1. 5:24 the interesting approach David Hockney does with photography 2. 0:57 what Hockney says about "seeing" 3. 7:00 The 5 hands 4. 18:45 Grand Canyon
Great reflections and interesting images as always - “drawing with a camera” really fun idea and the curiosity of playing with movement and perspective is really fun and making looking into something totally dynamic
I generally agree with you, especially your appraisal of landscape photographers. But with Hockney whilst I really enjoy looking at his paintings, I can’t help feeling confused by his photographs. Yes it’s clever the way the prints are arranged, but that’s about it. A single image or better still a painting would have worked just as well in most of these works. Visual communication is simple, and direct with the photographers you admire, Hockey’s work is anything but simple. The real master of this type of multiple imagery was Picasso.
Pedestrian would be a better epithet... this was already an established critique,John Hilliard is much more pertinent.... Painting cannot articulate the geological deeptime of the anthropocene and as for Islamic representational cultures? such as tessellation being a key influence on the renaissance humanism ?
![[Re]curated: David Hockney - The Artist's Eye (1981) | National Gallery](/img/n.gif)
1. 5:24 the interesting approach David Hockney does with photography
2. 0:57 what Hockney says about "seeing"
3. 7:00 The 5 hands
4. 18:45 Grand Canyon
Great reflections and interesting images as always - “drawing with a camera” really fun idea and the curiosity of playing with movement and perspective is really fun and making looking into something totally dynamic
Always interesting and thought provoking listening to Mr H. Thanks.
See David Hockney at Tate Modern on The Art Channel at th-cam.com/video/hUvoG_90XeE/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/JUb22qqG2Vo/w-d-xo.html
I'm soooo glad I found your channel 👏✌
David hockney was and is an art genius
Good stuff. Thanks for the video.
Graham McArthur Thanks Graham.
Excellent, thank you for this!
Very interesting. Thank you.
I generally agree with you, especially your appraisal of landscape photographers. But with Hockney whilst I really enjoy looking at his paintings, I can’t help feeling confused by his photographs. Yes it’s clever the way the prints are arranged, but that’s about it. A single image or better still a painting would have worked just as well in most of these works. Visual communication is simple, and direct with the photographers you admire, Hockey’s work is anything but simple. The real master of this type of multiple imagery was Picasso.
Thank you so much for this. From India.
Interesting stuff, but part of the magic of photography is that it freezes time. It can show you something you can't see.
bruh i have to watch this like 3 times for my art lesson coz teh teacher cant be assed to teach actual art lol
ayy me too
Samw
wow yep
what is the name of the collage with the standing figuere? I need it for an art project :)
Great intro
he is genius
Pedestrian would be a better epithet... this was already an established critique,John Hilliard is much more pertinent.... Painting cannot articulate the geological deeptime of the anthropocene and as for Islamic representational cultures? such as tessellation being a key influence on the renaissance humanism ?