Étrangement Mats Wilander n'était plus vraiment à son aise sur terre battue en 1988,quand il a gagné Roland Garros pour la 3ème fois..son parcours fut pour le moins chaotique..5 sets contre Zivojinovic, 4 contre Émilo Sanchez, 5 contre le tout jeune Agassi, avant de bénéficier de la peur de Leconte en finale...des résultats catastrophiques à monte carlo et à Rome...le ciment était devenu sa meilleure surface depuis l'USOPEN 87....il suffit de regarder ses résultats impressionnants sur dur de septembre 87 à septembre 88
It is amazing that Wilander beat Agassi with the same tennis at the French Open in 1988, although Agassi was better in every single stroke. Wilander's forehand and backhand were so slow that he couldn't hit winners with them. Nevertheless, he won against Agassi, Becker, Edberg and Lendl and became No. 1 in the world in 1988. Wilander's great strength was playing from the defensive, his physical toughness and mental strength.
They are definitely not hitting the ball as hard as they can. They are both purposely dinking the ball and waiting for the error. I remember a tournament where in the final I just hit the ball high and slow over the net into the middle of the court. I won, but many of the spectators thought it was crazy. Yet the local pro who put on the tournament complimented me afterwards saying: "Smart play."
Wilander was only 17 here, the youngest man to win a slam at the time. He really broadened his game and managed to win the Australian open on grass the following year. He's the only man to win 4 grand slams in his teens.
Not exactly. He won 2 Grand Slams in his teens: French Open 1982 (17 years) and Australian Open 1983 (19 years). When he won the Australian Open 1984 he was 20 years old and also at his 2nd French Open title 1985.
@@christianoscarsson3778 Actually just 1: Australian Open 1985 when he was 19 years of age and just under 20. He won the Grand Slam in the Junior competition in 1983, when he was just 17.
Many thanks for share!, as a fan of Vilas I´m looking for the complete match against Nastase in the Masters of Melbourne, 1974, but without luck til today...
@@jeromelevillain9301 Hi!, please see what I founded 2 days ago: th-cam.com/video/1AlKouQzyA4/w-d-xo.html I think this 22´would be the content of your VHS video, thank you for your offer!
You can not compare rackets now spit balls like missiles , materials have completely changed , once they asked Rod Laver for this and he said I would like to see the new guys play with our old rackets , these are two genuine champions , and I have no doubt they would have been too in case they had been born 40 years later
@andreasmissiroli this is due Wilander. He was hitting no pace moonballs on purpose. And Vilas decided to do the same. They can both hit harder than this.
Guillermo Vilas a inventé le gran willy, c'est à dire, le coup entre les jambes Et il a été le meilleur de tous en smashe de revers, le coup le plus dur du tennis... et puis, il était poète : "Un enfant fit un puits dans le sable Avec désir insensé de changer la mer de place J'ai commencé à rire puis je me suis arrêté J'ai su qu'il avait grandi" Guillermo Vilas
I think I remember reading somewhere that Wilander said years later that he felt vilas was really affected by pressure and nerves here. Wilander was only 17 and everyone felt he should have no chance against vilas, and that seems to have piled the pressure on vilas.
The 12 year age gap added to the challenge Vilas faced in this final. Vilas had a resurgence at age 30, trying to recapture the same magic of the '77 season when he won 15 tournaments, two slams (one being his lone French Open title) and finishing I think#2 for the year, although, in terms of slams won, he should have been crowned #1. The year end championship, known in those says as the Colgate Grand Prix, Vilas fell in the semis to his nemesis, the legendary Borg, who would lose to Connors in the final. Oddly enough, Vilas had beaten Connors earlier in the round robin tournament in three sets, in front of a record MSG crowd, duplicating his US Open win. Vilas would officially finish #2 for the season. In this match, the turning point was when Vilas was serving for the second set, already up one set, he misses an easy overhead, normally his bread and butter shot, ends up losing the set in a tie-break, and the momentum changed at that point, and the young Swede sensed a tiring Vilas, moon balled him to death. Tennis sure has changed since '82 in terms of shotmaking. It's not even the same game anymore.
Many may think that heavy topspin is characteristic of modern tennis, with light racquets and poli strings. Wrong! This was the mind numbing backcourt, topspin fests of the 80s. Started by Bjorn Borg and Guillermo Vilas, Mats Wilander was a prominent example of this style of play. Lacking powerful strokes, but being blessed with great speed and stamina, Wilander could keep that ball in play until the cows came home, or the opponent's arm almost fell off, like here in the case of Vilas, who is receiving a overdose of his own medicine. Players like McEnroe were a refreshing exception. Even Lendl, when he dialed in the power, fell into these endless borefests. Thank God for players like Becker and Edberg, that kept things interesting.
I agree, this match was unwatchable. I remember the late BBC tennis commentator Max Robertson saying of Borg: " No one is harder to beat on clay...or more boring to watch."
Racket and string technology has ruined tennis in my opinion. Today its all about pace. I wish they would limmit the strings and racket size to old standards and make them use wood rackets only. Would be much more fun to watch.
I think Djokovic hit that 2020 QF US Open ball harder (by accident of course) to that line umpire than either Wilander or Vilas at any point in that 82 final...
Exactly. Guillermo always said that to beat your opponent you must first get into his brain and make him understand that whatever he did, he couldn't beat you. Too bad a "17-year-old brat" appeared here and beat him.
Cheee, parece que están peloteando !!! Increíble. Creo que voy un domingo luego de echarme 8 fierros en el pernocte y los pongo 6/2 6/0 .... olvídateeee
Eran otros tiempos. Peores materiales, los jugadores no tenían una legión de entrenadores y preparadores como si existe hoy en día, que todo está súper profesionalizado. Pero estos tenistas, hoy en día hubieran sido igual de buenos que los de ahora. Que a nadie le quepa la menor duda. Y por cierto; en aquellas épocas, existían los especialistas en cada superficie, que era complicadisimo ganarles y te mandaban para casa, te llamases como te llamases. Dese hace más de 20 años, todo el mundo juega igual. Es muy aburrido. De esta forma, el bueno gana mucho más y domina mucho más al resto
What a boring game - what they were doing there, exercises? I'd just looked before the game between Lendl and Clerc , the French Open half final of 81. This was really good tennis to compare with this stuff here....
I'm of the opinion that the rackets they used then had nowhere near the power of todays rackets....thus the primary reason for the very slow play at times.....but I have to think the balls were pretty lame then too? Were the courts dialed back for slowness as well? Anyone?
Jamás le pudo haber afectado eso a un profesional como G.V. Jugó demasiado conservador, debería haber arriesgado mucho más contra un tipo diez veces más conservador que el que arriesgó un poco más en el cuarto set. A globitos obvio no le iba a ganar nunca a Willander!
@@fermac2779 Recuerdo que cuando se había separado estaba muy mal anímicamente. Concretamente, lo había afectado. Con respecto a que jugo demasiado conservador, absolutamente. Lamentablemente tuvo un desempeño muy flojo, de lo peor que he visto en el. Prácticamente se limito a poner la pelota en juego sin haber intentado variantes.
O sea que se separó de Carolina antes de la final? O antes del RG 1982? Seria algo así como la excusa de Agassi y su peluca en la final contra Gomez en el RG1990.
@@madmax5144 No es una excusa. Es sentido común. Si tenes una conexión afectiva que consideras importante en tu vida y pasas a perderla, te afecta. Pasas por un periodo de duelo. Por lo menos así le pasa a los humanos saludables mental y emocionalmente.
Vilas un maestro y el otro tipo no evisto en la historia del tenis un jugador mas raton q este tipo juega a pasar la bola y q dentre en la cancha esos eran sus argumento y esperar q su ribal cometa errores le asia flaco fabor a este deporte y q decir para el espectaculo y inesplicable mente llego a numero uno duro un suspiro y es el menos recordado d los numero uno x lo pobre d sus argumentos tenisticos
Incroyable toutes ces balles lentes à 2 m au dessus du filet...! On dirait des débutants... C'est tellement moins intéressant qu'un match à la même époque entre Navratilova et Evert Loyd.
@@emmanueldemaqueron8361 D'accord Wilander a été un grand champion, mais là contre Vilas cela n'a pas été un jeu intéressant. Et pour ce qui est de la tactique les joueurs des décennies suivantes en ont autant eu.
Ce match a été particulièrement lent en effet. Wilander a gagné ce Roland-Garros en jouant comme ça, des balles très lentes et très hautes qui ont tué physiquement tous ses adversaires. C'est étonnant que Lendl, Clerc ou Vilas n'aient pas réussi à surmonter ça, en particulier Vilas, qui, cette année là, pratiquait un tennis plutôt offensif. Je crois que Tiriac a complètement raté son approche stratégique du match, il fallait agresser Wilander et non pas rentrer dans son jeu, Vilas ayant 13 ans de plus que lui ... Vilas a quand même été très malchanceux en ratant une balle de second set à quelques millimètres car il aurait sûrement gagné en menant deux sets à 0. Et enfin, même si c'est lent, la technique du lift des deux côtés est absolument hallucinante !
@Lydon Mika Moi aussi je préfère de loin le tennis des années 70-80 à celui d'aujourd'hui. Joueurs plus charismatiques, oppositions de style plus marquées ... Pour en revenir à cette finale, c'est facile à dire effectivement que Vilas aurait dû attaquer. Mais quand même, vu la température sur le court et la différence d'âge, c'était gonflé de jouer uniquement sur l'endurance ... Vilas était sans doute trop confiant parce qu'il avait battu Wilander à Madrid quelques semaines plus tôt. Mais là il n'aurait pas dû prendre le risque de trop miser sur l'échange. Cette année là, il volleyait pas mal, et d'ailleurs dans la première partie du match, il a gagné presque tous les points où il est monté. Mais il ne l'a pas fait assez, il a trop attendu. Cela dit encore une fois il est vraiment malchanceux dans le tie-break aussi ...
Pasaron 40 años, es obvio que iba a haber esa diferencia. Igual hay que decir que siguen jugando mejor que el aburrimiento de las mujeres en la actualidad.
Que partido más malo, Vilas no sabía sacar, solo la ponía en juego, muy lento. Esta debe ser la peor final de Rolland Garros de la historia, ambos parecían jugadores de fin de semana
Yes, Vilas had a bad tactics. Il think Tiriac prepared this final very badly, because Vilas should have won easily. He was unlucky too, because he had a set point in the tie-break (almost a match point).
effectivement ! quand on compare avec le tennis d'aujourd'hui , cela n'a plus rien a voir!. il est vrai que les raquettes ont du évoluer...mais tout de même!
I could not agree more with your comment. These so called experts commenting don’t have a clue about the game and that these guys played the majority of their tennis growing up with the smaller wooden rackets. They don’t even consider the evolution of the game and it how it has changed. Thanks for your comment!!
@@MultiStar83 I am a fan of mats and also u because u have put lot of mats matches. Few realize how intelling mats was. He had strategies to beat player and his 1985 style was already more aggressive with lot of volleys vs lendl in final. He evolved and achieved a lot without brutal power, hail mats
what tactics? no drop shots, no inside out forehands , no maneuvering the other guy around to create open court space, almost no slices or different kinds of shots, very boring, way too slow paced
Wilander was only 17 here, at the time the youngest man to ever win a grand slam. He won it the hard way. He also broadened his game in later years and became a very good volleyer.
@@germaintet7648 oui Wilander a été héroïque pendant ce Roland Garros 82..j'aurais préféré que Vilas l'emporte,eut égard à son hiver printemps 82 absolument remarquable...mais voilà c'est Wilander qui a battu Vilas et c'est indiscutable...
Yes, and it also gives me the feeling that your son knows more about tennis than you. PS: In case you didn't realize, tennis in those days was played more slowly and thinking about where to put the ball. Not like now that everything is hitting the ball hard. Tennis today is bullshit.
Mats was a real talent. He improved his serve and added a net game. Won slams on faster courts too.
Étrangement Mats Wilander n'était plus vraiment à son aise sur terre battue en 1988,quand il a gagné Roland Garros pour la 3ème fois..son parcours fut pour le moins chaotique..5 sets contre Zivojinovic, 4 contre Émilo Sanchez, 5 contre le tout jeune Agassi, avant de bénéficier de la peur de Leconte en finale...des résultats catastrophiques à monte carlo et à Rome...le ciment était devenu sa meilleure surface depuis l'USOPEN 87....il suffit de regarder ses résultats impressionnants sur dur de septembre 87 à septembre 88
And Vilas past his prime here.
It is amazing that Wilander beat Agassi with the same tennis at the French Open in 1988, although Agassi was better in every single stroke. Wilander's forehand and backhand were so slow that he couldn't hit winners with them. Nevertheless, he won against Agassi, Becker, Edberg and Lendl and became No. 1 in the world in 1988.
Wilander's great strength was playing from the defensive, his physical toughness and mental strength.
compared to the speed of today's tennis, this seems like they were warming up.
They are definitely not hitting the ball as hard as they can. They are both purposely dinking the ball and waiting for the error.
I remember a tournament where in the final I just hit the ball high and slow over the net into the middle of the court.
I won, but many of the spectators thought it was crazy. Yet the local pro who put on the tournament complimented me afterwards saying: "Smart play."
Racket technology improvement. But try playing with a wooden racket. Not as easy as it seems.
Even a warming up between girls is more intense today !
That second point almost solely consisted of slow lobs!
Wilander was only 17 here, the youngest man to win a slam at the time. He really broadened his game and managed to win the Australian open on grass the following year. He's the only man to win 4 grand slams in his teens.
Not exactly. He won 2 Grand Slams in his teens: French Open 1982 (17 years) and Australian Open 1983 (19 years). When he won the Australian Open 1984 he was 20 years old and also at his 2nd French Open title 1985.
@@MultiStar83 Edberg won 4 grand slams in his teens.
@@christianoscarsson3778 Actually just 1: Australian Open 1985 when he was 19 years of age and just under 20. He won the Grand Slam in the Junior competition in 1983, when he was just 17.
Many thanks for share!, as a fan of Vilas I´m looking for the complete match against Nastase in the Masters of Melbourne, 1974, but without luck til today...
Hello i have the last 2 sets of Vilas-Nastase masters 74
@@jeromelevillain9301 Woooow!!, thanks!, great to hear that, I thought that it didn´t exist, how could I get that video?, sorry for my english!
@@jeromelevillain9301 Please, I would like to see at least the final set, where did you find the video?, where can I to buy it?, thanks in advance!
@@argie2854 Hi i have the last 2 sets on VHS record. I try to convert on dvd.
@@jeromelevillain9301 Hi!, please see what I founded 2 days ago: th-cam.com/video/1AlKouQzyA4/w-d-xo.html
I think this 22´would be the content of your VHS video, thank you for your offer!
It looks like Vilas was having trouble staying awake in some of those rallies.
To jest jakiś mecz pokazowy? O_o
In comparison with todays tennis I looks like cake and tea Saturday afternoon enjoyment........
Yes, and I am wondering, how far you get with this moonballing today?
I was thinking women's tennis as well. They hit it harder now.
You can not compare rackets now spit balls like missiles , materials have completely changed , once they asked Rod Laver for this and he said I would like to see the new guys play with our old rackets , these are two genuine champions , and I have no doubt they would have been too in case they had been born 40 years later
@andreasmissiroli this is due Wilander. He was hitting no pace moonballs on purpose. And Vilas decided to do the same. They can both hit harder than this.
What a cure for insomnia...
Vilas ! Vilas ! Vilas !
Wilander Wilander Wilander
Je préfère Vilas à Wilander
Guillermo Vilas a inventé le gran willy, c'est à dire, le coup entre les jambes Et il a été le meilleur de tous en smashe de revers, le coup le plus dur du tennis... et puis, il était poète :
"Un enfant fit un puits dans le sable
Avec désir insensé de changer la mer de place
J'ai commencé à rire puis je me suis arrêté
J'ai su qu'il avait grandi"
Guillermo Vilas
What was Vilas thinking in this match?Was he injured and didn’t tell anybody?
I think I remember reading somewhere that Wilander said years later that he felt vilas was really affected by pressure and nerves here. Wilander was only 17 and everyone felt he should have no chance against vilas, and that seems to have piled the pressure on vilas.
The 12 year age gap added to the challenge Vilas faced in this final. Vilas had a resurgence at age 30, trying to recapture the same magic of the '77 season when he won 15 tournaments, two slams (one being his lone French Open title) and finishing I think#2 for the year, although, in terms of slams won, he should have been crowned #1. The year end championship, known in those says as the Colgate Grand Prix, Vilas fell in the semis to his nemesis, the legendary Borg, who would lose to Connors in the final. Oddly enough, Vilas had beaten Connors earlier in the round robin tournament in three sets, in front of a record MSG crowd, duplicating his US Open win. Vilas would officially finish #2 for the season. In this match, the turning point was when Vilas was serving for the second set, already up one set, he misses an easy overhead, normally his bread and butter shot, ends up losing the set in a tie-break, and the momentum changed at that point, and the young Swede sensed a tiring Vilas, moon balled him to death. Tennis sure has changed since '82 in terms of shotmaking. It's not even the same game anymore.
For sure not the same game. But it's interesting to see that the lethal tennis brain of Mr Wilander was on place in such a young age.
Many may think that heavy topspin is characteristic of modern tennis, with light racquets and poli strings.
Wrong!
This was the mind numbing backcourt, topspin fests of the 80s.
Started by Bjorn Borg and Guillermo Vilas, Mats Wilander was a prominent example of this style of play. Lacking powerful strokes, but being blessed with great speed and stamina, Wilander could keep that ball in play until the cows came home, or the opponent's arm almost fell off, like here in the case of Vilas, who is receiving a overdose of his own medicine.
Players like McEnroe were a refreshing exception.
Even Lendl, when he dialed in the power, fell into these endless borefests.
Thank God for players like Becker and Edberg, that kept things interesting.
I agree, this match was unwatchable.
I remember the late BBC tennis commentator Max Robertson saying of Borg: " No one is harder to beat on clay...or more boring to watch."
@@martydav9475 The Vilas Borg match in 78 is much more intense than this..
Lol, Becker and Edberg cant compare to the legends you call ''boring''😂
if there was ever a steroid era in tennis, I’ll assume it wasn’t during 1982.
Racket and string technology has ruined tennis in my opinion. Today its all about pace. I wish they would limmit the strings and racket size to old standards and make them use wood rackets only. Would be much more fun to watch.
Hablan de las raquetas y es cierto, pero la postura corporal, la actitud, están a años luz de hoy en día.
the Italian word for such players was "pallettari"
Were spectators reimbursed?
I think Djokovic hit that 2020 QF US Open ball harder (by accident of course) to that line umpire than either Wilander or Vilas at any point in that 82 final...
Vilas interpretation of Ali's Rope a Dope, Trying to get inside Wilander's head
Exactly. Guillermo always said that to beat your opponent you must first get into his brain and make him understand that whatever he did, he couldn't beat you. Too bad a "17-year-old brat" appeared here and beat him.
It’s like how players warm up these days 😁 these guys would not have much chance today given the pace and quality of game these days
In fairness to Wilander, he really did broaden his game. He won two grand slams on grass at the Australian open by learning how to attack and volley.
Matt's married a South African beauty Sonja.......
Oui le beau Wilander
Carolina de Mónaco was girlfriend of Vilas
VILAS for ever!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vilas méritait de remporter Roland garros face à Wilander
Cheee, parece que están peloteando !!! Increíble. Creo que voy un domingo luego de echarme 8 fierros en el pernocte y los pongo 6/2 6/0 .... olvídateeee
LOL , they hit like practice speed! Are you serious!!!??? Compare to how Thiem or the other guys hit it now! LOL
Wilander imperméable à la pression.
Mythique
a coffee please.....
Other time tennis... Different, but It was the best at that time
Ovaj tenis je smijesan igraci do 2000tih djokovicu nadalu i federeru ne bi mogli uzeti ni gejm!!!!!
Eran otros tiempos. Peores materiales, los jugadores no tenían una legión de entrenadores y preparadores como si existe hoy en día, que todo está súper profesionalizado. Pero estos tenistas, hoy en día hubieran sido igual de buenos que los de ahora. Que a nadie le quepa la menor duda. Y por cierto; en aquellas épocas, existían los especialistas en cada superficie, que era complicadisimo ganarles y te mandaban para casa, te llamases como te llamases. Dese hace más de 20 años, todo el mundo juega igual. Es muy aburrido. De esta forma, el bueno gana mucho más y domina mucho más al resto
What a boring game - what they were doing there, exercises? I'd just looked before the game between Lendl and Clerc , the French Open half final of 81. This was really good tennis to compare with this stuff here....
I'm of the opinion that the rackets they used then had nowhere near the power of todays rackets....thus the primary reason for the very slow play at times.....but I have to think the balls were pretty lame then too? Were the courts dialed back for slowness as well? Anyone?
Creo que Vilas se había separado de Carolina en ese momento, muy probablemente afectando su desempeño.
Jamás le pudo haber afectado eso a un profesional como G.V. Jugó demasiado conservador, debería haber arriesgado mucho más contra un tipo diez veces más conservador que el que arriesgó un poco más en el cuarto set. A globitos obvio no le iba a ganar nunca a Willander!
@@fermac2779 Recuerdo que cuando se había separado estaba muy mal anímicamente. Concretamente, lo había afectado.
Con respecto a que jugo demasiado conservador, absolutamente. Lamentablemente tuvo un desempeño muy flojo, de lo peor que he visto en el. Prácticamente se limito a poner la pelota en juego sin haber intentado variantes.
@@The7dioses si la causa fuera Carolina lo entiendo....minon de minones, pero quien le quita lo bailado. Saludos
O sea que se separó de Carolina antes de la final? O antes del RG 1982? Seria algo así como la excusa de Agassi y su peluca en la final contra Gomez en el RG1990.
@@madmax5144 No es una excusa. Es sentido común. Si tenes una conexión afectiva que consideras importante en tu vida y pasas a perderla, te afecta. Pasas por un periodo de duelo. Por lo menos así le pasa a los humanos saludables mental y emocionalmente.
Vilas un maestro y el otro tipo no evisto en la historia del tenis un jugador mas raton q este tipo juega a pasar la bola y q dentre en la cancha esos eran sus argumento y esperar q su ribal cometa errores le asia flaco fabor a este deporte y q decir para el espectaculo y inesplicable mente llego a numero uno duro un suspiro y es el menos recordado d los numero uno x lo pobre d sus argumentos tenisticos
Komedi 😂😂😂😂
Incroyable toutes ces balles lentes à 2 m au dessus du filet...! On dirait des débutants... C'est tellement moins intéressant qu'un match à la même époque entre Navratilova et Evert Loyd.
@@emmanueldemaqueron8361 D'accord Wilander a été un grand champion, mais là contre Vilas cela n'a pas été un jeu intéressant. Et pour ce qui est de la tactique les joueurs des décennies suivantes en ont autant eu.
Ce match a été particulièrement lent en effet. Wilander a gagné ce Roland-Garros en jouant comme ça, des balles très lentes et très hautes qui ont tué physiquement tous ses adversaires. C'est étonnant que Lendl, Clerc ou Vilas n'aient pas réussi à surmonter ça, en particulier Vilas, qui, cette année là, pratiquait un tennis plutôt offensif. Je crois que Tiriac a complètement raté son approche stratégique du match, il fallait agresser Wilander et non pas rentrer dans son jeu, Vilas ayant 13 ans de plus que lui ... Vilas a quand même été très malchanceux en ratant une balle de second set à quelques millimètres car il aurait sûrement gagné en menant deux sets à 0. Et enfin, même si c'est lent, la technique du lift des deux côtés est absolument hallucinante !
Je préfère ça que un Nadal/Djokovic.
@Lydon Mika Moi aussi je préfère de loin le tennis des années 70-80 à celui d'aujourd'hui. Joueurs plus charismatiques, oppositions de style plus marquées ... Pour en revenir à cette finale, c'est facile à dire effectivement que Vilas aurait dû attaquer. Mais quand même, vu la température sur le court et la différence d'âge, c'était gonflé de jouer uniquement sur l'endurance ... Vilas était sans doute trop confiant parce qu'il avait battu Wilander à Madrid quelques semaines plus tôt. Mais là il n'aurait pas dû prendre le risque de trop miser sur l'échange. Cette année là, il volleyait pas mal, et d'ailleurs dans la première partie du match, il a gagné presque tous les points où il est monté. Mais il ne l'a pas fait assez, il a trop attendu. Cela dit encore une fois il est vraiment malchanceux dans le tie-break aussi ...
I don't know why Vilas never gets credit for winning Wimbledon. He did - 1979 - against Chris Christensen. I saw it.
Vilas never won Wimbledon !
@@giseleigoa4941 Didn't he, Gisele? Didn't he?...
@@giseleigoa4941 th-cam.com/video/tgqbLAzJDpw/w-d-xo.html @ 9:37
@@uncletony6210 Never, and I never heard of a player named Chris Christensen. Borg won in '79, as well as '76, '77, '78, 7 '80.
@@giseleigoa4941 watch the link at 9:37 and you will see that you are wrong.
Puros globitos, no arriesgan. El saque de Vilas muy malo---
Pasaron 40 años, es obvio que iba a haber esa diferencia. Igual hay que decir que siguen jugando mejor que el aburrimiento de las mujeres en la actualidad.
I think in this tournament Wilander has been te shame of tennis
Que partido más malo, Vilas no sabía sacar, solo la ponía en juego, muy lento. Esta debe ser la peor final de Rolland Garros de la historia, ambos parecían jugadores de fin de semana
Yes, Vilas had a bad tactics. Il think Tiriac prepared this final very badly, because Vilas should have won easily. He was unlucky too, because he had a set point in the tie-break (almost a match point).
meme les juniors jouent mieux
. Rafa could beat them all together at this speed.
Sure but you cant compare!
What the hell is this xD
this looks so low level now. LOLLLLLL
Vi solo los primeros 2 minutos y m aburrí, partido malo, quien la tiraba más alto,mejor era un partido entre conchita Martínez y Arantxa Sánchez!!
V1las.
Quelle lenteur ! 😱
effectivement ! quand on compare avec le tennis d'aujourd'hui , cela n'a plus rien a voir!. il est vrai que les raquettes ont du évoluer...mais tout de même!
I can’t believe the ignorant comments here about the pace.
I could not agree more with your comment. These so called experts commenting don’t have a clue about the game and that these guys played the majority of their tennis growing up with the smaller wooden rackets. They don’t even consider the evolution of the game and it how it has changed. Thanks for your comment!!
こりゃまた、退屈なテニス🎾だなぁ😃
Z Z Z Z Z
The worst tennis of all time. A really joke!!!! They were able to play like that for 24 hours🥱🥱🥱🤮🤮🤮
I do not know what you want? This is just great tennis in my view...;)
@@MultiStar83 I am a fan of mats and also u because u have put lot of mats matches. Few realize how intelling mats was. He had strategies to beat player and his 1985 style was already more aggressive with lot of volleys vs lendl in final. He evolved and achieved a lot without brutal power, hail mats
is this as' joke?..the pace looks like a minor league. You cannot be serious
It's not tennis,it is joke
full shit a this time ...too slow with out any tactic
It was slower, but there were more tactics, I think. Tennis of that time was a bit like chess. Tennis of nowadays is more looking like poker.
what tactics? no drop shots, no inside out forehands , no maneuvering the other guy around to create open court space, almost no slices or different kinds of shots, very boring, way too slow paced
@@52daytripper jestes Polak, Paul ? Mowie troche po Polsku.
tennis of today is more like boxing
Wilander with his anti-tennis. Horrible!
When tennis was a chess game....
Brutally boring
After playing such 3rd class games ,he had the balls to comment on Federer game.
Wilander was only 17 here, at the time the youngest man to ever win a grand slam. He won it the hard way. He also broadened his game in later years and became a very good volleyer.
quelle purge ce match !! l'horreur tennistique absolue..
La faute à ce Wilander
@@leliondescavernes1747 Bien sûr, mais il a gagné, donc c'était la bonne tactique. Au haut niveau, le but est la victoire, pas l'élégance.
@@germaintet7648 oui Wilander a été héroïque pendant ce Roland Garros 82..j'aurais préféré que Vilas l'emporte,eut égard à son hiver printemps 82 absolument remarquable...mais voilà c'est Wilander qui a battu Vilas et c'est indiscutable...
Must be the most boring final ever.
i confirm
How do you play?
My 8 year old plays faster and with more energy than these two
Yes, and it also gives me the feeling that your son knows more about tennis than you.
PS: In case you didn't realize, tennis in those days was played more slowly and thinking about where to put the ball. Not like now that everything is hitting the ball hard. Tennis today is bullshit.