Good evening Robert I so wish I paid more attention to maths back in the day. Your fab way of explaining all this has over a few years now awakened so much for me. Truly grateful. 💜
i wouldn't say anything negative about terence thinking but it would be nice if he could fully explain his theory. now i'm seeing this clip it makes me think that terence didn't do enough research or maybe terence missed on telling us something else as to how he concluded on this results. thanks for this video clip and many respect for you not to bash terence theories
I agree you think this and the thing about math is that sometimes there are calculations with assumptions that are made subconsciously that is the reason for you calculating things they way you do that you don't realize you do, you just know or understand that you did a calculate something in your head. That's the reason math teachers want students to show their work in long form, however for some students this is difficult because they can't articulate exactly how they knew to quickly do the sequence of math to come up with the result. Luckily Robert is good and forensically breaking it down and leading us through the thinking process and calculations, Does that make sense?
@@theblackairbender Yes and who knows, maybe he'll produce his own science fiction movie where he's THE LINCHPIN and he can show off his tech and principles in the movie under the guise of "fiction"
I love your work. I was never great at math but did ok. I have to replay most videos to truly understand. This is ground breaking. They're working on a unified field of physics. This could never be accomplished without math. It's an exciting time to be alive.
Ive been watching you on other channels for a few years and this video made me subscribe to your channel, Grant. Keep up your good work and hopefully i''ll go back to mother Egypt one day too
I feel that this square root of N then cubed then divided by N then square that result gives you the original number, Seems like this is might be the reason we have vortices or perhaps explains the fibonacci sequencing....?
Amazed by REG's patience to prove the obvious ( in this case the Indices Rule for any n ). Great way to introduce the anticipated Polymath calculator! 😀
Yep, when I heard this statement about square root of 2 at video with Terrence Howard, I also tried to check it. I have rewritten it in fractional powers and got that it's basically x^((1/2) * 3 - 1) = x^(1/2). Terrence is a very profound and smart person, but its always better to check your insights with someone else ) to get the view from the other side. P.S. Robert, the calculator is really cool❤
Hi Robert May I ask what you think about Terrance Howard / on philosophy he talks about math gravity etc . He says math is wrong 1 times 1 should make 2 ? 🌸 Oh just looked you have a pod on it I shall watch X
How does one obtain that calculator on your PC, Robert? Digits on the right of the number's mantissa are significant to me and my works. Thank you for the incite about Terrance Howard. He has added some confusion. I cannot throw away man's ability to imagine straight lines, curvature is a creation of man's imperfect senses. Such as; the eye sees in frames per second ( thus curvature or blending ).
in the i-ching you have a dash and no dash. the ying and the yang, before the base 10 decimal system, numbers were calculated using base 2 system. similar to the binary system computers use to calculate today. when you puzzle the i ching 64 hexagram together you get a 3d flower of life :)
(sqrt(n))^3)/n = (n^(3/2))/n = n^(3/2)*n^(-1) = n^(1/2) = sqrt(n) You can solve this very easily analytically. I am a numerical engineer but in such simple cases analytical calculations are very useful :) I also do not agree with Terrence Howard on: straight lines do not occure in nature. Well in fact they do. I am highly fascinated on how crystals are formed. Even salt is made up of straight lines.
@@itoobable haha funny :) I do agree with the fact that our civilisation has way too much focus on straight lines and 90° edges. Curved lines are most of the times more appealing to the eye but way harder to construct.
@@hobolobobolo totally agree :) non conventional materials make constructing with curved lines easier. i've seen some stunning stone and cob structures! also, check out aircrete domes!
@@itoobable that looks really futuristic. I live it AUT and we have some beautiful "Kreuzgewölbe" = "cross vault" I guess? But modern day brick layers dont do it anymore, too time expensive. The looks of it are stunning though. Our forefathers had serious taste and skill!
@@hobolobobolo it appears to translate as 'groin vault' hahha really beautiful! I have a friend who is aiming to build intersecting arches out of brick, very much like this. definitely a dying art which I hope find a revival!
Hey wow, thank you for all the work you put out there to the world, I like how after recent Terrance actions the internet Bombed talking about 100 years old theories, and pushing the initiative for others to go out there and bring their life works to the surface too! recently I follow your works, works of Dougherty, Lori Gardy, Maheran Kesher, and others. For making simulations in Blender geometry nodes with Russel's principles, your Phylomath calculator looks like a gold mine, where can I find Ryan Platform, can you please send me a link ?✌
divide any 0. decimal by the same and no matter what it always equals 1. there are only 9 ‘true’ numbers in the physical universe, so for instance the number 12; it’s true representation is 3. the number 69; it’s true representation is the number 6…. zero is infinity… everything within nothing all at once! 🙏💕🎶
Can abstract this one step further. This is also not unique to cubing the square root. In fact, you can choose any number, n, as the root. Then raise to the power of n + 1. This pattern will show again because after some simplifying of the equation you are really just saying that n + 1 - n = 1. Absolutely nothing mysterious going on here. It’s just complex enough that average person can’t keep up with the math in their head, especially on the spot, so he’s able to hand wave it as though it’s breaking some kind of mathematical laws..
So what is Terrance trying to get at because he’s not dumb or crazy so there has to be a there there somehow. You should have a discussion with him on here
"by two" without limit , by any and every definition possible 1.41421 is even 5,5,3 or through additive reduction 13 or 4 Where have we seen the 13 and 4? We now have the complexity of math before us which as dis-covered expresses all that was re-vealed at Be-ginning!
This individual "life" "live" assisted the material world of plans in terms "building" There is one important tri-set at the foundation of "all building material"3-4-5 "live" by simple gematria is 3-9-4-5 its re-flective numerically is 5-4-9-3 I will not speak the letter re-flective here. Fluke! i have spent the last nine years trying to dis-prove these verities by every imaginable material proof we have in the world of math. I can not! I submit to the indefinable verity of these things which are not the invention of human material mind. These standards were set in place, and the foundation of them is most greatly seen in scripture and especially from Be-ginning. 7 days 1,2, (345) 6,7 is merely one in limitless ways to see it. This particular way expresses a balanced symmetry with a "heart of understanding. if you add these whole parts it is 3,3,4 which are a digital root 1 The 3-3 is the actual offering of 6 from be-ginning. in terms 1/2 Our sun and moon was not presented until Genesis 1-19 The fourth day. 3 days were not understandable by degree of our material comprehension as we see in a twenty four 2 and 4 (6) hour day. ................................................................................................................................................................................ where to stop!!!!!!!!! there is no end to it!!!!!! yet there has been offered all existence a be-ginning in support of understanding "eternal"
0:23 mathewknowles #beyonce #treysmith #jayekingtv Upon God Lord Jesus Christ Is 12: the water a well 13: the vineyard 14: The Land The The plower hill terrain 15: heilman - beholden hell 16: woman's being inside of a whole Below the is Man.5 16: man's being below the female figure.6 17: The highway grounding of mountain terrain 18: the home of temple's {occultation code/19: waring amongst coin (Cesar [heaven] and hell): the war grounds are of Caesar's death 20: the ship of the Egyptian pharaoh's adolescency dead by brimming smotten (_Crete-] 21: upon the everlasting cross of salvation {#White...halo,. #blue..Men of God,. #red.Letters-hallelujah of the saints prophetic-word., #green of atonement upon the holyspirit... J,
TH-cam is playing games with me again on my fire TV and it keeps kicking me off during this video I don't think it's a algorithm thing they just don't want me watching this video not hard to see.
Good move to keep the algebra equation and theory out of the explanations, less people would have had the patience to listen till the end. I hope @joerogan brings you on his show 🙏
and you still haven’t answered terrence’s specific claim that in the number two. the divisor is smaller than cube. weinstein apologizes for the number two calling it special(ed). so i still havent heard a legit refute to th claim. weinstein calls math perfect, but as long as you ignore the special cases
This is all smoke and mirrors. Sq root of n cubed / n is Sq root os n x sq root of n x sq root of n /n = n x sq root of n / n = sq root of n . So all that was done is sq rt of n was multiplied by 1!!!
I just love to listen while I’m cooking, I don’t understand the math but I love how he explains it anyways. And see where it goes. It’s fascinating
Ditto..lol
Haha! Me too. Hoping one day I’ll have an incredible download and it will all click into place! ❤
Im rt there w ya girl❤
@yeah, that would be cool wouldn't it. Hell anything is possible as we can see these days❤ sharonboltondesign
@@michellecardenas6072 🤓
Can't wait for the podcast with Terrence
Glad my suggestion
Went into video
👌 Good content
When is the calculator you made available for use?
Please have Terrance on Think Tank soon 🤲🏼💫
😂😂😂 please 🤦🏾♂️
Thanks!
Good evening Robert
I so wish I paid more attention to maths back in the day.
Your fab way of explaining all this has over a few years now awakened so much for me.
Truly grateful.
💜
i wouldn't say anything negative about terence thinking but it would be nice if he could fully explain his theory.
now i'm seeing this clip it makes me think that terence didn't do enough research or maybe terence missed on telling us something else as to how he concluded on this results.
thanks for this video clip and many respect for you not to bash terence theories
I agree you think this and the thing about math is that sometimes there are calculations with assumptions that are made subconsciously that is the reason for you calculating things they way you do that you don't realize you do, you just know or understand that you did a calculate something in your head. That's the reason math teachers want students to show their work in long form, however for some students this is difficult because they can't articulate exactly how they knew to quickly do the sequence of math to come up with the result. Luckily Robert is good and forensically breaking it down and leading us through the thinking process and calculations, Does that make sense?
He’ll be back in a film soon 😂 watch
@@theblackairbender Yes and who knows, maybe he'll produce his own science fiction movie where he's THE LINCHPIN and he can show off his tech and principles in the movie under the guise of "fiction"
I love your work. I was never great at math but did ok. I have to replay most videos to truly understand. This is ground breaking. They're working on a unified field of physics. This could never be accomplished without math. It's an exciting time to be alive.
On the waitlist for Orion! Excited to check out the calculator!
Yes get with Terrence!❤❤❤
Ive been watching you on other channels for a few years and this video made me subscribe to your channel, Grant. Keep up your good work and hopefully i''ll go back to mother Egypt one day too
Incredible program to be able to meld so many disciplines together. I can’t wait to fiddle around with it! 🎻✨
I feel that this square root of N then cubed then divided by N then square that result gives you the original number, Seems like this is might be the reason we have vortices or perhaps explains the fibonacci sequencing....?
Amazed by REG's patience to prove the obvious ( in this case the Indices Rule for any n ). Great way to introduce the anticipated Polymath calculator! 😀
Yep, when I heard this statement about square root of 2 at video with Terrence Howard, I also tried to check it. I have rewritten it in fractional powers and got that it's basically x^((1/2) * 3 - 1) = x^(1/2). Terrence is a very profound and smart person, but its always better to check your insights with someone else ) to get the view from the other side. P.S. Robert, the calculator is really cool❤
Is that calculator available?
I would love to see Robert have a discussion with Terrance Howard
I was so excited when I heard " Flower of Life "❤
Watching from Mzuzu , Malawi
I'm curious about the pendant you're wearing. Would you tell me what it's made of?
That’s exactly what I thought and was wondering maybe I was missing something… thank you. That’s the obvious thing!
Is the calculator available somewhere??!!??!!
Hi Robert
May I ask what you think about Terrance Howard / on philosophy he talks about math gravity etc .
He says math is wrong
1 times 1
should make 2 ?
🌸
Oh just looked you have a pod on it I shall watch
X
How does one obtain that calculator on your PC, Robert? Digits on the right of the number's mantissa are significant to me and my works. Thank you for the incite about Terrance Howard. He has added some confusion. I cannot throw away man's ability to imagine straight lines, curvature is a creation of man's imperfect senses. Such as; the eye sees in frames per second ( thus curvature or blending ).
When I was watching keep hearing the words phase locked and anniversary!!! Any ideas of that relevance??
Is there another video where you address more of Terrences claims?
in the i-ching you have a dash and no dash. the ying and the yang,
before the base 10 decimal system, numbers were calculated using base 2 system.
similar to the binary system computers use to calculate today.
when you puzzle the i ching 64 hexagram together you get a 3d flower of life :)
But, what about Howard's assertion that 1x1=2?
(sqrt(n))^3)/n = (n^(3/2))/n = n^(3/2)*n^(-1) = n^(1/2) = sqrt(n)
You can solve this very easily analytically.
I am a numerical engineer but in such simple cases analytical calculations are very useful :)
I also do not agree with Terrence Howard on: straight lines do not occure in nature. Well in fact they do.
I am highly fascinated on how crystals are formed. Even salt is made up of straight lines.
I just did the same calculation. and also was thinking about things like pyrite, and vectors :)
@@itoobable haha funny :)
I do agree with the fact that our civilisation has way too much focus on straight lines and 90° edges. Curved lines are most of the times more appealing to the eye but way harder to construct.
@@hobolobobolo totally agree :) non conventional materials make constructing with curved lines easier. i've seen some stunning stone and cob structures! also, check out aircrete domes!
@@itoobable that looks really futuristic. I live it AUT and we have some beautiful "Kreuzgewölbe" = "cross vault" I guess?
But modern day brick layers dont do it anymore, too time expensive. The looks of it are stunning though. Our forefathers had serious taste and skill!
@@hobolobobolo it appears to translate as 'groin vault' hahha really beautiful! I have a friend who is aiming to build intersecting arches out of brick, very much like this. definitely a dying art which I hope find a revival!
This would be great for manifestation rituals!!!
Hey wow, thank you for all the work you put out there to the world, I like how after recent Terrance actions the internet Bombed talking about 100 years old theories, and pushing the initiative for others to go out there and bring their life works to the surface too! recently I follow your works, works of Dougherty, Lori Gardy, Maheran Kesher, and others. For making simulations in Blender geometry nodes with Russel's principles, your Phylomath calculator looks like a gold mine, where can I find Ryan Platform, can you please send me a link ?✌
Hello. Please apreciate some miss apreciation, and its related missunderstanding, at and in Robert, M Evans, Terrence theories, after real congrats Him/Them by his/their great discoveries and developments (the calc. is awesome):
By appsrition times:
M. Evan Trion-Re fails in "be coherent at axiomatical logic". How?
He leaves the "only straight lines are ok to use in polygons and polyhedra".
So, if we "leave that" to include archs of circles, as in trion-re, so, to be Faithful to Our Selves:
The 2Dimensional "lowest number sides" figure to construct an area, is 2, 2 lines, and the figure is: () (almond like, the 2 ⭕ overlooped area in/at vessica pisces).
And at/for 3D is a Lens, 2 areas, a Magnifier Glas biconcave. Is somthintg wierd how this... Loops can be "sipoorted" half a century, or +. If we use closed "continuum/continued,, regular, equal lines at/as sides" we get the circle as 1 at 2D and the Sphere as 1 at 3D, and if we relax more our "continued, regular" axioma, elipses and its 3D "rotational" projections in volume can be used, too.
Something close in 0^0, that is undefinied "until" we take a "Mathematical Convention"... But let this to the end of this post.
TH is in a deep missunderstood at:
By= Times= Multiplication.
1 times 1 is 1.
1 by 1 is 1.
1x1 is 1.
Here, times= by = x...?
He belives has found "the solution to a no problem" looking, touching "a real theoretic problem in arithmetics", trouble/problem related with axioms in number theory, it is why is real no sense (1x1=2) over/on real no sense, but the real "no sense= trouble= problem" solution is not "the no sense" at 1 times 1 is equal to 2.
Two times 1 is 2, or:
1+1
And
1x2, 1 "2 times" or 2 times 1 or 1 by 2 or 2 by 1.
The origin:
We all forget Multiplication is an abreviated sum, a lazzy addition, and here/there is where Terrence, "touchung the real theoretic trouble", he belives is "the same no sense he is talking as 1x1=2" he belives he have solved it as:
1x1= 2.
The trouble is in conceptual rooths, as here, but he make another "same kind of" mistake, taking with miss, with loosimg parts, why because have not "the real trouble formulation", and his 2nd mistake, at foundamentation, not at his great geometric and tech developments, at the 2nd thoeretical mistake is from this:
The clue is ((√(2))^(3))−(2×√(2)= ∅
Because:
Cubed √2 is equal 2√2= 2.8284271247
And if we duvide »_BY_« 2:
We have: √2.
Do You see the 3, 4 or 5 "2s"? (As √2 is 2^½, the notation, the way we write the "operation" will show or not show 2 twos, because √ implies a "2", but by lazziness is do not writed).
So:
Or ((2↑½)↑⅓)= (2↑1)x(2↑½) with the 5 Twos= 2s observables by the notational way was writed.
This works for any positive real number and or |-(Real No.)| its absolute value, meaning it applies/works to and for any positive "magnitude", not only to/for number 2, works for integrers, rationals, eaven with |R| the absolute value in all Reals.
But the loop is a little different as Terrence belives, You can make the calculations at ant sci calculator:
((√(3))^(3))−(3×√(3)= ∅
((√(4))^(3))−(4×√(4)= ∅
((√(4.58))^(3))−(4.58x√(4.58)= ∅
And:
((√(π×e))^(3))−((π×e)×√(π×e)= ∅.
So:
((√(|n|))^(3))−(|n|×√(|n|)= ∅
Terrence miss-apreciation was to aplicate the "formula" as a loop just "real" in/for number 2, the half or ½ or divide by 2, and obtain the square rooth or elevate: ↑½ or ^2 (or √), when is for:
(1/|n|) exponential= ↑(1/|n|) and |n|, as shown in the posted formulas and Robert shows in another way to reach the same proof.
The very fine issue about W Russell, the issue that him/them Robert, M. Evans, T.Howard and all looses, is that Walter have said, too:
... Zero Curvature Surface/Planes/Flat of Origin, From Gods "Realm", but that, to know about that, the Knowing of Walter's Magnetic Realm is another step, an experiential one, and we all will Re-MEMber that Flat source, as something elese, just another brick in the wall. W Russell used lenses and squares.
And, perhaps, that "That was Terrence ReMEMber to Him Self at his 6th month at His Mother's »Womb«".
And that is real more deepth than our number theoretic troubles, as in:
0^0= 1
But, if x²= 4 and then: x= 4^(½)= 2, so/then:
0= 1^(1/0)
And it do not works in any calculator... Is:
1/0 that do not work... And if we use math, we are just in a Mandatory way to obey our axiomas and postulates, or choose a "convention" to avoid the big trouble by taking a "little than but still a trouble... A big one" as a Mathematical Convention to "look ti other side" and go ahead.
Can be finded here:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero
Regards.
José Antonio Palos Cárdenas. ©D.R. 2024.
What about 2.5
Love your work Robert… but those shoes are a hard no. Please, for the love of goddess lol
“This is Sussudio “ ~Patrick Bateman
divide any 0. decimal by the same and no matter what it always equals 1.
there are only 9 ‘true’ numbers in the physical universe, so for instance the number 12; it’s true representation is 3. the number 69; it’s true representation is the number 6….
zero is infinity… everything within nothing all at once!
🙏💕🎶
Can abstract this one step further. This is also not unique to cubing the square root. In fact, you can choose any number, n, as the root. Then raise to the power of n + 1. This pattern will show again because after some simplifying of the equation you are really just saying that n + 1 - n = 1.
Absolutely nothing mysterious going on here. It’s just complex enough that average person can’t keep up with the math in their head, especially on the spot, so he’s able to hand wave it as though it’s breaking some kind of mathematical laws..
Thought we covered this ?? 👀
Am I missing something? This is so obvious to any math nerd. Love that calculator though! Bad ass!
So what is Terrance trying to get at because he’s not dumb or crazy so there has to be a there there somehow. You should have a discussion with him on here
❤👍
❤
7/4🎉
Amazing I say.
"by two" without limit , by any and every definition possible 1.41421 is even 5,5,3 or through additive reduction 13 or 4 Where have we seen the 13 and 4? We now have the complexity of math before us which as dis-covered expresses all that was re-vealed at Be-ginning!
This individual "life" "live" assisted the material world of plans in terms "building" There is one important tri-set at the foundation of "all building material"3-4-5 "live" by simple gematria is 3-9-4-5 its re-flective numerically is 5-4-9-3 I will not speak the letter re-flective here. Fluke! i have spent the last nine years trying to dis-prove these verities by every imaginable material proof we have in the world of math. I can not! I submit to the indefinable verity of these things which are not the invention of human material mind. These standards were set in place, and the foundation of them is most greatly seen in scripture and especially from Be-ginning. 7 days 1,2, (345) 6,7 is merely one in limitless ways to see it. This particular way expresses a balanced symmetry with a "heart of understanding. if you add these whole parts it is 3,3,4 which are a digital root 1 The 3-3 is the actual offering of 6 from be-ginning. in terms 1/2 Our sun and moon was not presented until Genesis 1-19 The fourth day. 3 days were not understandable by degree of our material comprehension as we see in a twenty four 2 and 4 (6) hour day. ................................................................................................................................................................................ where to stop!!!!!!!!! there is no end to it!!!!!! yet there has been offered all existence a be-ginning in support of understanding "eternal"
See you at Inception today...
0:23 mathewknowles #beyonce #treysmith #jayekingtv Upon God Lord Jesus Christ Is 12: the water a well
13: the vineyard 14: The Land The The plower hill terrain
15: heilman - beholden hell
16: woman's being inside of a whole
Below the is Man.5 16: man's being
below the female figure.6
17: The highway grounding of mountain terrain 18: the home of temple's {occultation code/19: waring amongst coin (Cesar [heaven] and hell): the war grounds are of Caesar's death
20: the ship of the Egyptian pharaoh's adolescency dead by brimming smotten (_Crete-] 21: upon the everlasting cross of salvation {#White...halo,. #blue..Men of God,. #red.Letters-hallelujah of the saints prophetic-word., #green of atonement upon the holyspirit...
J,
♾️❤
TH-cam is playing games with me again on my fire TV and it keeps kicking me off during this video I don't think it's a algorithm thing they just don't want me watching this video not hard to see.
Remember the weather channel is the Divine (God)’s comedy channel!!! lol!!!
Good move to keep the algebra equation and theory out of the explanations, less people would have had the patience to listen till the end. I hope @joerogan brings you on his show 🙏
Your flower of life doesn’t have a bug because in nature nothing is “perfect”! As Humans we are to leave room for the Divine!!!
and you still haven’t answered terrence’s specific claim that in the number two. the divisor is smaller than cube. weinstein apologizes for the number two calling it special(ed). so i still havent heard a legit refute to th claim. weinstein calls math perfect, but as long as you ignore the special cases
This is all smoke and mirrors.
Sq root of n cubed / n is
Sq root os n x sq root of n x sq root of n /n
= n x sq root of n / n = sq root of n . So all that was done is sq rt of n was multiplied by 1!!!
I ❤ Robert Marry Me Please
You have a scammer on here as you first comment you might want to remove @RoseDecker
Wow,it disappeared befor my eyes. Good job!