larger scale economy. Bringing down emissions doesn't require suffering and deprevation
That cost for nuclear is much more than wind and solar farms (with storage and transmission) if they last significantly longer than expected as you assume for nuclear.
@@Chrisplumbgas Better than drinking the LNP bleach. Negative gearing and capital gains tax causing the housing crisis we're in now by making it a speculation for property investors not a place to live, 30 years of LNP and not one instance of talking about breaking up the colesworth duopoly, Howard cutting taxes for multinational mining corporations to almost nothing and handing money out to them (and fixing up the messes they made with taxpayers money), we pay more to mining companies than we get back in tax; If they were taxed normally these are the things we could afford to have: Free uni, high speed rail, improved public health system, better education, no out of pocket costs at the doctor, and much much more. Instead these are things "we cannot afford", no we can't afford them because Gina needs another private jet. Mark my words, the fertility rate will drop close to 0 in this country because no one can afford kids, then we'll slowly slip into total extinction. That is, if something doesn't change right now.
We are being brought to our knees both economically and on a personal level meanwhile China is thumbing it's nose at the problem, perhaps we should tie our efforts to correspond with theirs. Our output is miniscule in comparison.
China is actually at 28.6% renewable energy, while Australia is only at 26.7%. We're also below the global average of 28.1%, and even Papua New Guinea is ahead of Australia at 40%.
@zen1647 True, but why is China still classed as a "developing" country? They also are responsible for 33% of total world CO2 emissions. Mostly because the rest of the world is happy to let them do all their manufacturing work.
how much of the atmosphere is C02 ? 421 millionths, ie 999,559 millionths is all the other gases. How much has C02 increased in the last 100 yrs ? 130 millionths .... what is the most abundant greenhouse gas ? water vapour ..... it varies by 20,000 to 40,000 millionths on a daily basis ....
Dr. Jennifer Rayner of the Climate Council (1.39 minutes) states 'Australia is on track to meet me our 2030 target' . And that 'it's great news because.....(wait for it) we actually need to slashing even further and faster'. But.....aren't we on track?
Biodiversity is depleting faster than planet is warming - end of keystone species - humans will collapse faster - if not CC action - Ecology collapse is real due to F Fuel pollutants/mining.
@@testicool013 without a brain your ancestors would never have survived without mining - how many generations ? I sometimes wonder what brain most of you have implanted.. brain washed
@@jamesaustralian9829 oh which mine can you give as a clear example of fulfilling all its obligations to water, air, soils, natural regeneration ..? Which also indicates you despise houses, or you live in a 'glorified' cave...?
@@testicool013 as to your ancestors wouldn't have had you without no mining or internet, as all your ancestors before you - as if mining began Australia or Western Civilisation or the oldest living Culture on Earth here...?
Two trillion dollars will be spent on renewables in 2024, whilst only one trillion will be spend on fossil fuels. That gap in favour of renewables changed around 2020 and is not reversing and that gap will get wider every year in favour of renewables and battery storage. Why? Becuase its cheaper. ABC kind of stuff. Levelised costs of renewables gets cheaper every year. Renewables are dollar driven. Call it consumer greed if you like. others call it common sense.
Overall, the economics of renewables, coupled with their environmental benefits and technological advancements, are driving the transition away from fossil fuels and towards a cleaner, more sustainable energy future.
Maybe the LNP don't understand the meaning of "FINITE" fossil fuels? 😮 Temperature on earth in last 8 years have been the warmest on record, each becoming warmer. Sea ice is disappearing. Scientists want action to save the one tiny planet in the universe with known life on it. Better than ignoring the problem.
@@davidthrift7593It's blindingly obvious - people with solar panels and batteries are cleaning up with the savings. And the technology will get even better and cheaper in the future.
CO2 emissions have plummeted in California over recent years due to deployment of renewables. They are well ahead of their Paris schedule. If they can do it, why not others ? The California example demonstrates that ambitious climate action is not only achievable, but can also yield significant economic, environmental, and social benefits. The California example underscores the importance of bold policy action, technological innovation, and public-private collaboration in driving the transition to a sustainable energy future. By emulating California's approach and leveraging its lessons learned, other regions can accelerate their own efforts to combat climate change and reap the economic, environmental, and social benefits of renewable energy deployment.
People fleeing California play their part in it's total emissions reduction, they lost a Congressional seat recently due to population decline. California also enjoys much higher power prices than other states and frequent blackouts.
![[Sub Thai] APT. - ROSÉ & Bruno Mars](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bYjhzP8x_uc/mqdefault.jpg)
![ไข้ขึ้นเลย! เมื่อแฝดโดนจัดเต็มวัคซีนครบ2เดือน🤒 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.54 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2VHItnyyvY/mqdefault.jpg)
The next election is going to be about the economy.
How much do floods, bushfires and droughts cost Australia? How much money do we waste sending overseas for oil instead of using Aussie renewable energy?
@@InfinityIsland2203 So creating a fuel efficiency standard, investing in new renewable projects and incentivising businesses to invest in renewables as well as producing solar panels domestically are not good ways of reducing emissions?
@@InfinityIsland2203 Try telling all those countries around the world who are at (or near) 100% renewables that it's a myth. P.S: South Australia already has 70% renewables, try getting with the times dinosaur. You are completely and utterly delusional.
@@mattl1250 so we can get rid of the extension cord to Victoria and new when the power goes off then.
The Project is the worst show in Australia.
Having your heater on isn't a cause of climate change. Emissions happen on the larger scale economy. Bringing down emissions doesn't require suffering and deprevation
The way the world is going, we’ll be all broke by 2030.
Good!!! He has my full support in doing so
The $12bn cost of a nuclear reactor is insignificant if they last for 80 years before needing to be replaced.
That cost for nuclear is much more than wind and solar farms (with storage and transmission) if they last significantly longer than expected as you assume for nuclear.
And do not need massive land clearing across the land to connect the solar and wind farms to the grid as it's already in place for nuclear.
Compact Rolls-Royce nuclear reactor's could replace coal fired power stations with much lower costs and use existing infrastructure!
Forget the Paris agreement it’s a lot of rubbish!!!!
Excellent Good News !
THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD 🍞.
Good!
Poor old David speers still a cheer leader for labour
He drank the poison kool aid at the abc . Lost forever in the abyss.
are you kidding? He's absolutely destroyed Insiders by bringing in all his Murdoch mates. He's a liberal butt boy!
@@Chrisplumbgas Better than drinking the LNP bleach. Negative gearing and capital gains tax causing the housing crisis we're in now by making it a speculation for property investors not a place to live, 30 years of LNP and not one instance of talking about breaking up the colesworth duopoly, Howard cutting taxes for multinational mining corporations to almost nothing and handing money out to them (and fixing up the messes they made with taxpayers money), we pay more to mining companies than we get back in tax; If they were taxed normally these are the things we could afford to have: Free uni, high speed rail, improved public health system, better education, no out of pocket costs at the doctor, and much much more. Instead these are things "we cannot afford", no we can't afford them because Gina needs another private jet. Mark my words, the fertility rate will drop close to 0 in this country because no one can afford kids, then we'll slowly slip into total extinction. That is, if something doesn't change right now.
Yup get rid of Bowen as well
We are being brought to our knees both economically and on a personal level meanwhile China is thumbing it's nose at the problem, perhaps we should tie our efforts to correspond with theirs. Our output is miniscule in comparison.
China is actually at 28.6% renewable energy, while Australia is only at 26.7%. We're also below the global average of 28.1%, and even Papua New Guinea is ahead of Australia at 40%.
@zen1647 True, but why is China still classed as a "developing" country? They also are responsible for 33% of total world CO2 emissions.
Mostly because the rest of the world is happy to let them do all their manufacturing work.
Good
If your in the Paris agreement your helping China Russia Iran !!
Dr Jennifer Rayner of Climate Council - Her PhD is in Political Science. Just what we need to solve our so called "climate emergency".
400ppm is not a climate emergency
@@lesnorton837 I was being sarcastic
Yes actually because reducing CO2 emissions enough to stop the climate from getting worse requires government intervention world wide.
Imagine the woke left project getting an expert on and the expert is a journalist from the woke left ABC. SMH
how much of the atmosphere is C02 ? 421 millionths, ie 999,559 millionths is all the other gases. How much has C02 increased in the last 100 yrs ? 130 millionths .... what is the most abundant greenhouse gas ? water vapour ..... it varies by 20,000 to 40,000 millionths on a daily basis ....
For all climate protestors: have you think of reducing hight consumption of everything before asking the word to di their bits.
Good. So he should.
Dr. Jennifer Rayner of the Climate Council (1.39 minutes) states 'Australia is on track to meet me our 2030 target' . And that 'it's great news because.....(wait for it) we actually need to slashing even further and faster'. But.....aren't we on track?
Biodiversity is depleting faster than planet is warming - end of keystone species - humans will collapse faster - if not CC action - Ecology collapse is real due to F Fuel pollutants/mining.
Wrong. Blame the housing developers because their impacting far more animal habitats than a mine ever will.
Yeah without mining you wouldn’t be able to post nonsense in the internet
@@testicool013 without a brain your ancestors would never have survived without mining - how many generations ? I sometimes wonder what brain most of you have implanted.. brain washed
@@jamesaustralian9829 oh which mine can you give as a clear example of fulfilling all its obligations to water, air, soils, natural regeneration ..? Which also indicates you despise houses, or you live in a 'glorified' cave...?
@@testicool013 as to your ancestors wouldn't have had you without no mining or internet, as all your ancestors before you - as if mining began Australia or Western Civilisation or the oldest living Culture on Earth here...?
Two trillion dollars will be spent on renewables in 2024, whilst only one trillion will be spend on fossil fuels. That gap in favour of renewables changed around 2020 and is not reversing and that gap will get wider every year in favour of renewables and battery storage. Why? Becuase its cheaper. ABC kind of stuff. Levelised costs of renewables gets cheaper every year. Renewables are dollar driven. Call it consumer greed if you like. others call it common sense.
Overall, the economics of renewables, coupled with their environmental benefits and technological advancements, are driving the transition away from fossil fuels and towards a cleaner, more sustainable energy future.
@@JoeyBlogs007lol
Maybe the LNP don't understand the meaning of "FINITE" fossil fuels? 😮 Temperature on earth in last 8 years have been the warmest on record, each becoming warmer. Sea ice is disappearing. Scientists want action to save the one tiny planet in the universe with known life on it. Better than ignoring the problem.
@@JoeyBlogs007 depends on who is doing the numbers......(cooking the books)
@@davidthrift7593It's blindingly obvious - people with solar panels and batteries are cleaning up with the savings. And the technology will get even better and cheaper in the future.
CO2 emissions have plummeted in California over recent years due to deployment of renewables. They are well ahead of their Paris schedule. If they can do it, why not others ? The California example demonstrates that ambitious climate action is not only achievable, but can also yield significant economic, environmental, and social benefits. The California example underscores the importance of bold policy action, technological innovation, and public-private collaboration in driving the transition to a sustainable energy future. By emulating California's approach and leveraging its lessons learned, other regions can accelerate their own efforts to combat climate change and reap the economic, environmental, and social benefits of renewable energy deployment.
People fleeing California play their part in it's total emissions reduction, they lost a Congressional seat recently due to population decline. California also enjoys much higher power prices than other states and frequent blackouts.
Yeah, California and even Texas are huge investors in renewable energy. It just makes so much sense!
You don't hate the project enough
Good pull out
Blah, blah, blah…
You little ripper
🌍💚♥️💜💙💚💛🧡❤🌎
RENEWABLES BEING ECONOMICALLY VIABLE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH NEEDING AN AGREEMENT TO ADOPT THEM