He was a fraud is all paid by pharmaceutical companies to test cocaine, which he only used recreationally, he should not be taught in schools, unless actually teaching what he really did
The subconscious definitely exists. I see defense mechanisms in people all the time and I even noticed that people understand what they are intuitively when they are analyzing behavior of other people even if they don't have any psychology training whatsoever. And it's definitely true that the unconscious mind sometimes manifests itself in dreams, though not to the degree that Freud predicted.
It's unfortunate when Freud is presented in such a negative light or in a caricatured way . Many of his theories were indeed wrong, but he was right about many things as well, and we now takes those things for granted and fail to attribute them to him (i.e. The unconscious, defenses, drives, transference, countertransference, the influence of our most formative years on our adult lives, etc.) Freud was a creative genius with some ideas that were undoubtedly flawed. But the field of psychology is indebted to him. Many people often joke about how Freud believed that all problems were simply related to one's parents, but there is a lot of empirical evidence for attachment theory (the idea that one's parent-child relationship sets the foundation for later relationships in life) and this began with Freud. While Freud ought to be critiqued, he must also be respected as well.
Yes, Practically all new theories about Psychology, attachment theory, humanistic, Neurolinguistics Modification and the lingo of Psychiatry, even themethodology for all Psychotherapy, is based in Freud
The field of psychology is still recovering from the damage done by Freud. Read "Freud: The Making of an Illusion". It exposes Freud for being nothing more than a self-serving, lying, reality-denying and power hungry destructive charlatan. Sigmund Freud wrecked the world, and we have been having to piece it back together ever since.
Well he didn't invent all treatments he played a part and inspired research. But it is necessary to be critical and not just take everything he said as factual and effective just because he is famous.
I personally believe that our list of "kooky psychologists" would be extremely long if we researched and wrote biographies on more of them. Actually, I think that's true of any occupation. People are straight up weird, and the key difference is that Freud's ego was (justly or unjustly) extremely massive, and thus he felt his ideas were all groundbreaking and wrote a lot on them and published those papers. Most people hide their addictions, weird sexual thoughts and fantasies, ideas about the genders, experiences in adolescence and puberty, and the kind of things Freud published. His poly linguistic status, honors, and other things are common indicators of high IQ and general genius level thought processing. He was a genius in the humanities. People who have such credentials usually get far more attention when they speak. But I truly believe his bizarre behaviors and ideas are just.. Human. We're weird. If you can't list 5 things that you do or have thought that are on par with Freud, you're either lying or have no self-introspection.
The issue isn't that he's weird. Being weird is human. It's that some of he's theories aren't scientific but he presents them as factual. That he had biased socio-political ideas that affected some of his work and that some of the theories just aren't applicable, realistic or relevant. This happens.
@@gquin9487 Were you under the impression that made any sense whatsoever when you wrote it? Like do you actually believe that you could demonstrate the veracity of anything you just said? Or are you aware of how patently false and quite humourous your comment is? Because if nothing else, it was pretty funny, at least to me.
@@reneg6391 I only saw this because of the other reply I just got, but I'll respond. Even though I genuinely don't care. Because "the issue" you're talking about is not what I was talking about in the slightest. It's literally irrelevant to my comment. It's not a discussion on Freud. It's a comment about how other people would be remembered as weirdos too if they shared the things Freud did with the public. That's all. Whatever your issue with Freud is, it's irrelevant to the comment, as valid or accurate as it may be.
@@ollipollii1932 Idk what you mean? I was talking about how we know a lot of the weird stuff Freud said and did, because he said it in public and wrote it down, so he's remembered as an anomaly, when in reality he's not that much weirder than most others who never said what they thought about out loud, or published any of it, so they're not remembered as weirdos. It's true of anything. Sexual deviants. Criminals. Drug addicts. Sex addicts. Liars. Whatever. If the person had that stuff recorded in public record, they'll be remembered for it, even if other people were far more prevalent, because it wasn't recorded about them. I feel like your comment was the only one that understood I wasn't endorsing Freud, but I don't know about the weird vs famous part. If anything, it'd be the poor are crazy and the rich are eccentric, as there are tons of famous people everyone knows were/are weird. But the reason we know was my point. It's recorded. People know about it. The secrets of others died with them and that's why they're not seen as weird. But everyone is to varying degrees. Freud just happens to be immortalized as a giant weirdo. My point was a direct response to the video being about how weird Freud was.
penguinistas Thank you! my sister is a psychotherapist and even her family says she has more problems dealing with reality than anyone they have ever known. In spite of teaching parenting classes, achieving several degrees and writing several papers, she is addicted to drugs and alcohol, was married to a gay man she insisted was straight, even though he told her he was gay, and on and on. I gave up trying to relate to her because it was hopeless. I always wonder how many patients killed themselves after being treated by her...
@Saitaina ...And yet you still use the term "oral fixation" as if you came up with the term yourself. Give credit where credit is due, the man coined the term and the only reason you think you have some kind of revelation regarding the topic is because he first studied it. And if you've read anything about his writings on stress and anxiety you'd know that whatever you're eluding to needs citation for obvious reasons. How is what Freud said any different than what you're eluding to? Hate on Freud all you want but the man was onto something. It's our job to piece it together. And that's what you did. But much of the credit goes to Freud for getting you to think that way.
I mean, using that logic we should attribute the Theory of Relativity to Galileo since he first coined the term, he was just wrong about it? Freud was insanely smart but a lot of his work is tarnished by his broken worldview and should be critiqued and improved on.
I love it when youtube channels make count down videos about large influential people such as Sigmund then throughout the video give subtle jabs. "These theories have been debunked" Ya ok dude. he's the father of psychology at the beginning then less than a minute in you bury the man. Toptenz, I'm very much aware of who Freud and who the hell are you guys?
The content of this video reflects a general lack of understanding of Freud's work. A significant portion his work has been validated empirically and can be found in Fisher & Greenberg's book, "The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy".
Though I dismiss psychoanalysis and psychosexual development, I do respect the work done on the levels of the mind. I find fascinating the interplay between the tiers as well as the notion that my lifetime of experiences lies intact in my unconscious mind. Sometimes, on Facebook, one of my high school or childhood friends will mention an event or person that plucks from those submerged depths my own memory of same. "Oh yes! And he . . . " Then I'll recount. But up until that current day's interaction, the memory rested in my unconscious, hibernating for four decades. Remarkable!
I don't think that Freud's psychosexual theories are unreasonable. When I reason with the stages, they are likely. I think that many people discredit his theories because they are graphic anatomically. Things as such make many people feel uncomfortable. When speech, ideas, people, and things don't conform to norms and standards, many people deem them unacceptable, such as Edgar Allen Poe. He was a brilliant writer and profound man who thought and wrote "out of the box." i Likely, there will never be another writer as brilliant and profound as Edgar. His supposed alcohol addiction had nothing to do with his literary genius. If people would be willing to think objectively instead of partially, they can open-their minds and see the likelihood in many things.
I don't mind graphic depictions. This may have been an argument in the past but not in tense modern context he's theories have been debunked and better methods and explanations have been found. If he was still alive he might have found a new way or elaborated differently but he isn't. And if he wasn't limited by his racist nd sexist world view. We can't be using outdated methods when we are trying to find the best treatments.
It has nothing to due with being uncomfortable. His theories were based entirely on hypothetical principles. he based them of no evidential basis and completely hypothesized them. There is nothing to accept because he was simply inaccurate regarding them.
Medically speaking unconscious already has a specific and important definition. It's wiser to avoid using the word because it's guaranteed to bring about confusion. It's also a foolish term; what is 'unconsciousness'? You can have thoughts that aren't thoughts, but how do you have thoughts that are UNthoughts?! Subconscious works better I think.
I too call it the SUBconscious. English is a very specific language and everyone (including Fraser Crane) in my view gets it wrong. After all, sleep is not being unconscious or repeatedly going to sleep would cause brain damage and when i called my gym teacher Dad i was obviously not unconscious. Is this POV anal? A submarine is not lagan, let alone derelict.
"the unconscious" is meant as an inner domain (containing elements unknown by the conscious mind.) subconscious refers to being below the barrier of consciousness (in the unconscious). it's p much a distinction without a difference, just differences in usage. seems to me that 'subconscious' is useful to refer to some element being OF that domain with out confusing it with the whole shebang of 'the unconscious'. but usage varies. some people call the unconscious itself 'the subconscious'.
You keep using the word "unconscious" when you should be using "subconscious". Unconscious means you are not awake. Subconscious means thoughts that you are not aware of. BIG difference. You can't do anything unconsciously except to sleep.
Hey there, so you are right unconscious means to be not awake in medical cases but when we talk about the brain, Freud theorised the typographical model: that the mind has a conscious, preconscious (otherwise known as subconscious) and an unconscious. The point he’s making with unconscious is that it’s our hidden impulses, desires and memories that we can’t access unless we remember things from dreams. Much like you said when we are unconscious we can’t remember when we wake up, we often forget what is in our dreams similarly. You can totally disagree this is all just Freuds theory, just wanted to help clear things up. Have a great day!
In the words of a song: "He's nuts, he's madder than coconuts" (frontier psychology). I'm really surprised you stuck to 10. You could have carried on all week.
When i see like these videos talking easily in that way about great men who all they did is just passing softly on earth among the mankind ..i just feel that the era of knowledge is over!
Not to sound incredibly sarcastic about this, but considering that men and women need to work together in order to create life could it be argued that we envy each other? .......... I'll go back in the corner now.
Really? Freud's obsession with eel reproduction didn't make this list? That seems a bit odd as it was one of his major works, and a serious (-ly weird) obsession in his life.
Simon, I think you should do something like s shirt change for every time you do a camera shot of your introduction to each of the 10 subjects on your videos. see if anyone notices.
I don't think that he meant that you were sexually attracted to your mother but attracted to her personality. I'm with a woman who does the same crazy shit as my mom but it looks nothing like her.
AJ Help Don't worry if anyone tries to tell you that. I've been married for 30 years to a man who probably married me because I was incredibly strong. So was his mom, but I was stronger. It actually made our marriage work, since I have no problem confronting anyone, and he is shy and retiring, but not weak, just quiet. I was like his mom, but only in a way that was important to him. I don't look anything like her, and she is very religious and I am a complete pagan with tatoos that cusses a lot. Who knew!
Sorry - Freud was quite a feminist .. the extent of the repression / possession / domination of women at THAT time was extreme / prevalent / etcetc ... Freud discovered that most women where ''buying in to it'' , and he told them so .. .. Many DID NOT LIKE THAT .. .. Many still don't ..
I just don't believe Freud was the originator of psychology...There were many women, believe it or not, who were actively studying why the 19th century spawned so much hysteria in the female sex. Since many of their papers were ignored, Freud was the public image. His daughter, Anna Freud was much better than he was, opening a whole new area up and helping numberless families and pioneering child psychology. Many people during the time of Freud thought he was ridiculously high and infantile. We aren't the only ones...He was very happy to "borrow" other discoveries and use them.
Freud's work is over a century old, and nothing scientific stand for that long without major changes... As only one of his theories has any evidence at all, except attachment theory, I think we can safely write off nearly everything he says......
70 % Of this is false. You need to read Freud, not the Myths about Freud. He wrote 24 books and tons of letters. in one of the books, he describes step by step how to interpret dreams and it is a methodology. The thing is that it is a very complex reading, his books have a high level of abstraction. People criticize the little bit and pieces without context that they believe they understand...anyway
The only way you should take freud seriously is in a philosophical context. Not in a scientific one. The first thing you learn in psychology is that freud is to psychology like the funny alcoholic war veteran uncle to a family who just like a broken clock is only right twice a day. May of his "scientific findings" have been disproved, also because he helped promote sexist and racist policies during the colonial era, with his pseudo-scientific findings.
I shall finally be first. but... but why am I taking so long to write this comment? is this ruining my chances? Oh.. OH NO!! WHAT HAVE I DONE???!! *WHAT HAVE I DOOOOONNNEEEEE??????!!!!!!!!*
I actually find something to womb envy. Construction worker for over 40 years and yes I like to step back look at the days accomplishment. So yeah I can understand the way a woman could look at her child raised well and feel accomplishment!
tylerhill40 He was Timothy Leary before Timothy Leary. In case you are younger, Mr. Leary told everyone to take LSD...unfortunately. Freud was a cocaine gangster!!!
(Not as much as his great grandsons, who live just around the corner from me. They look IDENTICAL to him and do more cocaine than anyone I've ever seen. The fact they can even walk is a minor miracle.)
Drugs are way more effective than the useless Psychology profession ever was. Best they ever achieved is having a person to talk to. Others mess you up even more. Fun fact, we are getting more and more psychiatrists and the number of patients is steadily climbing...
If you really want a subject that had more nuttier ideas than Freud dabble for a time in Krafft Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis; for the less pretentious we can cal it Psycho Sex. He predates Freud and his rise to fame, having died in 1902. I had heard of his book for years and finally ordered it through a local bookstore. (Yes!!! Two shocking facts, it was still in print and there was no Amazon nor internet.) His main theory seemed to me to be that all mental illness derives from some unacceptable sexual feeling: frustration, repressed desires, deviance, and others too numerous to recall. He referred to one homosexual patient, as I remember prettyl darned accurately, as "this poor demented pervert" and believed counselling him into being a heterosexual would solve all his irrational desires for men, Also in additional to their fear of being beaten, humiliated, jailed, and killed. He's pompous and reveals himself in every word and seems useless except st gay parties, when some of his homophobic pronouncements are read. I guess the laughter is worth the cost of the book.
wait. "The subconconscience was always considered a fact but..." It was? There has never been any scientific evidence of the subconscience, sorry- Did i miss something? Are there now X rays of it?
thin line between genius and insanity.
There usually is...
Or an overlap
I mean Im sure the coke didn’t help.
@@Don_liz Correct, take enough cocaine for long enough and people go psychotic. His theories were of course very sensible, grounded in reality... not.
He was a fraud is all paid by pharmaceutical companies to test cocaine, which he only used recreationally, he should not be taught in schools, unless actually teaching what he really did
Who's here after watching Freud
🤚🏻
🙋🏾♂️
Crazy showw
I didn't wanna be called out like that
It was awfull
I don't like cocaine, I just love the way it smells :)
I love the smell of cocaine in the morning.
“As in you like coke going up your nose.”
I never knew Johnny Sins was also a scientist.
And a youtube host
And a huge douchebag!
The concept of the unconcious mind, ego, and super ego were first articulated by Plato
The subconscious definitely exists. I see defense mechanisms in people all the time and I even noticed that people understand what they are intuitively when they are analyzing behavior of other people even if they don't have any psychology training whatsoever. And it's definitely true that the unconscious mind sometimes manifests itself in dreams, though not to the degree that Freud predicted.
It's unfortunate when Freud is presented in such a negative light or in a caricatured way . Many of his theories were indeed wrong, but he was right about many things as well, and we now takes those things for granted and fail to attribute them to him (i.e. The unconscious, defenses, drives, transference, countertransference, the influence of our most formative years on our adult lives, etc.) Freud was a creative genius with some ideas that were undoubtedly flawed. But the field of psychology is indebted to him. Many people often joke about how Freud believed that all problems were simply related to one's parents, but there is a lot of empirical evidence for attachment theory (the idea that one's parent-child relationship sets the foundation for later relationships in life) and this began with Freud. While Freud ought to be critiqued, he must also be respected as well.
Thank you! For giving unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar, as they say.
Loved this
WELL SAID!
Yes, Practically all new theories about Psychology, attachment theory, humanistic, Neurolinguistics Modification and the lingo of Psychiatry, even themethodology for all Psychotherapy, is based in Freud
The field of psychology is still recovering from the damage done by Freud. Read "Freud: The Making of an Illusion". It exposes Freud for being nothing more than a self-serving, lying, reality-denying and power hungry destructive charlatan. Sigmund Freud wrecked the world, and we have been having to piece it back together ever since.
If it wasn't for Freud psychology would not be where it is today. It really has saved many people.
Could it be that many found relief through talking about their problems
Well he didn't invent all treatments he played a part and inspired research. But it is necessary to be critical and not just take everything he said as factual and effective just because he is famous.
@@reneg6391 u r right
Cocaine is demonic criminal behaviour
Why is the Bald guy from Brazzers explaining me about Freud?
. . .so that you subscribe and when they have big numbers then they can run ads.Utube is an advertising company.So is Facebook.All about ads.
KnownNiche
Why are you so rude and a shame to whoever is related to you?
OOF
cause he knows marcelas Wallace?
KnownNiche lol
I personally believe that our list of "kooky psychologists" would be extremely long if we researched and wrote biographies on more of them. Actually, I think that's true of any occupation. People are straight up weird, and the key difference is that Freud's ego was (justly or unjustly) extremely massive, and thus he felt his ideas were all groundbreaking and wrote a lot on them and published those papers. Most people hide their addictions, weird sexual thoughts and fantasies, ideas about the genders, experiences in adolescence and puberty, and the kind of things Freud published. His poly linguistic status, honors, and other things are common indicators of high IQ and general genius level thought processing. He was a genius in the humanities. People who have such credentials usually get far more attention when they speak. But I truly believe his bizarre behaviors and ideas are just.. Human. We're weird. If you can't list 5 things that you do or have thought that are on par with Freud, you're either lying or have no self-introspection.
The issue isn't that he's weird. Being weird is human. It's that some of he's theories aren't scientific but he presents them as factual. That he had biased socio-political ideas that affected some of his work and that some of the theories just aren't applicable, realistic or relevant. This happens.
@@gquin9487 Were you under the impression that made any sense whatsoever when you wrote it? Like do you actually believe that you could demonstrate the veracity of anything you just said? Or are you aware of how patently false and quite humourous your comment is? Because if nothing else, it was pretty funny, at least to me.
@@reneg6391 I only saw this because of the other reply I just got, but I'll respond. Even though I genuinely don't care. Because "the issue" you're talking about is not what I was talking about in the slightest. It's literally irrelevant to my comment. It's not a discussion on Freud. It's a comment about how other people would be remembered as weirdos too if they shared the things Freud did with the public. That's all. Whatever your issue with Freud is, it's irrelevant to the comment, as valid or accurate as it may be.
@@ollipollii1932 Idk what you mean? I was talking about how we know a lot of the weird stuff Freud said and did, because he said it in public and wrote it down, so he's remembered as an anomaly, when in reality he's not that much weirder than most others who never said what they thought about out loud, or published any of it, so they're not remembered as weirdos.
It's true of anything. Sexual deviants. Criminals. Drug addicts. Sex addicts. Liars. Whatever. If the person had that stuff recorded in public record, they'll be remembered for it, even if other people were far more prevalent, because it wasn't recorded about them.
I feel like your comment was the only one that understood I wasn't endorsing Freud, but I don't know about the weird vs famous part. If anything, it'd be the poor are crazy and the rich are eccentric, as there are tons of famous people everyone knows were/are weird.
But the reason we know was my point. It's recorded. People know about it. The secrets of others died with them and that's why they're not seen as weird. But everyone is to varying degrees. Freud just happens to be immortalized as a giant weirdo. My point was a direct response to the video being about how weird Freud was.
I'm not sure that Freud would be the kookiest psychologist... because all the psychologists I've met are pretty weird.
penguinistas
Thank you! my sister is a psychotherapist and even her family says she has more problems dealing with reality than anyone they have ever known. In spite of teaching parenting classes, achieving several degrees and writing several papers, she is addicted to drugs and alcohol, was married to a gay man she insisted was straight, even though he told her he was gay, and on and on. I gave up trying to relate to her because it was hopeless. I always wonder how many patients killed themselves after being treated by her...
I agree i know a psycologist who told me that we are not human , we are just things
Psychologists are also people, so yeah, some can be weird, rude, unprofessional, or have any other number of issues :/
can confirm
Oral fixation is real, but not in the psycho-sexual way Freud uses, it's a stress and anxiety response.
Saitaina Malfoy Yes, and it shows up in autistic people sometimes as well, such as my cousins.
@Saitaina ...And yet you still use the term "oral fixation" as if you came up with the term yourself. Give credit where credit is due, the man coined the term and the only reason you think you have some kind of revelation regarding the topic is because he first studied it. And if you've read anything about his writings on stress and anxiety you'd know that whatever you're eluding to needs citation for obvious reasons. How is what Freud said any different than what you're eluding to? Hate on Freud all you want but the man was onto something. It's our job to piece it together. And that's what you did. But much of the credit goes to Freud for getting you to think that way.
I mean, using that logic we should attribute the Theory of Relativity to Galileo since he first coined the term, he was just wrong about it?
Freud was insanely smart but a lot of his work is tarnished by his broken worldview and should be critiqued and improved on.
Freud doesn't use sexuality in terms of genitalia. That a misunderstanding of the theory.
Yeah hence nail biting.
My grandfather was next door neighbors with this man when he lived in Austria.
Just found out his great great grandson owns Netflix something to think about
I love it when youtube channels make count down videos about large influential people such as Sigmund then throughout the video give subtle jabs. "These theories have been debunked" Ya ok dude. he's the father of psychology at the beginning then less than a minute in you bury the man. Toptenz, I'm very much aware of who Freud and who the hell are you guys?
The content of this video reflects a general lack of understanding of Freud's work. A significant portion his work has been validated empirically and can be found in Fisher & Greenberg's book, "The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy".
Though I dismiss psychoanalysis and psychosexual development, I do respect the work done on the levels of the mind. I find fascinating the interplay between the tiers as well as the notion that my lifetime of experiences lies intact in my unconscious mind. Sometimes, on Facebook, one of my high school or childhood friends will mention an event or person that plucks from those submerged depths my own memory of same. "Oh yes! And he . . . " Then I'll recount. But up until that current day's interaction, the memory rested in my unconscious, hibernating for four decades. Remarkable!
I don't think that Freud's psychosexual theories are unreasonable. When I reason with the stages, they are likely. I think that many people discredit his theories because they are graphic anatomically. Things as such make many people feel uncomfortable. When speech, ideas, people, and things don't conform to norms and standards, many people deem them unacceptable, such as Edgar Allen Poe. He was a brilliant writer and profound man who thought and wrote "out of the box." i Likely, there will never be another writer as brilliant and profound as Edgar. His supposed alcohol addiction had nothing to do with his literary genius. If people would be willing to think objectively instead of partially, they can open-their minds and see the likelihood in many things.
Can you be top comment
I don't mind graphic depictions. This may have been an argument in the past but not in tense modern context he's theories have been debunked and better methods and explanations have been found. If he was still alive he might have found a new way or elaborated differently but he isn't. And if he wasn't limited by his racist nd sexist world view. We can't be using outdated methods when we are trying to find the best treatments.
Scorpio Unleashed he was a man of his time which is to say deeply inundated with the beliefs of his time period
Best comment
It has nothing to due with being uncomfortable. His theories were based entirely on hypothetical principles. he based them of no evidential basis and completely hypothesized them. There is nothing to accept because he was simply inaccurate regarding them.
Nearly every time you said unconscious it should have been subconscious. The one time you used it correctly was when talking about dreams.
sn3192 Unconscious is physiological. Not conscious. Asleep. Knocked out.
Actually it's acceptable... I'm pretty sure it's only in the dictionary because of how people misused it, but unconscious can mean subconscious.
Medically speaking unconscious already has a specific and important definition. It's wiser to avoid using the word because it's guaranteed to bring about confusion. It's also a foolish term; what is 'unconsciousness'? You can have thoughts that aren't thoughts, but how do you have thoughts that are UNthoughts?! Subconscious works better I think.
I too call it the SUBconscious. English is a very specific language and everyone (including Fraser Crane) in my view gets it wrong. After all, sleep is not being unconscious or repeatedly going to sleep would cause brain damage and when i called my gym teacher Dad i was obviously not unconscious. Is this POV anal? A submarine is not lagan, let alone derelict.
"the unconscious" is meant as an inner domain (containing elements unknown by the conscious mind.)
subconscious refers to being below the barrier of consciousness (in the unconscious).
it's p much a distinction without a difference, just differences in usage. seems to me that 'subconscious' is useful to refer to some element being OF that domain with out confusing it with the whole shebang of 'the unconscious'. but usage varies. some people call the unconscious itself 'the subconscious'.
In my younger days I used too. It was insanely easy to lose weight and keep it off. But the chaos it causes spiritually wasn't worth it.
You keep using the word "unconscious" when you should be using "subconscious". Unconscious means you are not awake. Subconscious means thoughts that you are not aware of. BIG difference. You can't do anything unconsciously except to sleep.
You brick. Freud referred to the subconscious as the unconscious.
Hey there, so you are right unconscious means to be not awake in medical cases but when we talk about the brain, Freud theorised the typographical model: that the mind has a conscious, preconscious (otherwise known as subconscious) and an unconscious. The point he’s making with unconscious is that it’s our hidden impulses, desires and memories that we can’t access unless we remember things from dreams. Much like you said when we are unconscious we can’t remember when we wake up, we often forget what is in our dreams similarly. You can totally disagree this is all just Freuds theory, just wanted to help clear things up. Have a great day!
Now do one for his nephew, Edward Bernays. It would be far more insane...
I opine Carl Jung chose to prove Freud was insane and needed to improve the science.
In the words of a song: "He's nuts, he's madder than coconuts" (frontier psychology). I'm really surprised you stuck to 10. You could have carried on all week.
The song's title is "Frontier Psychiatrist" and the line goes "You're a nut! You're crazy in the coconut!".
We are never so defenseless against suffering as when we love.
When i see like these videos talking easily in that way about great men who all they did is just passing softly on earth among the mankind ..i just feel that the era of knowledge is over!
how long does it take you from idea to finished and uploaded video?
Not to sound incredibly sarcastic about this, but considering that men and women need to work together in order to create life could it be argued that we envy each other?
..........
I'll go back in the corner now.
Really? Freud's obsession with eel reproduction didn't make this list? That seems a bit odd as it was one of his major works, and a serious (-ly weird) obsession in his life.
Man... I cant imagine how much fun he must have been in a party...
Only if he shares.
I was aware that half these facts about Freud existed before this video and the other half I found to be surprising.
Simon, I think you should do something like s shirt change for every time you do a camera shot of your introduction to each of the 10 subjects on your videos. see if anyone notices.
I have to admit I got sucked into this wormhole of top tenz and the biographics YOU are killing my ability to SLEEP!!!
The fact the guy thats talking has a english accent makes me happy and satisfies me
He is the Holy Protector of the Universe. He is the Guardian of Mother Earth. Sent from Caodai. Blessed Almighty.
He was also a neurologist
I just took fear is a personality, so this is your interesting. Can you do one on Carl Jung?
I believe it was Carl Jung who developed the Electra Complex.
Thank you Simon that was most interesting *does best intellectual, glasses halfway down nose pose*
his psychosexual developmental theory has not been discredited!!!!???? Where is your info from?
Aren't we going to talk about "Karen" "Horney" who thought Freud was distorted and condescending ?
sometimes a bald head is just a bald head.
I'm here. after watching 'Freud' Series in Netflix! 😊
interesting video. thank you.
I don't think that he meant that you were sexually attracted to your mother but attracted to her personality. I'm with a woman who does the same crazy shit as my mom but it looks nothing like her.
AJ Help
Don't worry if anyone tries to tell you that. I've been married for 30 years to a man who probably married me because I was incredibly strong. So was his mom, but I was stronger. It actually made our marriage work, since I have no problem confronting anyone, and he is shy and retiring, but not weak, just quiet. I was like his mom, but only in a way that was important to him. I don't look anything like her, and she is very religious and I am a complete pagan with tatoos that cusses a lot. Who knew!
Sorry - Freud was quite a feminist .. the extent of the repression / possession / domination of women at THAT time was extreme / prevalent / etcetc ... Freud discovered that most women where ''buying in to it'' , and he told them so .. .. Many DID NOT LIKE THAT .. .. Many still don't ..
Please do not forget the Freud would not travel to the USA to testify in the Leopold-Loeb case.
Nice music adds
I just don't believe Freud was the originator of psychology...There were many women, believe it or not, who were actively studying why the 19th century spawned so much hysteria in the female sex. Since many of their papers were ignored, Freud was the public image. His daughter, Anna Freud was much better than he was, opening a whole new area up and helping numberless families and pioneering child psychology.
Many people during the time of Freud thought he was ridiculously high and infantile. We aren't the only ones...He was very happy to "borrow" other discoveries and use them.
Simon if you read the comments, do a biographics on freud!!!
You didn't even mention his theories on the Oedipus Complex...also , very controversial
Why are people who speak multiple languages usually pegged at the total of seven? You rarely hear about anybody who can speak six or eight languages?
They say a Freudian slip is when you say one thing, but you really mean your mother.
0:37 Slovenian,srbo- croatian, english, German, 4
A Little italien, french, spanish. ..7
So um... I'm supposing fact checks and objectivity are out of the window?
Correction: Jung came up with the Elektra complex not Freud.
top 10 uneducated rumors about Freud.
Are there information that are wrong in the video?
whats his full name?
can you do one one on pythagoras please
Freud's work is over a century old, and nothing scientific stand for that long without major changes... As only one of his theories has any evidence at all, except attachment theory, I think we can safely write off nearly everything he says......
How could you not include his insane relationship with Anna?
His daughter
Nothing on his anti-Semitic tendencies and how that impacted his relationship with Jung?
you should focus more on visual politics
He's right about women!
This is going to fun! XD
The only thing I didn't know was that he quit cigars for a year.
This man was nuttier than a fruitcake.
He is renowned, no doubt about that. But he was a total fraud. No doubt about that either.
How did the facts become insane?
I recommend a long course of analysis. At route, probably one fact wanted to shag another fact ...
Fact.
70 % Of this is false. You need to read Freud, not the Myths about Freud. He wrote 24 books and tons of letters. in one of the books, he describes step by step how to interpret dreams and it is a methodology. The thing is that it is a very complex reading, his books have a high level of abstraction. People criticize the little bit and pieces without context that they believe they understand...anyway
The only way you should take freud seriously is in a philosophical context. Not in a scientific one. The first thing you learn in psychology is that freud is to psychology like the funny alcoholic war veteran uncle to a family who just like a broken clock is only right twice a day. May of his "scientific findings" have been disproved, also because he helped promote sexist and racist policies during the colonial era, with his pseudo-scientific findings.
yea....
I shall finally be first. but... but why am I taking so long to write this comment? is this ruining my chances?
Oh.. OH NO!!
WHAT HAVE I DONE???!! *WHAT HAVE I DOOOOONNNEEEEE??????!!!!!!!!*
What difference does it make?
He also suffered for years with maralgia parasthetica
uh he was trama tized as a child don't judge too harsh
Impressive how biased this video is. I liked the background music, though. The rest is extremely superficial, sadly.
Sigmund Freud was Deep. Like Plato.
the most funny thing is that sigmund freud would find this presenter extremely obnoxious
I actually find something to womb envy. Construction worker for over 40 years and yes I like to step back look at the days accomplishment. So yeah I can understand the way a woman could look at her child raised well and feel accomplishment!
11 fact the presentation was hosted by a look alike of Freud.
He liked drugs?! 😂
tylerhill40
He was Timothy Leary before Timothy Leary. In case you are younger, Mr. Leary told everyone to take LSD...unfortunately. Freud was a cocaine gangster!!!
(Not as much as his great grandsons, who live just around the corner from me. They look IDENTICAL to him and do more cocaine than anyone I've ever seen. The fact they can even walk is a minor miracle.)
Dat "mysoginy" tho 🤣
his theories are not discredited
dude, this is cool
cocaine is a hell of a drug
Freud is my freaking hero
please please put that on a t-shirt, wear it daily to warn humanity
A total quack and a genius all at the same time
Drugs are way more effective than the useless Psychology profession ever was. Best they ever achieved is having a person to talk to. Others mess you up even more. Fun fact, we are getting more and more psychiatrists and the number of patients is steadily climbing...
2 facts in n i love the man
Churchill would be proud...
A very unfair analysis.
If you really want a subject that had more nuttier ideas than Freud dabble for a time in Krafft Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis; for the less pretentious we can cal it Psycho Sex. He predates Freud and his rise to fame, having died in 1902. I had heard of his book for years and finally ordered it through a local bookstore. (Yes!!! Two shocking facts, it was still in print and there was no Amazon nor internet.) His main theory seemed to me to be that all mental illness derives from some unacceptable sexual feeling: frustration, repressed desires, deviance, and others too numerous to recall. He referred to one homosexual patient, as I remember prettyl darned accurately, as "this poor demented pervert" and believed counselling him into being a heterosexual would solve all his irrational desires for men, Also in additional to their fear of being beaten, humiliated, jailed, and killed. He's pompous and reveals himself in every word and seems useless except st gay parties, when some of his homophobic pronouncements are read. I guess the laughter is worth the cost of the book.
Time to dig up Mr Webster again. (He has to redefine 'bat-sh*t crazy'.)
A very smart guy but a bad person and a bit of a sexual deviant. His “experiments” on princess alice and gay men was just brutal.
BELOVED FRUED WAS RIGHT ABOUT MOST THINGS HE SAID
Why this fellow cannot stand still, Sigmund ?
wait. "The subconconscience was always considered a fact but..." It was? There has never been any scientific evidence of the subconscience, sorry- Did i miss something? Are there now X rays of it?
Do one on Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda, cousin of Freud.
Actually, Freud was Bernays double uncle.
Biased towards Gentile cultures..
#10 COCAINE!!!!! Made me think of Pam from Archer. LOL!
Whoa "complete quack"?
if freud would be alive today he would
read more
Go Siggy Go!!!