The sentence is ambiguous, but grammar rules suggest: Default Interpretation The daughter was drunk. Alternative Interpretation However, without additional context, it's impossible to definitively determine who was drunk. To clarify: 1. If the mother was drunk, rephrase: "A drunk mother beats up her daughter." 2. If the daughter was drunk, rephrase: "A mother beats up her drunk daughter." Clarity avoids misinterpretation.
The answer is: The mother. The pronoun "she" refers to the subject of the sentence, which is the mother. Therefore, it was the mother who was drunk. 🤷♂️ This question highlights the importance of precise language and clarification to avoid ambiguity!
Let me clarify the sentence structure for u guys "A mother" is the subject. "beats up her daughter" is the action. "because she was drunk" explains the reason for the action, attributing the drunkenness to the mother. and the pronoun "she" refers to the subject of the sentence, which is the mother!!! That's all u need to understand
In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous, so it could refer to either the mother or the daughter. The meaning depends on the context, but without further clarification, it is unclear who was drunk-whether it was the mother or the daughter.
I owe you a big one, sir. I have gone through these kind of mind-blowing sentences. For instane, below given sentence: ✓ ,I am stupid. •Fill in the blank with yes or no. Now what should we do with English!!!
Clever question! According to the statement, "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk...", the word "she" refers to the daughter. However, the context implies that it's the reason for the beating, not the beating itself. The answer is: The daughter was drunk. (The mother was the one doing the beating, presumably because of the daughter's intoxication.)
General rule of thumb for personal pronouns (he, she, it, etc.) is that they refer to the last noun used. So in this case, we would infer that it was the daughter who was drunk, because she was mentioned last.
I love how everyone seems to be speaking facts but still, everyone is saying different things. Edit: I hate to be that person who says: "I hate to be that person but TYSM FOR THE LIKES, I HAVE NEVER GOT THIS MANY!!♡" and still I am that person...
In the sentence "A mother beats up a daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" refers to the daughter, as "she" most naturally refers back to the closest noun (in this case, "daughter"). Therefore, the daughter was drunk.
In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous and can refer to either the mother or the daughter. Without additional context, it's not clear who was drunk. To clarify the situation: - If the mother was drunk and beat up her daughter, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother, who was drunk, beat up her daughter." - If the daughter was drunk and was beaten up by her mother, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother beat up her daughter because the daughter was drunk." Without further context, both interpretations are possible.
In the sentence provided, the phrase "because she was drunk" follows "the daughter." Therefore, according to the structure of the sentence, it suggests that the daughter is the one who was drunk.
ChatGPT: The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" is ambiguous and doesn't clearly specify who was drunk. The pronoun "she" could refer either to the mother or the daughter. More context or a rephrasing of the sentence is needed to clarify who exactly was drunk.
Here "because" is the conjunction connecting the two sentences... In the second sentence "she" is the pronoun used to describe the noun in the 1st sentence which is actually mother...
For those who want to know the answer: The answer to the question "a mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" is that the daughter was more likely to be drunk. The pronoun "she" could refer to either the mother or the daughter, but the common context and interpretation suggest that the daughter was drunk. Hope this could help 😅😅
The daughter was drunk Explanation:in the sentence, the mother "Beats" the daughter so it means it's in the present ; because she "was drunk" it's in the past so it means the daughter was drunk Better explanation : We have 2 options :1)the mother beats up her daughter because the mother is drunk 2)the mother beats up her daughter cuz her daughter was drunk As u can see only one option match with the sentence and it's the 2nd one Cuz
Based on the sentence structure and context, it appears that the daughter was drunk. The sentence states "because she was drunk", and "she" typically refers to the daughter in this context. However, without additional clarification or context, it's possible that the sentence could be interpreted in different ways.
صح الاب ضرب ابنه لانه كان سكران كلمة "كان" معناها الولد, مابعرف كيف المنطق باللغة و الافعال و المضارع و البطيخ ما درست الافعال ولا دخلت مدرسة بس صح كلامك a mother beats up her daughter because she "was" drunk was معناها "كانت" يعني بتجي على البنت مو على الأم
From my perspective, the mother was drunk. Because a drunk person can only beat someone without any apprehension or, the answer can also be the daughter. Because a mother can beat her daughter if the daughter is drunk(addicted to alcohol). 😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
God bless me. I learned my fourth language in America when I turn 19. English. The most boring language in the world. I'm also an educator. And secretly I want to do what you're doing and be a stand-up comedian. Thank you for taking care of me today. It is as if you went inside my brain... And you stole my idea and my this is what I deal with with my foreign parents. Parent teacher conference you need to come to my classroom there's a lot of material. Your number one fan. Atlanta Georgia you do the material and I do the writing
Remember your number one fan is from Ethiopia she's tall and beautiful and she's learning Spanish my fifth language. In six languages is sign language that I'm working on. What can you do with the brain God gave you Latin looking lover. Can I practice Spanish with you cuz you look like you're from South America. Or Spain. Are you look like you could be an Arab are you a terrorist. Lol That joke is on the house Remember I'm your number one fan and I'm from Ethiopia and I'm Muslim. Be careful what you say about me. Lol You know how we do. We don't play
In the sentence, "A mother beats her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous. Generally, "she" refers to the nearest preceding noun. In this case, "she" most likely refers to the mother. So, it means that the mother was drunk and beat her daughter. However, to make the context clear, the sentence should be more specific. For example, "A mother, who was drunk, beat her daughter," or "A mother beat her daughter because her daughter was drunk." Source : ChatGPT
In the sentence "a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" can refer to either the mother or the daughter, making it ambiguous. However, in many cases, such sentences imply that the person who committed the action (the mother in this case) is the one being described, suggesting the mother was drunk. But without additional context, the exact person who was drunk cannot be determined definitively.
@@jspa2011 The pronoun "she" in the sentence "a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk" can indeed refer to either the mother or the daughter, which creates ambiguity. Although "because" often indicates the reason for the action, it doesn't necessarily clarify who was drunk in this context. Hence, the sentence remains ambiguous without additional context.
@@nicdunz the sentence is not ambiguous if you know the grammar rules. Many people already pointed how the rule works. Any pronouns- (he she they) relates and refers to the last noun (ie. daughter) that proceeds it in a sentence.
@@sammyblar I see your point, but it's important to note that while grammatical rules provide guidelines, they don't always eliminate ambiguity. The rule that a pronoun refers to the nearest antecedent noun is a general guideline, not an absolute. Context and clarity are crucial in communication. In the sentence "A mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk," without further context, "she" can still be interpreted as either the mother or the daughter, leading to ambiguity. While grammatical rules are helpful, they don't always cover every nuance in language, especially in complex sentences. Rephrasing for clarity ensures the intended meaning is communicated effectively.
The answer is The mother was drunk.Because he said A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk,if the daughter was drunk she could have been fighting back and if the mother was not drunk she could have not been beating up her daughter. Hope this helps😇😇
@@AchiaKhatun-t6i the independent clause is followed by a dependent clause and linked with the conjunction "because" which makes the sentence a compound one. Usually the dependent clause provides additional information to the former so the "she" refers to the mother.
Just to remind everyone, this statement doesn’t show who is actually drunk. It was designed to be confusing, and more details is required in order to know who is actually drunk. 😂😂😂
The way the sentence is structured, it could be interpreted either way. However, it's more likely to be understood that the mother is the one who was drunk. The sentence construction implies the subject (the mother) was drunk. If you wanted to specify that the daughter was drunk, you could say, "A mother beats up her daughter because her daughter was drunk."
The sentence has tow meannings : the first one is the clear one wich is : the daughter who is drunk . The second one is the hidden message wich is : the mother .
The daughter. It's verb consistency. Since the mother BEATS, it should be she IS DRUNK if she is the one who is drunk but the verb used WAS DRUNK, so it's the daughter.
Great reasonings. Additionally, as a non native speaker, it is to my understanding, the mother punished her daughter for her past action (was drunk) rather than punishing her while she was drunk. 🙄
*The Mother* The riddle states: "The mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk." The word "she" refers to the mother, indicating that the mother was the one who was drunk. The correct interpretation is: - The mother was drunk. - The mother beat up her daughter. Well-crafted riddle
@@AlemayehuAdmassae-d6xbecause she was drunk is nearest to the word daughter. Usually if the motherbis the culprit then say "The mother ,who was drunk, beat the daughter."
The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" implies that the reason for the mother beating up the daughter is that the daughter was drunk. The pronoun "she" refers to the daughter, as it is the subject of the clause "she was drunk."
Dear@@ivonnenkerbu4231 I would tell the same, but with a comma after the word "daughter", that's all, which is not the case in the written sentence. And, when speaking, a pause in the speech after saying the word "daughter", which is the case, if you listen carefully. So, this video is bullshit because of that difference, no pause (comma) on the text message, but a pause (comma), in the spoken message. Thus, this short is completely inconsistent.
In my opinion I think it's the mother because the statement that was given was possible although it's far from the noun it might make sense so I think it's the mother because when your drunk you cant control yourself. I wonder if I'm correct(again)😂🤔
In the situation where a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk, it is likely that the mother is the one who is drunk. As an human beings with self-conscious, alcohol can impair judgment, coordination, and decision-making abilities, which can lead to aggressive or violent behaviors. It is also possible that the daughter was also intoxicated, but the information provided indicates that the mother was the one who was drunk in this scenario😂
In this case, the mother is drunk. In the video he says that, "A mother beats her daughter because she was drunk." So, if we put some thought into the matter, the mother beat her daughter because the mother was drunk. Why? It's because the daughter needs to be a small kid for the mother to beat her. Hope this helps! 😁👍
I think the mother was drunk. Technically, you don't beat someone who is already drunk. It would only make things worse but when you are drunk, you beat others without even realizing it.
I'm from UK and English is my mother tongue. So, here is the answer: We cannot know it due to pronoun ambiguity. Grammatically, in the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous. It could refer to either the mother or the daughter. Without additional context, it is impossible to determine definitively who was drunk based solely on this sentence.
I totally disagree with you, but the confusion come only on the difference of the spoken sentence, with a pause after "daughter", meaning the mother was drunk, and without a pause in the written sentence (lack of a comma after daughter), meaning the daughter was drunk. Importance of a good spelling and prononciation and of a good usage of ponctuation.
@@alenigomera3531 For the spoken part, the mother is the answer, as there is a tiny, but real, pause in the speech after the word daughter. But, if you are deaf, you hear nothing and so, you have only one solution, that is to stick to the incorrectly written phrase (incorrectly written because it should have a comma after the word "daughter", which is not the case), and thus, the deaf person would normally tell that the answer is the daughter, and not the mother. But this "short" video, as a whole, due to this inconsistency between the spoken part and the written part, is pure bullshit, due to lack of a good knowledge of the language (bad teachers, bad pupils, bad programs, incorrect prononciation, incorrect ponctuation, etc.). I'd add that if you're deaf and blind, you don't even know what is going on, so no answer is possible at all. Bad luck ! Is it clear ?
@@gerardgervais4097there's a clear answer to this Notice, it's not beat, it's "beats". So it's in the present. And she WAS drunk So if mother WAS drunk and is fine now, why would she beat her daughter? It's the daughter who was drunk
The phrase indicates that the mother reacted violently to her daughter's behavior, which was being drunk. The emphasis is on the daughter's state, suggesting that her drunkenness led to the mother's response.
Ans. The daughter was drunk Explanation:- The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk", uses 'she' to refer to the most recent subject mentioned, which in this case is 'daughter'. Therefore, the daughter was the one who was drunk, leading to the mother beating her up.
MOTHER or SHE (subject of the principal clause) HER DAUGHTER or HER (object of the principle clause) ...SHE(MOTHER) WAS DRUNK. THANKS from AZERBAIJAN 🇦🇿
@@sonyz3888ok then let me explain this A mother BEATS up her daughter because she WAS drunk! it's BEATS, so it's in present And she WAS drunk, so she is not drunk now So it would be illogical that the mother is in her right mind and still beats up her daughter, don't you think? But the daughter was drunk, so the mother BEATS her up, that makes sense So the answer is Daughter
Grammatically, the structure "A mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk" is more likely to mean that the mother was drunk. In English, the pronoun "she" typically refers to the subject of the main clause, which in this case is "the mother." However, because the sentence can lead to ambiguity, it is always best to provide clearer context or rephrase the sentence to specify who was drunk: - If the mother was drunk: "A mother, who was drunk, beat up her daughter." - If the daughter was drunk: "A mother beat up her daughter because the daughter was drunk."
@@Moody-bv9tdit's actually very easy, and a pretty clear answer that you can't deny to It's the daughter. Notice that "beats" means it's in the present. And she WAS drunk. So, the mother WAS drunk, that means the mother is fine now so WHY would she beat her daughter? Daughter was drunk so mother beat her
There is a difference. She was drunk = Adjective - A state of feeling/behaving drunk/p!ssed/intoxicated. She had drunk = Verb - Implies she had a drink of something, but not necessarily enough to be intoxicated.
The sense of this sentence coming out that: A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk. Means mother was drunk. If her daughter was drunk this sentence is to be said:- A mother beats up her daughter because her daughter was drunk. Correct me if i am wrong
The person who created this question is drunk 😂😂😂
sooo true
@@susharwaddioo6212 yeah🤣🤣
😂
Yes
😂😂 definitely 😁😂😂😅😅
In English, pronouns usually refer to their closest preceding noun. In this sentence, "daughter" is the closest noun to "she".
حالا همینو به فارسی توضیح بده تا منم بفهمم😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
and what is you answer
Thank you
But is it possible that the first subject be the culprit
That doesn't always apply. Leave all those rules
For me the mother beat up her daughter because thr mother was drunk
One of.them.was.drunk😅😂
😂😂
Lol great 😂😂
Wow.. you must be genius 😂😂
mybe both
🤪😅😅😅
The sentence is ambiguous, but grammar rules suggest:
Default Interpretation
The daughter was drunk.
Alternative Interpretation
However, without additional context, it's impossible to definitively determine who was drunk. To clarify:
1. If the mother was drunk, rephrase: "A drunk mother beats up her daughter."
2. If the daughter was drunk, rephrase: "A mother beats up her drunk daughter."
Clarity avoids misinterpretation.
Its not excactly the same sentence because you are not saying the reason.
The answer is: The mother.
The pronoun "she" refers to the subject of the sentence, which is the mother. Therefore, it was the mother who was drunk. 🤷♂️
This question highlights the importance of precise language and clarification to avoid ambiguity!
the mother beatsup her daughter because she was drunk
Bro the mother beatsup her daughter because 'She' was drunk
answer:daughter
because 'she' is the closes pronoun to daughter
It was the daughter b
Let me clarify the sentence structure for u guys
"A mother" is the subject.
"beats up her daughter" is the action.
"because she was drunk" explains the reason for the action, attributing the drunkenness to the mother.
and the pronoun "she" refers to the subject of the sentence, which is the mother!!!
That's all u need to understand
I think that also
In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous, so it could refer to either the mother or the daughter. The meaning depends on the context, but without further clarification, it is unclear who was drunk-whether it was the mother or the daughter.
Mother
Yap yap
Chat GTP
she ❤❤❤❤
I agree 👍
My answer: daughter
Because the nearest noun to the adjective/verb is the one
Daughter
What
Nooooo
I owe you a big one, sir. I have gone through these kind of mind-blowing sentences. For instane, below given sentence:
✓ ,I am stupid.
•Fill in the blank with yes or no.
Now what should we do with English!!!
Neither
I will say, ' !yes '.
*No comments*
They say
I have given only two option: Yes or No
Clever question!
According to the statement, "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk...", the word "she" refers to the daughter. However, the context implies that it's the reason for the beating, not the beating itself.
The answer is: The daughter was drunk.
(The mother was the one doing the beating, presumably because of the daughter's intoxication.)
The daughter
What an use of English as it really is
Same"she"Refer Mother
Both Of Them Are Girls
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅
so what if i wanna say "the mother was drunk"?
how would it be then?
That looks like ai generated
Daughter. 2 ways:-
1. Mother knows best☠
2. Usually the noun closer to pronoun is accepted
Nope. A pronoun is used for the subject or the first noun used in a sentence
So, the mother was drunk 👍🏻
Answer is mom
yeah
Daughter 😂
General rule of thumb for personal pronouns (he, she, it, etc.) is that they refer to the last noun used. So in this case, we would infer that it was the daughter who was drunk, because she was mentioned last.
Nerdd🤓
Thank You
@@ragnarbawk5930Get a life.
He's simply sharing knowledge, if you have insecurities, just don't throw it at orther people
But he mention her daughter
That means that daughter has no direct connection to this question
It’s about her means the subject person
Is Mother ❤❤
This is why any language should be clear & concise to convey the succinct meanings.
"Who was drunk?"
*Uhm she was drunk*
I love how everyone seems to be speaking facts but still, everyone is saying different things.
Edit: I hate to be that person who says: "I hate to be that person but TYSM FOR THE LIKES, I HAVE NEVER GOT THIS MANY!!♡" and still I am that person...
The mother ❤❤❤
In the sentence "A mother beats up a daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" refers to the daughter, as "she" most naturally refers back to the closest noun (in this case, "daughter"). Therefore, the daughter was drunk.
Nah dude u just trippin the mother was drunk bc most of the drunk people gets furious dude
@@janjansevilla7037 R U drank?!
Is ru drunk @@Anonymous-vt5zd
@@Anonymous-vt5zdhe's actually right, he's not drunk
In the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous and can refer to either the mother or the daughter. Without additional context, it's not clear who was drunk.
To clarify the situation:
- If the mother was drunk and beat up her daughter, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother, who was drunk, beat up her daughter."
- If the daughter was drunk and was beaten up by her mother, the sentence could be rephrased as: "A mother beat up her daughter because the daughter was drunk."
Without further context, both interpretations are possible.
They both are drunk
Use your brain 🧠
😮
@@MX_BGthey are fighting 😂
The important of complex sentence rule and the context we want to talk about 😂
You made the longest comment you should get a world record for doing the longest comment
In the sentence provided, the phrase "because she was drunk" follows "the daughter." Therefore, according to the structure of the sentence, it suggests that the daughter is the one who was drunk.
No one asked for a yappichino jk
@@ambiligeorge1052brain rot core💀
Thanks
reading all that felt like i am in english class
@@anna-l9o2w Funny because this is actually from my English Teacher since I saw this video next to him.
The daughter❤🎉
ChatGPT: The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" is ambiguous and doesn't clearly specify who was drunk. The pronoun "she" could refer either to the mother or the daughter. More context or a rephrasing of the sentence is needed to clarify who exactly was drunk.
Here "because" is the conjunction connecting the two sentences... In the second sentence "she" is the pronoun used to describe the noun in the 1st sentence which is actually mother...
Yup
'She' can refer to any previously mentioned female noun.
Yes
You can’t prove it by grammar because she refers to mother and daughter
For those who want to know the answer:
The answer to the question "a mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" is that the daughter was more likely to be drunk. The pronoun "she" could refer to either the mother or the daughter, but the common context and interpretation suggest that the daughter was drunk.
Hope this could help 😅😅
Another great video!👍
In Syntax, we call this as a case of ambiguity which carries two possibilities.
DAUGHTER
No, It isn't.
The "she" pronoun refers to the nearest preceding noun; in this case, it is the "mother" (who was drunk and beat up her daughter).
@@markwahlberg9160even with what you're saying it would still be daughter as it has the word "daughter" closer to the "she" pronoun
Now I'm drunk😂
😂😂😂😂😂 That's legit
😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂❤
Hhhhhh
The polite, optimistic teacher ,God bless you 🙏
Your English is good made my day
daughter ofcourse ❤😮
It is the mother
No bro it's not daughter it's mother
Nah its her daughter kiddo cuz u can identify with a noun proceeding of 'drunk' that is closest to 'she'
THE MOM
The daughter was drunk
Explanation:in the sentence, the mother "Beats" the daughter so it means it's in the present ;
because she "was drunk" it's in the past so it means the daughter was drunk
Better explanation :
We have 2 options :1)the mother beats up her daughter because the mother is drunk
2)the mother beats up her daughter cuz her daughter was drunk
As u can see only one option match with the sentence and it's the 2nd one
Cuz
Respect bro😊
Thx
Damn Bro your smart😮
Well done 👍😎👌
@@MaryHillery-rl8ke ty
Based on the sentence structure and context, it appears that the daughter was drunk. The sentence states "because she was drunk", and "she" typically refers to the daughter in this context. However, without additional clarification or context, it's possible that the sentence could be interpreted in different ways.
The mother was so drunk that she beat her own daughter 😅😅
ChatGPT ahh response
wait
it is you !
you could do it as a daughter is slighty more casual however it is totes grammatically correct!
One of them n ho create this question ❤😊
This could cause headache in a court of law 😅😂😂😅
Without more context, we can t definitely say who was drunk. The 2 interpretations are possible
نفس الشئ في اللغة العربية : الأب ضرب ابنه لأنه كان سكرانا
لذا اعتقد ان الإبن هو السكران لأنه اقرب الى صفة السُكر
فقط😁
صح
الاب ضرب ابنه لانه كان سكران
كلمة "كان" معناها الولد, مابعرف كيف المنطق باللغة و الافعال و المضارع و البطيخ
ما درست الافعال ولا دخلت مدرسة بس صح كلامك
a mother beats up her daughter because she "was" drunk
was
معناها "كانت"
يعني بتجي على البنت مو على الأم
From my perspective, the mother was drunk. Because a drunk person can only beat someone without any apprehension or, the answer can also be the daughter. Because a mother can beat her daughter if the daughter is drunk(addicted to alcohol). 😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Is everyone here drunk?
The daughter 😊😊😊
I think the answer is Mother
Her daughter of course .
Your videos are so funny ,important and different 💚
No the mother drunk
Subject + verb + complement
God bless me. I learned my fourth language in America when I turn 19. English. The most boring language in the world. I'm also an educator. And secretly I want to do what you're doing and be a stand-up comedian. Thank you for taking care of me today. It is as if you went inside my brain... And you stole my idea and my this is what I deal with with my foreign parents. Parent teacher conference you need to come to my classroom there's a lot of material. Your number one fan. Atlanta Georgia you do the material and I do the writing
Remember your number one fan is from Ethiopia she's tall and beautiful and she's learning Spanish my fifth language. In six languages is sign language that I'm working on. What can you do with the brain God gave you Latin looking lover. Can I practice Spanish with you cuz you look like you're from South America. Or Spain. Are you look like you could be an Arab are you a terrorist. Lol
That joke is on the house
Remember I'm your number one fan and I'm from Ethiopia and I'm Muslim. Be careful what you say about me. Lol
You know how we do. We don't play
In the sentence, "A mother beats her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous. Generally, "she" refers to the nearest preceding noun. In this case, "she" most likely refers to the mother.
So, it means that the mother was drunk and beat her daughter.
However, to make the context clear, the sentence should be more specific. For example, "A mother, who was drunk, beat her daughter," or "A mother beat her daughter because her daughter was drunk."
Source : ChatGPT
The best explanation
fire
Daughter is the nearest preceding noun...
Ja.
By your logic daughter is the nearest proceeding noun, not the mother.
In the sentence "a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" can refer to either the mother or the daughter, making it ambiguous. However, in many cases, such sentences imply that the person who committed the action (the mother in this case) is the one being described, suggesting the mother was drunk. But without additional context, the exact person who was drunk cannot be determined definitively.
Your logic is not logicing with english grammar rules
The mother is right answer, The word because is the reason
@@jspa2011 The pronoun "she" in the sentence "a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk" can indeed refer to either the mother or the daughter, which creates ambiguity. Although "because" often indicates the reason for the action, it doesn't necessarily clarify who was drunk in this context. Hence, the sentence remains ambiguous without additional context.
@@nicdunz the sentence is not ambiguous if you know the grammar rules. Many people already pointed how the rule works. Any pronouns- (he she they) relates and refers to the last noun (ie. daughter) that proceeds it in a sentence.
@@sammyblar I see your point, but it's important to note that while grammatical rules provide guidelines, they don't always eliminate ambiguity. The rule that a pronoun refers to the nearest antecedent noun is a general guideline, not an absolute. Context and clarity are crucial in communication. In the sentence "A mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk," without further context, "she" can still be interpreted as either the mother or the daughter, leading to ambiguity. While grammatical rules are helpful, they don't always cover every nuance in language, especially in complex sentences. Rephrasing for clarity ensures the intended meaning is communicated effectively.
The mother absolutely ❤
Just God knows. Who was drunk
NO is the daughter
My hero❤❤❤
"i have a question"
"Shoot"💀
Wydm?
The 'She' was drunk😂
Daughter?!
Sss@@RebeccaSmith-ek7qz
@@RebeccaSmith-ek7qz no..."she" was...hahaha
Correct mother was drunk
Absoluely incorrect@@Un__ie
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ i enjoy these friends
الضمير يرجع إلى أقرب المذكور
The answer is The mother was drunk.Because he said A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk,if the daughter was drunk she could have been fighting back and if the mother was not drunk she could have not been beating up her daughter.
Hope this helps😇😇
The ans is daughter bro
By this sentence structure,I can tell you don't know grammar very well
The mother was drunk at all 😂😂
Mother
Did you learn english witt Mr Bean ?
I just love your expressions ❤
This was the exact thing our english teacher took up as example TODAY.
THE TOPIC IS "misplaced modifiers"
The mother 😊😂
I think so
Agreed
@@jadelkhadiryene4597yeah
How?? Could you explain me please?
@@AchiaKhatun-t6i the independent clause is followed by a dependent clause and linked with the conjunction "because" which makes the sentence a compound one. Usually the dependent clause provides additional information to the former so the "she" refers to the mother.
100% Mother
You’re good teacher 🎉 🎉
The man ran after the ice cream truck because he was hungry.
Her daughter.
Thank you so much for your good lesson
mother(the conjunction word of because tells about the pronoun of the first sentence .)
@hailachin7104 oh nooo really it was hard 😑
Daughter because she drunk
İts just feel!!
Just to remind everyone, this statement doesn’t show who is actually drunk. It was designed to be confusing, and more details is required in order to know who is actually drunk. 😂😂😂
The way the sentence is structured, it could be interpreted either way. However, it's more likely to be understood that the mother is the one who was drunk. The sentence construction implies the subject (the mother) was drunk.
If you wanted to specify that the daughter was drunk, you could say, "A mother beats up her daughter because her daughter was drunk."
The daughter was drunk and she is beating by her mother
If this were an exam question, it would be a calamity
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yh this is examinable in critical thinking and logical reasoning. It's a course
😂😂😂😂😂 lol
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The daughter of course❤
For Me i guess Both
I think that’s a best example for the people who study English ~❤❤❤
Daughter
Cuz, emm... I think it is 😂
Thank you so much sir
I think the mother was the drunk one because the mother was the subject and the daughter was the object (receiver of the verb "beat").
Yes I agree with you 👏👏
There's one answer and it's daughter
Daughter was drunk.
Mother is always correct. ❤😂😂❤
Those who think it is correct. ✅
You poor fellow indian? Knowing that is from your comment's quality, shame 🤮
yeah, sure. and then she beats up her daughter.
😂😂
The sentence has tow meannings :
the first one is the clear one wich is : the daughter who is drunk .
The second one is the hidden message wich is : the mother .
So who was drunk? Mother?
Nice one
The daughter. It's verb consistency. Since the mother BEATS, it should be she IS DRUNK if she is the one who is drunk but the verb used WAS DRUNK, so it's the daughter.
You good! BRAVO🎉
@@EberechukwuUgo-kk5qb Thank you.
That's pretty accurate.. I'm impressed!!
@@ZansoT Thank you.
Great reasonings. Additionally, as a non native speaker, it is to my understanding, the mother punished her daughter for her past action (was drunk) rather than punishing her while she was drunk. 🙄
*The Mother*
The riddle states: "The mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk."
The word "she" refers to the mother, indicating that the mother was the one who was drunk.
The correct interpretation is:
- The mother was drunk.
- The mother beat up her daughter.
Well-crafted riddle
not an explination
The Daughter❤❤❤❤❤❤
The mother
😂❤❤
❤daughter
No ❤mother
Daughter
@@Bint-e-Asim no mother. If you say daughter, what is your reason?
@@AlemayehuAdmassae-d6x because her daughter was drunk so she beat her
@@AlemayehuAdmassae-d6xbecause she was drunk is nearest to the word daughter. Usually if the motherbis the culprit then say "The mother ,who was drunk, beat the daughter."
Sir u gotta tell us please 😂
Mother drunk ❌
Daughter drunk ❌
Bro is drunk ✅😅😂
The answer is either the mom or the daughter depending on which word you emphasize
The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk" implies that the reason for the mother beating up the daughter is that the daughter was drunk. The pronoun "she" refers to the daughter, as it is the subject of the clause "she was drunk."
What would the sentence be if the mother was the drunk one?
@@ivonnenkerbu4231 Good question for Hanif
Hey
Bro is using Google and acting like pro, more details are required buddy
Dear@@ivonnenkerbu4231 I would tell the same, but with a comma after the word "daughter", that's all, which is not the case in the written sentence. And, when speaking, a pause in the speech after saying the word "daughter", which is the case, if you listen carefully.
So, this video is bullshit because of that difference, no pause (comma) on the text message, but a pause (comma), in the spoken message.
Thus, this short is completely inconsistent.
Bro mother drunk😂 done 😅
TEAM DAUGHTER HERE
👇
In my opinion I think it's the mother because the statement that was given was possible although it's far from the noun it might make sense so I think it's the mother because when your drunk you cant control yourself.
I wonder if I'm correct(again)😂🤔
In the situation where a mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk, it is likely that the mother is the one who is drunk. As an human beings with self-conscious, alcohol can impair judgment, coordination, and decision-making abilities, which can lead to aggressive or violent behaviors. It is also possible that the daughter was also intoxicated, but the information provided indicates that the mother was the one who was drunk in this scenario😂
all of you gys get the answer from ai
In this case, the mother is drunk. In the video he says that, "A mother beats her daughter because she was drunk." So, if we put some thought into the matter, the mother beat her daughter because the mother was drunk. Why? It's because the daughter needs to be a small kid for the mother to beat her. Hope this helps! 😁👍
The mother was drunk otherwise the question should like that à mother béats her daughter because the later was drunk .so means the daughtzr was drunk
🤨
Or her daughter was drunk @@ShellaIthierShella
😂😂😂 so funny
She could be underage drinking, which could be why the mother is mad.
It's the mother for sure 😊
no, it's the daughter
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙖𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙧𝙪𝙣𝙠🥴🍺
The mother❤❤❤
I think the mother was drunk. Technically, you don't beat someone who is already drunk. It would only make things worse but when you are drunk, you beat others without even realizing it.
I kinda agree but there is some trickery here
urh.., wrong grammar
Her daughter
great
@@faceyourfate970 if you are talking about me, I apologize. I am still learning. 😊😊
I'm from UK and English is my mother tongue. So, here is the answer: We cannot know it due to pronoun ambiguity. Grammatically, in the sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk," the pronoun "she" is ambiguous. It could refer to either the mother or the daughter. Without additional context, it is impossible to determine definitively who was drunk based solely on this sentence.
I totally disagree with you, but the confusion come only on the difference of the spoken sentence, with a pause after "daughter", meaning the mother was drunk, and without a pause in the written sentence (lack of a comma after daughter), meaning the daughter was drunk.
Importance of a good spelling and prononciation and of a good usage of ponctuation.
@@gerardgervais4097so, rhe mother is the answer?
@@alenigomera3531 For the spoken part, the mother is the answer, as there is a tiny, but real, pause in the speech after the word daughter. But, if you are deaf, you hear nothing and so, you have only one solution, that is to stick to the incorrectly written phrase (incorrectly written because it should have a comma after the word "daughter", which is not the case), and thus, the deaf person would normally tell that the answer is the daughter, and not the mother. But this "short" video, as a whole, due to this inconsistency between the spoken part and the written part, is pure bullshit, due to lack of a good knowledge of the language (bad teachers, bad pupils, bad programs, incorrect prononciation, incorrect ponctuation, etc.). I'd add that if you're deaf and blind, you don't even know what is going on, so no answer is possible at all. Bad luck ! Is it clear ?
@@gerardgervais4097And I totally disagree with you!!!😑
@@gerardgervais4097there's a clear answer to this
Notice, it's not beat, it's "beats". So it's in the present. And she WAS drunk
So if mother WAS drunk and is fine now, why would she beat her daughter? It's the daughter who was drunk
The phrase indicates that the mother reacted violently to her daughter's behavior, which was being drunk. The emphasis is on the daughter's state, suggesting that her drunkenness led to the mother's response.
The guy drunk who made this question! 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Ans. The daughter was drunk
Explanation:- The sentence "A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk", uses 'she' to refer to the most recent subject mentioned, which in this case is 'daughter'. Therefore, the daughter was the one who was drunk, leading to the mother beating her up.
The daughter was drunk, but the mother mistook her for a piñata at a party and couldn't resist!😂
Both
Who agrees with me
👇🏻
MOTHER or SHE (subject of the principal clause)
HER DAUGHTER or HER (object of the principle clause)
...SHE(MOTHER) WAS DRUNK.
THANKS from AZERBAIJAN 🇦🇿
HER(alone) can't be subject.
If her daughter was meant
HER DAUGHTER HAD HAVE BEEN USED as the subject of the subordinate clause.
THANKS
@@sonyz3888ok then let me explain this
A mother BEATS up her daughter because she WAS drunk!
it's BEATS, so it's in present
And she WAS drunk, so she is not drunk now
So it would be illogical that the mother is in her right mind and still beats up her daughter, don't you think?
But the daughter was drunk, so the mother BEATS her up, that makes sense
So the answer is Daughter
The daughter
Grammatically, the structure "A mother beat up her daughter because she was drunk" is more likely to mean that the mother was drunk. In English, the pronoun "she" typically refers to the subject of the main clause, which in this case is "the mother."
However, because the sentence can lead to ambiguity, it is always best to provide clearer context or rephrase the sentence to specify who was drunk:
- If the mother was drunk: "A mother, who was drunk, beat up her daughter."
- If the daughter was drunk: "A mother beat up her daughter because the daughter was drunk."
i like chatgpt too
@@Lyroxc.1 everyone else was doing it, I had to hop on that 😂
@@Moody-bv9tdit's actually very easy, and a pretty clear answer that you can't deny to
It's the daughter.
Notice that "beats" means it's in the present. And she WAS drunk. So, the mother WAS drunk, that means the mother is fine now so WHY would she beat her daughter? Daughter was drunk so mother beat her
She Was Drunk ❎
She Had Drunk ✅
There is a difference.
She was drunk = Adjective - A state of feeling/behaving drunk/p!ssed/intoxicated.
She had drunk = Verb - Implies she had a drink of something, but not necessarily enough to be intoxicated.
In this case 'drunk ' is used as an adjective.
The daughter obviously
No
@@najatsoliman2220 yeah the daughter is drunk in the sentence we talked about daughter not about mom
As an Indian I think daughter was drunk because the mother was never wrong...😂😂
😅
both of them 😁
The mother
The sense of this sentence coming out that: A mother beats up her daughter because she was drunk. Means mother was drunk. If her daughter was drunk this sentence is to be said:- A mother beats up her daughter because her daughter was drunk.
Correct me if i am wrong
Daughter❤😊