Between 1969 and 1972 twelve men walked on the surface of the moon. It was seen as the first chapter in an ambitious program of space exploration. Year 2020
On landing on the Moon would the engine be heard as it was about to land as we do not hear any noise from any engines on the lamb. Just commentary. Why was that?? Rockets make lots of noise
What was the weight ratio compared to Saturn 5 only being tested without a payload of the lamb and extra fuel to take it out of orbit towards the moon and to have fuel to get off the moon?Like would it be Top heavy and if the Saturn 5 worked so good why did they stop using it? Never understood that how they carried a moon buggy as well surely the Saturn 5 would have be unstable on take off. With all that weight at the top hope someone can answer this then I can understand how they did it. Lot of payload and fuel at the top mmmm. Saturn 5 would get astronauts to the space station instead of using Russians rockets?? Surely ???so is there or was there a Cold War between the USA and Russia when we use their Rockets to get to the space station don’t seem any differences there ?? To me
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT OMG OMG OMG OMG THATS SUCH A W im obsessed with nasa stuff
@@jonnny8 Since there is no atmosphere on the moon, you would not hear any sound there, but inside the lunar lander you should be able to hear it and probably feel it too.
@@jonnny8 First of all, the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon. Using it just to go to the ISS is overkill. Much simpler rockets like the Falcon are much much cheaper. There was quite a lot of testing before landing on the moon: January 27, 1967 Fatal plugs-out test Apollo 1. November 9, 1967 Unmanned test flight Apollo 4. January 22, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 5. April 4, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 6. October 11, 1968 First manned flight Apollo 7. Testing of Command and Service module. December 21, 1968 Apollo 8. First flight Saturn 5, First to the moon, First behind the moon. March 3, 1969 Apollo 9. Practice with the LM around the earth. May 18, 1969 Apollo 10. Practicing with the LM around the moon.
Project Apollo is still the most amazing memory if my teenage years & probably America's greatest achievement. They changed history in a way that will be remembered 500, even 1000 years in the future - people will still remember that Neil & Buzz walking on the moon in 1969.
58:20 I've always said that this is one of the most important photographs in human history, taken at a time of incredible instability on our fragile Earth..
Kubrick’s best efforts can be seen in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The scenes in space and on the moon are immediately recognizable as fake: they’re recorded in 1 G here on Earth. The Apollo videos show perfect 1/6 g gravity instead.
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
I notice that they omitted mentioning that the astronauts read from the book of Genesis on live TV during the Apollo 8 mission. That was the highlight of the mission.
Nobody will ever bother living permanently on that god-forsaken rock. Who in their right mind would want to live on the moon? Old-timers from the 1960s maybe. But Taylor Swift isn't doing gigs on the moon any day soon.
@@0topon A researcher living temporarily for a few months in a research station at the South Pole is not usually classed as “living there” permanently. Antarctica is like Mars. As Elton John told us…..“Mars ain’t the place to raise your kids”.
SpaceX are not amateurs. They just used a different method to develop Starship. For the Saturn V, NASA spent years testing individual stages on huge test stands before committing to a first launch. SpaceX moved to doing launches much earlier in the development cycle. They knew that the hard part was not to get the stages to work, the hard part is developing the heat shield, and that is almost impossible to simulate here on the surface. You need to do test flights for that.
@@Hobbes746 The lack of integrated testing by SpaceX is courting disaster. Iterating through problems that actually happen doesn't solve problems that haven't happened yet. Musk is very impatient and that quality is going to kill a bunch of passengers someday. I hope I'm wrong.
Well, given that NASA just made the decision to have SpaceX perform a rescue mission bc their buddies at Boeing produced a stayliner instead of a star liner...your comment aged real well.
Yah there are allot of special people running around in here, I bet allot of them are bots. The rest are just the crazies with no brain and no life who wish they could be the next famous person but will work their jobs sweeping and mopping the floors.
@@danielecognome7501 And so are our current times. The US is facing its most critical "launch" come 2024 year end. May you vote with your heart and test your decision against what your mind knows.
These are the folks that rot their brains on TikTok all day and haven’t read a book, perhaps ever. The same ones that ask me how to cook ramen noodles when their microwave doesn’t work.
Watched Apollo 11 launch as a schoolboy at Woomera Rocket Range in South Australia. Less than 7 years later I was a shift tech at Orroral Valley tracking station outside Canberra and we supported the multiple ALSEP experiments installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts.
@@lifesahobby The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit. Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead. Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
One of the better telling docs about going to the moon. Lots of nice high quality footage I never saw (or cannot remeber having seen before...). Thanks NASA for painstakingly filming everything!
All the men from Mercury, Gemini and Apollo are some of my greatest heroes. They're the greatest pilots to ever live to alot of people... They certainly are in my book. The Crew of Apollo One will always hold a special place in my heart as well. I'm so grateful for their efforts aswell as all the Astronauts during that time.
@@christopheryoder8292 Thats not what NASA or Elon or anyone is saying. The will is very strong but the tech is not there. imagine? How is THAT possible? China, Russia, India, Europe, Japan, everybody cannot land men on the moon and bring them back safely. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. We never did. The moon is too much of a challenge. Danger beyond imagination. Lets see when they can do it again. They want to build a moonbase to get to Mars? Lets wait and see. Impossible in our lifetime. I will apologise when I am wrong.
~~ From the day JFK made the challenge in 1962 to put men on the moon before the end of the decade - NASA basically had a blank check to make it happen - but they also had the engineering talent ( and the drive & the discipline ) to make it happen - only when they had to make Apollo 17 the final manned mission in 1972 were the economic realities taking hold - the space shuttle was supposed to be the cost-saving alternative - but it never was that. Now it's just all about putting more satellites in orbit - making collisions an ever-increasing danger - and of course space tourism - for rich folks ..
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University. Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back. After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13 Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet. Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts. Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo. Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive. Can we still see the landingsites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).
If you are reading some of the comments here , you will find so many people who lack conviction in their argument about humans not going to the moon . Thats why people argue , they want someone to do the homework for them.. until then they suffer the doubts . This us what happens when you are given choices to study physics , organic chemistry and you say " its too hard " you end up never developing a mind with conceptual capacity .. and you might always pick the easy way from that point on . Its just laziness to doubt and its crazy to argue with them . If you had some guy running across ten lanes of highway, it would be really silly to run across the road with them telling them theyre doing something stupid . So dont argue with them .. youll never change those who never took the ambitious subjects . Youll find behind them all is a lack of physics , science, objectivity , conceptual thought . And that's why they rattle like they do . Here to india .. with the first woman , here to christina cock , heres to the apollo program , vostok, gemini , and all the brave ones who risked it all to inspire us . Gods speed .. 77 tons all the way m may the force be with you and may peace be with those who just dont know .
@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated
@@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated or lack the understanding of physics, science, etc....? Is that why there are scientists, engineers etc.... all over the world who are very educated that agree NASA faked the landings. What do you say to that? Wake up!
Thank you for putting this up. I'm 71 & I watched all of this on my grandparents B/W TV back then in NC. Besides Apollo 11 I don't remember details. Now retired in N. Florida I have been to two Shuttle launches & only can dream of what it was like to watch some of the first manned rocket launches. Shalom
It appears that, for an astronaut, having drama with Mission Control is especially bad for your career, as illustrated by Mercury-Atlas 7 and Apollo 7.
Wally thought he could dictate the rules to Nasa, they all got what they deserved for disobeying orders; besides, he made a career out of he's "stubborn" cold.
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON eight successfully completed their missions, six of which landed two of their crew on the Lunar surface. Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
@@asifansari3430 and you, like my father, have a unique perspective, like anyone that was there to watch it.. you KNOW that those wacky internet moon-landing conspiracy theories have confused so many younger people, and I for one, think it’s important that you tell people of your experience. Most fairly intelligent people can distinguish the difference between internet garbage and verifiable facts, but there are FAR too many people that believe the conspiracies for the simple reason that they want to believe that they know something that makes them FEEL special. This “Dunning-Kruger effect” symptom is one of the things that is disturbing to see in the people we encounter in life, but I think it’s important that people that have personal experience that refutes the conspiracy garbage, speak up, even if some will ALWAYS find the conspiracies more fun than reality. This is unfortunately, just the world we live in, but keep up the good fight for intelligence! 😎
Most people referred to the progroam as "Gem en eee" even though most people say "Gem en eye". It's been said that the German engineers would say "Gem en ee" and the name stayed that way during thoughs days. Also, at 1:16:03 I believe that's Neil Armstrong's Omega Speedmaster that he's wearing on his left wrist. He never wore it on the moon, so Buzz Aldrin was the first person to wear his Speedmaster watch on the moon. It's been said that Neil left his watch hanging on the instrument panel because the built-in clock on the panel stopped working.
@@wildboar7473 Maybe they don't realize that originally, the LM was referred to as the LEM for the Lunar Excursion Module. It was later shortened to the term LM, or Lunar Module.
@@daffidavit no rather a anal antihoaxer of 20 years plus.... :) deldelahaye3811 (parts....) wildboar7473 More ignorance....the term LEM was dropped in 1967...The Apollo landers are always referred to as LMs ...pronounced LEM...but those who continue to use the acronym LEM just show they have little, or no in- depth, knowledge of the NASA Apollo missions. 😬 wildboar7473 Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...It is quite likely that the MIT program was made before that date...or they just used the old name LEM *because that was what the general public knew* ,, 🤒 The fact that some sources refer to " LM or LEM " is simply because many people do not know that the name was changed *early in the program* ..and the fact that LM is pronounced LEM does not help the willfully ignorant... 😝 The fact that other people use the term LEM is irrelevant and does not change the fact that the name was changed to LM over 50 years ago. And just because somebody referred to working on the original design of the LEMm as it was then called, *does not excuse the use of the wrong term now.* 🥵 It is not " VERY BAD " to call it the LEM now, it is just factually WRONG...and *when we are debunking conspiracy garbage we rely on getting the correct facts.. It is called attention to detail* - something conspiracy spouters continuously ignore.. 😵💫
@@daffidavit@daffidavit my thoughts exactly! When I was young (around age 10 or 11), we had this Encarta 95 (I think) Encyclopedia on the computer and I was very much interested in the space program after watching Apollo 13. The Lunar Excursion Module is one of the words I still remember clearly till this day after learning from that encyclopedia.
1:15 -"en los 50´s la vida en los Estados Unidos era buena"... Tenían buen pasar porque tenían leyes que favorecían al consumidor, no al empresario... el trabajador común y corriente tenía acceso a todo, y no tenía problemas en pagar impuestos altos (que a la postre, costearían proyectos como el programa Apollo)... Todo éso cambió 180 grados con Reagan, desde ahí hasta hoy es todo decadencia... LEYES, ahí está la clave; NO en la producción...
Only spacecraft commander, Frank Borman, was called back from training in Downey California to Houston to discuss the proposed switch to a lunar orbit mission. Borman alone made the decision. Lovell and Anders, along with Armstrong, Aldrin, and Haise were not at the meeting, and had no input on the decision. How the producers of this documentary missed that well documented fact is odd to say the least. The archival footage is not from that meeting. Original Apollo 8 commander, Jim McDivitt was first asked if he wanted the lunar orbit mission, but decided to stay with the first test flight of the lunar lander. Nothing new, or special here. Just more of what has already been done in other documentaries.
1:08:20 There it is again. I think that's a MYTH. I cannot IMAGINE that crew trying to make an unauthorized landing. Your whole life is building to this moment, and you are going to BLOW it by performing some stunt, for which neither they nor the guys on the ground had made any plans. I think that's utter BS. I'm sure they short-fueled the LM because the extra fuel was simply unnecessary. On space missions, you're always looking for ways to save whatever weight you can, and I'm sure that was just one more of those cases.
NASA is still dreaming that their Lie would come true AFTER China landed her astronauts on the Moon . Dream on NASA. Prices are going up and American GDP is crashing !
"he flew over South America at night" It is suspicious but not strong evidence unless combined with other inconsistencies. Gagarin was not a geographer and may have confused one mountain for another.
Lost count how many times ive watch this Nasa to the moon . A bit help from aussie space honeysuckle creek You got look it up this was a new area of tech that change the world .
Aussies should also know about the 64-meter radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was responsible for receiving the signals from most of the 2 ½ - hour Moonwalk.
That is incorrect. Earth’s curvature is visible, even to the naked eye, from an altitude of 10 km. We have thousands of photos from the ISS that clearly show curvature.
I often wondered why the incomplete and curtailed missions were ever considered "embarrassments". How could that be? They were doing things never done before! This is one of the best documentaries I have seen. Lots of footage I have never seen before and I thought I had seen everything! Absolutely marvellous !
The narrator says at 3:38 "Coast-to-coast, citizens were watching" the failed Vanguard launch of December 6, 1957. In fact, the launch was not televised live. An article on page 76 of the December 16, 1957 issue of the magazine "Broadcasting" says, "WTVT (TV) Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. aired 400 feet of film of the explosion of the Vanguard missile one hour and 50 minutes after the earth satellite burst into flames Dec. 6 at Cape Canaveral, Fla., 110 miles from the station. Roger Sharp, a WTVT newscaster, and a 2-man camera crew...covered the explosion from four miles away and rushed the film to WTVT by chartered plane. WTVT supplied prints for stations in New York, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Montgomery, Louisville and Miami in time for newscasts that same day."
JFK said the end of the decade. In this entire video the guy talks about 12-31-1969 being the deadline. However the deadline (decade) is actually 12-31-1970.
please explain how it works. The calendar was created by Catholic Romans who used Roman Numbers. The thought of “0” zero was not considered. The first year was “1”. There was never a 01-01-0000, instead it was 01-01-0001. Therefore a decade starts at every 20_1 and last for 10 years.
@@roccorossetti7579 You WERE home-schooled. JFK's statement about reaching the moon "by the end of the decade" referred to the 1960s, meaning before the start of 1970. This aligns with the common understanding of a decade as a span of 10 years starting from a year ending in 0 and ending in a year ending in 9 (e.g., 1960-1969). The general modern usage defines decades this way. A pseudointellectual often engages in discussions in a way that seems knowledgeable but lacks true understanding or depth.
@@Hobbes746 This is from Nature Magazine. Title: Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts. And your dilemma now will be whether to believe the scientists of the 1960s or the scientists of 2018.
@@johnmarcos1929 The Nature article is about long-duration missions, like the missions to Mars we’re currently considering. Not the two-week missions to the Moon that were done for Apollo. Modern radiation measurements show a human can spend more than a month on the moon without any radiation protection before getting to the current annual dose limit set by OSHA.
@@Hobbes746 I believe you didn't read the article. And if you read it, you didn't understand anything. No one leaves low orbit, it is no coincidence that planet Earth is known as the cradle. In addition to the dangers of solar and cosmic radiation, there are other risks that intelligent people close their eyes to avoid seeing.
Ha! Well done, but this is an old troll idea. Better to do the flat-earth troll these days! You get better results by saying “the earf am be FLAT!” And the regular people get all mad.. suuuuuper funny for us trollz, AM EYE RITE??? Tee-hee!
Artemis is fantastic but for some reason it doesn't quite hold the allure Apollo had! My age obviously has something to do with that. This is a young person's game and I wish all people working on the Artemis, good luck and godspeed!
56:1756:4256:5358:051:00:49 1:17:18 I like that when filming flights from inside a spaceship, there is always a blue sky outside the window. There was always good weather in space lol
I know you're obviously trolling, but just in case you are new to general Space Science, or have read little on the matter ( I'm 52, so was educated at a time when you needed to read on subjects extensively, unlike today), let me try to explain. The Blue Sky, as you call it, is apparent because the camera, or window, is looking DOWN at the earth below. The atmosphere of the earth, especially in Low Earth Orbit, always looks blue. If the camera was looking out into the blackness of space, you would see nothing. The astronauts would see stars, but the Camera, and by extension we the viewer, cannot resolve stars, so the sky looks black. Go outside tonight and snap off one pic of the sky and look at the image. You will see no stars. Maybe Venus, or the moon if its bright enough, but no stars. You need a long exposure of more than a second to see any stars. Some phones, on night mode, will do it automatically, but generally no.
@Hiram1000 "The Astronauts would see stars"? Wonder why Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins couldn't see them while they went to the moon and back with Apollo 11. Nor did others from Apollo 12 through 17! THEIR own words! Look into it!
@@aok4418 The only instances where the flag moves is when the astronauts are working on the flag, and during the LM liftoff when rocket exhaust flows past the flag. In between, we have hours of footage of the flag staying completely stationary in a way that we can’t replicate on Earth.
sa obzirom na rast tehnologije u odnosu na prije 60 godina, danas bi trebali imati kolonije na planetama koje nas okružuju, ali, činjenica je da čovjek nije bio na mjesecu zadnjih 60 godina jer kako bi rekli, mi neznamo kako to izvest... da se čovjek zapita, nazadujemo li ili napredujemo????
@@michael.forkert As evidence for the moon landings, we have: - 382 kg of lunar rock samples available to any geologist, - hours of live TV and film, - more than 8000 photos, - scientific results from every experiment they did, - thousands of technical documents that show how they did it. We can analyze this evidence, and have been doing that for 50 years now, In all that time, not one of these items has been found to be fake. For example, the Apollo videos show they're in 1/6 g gravity, which we cannot replicate on Earth today, which proves those videos were not recorded on Earth, but on the moon. In addition, we have confirmation from multiple independent sources: - amateur astronomers could see the CSM/LM on their way to the Moon. - in several countries including the USSR, people monitored Apollo spacecraft radio transmissions. Radio astronomers used their telescopes to monitor transmissions, confirming they were transmitting from the moon. - in the 50 years since the landings, thousands of geologists all over the world have examined lunar rock samples and found they don't look like the rocks we find on Earth. - The NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and India's Chandrayaan 2 orbiter has photographed the Apollo landing sites, with enough resolution to show the foot tracks of the astronauts. - Japan's Selene lunar orbiter has mapped the Apollo landing sites and found the topography matches that seen in Apollo photos. - laser reflectors were left on the moon by the Apollo missions, and can be pinged from Earth by anyone with a powerful laser.
Where was the lunar lander tested unmanned on the moon surface. Had The landings been real they would have carried a lunar lander to the Moon by Apollo and landed it unmanned on the surface as a test. If that never happened don't ask me to believe that we went to the Moon.
Why? The lander was test flown in Earth orbit and in lunar orbit. What would have been learned by landing a unmanned module on the Moon? The landing struts, which were designed to compress, had been extensively tested on Earth, so I ask again, what would have been learned by landing an unmanned module on the Moon? To me, your assertion that an unmanned landing on the Moon was necessary is simple ill informed.
@@jakepopalo Советский Луноход в ноябре 1970 первым прилунился на Луне и забрал на Землю содержимое лунной поверхности. Советский космонавт первым в космос полетел, Советский спутник первым был выведен на орбиту
@@sarkissati1217 в 69году Аполлон11 прилунился,два астронавта погуляли по Луне и уже вернулся с Луны,доставил десятки кг.реголита. А ты тычешь свой лохоход🤣🤣🤣 А фейк о "полете" Гагарина своей бабушке расскажи. Все космические достижения ссср благодаря украинцу С.П.Королеву ,группе немецких ученых создавшие А4( ФАУ2) Где доказательства "полета " Гагарина!?Их нет,нет ни видео ,нет ни Гагарина...🤣
@@sarkissati1217Sovjeti su čestitali amerikancima kad su se spustili na mjesec. To ne bi napravili da spuštanja nije bilo. Inače, Lunohod je prvi automat koji je "šetao" mjesecom, i sve ostalo ste u pravu, ali amerikanci su jedini slali ljude.
"The result of an unprecedented surge in scientific and engineering activity with remarkable spin-offs… in less than 9 years the United States went from space amateur to technological hyperpower". That's proof of how humans could do amazing things, in a relatively short period of time, if they really put their mind to it. And that's why wise Jacque Fresco stated that we must put our mind to changing the socioeconomic organization system under which our society operates as we did to put a man on the moon. Watch "The choice is ours" documentary to learn about his proposal.
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
We already have live cameras watching Earth from a much better vantage point: geostationary orbit. Weather satellites take photos of the entire hemisphere every 10 minutes.
@@JordanST-n7r No, that’s not the reason. DSCOVR operates at 1.5 million km from Earth and takes regular photos. But the photos taken from geostationary orbit are of much higher quality: the closer you get the higher the resolution. We’ve launched more than 200 spacecraft that have left Earth orbit entirely. More than 30 successful missions to the moon including 8 manned ones, of which 6 landed.
@@brianstephen5392 I used my brain to evaluate the evidence for and against the moon landing. I found that the evidence for the moon landings is solid, with no indication of fakery anywhere. The “evidence” against the moon landings turns out to be nonexistent. There is no actual evidence that shows the moon landings were faked. The moon landing deniers don’t present evidence, they only present arguments that turn out to be full of holes. People who follow the evidence have only one choice: accept that the Apollo landings are real. Believing the moon landings were faked is nothing more than wishful thinking.
@@wimkuijpers1342 Compartmentalised and the vast majority couldn't tell the difference between mock ups and the real thing, monitoring things from a screen means nothing, same with the mars pantomimes they are lying to us, some see it, most refuse to see it.
After the first manned dive to the deepest point of the ocean, it took another 50 years for another human to get there. Does that mean that first dive was a fake? Apollo was the most expensive engineering project in history. Repeating it will require a similarly gigantic investment. NASA’s current budget is only 1/10 of what it was during Apollo.
Karen Dingleberry even the "Soviet Union" when it was still the Soviet Union acknowledged that the USA had in fact landed on the moon. Along with "communist China" & other nations. None of which were friends then with the USA and now with the USA. Up voting your own stupid comment is rather - - - "Childish & Immature"~~~~!! Shalom ya Schmuck
@@terencehurst8636 : Ok, and you still don't understand physics, electronics, manufacturing engineering, chemistry, material science, to name a few? Why is that?
@@kitcanyon658 And you do? You think you understand these things combined together. I bet your education is limited to high school. Arrogant people like you are mist likely insecure she uneducated.
As has been said, in American English, "the crew WAS" is correct. If you said instead "the crew MEMBERS" - you would then use "were". The crew WAS preparing - correct The crew members WERE preparing - correct Similarly, if you were talking about a team (which is made up of multiple individual members), you wouldn't say, "The team were good"; you'd say, "The team was good." "crew" and "team" are similarly referring to a group of people. It is singular. A "batch" is referring to a group. Like a batch of eggs. You wouldn't say, "That batch were bad". You'd say "That batch WAS bad". Same concept.
@@Hobbes746 False evidence. Here's a stupid shill question for you... Show us ANY independent evidence of humans breathing low pressure (5psi and under) pure O2 for days and weeks at a time as in the comical apollo frauds. You CAN'T because every leo capsule since the hoax has astronots breathing near sea level earth O2 and N2. Waiting shill....
@@yomommaahotoo264 Campbell, 1927, was the first to study the effect of 100% O2 at low pressure on animals, for durations of up to 2 months. Clamann and Becker-Freysing spent a week in a low-pressure pure oxygen environment in 1939, they did experiments at various pressures. They were the first to establish the limits of human breathing with regards to pressure and oxygen percentage. "Space-cabin Atmospheres: Oxygen toxicity” is a review of previous research by Roth from 1964 that lists all of these.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Sure. They assassinated Grissom in a way that guaranteed massive attention would be brought to his complaints. Basically the dumbest possible way of getting rid of him. And again, you fail to present evidence for your claims.
I read back a ways and didn't see anything about it, but there is a boomerang shaped object on the right side spinning from bottom to top at 57:10 there abouts. it's not hard to see. looks out of place but I guess there was junk up there already.
No, they didn't lie back in the 60's and 70's. Real men and women figured it out and put 12 different men on the surface. If that offends your Gen Z or millennial sensibilities then I suggest you stop spending all your time playing Fortnight and get an education in engineering. It's time to adult up, son.
you mean.. no one has been able to go the moon since. I don't know how they got there.. but getting there has proved that AI and robotics are the way to go today. Machinery is much easier to land and retrieve from both the Moon and Mars... and if there is a failure.. no human lives are lost.
The radiation levels in the VA belts are low enough that normal humans can travel through them without getting a dangerous dose of radiation. We just can’t orbit in the belts indefinitely.
@@Hobbes746 The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit. Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead. Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
@@Hobbes746 Cosmic radiation is encountered in and above the radiation belts. The latest data confirms that the harsh radiation can't be tolerated without proper shielding. They didn't have it then, and they still don't have it figured out.
"Primitive technology..." 55 years ago they were splitting atoms, lanunching 300 ft rockets, and performing human heart transplants. Pretty hard to call that primitive.
@@MagicRoosterBluesBand "can't figure out how to go now," Have they tried? If they'd been working on it and burning through cash at the rate they did in the 60s/70s and couldn't make it work, then you'd have a point. But that's not the case. There has been no effort to go whatsoever until recently. What would be the incentive to risk lives and spend all that money? What can a man do on the moon that a robot cannot?
I was there, I worked on the throttle control of the Descent engine final testing !
On landing on the Moon would the engine be heard as it was about to land as we do not hear any noise from any engines on the lamb. Just commentary. Why was that?? Rockets make lots of noise
What was the weight ratio compared to Saturn 5 only being tested without a payload of the lamb and extra fuel to take it out of orbit towards the moon and to have fuel to get off the moon?Like would it be Top heavy and if the Saturn 5 worked so good why did they stop using it? Never understood that how they carried a moon buggy as well surely the Saturn 5 would have be unstable on take off. With all that weight at the top hope someone can answer this then I can understand how they did it. Lot of payload and fuel at the top mmmm. Saturn 5 would get astronauts to the space station instead of using Russians rockets?? Surely ???so is there or was there a Cold War between the USA and Russia when we use their Rockets to get to the space station don’t seem any differences there ?? To me
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT OMG OMG OMG OMG THATS SUCH A W im obsessed with nasa stuff
@@jonnny8 Since there is no atmosphere on the moon, you would not hear any sound there, but inside the lunar lander you should be able to hear it and probably feel it too.
@@jonnny8 First of all, the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon. Using it just to go to the ISS is overkill. Much simpler rockets like the Falcon are much much cheaper.
There was quite a lot of testing before landing on the moon:
January 27, 1967 Fatal plugs-out test Apollo 1.
November 9, 1967 Unmanned test flight Apollo 4.
January 22, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 5.
April 4, 1968 Unmanned test flight Apollo 6.
October 11, 1968 First manned flight Apollo 7. Testing of Command and Service module.
December 21, 1968 Apollo 8. First flight Saturn 5, First to the moon, First behind the moon.
March 3, 1969 Apollo 9. Practice with the LM around the earth.
May 18, 1969 Apollo 10. Practicing with the LM around the moon.
Project Apollo is still the most amazing memory if my teenage years & probably America's greatest achievement. They changed history in a way that will be remembered 500, even 1000 years in the future - people will still remember that Neil & Buzz walking on the moon in 1969.
58:20 I've always said that this is one of the most important photographs in human history, taken at a time of incredible instability on our fragile Earth..
"Nobody has been [back] to the moon [since]" - Kubrick made a great job of staging the landing.
Kubrick’s best efforts can be seen in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The scenes in space and on the moon are immediately recognizable as fake: they’re recorded in 1 G here on Earth. The Apollo videos show perfect 1/6 g gravity instead.
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
I remember when mom gave me my first computer and couldn't wait to talk nonsense to my buddies over the interwebs.
Too.mich judge Judy music..the rest is good
I notice that they omitted mentioning that the astronauts read from the book of Genesis on live TV during the Apollo 8 mission. That was the highlight of the mission.
Really? The highlight of the entire mission was reading from a religious text?
You live in mid-America, don'cha?
Nobody will ever bother living permanently on that god-forsaken rock.
Who in their right mind would want to live on the moon?
Old-timers from the 1960s maybe. But Taylor Swift isn't doing gigs on the moon any day soon.
Live permanently? No. But it would make a great staging post for journeys to Mars.
Considering that there are people living in antartica or greenland, i think that there will be also some who want to live on the moon.
@@0topon A researcher living temporarily for a few months in a research station at the South Pole is not usually classed as “living there” permanently. Antarctica is like Mars. As Elton John told us…..“Mars ain’t the place to raise your kids”.
@@petergibson2318 Although there are a few permanent people living in antartica, yourr right that it was a bad example.
Thank God. She apparently lives in a lot of minds rent free. Too Bad.
But why do the astronauts' helmets not match the real ones?
What? Please explain what you're talking about?
The Apollo program makes SpaceX look worryingly like a bunch of amateurs heading into disaster.
SpaceX are not amateurs. They just used a different method to develop Starship. For the Saturn V, NASA spent years testing individual stages on huge test stands before committing to a first launch.
SpaceX moved to doing launches much earlier in the development cycle. They knew that the hard part was not to get the stages to work, the hard part is developing the heat shield, and that is almost impossible to simulate here on the surface. You need to do test flights for that.
I do have confidence in SpaceX. It's amazing to see how they can land their boosters on a stamp.
@@Hobbes746 The lack of integrated testing by SpaceX is courting disaster. Iterating through problems that actually happen doesn't solve problems that haven't happened yet. Musk is very impatient and that quality is going to kill a bunch of passengers someday. I hope I'm wrong.
SpaceX doesn't have the blank cheque, but they're doing it!
Well, given that NASA just made the decision to have SpaceX perform a rescue mission bc their buddies at Boeing produced a stayliner instead of a star liner...your comment aged real well.
They figured it out life never really happened either this is all a big dream…
Who's they?
Yeah to Augmental Reality 😂
The amount of brain rot and lack of critical thinking in this comment section is astounding
it's scary...
Yah there are allot of special people running around in here, I bet allot of them are bots. The rest are just the crazies with no brain and no life who wish they could be the next famous person but will work their jobs sweeping and mopping the floors.
@@danielecognome7501 And so are our current times. The US is facing its most critical "launch" come 2024 year end. May you vote with your heart and test your decision against what your mind knows.
They can’t understand it, so ‘it didn’t happen’. It’s quite incredible.
These are the folks that rot their brains on TikTok all day and haven’t read a book, perhaps ever. The same ones that ask me how to cook ramen noodles when their microwave doesn’t work.
Outstanding presentation
Well-researched and put together
Includes rare video footage
people who say this is fake is mocking the blood, tear, and sweat of all the engineers, technician, and all staff of this program.
@@sillybilly8028 : No, it's not. That's just uneducated people making things up because they feel less-than.
@@sillybilly8028 You wouldn't recognize reality if it hit you over your empty head.
The moon landings were FAKE AF! Get with the program, old fart!
This is fake and the NDA by all involved is the only thing that is mocking.
@@sillybilly8028 Real? Like your girlfriend's lips, eh?
Watched Apollo 11 launch as a schoolboy at Woomera Rocket Range in South Australia. Less than 7 years later I was a shift tech at Orroral Valley tracking station outside Canberra and we supported the multiple ALSEP experiments installed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts.
These moon landing deniers are nuts. 😂
The worst part is that most of them are American.
So are you who believe in this crap.
Hoaxnuts
The moon landings were fake as f..k Grow some brain cells.
@@JordanST-n7r You could be right...
To me the Gemini program is underrated. And because they had a enournous test schedule and was a mission full of firsts Apollo 9 is also underrated
Apollo astronauts are more enthusiastic when you ask them questions about Gemini rather than Apollo
Yes how can your underrated the first HEO feat. As #8 and then #10 are :(
Great document thsnks for sharing
@@lifesahobby The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit.
Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead.
Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
One of the better telling docs about going to the moon. Lots of nice high quality footage I never saw (or cannot remeber having seen before...). Thanks NASA for painstakingly filming everything!
All the men from Mercury, Gemini and Apollo are some of my greatest heroes. They're the greatest pilots to ever live to alot of people... They certainly are in my book. The Crew of Apollo One will always hold a special place in my heart as well. I'm so grateful for their efforts aswell as all the Astronauts during that time.
Who’s here on July 20th 2024?
He’d july 24 2024
@@maymaypoochhuh?
It's me,and I'm from AUSTRIA. 1969 I was 15 years old and until now i'm very impressed about the MOONLANDING.
July 26th 2024
@@wilhelmbauer8844einen Bauhelm will er, der Wilhelm Bauer 👷♂️
Bring back 1960s technology I guess.
🤥
Y'kno? Lol.
I think it's less an issue of technology and more an issue of will.
@@christopheryoder8292
I was being sarcastic. The US has never landed humans on the moon in the 60s - 70s.
🇺🇲
@@christopheryoder8292 Thats not what NASA or Elon or anyone is saying. The will is very strong but the tech is not there. imagine? How is THAT possible? China, Russia, India, Europe, Japan, everybody cannot land men on the moon and bring them back safely. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. We never did. The moon is too much of a challenge. Danger beyond imagination. Lets see when they can do it again. They want to build a moonbase to get to Mars? Lets wait and see. Impossible in our lifetime. I will apologise when I am wrong.
~~ From the day JFK made the challenge in 1962 to put men on the moon before the end of the decade - NASA basically had a blank check to make it happen - but they also had the engineering talent ( and the drive & the discipline ) to make it happen - only when they had to make Apollo 17 the final manned mission in 1972 were the economic realities taking hold - the space shuttle was supposed to be the cost-saving alternative - but it never was that. Now it's just all about putting more satellites in orbit - making collisions an ever-increasing danger - and of course space tourism - for rich folks ..
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University.
Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back.
After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13
Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet.
Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts.
Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo.
Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive.
Can we still see the landingsites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).
80,000 people can be claimed to make a car. If they fake drive the car onto a football field, do all 80,000 need to witness it?
Now instead of science in the White House we have baggies of cocaine.
And Hunter sitting in the White House meetings.🙄
The Trump admin was chock full of drugs. I think that's why they're so unpleasant and detached from reality. Their brains are literally swiss cheese.
Or lists of political targets that a small child is obsessed with taking revenge on.
Settle now children
Trump a convicted criminal
I like how music change from USSR to US mood!
If you are reading some of the comments here , you will find so many people who lack conviction in their argument about humans not going to the moon . Thats why people argue , they want someone to do the homework for them.. until then they suffer the doubts .
This us what happens when you are given choices to study physics , organic chemistry and you say " its too hard " you end up never developing a mind with conceptual capacity .. and you might always pick the easy way from that point on .
Its just laziness to doubt and its crazy to argue with them .
If you had some guy running across ten lanes of highway, it would be really silly to run across the road with them telling them theyre doing something stupid .
So dont argue with them .. youll never change those who never took the ambitious subjects . Youll find behind them all is a lack of physics , science, objectivity , conceptual thought .
And that's why they rattle like they do .
Here to india .. with the first woman , here to christina cock , heres to the apollo program , vostok, gemini , and all the brave ones who risked it all to inspire us .
Gods speed .. 77 tons all the way m may the force be with you and may peace be with those who just dont know .
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@@zollen123
Please explain better your question
@@lifesahobby Yet, no human has ever walked on the moon. The only scary thing is that there are still people who believe it happened.
@lifesahobby Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated
@@lifesahobby
Can't get past the Van Allen Belts, bud. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Do you honestly believe anyone and everyone who knows that the landings were fake are simply too lazy, uneducated or lack the understanding of physics, science, etc....? Is that why there are scientists, engineers etc.... all over the world who are very educated that agree NASA faked the landings. What do you say to that? Wake up!
Thank you for putting this up. I'm 71 & I watched all of this on my grandparents B/W TV back then in NC. Besides Apollo 11 I don't remember details. Now retired in N. Florida I have been to two Shuttle launches & only can dream of what it was like to watch some of the first manned rocket launches. Shalom
Oy!
It appears that, for an astronaut, having drama with Mission Control is especially bad for your career, as illustrated by Mercury-Atlas 7 and Apollo 7.
Wally thought he could dictate the rules to Nasa, they all got what they deserved for disobeying orders; besides, he made a career out of he's "stubborn" cold.
Wally announced he’d retire after Apollo 7 but other 2 never flew but did ground staff duties.
@@briandunn6342 never heard that before, and it was made clear by Chris Kraft that the crew of 7 would never fly again due to disobedience.
*A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON eight successfully completed their missions, six of which landed two of their crew on the Lunar surface. Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that !
I was in high school, in Lahore, Pakistan...I watched the landing in news...I still have my diary entry on this event
Was there any appreciable reaction or opinion in Lahore?!?
@@asifansari3430 and you, like my father, have a unique perspective, like anyone that was there to watch it.. you KNOW that those wacky internet moon-landing conspiracy theories have confused so many younger people, and I for one, think it’s important that you tell people of your experience. Most fairly intelligent people can distinguish the difference between internet garbage and verifiable facts, but there are FAR too many people that believe the conspiracies for the simple reason that they want to believe that they know something that makes them FEEL special. This “Dunning-Kruger effect” symptom is one of the things that is disturbing to see in the people we encounter in life, but I think it’s important that people that have personal experience that refutes the conspiracy garbage, speak up, even if some will ALWAYS find the conspiracies more fun than reality. This is unfortunately, just the world we live in, but keep up the good fight for intelligence! 😎
Could not watch this. The background music was so annoying and unnecessary. Why waste a decent documentary with that .😊
An empty vessel makes the most noise .
Spot on
The music is to loud…!
Elon said that his company will have humans on the moon by 2023,that didn't happen, smh
Musk is a homophobic snake oil salesman.
SO?
Eh Space and Rockets are hard. It's still phenomenal that SpaceX can land and reuse the Falcon 9. Something no one thought was possible.
and no return for 52 years and counting.
No reason to return.
What a lies
1:40 - ei ollut elämä USAssa mitään kapitalismia edes 1950-luvulla.
Most people referred to the progroam as "Gem en eee" even though most people say "Gem en eye". It's been said that the German engineers would say "Gem en ee" and the name stayed that way during thoughs days. Also, at 1:16:03 I believe that's Neil Armstrong's Omega Speedmaster that he's wearing on his left wrist. He never wore it on the moon, so Buzz Aldrin was the first person to wear his Speedmaster watch on the moon. It's been said that Neil left his watch hanging on the instrument panel because the built-in clock on the panel stopped working.
O well Some lament prononciation of LM with lem.... apparently ignorant to do so.
@@wildboar7473 Maybe they don't realize that originally, the LM was referred to as the LEM for the Lunar Excursion Module. It was later shortened to the term LM, or Lunar Module.
@@daffidavit no rather a anal antihoaxer of 20 years plus.... :)
deldelahaye3811 (parts....)
wildboar7473 More ignorance....the term LEM was dropped in 1967...The Apollo landers are always referred to as LMs ...pronounced LEM...but those who continue to use the acronym LEM just show they have little, or no in- depth, knowledge of the NASA Apollo missions. 😬
wildboar7473 Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...It is quite likely that the MIT program was made before that date...or they just used the old name LEM *because that was what the general public knew* ,, 🤒
The fact that some sources refer to " LM or LEM " is simply because many people do not know that the name was changed *early in the program* ..and the fact that LM is pronounced LEM does not help the willfully ignorant... 😝
The fact that other people use the term LEM is irrelevant and does not change the fact that the name was changed to LM over 50 years ago. And just because somebody referred to working on the original design of the LEMm as it was then called, *does not excuse the use of the wrong term now.* 🥵
It is not " VERY BAD " to call it the LEM now, it is just factually WRONG...and *when we are debunking conspiracy garbage we rely on getting the correct facts.. It is called attention to detail* - something conspiracy spouters continuously ignore.. 😵💫
@@daffidavit@daffidavit my thoughts exactly! When I was young (around age 10 or 11), we had this Encarta 95 (I think) Encyclopedia on the computer and I was very much interested in the space program after watching Apollo 13. The Lunar Excursion Module is one of the words I still remember clearly till this day after learning from that encyclopedia.
1:15 -"en los 50´s la vida en los Estados Unidos era buena"... Tenían buen pasar porque tenían leyes que favorecían al consumidor, no al empresario... el trabajador común y corriente tenía acceso a todo, y no tenía problemas en pagar impuestos altos (que a la postre, costearían proyectos como el programa Apollo)... Todo éso cambió 180 grados con Reagan, desde ahí hasta hoy es todo decadencia... LEYES, ahí está la clave; NO en la producción...
Only the need to overtake the USSR forced the USA to pump such huge funds into the lunar program
You mean - pump so much money into the lunar frauds.
If US won this round of space race against China, do you think US will continue the space exploration?
@@zollen123 гонка китая? у китая другие заботы
Only the need to stay ahead of the US forced the USSR to pump huge finds into their lunar program.
Only spacecraft commander, Frank Borman, was called back from training in Downey California to Houston to discuss the proposed switch to a lunar orbit mission. Borman alone made the decision. Lovell and Anders, along with Armstrong, Aldrin, and Haise were not at the meeting, and had no input on the decision. How the producers of this documentary missed that well documented fact is odd to say the least. The archival footage is not from that meeting. Original Apollo 8 commander, Jim McDivitt was first asked if he wanted the lunar orbit mission, but decided to stay with the first test flight of the lunar lander. Nothing new, or special here. Just more of what has already been done in other documentaries.
1:08:20 There it is again. I think that's a MYTH. I cannot IMAGINE that crew trying to make an unauthorized landing. Your whole life is building to this moment, and you are going to BLOW it by performing some stunt, for which neither they nor the guys on the ground had made any plans. I think that's utter BS. I'm sure they short-fueled the LM because the extra fuel was simply unnecessary. On space missions, you're always looking for ways to save whatever weight you can, and I'm sure that was just one more of those cases.
Gotta improvise sometimes, you overly skeptical post-truth zombie.
@@00govan00 Bite me. Even if you were being sarcastic.
NASA is still dreaming that their Lie would come true AFTER China landed her astronauts on the Moon .
Dream on NASA. Prices are going up and American GDP is crashing !
There was more fuel than was specified and Armstring knew it.
He was in command.
Heck if it were me in that situation I'd have gone for it too.
@@villagegirl68 Pay attention. My comment was about Apollo 10, not Apollo 11.
Ayo appolo tampilkan buat ambil baru hajar Aswad buat appolo kerjakan apa masih tidur pagi kah???🌹🌹🌹🙏
From dream to dream
"he flew over South America at night"
It is suspicious but not strong evidence unless combined with other inconsistencies. Gagarin was not a geographer and may have confused one mountain for another.
Lost count how many times ive watch this Nasa to the moon .
A bit help from aussie space honeysuckle creek You got look it up this was a new area of tech that change the world .
Aussies should also know about the 64-meter radio telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was responsible for receiving the signals from most of the 2 ½ - hour Moonwalk.
Foir a good, almost true, story and a good laugh, watch THE DISH! Love it!
41:06 apollo 1
To the moon, Alice!
Honeymooners?
satanic lies
@@thrummer1953 Duh!
@@thrummer1953 🙂
loved the Honeymooners...
At 51:22 that is not a Saturn -1B, that is a block 1 Saturn. Get it correct, guys, or leave it out. So much for "best documentary".
Noone sees curvature from low Orbit..
That is incorrect. Earth’s curvature is visible, even to the naked eye, from an altitude of 10 km. We have thousands of photos from the ISS that clearly show curvature.
@@Hobbes746 he's talking about when the lead singer of Hermans Hermits Peter Noone went up to the ISS...
Of course they do. Where did you get that from?
@@Hobbes746
No its not..
Who gave u that crazy idea..a
@@nickfraser2434 no they really dont..
You watch to much Nasa tv
I often wondered why the incomplete and curtailed missions were ever considered "embarrassments". How could that be? They were doing things never done before!
This is one of the best documentaries I have seen. Lots of footage I have never seen before and I thought I had seen everything! Absolutely marvellous !
From dream to fakearie
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images.
The narrator says at 3:38 "Coast-to-coast, citizens were watching" the failed Vanguard launch of December 6, 1957. In fact, the launch was not televised live. An article on page 76 of the December 16, 1957 issue of the magazine "Broadcasting" says, "WTVT (TV) Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. aired 400 feet of film of the explosion of the Vanguard missile one hour and 50 minutes after the earth satellite burst into flames Dec. 6 at Cape Canaveral, Fla., 110 miles from the station. Roger Sharp, a WTVT newscaster, and a 2-man camera crew...covered the explosion from four miles away and rushed the film to WTVT by chartered plane. WTVT supplied prints for stations in New York, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Montgomery, Louisville and Miami in time for newscasts that same day."
JFK said the end of the decade. In this entire video the guy talks about 12-31-1969 being the deadline. However the deadline (decade) is actually 12-31-1970.
That's not how decades work. Were you home-schooled? 🙄
please explain how it works.
The calendar was created by Catholic Romans who used Roman Numbers. The thought of “0” zero was not considered.
The first year was “1”. There was never a 01-01-0000, instead it was 01-01-0001.
Therefore a decade starts at every 20_1 and last for 10 years.
@@roccorossetti7579 You WERE home-schooled. JFK's statement about reaching the moon "by the end of the decade" referred to the 1960s, meaning before the start of 1970. This aligns with the common understanding of a decade as a span of 10 years starting from a year ending in 0 and ending in a year ending in 9 (e.g., 1960-1969). The general modern usage defines decades this way. A pseudointellectual often engages in discussions in a way that seems knowledgeable but lacks true understanding or depth.
@@roccorossetti7579JFK said the “60’s” which meant the 60’s, NOT 1970
@@respectdawildo_danjones508 No where did JFK say 60's.
They NEVER went to the moon.
False. A ton of evidence proves 9 Apollo missions went to the moon, and 6 of those landed on the moon.
@@Hobbes746 This is from Nature Magazine.
Title: Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts.
And your dilemma now will be whether to believe the scientists of the 1960s or the scientists of 2018.
@@johnmarcos1929 The Nature article is about long-duration missions, like the missions to Mars we’re currently considering. Not the two-week missions to the Moon that were done for Apollo.
Modern radiation measurements show a human can spend more than a month on the moon without any radiation protection before getting to the current annual dose limit set by OSHA.
@@Hobbes746 I believe you didn't read the article. And if you read it, you didn't understand anything. No one leaves low orbit, it is no coincidence that planet Earth is known as the cradle. In addition to the dangers of solar and cosmic radiation, there are other risks that intelligent people close their eyes to avoid seeing.
Ha! Well done, but this is an old troll idea. Better to do the flat-earth troll these days! You get better results by saying “the earf am be FLAT!” And the regular people get all mad.. suuuuuper funny for us trollz, AM EYE RITE??? Tee-hee!
Now I wonder how this compares to the current Artemis missions.
The budget.
@@ApolloKid1961 Yeah I think that's a big one!
Artemis is fantastic but for some reason it doesn't quite hold the allure Apollo had! My age obviously has something to do with that. This is a young person's game and I wish all people working on the Artemis, good luck and godspeed!
56:17 56:42 56:53 58:05 1:00:49 1:17:18 I like that when filming flights from inside a spaceship, there is always a blue sky outside the window. There was always good weather in space lol
I know you're obviously trolling, but just in case you are new to general Space Science, or have read little on the matter ( I'm 52, so was educated at a time when you needed to read on subjects extensively, unlike today), let me try to explain.
The Blue Sky, as you call it, is apparent because the camera, or window, is looking DOWN at the earth below. The atmosphere of the earth, especially in Low Earth Orbit, always looks blue. If the camera was looking out into the blackness of space, you would see nothing. The astronauts would see stars, but the Camera, and by extension we the viewer, cannot resolve stars, so the sky looks black. Go outside tonight and snap off one pic of the sky and look at the image. You will see no stars. Maybe Venus, or the moon if its bright enough, but no stars. You need a long exposure of more than a second to see any stars. Some phones, on night mode, will do it automatically, but generally no.
@Hiram1000
"The Astronauts would see stars"?
Wonder why Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins couldn't see them while they went to the moon and back with Apollo 11.
Nor did others from Apollo 12 through 17!
THEIR own words!
Look into it!
Wow thank you for uploading. While it seemed intermidable, it was relatively comprehensive as well.
Best documentary so far.
KENYA TO LAND ITS FIRST MAN ON THE MOON BY 2032
Bad Joke
usituaibishe buda delete
You mean the UK, it means the same thing!
Life in the 1950s was good? Unless you were poor or black. Give me a break...
Looks WORTHLESS and like LIES.
Verifiable reality.
@@Hobbes746
Fake landings, deal with it.
Do you like the flag blowing in the wind on multiple missions?
@@Hobbes746
Fake moon landings.
@@Hobbes746
Fake
@@aok4418 The only instances where the flag moves is when the astronauts are working on the flag, and during the LM liftoff when rocket exhaust flows past the flag. In between, we have hours of footage of the flag staying completely stationary in a way that we can’t replicate on Earth.
sa obzirom na rast tehnologije u odnosu na prije 60 godina, danas bi trebali imati kolonije na planetama koje nas okružuju, ali, činjenica je da čovjek nije bio na mjesecu zadnjih 60 godina jer kako bi rekli, mi neznamo kako to izvest... da se čovjek zapita, nazadujemo li ili napredujemo????
What would be the motivation to put men back on the moon? What could men do there that a robot could not?
My dog ate my homework. 🙄
From Dream to Science Fiction.
Reality, as proven by a ton of evidence. You have nothing to support your claims.
@@Hobbes746 _Verbosity about evidence, are no evidence at all. Videos even less._
@@michael.forkert As evidence for the moon landings, we have:
- 382 kg of lunar rock samples available to any geologist,
- hours of live TV and film,
- more than 8000 photos,
- scientific results from every experiment they did,
- thousands of technical documents that show how they did it.
We can analyze this evidence, and have been doing that for 50 years now, In all that time, not one of these items has been found to be fake.
For example, the Apollo videos show they're in 1/6 g gravity, which we cannot replicate on Earth today, which proves those videos were not recorded on Earth, but on the moon.
In addition, we have confirmation from multiple independent sources:
- amateur astronomers could see the CSM/LM on their way to the Moon.
- in several countries including the USSR, people monitored Apollo spacecraft radio transmissions. Radio astronomers used their telescopes to monitor transmissions, confirming they were transmitting from the moon.
- in the 50 years since the landings, thousands of geologists all over the world have examined lunar rock samples and found they don't look like the rocks we find on Earth.
- The NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and India's Chandrayaan 2 orbiter has photographed the Apollo landing sites, with enough resolution to show the foot tracks of the astronauts.
- Japan's Selene lunar orbiter has mapped the Apollo landing sites and found the topography matches that seen in Apollo photos.
- laser reflectors were left on the moon by the Apollo missions, and can be pinged from Earth by anyone with a powerful laser.
A correction in Gemini 3 flew March 23 1965 but video script says July.
In Gemini 4 closing Ed White hatch after the EVA was the problem.
35:00 Sounds like the People's Court.
Where was the lunar lander tested unmanned on the moon surface. Had The landings been real they would have carried a lunar lander to the Moon by Apollo and landed it unmanned on the surface as a test. If that never happened don't ask me to believe that we went to the Moon.
Why? The lander was test flown in Earth orbit and in lunar orbit. What would have been learned by landing a unmanned module on the Moon? The landing struts, which were designed to compress, had been extensively tested on Earth, so I ask again, what would have been learned by landing an unmanned module on the Moon?
To me, your assertion that an unmanned landing on the Moon was necessary is simple ill informed.
The Shuttle never been tested. The first mission is the actual test. Isn't that scarier?
Very nice informatic ❤
❤ Слава Советской космонавтики ❤
❤
4 запуски Н1,і всі провальні😂😂😂.Який Слава?😅
@@jakepopalo Советский Луноход в ноябре 1970 первым прилунился на Луне и забрал на Землю содержимое лунной поверхности. Советский космонавт первым в космос полетел, Советский спутник первым был выведен на орбиту
@@sarkissati1217 в 69году Аполлон11 прилунился,два астронавта погуляли по Луне и уже вернулся с Луны,доставил десятки кг.реголита.
А ты тычешь свой лохоход🤣🤣🤣
А фейк о "полете" Гагарина своей бабушке расскажи.
Все космические достижения ссср благодаря украинцу С.П.Королеву ,группе немецких ученых создавшие А4( ФАУ2)
Где доказательства "полета "
Гагарина!?Их нет,нет ни видео ,нет ни Гагарина...🤣
@@sarkissati1217Sovjeti su čestitali amerikancima kad su se spustili na mjesec. To ne bi napravili da spuštanja nije bilo. Inače, Lunohod je prvi automat koji je "šetao" mjesecom, i sve ostalo ste u pravu, ali amerikanci su jedini slali ljude.
"The result of an unprecedented surge in scientific and engineering activity with remarkable spin-offs… in less than 9 years the United States went from space amateur to technological hyperpower". That's proof of how humans could do amazing things, in a relatively short period of time, if they really put their mind to it. And that's why wise Jacque Fresco stated that we must put our mind to changing the socioeconomic organization system under which our society operates as we did to put a man on the moon. Watch "The choice is ours" documentary to learn about his proposal.
Hollywood movi
nope, reality.
Ask Chris Nolan if he wants to make the same TV series 6 times with the same set and bad equipment and only different actors, what do you think his answer will be?
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images.
What is the Russian songs called 🤔
There should be at least a live camera on the moon.
People believe in politicians and leaders, they would believe every lie served.
We already have live cameras watching Earth from a much better vantage point: geostationary orbit. Weather satellites take photos of the entire hemisphere every 10 minutes.
@@Hobbes746 And the reason is they can't go further than that.
@@JordanST-n7r No, that’s not the reason. DSCOVR operates at 1.5 million km from Earth and takes regular photos.
But the photos taken from geostationary orbit are of much higher quality: the closer you get the higher the resolution.
We’ve launched more than 200 spacecraft that have left Earth orbit entirely. More than 30 successful missions to the moon including 8 manned ones, of which 6 landed.
@@Hobbes746 Now I am persuaded.
I have more confidence in science.
Is this Martin Clunes narrating..??
Bunch of liars never went anywhere ever!
Nope. Tons of evidence proves the Apollo missions reached the moon.
@@Hobbes746 You must be the only one left believing those pantomimes, what would you do with a brain if you had one?
@@brianstephen5392 I used my brain to evaluate the evidence for and against the moon landing.
I found that the evidence for the moon landings is solid, with no indication of fakery anywhere.
The “evidence” against the moon landings turns out to be nonexistent. There is no actual evidence that shows the moon landings were faked. The moon landing deniers don’t present evidence, they only present arguments that turn out to be full of holes.
People who follow the evidence have only one choice: accept that the Apollo landings are real.
Believing the moon landings were faked is nothing more than wishful thinking.
That would have been about 400,000 liars. It's great that they were all able to keep their mouths shut.
@@wimkuijpers1342 Compartmentalised and the vast majority couldn't tell the difference between mock ups and the real thing, monitoring things from a screen means nothing, same with the mars pantomimes they are lying to us, some see it, most refuse to see it.
📺propaganda
😂😂
Well, let's spend a hundred billion dollars (expressed in today's money value), put 400,000 people to work for 10 years just for propaganda?
BS
"...to the moon, Alice!!!..."
Hey hey, Ralphy boy! 👍😉
Big Hoax 😂
Yes you are 😂
And the Village Idiot arrives with its Foil Hat. I'd call you a man but that would insult men 😂
Ти деградант з росії?😂😂😂
You prob think the earth is flat too. LMMFAO 😂😂 🥴🥴
@renz758
Title of this video should be:
From dream to hoax
big dream but never come LOL.. maybe soon when dinosaurs will alive again 🤣🤣🤣
so sorry for your partner...
some comments certainly build a strong case for neutering
No way this happened
@@kitchenerleslie6177 not sure that's got anything to do with it. Get that sleeve rolled up dude....
@@rickreid8572 Conspiracy theorists are simple as f.
@@kitchenerleslie6177 how many did you take? Get that sleeve up further man!
@@rickreid8572 Rick, yer dumb.
@@rickreid8572 Hope you haven't procreated. We have enough science denying we todds already.
❤
imagine we haven't been there for another 52 years. We never went to the Moon for sure!
After the first manned dive to the deepest point of the ocean, it took another 50 years for another human to get there. Does that mean that first dive was a fake?
Apollo was the most expensive engineering project in history. Repeating it will require a similarly gigantic investment. NASA’s current budget is only 1/10 of what it was during Apollo.
'We' have been there. 6 times.
Just a thought, it's been over 20 years since Concorde last flew commercially.
As evidence......The term "numb nuts" was created for a reason.
Indias Chandrayaan-2 took images of two of the Apollo landing sites. Go google the images and see
from dream to lie
Karen Dingleberry even the "Soviet Union" when it was still the Soviet Union acknowledged that the USA had in fact landed on the moon. Along with "communist China" & other nations. None of which were friends then with the USA and now with the USA. Up voting your own stupid comment is rather - - - "Childish & Immature"~~~~!! Shalom ya Schmuck
Keep on dreaming.
It's never to late to get a college degree in engineering, son.
@@kitcanyon658 I have a lot more then that👨🎓
@@terencehurst8636 : Ok, and you still don't understand physics, electronics, manufacturing engineering, chemistry, material science, to name a few?
Why is that?
@@kitcanyon658 And you do? You think you understand these things combined together. I bet your education is limited to high school. Arrogant people like you are mist likely insecure she uneducated.
@kitcanyon658
Be specific. What are the physics, electronics, manufacturing, chemistry, material, and science they don't understand?
The crew "were" preparing! Not was preparing. Not a good start for the first sentence of the film. I'll give it a few more mins. 😢
They're not incorrect. In American English collective nouns tend to be treated as singular--"the family is" "the audience was" &tc.
As has been said, in American English, "the crew WAS" is correct. If you said instead "the crew MEMBERS" - you would then use "were".
The crew WAS preparing - correct
The crew members WERE preparing - correct
Similarly, if you were talking about a team (which is made up of multiple individual members), you wouldn't say, "The team were good"; you'd say, "The team was good."
"crew" and "team" are similarly referring to a group of people. It is singular. A "batch" is referring to a group. Like a batch of eggs.
You wouldn't say, "That batch were bad". You'd say "That batch WAS bad". Same concept.
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg I'm a USAmerican and i say "they audience were," just to be a pest.
LOL - All staged folks.
Nope. All reality, and supported by tons of evidence. You, on the other hand, have nothing.
@@Hobbes746
False evidence.
Here's a stupid shill question for you...
Show us ANY independent evidence of humans breathing low pressure (5psi and under) pure O2 for days and weeks at a time as in the comical apollo frauds.
You CAN'T because every leo capsule since the hoax has astronots breathing near sea level earth O2 and N2.
Waiting shill....
My replies might be deleted by you shills but we all know it was a fraud.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Nope. We don't know that at all. As I said before, there is *no evidence* for your claims. Absolutely none whatsoever.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Campbell, 1927, was the first to study the effect of 100% O2 at low pressure on animals, for durations of up to 2 months. Clamann and Becker-Freysing spent a week in a low-pressure pure oxygen environment in 1939, they did experiments at various pressures. They were the first to establish the limits of human breathing with regards to pressure and oxygen percentage.
"Space-cabin Atmospheres: Oxygen toxicity” is a review of previous research by Roth from 1964 that lists all of these.
From dream to dream
“From dream to Hoax” more like it
300+B USD, 400K+ engineers & life of 3 astronauts were needed just to create a Hoax? Yeah right
@@RoyalBengalAviation
Grissom, White, and Chaffee assassinated because Grissom was spilling the beans in the hoax shill.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Sure. They assassinated Grissom in a way that guaranteed massive attention would be brought to his complaints. Basically the dumbest possible way of getting rid of him. And again, you fail to present evidence for your claims.
@@Hobbes746
And that wasn't the only assassination they got away with.
@@yomommaahotoo264 and yet again you are making claims that are not supported by evidence. Apollo 1 was an accident, nothing more.
I read back a ways and didn't see anything about it, but there is a boomerang shaped object on the right side spinning from bottom to top at 57:10 there abouts. it's not hard to see. looks out of place but I guess there was junk up there already.
Yet NASA lost everything. Darn.
Nope. All of the data from Apollo remains available today, much of it in public archives. Darn.
Someone didn't do his research. Did he?
They “lost” the funding dummy 🤡
@@HeetXS
Check out the shadows on these photos from artificial light.
AS11-40-5903
AS14-68-9486
AS16-108-17627
AS14-68-9486
@@kitcanyon658 Is that you, Hobbes?
What is the music starting at 48:00?
It's used way too much ,
I love watching comedies on Saturday morning.
@user-ky5dy5hl4d : Spoken like the jealous boy you are. What? Was math that difficult for you, son?
I love reading insubstantial comments from non educated and not very intelligent people who will never achieve anything in their poor life
@user-ky5dy5hl4d Are you a bit limited in your intelligence?
@user-ky5dy5hl4d a you a little bit depressed because you will never achieve anything like a masters degree or a Phd in your life?
@user-ky5dy5hl4d are you a little sad because you will never achieve anything like a masters degree or a Phd in your poor life?
BREAKING;))))
we cant go to the moon today .. did they lie and take an oath of secrecy . ΑΩ
We can go to the moon today. All we have to do is spend tens of billions building new spacecraft to get there.
We have proof “they” didn’t lie.
No, they didn't lie back in the 60's and 70's. Real men and women figured it out and put 12 different men on the surface.
If that offends your Gen Z or millennial sensibilities then I suggest you stop spending all your time playing Fortnight and get an education in engineering. It's time to adult up, son.
you mean.. no one has been able to go the moon since. I don't know how they got there.. but getting there has proved that AI and robotics are the way to go today. Machinery is much easier to land and retrieve from both the Moon and Mars... and if there is a failure.. no human lives are lost.
I guess they are impervious to the deadly radiation in the van allenbelt . Must be like super heros.
The radiation levels in the VA belts are low enough that normal humans can travel through them without getting a dangerous dose of radiation. We just can’t orbit in the belts indefinitely.
@@Hobbes746 Logic won't work on these clowns. But nice try. I give you credit.
@@Hobbes746
The Apollo 11 crews were exposed to 1.67 mSv per second as they crossed the Van Allen radiation belt. This amounts to a total exposure of 1.8 Sv in 3 hours of travel through the radiation belt during the mission. Any exposure to 1 Sv or more, however, brings about fatal injuries. The radiation readings for the Apollo 11 astronauts’ skin of 0.18 rad, significantly, did not differ from radiation readings from missions restricted to low earth orbit.
Data clearly proves that the Apollo 11 astronauts were not sufficiently protected against radiation: Neither the spaceship nor the spacesuits contained lead.
Aluminum is ineffective against gamma and neutron rays. The calculated exposure of the Apollo crew was 1.8 Sv, an amount associated with nausea, vomiting, bone marrow changes, and 20% mortality. Surprisingly, no Apollo astronaut showed any ill effects from radiation exposure. These inconsistencies seem to reflect either possible over-estimation or under-reporting of the health hazards summarized in Safe Passage. Furthermore, these medical inconsistencies seem to highlight the surprising observations that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not show any signs of space sickness from microgravity upon their return to Earth.
@@Hobbes746
Cosmic radiation is encountered in and above the radiation belts. The latest data confirms that the harsh radiation can't be tolerated without proper shielding. They didn't have it then, and they still don't have it figured out.
@@aok4418 Why do you post the same comment multiple times? Stop spamming.
Can't go now or in the near future with our advanced technology... couldn't go 55 years ago with primitive technology. Logical.
"Primitive technology..."
55 years ago they were splitting atoms, lanunching 300 ft rockets, and performing human heart transplants. Pretty hard to call that primitive.
@gives_bad_advice can't figure out how to go now, can't go in the foreseeable future. Didn't go 55 years ago.
@@MagicRoosterBluesBand "can't figure out how to go now," Have they tried? If they'd been working on it and burning through cash at the rate they did in the 60s/70s and couldn't make it work, then you'd have a point. But that's not the case. There has been no effort to go whatsoever until recently. What would be the incentive to risk lives and spend all that money? What can a man do on the moon that a robot cannot?
@@gives_bad_advice Constellation program? 0 men on the moon. Artemis program? 0 men on the moon. $350 billion later. NASA is a fraud.
The moon landing was done at area51 fact! I mean landing a tin can on the moon 😂
That’s not a fact, that’s a long-disproven false claim.
Referring to the lunar module as a 'tin can' makes it quite clear that you know nothing about the Apollo program, ergo your opinion is meaningless.
You some sort of Sorehead, or What?
Prove it, A-Hole. Even the Russians, who were listening to all the radio transmissions, congratulated us.
Please provide evidence for your "fact". Thanks.
Fun fact, Wernher von Braun married his 1st cousin. That's definitely not rocket science.