If the F-16 lands in a field, then it cannot be serviced without a ramp, it cannot be serviced. If he lands in the field, this is already an aviation incident.
"We need something to get in the cockpit." - "Like ... a ladder?" - "No no, we want something different this time." - "..." - "How many options of ladder can you come up with?" - "Buckle up, DOD" 😉😂
These planes are made by completely different manufacturer, designed decades apart. A-10 - Fairchild Aircraft F-15 - Boeing F-35 - Lockheed Martin AV-8B - McDonnell Douglas
Despite having built in ladders, From which of these showcased aircrafts, can a pilot unpack and get down without any sort of intervention from ground crew?
F-15 is the most laconic. A-10 is brutal as his cannon. AV-8 isn't ladder, but the attraction "plop down , getting out". And yes, right-hand driving wheel forever (ladder is on the right side of the plane).
Yes. On the A10c there is a red round cap to the right that can be lifted and a button to extrend the ladder. But, to retract it, it requires ground crew. I'm not sure about the other aircraft.
Using the internal ladder, the back seater climbs up and on to the intake, careful not to step on the edge of it. Normal ops are just to use a ladder that hooks on to the cockpit, then step over on to the intake.
That's so cool, but why not just make a ladder with wheel in airport, common use to all kinds of airplane. Airplane can lose some weight, and cost will also less~just a thought
Fighter aircraft need to be able to be deployed as quickly as possible, and may have to land in places that are not necessarily suitable for receiving them, or on the deck of an aircraft carrier where mobile ladders dragging and that could be blown all over the deck would not be the most suitable. They must therefore be at least somewhat autonomous, and have backup, which is why most of them also have an auxiliary power unit, to speed up start-up and not depend on equipment on the ground that may be absent.
You wouldn't want to rely on another outside piece of equipment to be able to get in (and out) of your plane. When jets need to be scrambled EVERY second counts and having to wheel over a ladder takes time as they can't have one lying out everywhere. Simple solution is to have the ability to mount the jet built into the jet.
From a new aerospace engineer, your line of thinking is absolutely correct. However I think the reason aligns with what the other individual stated: in the trade off between scramble time / getting in the air quickly, this solution was a good choice.
Yes, it's pretty typical. The fan blades aren't rigidly attached to the hub. Centrifugal force pulls and locks them into position once the RPM's are high enough. Sometimes when a jet is just sitting on the ground and the fan is wind milling in a breeze you can hear them going "tic-tic-tic."
11:24 I don't know about you guys, but I would be very nervous flying a single engine airplane, whose engine make those scratchy noises after it is shutdown.
That's every jet engine. And what that is, is the compressor blades flexing and rattling after they have cooled down and loosen. They are intentionally loose like that so when they get hot and expand they are secure.
I'm surprised that ladders are built into all these fighters because ladders add weight and take up precious space and are another thing that can possibly go wrong. Wouldn't it be simpler to do away with built-in ladders and have a mobile ladder quickly moved next to the fighter when the pilot needs to get in or get out of the plane? I'm especially concerned about the built-in ladder with the F-35 because a built-in ladder means needing to make a little compartment that stores the ladder, and that compartment would have to be often opened and closed with the possibility of developing small problems with its fit that might cause it to develop a significant radar return.
As a person that has worked on a flight line before; the less that is carried out to the plane before take off, is less that has to be tracked before the plane can leave. Besides, if the plane lands somewhere they do not have a ladder for it, then the pilot would be stuck until one could be found.
Why is this built-in ladder needed? It is a waste of time, money (costs like a light car), effort, inconvenient and increases RCS. You can't service the plane with it. There is a normal ramp at any airfield. This is called "woe from wit" (a ballpoint pen, what could you write in zero gravity? There is an ordinary pencil)
Racism supporting comment censorship channel be like: Incredible examples I quite enjoy the Harrier style So Efficient Could be super Uncomfortable for the two seat variant though
As always, the Americans have made a wrong design for the right needs, and it is really hard to imagine that the Americans would open such a big hole in the outer layer of the aircraft just for the convenience of the pilot to get on and off the plane, and not be afraid of affecting stealth and maintenance? And the foolish thing is that when the pilot gets on the plane and can't handle the ladder, do you think the same way? I won't talk about my better design ideas, I'll say the simplest, why not design the ladder into the cockpit, just find a very small position, it's really not okay for you to make a manual foldable ladder, the design of the good point also solves the problem, at least it will not be clearly designed the ladder, but also additional personnel to do such a boring thing, and then actually take it out to show their so-called humanity
If you are forced to land without a ground crew you probably don't want to get out of the plane and if you do need to get out after an emergency landing a graceful exit is the least of your problems.
@@jameslooker4791 When you are in Emergency situation as out of fuel, you need to land any airport and fill the fuel and take off again by yourself like zombie apocalypse. Don't you think about that?
@@ckymzhSo how are you taking off again from a random airport with no fuel in a zombie apocalypse? Whoever you borrow fuel from should be able to help you get into the plane. And the ladder can be deployed by the pilot, just not retracted.
L evoluzione dell f 16 Eagle è il f35 il casco del pilota tipo Mangusta ma ancora più evoluto coordina marina fanteria panzer tank elicotteri cavalleria aria caccia awachs B21 b2Stelt e U2 tutto un casino metterlo in pratica ma se ci riesci non c è x nessuno gioco partita incontro slam Maximus
Probably the most useless part of these planes. If assistance is required for boarding, then a stepladder or anything like external steps would suffice. Maybe the worst solution I see is the F/A-18 Hornet. The stowage is under the wing. Imagine what could happen during a fight and those stairs flip out and the aerodynamics go to ... beep ... Only AV-8B Harrier II had a practical solution. If a pilot in some hypothetical situation needs to get in unassisted. He can gradually click the steps behind him and when the cockpit is closed, the step on the bar is retracted. Even if he doesn't click the steps in, then they are not so huge that they would interfere too much with aerodynamics, and in my opinion could be flown with no problem... And if he wants to get off (and not jump off), the steps can be gradually retracted. Someone just used their brain in the design that. 🤌
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
F-16には内蔵の梯子がついていないので支援機材のない基地に着陸した場合は乗り降りが結構大変なんだとか
因みにF-16を元にしたF-2にはコクピット内に縄ばしごが収納されているそうです
If the F-16 lands in a field, then it cannot be serviced without a ramp, it cannot be serviced. If he lands in the field, this is already an aviation incident.
機種ごとにそのコンセプトに合った梯子の格納方法と厳つさがあるなぁ
(ホーネットが主翼側に折りたたむ方式だとはびっくり)
This is fascinating! I never knew that the A-10 had such a unique boarding system! 💪✈
- Board!
The pilot shouted and climbed into the plane
0:46
やっぱりA-10っぽいパイロットが来た、この安心感よw
"We need something to get in the cockpit." - "Like ... a ladder?" - "No no, we want something different this time." - "..." - "How many options of ladder can you come up with?" - "Buckle up, DOD" 😉😂
Ok.
You tried to be funny. I give you that.
These planes are made by completely different manufacturer, designed decades apart.
A-10 - Fairchild Aircraft
F-15 - Boeing
F-35 - Lockheed Martin
AV-8B - McDonnell Douglas
@@jeffsaffron5647 I'm aware. Nevertheless it's funny the solutions are so different.
Despite having built in ladders, From which of these showcased aircrafts, can a pilot unpack and get down without any sort of intervention from ground crew?
Just pull the ejection lever
I could never be an A10 pilot - my fear of heights would kick in halfway up that ladder
ギネス級のチキンですね。
今後も命を大事に！
🤣🤣🤣 I see what you did there.
F-35ははしご入れる所がステルスデザインでいいな
空母の上はスペースが限られてて外付け梯子を置きたくないので、艦載機は内蔵式ラダーを持つって聞いてたけど、意外と空軍機も内蔵式あるんだ
F15の内蔵式ラダーとか初めて見た…
上のほうのステップ？って常に押すだけであんな感じに露出するのかな？それとも下の梯子を伸ばしたときだけ出せる仕様？
そしてハリアーの下からﾆｭって伸びてくるステップは電動式かと思いきや、シンプルにキャノピーの動きと物理的に繋がってて連動してるだけなんだ とても合理的
You can see how the F-14 Tomcat boarding ladder works in "Top Gun: Maverick" when they steal the Tomcat.
F15の外装が凹んで足場になる仕組み面白いな
あとF18はストレーキの部分が足場も兼ねてるから乗り降りしやすそう
I never knew I needed this video. Thank you.
F/A-18のが一番造りがしっかりしてそう 見てて安心感ある
F-15のとか華奢ですぐ足踏み外しそう
A-10よ、君はラダーまで魅力的なのか！
あんなにきれいに収まるもんなんだな
ハリアーだけが右側から乗り降りするのは開発国が右ハンドルのイギリスだからなのかな
F-15は外付け梯子しか見た事なかったから内蔵されてるの初めて知った。
Safe, sensible and light. Impressive
...That was awesome.
梯子を収納してくれる人が必要だから一人じゃ戦闘機には乗れないね整備済みの機体でも
海軍→空母甲板でハシゴを用意するのは邪魔だから
F15→採用国が少く専用のハシゴがないから
A10→不整地運用を考慮して
F35→設計が共通だから
それぞれ違って面白い
戦闘機の設計者は、ハシゴの設計ができて初めて一人前になれる。たぶん！
F-15 is the most laconic.
A-10 is brutal as his cannon.
AV-8 isn't ladder, but the attraction "plop down , getting out". And yes, right-hand driving wheel forever (ladder is on the right side of the plane).
短足&身体固いワイ、イーグルを断念。
それはそうとアメ車と英車(車？)で搭乗方向が左右違うの興味深いですね
ハシゴのステップ幅はさすが米軍w
数少ないw
操縦士の体型に大体はわわせるんだろうけど...
だいぶ幅が開いて、アメリカサイズ♪
新しい機体の場合、一人で降りるときは中から操作で出せるんですか？
Yes. On the A10c there is a red round cap to the right that can be lifted and a button to extrend the ladder. But, to retract it, it requires ground crew. I'm not sure about the other aircraft.
やっぱり陸上と空母は大分違いますね海軍機はラダーの構造がしっかりしている
Nice design
Type of F4 laddar, It was the classic
F15の一番上のステップの蓋はブラブラのままなんすね。飛ぶときバタバタしたり・・・・しないんだろうな
アメリカ人って体格がいいからどのくらいの体重まで耐えられる設計なんやろか。
Nice vdo
Av8 ladder is so small
it hard to believe F15 and av8b ladder won't pop out mid-flight. it just a single push
F18 has to be my favorite
収納機構が有るのは海軍機だけだと思っていました…
イーグルのオールインワンタイプが、洗練されている感じがして好きでした！
The harrier looks like the most difficult to enter the cockpit
梯子の収納方式にも驚くけど、前脚のカバーに記載されている名前と街の名前は整備チーフ名と出身地なのかな？
السلام عليكم ورحمه الله وبركاته أستاذ فاضل محترم جدا جدا ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😮😮❤❤❤❤❤❤
F-16 jealous of everyone’s ladder 😢
Two things: I did not know the F-15 was a two-seater second, I guess we will not see Lizzo flying a fighter any time soon.
전투기들에 저런 것이 내장되어 있다는 것이 놀랍네
F-16, F-2, F-22: Why we dont have 😠😠😠
You forgot to include the FireFox ladder...
사다리차로 타고 내리는줄 알았는데 내장형 이라니 첨 알았다
Wish to see how the man on the backseat of the F15 is getting in and out. Looks pretty tight.And at 7:56 what does that signal mean?
might be a squadron-specific gesture, i couldnt find anything about it besides it might be connected to when they taxi
Using the internal ladder, the back seater climbs up and on to the intake, careful not to step on the edge of it. Normal ops are just to use a ladder that hooks on to the cockpit, then step over on to the intake.
Is very interesting how to get inside.
c152 should have on of these to prevent falling off the strup step
That's so cool, but why not just make a ladder with wheel in airport, common use to all kinds of airplane. Airplane can lose some weight, and cost will also less~just a thought
Fighter aircraft need to be able to be deployed as quickly as possible, and may have to land in places that are not necessarily suitable for receiving them, or on the deck of an aircraft carrier where mobile ladders dragging and that could be blown all over the deck would not be the most suitable. They must therefore be at least somewhat autonomous, and have backup, which is why most of them also have an auxiliary power unit, to speed up start-up and not depend on equipment on the ground that may be absent.
You wouldn't want to rely on another outside piece of equipment to be able to get in (and out) of your plane. When jets need to be scrambled EVERY second counts and having to wheel over a ladder takes time as they can't have one lying out everywhere. Simple solution is to have the ability to mount the jet built into the jet.
From a new aerospace engineer, your line of thinking is absolutely correct. However I think the reason aligns with what the other individual stated: in the trade off between scramble time / getting in the air quickly, this solution was a good choice.
🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤🎉 THANKS
戦闘機って地上要員いないと一人じゃ乗り降りできないってことかぁ MSFSで観光地巡りごっことかしてるけど本当は地上要員にアシストしてもらわないとできないんだな
F35の格納ラダーはカバーを工具を使って開けなあかんのがめんどくさいな。
カバーを開けると今度はピンだらけだし。
これ逆に降りる時は外からじゃないとハシゴ出せないの？
イーグルが一番危ない印象を持った
"Dadbod" Boer hahaha. Marines get away with cooler callsigns than the Air force does. :)
😬...GR8 opportunities for human FOD insertion. Auxiliary intakes must really work good in reducing inlet volume of the primaries!
إنها الحرب ريتشارد قلب الاسد ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
如果沒有地勤老哥幫忙把梯子頂回去，怎麽起飛呢。
所以不要惹火你的地勤
I kinda wondering how do you operate ladder from the inside
You don't.
many upgraded ladder style
The British: building the first vtol fighter jet? 🧠. Creating a descent ladder for said jet? 🦧
К пустой голове руку не прикладывают!!!
1:59 Так нас учили в Советской армии....
多少钱一个？
F-16？？
A10とF３５を比べるときっと価格差凄いよね～と思うオラは技術屋ｗｗ
since the ladder is not automatic, still need a ground crew to operate,
so why not use just a normal ladder carrying by the ground crew
... and thus saving weight, space and components
Not much discreet in design for the back seat of F-15 (D/E/EX). The canopy should open higher to be easier to access.
11:23 that noise is normal?????
Yes, it's pretty typical. The fan blades aren't rigidly attached to the hub. Centrifugal force pulls and locks them into position once the RPM's are high enough. Sometimes when a jet is just sitting on the ground and the fan is wind milling in a breeze you can hear them going "tic-tic-tic."
11:24 I don't know about you guys, but I would be very nervous flying a single engine airplane, whose engine make those scratchy noises after it is shutdown.
That's every jet engine. And what that is, is the compressor blades flexing and rattling after they have cooled down and loosen. They are intentionally loose like that so when they get hot and expand they are secure.
Why? When you shut it down, it's because you don't need it.
It's gotta suck if those ladders mess up 😐
I'm surprised that ladders are built into all these fighters because ladders add weight and take up precious space and are another thing that can possibly go wrong. Wouldn't it be simpler to do away with built-in ladders and have a mobile ladder quickly moved next to the fighter when the pilot needs to get in or get out of the plane? I'm especially concerned about the built-in ladder with the F-35 because a built-in ladder means needing to make a little compartment that stores the ladder, and that compartment would have to be often opened and closed with the possibility of developing small problems with its fit that might cause it to develop a significant radar return.
As a person that has worked on a flight line before; the less that is carried out to the plane before take off, is less that has to be tracked before the plane can leave. Besides, if the plane lands somewhere they do not have a ladder for it, then the pilot would be stuck until one could be found.
Nunca armó un model kit el creador de contenido!..
👍👍👍
Ace Combat!!😅
Why is this built-in ladder needed? It is a waste of time, money (costs like a light car), effort, inconvenient and increases RCS. You can't service the plane with it. There is a normal ramp at any airfield. This is called "woe from wit" (a ballpoint pen, what could you write in zero gravity? There is an ordinary pencil)
Why do the Navy and Marine maintainers wear head protection and the Air Force maintainers not?
why is the comment section of japanese comments
Because video title is displayed in Japanese for Japanese viewers.
F35 저 공간은 우주 통털어..가장 비싼 사다리 수납장.. 집어넣고 빼는 저 병사 평생 월급보다 비쌈...
Wow, never realised that you have to be a bit of a gymnast to get into some of these. A missed foot hold and you're falling quite a way down 😮
You must be in VERY good shape to be a fighter pilot in the first place. This is the least difficult physical exercise related to the job.
It’s a very basic feature but quite Incredibly Invaluable
Bonjour
Une question
Comment fait le pilote pour descendre de l avion tout seul lol il saute😂
Racism supporting comment censorship channel be like:
Incredible examples
I quite enjoy the Harrier style
So Efficient
Could be super Uncomfortable for the two seat variant though
As always, the Americans have made a wrong design for the right needs, and it is really hard to imagine that the Americans would open such a big hole in the outer layer of the aircraft just for the convenience of the pilot to get on and off the plane, and not be afraid of affecting stealth and maintenance? And the foolish thing is that when the pilot gets on the plane and can't handle the ladder, do you think the same way? I won't talk about my better design ideas, I'll say the simplest, why not design the ladder into the cockpit, just find a very small position, it's really not okay for you to make a manual foldable ladder, the design of the good point also solves the problem, at least it will not be clearly designed the ladder, but also additional personnel to do such a boring thing, and then actually take it out to show their so-called humanity
A-10はやっぱり頑丈そうに見えるしイーグルはスマートだ
ホーネットは面白いけどハリアーは色々と不安だ・・・
02:13
К нашим дровам, надо со своей лестницей, приходить. 🤣🤣🤣
Bit like a climbing rope really
Except AV-8B Harrier II, non of them can take off pilot alone.
What a stupid system it is!
If you are forced to land without a ground crew you probably don't want to get out of the plane and if you do need to get out after an emergency landing a graceful exit is the least of your problems.
@@jameslooker4791 When you are in Emergency situation as out of fuel, you need to land any airport and fill the fuel and take off again by yourself like zombie apocalypse. Don't you think about that?
@@ckymzhYou're stupid. They have planes refueling in the air.
@@ckymzhSo how are you taking off again from a random airport with no fuel in a zombie apocalypse? Whoever you borrow fuel from should be able to help you get into the plane. And the ladder can be deployed by the pilot, just not retracted.
@@jameslooker4791 That is why it's called zombie apocalypse, you have to do everything by yourself.
これこれ、これ知りたかったんだよ
でも、搭乗した後のハシゴの格納はコックピットからじゃ操作できないのか？
映画とかで戦闘機略奪して逃げ去るシーンあるけど、無理じゃんな
L evoluzione dell f 16 Eagle è il f35 il casco del pilota tipo Mangusta ma ancora più evoluto coordina marina fanteria panzer tank elicotteri cavalleria aria caccia awachs B21 b2Stelt e U2 tutto un casino metterlo in pratica ma se ci riesci non c è x nessuno gioco partita incontro slam Maximus
右側にも付いてるんだろうな。
Can Joe Biden climb any of these ladders?
Probably not, but Trump definitely can't. He already had trouble getting into a garbage truck.
@@bartsimpson2504😂😂😂
Trump went into the front of the garbage truck instead of the back.
No climbing up, but jumping down
Maybe if theres ice cream in the cockpit
🌹🥀🌾🪻💐
驚乜野?，
자체적으로 시동걸지 못해서 외부에서 발전기로 시동 걸어야 하는거 다 아는데
대공망 없는 만만한 레바논이나 폭격하는 무능 전투기
실전에 투입도 못하는 전투기가 뭔 쎈척하고 쳐 있네.
자갈에 겁먹고 벌벌떠는게 F-16인거 다 아는데
미국이 아직도 공군대국인줄 아는 초딩은 뭘까?
Truth be told none of those pilots should’ve flying the Failure-35
Sorry but the DEI lady has no business flying an f35 or any fighter aircraft. Lol.
Overtly stereotypically Racist and Sexist be like:
Bruh
That's an unfair assessment to make if you don't know who she is.
Jealous that she is better at probably everything than you? Certainly shows that she has a higher IQ.
@@KC_SmoothIt, not She because the DEI.
So women only belong in the kitchen at home?
もし米軍のパイロットになれるならば
輸送機や空中給油機のパイロットになりたい
まったりしてそうだし、民間に転職できそうだし
知らんけど
ハリアーのエンジン、ガラガラ言ってるけど大丈夫なのかな？
そして接地した瞬間の音と、同時にスラスタが後ろ向くのいいですね。
Probably the most useless part of these planes. If assistance is required for boarding, then a stepladder or anything like external steps would suffice.
Maybe the worst solution I see is the F/A-18 Hornet. The stowage is under the wing. Imagine what could happen during a fight and those stairs flip out and the aerodynamics go to ... beep ...
Only AV-8B Harrier II had a practical solution. If a pilot in some hypothetical situation needs to get in unassisted. He can gradually click the steps behind him and when the cockpit is closed, the step on the bar is retracted. Even if he doesn't click the steps in, then they are not so huge that they would interfere too much with aerodynamics, and in my opinion could be flown with no problem... And if he wants to get off (and not jump off), the steps can be gradually retracted. Someone just used their brain in the design that. 🤌
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤