What the Hell Just Happened in the UK? Pounds, Pensions & Panic

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 951

  • @ThePlainBagel
    @ThePlainBagel  2 ปีที่แล้ว +298

    Update: the UK government has reversed its planned tax cuts after widespread criticism, with the PM distancing herself from her Finance Minister.

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Liz Truss is like a child playing dress up and everyone took them seriously.

    • @redmist2195
      @redmist2195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I am making a prediction. You will be visiting the topic of UK economical situation again before this winter is over

    • @priuss6109
      @priuss6109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aluisious them?

    • @joraroar
      @joraroar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have only reversed the income tax cut on people earning over 150k. That is worth £2bn of the £45bn in tax cuts.

    • @tatsuuuuuu
      @tatsuuuuuu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      it's blowing me away how bad their leadership is. they seem all bad, like there's not a single one in the lot that's not incompetent and the generations of PMs that succeeded each other can't seem to do anything without it *immediately* blowing up in their face. it's both hilarious and sad.

  • @Jos_Louis
    @Jos_Louis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +979

    Richard, just because many North Americans don't care about what goes on in the UK, please don't take that to mean that you should stop covering this stuff. This was the first good summary I got of the issues that have happened there, so thank you for the coverage (also thank you for your video on Sri Lanka's woes).

    • @tomjwhite
      @tomjwhite 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Seconding this. I'm sure a great deal of the Plain Bagels viewership is outside of the US, and regardless of where one lives these kinds of situations have a ripple effect on everything else. Keep up the content like this :)

    • @leebrock4783
      @leebrock4783 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thirding this, for all of the previously stated reasons. Plus, I tend to have an innate affection for the way Canada rolls 🇨🇦.

    • @GupiSin
      @GupiSin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@julm7744 The education system in your country must be really bad oh my.

    • @leebrock4783
      @leebrock4783 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@julm7744 You're probably trolling, but in case you aren't, the US had a war with Britain to become independent from them, about 250 years ago. . . I guess we "won". After that (and before that, if you remember Columbus and the rest of those "explorers") we proceeded to wipe out many of the native peoples (they were here long before Britain, Spain, etc., or that asshole Columbus guy). Hawaii had it's own thing going on, and in the 1950's I think, they became a state. Not sure if it was their choice or not, maybe Google it? So no, England, Great Britain, or whatever you wanna call it, isn't and has never been under the control of the United States.

    • @leebrock4783
      @leebrock4783 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julm7744 Also, Canada is not a place "inhabited by Americans who don't want to be called Americans". Canada is a place inhabited by Canadians who are proud to be Canadian. America is a place inhabited by Americans who want to kill their neighbor because Trump. It's a good reason, but we're gonna try not taking that route. I hope. ✌️

  • @gigitrix
    @gigitrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +710

    One factor not mentioned is the method by which Kwasi and Truss instigated these changes without working with the Office of Budget Responsibility (usually the nerds in charge of making sure the maths is right, to oversimplify). They actively rejected working with this department. The market's violent reaction could be said to have been exacerbated by the fact that it appears the actions were not motivated by a sound model for the economy, but instead an ideological "shock doctrine" style one that leaves room for great uncertainty.

    • @Tential1
      @Tential1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The market reaction is basic as f...
      Bonds have duration, a market term for sensitivity to interest rates. The central bank is raising rates she's raising spending, gtfo because rates are hjgher
      A 1% move in rates on a 30 year is a 20-30% bond price movement. This isn't a large move. It's literally over 1%. Wait for the other 2-4% to. Kick in as they further raise rates. The pensions got the appreciation on the lowering of rates side. Now. You take the losses going the other way, or you sell, further pressuring rates.

    • @Tential1
      @Tential1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      At the end of the day, they can only prop the market up so long. There are no buyers because 3-4% isn't enough to justify the risk now, and 5% means another 20% drop in bond values. Not good. But it has to happen. Truth is, lots of people who thought they were retiring aren't.

    • @immers2410
      @immers2410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Tential1 I didn’t understand a word of what you written. is that good or bad?

    • @notting2640
      @notting2640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Classic case of what happens when you give absolute control of a country‘s economy to liberal ideologues

    • @johnconlon2207
      @johnconlon2207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@immers2410 Bonds are long term. Its like you are on a train, relaxed, driving though some beautiful svemery. Little risk, no anxiety. Suddenly the train dramatically speeds up just as some steep precipices appear either side. You realise the driver is on crack. You cant get off at a stop. Its miles away. So you pull the emergency stop i.e sell. To get back on that train you will need either a new driver or some heavy incentives i.e higher rates.

  • @JanineJ.Cromwell
    @JanineJ.Cromwell 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +597

    My wife and I are directors of our farm business and own property, plus small pensions. I am nearly 55, my wife is 52.
    We have started to save to retire from the farm, and possibly live on rental income, I'd really appreciate you go LIVE and talk about how to earn passive income online and retire comfortably, let’s say $1M.

    • @BeverleeR.Ziegler
      @BeverleeR.Ziegler 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i do not really know a lot about the market, but based on what little understanding I do have of supply and demand in the economy, now is the best time to enter the market. The only thing preventing me, however, are the steady price fluctuations, which shouldn't be a problem. However, I really need an advisor, can yours help?

    • @LenaSchweizer-ff8xy
      @LenaSchweizer-ff8xy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm grateful for this advice. Finding your coach wasn't too hard. I researched her well before arranging to speak with her on the phone. Considering her resume, she appears competent.

  • @davJames8
    @davJames8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    As someone who lives in the U.K. I think it is worth mentioning this is the first time the Bank of England has ever had to rescue the U.K. economy from the U.K. government

  • @dr.carrot756
    @dr.carrot756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    I am a portfolio manager for pension funds and I was at the centre of all this chaos...the gilt market was basically in freefall for 3 consecutive days and we were selling everything we could to meet collateral calls... if BOE hadn't stepped in, couple of the large funds (multi-billion in size) would have been insolvent by Wed market close, and I would be posting this as an unemployed man...Like your video as always!

    • @leswhynin913
      @leswhynin913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Will it continue next week?

    • @dr.carrot756
      @dr.carrot756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@leswhynin913 I think BOE only bought us time (to reduce leverage and prepare enough liquid assets), they now need to hike even more (thanks to the inflationary mini budget), and still have to unwind the massive balance sheet they accumulated throughout the years...so I am not optimistic...

    • @blueguy5588
      @blueguy5588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@julm7744 If the interest rates can't get close to inflation, the markets will not move back into bonds. It is better to assume some risk than lock in a loss with inflation.

    • @dr.carrot756
      @dr.carrot756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @First name Last name and let millions of people lose their pension?

    • @chesshooligan1282
      @chesshooligan1282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@dr.carrot756 When people make bad investment decisions, it's not my responsibility to bail them out.

  • @echo2370
    @echo2370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Uk east midlands. Tinned semolina & tinned tapioca 2 months ago 85p, today £1.65, all tinned goods up a minimum of 25%, 2nd hand cars still inflated prices, bought 4 Zippo hand warmers for family presents, 2 at the old price of £27 and 2 at the new price of £34. New energy price rises today, good news is that I learnt to play "peaceful easy feeling" on guitar, and "moon river" on harmonica.

  • @MrCandyassroodypoo
    @MrCandyassroodypoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    Nice video, but didn't touch on an important point - The bank of England may be forced to raise interest rates further to combat inflation caused by the stimulus. Vast amounts of people have variable rate mortgages. They are used to a bank of England base rate of

    • @M.-.D
      @M.-.D 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      It almost seems intentional.

    • @anivicuno9473
      @anivicuno9473 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Will they though? Because America raised rates to try and force workforce participation (JP said so himself).
      Some other countries have kept up to keep their currencies from devaluing too far against the dollar.
      None of the (measured) inflation going on is really caused by stimulus. Rather, the rise in food and consumer good is due to the rise in shipping costs (resulting in higher fertilizer, and also food prices) and corporate gouging.

    • @6g8j9k
      @6g8j9k 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      housing market fall = huge demand will be eliminated = no more inflation , housing crash is not the bad thing. they need to accept that

    • @lilsabin
      @lilsabin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@M.-.D exactly… That is what I am thinking… Those guys have too much high education to make such a rookie mistake , i think they did it on purpose to increase the interest rate to the moon. They needed an EXCUSE 🙂

    • @harveyhennessey7402
      @harveyhennessey7402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tough ti**ies...

  • @The_Giant_Lemon
    @The_Giant_Lemon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    Great video but I think you missed the sheer stupidity of the new PM and chancellor. They purposefully avoided the Office for Budget Responsibility giving financial projections and then lied about why the OBR didn't give a projection (ministers came out saying they couldn't get it ready in time - an MP has shown that this is simply a load of bollocks and the OBR were blocked from releasing a statement)

    • @exantiuse497
      @exantiuse497 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not stupidity, just callousness. They wanted pound to crash because they wanted to make money betting against it on the futures market. This is going to hapen over and over again while these people are in power, they purposefully make decisions and statements that hurt the economy and currency of the UK so that they get win big betting against it in the market
      Say what you will about Johnson, he was nothing compared to the current government. Johnson made mistakes, sure, but these people are full-on ruthless psychopaths

    • @XIIchiron78
      @XIIchiron78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      The OBR probably had some particularly choice words to say about them and their plan, so it's no surprise they decided to gag them.

    • @thomas.02
      @thomas.02 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sri Lanka might’ve had corruption, but this time the UK has one-upped them with blithering, blundering incompetence

    • @TiredBush
      @TiredBush 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I mean, all that political campaign funding has to be returned to their investors somehow, eh?

    • @14loosecannon
      @14loosecannon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should also be noted that this clusterfuck is just the start, and will be the prelude to massive cuts to public finances. It's trickle-down Reganomics on steroids, but without any of the resources of the USA!

  • @The_Red_Scare
    @The_Red_Scare 2 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    It might not be America, but that doesn't mean it doesn't matter much. I'm genuinely very concerned for the UK now that I know some of what's going on and honestly I was in shock to hear things had gotten this bad. Please, keep making videos like these.

    • @charleswhitney3235
      @charleswhitney3235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The government needed a wake up call and it has had it. British conservatives have been deluded since Brexit. At some point reality had to show them up and that moment is now. The party's polling is awful and will not recover as they have betrayed their core base, middle class homeowners, only leaving the racists.

    • @hypothalapotamus5293
      @hypothalapotamus5293 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I personally hope that this is a warning to voters in America not to put know nothing idiots who want to be Ronald Reagan or Margarette Thatcher in charge of their country.

    • @jackpot7898
      @jackpot7898 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should be in all fairness. Pound is tanked for budget reason of course but more because of socialist zombies labour taking 33 points lead.

    • @MrWhangdoodles
      @MrWhangdoodles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Tbh, I haven't cared much about the Brits since 2016, once they decided to diminish themselves. I wouldn't be surprised if they're as significant as Spain on the world stage in 20 years.
      A former great power and now...well, debt ridden and greatly weakened. Those poor citizens.

    • @w.d.5016
      @w.d.5016 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This American cares. We live in times of deep economic integration. And even if it doesn’t affect us, we should still care because any economic crisis will induce hardship on people. Not to mention, a learning lesson as well.

  • @chunkylover23
    @chunkylover23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Can I just say something off topic here?
    I really appreciate your nonsensationalist delivery and your lack of hyperbolic rhetoric.
    I've been watching some other channels and it's just a breath of fresh air.
    Thank you ❤️

    • @magnolia549
      @magnolia549 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same, it's refreshing and has been something I wanted in media from all areas of interests. I just like listening to people like Richard, Patrick Boyle and even Coffeezilla talk about things.

  • @matthewgent1788
    @matthewgent1788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Hi Richard, I'm from the UK and your video sums it up pretty well. A lot of people in the UK are on what we call "fixed rate" mortgages and when these expire people are going to get hit hard by the increased rates. The general sentiment in the UK is fear and anger at the moment.

    • @VirtualDarKness
      @VirtualDarKness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      To add to this: in UK people get fixed rate mortgages that usually last 2 or 5 years. (So if someone took a fixed 2 years a year ago, next year it's looking bad with the rate potentially jumping from 2 to 8%)

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you explain what a fixed rate mortgage means in the UK? It sounds to me more like an adjustable rate. I'm from the US.

    • @VirtualDarKness
      @VirtualDarKness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrSupernova111 you can have the rate fixed for a given amount of years. After that it goes back to variable unless you fix it again at the new rate (assuming your ltv is less than 95-100%)

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VirtualDarKness . Thank you so much for the response! Cheers!

  • @shortstraw4
    @shortstraw4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Government: stimulates economy into inflation with QE and printing. Also Government: reacts to said inflation with price caps, subsidies, tax cuts and more QE

    • @jbravo300
      @jbravo300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      California and their inflation relief checks 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @anivicuno9473
      @anivicuno9473 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You have to absolutely dented to think that COVID stimulus caused the rise in energy prices in europe, or that inflation is caused by anything other than the currently high global shipping costs.

    • @neo69121
      @neo69121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      absolute shitshow

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We've only seen inflation as a result of lack of production, more than year of stimulus and QE went by without any big inflation

    • @ayoCC
      @ayoCC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tomlxyz inflation is mostly measured by cost of living, that's why food production problems are extremely siginificant, while people having more money does basically nothing, because everyone who is alive already had to pay for food and housing

  • @rentristandelacruz
    @rentristandelacruz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    The UK pound is getting pounded.

    • @tkdevlop
      @tkdevlop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      real *hard*

    • @tkdevlop
      @tkdevlop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      soon 1£ = 1$

    • @quietkiwi7572
      @quietkiwi7572 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @4m4n40
      @4m4n40 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They’re going to Poundland.

    • @matthewhook3375
      @matthewhook3375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha, going to Poundland, and will need 2 worthless pounds to buy anything 😂

  • @robertallan4489
    @robertallan4489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Your explanation is very much appreciated. I for one, an American, am very interested in what is going on in the UK and Europe both economically and politically, and how they intertwine. Unfortunately, our media is very centrist with little in depth reporting of much in the international world. Never, do I hear about Mexico, Central or South America as well. For example, it is interesting that the Mexican peso is proving to be one of the strongest currencies against today's strengthening U.S. dollar, but no one bothers to report nor explain this phenomenon.

    • @Setixir
      @Setixir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      First person to ever call our media centrist lol

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Fellow American here. That's true. But you also need to seek out the news you want to know about. I find that the American media does report on a lot of international news but you have to go to their website and read the articles. Complimenting American news media with other sources is a great idea though.

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@beckyweisfeld6977 . Sky news and France24 are also great.

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The US media is not "centrist." Centered between what, a business party that likes guns and hates abortions and a business party that hates guns and likes abortions? There is no serious left wing in the USA, because everyone here has bought into the propaganda against socialism.

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@beckyweisfeld6977 The BBC is also pretty shitty news. It's just MSNBC with an extra 3 minute spot about how dumb and poor Africa is. AJ is as you say a decent viewpoint that will cover some things Western media prefers avoiding.

  • @michaelswami
    @michaelswami 2 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    Funding fixed obligations with leverage, who woulda figured anything could go wrong.

    • @dr.carrot756
      @dr.carrot756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The thing is pensions use leverage because they have to, suppose you have £100 liabilities but the employer only gave you £50, to match the liabilities you have to use leverage. Also the risk management has no issue, usually they hold enough cash to sustain a 1 in 20yr event, but last week was 4 consecutive days of 1 in 20yr event, how could anyone be prepared for that. Unless employers are willing to give you the £100, there will always be risk with leverage.

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dr.carrot756 using leverage on a (supposedly) safe asset doesn't sound that stupid

    • @michaelswami
      @michaelswami 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@tomlxyz That’s what Lehman thought.

    • @jomigregory7253
      @jomigregory7253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dr.carrot756 but interest rate on the rise meaning those govt bonds that pension fund hold will generate more cash flow, right ?
      So in essence, the pension funds use these derivatives as a hedge to balance the (then)low yield govt bonds needed another backing?

    • @doodlebug1820
      @doodlebug1820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@dr.carrot756 "how could anyone be prepared" -> it was a deliberate choice to not be prepared. the employer could fully fund the pension but instead they choose to give the profits to management as bonuses and investors as returns.

  • @Dakka9007
    @Dakka9007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I live in the UK and I cant for the life of me understand this government's course of actions. They seemed to have calmed the energy crisis, annual bills will be typically double then previous years but no where near the expected bills before action was taken. However now mortgage rates are increasing rapidly so that may cancel out any benefit that the energy price cap will make. Great video mate, I wish the media would explain things like you. Cheers

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Good. Mortgages have been so cheap that stupid people have been getting them when they couldn't afford a minuscule interest increase. Most of those people shouldn't be living in the size of properties they are, and/or in the parts of town they are. Everyone needs a forced reality check to adjust themselves to the reality of their affordability and prospects. The market has been flattering people's egos and solipsism for far too long.

    • @ankhlee6283
      @ankhlee6283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, eventually the house will be yours and you won't have to pay mortgage anymore. The energy you spent is gone. I guess it's better to say that it's better to pay more in a investment on your patrimony than paying for something that you will never own.

    • @gigitrix
      @gigitrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@ankhlee6283 but the overpaying is on interest - you aren't paying down on the principal or in any way making progress towards a greater share of ownership.

    • @XIIchiron78
      @XIIchiron78 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It helps to understand that the musical chairs of scapegoat prime ministers really only exists as a distraction while the wealthy establishment loots and pillages the economy.
      Or in other words, you're confused because you don't realize who the government _actually_ works for.
      Switching to a functioning voting system instead of FPTP would basically fix this.

    • @arthurduncan5838
      @arthurduncan5838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      System is crashing. They just setting themselves up for System 2.0. We all rent and have to work the crap jobs.

  • @MountainFinance
    @MountainFinance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I always appreciate your non-cluttered viewpoint 🙂

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Mountain, how are you feeling today

    • @MountainFinance
      @MountainFinance ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Johnson-iz8yi Not too bad, how are you?

  • @vassinarain
    @vassinarain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Student in London here, prices have risen so much I have become a ‘part-time vegetarian’. And that’s while having a bills included rental contract that for now has shielded me from insane energy prices.

  • @gustavobuquera
    @gustavobuquera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    Europe getting a taste of South American-like politicians lol

    • @AnglosArentHuman
      @AnglosArentHuman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Give them a couple years and they'll have a lower GDP per capita than Ecuador lmao

    • @Pope_Balenciaga
      @Pope_Balenciaga 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      South America? Sounds like Erduon-lite

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Gustavo, how was your day today

  • @cooper8t
    @cooper8t 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So from someone who lives in the UK. You need to understand Lizz Truss was elected as prime minister from her party members (who are mostly the most hard-core, richest 1% of the country), which represents less than 1% of the UK population. They elected her because they wanted a sizeable tax cut (which the other candidate [former chancellor] said no to). It's also worth noting the current Prime Minister has less than 1/3 of her MP's backing her, (most of them supported the other candidate, the former chancellor).
    Now it's gone to hell. The plan hasn't worked, Brexit didn't work and the entire country is hanging on by a thread on the hopes that cooler heads will prevail.
    The other issue is the Government has unlimited downside from gas prices this winter (and yes the UK is cold and miserable in the winter). Instead of partially funding this downside with taxes on energy companies, they've decided to just borrow money to fill in the gap (yes that's risky, hence the markets reaction).
    Housing represents around 50% of UK wealth (most of which is leveraged via mortgages), interest rates are now going way higher than expected, don't need to explain why this is a problem. Conservative/Tory support from the UK public has dropped off the edge off a cliff since the announcement nationwide too.
    Basically, we're fucked unless a U turn happens soon, which if Lizz Truss does, will probably cause a no confidence vote and a snap election (so the Government will probably double down), meaning we're probably going to carry on.
    To the international markets: Punish our Government. They're useless.

  • @nickcowen4565
    @nickcowen4565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m from the uk I’m 22 I wasn’t old enough to vote in the brexit referendum but if I was I think I and a lot of other young people would vote remain. Since this point British politics has been on a downward spiral of incompetent conservative leaders handing off to one another against essentially no opposition. There has been no stability from any leadership bar Boris Johnson who as the bafoon he has always been tripped over his own laces. This all started from a hugely under qualified and incompetent Tory leader in David Cameron, and has been cemented by ever other Tory leader that followed, the fact that the country still see this party as the best option speaks volumes about the opposition

    • @superguyx5468
      @superguyx5468 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, I would have voted leave

  • @livephysiology
    @livephysiology 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    Perhaps there is a concept similar to 2008 of "too big to fail" with the British pound and other aspects of the British economy. It could be that some investors didn't think these problems could become as severe as they are in an economy like Britain's.

    • @kalui96
      @kalui96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      my Occum's Razor take on this is they thought they'll get bailed out by US and EU. so yeah! You might be right...

    • @lusvus5445
      @lusvus5445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When too big to fall face inflation 20%, question would be how far to fall

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kalui96 No one is going to bail out the Brits from a self inflicted problem after they go to all the trouble of telling the EU to piss off in the first place. The USA bailing them out? LOL, the USA won't even bail out millions of Americans living in poverty, we couldn't give two shits about the Brits.

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @First name Last name Every capitalist economy faces massive inflation and busts on the regular, and government capture by industry and the wealthy is a feature of capitalism, not a bug.
      It's almost like dedicating society to the private accumulation of wealth is a misguided goal.

  • @Jedermeister
    @Jedermeister 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    UK Gent here. I can tell you its bad in Britain. A lot of people are scared as our energy bills are still going to be climbing, the 'freeze' at £2500 is for average households and I am a frugal person but those averages are always wrong for me (same for friends and family). The NHS is stressed to breaking and there is growing, real concern they are going to try and privatize it . The inflation is making buying food difficult (an understatement) and our benefits system for people disabled, unable to find work or just not earning enough is being neglected while more and more people have to sign on for wage top up. Oh and lets not forget about fuel which, yes has come down but still runs at £1.60 per litre (about $8 per gallon) and we have very little public transport outside of the major cities so cars are the only way around. The anger at how we are being taken as fools and how powerless we are as a populace to stop them is coursing through everybody I meet. The rich and bankers are once again laughing as the rest of us starve, can't work and prepare to freeze either in the home or out of the street as we fail to mean our mortgage payments.
    I have shame in admitting I voted for the conservative MP in my area. I am however bolstered that they think this whole thing is madness too but regardless, I'll be looking at other candidates from other parties for my next vote.
    Just a note to anyone that reads this that doesn't quite understand the UK voting etc. its tricky; essentially we don't vote for the leader, we vote for our local area representative and they party they represent. The party with the most representatives across the country wins.

    • @gerardacronin334
      @gerardacronin334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      In Canada we also vote for our local MPs. We don’t vote for the party leader.

    • @jamesodell3064
      @jamesodell3064 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Here is the US our system is even more convoluted. We vote for electors at the state level who then vote for the president. That is why we got Trump instead of Hillary Clinton. She got about 3 million more votes then Trump, but lost the election. A majority of Americans voted against Trump and we got stuck with Trump for four years because of the electoral college.

    • @AnglosArentHuman
      @AnglosArentHuman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Your vote for the Legislative being directly tied to your "vote" in the Executive is an awful concept, honestly.
      Last election (Argentina) I voted one party for the executive (both national and local), a second party for Congress (national) and a third party for the Legislature (local). The three parties are similar in their broad views but have completely different priorities, being able to choose which policies/model is more relevant to me in each level and branch is great.

    • @markeasley6149
      @markeasley6149 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamesodell3064 4 years that were very good for the US and the world until the pandemic. The founders knew what was up and it will be proven again.

    • @anti-ethniccleansing465
      @anti-ethniccleansing465 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamesodell3064
      Lol, an ^ ai persona complaining about our US Constitution yet again. What a shocker. The electoral college has been with us for good reason since our founding, and the folks on the left are angry that extremely populated and always very leftist LA, SF, and NYC don’t get to decide who’s president of the whole country, never allowing the conservative heartland to have a say as to who runs the white house. The electoral college is extremely important for a variety of reasons.
      It’s no surprise to see when nations don’t have such a system, entire regions will get neglected, ignored, and underfunded - as we’ve seen happen in Australia.

  • @Joemckenzie123
    @Joemckenzie123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Boris Johnson actually somehow survived the whole Party-gate saga. His undoing was putting someone accused of sexual misconduct in a position of authority within the Conservative party. That triggered a big part of his cabinet to resign, including his chancellor, Rishi Sunak. Rishi then ran for leader against Truss, and warned about how dangerous he policies were, but the members of the Conservative party wouldn't vote for him because a lot of them liked Boris and Rishi was the knife-wielder, so to speak, who killed the premiership. Our whole country is a mess right now.

    • @curtgomes
      @curtgomes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Join the club... we have Dementia Joe to deal with!

    • @markeasley6149
      @markeasley6149 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      UK seemed too aggressive on the lockdowns which did not help. Party gate was a big nothingburger. I won't defend the conservatives, who seem weak as a party and can't close ranks to move an agenda forward.

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello 👋
      Joseph, how was your day today

  • @Steve-GM0HUU
    @Steve-GM0HUU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for this. I found this a better explanation than I have heard any UK journalists on our news provide so far.

    • @Ghengiskhansmum
      @Ghengiskhansmum 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We don't have any journalists in the UK MSM just a load of well trained overpaid parrot's.

  • @nonono6949
    @nonono6949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you Plain Bagel, was also wondering why the pound hit record low despite the fiscal stimuli. Please keep covering issues like this in the future!

  • @jordanwilliams24
    @jordanwilliams24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    most thorough and understandable coverage of this I've seen so far - thank you!

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Jordan, how are you feeling today

  • @phillupson8561
    @phillupson8561 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    UK citizen here and tres unimpressed. I'm not a finance person, just show a general interest but I can't work out how the energy subsidy is meant to help, seems to be a supply issue and pricing is how we fix that (as cold as I'll be, facts are facts) but now we can't calculate our costs due to this intervention, effectively decoupling our economy from reality. Then obviously we have the mini budget fighting the BoE trying to curb inflation (yes causes are global and we have limited impact, but everything is a nail when you only have a hammer) so I'm utterly perplexed.

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's not a general supply issue. The energy companies have raised their prices to match the market because it's a free market. It's faster to subsidize right now rather than take the long and complicated legal proceedings to force the companies to change this and that could set presidents that affect broader markets and international confidence in investing in a country. There is only a supply issue from Russia which is a relatively small part of British energy supply. but because that has forced global energy prices to rise on the wholesale market, other sources have increased their prices even though their supplies aren't affected and have in fact been increased to meet the difference. It's the downside to very free markets and takes a while to address the foundations (like nationalisation, which has other geo-legal impacts). Your pensions are invested in these energy companies that have raised prices to meet demand, if they are forced to reduce their prices everyone invested in them would suffer - your pensions. So your pensions would lose even more money than has happened so far. And listed companies have a legal/regulatory/moral obligation to make profits for their shareholders when possible. There are measures that could be taken but those are draconian laws that come onto play during national emergencies and wars etc.

  • @nickpll
    @nickpll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As a UK citizen, it feels like the Bank of England's actions here are reiterating that if you are a big organisation then they will protect you from your own bad decisions even at the expense of the general population (by restarting QE)

    • @nickpll
      @nickpll ปีที่แล้ว

      @Matthew LVK pension companies were failing because of their own investment decisions. They relied on the government not creating substantial changes to the bond market (which is a pretty silly thing to rely on). While the government actions did lead to the chaos, it's not fair to hold the government responsible for the investment decisions of financial organisations.
      And yes there are consequences if the bank of England lets these companies fail so I agree with your point. But there are also consequences to continually bailing them out. It allows them to basically do whatever the hell they want as they then don't have to worry about the consequences of their actions since the BoE bails them out anyway.

  • @callumforrest
    @callumforrest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a supporter from the UK, I really appreciate this piece of content

  • @Hrafnskald
    @Hrafnskald 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Good explanation. I had been watching this through British media sources, and none of them explained the pension liquidity side of this nearly as well as you have.

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello 👋
      Ed Hrafnskald, how was your day today

  • @leoberg7920
    @leoberg7920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You were born to do this. Great explanation and presentation.

  • @cedoniapeterson9239
    @cedoniapeterson9239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So excited to watch this! I’m an American living in the UK and have been trying to find a good explanation.

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello 👋
      Cedonia, how was your day today

  • @sheldonpetrie3706
    @sheldonpetrie3706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    I wonder if next week will be a video on Credit Suisse 🤔

    • @kalui96
      @kalui96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They'd try to have Bagel suicided if they were exposed like that
      juuuust kiddingg

    • @gabrielavila2884
      @gabrielavila2884 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would you say that? Quantitative tightening just started at the start of this year. Credit Suisse can't be seriously going down again.

    • @warmonkey96
      @warmonkey96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Only once cramer tells you that CS is fine and is likely to be taken over. 😂

    • @markomak1
      @markomak1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What happened with Credit Suisse?

  • @inquaanate2393
    @inquaanate2393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you bought £150 bn of offshore wind it could power the uk about 3 times over.
    The uk uses ~40Gw and wind power costs about £1 per watt for an installation that will last 25 years.
    The price cap policy is crazy.

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but wind power is somewhat unstable, and maintaining offshore facilities is obviously not ideal (we already do it for oil rigs though, so I imagine the maintenance would be feasible at scale). I think a mixture of wind, hydro (for boosting the supply when the output from the wind drops, as hydro throughput can be controlled easily) and nuclear power (for longer term changes in wind output, e.g. seasonal shifts) would be ideal.

  • @XIIchiron78
    @XIIchiron78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    14:20 there is also the fact that the implicit guarantee of solvency by the government allows these large institutions to engage in riskier behavior - essentially privatizing their profits and socializing their losses. Not great for the long term, and rather anticompetitive given that smaller firms can't compete with that guarantee.

    • @curtgomes
      @curtgomes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We're seeing a repeat of 2008 in many ways; kicking the can down the road. You can thank MMT for this insane instability.....

    • @seabreeze4559
      @seabreeze4559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      corporatism

    • @curtgomes
      @curtgomes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seabreeze4559 socialism...........

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ ปีที่แล้ว

      @@curtgomes Corporatism is MMT. It is literally the economic theory central to Fascist ideology. It is also a large part of why Mussolini saw the US as being so similar to Italy (minus the elections, which he saw as naïve). However, Fascism is itself some derivative of socialism, in the sense that its proponents and chief thinkers were once socialists.

  • @hiteshprajapati5275
    @hiteshprajapati5275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am from UK, a big fan of your channel. You simply explains complicated concepts like Bonds. Keep it up and pls cover UK time to time.

  • @JavaMuko
    @JavaMuko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    The removal of the tax bracket for high income definitely makes no sense... The changes in income tax barely/don't affect the groups that need help. Very sad. I consider myself lucky to be in a financially reasonable position

    • @anthonybyrne2262
      @anthonybyrne2262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Truss wanted to go full reaganomics. They said the tax cuts for the rich would trickle down to the poor HAHAHA

    • @exantiuse497
      @exantiuse497 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's typical trickle down economics (also know as voodoo economics, a term coined by George Bush Sr.). The idea is that if you give the richest people in the society more money it boosts growth and everyone benefits.
      In reality it doesn't actually work that way, of course. When a poor person gets an extra dollar he uses it. When a rich person gets a dollar he saves it. This is self-evident, yet people still continue pretending as if trickle down actually worked

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It just gives the lower-end richer people nearer the tax cut-off point more chances to save or pay off their household debts. They are just going to save, not spend. The other tax cuts aren't enough to let those less well off to do the same. They should have kept the 45%, perhaps raise the salary threshold a bit but raise the thresholds for everyone too.

    • @ekaterinastaneva9922
      @ekaterinastaneva9922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@anthonybyrne2262 this does work in some cases for example high level of unemployment - you want businesses to grow, thrive, multiply so they create jobs. UK unemployment rate at the minute is quite low, so there is no point of tax cut for the high earners.

    • @AnglosArentHuman
      @AnglosArentHuman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@ekaterinastaneva9922 Trickle down economics works only sometimes in theory and very rarely in practice. More often than not the money gets pocketed, nothing changes and the govt bleeds cash.

  • @aristotlechange1424
    @aristotlechange1424 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The maximum weekly state pension is £141 in the UK, £507 in Germany, £304 in France, and £513 in Spain.

  • @tenaciousdean6179
    @tenaciousdean6179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    As someone in the UK: I'm very glad I shifted around my pension before the funds started to get margin called. About 15% was in these gilts by default, even though I'm only 26. I've now gone 85% ex-UK and very glad to have done so. Did something similar a year or two ago with my other pension as well.
    In terms of the political situation, there have been some 'enough is enough' protests today across the country. Nothing major, but definitely a sign of what's to come. When interest rates eventually go up and people's mortgages get more expensive, I think we are going to see a lot of angry protests, maybe even riots. General election is due in 2 years but can imagine another one being called much sooner than that. Truss aint going to last long.

    • @Theferg1
      @Theferg1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s Fuc$ up!! We the people need to take our rights back and do away with these governments and the way that they fucking spend and causing us to lose our homes and peoples lives are lost damn people come on let’s take this thing back over!!💯👍

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As an American I have a couple of questions. Does your pension allow you to choose investments? Also, do you know what the typical asset allocation for UK pensions look like? Pensions in the US usually have a guaranteed fixed income during retirement so I don't see how making asset allocation choices make any difference to the retiree. Also, I believe most US pensions are funded by PE but I could be wrong on that. Do the majority of mortgages in the UK have adjustable rates? In the US most mortgages have fixed rates. Thanks!

    • @tenaciousdean6179
      @tenaciousdean6179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MrSupernova111 We used to have defined benefit (final salary) pensions, however they've mostly gone the way of the dodo unless you work in the public sector (teaching, armed forces, civil service etc) and even there I believe it's mostly being phased out. The vast majority of people are now on what they call a Defined Contribution pension, which I believe employers have to offer by law and enroll you automatically after 3 months of employment.
      These vary massively in quality. For example, with my pension at my small employer, I sacrifice about 2% of my income, and they give me something like 3% back, so in effect I get 5% of my earnings in a pension each month. My wife's employer (a big bank) are able to offer a 10% pension which she doesn't even need to contribute to. I've seen civil servants have 18% pensions advertised as well.
      This contributed money then goes into your "pension pot", which is what you'll use to live off at retirement. If you get stuck with a shitty pension like mine forever and don't actively invest in other ways, that means you'll never retire because it simply wouldn't be enough to live off. Because people also don't know a lick about investing, unless they're in property there's probably a 70-80% chance they don't know that their pension has barely even kept up with inflation. I believe many people are going to come to this realisation over the next 30 years and younger people like me are getting much more clued up than our parents.
      Nevertheless, you can largely do with your pension pot as you please, within limits. Your provider will have certain asset managers that you can choose to invest with (including themselves), or you can leave it as default. The vast majority of people never touch their pension.
      The problem with this is that someone in their 20s (like me), ends up being invested in shit that is completely inappropriate for their age and risk appetite. For example, about 15% of my pension was in gilts/bonds until I changed it manually recently. As mentioned earlier, most people will not know to do this though and will be unknowingly significantly invested in bonds and the UK market.

    • @tenaciousdean6179
      @tenaciousdean6179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MrSupernova111 In terms of mortgages - we do not have 30 year fixed rates like I believe you guys do over there. The most you can get is about 5 years at a fixed rate from what I know, and the rest of it will be variable, dependent on the interest rates set by the BoE. If you don't remortgage once you're fixed rate has ended, you're at the whim of the interest rates. Why anyone would stay on a variable rate is beyond me, but I believe a significant amount of people stay on them for long periods of time for one reason or another.

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tenaciousdean6179 . Your responses were incredibly insightful! In the US when we talk about pensions we primarily talk about define benefit plans and this was part of my confusion. You're correct that in the US 30 year fix rate mortgages are the norm. Thank you so much for your insightful responses! Cheers!

  • @gamificationoflife
    @gamificationoflife 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Australian here, we’re a very Lowkey country in terms of the entire economy at the moment, all the focus is on America, UK, Europe, Russia, China, Japan & somewhat India. I’m very appreciative of videos like this since most finance channels are based in the US so they only usually cover US topics, but this type of info on other countries are extremely important. I only know 1 person in my entire acquaintance group that is even remotely aware of what’s going on in the global economy, perhaps ignorance is bliss? Regardless, please keep covering these topics Richard

  • @kobusstander324
    @kobusstander324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent video. Thanks for explaining situation to someone from outside UK.

  • @aishwaryapotdar1348
    @aishwaryapotdar1348 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really concise and perfect, thank you for this, I finally got it.

  • @kegal
    @kegal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    While its crystal ball territory to say this. I think Sunak was the better choice for cooling off the market, he did talk big on not kicking the debt burden down the road. While Truss did say she would stimulate the economy if elected. We are no reaping the 'reward' of that

    • @bosshog36
      @bosshog36 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sunak said this would happen if Dizzy Lizzy went ahead with the mini budget

  • @Chris-lr2qb
    @Chris-lr2qb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Small correction: Boris wasn't ousted because of Partygate. He was ousted because he promoted a minister to higher positions in government despite knowing of sexual misconduct claims against said minister, and then lied about it and - perhaps more pertinently - sent his MPs out to spread the lie for him without their knowledge.

    • @kegal
      @kegal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It was more of a combination of those actions really

    • @honorkemp
      @honorkemp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i bet he is glad its coming down on someone else

    • @Chris-lr2qb
      @Chris-lr2qb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kegal It wasn't though. The public and some MPs were outraged by Partygate, but he survived a vote of no confidence by his own MPs on that matter. He had jumped from scandal to scandal through his entire term in office, with Partygate being just the biggest, but he survived all of them. It was the fact that he made his MPs and ministers look bad on TV by lying to them and having them lie for him that prompted them to oust him.

    • @kegal
      @kegal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Chris-lr2qb agree to disagree

    • @raggedcritical
      @raggedcritical 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He'd been a dead man walking for nearly a year with the scandals and U-turns piling up but the Tories unwilling to turf him because they don't have anyone to replace him with. They still didn't have anyone to replace him with in August but they had to turf him anyway when it was clear his scandals were causing reputational long-term damage to the wider Tory party.
      Unfortunately they still didn't have anyone to replace him who would be an electoral asset like he was, so the next PM was going to be weaker and more beholden to the ERG, who are an extreme right-wing faction of an already very right-wing party, but even worse had minimal loyalty to the party and were perfectly willing to blow it up to get their way. Liz Truss was more willing to court the ERG and be their pawn so she was voted into the final round of voting with Rishi Sunak, a man with many problems of his own but most damningly a very un-Prime Ministerial skin tone, so Truss was voted PM by the wider Tory party. She then started implementing the ERG's policies - which you could describe as trickle-down only without even the suggestion that any money was going to find its way to anyone not already obscenely wealthy (trickle-up?) - and the pound crashed.

  • @justcommenting4981
    @justcommenting4981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Inflation strikes me more and more as a very course measure of economic health. Because the real problem with inflation is usually unequal inflation. In this instance energy prices. I think it's so popular to use because targeted inflation reduction actually requires public policy(politics) to stabilize prices as opposed to just giving the power to banks to effectively make investment decisions for private interests as opposed to public good. Nice relatively straight forward explanation.

  • @ekaterinastaneva9922
    @ekaterinastaneva9922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Not a super crucial point, but I will still make it - the winter bills help package could have been way more effective. There is no point to give a flat 400 pounds per household disregarding their disposable income. Mang households who need more will not get it and many households who can afford it will just get some free money they will put into savings

    • @treyshaffer
      @treyshaffer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Placing a price cap on heating bills is honestly one of the worst solutions I've ever heard to any problem facing a country. It simultaneously increases supply pressures while subsidizing wealthy households who don't need financial support. Only a complete idiot would propose it. So glad I don't live in the UK. The conservative party seems hell bent on tying to a noose on the country's economy.

    • @ekaterinastaneva9922
      @ekaterinastaneva9922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@treyshaffer one thing I didn't get is that will happen to the rest of the heating bills. If the real bill is 3.5k but the price cap is 2.5k, is the government going to subsidise the remaining thousand pound? And if yes then it should definitely be introduced, like the relief package, for the vulnerable part of the population only.

  • @hunter99225
    @hunter99225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Central banks be like: "I've come here to cut rates and print money...and I'm all out of rate cuts."

  • @igrowfaster
    @igrowfaster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plain Bagel + Patrick Boyle = my weekly financial news summary.

  • @beaverundercover3479
    @beaverundercover3479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Correction ! "Incentivise people to work" is what was said in parliament. Not growth.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You'd be surprised how many people equate the two

  • @laplacia
    @laplacia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To me it seems like uk pension problem is not resolved, but halted temporarily.

  • @TheMrFishnDucks
    @TheMrFishnDucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love how the free market just did them over it is beyond hilarious. Nice video. Hopefully the pension situation can be sorted quickly and the politicians tarred and feathered.

    • @XzMattyxZ
      @XzMattyxZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Currently the politicians in question are polling at figures suggesting they'll lose the next general election and possibly not even be the main opposition (if two other parties decide to co-op, which I believe the party in question have literally always been in power or in opposition, sadly the election isn't for another 2 years so things may change by then but I do think they'll 100% lose just how badly may change)

    • @chesshooligan1282
      @chesshooligan1282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The free market did them over? This whole thing has been caused by money printing and government spending, which have nothing to do with the free market. All the free market has done is refuse to buy a crap product, like UK government bonds. Blaming the free market for this is like blaming your neighbour for your personal bankruptcy because he refused to buy your 1960s black-and-white telly from you after your gambling holiday in Las Vegas.

  • @kwkw5711
    @kwkw5711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Uk person here. I am disappointed in tax cuts for rich. When we have 40000 nurses per year leaving public service because of low pay and more conditions. 10 years of austerity already in public service. At some point public services will crumble. Does not seem right to be giving more money to rich in this situation.

  • @FJames
    @FJames 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    As someone who lives in the UK, I can definitely say my investments have felt it big time and cash doesn’t go far at the moment…

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just ignore it. Britain is a productive country.

    • @axelnils
      @axelnils 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It all started with Brexit…

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@axelnils sign you don't know what the f*** yer talking about

  • @olliert4840
    @olliert4840 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Mr. Bagel, I'm from the UK and didn't really understand the economics of these new government changes, so this was really helpful.

    • @olliert4840
      @olliert4840 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In terms of my thoughts, I think trying to brute force an increase in demand while there are global supply-side issues is not the best idea, and I can't help think that these changes were more politically rather than economically motivated, given Truss just came into power and wanted to make a statement. As for living costs, energy prices (and fuel) are very bad in the uk at the moment. We had a hot summer so I think we haven't felt the full effect of this yet, it will be a very difficult winter economically especially for some people.

    • @olliert4840
      @olliert4840 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It also feels like there is little economic expertise behind our government's decisions (in general not just now). Surely the government can just hire economists to give some idea of what their planned reforms are going to result in?

  • @ttrjw
    @ttrjw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    FTSE250 - the midcap index - is a better indicator of the UK. It has really taken a pounding.

  • @mrdisco1
    @mrdisco1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Richard your videos are really important and valuable. Would you consider a quick follow up to explain why (or why not) something similar could happen in the US or Canada?

  • @pragmatiste
    @pragmatiste 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    If you want to know how it is to live in turkey: imagine this happening every month for the last 4 years 😅

    • @Elic205
      @Elic205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I'd start only accepting payments in gold and silver and maybe turkish delight. 😛

    • @pragmatiste
      @pragmatiste 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Elic205 yeah it makes sense 🤣. Soom we're gonna have to go back to the times before lydians invented money and trade items instead of a currency 🤣

    • @marmedalmond9958
      @marmedalmond9958 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pragmatiste ill take the goats and shirkels

  • @e.sanoop110
    @e.sanoop110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great vdo. U explained a Lil complex issue in a very simple and understandable way. Pls continue making such vdos on complex financial issues.

  • @crabbycrab9955
    @crabbycrab9955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've invested a lot more in Danish assets. I feel security and stability is a good factor to consider these days. All my Danish stocks are in green for this year. Which can't be said for the rest of my portfolio.

    • @NiftyKnot
      @NiftyKnot 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yolo into lurpak

    • @tommyhansen7600
      @tommyhansen7600 ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel like it has todo with the kind of people there

  • @kukucska1984
    @kukucska1984 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you have viewers from Europe, a lot of them! :D keep it up cause its extremally helpful! Thanks!

  • @YuFanLou
    @YuFanLou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Richard’s worrying dry laugh adds so much flavor to this whole mess 😅

  • @faridlabib4273
    @faridlabib4273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for your in-depth explanation! You covered all bases brilliantly.

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Farid, how was your day today

  • @sam_p792
    @sam_p792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Your explanation on the pension/gilt situation is probably the first that I’ve actually fully understood, thank you! I have watched lots of people explaining it but none have gone into the detail but kept it simple like you did 😂👏🏻

  • @rikkygoh974
    @rikkygoh974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UK used to import 4% of Gas & 9% of oil from Russia. Such fractions could easily be replaced by other suppliers!
    It’s mind boggling to blame all on Putin & Russia for all economic woes & price hikes in the UK

    • @matthewhook3375
      @matthewhook3375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where we buy oil from is completely irrelevant - it’s all purchased through global commodities markets. Russian oil and gas has been removed from the pool, reducing total supply available. Meanwhile demand is unchanged, so the price rises.

  • @rafewatson3313
    @rafewatson3313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    As people mentioned in the comments, this 'mini budget' was blocked from being costed by the Office for budget responsibility (set up in 2012 to independently verify the costing of proposed budgets). This is a core factor why the market is freaking out.
    The government is already looking to cut costs via 'inefficacies' to fund this nonsense and when placed in the context of the strikes this summer by the RMT (rail network union) and other public services, for pay rises in line with inflation among other things, referred to by the media as the 'summer of discontent'.
    As someone in the UK, I'm worried

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You folks are enjoying the result of capitalism after having lost your empire. The only way for the rich to continue buying new yachts is for them to colonize the bank accounts of the lower classes. I'd say that you all should probably stop voting for Tories, but it does turn out that propaganda is some of the most reliable return on the dollar out there.

  • @ChrisBennett-sj5pm
    @ChrisBennett-sj5pm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live in the UK and it is a very strange situation. On one side the most recent GDP figures were not negative, 0.2% growth I think, so we are not in a recession. Where I work, in manufacturing, orders are great for the next year. On the other hand inflation is out of control. The housing market will inevitably crash massively because in the UK we only have short term fixed deals on our mortgages of 2 to 5 years normally before you have to get another deal at the latest rate. With debt levels so much higher than in previous decades the hiking of interest rates is going to kill the housing market but the effect will be delayed as peoples fixed rate deals end. On top of that I cannot understand the government using expansionary fiscal policy in a high interest rate environment. It just seems like lunacy. Unless of course they have access to data which suggests that deflation is quickly becoming the threat which is a possibility.

  • @anth5122
    @anth5122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Printing money
    Raising interest rates
    Cutting taxes … what could go wrong 🤪

  • @KalinduH
    @KalinduH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video as always! Could you please cover the credit suisse situation as well?

  • @jennaharrison1001
    @jennaharrison1001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, the same news, 99% less politics. This is why I subscribe.

  • @duncangans980
    @duncangans980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video as always. Boris Johnson wasn’t really ousted for PartyGate, although that was a factor. It was mainly because of his appointment of Chris Pincher as deputy chief whip.

    • @MJ-uk6lu
      @MJ-uk6lu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He should be in jail for mishandling pandemic and spreading lies about herd immunity, when nothing was known.

    • @GorgeDawes
      @GorgeDawes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He basically thought one of his senior officials being accused of sexually assaulting people was funny.

  • @andresg297
    @andresg297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tax cuts without reducing government spending just makes things worse

  • @robertallan4489
    @robertallan4489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The year has not been crappy! It has been '...very interesting'.

  • @Funtimes670
    @Funtimes670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BOE has indicated that 26% of mortgages in the UK is ARM. With interest rates rising, energy and food cost skyrocketing, they are ripe for a 2008 American style collapse soon. Having your pension is great, but if you are homeless and starving it won’t help much.

  • @mkoschara
    @mkoschara 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great video. Greed is the pandemic.

  • @raulsalanaranjo6565
    @raulsalanaranjo6565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve heard that Credit Suisse and some other major European bank are in big trouble. Are you going to make a video about it?

  • @starmorpheus
    @starmorpheus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Investing in EX-US market looks like a massive L for the coming decade 💀

    • @ericliu8488
      @ericliu8488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Was a massive L for the last decade too 😅

  • @ASidd1
    @ASidd1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, Richard! Appreciate all your work on TH-cam

  • @mrmr9201
    @mrmr9201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm a British international student in the US. One of my parents supports me in GBP the other in Euros. Both currencies have been annihilated this year, making America really expensive. As far as politics are concerned, I usually always support tax cuts but it might not be the time for them.

    • @TheUndulyNoted
      @TheUndulyNoted 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      “I always support tax cuts” what a ridiculous statement.

    • @ZotyLisu
      @ZotyLisu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheUndulyNoted ?? yeah taking money from people is soo good

    • @Hyperpandas
      @Hyperpandas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ZotyLisu Considerimg people require the government to do stuff, yeah, it is.

    • @ZotyLisu
      @ZotyLisu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hyperpandas of course, but governments don't have to be big and involved in everything. I'm not saying it's bad, but not even considering the other option is.. weird

    • @Hyperpandas
      @Hyperpandas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ZotyLisu Isn't someone saying they usually always support tax cuts as silly as someone saying they usually always support tax increases? It's up to a society to decide the role they want government to have in their lives, and then pay accordingly.

  • @JanBruunAndersen
    @JanBruunAndersen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    #3:25 - it doesn't really matter if heating costs are going up with 100, 200, or 500 % or not. What matters is how large a percentage of a person's pay has to be set aside for heating. If heating was 0.00002 % of the cost of living, it would not matter if it rose to 0.00004 or 0.00008 %.

  • @jackc1202
    @jackc1202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Can’t wait to leave the UK

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You've been saying that for years, darling. Get on with it!

  • @JeremyFernando93
    @JeremyFernando93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a Sri Lankan, it breaks my heat to hear Sri Lanka coming up as the worst economic crisis right now. Although I don't live Lanka right now, the political corruption which happened, is happening and will continue to happen in Sri Lanka is an example for whatever economic outcome that's going to come in a couple of years.

  • @Unpronounceable.
    @Unpronounceable. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Even the most secure investments (bonds) can drop by a significant amount

  • @sjelucten7150
    @sjelucten7150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My daughter in the UK is busy trying to sell her properties in London. She doesn't want to have drug addicts occupy the apartments. But it's very difficult to sell at the moment.

  • @AlexaVojackova
    @AlexaVojackova 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very interesting video, Richard! At times maybe a little hard for me to grasp but nonetheless educating. If I may ask could you please make a video about the bad side of price caps? For example the price caps that have been set on energy or fuel prices all around Europe? I think that many people actually forget that their implementation may have a positive impact on their wallets but not so much on the greater economy as everything has it's pros and cons. Thank you

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Alexa, how are you feeling today

  • @metalants2806
    @metalants2806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UK watcher. Tq for your video. Middle income, prices go up = Wife back to work, too much debt though! 2 year left on mortgage fix. Tricky times for us, much harder for many poorer people. Trying to help with food bank donations etc. Good luck to you all the in US.

  • @greatestever8169
    @greatestever8169 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wow this is insane with no cheese on bagel…

  • @itsdhruvilshah
    @itsdhruvilshah 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was a great and easy to understand explanation. I watched much about it and your summary is the simplest to-the-point one. Love learning from you. ❤️❤️

  • @Relaxinghypnoasmr
    @Relaxinghypnoasmr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It seems the whole world is experiencing a leveling of the playing field. True democracy (as opposed to flawed democracies like America) seems to be a good indicator of a country’s preparedness for global economic catastrophe. I’m not sure why that would be true, and correlation isn’t causation, but if you look at the countries faring best in this climate, it’s the first common denominator that comes to mind.

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jessi - give us all an example of a 'true' democracy. There isn't one. Some are more flawed than others but there are no true democracies. If you think there are, then you are naive and brainwashed.

    • @Johnson-iz8yi
      @Johnson-iz8yi ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Jessie, how are you doing today

  • @samalamad774
    @samalamad774 ปีที่แล้ว

    Back in the winter of 2017, I was paying 100 gas and electric a month. Now, I'm paying 400 a month. Council Tax was 110 now it is 160. Diesel is up from 1.20 to 1.80 a litre. It is a nightmare. I wish I just could wake up.

  • @KA-rt6bb
    @KA-rt6bb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It seems like no one on all sides of the aisle wants to follow basic economic principles

    • @RedLeader327
      @RedLeader327 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because basic principles are for basic explanation. Once you realize that economics is far more complicated, especially due to the H factor (Humans), the "basic economics" chant dies.

  • @dr.carrot756
    @dr.carrot756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This might be more relevant to the US than you think, UK pensions hold overseas assets as well, US credit, global equity, etc, when they need cash to meet collateral calls they were selling everything they could. Note that UK pensions hold about £1.5 trillion of assets. If BOE hadn’t stepped in, this may have already triggered a panic sale, spreading to all asset classes and every major markets.

  • @willaxesawian9242
    @willaxesawian9242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    welp, at least the rich got their tax cut /s

    • @midimusicforever
      @midimusicforever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not really. The rich don't pay income tax. This was a tax cut for the upper middle class.

    • @bencooper6859
      @bencooper6859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@midimusicforever not true they also removed the cap on bonus payments, so potentially you could earn 10x your annual income in a bonus in shares that dont get taxed ;)

  • @MichaelBennett000
    @MichaelBennett000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    as a Canadian happily living in the UK I see the Truss' government moves as a parable for Canada. Canada and other democratic nations need to avoid fiscal policy that is simultaneously rooted in "common sense" while remaining oblivious to the mechanisms of reality. While our Canadian government has myriad "out of touch" moments, the leader of our opposition has declared bitcoin a hedge against inflation. What we need is more balanced financial content like plain bagel instilled in our citizenry at a young age lest we end up in a situation where our "common sense uncle from facebook" is creating fiscal policy.

  • @pandreou9382
    @pandreou9382 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video Richard, thanks a lot.

  • @kalui96
    @kalui96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Kinda like Turkey, China, and Sri Lanka
    Maybe if y'all English did the right thing and ate the monarchs and rich things might be better

    • @georgesteffey8375
      @georgesteffey8375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is quite silly that they still have a monarchy at all

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is nothing compared to those matters. It's like comparing the flu to typhoid fever.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@georgesteffey8375 the monarchs are only ceremonial leaders. The Prime Minister is in charge.

    • @kalui96
      @kalui96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samsonsoturian6013 Yes you are right and Plain even says they are "nowhere near each other"
      But the flu and typhoid are both illnesses caused by foreign entities sabotaging your function
      edit: so in that sense rich people who aren't paying their fair share are like cancer even worse than any illness you might be able to get over with antibiotics and tea

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samsonsoturian6013 Why did you even answer? They don't understand what they are talking about because they get their knowledge from Walt Disney and infomercials.

  • @vitawater4259
    @vitawater4259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems to me that the British government, like the US government, needs to cut government spending and reduce the bloated bureaucracy that is costing an arm or a
    Leg.

  • @ninjarider2941
    @ninjarider2941 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Show me the formula for financing pensions in a preindustrial muslim society, because that's where Britain is headed.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Vhut?

    • @Charlielinja
      @Charlielinja 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Moronic comment on all fronts.

    • @chumleyk
      @chumleyk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why have you got a picture of your mother as your avatar in here?

  • @28ebdh3udnav
    @28ebdh3udnav 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations on your subscribers. I remember you having like only 20k when you started out