To those speaking without knowledge in the comments, hold your tongue until you know the ruling. May Allah guide our rulers (they are a test for us as well).
Abu Bakr al-Isma’ili (d.371H) when he said, “Know, May Allah have mercy on us and you, indeed the Madhab of Ahlul Hadith wa Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama’ah is….” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.35) And then he said about the rulers, “To supplicate for their rectification and that they turn towards being just.” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.55 no.58. (KSA: Maktabah Dar ul-Minhaj, 1431H. 2nd Edn. Ed. Jamal Azzun). This opposes backbiting rulers openly since its deception and treachery.
@@-------....___ You made cIaim, it's on you to provide dalil instead of being a good cariji & opposing sunna. & reply to your question is it depends on extent, now can you answer what is difference in applying Quran 5.44 & 47.
There are thousands of ignorants in the comments on insta and TH-cam that also make takfir of the Muslim rulers beyond simply insulting them. Sheikh Uthman’s talk displayed in the video is a basic refutation of both groups of people, whom insult the rulers without care to the proper Islamic procedure of doing so (in the Sharia). Remember, division and lack of care for the Rules of Allah are why the Ummah is so weak today. May Allah guide our Muslim rulers, and grant us victory over the disbelievers. The Rulers are a test for us (so let us not fail this test)❤.
@@Sufyaan-im5ir You are mostly if not fully weak because you bIame others & many times that you do wrong. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him delt with werse and still gave dawa. Sharia has 5 categories, Aqida, ibada, adab, trade and hudud. Generally learning the 1st category is before the next others as the sira shows, but they will not know their din and go and divide the umma with their extreme bIame like carijis and this why non Muslims use them.
As someone who dislikes many rulers in the Ummah, this is a very sensible approach. I would like to know though what IS the correct way to “call out” horrible rulers? I’ve yet to find info on this.
There are lectures available on TH-cam specially one done by ustadh abdurraham hasan . Excellent explanation with evidences from shariah. It will definitely benefit u and will remove ur doubts about what can be done with rulers specially tyrants. Alhamdulillah we have plenty of haduth for guiding us and wisdom behind them.
@ Can you point me to the lecture with this specific topic that’s reasonable to watch? There is no way I can sit through the 12 hour one. I saw his other videos after your recommendation and the consensus seems to be that the ruler must be listened to and obeyed (as long as he’s not commanding the haram). However, that doesn’t answer my question.
@@sammu it is reasonable to listen to whole session with a pen and nite book so that u can write down references given from books. Seeking knowledge is not easy . It needs sincerity and effort. This podcast are academic and it remives any doubt or shubuhaat a person might have. The reason why I asked u listen to this because it seems like u are not very knowledgeable about the hadiths of rulership. So it's better to listen to a podcast where counter questions were made by brother Shaheed. If u don't want to seek knowledge then basically u shouldn't talk about this issue.
question should be put differently is our inaction responsible for genocide in gaza or Allah will hold us accountable or just the muslim rulers. is muslim army be held accountable as well apart from the rules?
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168) We follow the Prophet ﷺ, not youtubers or twitter users sitting in their bedrooms, residing in the west and won't spare a drop of blood for this Ummah.
@@spawnnpwn4166not supporting / promoting thoghut doesn't necessarily mean waging physical war against them, but it's part of da"wah, calling everyone to Islam.
Imams Malik and Sufyan ath-Thawri when they said, “It is better to be under the rule of an oppressive ruler for 70 years than not have a ruler for even an hour.” (Tartib al-Madarik wa Taqrib al-Masalik (2/493), ad-Dibaj al-Madhab Fi Ma’rifah A’yan Ulama al-Madhab (1/125) Imam Ibn Taymiyyah echoes this by mentioning 60 years, wherein he said, “The wise people said 60 years with an unjust ruler is better than a night without a ruler.” (Majmu’a al-Fatawa (30/136) This shows the Salaf understood how to deal with oppressive rulers and would not want a believer to backbite them for 70 years! This explains it is better to have patience with an oppressive ruler then not have one and the ensuing harm.
I agree bashar was removed and ppl praise this. I do see the other side, the ruIer is soppose to be in charge of security and in nyc when electricity went out there was aIot of eviI, this was in 2003.
He is absolutely wrong. There is a huge benefit in criticizing rulers publicly, and that is the exposing the TRUTH. That is our obligation as Muslims. Funny how he diverted the talk of criticism into issue of takfir. Very bad of him to do that , implying that somehow criticizing rulers is takfir.
Do you not understand that the Sheikh is also covering more than one category of person? There are thousands of ignorants in the comments on insta and TH-cam that also make takfir of the Muslim rulers beyond simply insulting them. His talk displayed in the video is a basic refutation of both groups of people, whom insult the rulers without care to the proper Islamic methodology of doing so (in the Sharia).
Abu Bakr al-Isma’ili (d.371H) when he said, “Know, May Allah have mercy on us and you, indeed the Madhab of Ahlul Hadith wa Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama’ah is….” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.35) And then he said about the rulers, “To supplicate for their rectification and that they turn towards being just.” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.55 no.58. (KSA: Maktabah Dar ul-Minhaj, 1431H. 2nd Edn. Ed. Jamal Azzun). This opposes backbiting rulers openly since backbiting is deception and treachery.
Bro if you criticise a ruler publicly this can lead to revolt and violence and can lead up to even civil war. There is a lot of danger in that. Once you open this door Allahu Alam what it leads to.
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
There is a concept of Ahlul Haal Wal Aqd, which is derived fro Hussein RA's revolt agains Caliph Yazid. It is permissible to revolt against a ruler who has lost the confidence of influential members of the society (i.e. Ahlul Hal Wal Aqd)
@@-------....___ Cariji shia propaganda : Ali & Muawiya negotiated so let's assume their sons won't either, just say they rebeI. During negotiation with Sahaba shia of Ali cause wor as they thought Ali would hand them over, Ali didn't bIame Sahaba but fought his shia in Nahrawan.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Stop your propaganda ya madkhali klb. Answer this ya madkhali klb. Are the people in Syria now the rulers, who have to be obeyed? Madkhali Klb
Abu Bakrah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: _I heard Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) saying, "He who insults the rulers Allah will insult him."_ [At-Tirmidhi, who classified it as Hadith Hasan].
It has been narrated on the authority of Yahya b. Husain who learnt the tradition from his grandmother. She said that she heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering his sermon on the occasion of the Last Pilgrimage. He was saying: If a slave is appointed over you and he conducts your affairs according to the BOOK OF ALLAH, you should listen to him and obey (his orders). -Sahih Muslim Hadith No 1838
*A Befitting Punishment For The One Who Slanders Believers* قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : من قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال (أي: عصارة أهل النار) حتى يخرج مما قال… The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: “Whoever said about a believer that which is not in him (i.e it is not true), Allāh will place him in Radghatul Khibāl (filthy puss of the people of Hellfire) until he retracts what he said…” ● [صحيح الجامع للإمام الألباني ٦١٩٦]
@@mohduvesh3757 all these ruler related ahadiths apply for rightly appointed khalifas of the muslemeen not the self appointed oppressors who came to power by force through unjust means huge difference between the two
*A Befitting Punishment For The One Who Slanders Believers* قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : من قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال (أي: عصارة أهل النار) حتى يخرج مما قال… The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: “Whoever said about a believer that which is not in him (i.e it is not true), Allāh will place him in Radghatul Khibāl (filthy puss of the people of Hellfire) until he retracts what he said…” ● [صحيح الجامع للإمام الألباني ٦١٩٦]
RasulAllah ﷺ emphasised the legitimacy of rulers, specifically the *Khulafah* . Applying the Ahkaam meant for *legitimate* rulers to illegitimate ones is akin to applying the rules of marriage (nikah) to an unlawful relationship. Adhering to the Sunnah means holding the dictatorial governments of today who act as proxies for their western masters in Muslim lands, just as RasulAllah ﷺ accounted the Qurayshi leaders.
King of Bahrain who allied himself with the US and Britain to attack the Yemenies for their support of Gaza. But we have to ensure unawareness by hushing up. Sure Uthman.
@@hl8302 Seriously ? Yes yes, we are very sure that played a significant role in the decision making on the part of Bahrain. He became the emir ul jihad of Ahlus Sunnah by allying with the zio state, britain and the US. What nonsense. I don't even believe people with such strawman arguements really care about Ahlus Sunnah. In what Shari'ah is it allowed to ally with kuffar ? Ya Muslim!?! Why didn't our hero stop it then ? But now that the illegal zio state is pressured he wakes up. MashaAllah Who feeds you people such poor thoughts ?
If Muslim rulers were not puppet and passive … . Muslims would not have to migrate to USA . These celebrities TH-camrs earn good money. Umrah business and many privileges. If they are going against those rulers . It will affect their business.
@@HMD1986- Quran 13.11 says Allah won't change the condition of a ppl until they change what is in themselves. UnIess you in jaiI, to bIame the ruIer is an excuse to not work or bIame self in things ruIers are not involved in like calling local ppl to Islam salat or modesty or even study of the din.
Lmao why did he use “king of Bahrain” and “king of Brunei” as an example? He’s knows damn well which rulers and countries we are criticising but like a typical western Salafi *and btw I like Sheikh Uthman* he won’t say it like it is. But I guess this is a response 🤷🏾♂️
Those sitting in the west will criticise the muslim rulers in the east because they can. The public in the east are banned from criticising their rulers with fear of being killed or locked up for long periods of time. There are multiple examples of this. So with all due respect ‘Sheikh’ Uthman, we are taking what you say with a pinch of salt and a large handful of skepticism and concern.
The problem is when you try to take the situation of Imam Ahmad and apply it to today. This is illogical and impractical, don't disrespect the fiqh of Islam which the great scholars have explained and given to us! There's no khilafah today, tell me which ruler have you or I given bay'ah to? That's why if you look at the books of fiqh that explain how we conduct ourselves with rulers it's saying we have given our bay'ah to them, bay'ah has been given, etc... What we have today is not Islamic rulership (khilafah), it's Nation-States who themselves have given THEIR OWN Bay'ah to the likes of the United States, (NATO) or to Russia/China... This is not bay'ah To claim we have "Muslim rulers" today is like you're taking cow dung and smearing it all over the books of fiqh! May Allah guide us and save us from such kufr
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body. I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said: تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847, Grade: Sahih Al-Nawawi commented on these traditions, writing: وَأَمَّا الْخُرُوجُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَقِتَالُهُمْ فَحَرَامٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِنْ كَانُوا فَسَقَةً ظَالِمِينَ وَقَدْ تَظَاهَرَتِ الْأَحَادِيثُ بِمَعْنَى مَا ذَكَرْتُهُ وَأَجْمَعَ أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَنَّهُ لَا يَنْعَزِلُ السُّلْطَانُ بِالْفِسْقِ … وَسَبَبُ عَدَمِ انْعِزَالِهِ وَتَحْرِيمِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ مَا يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَإِرَاقَةِ الدِّمَاءِ وَفَسَادِ ذَاتِ الْبَيْنِ فَتَكُونُ الْمَفْسَدَةُ فِي عَزْلِهِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْهَا فِي بَقَائِهِ As for rebelling against the ruler and fighting him, it is forbidden by consensus of the Muslims, even if he is sinful and oppressive. I have mentioned the traditions that demonstrate this meaning. The people of the Sunnah have agreed that the ruler should not be removed due to his sinfulness… The reason his removal and rebellion against him is forbidden is because of what that entails of tribulations, bloodshed, and corruption, for the harm in removing the ruler is greater than letting him remain. Source: Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1840
This matter is so important that the righteous predecessors included it in their treatises on sound creed and Islamic theology, such as what was written by Imam al-Tahawi: وَلَا نَرَى الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى أَئِمَّتِنَا وَوُلَاةِ أُمُورِنَا وَإِنْ جَارُوا وَلَا نَدْعُو عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا نَنْزِعُ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَتِهِمْ وَنَرَى طَاعَتَهُمْ مِنْ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَرِيضَةً مَا لَمْ يَأْمُرُوا بِمَعْصِيَةٍ وَنَدْعُو لَهُمْ بِالصَّلَاحِ وَالْمُعَافَاةِ We do not rebel against our leaders or those in charge of our affairs, even if they are tyrannical. We do not supplicate against them, nor withdraw from obedience to them. We view obedience to them as obedience to Allah Almighty, an obligation, as long as they do not order disobedience to Allah. We supplicate on their behalf for righteousness and wellness. Source: al-ʻAqīdah al-Ṭaḥāwīyah 1/68
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
@@spawnnpwn4166 Firstly, which ruler have you or I given Bay'ah to? I dont recall giving Bay'ah to any nation-state. Or shall I give bay'ah to all of them? Which is not permissible you cant give bay'ah to multiple "rulers". Secondly, all of these nation states themselves dont care about being a ruler to the ummah they give allegiances to either NATO or Russia/China. Their policies are in accordance with what the kuffar dictate. So everything you've quoted here doesn't apply to modern times, we dont have a Muslim ruler/Khilafah that governs the affairs of the ummah.
I respect this sheikh a lot but I don't know how public criticism of the ruler will lead to bloodshed. We see in western media, criticism of western governments has not lead to bloodshed so why should we assume that it will in Muslim countries?
Regarding your question two recent examples happened for two different reasons. Bangladesh Islamic ruler got ousted for many a reasons bloodshed happened and the people won due to a corrupt ruler bringing the country into disrepute. Syria for over 40 years the Islamic rulers silencing all minorities locking them and eliminating them without any disregard and spent millions on various luxury cars have stolen millions of Syrian money, chemically killed thousands of people and was supported by the disbelieving west. Recently past few years top Sheikhs been making dua for Palestine and being pro Palestine have been taken and locked up by the modern Saudi Arabia why because the lslamic leaders son wants to make it tourist friendly rather a place of of monotheism. All of this is covered as minor signs leading to the major signs for the end of days.
Asalamualaikum The Grand Mosque seizure, also known as the siege of Calamity, was a siege that took place between 20 November and 4 December 1979 at the Grand Mosque of Mecca, the holiest Islamic site in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. The building was besieged by up to 600 militants under the leadership of Juhayman al-Otaybi, a Saudi anti-monarchy Islamist from the Otaibah tribe.
The claim that saudi arabia arrested people for making dua for Palestine is an utter lie. There are recent videos from less than a year ago of sheikh sudais and other regular people making dua for Palestine. Also a Palestinian who's family was killed came to hajj recently. As for the corrupt syrian regime they are kuffar. They are Nusayri alawites who's kufr are worse than the christians and Jews. The only reason rebellion was warned against was to prevent greater harm since obviously the leader had alot of power. This revolution only lead to other corrupt regimes gaining power. @@A_Nas78 Also publicly speaking against leaders isn't revolting but it is something that can lead to revolution. Like the case of Uthmaan رضي الله عنه. People spoke out against him exposing his weaknesses which ended up getting him killed. It's not "government scholars" or "madkhalis" or whatever you call them who say to obey the rulers It was Muhammad ﷺ who said this. Umm Salamah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: سَتَكُونُ أُمَرَاءُ فَتَعْرِفُونَ وَتُنْكِرُونَ فَمَنْ عَرَفَ بَرِئَ وَمَنْ أَنْكَرَ سَلِمَ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ رَضِيَ وَتَابَعَ There will be rulers from whom you will see both goodness and corruption. One who recognizes their evil and hates it will maintain his innocence, but one who is pleased with it and follows them will be sinful. It was said, “Shall we not fight them?” The Prophet said: لَا مَا صَلَّوْا No, as long as they pray. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1854, Grade: Sahih
@@valton12 There is major or minor kuffer. Alot of carijis will accuse ruIers of major kuffer faIsely. They will quote Quran 5.44 often & Ieave verse 47 which also gives context.
For one. Following the correct Islamic procedure in advising the Muslim rulers (instead of recklessly parading insults) will unify the Ummah to at least a little degree, InshaAllah. If we do what you call towards, we will have more countries like Libya and Iraq. Division amongst ourselves helps the Zionists more than what you hope to achieve by insulting our rulers will ever do.
@@dynodie The problem is when you try to take the situation of Imam Ahmad and apply it to today. This is illogical and impractical, don't disrespect the fiqh of Islam which the great scholars have explained and given to us! There's no khilafah today, tell me which ruler have you or I given bay'ah to? That's why if you look at the books of fiqh that explain how we conduct ourselves with rulers it's saying we have given our bay'ah to them, bay'ah has been given, etc... What we have today is not Islamic rulership (khilafah), it's Nation-States who themselves have given THEIR OWN Bay'ah to the likes of the United States, (NATO) or to Russia/China... This is not bay'ah To claim we have "Muslim rulers" today is like you're taking cow dung and smearing it all over the books of fiqh! May Allah guide us and save us from such kufr
@dynodie ofcourse we all try, but when it comes to general legislation being ruled over the land, it must be the law of Allah. If not, then he has rejected The quran. If the law is judging between the people and you follow your desire or to cause thulim ( transgression ), then this is kufr duna kufr. When does it become kufr. It's when you take a ruling and replace it with another. example, the zaani ( adulterer ) is punished with 100 lashes, but then the ruler has a different legislation where it ruled that they serve 2 decades in prison. This is tabdeel, which leads one out of thebfold of islam. Wallahu Alam
@@banu_diini You cannot make kufr of anyone in Islam without following the proper Islamic procedure (otherwise, according to you, all countries are somehow kafir). This is the way of the Khawarij. th-cam.com/video/FlRZ3kna0kU/w-d-xo.html
There were many times during the Khulafah ar Rashid and the times of the Ummayad and Abbadsid where if people felt they had been wronged would publicly call on the rulers for justice. The only reason some people shy away from the criticism of rulers is because the institutions they graduated from are funded by those said rulers. Muhammed bin Sultan has openly pursued a policy of deislamasing Saudi Arabian society but you will never hear a single word of criticism from them. God in Surah Tawbah says the Christians and jews have taken their priest's and rabbis as their God. Why did He say that? Its not because they worship them but they make halal what is haram and vice versa. In UAE they made zina halal which of them spoke out against it ? It was the Sunnah of every messenger to take the cause of the weak and oppressed none of them were ever on the side of tyrants and oppressers
Sins in Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 Shaykh Sulaymān Ar-Ruḥaylī حفظه الله: The more Tawḥīd, Sunnah and obedience there is in a country, the more that country is loved. In KSA, Tawḥīd is apparent and the Sunnah is apparent, so it's loved more. Yes, there are sins, but the intelligent one looks at the overall good that is present. Tawḥīd is manifest; there are no graves being worshipped and no one besides Allāh is being called upon. Also, the Sunnah is manifest - banners of innovation are not being raised. In addition, there are many other forms of goodness that are apparent. This doesn't mean that we be pleased with sins and we let them increase. No, rather we strive, and the least we can do is to supplicate for the well-being of the rulers and the country and that Allāh distances them from sins. If a person is able to advise the ruler in a befitting manner, in a way that maintains his prestige and in private, then it's obligatory upon him to do so. And the one who is able to pass on the message to the scholars in a respectable manner, then that is what is obligatory upon him. As for using sins that are happening in a country to destroy the country, then this is a corrupt way. Attacking the rulers and the country due to sins, making and spreading clips and speaking against them from pulpits, is a corrupt method and will not lead to rectification. A Muslim hates all sins in all countries, and the presence of sins pains his heart. However, the righteous one seeking rectification employs legislated means to bring about change. He doesn't become happy when he sees sins and starts spreading them as if though it's ʿEid - "O look, such-and-such concert is happening". This is not rectification. This is why the methodology of the Salaf is one which is sound and brings about rectification. The methodology of the Salaf is one which is just and balanced and it adheres to correct legislated principles.
@mohammadnaeemalam4159 walaykumusalaam. Wasn't that proven to be false AI trick? What is the advice given to us by Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam in regards to dealing with rulers?
@@ExtremeShez rulers, like the Khalifa, and those he appoints, that rule with Sharia. Remember, as long as they rule by the book of Allah SWT. Madkhali klb
Who is funding Israel? Why do you have more hate for Muslim rulers than the actual Zionists that fund Israel militarily and monetarily? Do you know what Israel likes more than what you have mentioned above? A divided, weak, and fractured Ummah.
Why do you show more hate towards the Muslim rulers than the actual enemies of Islam amongst the world nations (who are the ones funding and granting Israel military support)? You know what Israel loves more? That the Muslims remain divided and further cripple themselves by turning against the Rulers. What do you think Israel prefers, fake diplomatic smiles, or for more of our nations to end up like Libya and Iraq? We are brothers. We should be making dua for our Muslim rulers, and not act against them. They are a test for us, so let us succeed, inshaAllah.
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
Funny how all these puppet speakers give uzr to the murtad taghut rulers but start barkin quickly against mujhdin calling them agents of yahud/extreme etc
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
@@spawnnpwn4166yes the key word is a “muslim” leader who rules by the book of allah not manmade legislations. Please read something before you send it. There are no “muslim” leaders today
Exactly. Let the Mujahideen conquer and rule a land, then these very people will be at the forefront calling them Khawaarij, kaafir, agents of Israel, etc. Then there's no holding your tongue and advising the Muslim ruler in private.
@spawnnpwn4166 The people you are addressing do not hold the advise of scholars as guidance. They are driven by desires which are driven by the shayateen. May Allah guide us and them
There are rules and regulation in accounting the ruler. But a ruler that implements islam. What is the ruling for the ones that dont as is the case for all of them today. Bloodshed in the ummah im sorry but there has been blood shed anyway. 100 years without islam and we have 22 million Muslims dead estimates. Just saying people sitting in there rooms and cursing rulers is a mockery to the scholars who are actually putting their lives at risk for the deen. Its like me saying all the bible bashing lot wanna do is make secular converts while the lands of islam has no islam. This guy should stick to comparative religion debates as he clearly doesnt know politics.
@@infj5196 yes, but the problem is MANY Sahaba participated in the revolt against Yazeed. Yazeed was clearly appointed as the Ameer by his father Muawiya RA. I repeat.. MANY sahaba participated in the revolt.
@@infj5196 It is relevant because we need to be consistence with other Usool of Fiqh which takes into consideration the Ijma of the Sahaba. We need to understand the Hadith like how the majority of the Sahaba understood it
@@TablighiJamaat-sh6wc Theres no ijma of sahabah that we can rebel against Muslim rulers. The CLEAR evidence from sahih hadiths prove that its HARAM to rebel against Muslim rulers
If the leaders cant handle criticism they should really consider a new job role ! o wait they cant becuase its a Monarch ! and it isnt a democracy .. One rule with no change !
How can an ordinary person advise a muslim leader? Genuine question .. also its not just about kufr.. people have concerns with what muslim leaders do, like some allowing hindu temples in muslim lands etc, so is an ordinary person not allowed to comment on what these leaders are doing? Like if I said, “its very disappointing that Saudi leaders are secularizing the country” is that sinful to say that???
@@infj5196 mbs is not the ruler of Saudi so if people criticise him they aren't committing sins. I'm not going to go as low as u sectarian Salafies lying in order to defend rulers who don't care about Islam and Muslims. So you lie and speak ill of rulers
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159 I am telling you to Iearn Quran 13.11. In an interview a Saudi said we allow entertainment because ppl Ieave, so they should stay and support Saudi for Islam, not entertainment.
To those speaking without knowledge in the comments, hold your tongue until you know the ruling. May Allah guide our rulers (they are a test for us as well).
Yeah, but you're quick to speak in all other matters, except when it comes to the slaughter of your brothers.
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159
They took hundreds of thousands of refugis from there & Styria & Yemen & so forth.
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159
They hundreds of thousands of refugis. What did you do? Just bIame others is why you are daif.
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159
Saudi has hundreds of thousands of ppl from PaIistine, what did you do? Talk of others?
I mean military action none
Abu Bakr al-Isma’ili (d.371H) when he said, “Know, May Allah have mercy on us and you, indeed the Madhab of Ahlul Hadith wa Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama’ah is….” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.35)
And then he said about the rulers, “To supplicate for their rectification and that they turn towards being just.” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.55 no.58. (KSA: Maktabah Dar ul-Minhaj, 1431H. 2nd Edn. Ed. Jamal Azzun). This opposes backbiting rulers openly since its deception and treachery.
@@ExtremeShez madkhali, even if the ruler rules by man-made laws?
@-------....___ What the man made laws?
@ if you don’t even know, why you commenting everywhere like a good madkhali
@@-------....___
You made cIaim, it's on you to provide dalil instead of being a good cariji & opposing sunna. & reply to your question is it depends on extent, now can you answer what is difference in applying Quran 5.44 & 47.
@ iskt madkhali. Answer this. If MBS took your 0mk, would you hear and obey like a good madkhali klb?
There are thousands of ignorants in the comments on insta and TH-cam that also make takfir of the Muslim rulers beyond simply insulting them. Sheikh Uthman’s talk displayed in the video is a basic refutation of both groups of people, whom insult the rulers without care to the proper Islamic procedure of doing so (in the Sharia).
Remember, division and lack of care for the Rules of Allah are why the Ummah is so weak today.
May Allah guide our Muslim rulers, and grant us victory over the disbelievers.
The Rulers are a test for us (so let us not fail this test)❤.
We are weak because of the “scholars” or the “taghut leaders”
Ameen
@@Sufyaan-im5irwhy can't u do something about it? Sitting in ur comfort zone and calling scholars and rulers taghut. 😂😂😂
@hasinaakter2903 He will never become a scholar unfortunately with that attitude. That's why he hides behind a screen.
@@Sufyaan-im5ir
You are mostly if not fully weak because you bIame others & many times that you do wrong.
Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him delt with werse and still gave dawa.
Sharia has 5 categories, Aqida, ibada, adab, trade and hudud.
Generally learning the 1st category is before the next others as the sira shows, but they will not know their din and go and divide the umma with their extreme bIame like carijis and this why non Muslims use them.
As someone who dislikes many rulers in the Ummah, this is a very sensible approach. I would like to know though what IS the correct way to “call out” horrible rulers? I’ve yet to find info on this.
There are lectures available on TH-cam specially one done by ustadh abdurraham hasan . Excellent explanation with evidences from shariah. It will definitely benefit u and will remove ur doubts about what can be done with rulers specially tyrants. Alhamdulillah we have plenty of haduth for guiding us and wisdom behind them.
@
Can you point me to the lecture with this specific topic that’s reasonable to watch? There is no way I can sit through the 12 hour one. I saw his other videos after your recommendation and the consensus seems to be that the ruler must be listened to and obeyed (as long as he’s not commanding the haram). However, that doesn’t answer my question.
@sammu The question you should be asking yourself is, will Allah hold you to account for what the Rulers did or what you did in this life?
@@sammu it is reasonable to listen to whole session with a pen and nite book so that u can write down references given from books. Seeking knowledge is not easy . It needs sincerity and effort. This podcast are academic and it remives any doubt or shubuhaat a person might have. The reason why I asked u listen to this because it seems like u are not very knowledgeable about the hadiths of rulership. So it's better to listen to a podcast where counter questions were made by brother Shaheed. If u don't want to seek knowledge then basically u shouldn't talk about this issue.
If you don't know, you're not the one that should be calling them out. Simple.
question should be put differently is our inaction responsible for genocide in gaza or Allah will hold us accountable or just the muslim rulers. is muslim army be held accountable as well apart from the rules?
Al wala wal bara do you know or do you only know to promote to vote for an American taghut ?
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
We follow the Prophet ﷺ, not youtubers or twitter users sitting in their bedrooms, residing in the west and won't spare a drop of blood for this Ummah.
@@spawnnpwn4166 I dont follow a ashari who not repented
@@spawnnpwn4166not supporting / promoting thoghut doesn't necessarily mean waging physical war against them, but it's part of da"wah, calling everyone to Islam.
@@spawnnpwn4166
Alot of these carijis Iie on Islam, Iie and oppose Muslims, and werk for non Muslims like lsiI, Usa-ma, lran and so forth.
Carijis tend to :
1. Iie on Islam.
2. Exagerate errors and spIit the umma with wor.
3. Werk for the kuffar.
Imams Malik and Sufyan ath-Thawri when they said, “It is better to be under the rule of an oppressive ruler for 70 years than not have a ruler for even an hour.” (Tartib al-Madarik wa Taqrib al-Masalik (2/493), ad-Dibaj al-Madhab Fi Ma’rifah A’yan Ulama al-Madhab (1/125)
Imam Ibn Taymiyyah echoes this by mentioning 60 years, wherein he said, “The wise people said 60 years with an unjust ruler is better than a night without a ruler.” (Majmu’a al-Fatawa (30/136)
This shows the Salaf understood how to deal with oppressive rulers and would not want a believer to backbite them for 70 years! This explains it is better to have patience with an oppressive ruler then not have one and the ensuing harm.
They are oppressive but they rule with the sharia of Allah big fact because these tawagheet doesnt rule with the sharia
This needs a broader explanation from various ppl of knowledge from different positions. Not just take a few sentences literally and finish.
@navinstrument8353 Which people of knowledge do you refer too?
I agree bashar was removed and ppl praise this.
I do see the other side, the ruIer is soppose to be in charge of security and in nyc when electricity went out there was aIot of eviI, this was in 2003.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 madkhali klb, does MBS own your f4mily, and can he make mutah with anyone he wants?
He is absolutely wrong. There is a huge benefit in criticizing rulers publicly, and that is the exposing the TRUTH. That is our obligation as Muslims.
Funny how he diverted the talk of criticism into issue of takfir. Very bad of him to do that , implying that somehow criticizing rulers is takfir.
Do you not understand that the Sheikh is also covering more than one category of person? There are thousands of ignorants in the comments on insta and TH-cam that also make takfir of the Muslim rulers beyond simply insulting them. His talk displayed in the video is a basic refutation of both groups of people, whom insult the rulers without care to the proper Islamic methodology of doing so (in the Sharia).
When the Prophet forbade criticizing ruler why are you saying there is benefit in it? Do you know more than the Prophet?
The problem is laymen criticising rulers and they don't even know the conditions of Salaat. 😂
Abu Bakr al-Isma’ili (d.371H) when he said, “Know, May Allah have mercy on us and you, indeed the Madhab of Ahlul Hadith wa Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama’ah is….” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.35)
And then he said about the rulers, “To supplicate for their rectification and that they turn towards being just.” (Kitab I’tiqad Ahlus Sunnah p.55 no.58. (KSA: Maktabah Dar ul-Minhaj, 1431H. 2nd Edn. Ed. Jamal Azzun).
This opposes backbiting rulers openly since backbiting is deception and treachery.
Bro if you criticise a ruler publicly this can lead to revolt and violence and can lead up to even civil war.
There is a lot of danger in that.
Once you open this door Allahu Alam what it leads to.
masyaAllah ....
may Allah protect all of our ustadzs
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
There is a concept of Ahlul Haal Wal Aqd, which is derived fro Hussein RA's revolt agains Caliph Yazid. It is permissible to revolt against a ruler who has lost the confidence of influential members of the society (i.e. Ahlul Hal Wal Aqd)
@@TablighiJamaat-sh6wc
Husayn didn't rebeI.
Shia Iied to him and Iead to his deth.
You support that?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 madkhali propaganda: Husayn RA didn’t rebel l0l
@@-------....___
Cariji shia propaganda : Ali & Muawiya negotiated so let's assume their sons won't either, just say they rebeI.
During negotiation with Sahaba shia of Ali cause wor as they thought Ali would hand them over, Ali didn't bIame Sahaba but fought his shia in Nahrawan.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Stop your propaganda ya madkhali klb.
Answer this ya madkhali klb. Are the people in Syria now the rulers, who have to be obeyed?
Madkhali Klb
Abu Bakrah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:
_I heard Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) saying, "He who insults the rulers Allah will insult him."_
[At-Tirmidhi, who classified it as Hadith Hasan].
It has been narrated on the authority of Yahya b. Husain who learnt the tradition from his grandmother. She said that she heard the Prophet (ﷺ) delivering his sermon on the occasion of the Last Pilgrimage. He was saying:
If a slave is appointed over you and he conducts your affairs according to the BOOK OF ALLAH, you should listen to him and obey (his orders).
-Sahih Muslim Hadith No 1838
@mohduvesh3757 Beautiful hadith.
*A Befitting Punishment For The One Who Slanders Believers*
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : من قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال (أي: عصارة أهل النار) حتى يخرج مما قال…
The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: “Whoever said about a believer that which is not in him (i.e it is not true), Allāh will place him in Radghatul Khibāl (filthy puss of the people of Hellfire) until he retracts what he said…”
● [صحيح الجامع للإمام الألباني ٦١٩٦]
@@mohduvesh3757 all these ruler related ahadiths apply for rightly appointed khalifas of the muslemeen not the self appointed oppressors who came to power by force through unjust means huge difference between the two
@@mohammedshoaib-tq6hb
Hadith says obey ruIer even if an Ethiopian abd comes to power, no?
In other hadith it says obey in good.
*A Befitting Punishment For The One Who Slanders Believers*
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : من قال في مؤمن ما ليس فيه أسكنه الله ردغة الخبال (أي: عصارة أهل النار) حتى يخرج مما قال…
The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: “Whoever said about a believer that which is not in him (i.e it is not true), Allāh will place him in Radghatul Khibāl (filthy puss of the people of Hellfire) until he retracts what he said…”
● [صحيح الجامع للإمام الألباني ٦١٩٦]
RasulAllah ﷺ emphasised the legitimacy of rulers, specifically the *Khulafah* . Applying the Ahkaam meant for *legitimate* rulers to illegitimate ones is akin to applying the rules of marriage (nikah) to an unlawful relationship. Adhering to the Sunnah means holding the dictatorial governments of today who act as proxies for their western masters in Muslim lands, just as RasulAllah ﷺ accounted the Qurayshi leaders.
King of Bahrain who allied himself with the US and Britain to attack the Yemenies for their support of Gaza. But we have to ensure unawareness by hushing up. Sure Uthman.
Yes let's forget these same Houthi massacred the Sunnis in huge numbers. That part is not important is it?
@@hl8302
Seriously ?
Yes yes, we are very sure that played a significant role in the decision making on the part of Bahrain.
He became the emir ul jihad of Ahlus Sunnah by allying with the zio state, britain and the US. What nonsense.
I don't even believe people with such strawman arguements really care about Ahlus Sunnah. In what Shari'ah is it allowed to ally with kuffar ? Ya Muslim!?!
Why didn't our hero stop it then ? But now that the illegal zio state is pressured he wakes up. MashaAllah
Who feeds you people such poor thoughts ?
If Muslim rulers were not puppet and passive … . Muslims would not have to migrate to USA . These celebrities TH-camrs earn good money. Umrah business and many privileges. If they are going against those rulers . It will affect their business.
@@HMD1986-
Quran 13.11 says Allah won't change the condition of a ppl until they change what is in themselves.
UnIess you in jaiI, to bIame the ruIer is an excuse to not work or bIame self in things ruIers are not involved in like calling local ppl to Islam salat or modesty or even study of the din.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 madkhali klb, ibn-al-mutah
The king of Bahrein choice was so random but funny😂😅
Lmao why did he use “king of Bahrain” and “king of Brunei” as an example? He’s knows damn well which rulers and countries we are criticising but like a typical western Salafi *and btw I like Sheikh Uthman* he won’t say it like it is. But I guess this is a response 🤷🏾♂️
Those sitting in the west will criticise the muslim rulers in the east because they can. The public in the east are banned from criticising their rulers with fear of being killed or locked up for long periods of time. There are multiple examples of this.
So with all due respect ‘Sheikh’ Uthman, we are taking what you say with a pinch of salt and a large handful of skepticism and concern.
The problem is when you try to take the situation of Imam Ahmad and apply it to today. This is illogical and impractical, don't disrespect the fiqh of Islam which the great scholars have explained and given to us!
There's no khilafah today, tell me which ruler have you or I given bay'ah to? That's why if you look at the books of fiqh that explain how we conduct ourselves with rulers it's saying we have given our bay'ah to them, bay'ah has been given, etc...
What we have today is not Islamic rulership (khilafah), it's Nation-States who themselves have given THEIR OWN Bay'ah to the likes of the United States, (NATO) or to Russia/China... This is not bay'ah
To claim we have "Muslim rulers" today is like you're taking cow dung and smearing it all over the books of fiqh! May Allah guide us and save us from such kufr
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ
Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.
I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said:
تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ
You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847, Grade: Sahih
Al-Nawawi commented on these traditions, writing:
وَأَمَّا الْخُرُوجُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَقِتَالُهُمْ فَحَرَامٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِنْ كَانُوا فَسَقَةً ظَالِمِينَ وَقَدْ تَظَاهَرَتِ الْأَحَادِيثُ بِمَعْنَى مَا ذَكَرْتُهُ وَأَجْمَعَ أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَنَّهُ لَا يَنْعَزِلُ السُّلْطَانُ بِالْفِسْقِ … وَسَبَبُ عَدَمِ انْعِزَالِهِ وَتَحْرِيمِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ مَا يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَإِرَاقَةِ الدِّمَاءِ وَفَسَادِ ذَاتِ الْبَيْنِ فَتَكُونُ الْمَفْسَدَةُ فِي عَزْلِهِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْهَا فِي بَقَائِهِ
As for rebelling against the ruler and fighting him, it is forbidden by consensus of the Muslims, even if he is sinful and oppressive. I have mentioned the traditions that demonstrate this meaning. The people of the Sunnah have agreed that the ruler should not be removed due to his sinfulness… The reason his removal and rebellion against him is forbidden is because of what that entails of tribulations, bloodshed, and corruption, for the harm in removing the ruler is greater than letting him remain.
Source: Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1840
This matter is so important that the righteous predecessors included it in their treatises on sound creed and Islamic theology, such as what was written by Imam al-Tahawi:
وَلَا نَرَى الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى أَئِمَّتِنَا وَوُلَاةِ أُمُورِنَا وَإِنْ جَارُوا وَلَا نَدْعُو عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا نَنْزِعُ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَتِهِمْ وَنَرَى طَاعَتَهُمْ مِنْ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَرِيضَةً مَا لَمْ يَأْمُرُوا بِمَعْصِيَةٍ وَنَدْعُو لَهُمْ بِالصَّلَاحِ وَالْمُعَافَاةِ
We do not rebel against our leaders or those in charge of our affairs, even if they are tyrannical. We do not supplicate against them, nor withdraw from obedience to them. We view obedience to them as obedience to Allah Almighty, an obligation, as long as they do not order disobedience to Allah. We supplicate on their behalf for righteousness and wellness.
Source: al-ʻAqīdah al-Ṭaḥāwīyah 1/68
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
@@spawnnpwn4166 Firstly, which ruler have you or I given Bay'ah to? I dont recall giving Bay'ah to any nation-state.
Or shall I give bay'ah to all of them? Which is not permissible you cant give bay'ah to multiple "rulers".
Secondly, all of these nation states themselves dont care about being a ruler to the ummah they give allegiances to either NATO or Russia/China. Their policies are in accordance with what the kuffar dictate.
So everything you've quoted here doesn't apply to modern times, we dont have a Muslim ruler/Khilafah that governs the affairs of the ummah.
@@spawnnpwn4166
Assalamu Aleikum brother.
Can you tell me about where you got reference for imam Ashari?
I respect this sheikh a lot but I don't know how public criticism of the ruler will lead to bloodshed. We see in western media, criticism of western governments has not lead to bloodshed so why should we assume that it will in Muslim countries?
Thats saudi puppet ideology. They arent salafi they are wahhabi the saudi political ideology
True. This is a topic of various point of views and different applications for different conditions.
Regarding your question two recent examples happened for two different reasons. Bangladesh Islamic ruler got ousted for many a reasons bloodshed happened and the people won due to a corrupt ruler bringing the country into disrepute. Syria for over 40 years the Islamic rulers silencing all minorities locking them and eliminating them without any disregard and spent millions on various luxury cars have stolen millions of Syrian money, chemically killed thousands of people and was supported by the disbelieving west. Recently past few years top Sheikhs been making dua for Palestine and being pro Palestine have been taken and locked up by the modern Saudi Arabia why because the lslamic leaders son wants to make it tourist friendly rather a place of of monotheism. All of this is covered as minor signs leading to the major signs for the end of days.
Asalamualaikum The Grand Mosque seizure, also known as the siege of Calamity, was a siege that took place between 20 November and 4 December 1979 at the Grand Mosque of Mecca, the holiest Islamic site in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. The building was besieged by up to 600 militants under the leadership of Juhayman al-Otaybi, a Saudi anti-monarchy Islamist from the Otaibah tribe.
The claim that saudi arabia arrested people for making dua for Palestine is an utter lie.
There are recent videos from less than a year ago of sheikh sudais and other regular people making dua for Palestine.
Also a Palestinian who's family was killed came to hajj recently.
As for the corrupt syrian regime they are kuffar. They are Nusayri alawites who's kufr are worse than the christians and Jews.
The only reason rebellion was warned against was to prevent greater harm since obviously the leader had alot of power.
This revolution only lead to other corrupt regimes gaining power.
@@A_Nas78
Also publicly speaking against leaders isn't revolting but it is something that can lead to revolution.
Like the case of Uthmaan رضي الله عنه. People spoke out against him exposing his weaknesses which ended up getting him killed.
It's not "government scholars" or "madkhalis" or whatever you call them who say to obey the rulers
It was Muhammad ﷺ who said this.
Umm Salamah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
سَتَكُونُ أُمَرَاءُ فَتَعْرِفُونَ وَتُنْكِرُونَ فَمَنْ عَرَفَ بَرِئَ وَمَنْ أَنْكَرَ سَلِمَ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ رَضِيَ وَتَابَعَ
There will be rulers from whom you will see both goodness and corruption. One who recognizes their evil and hates it will maintain his innocence, but one who is pleased with it and follows them will be sinful.
It was said, “Shall we not fight them?” The Prophet said:
لَا مَا صَلَّوْا
No, as long as they pray.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1854, Grade: Sahih
What if the rulers are committing kufr and were put in power by colonial powers?
Still not allowed to rebel against him if he is a Muslim (ahlussunnah)
how is he a muslim if he commits kufr?
@@valton12
There is major or minor kuffer.
Alot of carijis will accuse ruIers of major kuffer faIsely.
They will quote Quran 5.44 often & Ieave verse 47 which also gives context.
@@valton12
There is major & minor kuffer.
@@infj5196madkhali in full force in the comments.
Sheikh is absolutely right. I should help my ummah by correcting my aqeedah. All the bloodshed of our brothers and sisters will stop.
😂😂😂😂
Lol
Fear Allah
For one. Following the correct Islamic procedure in advising the Muslim rulers (instead of recklessly parading insults) will unify the Ummah to at least a little degree, InshaAllah. If we do what you call towards, we will have more countries like Libya and Iraq. Division amongst ourselves helps the Zionists more than what you hope to achieve by insulting our rulers will ever do.
@@dynodie The problem is when you try to take the situation of Imam Ahmad and apply it to today. This is illogical and impractical, don't disrespect the fiqh of Islam which the great scholars have explained and given to us!
There's no khilafah today, tell me which ruler have you or I given bay'ah to? That's why if you look at the books of fiqh that explain how we conduct ourselves with rulers it's saying we have given our bay'ah to them, bay'ah has been given, etc...
What we have today is not Islamic rulership (khilafah), it's Nation-States who themselves have given THEIR OWN Bay'ah to the likes of the United States, (NATO) or to Russia/China... This is not bay'ah
To claim we have "Muslim rulers" today is like you're taking cow dung and smearing it all over the books of fiqh! May Allah guide us and save us from such kufr
I accept this way if the ruler rules with the law of Allah Azza wa jal.
You should also act within the laws of Allah (Azza Wa Jal)
@dynodie ofcourse we all try, but when it comes to general legislation being ruled over the land, it must be the law of Allah. If not, then he has rejected The quran.
If the law is judging between the people and you follow your desire or to cause thulim ( transgression ), then this is kufr duna kufr. When does it become kufr.
It's when you take a ruling and replace it with another. example, the zaani ( adulterer ) is punished with 100 lashes, but then the ruler has a different legislation where it ruled that they serve 2 decades in prison. This is tabdeel, which leads one out of thebfold of islam. Wallahu Alam
@@banu_diini You cannot make kufr of anyone in Islam without following the proper Islamic procedure (otherwise, according to you, all countries are somehow kafir). This is the way of the Khawarij.
th-cam.com/video/FlRZ3kna0kU/w-d-xo.html
@@banu_diini Be careful.
@@banu_diini madkhalis have no direct respone brother, they only beat around the bush
There were many times during the Khulafah ar Rashid and the times of the Ummayad and Abbadsid where if people felt they had been wronged would publicly call on the rulers for justice. The only reason some people shy away from the criticism of rulers is because the institutions they graduated from are funded by those said rulers. Muhammed bin Sultan has openly pursued a policy of deislamasing Saudi Arabian society but you will never hear a single word of criticism from them. God in Surah Tawbah says the Christians and jews have taken their priest's and rabbis as their God. Why did He say that? Its not because they worship them but they make halal what is haram and vice versa. In UAE they made zina halal which of them spoke out against it ? It was the Sunnah of every messenger to take the cause of the weak and oppressed none of them were ever on the side of tyrants and oppressers
Sins in Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦
Shaykh Sulaymān Ar-Ruḥaylī حفظه الله:
The more Tawḥīd, Sunnah and obedience there is in a country, the more that country is loved. In KSA, Tawḥīd is apparent and the Sunnah is apparent, so it's loved more.
Yes, there are sins, but the intelligent one looks at the overall good that is present. Tawḥīd is manifest; there are no graves being worshipped and no one besides Allāh is being called upon. Also, the Sunnah is manifest - banners of innovation are not being raised. In addition, there are many other forms of goodness that are apparent.
This doesn't mean that we be pleased with sins and we let them increase. No, rather we strive, and the least we can do is to supplicate for the well-being of the rulers and the country and that Allāh distances them from sins.
If a person is able to advise the ruler in a befitting manner, in a way that maintains his prestige and in private, then it's obligatory upon him to do so. And the one who is able to pass on the message to the scholars in a respectable manner, then that is what is obligatory upon him.
As for using sins that are happening in a country to destroy the country, then this is a corrupt way. Attacking the rulers and the country due to sins, making and spreading clips and speaking against them from pulpits, is a corrupt method and will not lead to rectification.
A Muslim hates all sins in all countries, and the presence of sins pains his heart. However, the righteous one seeking rectification employs legislated means to bring about change. He doesn't become happy when he sees sins and starts spreading them as if though it's ʿEid - "O look, such-and-such concert is happening". This is not rectification.
This is why the methodology of the Salaf is one which is sound and brings about rectification. The methodology of the Salaf is one which is just and balanced and it adheres to correct legislated principles.
Well said brother
@@infj5196 May Allah preserve the Shaykh and you. Ameen.
Assallamoalkum when they make image of kaba and dance round it with naked women,your telling me i have to keep quiet
@mohammadnaeemalam4159 walaykumusalaam. Wasn't that proven to be false AI trick?
What is the advice given to us by Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam in regards to dealing with rulers?
@@ExtremeShez rulers, like the Khalifa, and those he appoints, that rule with Sharia. Remember, as long as they rule by the book of Allah SWT. Madkhali klb
Basically all these Sunni kings and leaders aligning and supporting zionest funding Israel love this ruling
R u a literate human?
Who is funding Israel? Why do you have more hate for Muslim rulers than the actual Zionists that fund Israel militarily and monetarily? Do you know what Israel likes more than what you have mentioned above? A divided, weak, and fractured Ummah.
Why do you show more hate towards the Muslim rulers than the actual enemies of Islam amongst the world nations (who are the ones funding and granting Israel military support)?
You know what Israel loves more? That the Muslims remain divided and further cripple themselves by turning against the Rulers. What do you think Israel prefers, fake diplomatic smiles, or for more of our nations to end up like Libya and Iraq?
We are brothers. We should be making dua for our Muslim rulers, and not act against them. They are a test for us, so let us succeed, inshaAllah.
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
@@bushrashaikh2783are u blind devotee of saud. Why did the sauds forgot this ruling while ottomans were ruling them?
Funny how all these puppet speakers give uzr to the murtad taghut rulers but start barkin quickly against mujhdin calling them agents of yahud/extreme etc
Al-Imām Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari (may Allah’s mercy be upon him, died 324H) stated: “Ijmā’ number 45: Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah have agreed upon hearing and obeying the rulers of the Muslims. And whoever gains authority over the people [in a country] whether with their pleasure or by overpowering, then obedience is given to them, whether they are righteous or sinful. It is not allowed to revolt against them regardless if they are tyrannical or just.” (Risālah ilā Ahlith-Thaghar, p. 168)
@@spawnnpwn4166yes the key word is a “muslim” leader who rules by the book of allah not manmade legislations. Please read something before you send it. There are no “muslim” leaders today
Exactly. Let the Mujahideen conquer and rule a land, then these very people will be at the forefront calling them Khawaarij, kaafir, agents of Israel, etc. Then there's no holding your tongue and advising the Muslim ruler in private.
@spawnnpwn4166 The people you are addressing do not hold the advise of scholars as guidance. They are driven by desires which are driven by the shayateen.
May Allah guide us and them
@@RifleJockey365 Ameen, I just want them to read the evidence. If they reject it, their own tongues will testify against them on Yawm al Qiyamah.
There are rules and regulation in accounting the ruler. But a ruler that implements islam. What is the ruling for the ones that dont as is the case for all of them today.
Bloodshed in the ummah im sorry but there has been blood shed anyway. 100 years without islam and we have 22 million Muslims dead estimates.
Just saying people sitting in there rooms and cursing rulers is a mockery to the scholars who are actually putting their lives at risk for the deen.
Its like me saying all the bible bashing lot wanna do is make secular converts while the lands of islam has no islam.
This guy should stick to comparative religion debates as he clearly doesnt know politics.
The issue is not straight forward. Yazeed vs Hussain RA shows that it is permissible to revolt against rulers even if he is a muslim.
No its not. Sahabah can make mistake.
Only the 4 khalifs (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali) are rightly guided after prophets death
@@infj5196 yes, but the problem is MANY Sahaba participated in the revolt against Yazeed. Yazeed was clearly appointed as the Ameer by his father Muawiya RA. I repeat.. MANY sahaba participated in the revolt.
@@TablighiJamaat-sh6wc Thats irrelevant. Whether there are many sahabahs or not, the Prophet s.a.w clearly forbid rebelling against Muslim rulers.
@@infj5196 It is relevant because we need to be consistence with other Usool of Fiqh which takes into consideration the Ijma of the Sahaba.
We need to understand the Hadith like how the majority of the Sahaba understood it
@@TablighiJamaat-sh6wc Theres no ijma of sahabah that we can rebel against Muslim rulers.
The CLEAR evidence from sahih hadiths prove that its HARAM to rebel against Muslim rulers
Sheik uthman praised the recent Syrian revolution
Assad is a disbeliever and a tyrant.
Hes not a Muslim
@@infj5196
Asod is a shia pagan, agreed.
Never heard you say anything to the saudis
Madkhali murji’a
Shiekh is 100% right. A lot of you won’t comprehend it and probably never will due to your ignorance.
If the leaders cant handle criticism they should really consider a new job role ! o wait they cant becuase its a Monarch ! and it isnt a democracy .. One rule with no change !
Democracy is NOT from Islam.
This sheikh knows all the rules and regulations
Q
Madkhali detected
@@Ibi16
Cariji detected, who are murji with disbelievers.
@@Ibi16
More Iike Cariji detected ...
@@Ibi16
MadkaIi's a cariji term though.
Cariji😂😂😂😂
I am not a car
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543madkhali klb
How can an ordinary person advise a muslim leader? Genuine question .. also its not just about kufr.. people have concerns with what muslim leaders do, like some allowing hindu temples in muslim lands etc, so is an ordinary person not allowed to comment on what these leaders are doing? Like if I said, “its very disappointing that Saudi leaders are secularizing the country” is that sinful to say that???
The ulama have the means to advise the Muslim rulers in private.
Ordinary citizens dont have to interfere
@@infj5196okay madkhali.
@@infj5196 ulama who are paid by the tawagheet?
Assallamoalykum all Muslims have the right to criticise and talk about bad leaders
No. We have to respect our Muslim rulers.
Thats the consensus of ahlussunnah
@@infj5196okay madkhali. Go into every comment to defend tawagheet
Islam has given us freedom of speech
th-cam.com/video/wQS0PPIjscU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=1bE0z0i4KgpuBZf0
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159 these people don’t care. They only care about ‘obey the ruler’. They believe their rulers are above the Sharia
Abu Musab spoke ill of the ruler of Gaza, Faris Hamadi spoke ill of the new ruler of Syria, they need to repent
Hms is not the official ruler of Gaza
@@nazmulslater8398
Do you have a video of Faris speaking of Jolani?
Or is it a random person who we don't know if he even has a Iink to Jolani?
@@infj5196 mbs is not the ruler of Saudi so if people criticise him they aren't committing sins.
I'm not going to go as low as u sectarian Salafies lying in order to defend rulers who don't care about Islam and Muslims.
So you lie and speak ill of rulers
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 he posted Thier photo and called them khawarij
@@nazmulslater8398
Where?
Assallamoalykum follower of Abdul wahab killed many Muslims,then the British zaionest joined Saudi Arabia to get rid of the Khalfat
th-cam.com/video/wQS0PPIjscU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=1bE0z0i4KgpuBZf0
th-cam.com/video/wQS0PPIjscU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=1bE0z0i4KgpuBZf0
Your telling me to be quiet
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159
I am telling you to Iearn Quran 13.11.
In an interview a Saudi said we allow entertainment because ppl Ieave, so they should stay and support Saudi for Islam, not entertainment.
@@mohammadnaeemalam4159
View Quran 13.11.
Ppl shouldn't want to see that and halal aIt. Should be buiIt. Dawah is needed.