My conversion to Islam | reverted Muslims

Why I converted to Islam
Reverted to Islam
Conversion stories
How do I revert to Islam from Buddhism
American singer Converted to Islam
Judaism to Islam
Hindu to Muslim
Religious conversions
How to revert to Islam
Why I convert to Islam
How I revert to Islam
How I became muslim
Americans converting to Islam
How many Americans converting to Islam?
Why Americans convert to Islam?
Convert to Islam from Christianity
How to convert to Islam from Christianity
Revert to Islam
Christian to Muslim
Reverted Muslims
Share your reverted story and inspire others to be reverted.
WhatsApp app [phone]
#lailahaillallah #islam #islamicvideo #viral #youtubevideos #allah #viralvideo #youtube #trend #viralvideo #trending #trendingvideo #conversion
#ytviral #allah #islamic #muslim
‪@islam_populer99‬ ‪@safaislamic‬ ‪@iamamuslim‬ ‪@MuslimConvertStories‬‪@MuslimConvertStories‬

[@hanssolos3699]

UH Manoa ❤ aloha ❤ لله أكب
❤

[@mountaidew]

Islam and christanity are two sides of the same coin. If you really want to bring in positive change in your life, become Hindu, Boudhist or Sikh. Hinduism out of it, Is unique. It gives choice of Bhakti (devotion) or Yoga ( spiritual uplift) or Karma ( work for others, work with passion) . This is the reason why Hinduis all over the world are successful.

[@YA-hm5zy]

Success in the world is temporary. This world is a material illusion. You should know better as a Hindu. Plus nobody wants a caste system, Hindu diaspora has had some Success in the world but not healthy Success you Don't enjoin hood and forbid evil. Infact you join and perpetuate the totally corrupt and unfair capitalist system to gain success. That is not success this is total failure. Infact I would not consider these 'successful' people Hindu. They are just opportunists. You need to learn more about Islam if you think it's just another Christianity. Good luck.

[@sheldonspider86]

Islam is the only religion on earth that worships the creator ALONE and is available for all mankind. All other religions are based on ethnicities and/or worships humans, animals and idols (like Hinduism is the religion of the people of the INDUS who worship animals & idols, Christians worship the human being Jesus, Buddhas do not even talk about God and Sihk is just wannabe Islam that only Punjabis practice). The Jews also worship the creator alone but they have chosen to keep this to themselves. Islam is the only clear religion where Indian, Arab, Black, White, Asian and all mankind stand together and worship the creator ALONE, in one language and with pure unchanged scripture from God. No other religion come close to this im sorry.

[@mountaidew]

@@sheldonspider86 let me try to word it differently. USA is the only country that measures the distance accurate ( in Miles and feet) and is available for the mankind. All others measure the distance in meter or yard, which is wrong. Does this makes sense?
Islam and Mohamad do not have monopoly on God. Even the concept of God, that they have, is stolen from other religions that existed before Mohamad. It is just that he did not understand it completly and could not grasp it with his limited intellect. Not blaming him. It is not a one person Job. He neither understood creator nor he understood creation. The question if creator exist is not simple to answer

[@mountaidew]

Asserting that a creator exists and has always existed involves engaging with philosophical and scientific perspectives. Mohamad just have one explanation " Trust Me Bro".
1. **Burden of Proof**: The claim that a creator exists and has always existed carries a burden of proof. It's essential to question what evidence supports this assertion beyond religious texts or personal belief.
2. **Problem of Infinite Regress**: If one argues that a creator has always existed, it raises the question of what caused the creator to exist. This leads to an infinite regress problem where each cause requires a prior cause, making the concept logically problematic.
3. **Alternative Explanations**: Scientifically, the universe's origins are explained through theories like the Big Bang, which describes the universe's expansion from a singular point. While this doesn't disprove a creator, it offers a naturalistic explanation without invoking a deity.
4. **Ockham's Razor**: This principle suggests that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. Invoking a creator who has always existed adds unnecessary complexity compared to explanations rooted in observable natural phenomena.
5. **Nature of Existence**: Existence of a creator implies a complex being with attributes like consciousness and intent. The existence of such a being is not supported by empirical evidence or scientific observation.
6. **Cultural and Psychological Influences**: Belief in a creator often stems from cultural, historical, and psychological factors rather than empirical evidence. These influences shape perceptions of existence but do not necessarily validate claims about a creator's existence

[@mountaidew]

@@sheldonspider86 assertion that a creator exists and has always existed involves engaging with philosophical and scientific perspectives. Mohamad has only one way to prove it " Trust me Bro"
1. **Burden of Proof**: The claim that a creator exists and has always existed carries a burden of proof. It's essential to question what evidence supports this assertion beyond religious texts or personal belief.
2. **Problem of Infinite Regress**: If one argues that a creator has always existed, it raises the question of what caused the creator to exist. This leads to an infinite regress problem where each cause requires a prior cause, making the concept logically problematic.
3. **Alternative Explanations**: Scientifically, the universe's origins are explained through theories like the Big Bang, which describes the universe's expansion from a singular point. While this doesn't disprove a creator, it offers a naturalistic explanation without invoking a deity.
4. **Ockham's Razor**: This principle suggests that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. Invoking a creator who has always existed adds unnecessary complexity compared to explanations rooted in observable natural phenomena.
5. **Nature of Existence**: Existence of a creator implies a complex being with attributes like consciousness and intent. The existence of such a being is not supported by empirical evidence or scientific observation.
6. **Cultural and Psychological Influences**: Belief in a creator often stems from cultural, historical, and psychological factors rather than empirical evidence. These influences shape perceptions of existence but do not necessarily validate claims about a creator's existence.
In summary, refuting the assertion that a creator exists and has always existed involves challenging the evidence, examining alternative explanations grounded in scientific inquiry, and addressing logical inconsistencies such as infinite regress. It's a complex topic that spans philosophy, theology, and science.