I always refer to you guys, whether just out of curiosity or because I'm looking to buy a new phone so when you said you still haven't reached 100K I was shocked. We need to get you to 1 mil!
@@shebjjeje9720 overall iPhone video are better but colors accuracy even in video pixel was better. They also closed the gap a lots compared to previous years (Video on most android flagship is actually nice now where they where horrible a few years back)
All three are very good in camera department . they're flagships well 3 of them have their strengths and weaknesses so it's up to the consumer to pick one
Finally X80pro arrived. Vivoreally doingwell nowadays thank you so much sir for this informative video. And 100k subs soon . Lets go guys we can do it .
First, don't compare 8k and 4k, very unfair comparison as 8k is a more experimental feature. Second, Vivo seemed to have hazier photos, and would sometimes just overbrighten the image, make the white shirt have a slight glow. The S22 Ultra had the best background noise cancelation, not sure why you didnt mention that. Would hope to see some better logic with these comparisons like other reviewers, like MrWhoseTheBoss.
We don't compare 8k to 4k, we make sure that the footage is there so there are no question marks in the viewers mind. 8k is just a bonus if a phone has this feature, and another bonus if the video is stabilized and of good quality. Since we take a lot of footage, we try to review them as a whole - and time to time talk about individual photos if there are big and consistent issues or certain traits. You can see what Samsung does to my white shirt at 1:14 - but I prefer not to slam the phone over something like this because it's a one-off thing and this issue won't be replicated in every single photo. So when you mention a couple of things about Vivo like it sometimes making the image brighter, I think it's important to realize you can do that for every single phone in every single comparison. Thanks for your comment!
Pixel 6 Pro seemed to have the best shots on most of these images. I have the Pixel 6 Pro and I have yet to find a phone that takes better still photography than the P6Pro, not even the iPhone 13 Pro Max. iPhone 13 Pro Max does have better video though, but I feel that will change with the Pixel 7 Pro since Google paid specific attention to upgrading the video processing capabilities on the Tensor2 SOC.
All mentioned phones are great with outstanding camera performance. Pick any and you are not going to regret. Happy owner of Pixel 6 Pro (moved from iphone 11) 😁.
3:10 Sorry, but that's not true. Google outperforms Vivo's tele camera partly due to the hardware. Both periscope cameras deliver about the same number of sensor pixels per angle, but Vivo's periscope camera has an effective diameter of 3.5mm, whereas Google has 5.4mm. This leads to noticeably less diffraction and diffraction is relevant for Vivo's periscope camera. The larger effective diameter and higher focal length of Google's periscope (19mm vs 11.8mm) also lead to more light from objects, this leads to a better signal to noise ratio. I have examined Google's "super res" zoom from the Pixel 6 Pro and sadly, it's really just a marketing stunt. I even tested that traditional digital zoom from a conventional camera with the same number of pixels per angle (as the periscope camera in its 12 megapixel binning mode) and same effective diameter can outperform Google's digital zoom. Yes, it's possible that Vivo's algorithms are worse than Google's, but this doesn't mean that Google's "super res" zoom actually works. I tested it as I said. It's just a marketing stunt, theory and practice are different things.
Have you tried super res zoom on ported gcam? try it on realme phone with no tele lens and compare the 10x result from stock camera app and ported gcam, you will see a big difference
While I do agree with you about the diameter of the camera being a factor, I don't agree with Super Res Zoom being a useless marketing stunt. You could say that the algorithm is worse or better for any camera phone on the market to justify a result, but I find it hard to ignore when they are pretty transparent with the research and development they've put into this feature that they first implemented in the Pixel 3. There are quite a few people that have tested it and had the exact opposite opinion as you, so having tested it doesn't really prove anything to be the ultimate truth in the end. Here's a reference for details, with live examples comparing the Pixel 2 to the Pixel 3 with Super Res Zoom: ai.googleblog.com/2018/10/see-better-and-further-with-super-res.html
Well it's better for google to have a" good camera", because it's all that it has. 1.Bizarre and repulsive design 2.30% weaker processor 3.Shitty battery life 4.Horrible charging time 5.Abominable packaging (I mean, NO CHARGER or anything?!) 6.Suicidal depreciation..... Really, a phone worth every cent..... right! Better buy some decent SLR..... AND a decent phone (and still save some money).
@@versus_com utterly confused as to how you don't have over a million subscribers!! Your content is so clean and concise. Some other channels with a million sine are awful lol I can't wait to hit 2k subs haha
Now you are at 100 k subscribers! Congratulations! 💐🥂🍾🌻🌺 1:27 What do I think about daylight photos with the main camera? Samsung doesn't have a chance against Vivo and Google (and I'm a Samsung fanboy)!
I think you forget to mention the detail on samsung's pic @2:07 you said Samsung's pics r darker, i think it's not dark but cooler tone, but the detail on ur face is better, you can see the lines on ur face r more pronounce.
Yer mate macro again . But has the other got long exposure and action pan ???? So how can you take points of when its got something the others hasnt mmm no point in it 🤔
Action pan is a really cool feature, you're right! The reason we can't get into detail into all of these features is that the videos would be extremely long, and it's not possible to compare two different features on different phones because this is a fixed category camera comparison. Thanks for your comment!
@@versus_com granted mate 👌 but when we know the pixel doesnt have a macro. No point bringing it up as it has another' two tricks up it sleeve lol or call it a draw. I used to have a pixel 6 pro. Now i have the samy s22 let me say i miss my pixel for some pictures. See samsung still so fussy with portrait s ie stand 1. Meter back etc grr so annoying. Were pixel any distance take and boom sorted . Its the little things. Like when you zoom in on pixel 50mp pictures it holds more detail . Samy with its 50mp doesn't .))
You really gave portrait to Vivo? lmao. Its clear you dont take colour accuracy into consideration for these tests. And it feels like your narrating to a completely different picture that youre showing. The vivo was so hazy, especially in portrait mode. And Samsung video straight up looked better than Google's not to mention when you showed the 8k footage of the boat.
The first two Portrait photos of the Galaxy, as well as the one on 2:00 look off to me because of the lack of focus, to be honest. It's interesting to me how you didn't have an issue with those photos. And also about 'color accuracy', my shirt is white as day, but half the time it looks blue on the Galaxy, and even darker blue on the Pixel - so we do take it into consideration. Since we take a lot of footage, we try to review them as a whole - and time to time talk about individual photos if there are big and consistent issues or certain traits. I'm not narrating every single photo as we pass by, but we often show a photo if I'm talking specifically about that image. Pause the video at 3:28 and 3:34, and you can better see the loss of detail on the side of Samsung. If we were to take 100 videos, I'm pretty sure Samsung would have the best overall videos - but sometimes, phones perform differently in different conditions. The ultrawide video is also too dark, with the least amount of detail out of the three. I hope these explanations helped you understand our thought process!
The video shooting being in only 1 place and being still didn't impress me to be honest. We need to see samples in different environments and lighting conditions to see how they actually perform most of the time. And movement, of course. Because exposure control is important and I hate when a phone cannot control the exposure well in a video just because it saw a bright spot.
U need to test the HDR in daytime shots. With Extreme HDR situation, Vivo will come on top. The overall best in my opinion. 1)Vivo 2)Pixel 3)Samsung The day time and night time stills are way more important than the other categories and Vivo did well in these two major categories.
The night shots , portraits specially at night is what really matters , the night behavior of cameras at night i mean, as all flagships get decent photos in daylight,, thats why i ll give the win to vivo .. the crystal clear night shots with no flares and onspot focusing is unparalleled... I can't think of a situation where i would Zoom for 60x or 20x actually as mostly all of us Zoom to Maximum around 7x to 10x. for a flagship phone , the Dynamic range and night shots are rhe keypoints thats where i see Vivo Excels,, even at daytime the photos looks with a wide dynamic range and pleasing to the eye. look at your shirt in @1:15 its blown out with the s22 and its blue on google but the vivo managed to be onspot ... also @1:18 the Dynamic range .. @1.45 @2:01 all of these are superiority of optics in vivo which should be mentioned , these things raise the level of competition and push companies to raise their par and progress , so kudos to vivo for that. BUT its front facing camera is not on par actually while the Mic noise cancelling is stunning idk how you put it atlast ...
Thanks for your long and detailed comment! About the mic quality - the problem wasn't the noise cancelling, but the general quality of the sound. It doesn't sound as clean as the other two.
I thought that the vivo was the only phone currently available with the new Samsung sensor. With the comparison of night shots which phone was fastest in taking, and processing, a photo?
There were no noticeable differences, around half a second each. Sometimes they took 2-3 seconds if the software got involved, and around 7 seconds in the photo under the bridge where there was zero light.
shame on Samsung for this horribe photo quality! the people in the photos look like they are about to die . fck on the sharpness at 100x nobody needs this. but that is the reason why more and more people switch to other companys
Pixel is always the best when it comes to exposing the highlights properly during daytime.
Samsung too much better 👌 quality
@@jamalr2323 samsung fans?!
Agree, pixel has the best balance
Agreed
NO lol
I always refer to you guys, whether just out of curiosity or because I'm looking to buy a new phone so when you said you still haven't reached 100K I was shocked. We need to get you to 1 mil!
You're too kind bro! Almost at 100k!
I am waiting for pixel 7 pro because I am mesmerized by its design
Vivo just showed some great work!
True!
X80 pictures are the most-pleasing, and I really like the overall design. If the X90 comes with a decent macro, I would be willing to switch.
For me Google pixel is still the king of cameras 🙌
Yes colors were more authentic on the Pixel in every aspects and its look more realistic.
For photos 💯 Video iPhone is king 👑
@@shebjjeje9720 overall iPhone video are better but colors accuracy even in video pixel was better. They also closed the gap a lots compared to previous years (Video on most android flagship is actually nice now where they where horrible a few years back)
Nah..
Pixel 6 - daytime
Vivo x80 pro - nightime
@@a.s.7996 my results on my pixel for nighttime are much better than this somehow. I don't have any of those light flares.
Pixel 6 pro is the android king camera for sure , i can't wait for the pixel 7 pro
did u guys clean up vivo's camera glass? look like most of the photo lack contrast
All three are very good in camera department . they're flagships well 3 of them have their strengths and weaknesses so it's up to the consumer to pick one
1:15 apparently he decided to wear a different coloured shirt for each photo xD
Some of the Vivo pics look kind of hazy. Is that a thing, or was there just something on the lens?
Finally X80pro arrived. Vivoreally doingwell nowadays thank you so much sir for this informative video. And 100k subs soon . Lets go guys we can do it .
First, don't compare 8k and 4k, very unfair comparison as 8k is a more experimental feature. Second, Vivo seemed to have hazier photos, and would sometimes just overbrighten the image, make the white shirt have a slight glow. The S22 Ultra had the best background noise cancelation, not sure why you didnt mention that. Would hope to see some better logic with these comparisons like other reviewers, like MrWhoseTheBoss.
We don't compare 8k to 4k, we make sure that the footage is there so there are no question marks in the viewers mind. 8k is just a bonus if a phone has this feature, and another bonus if the video is stabilized and of good quality.
Since we take a lot of footage, we try to review them as a whole - and time to time talk about individual photos if there are big and consistent issues or certain traits. You can see what Samsung does to my white shirt at 1:14 - but I prefer not to slam the phone over something like this because it's a one-off thing and this issue won't be replicated in every single photo. So when you mention a couple of things about Vivo like it sometimes making the image brighter, I think it's important to realize you can do that for every single phone in every single comparison. Thanks for your comment!
@@versus_com The haziness was repetitive though
Not everyone can be *the boss*
@@kilovwdude6457 e
Love my Pixel 6 Pro ❤
Pixel 6 Pro seemed to have the best shots on most of these images. I have the Pixel 6 Pro and I have yet to find a phone that takes better still photography than the P6Pro, not even the iPhone 13 Pro Max. iPhone 13 Pro Max does have better video though, but I feel that will change with the Pixel 7 Pro since Google paid specific attention to upgrading the video processing capabilities on the Tensor2 SOC.
You won't find a better camera phone.
The 6 pro whipes the floor with the iPhone 14 Pro.
Pixel 7 pro is gonna be a beast.
@@MU-we8hz Not really and I like the 6 Pro a lot.
Samsung's main sensor resolution is going up and their video quality is going down.
Pretty much expected results.
Broo that Vivo is too good in low light
The comparision s we have been waiting for 👍
Chinese companies are doing damn good in camera department. ..but lacking in software department
All mentioned phones are great with outstanding camera performance. Pick any and you are not going to regret.
Happy owner of Pixel 6 Pro (moved from iphone 11) 😁.
This channel deserves millions of subscribers. Good job
With Sammy device, you should always mentioned if it's Exynos or Snapdragon at the start
3:10 Sorry, but that's not true. Google outperforms Vivo's tele camera partly due to the hardware. Both periscope cameras deliver about the same number of sensor pixels per angle, but Vivo's periscope camera has an effective diameter of 3.5mm, whereas Google has 5.4mm. This leads to noticeably less diffraction and diffraction is relevant for Vivo's periscope camera.
The larger effective diameter and higher focal length of Google's periscope (19mm vs 11.8mm) also lead to more light from objects, this leads to a better signal to noise ratio.
I have examined Google's "super res" zoom from the Pixel 6 Pro and sadly, it's really just a marketing stunt. I even tested that traditional digital zoom from a conventional camera with the same number of pixels per angle (as the periscope camera in its 12 megapixel binning mode) and same effective diameter can outperform Google's digital zoom.
Yes, it's possible that Vivo's algorithms are worse than Google's, but this doesn't mean that Google's "super res" zoom actually works. I tested it as I said. It's just a marketing stunt, theory and practice are different things.
Have you tried super res zoom on ported gcam? try it on realme phone with no tele lens and compare the 10x result from stock camera app and ported gcam, you will see a big difference
While I do agree with you about the diameter of the camera being a factor, I don't agree with Super Res Zoom being a useless marketing stunt. You could say that the algorithm is worse or better for any camera phone on the market to justify a result, but I find it hard to ignore when they are pretty transparent with the research and development they've put into this feature that they first implemented in the Pixel 3. There are quite a few people that have tested it and had the exact opposite opinion as you, so having tested it doesn't really prove anything to be the ultimate truth in the end. Here's a reference for details, with live examples comparing the Pixel 2 to the Pixel 3 with Super Res Zoom:
ai.googleblog.com/2018/10/see-better-and-further-with-super-res.html
I think pixie 6 pro is the best
Perfect camera comparison review
Vivo x80 pro worth it
Thanks love from India.
Well it's better for google to have a" good camera", because it's all that it has.
1.Bizarre and repulsive design
2.30% weaker processor
3.Shitty battery life
4.Horrible charging time
5.Abominable packaging
(I mean, NO CHARGER or anything?!)
6.Suicidal depreciation.....
Really, a phone worth every cent..... right!
Better buy some decent SLR..... AND a decent phone (and still save some money).
Was the S22U Exynos or Snapdragon?
Eyxnos. We are in Europe.
How about their OS? Could you do a full comparison of these phone? Thank you, I appreciate it !
The main problem of the pixel's camera is it's lens. It's pick up much noice to notice on video. If google Collab with ziess it will be way better.
Vivo X80 Pro in Zeiss mode vs Xperia 1 iv would interesting.
Google pixel has been on a great trajectory lately. It will soon replace samsung as the Android king.
This they google lost market share, so probably not
With the availability in only 6 countries? As long as that is the case, they will never.
@@OXIR I didn't mean in sales but rather in form
@@Mouton373 they actually gained market share with the pixel 6 series.
In my opinion, the Vivo X60 that wins the photography is more natural when it comes to objects that compliment
does the front cam shoot 4k...specs say yes but i havent seen a review
Such a great and fair comparison.... Well-done
Pixel is hands down the standard of photography.
Great one mate 👌
Thanks ✌️
Google pixel camera 😍😍😍❤️❤️
I prefer Vivo because the result ready to upload on my social media.
My comparison was better lol! great video guys.
Hahaha thanks man!
@@versus_com utterly confused as to how you don't have over a million subscribers!! Your content is so clean and concise. Some other channels with a million sine are awful lol
I can't wait to hit 2k subs haha
You'll get there soon! We work with a team of editors, so we have more opportunities to make the content this clean. Thanks!
@@versus_com well, if you are ever looking to expand the team... would love to create a versus video for you one day 👍
Could you do a review that involved more than point and shoot evaluation. These phones are capable of so much more.
Does this s22 ultra have Exynos?
Unfortunately. 😅
Really looky forward to see Xiaomi 12S ultra's camera comparison
Same!
I m watching the video 240p 😂😂😂 nothing to say
Nice Comparison.
watching on my vivo X80.
Enjoy it! 🥰
King of photography Vivo x 80 pro ❤️
Was this snap on June patch
Love my VivoX80PRO!!!!
Now you are at 100 k subscribers!
Congratulations!
💐🥂🍾🌻🌺
1:27 What do I think about daylight photos with the main camera? Samsung doesn't have a chance against Vivo and Google (and I'm a Samsung fanboy)!
I think they're all really good, but the Pixel is usually the winner of the photo category!
Everyone is really good but i feel Pixel is the best 💯
Great video loved it! 🤩
Video watched on my Pixel 6 PRO
Very good reviuw, new sub here
Thanks for the sub!
Vivo and Xiaomi should merge bring best of their cameras together
8:20 samsung is the winner. much more brigther
by next year it will be very very difficult to choose a camera leader in the android space
You are so underated... You deserve 1 million and so on...
loved bro
you're review
Thanks a ton
1 Google 2 Vivo 3 Samsung
Hi, what chip does s22 have in this video
Vivo is Best
I think you forget to mention the detail on samsung's pic @2:07 you said Samsung's pics r darker, i think it's not dark but cooler tone, but the detail on ur face is better, you can see the lines on ur face r more pronounce.
THANKS 🙏.... KEEP MAKING VIDEOS LIKE THIS, ONE LOVE ♥️
Upon listening to the comments on the portrait pics, I kind of lost interest as clearly the pictures on the Vivo were the worst of the three!
Yer mate macro again . But has the other got long exposure and action pan ???? So how can you take points of when its got something the others hasnt mmm no point in it 🤔
he didn't mention night portraits or lens flares with neon lights , also the cinematic video
Action pan is a really cool feature, you're right! The reason we can't get into detail into all of these features is that the videos would be extremely long, and it's not possible to compare two different features on different phones because this is a fixed category camera comparison. Thanks for your comment!
@@versus_com granted mate 👌 but when we know the pixel doesnt have a macro. No point bringing it up as it has another' two tricks up it sleeve lol or call it a draw. I used to have a pixel 6 pro. Now i have the samy s22 let me say i miss my pixel for some pictures. See samsung still so fussy with portrait s ie stand 1. Meter back etc grr so annoying. Were pixel any distance take and boom sorted . Its the little things. Like when you zoom in on pixel 50mp pictures it holds more detail . Samy with its 50mp doesn't .))
Question is which one is not overheating as snapdragon is on all 3 models. 🤔
Why didn't you mention the vivo gimbal stabilisation horizon level mode
Nothing beats pixel
Hi vs I am your big fan bro and your vedio quality is just fantastic I thing the monster is monster
😈😈 GALACY S22 ULTRA
You really gave portrait to Vivo? lmao. Its clear you dont take colour accuracy into consideration for these tests. And it feels like your narrating to a completely different picture that youre showing. The vivo was so hazy, especially in portrait mode. And Samsung video straight up looked better than Google's not to mention when you showed the 8k footage of the boat.
The first two Portrait photos of the Galaxy, as well as the one on 2:00 look off to me because of the lack of focus, to be honest. It's interesting to me how you didn't have an issue with those photos. And also about 'color accuracy', my shirt is white as day, but half the time it looks blue on the Galaxy, and even darker blue on the Pixel - so we do take it into consideration.
Since we take a lot of footage, we try to review them as a whole - and time to time talk about individual photos if there are big and consistent issues or certain traits. I'm not narrating every single photo as we pass by, but we often show a photo if I'm talking specifically about that image.
Pause the video at 3:28 and 3:34, and you can better see the loss of detail on the side of Samsung. If we were to take 100 videos, I'm pretty sure Samsung would have the best overall videos - but sometimes, phones perform differently in different conditions. The ultrawide video is also too dark, with the least amount of detail out of the three.
I hope these explanations helped you understand our thought process!
Nice comparision bro when i will ei the giveaway🙂
Google is better and consistent
Vivo is killing since x70 series
I am confused between google and vivo..which one to buy?
Hey, just a heads up. You can't rank phones and say which one is better by subjective means.
Thanks for this kind of reviews, Pixel is sooo much better than all of the phones on the market!!
Thanks for your comment!
It depends on so many things. Hard to say that's true.
Versus#1💥💥 Ravi Bhai full support 👍🙏 vivo x80 nice device bro ❤️🤩🤩🙌🙌 big fan bro ❤️ guys like share bhai ko full support 🙏🙏🙏🙏
❤️
Thank you so much sir ❤️☺️☺️👍
The video shooting being in only 1 place and being still didn't impress me to be honest. We need to see samples in different environments and lighting conditions to see how they actually perform most of the time. And movement, of course. Because exposure control is important and I hate when a phone cannot control the exposure well in a video just because it saw a bright spot.
What about the Mi 12S Ultra?
U need to test the HDR in daytime shots. With Extreme HDR situation, Vivo will come on top.
The overall best in my opinion.
1)Vivo
2)Pixel
3)Samsung
The day time and night time stills are way more important than the other categories and Vivo did well in these two major categories.
thanks for the great comparison , can't we zoom in while macro mode is activated on vivo x80 pro 🤔
It unfortunately doesn't switch to the zoom lens, and stays on the main lens while shooting video.
The night shots , portraits specially at night is what really matters , the night behavior of cameras at night i mean, as all flagships get decent photos in daylight,, thats why i ll give the win to vivo .. the crystal clear night shots with no flares and onspot focusing is unparalleled... I can't think of a situation where i would Zoom for 60x or 20x actually as mostly all of us Zoom to Maximum around 7x to 10x.
for a flagship phone , the Dynamic range and night shots are rhe keypoints thats where i see Vivo Excels,, even at daytime the photos looks with a wide dynamic range and pleasing to the eye.
look at your shirt in @1:15 its blown out with the s22 and its blue on google but the vivo managed to be onspot ... also @1:18 the Dynamic range .. @1.45 @2:01 all of these are superiority of optics in vivo which should be mentioned , these things raise the level of competition and push companies to raise their par and progress , so kudos to vivo for that.
BUT its front facing camera is not on par actually while the Mic noise cancelling is stunning idk how you put it atlast ...
Thanks for your long and detailed comment! About the mic quality - the problem wasn't the noise cancelling, but the general quality of the sound. It doesn't sound as clean as the other two.
You should review the Xiaomi 12 ultra with a 1 inch sensor. Came out today in China
and it sucks
@@floxshuilee1760 yeah I know I saw Mr. Who's the boss video
1:58 Pixel's portrait mode is really wonky.
Wow..very helps me..
Glad to hear that!
I thought that the vivo was the only phone currently available with the new Samsung sensor.
With the comparison of night shots which phone was fastest in taking, and processing, a photo?
There were no noticeable differences, around half a second each. Sometimes they took 2-3 seconds if the software got involved, and around 7 seconds in the photo under the bridge where there was zero light.
@@versus_com So the benefits claimed for the V1+ imaging chip proved to be non apparent?
Vivo takes the cake for me here
Vivo
Pixel photos win all the way , hdr,exposure,contrast all on point.. not too much and not too less.. just nice.. love my pixel 6 pro
I think Vivo had gimbal stabilization 🙄
It seems u have the exynos version of the S22 ultra
Xiaomi 12s ultra, can you review it ?
As soon as we get it!
You don't do test camera withaut new models huawei or honor
We compared them as well! Just croll thrrough our video section and you are going to find what you need :)
Excellent All
Request Xiaomi 12S Ultra x Leica
Will try!
Beautiful comparison, good video!
Glad you liked it!
shame on Samsung for this horribe photo quality! the people in the photos look like they are about to die . fck on the sharpness at 100x nobody needs this. but that is the reason why more and more people switch to other companys
I'll go for vivo
have you got the Mi 12s Ultra?
It's not out yet!
@@versus_com 😂
Nice comparison "footballer"
Next time please add more night shot comparison of all 3 phones . Vivo is fantastic in Night
This was already a lot of footage, but we'll try!
Most of people take pictures in motion, why is there no review of pictures being taken in motion or moving subjects?
i thought the x80 pro seemed to have film on them, note quite sure the slow motion comparison was fair, but its all subjective