Instead of freaking out over 3 engined Chinese samosa planes, we should continue doggedly working on our own projects. Scaled up Ghatak is a good concept.
Yeah till now there is no confirmation that the jet flown was a 6th gen, as it didn't showed anything new that didn't already existed in 5th gen. It was most likely a stealthy bomber like B-2. Keeping that in mind focusing on a Ghatak based bomber is a good idea.
@@biscuit5359 I can guarantee you the concept of the designed overall is beyond what you can imagined and I am talking about both Chengdu and Shenyang's concept.
Would be cool to see India develop something like.. a 22-tonne Ghatak with a dry AMCA MK2 engine, an 80-tonne manned bomber with 2 dry AMCA MK2 engines, and a 35-tonne dedicated fighter-bomber with an afterburner section. These could be game-changers for future air-to-ground strike roles as well. But first, let's get the AMCA and
@@unknown_5107this only can happen in our dreams because Designing a dry engine for large platforms like a 22-tonne Ghatak or an 80-tonne bomber could be problematic. Dry engines, which lack afterburners, tend to offer lower thrust and lack the speed and performance needed for such heavy aircraft. This can be a major limitation, especially when these platforms would require enhanced thrust for supersonic speeds and maneuverability, kaveri engine still needs 2-3 years of proper development for approval, best we can do is keep every project aside pour full funding and complete the project in 1.5 years, it's the most delayed project yet still haven't completed from 20 years, this will be best for iaf
@nishantkumar2405 For greater internal payload capacity & endurance, there is a reason why the IAF is waiting for more expensive Tejas mk2 & Rafale instead filling the whole fighter aircraft fleet with 13.5 tonne Tejas mk1a.
😳 han bhai me bhi ye pehli baar sun kar dang rah gaya is defence analyst se Me defence matrix (aur Alpha Defence) ko karib 5 saal se follow kar rha hun par isne ye jo baat kahi is se pata chal gaya ise real war scenario ke bare me thik se pata nahi hai jab hamara nominal GDP badhega tab Europe aur US hamare against honge aur ab to Turkey Azerbaijan jaise anti-india country hain
Requirements can change in a short period of time and then we depend on Jugaad to get things done costing precious lives of our Soldiers/Sailers/Airmen. Unless we explore and build up on our research and technology, we'll always fall short. Our thinking is to defend against any Chinese threat. Well...they'll always be a threat till they realize that we can be offensive too.
Brother.Why do we consider our enemies only china & pakistan? Seriously.Have u forgot about US in 1971 war?We can become "Vishwa Guru" only if we can have capability to strike every part of world just like USA.Talking about bombers why aren't we expecting 2.5 front war? This is called living in mirage 😂 Seriously 😂
We don't have the money to fight them for the time being . Let's first confront China and then we can talk about US when we grow a better Economic superiority first . Remember China is making them because they have economic power similar or close to Us that is can't harm them much where as we are completely dependent on good relationship with US and Nato countries. So a technology that is threatening them is simply a denial of economic growth by us .
bruhh it was the time of cold war today things are completely different i'm not saying us is an ally but the conditions were different back then us was ally of pakistan and today pakistan is getting sanctions
No country is stupid enough to start a war over land unless they're too desperate like Russia or Palestine. Even though we independently don't have the capability to fight a 2.5 front war, it seems very unlikely to me any war is going to happen if diplomacy is maintained.
Agree! we don't need to invest resources in lang range bombers, but what about the jet engines? We need to R&D a lot in jet engines for better future in various areas.
Respectfully, a Ghatak-based long-range bomber can be a strategic asset for Bharat, not just for precision strikes but also for psychological impact on enemies. Its stealth and autonomous capabilities can instill uncertainty, disrupt enemy planning, and strengthen Bharat's deterrence. Isn't investing in such tech a step toward securing both physical and psychological superiority?
India needs more multi-role fighters. Being budget-strapped, India can't afford specialized mission combat aircraft (they can be done through UCAVs though). But a Ghatak-type UCAV can be useful for anti-surface operations on land and sea, where even a loss of aircraft won't mean the loss of trained personnel. India needs a proper fleet of 4.5 and 5 gen aircraft with proper support from ground-based radars, network-centric warfare, and refueling and surveillance-command-control aircraft.
A 45 ton manned bomber with 2 110kn engine's with mach 2 speed, 15 ton payload (hardpoints + internal), 4000+ km ferry range, 15000 mt ceiling should be developed for air force strike version and maritime strike & antiship roles for navy with development duration of 10 years based on enlarged design of ghatak
Mother UCAV ko bana bhi ek jaroorat hona chahiye...aur Navy and Air Force ke liye NE Region ke liye Mother UCAV and small loitering ammos ko fit karke ops karna jada phayede mand hou sakta hai agar Myanmar disintegrate hou gaya aur hame aur region pe capture karna hou tou...conflict ko face karenge aur uss same manpower ko strategic points pe hold karne aur other things ko capture karne mei use karenge...
I don't fully agree with take on "we don't need a long range bigger payload capable aircraft". The need for long range platforms is not immediate but its a necessary one, that to an optionaly manned one like B 21. Drone's can do the job to a certain point but not fully, smaller drones means smaller payload, it won't provide the necessary punch or the surprise factor that a heavier single attack will give. Also the way china is developing electronic warfare systems, any drone only operation can be difficult or may be impossible to conduct, communication between the drones can be cut easily and also compromise any totally passive approach of target. Missiles are an option but accuracy is a big factor, for a conventional deep strike of target we would need accurate target coordinates or boots on the ground to guide them to target, then also a pinpoint attack is difficult against a well defended target. Also the longer the distance again payload of a conventional missile comes in to question. We all saw how many missile it took for russia to hit many targets in ukraine, even when they had good intelligence. We still lack any dedicated military satellite or agency large enough to collect accurate intelligence on important targets (Many news reporters were saying americans provided satellite data to warn us about Chinese movements around the border). On the other hand a stealthy optionally manned aircraft has the option to stay completely silent, will be able to hit multiple targets in one go with heavier payload. In a Special operation scenario these can stay on station longer, act as an force multiplier to provide backup if needed. One other major advantage is, these aircrafts can be stationed in different bases to avoid being targeted in the initial stages of the attack because natural china will have thousands of missiles targeted at bases close to the border and even if all bases are targeted, the distance from the border will provide just enough time to make a few of them airborne, unlike bases closer to the border, which will have no time to prepare or defend unless any prior Intel is received about an attack.
India must not remain on defensive posture. We faced long 800 years of suppression, destruction, annihilation , conversion due to this defensive policy started by Ashoka. Impact of this remained for more than thousand years. India must prepare for prepare in such a way that china must pay for any misadventure and that can only be achieved if you have defensive offence mind set, capability and resolve. At this moment , China may be leading but if we keep on working, in decade time things will start matching as china is doing with US today.
Everyone in tech nowadays is talking about the AI bubble bursting, as multiple studies have found that it hasn't improved productivity as expected contrarily error rate has increased. What are the implications of this in the defense sector? It takes immense effort to identify weaknesses in enemy non-AI systems to exploit them, but in the case of AI, isn't it much easier to deceive or exploit, especially if human intervention is completely absent? Could you provide an analysis on this?
I dont agree with your argument of importing instead of R&Ding the tech. R&D is not product specific but technology specific, if we invest in Bomber tech R&D we can derive several derivatives of that tech, such as Optimizing flight control algorithms, stealth, and many more! Many think that the R&D is only product specific but it is not the case, it is mostly tech specific.
If you can achieve this with kaveri , do it , if gou need usa based engines , go to sleep again , even russian engines may be preferred, as russia even supplied engines to pak during war . Reliability is very important.
First thing EVEN USA due to high cost of stealth bomber usa acquired only 16-18 b2 spirit bombers.but however there designing it from late50s. (Interceptor Sr_71). B2 in 1980. B21(2011) . Thus if we want deployment beyond IOR THEN WE must design develop limited number bomber. As there is no chances that war with any country is going to be in limited sphere.
When someday suddenly the need for a manned stealth bomber arises,the same analyst will start blaming the the defense research establishment. If Unmanned Ghatak was enough and we were on right track, why the panicking and moaning videos in reaction to the J 36 unveiling?
If china fills there are not strong in Himalayas they can open front in IOR thus challenging the Indian Navy. If we want to challenge them beyond IOR WE MUST look forward to design, develop,acquire limited number of stealth bomber.however Indian Navy doesn't have any plan for this as stated by naval chief.
Why to go for bomber can't we go for a stealthy fighter of same design and same size also. And that fighter can also work as maned unmaned teaming system mothership. And also fulfill our six gen fighter requirement.
How will we effectively absorb new technology when the brightest minds are not attracted to organizations like DRDO, HAL, ISRO, or any national defense corporation? I completed an internship at DRDO last year and received a job offer of ₹55,000 per month. This is hardly competitive. My software internship alone paid ₹120,000 per month as a starting stipend. Until these organizations offer competitive salaries that reflect the value of their talent pool, they will struggle to attract and retain skilled professionals.
Sorry Defence Matrix We might need to do operations in South China sea in future. May be once our economy grow US can see us as a threat. India definetly needs long range STEALTH Bombers. If we start building it today it will be in operation in a decade or 2. If u really want to be a super power u cant be without military power.
Agar China ke Sath war ho toh China ka humangas navy Indian ocean mai ajayega. USs condition mai hame bomber ki jarurat hai . 3 to 4 aircraft carrer ageya toh hame bomber ki jarurat hai .
lagta hai aapko bombers ke bare me sahi se nahi pata hai...bombers high altitude par fly karte hai aur agar wo 1500 km doori tak mar karne wali air to surface missiles carry karte hai to wo China me hi Fly karte hue himalyan region ke peeche rahte hue bhi solid air strike kar sakte hai...Bomber keeal bomb hi carry nahi karte wo missiles bhi carry kar sakte hai.🙏🏽
Yes we can make manned ghatak fighter bomber which would come with 3 engines AL-41 probably, Yes we should make atleast 3 prototypes , range should only be til main land china only
Main sawaal hai ki kya humein long range bonbers ki zarurat hogi aaj se 20 saal baad ? Answer is YES. the question isnt whether we need it today. 20 yrs mein @6% compounded growth we will be a 14 trillion $ economy and closing the gap with US and china. Toh HAA Bilkul humein zarurat hai aise bombers ki.
india can't even build a jet engine, doesn't even know how to build a 4th gen fighter plane, yet talking so much about 6th gen. Tejas is just a 3.5th gen plane, basically a smaller version of the mirage. India also doesn't know what 4.5 gen is all about, 5th gen is a more than stealth itself. it will take india at least 50 years to even build 4.5 gen airplane
I have no idea what this guy is thinking…let’s take example of russia ukr war..these normal manned bomber are able to carry out strikes on ukraine frim within the russian territory…china has that ability already which can strike india within mainland china itself…and chinese stealth bomber is currently in development not six gen ones and how will india strike chinese aircraft carrier fleet with missle only? You do realise india can’t cover-a whole indian ocean with outdated planes in comparison to upcoming j35 naval version…even if you have subs china has more and more advance one itself..india would be quite lucky getting russian bomber like tu165M cause russia have cash strap…moment war ends and russia is back on fleet..let’s see the tide again and honestly India deserves it after 404 and potentially 414 deal😂
No they can't. Bombers also have range and also you will need a lot of friendly nations to be able to do that. And I really don't understand why you didn't consider that we increase the range of drones.
@@sdsbro4997drones are limited due to their size in how much the range can be extended. Comparatively bomber have longer range. And with 1 refulinmg it can be done.
How about a FB 22 like Bomber based on AMCA. It was proposed bomber concept which was later rejected in favour of bigger and longer range bomber .I think it would be our best beat against chinese white Emperor. Maybe you can build a whole video about me . 😊@@DefenceMatrix
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 india ki auqat sirf Tejas samosa hay woh bhi mantay tangay ka, aur khuwab dekh rahe hain 6th 7th generation ka, o bhai pehlay apnay pilots to puray kar lo. 1 fighter jet k liye 1.25 pilots hain tumharay paas. dunya may is se kum kisi k paas bhi nahi.
Jab hum US aur UK ke liye competition ban jayenge tab kaun export karega aise strategic platforms ? Ye import karne ka keeda dumaag se jaata hi nahi hai Indians ke. Aaj se 20 saal baad we will be a major regional power and we will have economic interests to protect in areas where drones will need refuelling. I am very disappointed to see such amateurish analysis.
Engine ?????????????????????????????
We will ask the United States of oil burglar again 😂
Dry kaveri
We will ask ravan to give his puspak Yan's engine😂
We have dry kaveri engine with 51kn significant thrust 😎
Non need for afterburner in bomber
Instead of freaking out over 3 engined Chinese samosa planes, we should continue doggedly working on our own projects. Scaled up Ghatak is a good concept.
Yeah till now there is no confirmation that the jet flown was a 6th gen, as it didn't showed anything new that didn't already existed in 5th gen. It was most likely a stealthy bomber like B-2. Keeping that in mind focusing on a Ghatak based bomber is a good idea.
@@biscuit5359 I can guarantee you the concept of the designed overall is beyond what you can imagined and I am talking about both Chengdu and Shenyang's concept.
@@jackcc429 Maybe or Maybe not. If more info is given in the future, that would be a good thing.
Chinese 6th Gen bomber ko Samosa bol diya, one more masterstroke in security policy
Ok and are they some kind of spacecraft, anything from china I don't consider them advanced, only US have proven technology of 6th Gen @@jackcc429
Would be cool to see India develop something like.. a 22-tonne Ghatak with a dry AMCA MK2 engine, an 80-tonne manned bomber with 2 dry AMCA MK2 engines, and a 35-tonne dedicated fighter-bomber with an afterburner section. These could be game-changers for future air-to-ground strike roles as well. But first, let's get the AMCA and
@@unknown_5107this only can happen in our dreams because Designing a dry engine for large platforms like a 22-tonne Ghatak or an 80-tonne bomber could be problematic. Dry engines, which lack afterburners, tend to offer lower thrust and lack the speed and performance needed for such heavy aircraft. This can be a major limitation, especially when these platforms would require enhanced thrust for supersonic speeds and maneuverability, kaveri engine still needs 2-3 years of proper development for approval, best we can do is keep every project aside pour full funding and complete the project in 1.5 years, it's the most delayed project yet still haven't completed from 20 years, this will be best for iaf
Why 22 ton. We can make many small size ghaatak.
@nishantkumar2405 For greater internal payload capacity & endurance, there is a reason why the IAF is waiting for more expensive Tejas mk2 & Rafale instead filling the whole fighter aircraft fleet with 13.5 tonne Tejas mk1a.
You are a good analyser ,if someone attacks you,you don't retaliate just defend and then keep quiet
you're a 16y/o kid
😳 han bhai me bhi ye pehli baar sun kar dang rah gaya is defence analyst se
Me defence matrix (aur Alpha Defence) ko karib 5 saal se follow kar rha hun par isne ye jo baat kahi is se pata chal gaya ise real war scenario ke bare me thik se pata nahi hai jab hamara nominal GDP badhega tab Europe aur US hamare against honge aur ab to Turkey Azerbaijan jaise anti-india country hain
@@kratuvam7 tujhe kuchh pata nahi hai bas kar
Requirements can change in a short period of time and then we depend on Jugaad to get things done costing precious lives of our Soldiers/Sailers/Airmen. Unless we explore and build up on our research and technology, we'll always fall short. Our thinking is to defend against any Chinese threat. Well...they'll always be a threat till they realize that we can be offensive too.
But Bombers can help indian navy to dominate Indian Ocean and patrol long distance in Indian Ocean
But there is other type of bombers for navy like mig 31, su 34 or f 15etc
We indians can only dream and talk big, no actual work is being done
atleast we have access to talk, unlike bots and bhikaris
Brother.Why do we consider our enemies only china & pakistan? Seriously.Have u forgot about US in 1971 war?We can become "Vishwa Guru" only if we can have capability to strike every part of world just like USA.Talking about bombers why aren't we expecting 2.5 front war? This is called living in mirage 😂 Seriously 😂
We don't have the money to fight them for the time being .
Let's first confront China and then we can talk about US when we grow a better Economic superiority first .
Remember China is making them because they have economic power similar or close to Us that is can't harm them much where as we are completely dependent on good relationship with US and Nato countries.
So a technology that is threatening them is simply a denial of economic growth by us .
bruhh it was the time of cold war
today things are completely different
i'm not saying us is an ally but the conditions were different back then
us was ally of pakistan and today pakistan is getting sanctions
No country is stupid enough to start a war over land unless they're too desperate like Russia or Palestine. Even though we independently don't have the capability to fight a 2.5 front war, it seems very unlikely to me any war is going to happen if diplomacy is maintained.
You have quality. Nice video.
If we are getting 3-4 bomber there is no need to develop it from scratch. Just buy it. And reallocate resources to other stuff.
Offence is the best defence …..
Agree! we don't need to invest resources in lang range bombers, but what about the jet engines? We need to R&D a lot in jet engines for better future in various areas.
In future our priority is global not only Pak and china
Your first task is not to pee anywhere.
You first not drink that pee 😂
Respectfully, a Ghatak-based long-range bomber can be a strategic asset for Bharat, not just for precision strikes but also for psychological impact on enemies. Its stealth and autonomous capabilities can instill uncertainty, disrupt enemy planning, and strengthen Bharat's deterrence. Isn't investing in such tech a step toward securing both physical and psychological superiority?
India needs more multi-role fighters. Being budget-strapped, India can't afford specialized mission combat aircraft (they can be done through UCAVs though). But a Ghatak-type UCAV can be useful for anti-surface operations on land and sea, where even a loss of aircraft won't mean the loss of trained personnel. India needs a proper fleet of 4.5 and 5 gen aircraft with proper support from ground-based radars, network-centric warfare, and refueling and surveillance-command-control aircraft.
Engine bana nahin sakte toh khyali pulao nahin banana chahiye😂😂
Happy new year dear Durgesh jee❤❤❤
Requirement achi gazi hone tak ham betkar goli khelenge to...deterrence ka kyaa?🤷♂️
Good idea 👍
A 45 ton manned bomber with 2 110kn engine's with mach 2 speed, 15 ton payload (hardpoints + internal), 4000+ km ferry range, 15000 mt ceiling should be developed for air force strike version and maritime strike & antiship roles for navy with development duration of 10 years based on enlarged design of ghatak
Mother UCAV ko bana bhi ek jaroorat hona chahiye...aur Navy and Air Force ke liye NE Region ke liye Mother UCAV and small loitering ammos ko fit karke ops karna jada phayede mand hou sakta hai agar Myanmar disintegrate hou gaya aur hame aur region pe capture karna hou tou...conflict ko face karenge aur uss same manpower ko strategic points pe hold karne aur other things ko capture karne mei use karenge...
I don't fully agree with take on "we don't need a long range bigger payload capable aircraft". The need for long range platforms is not immediate but its a necessary one, that to an optionaly manned one like B 21.
Drone's can do the job to a certain point but not fully, smaller drones means smaller payload, it won't provide the necessary punch or the surprise factor that a heavier single attack will give. Also the way china is developing electronic warfare systems, any drone only operation can be difficult or may be impossible to conduct, communication between the drones can be cut easily and also compromise any totally passive approach of target.
Missiles are an option but accuracy is a big factor, for a conventional deep strike of target we would need accurate target coordinates or boots on the ground to guide them to target, then also a pinpoint attack is difficult against a well defended target. Also the longer the distance again payload of a conventional missile comes in to question. We all saw how many missile it took for russia to hit many targets in ukraine, even when they had good intelligence. We still lack any dedicated military satellite or agency large enough to collect accurate intelligence on important targets (Many news reporters were saying americans provided satellite data to warn us about Chinese movements around the border).
On the other hand a stealthy optionally manned aircraft has the option to stay completely silent, will be able to hit multiple targets in one go with heavier payload. In a Special operation scenario these can stay on station longer, act as an force multiplier to provide backup if needed.
One other major advantage is, these aircrafts can be stationed in different bases to avoid being targeted in the initial stages of the attack because natural china will have thousands of missiles targeted at bases close to the border and even if all bases are targeted, the distance from the border will provide just enough time to make a few of them airborne, unlike bases closer to the border, which will have no time to prepare or defend unless any prior Intel is received about an attack.
Why ADA USING GE 414 INS6 OVER GE 414 EPE ,EPE IS BETTER THAN INS6 IN EVERY WAY
India must not remain on defensive posture.
We faced long 800 years of suppression, destruction, annihilation , conversion due to this defensive policy started by Ashoka. Impact of this remained for more than thousand years.
India must prepare for prepare in such a way that china must pay for any misadventure and that can only be achieved if you have defensive offence mind set, capability and resolve.
At this moment , China may be leading but if we keep on working, in decade time things will start matching as china is doing with US today.
yes in year 2125 it can be ioc certified.
Everyone in tech nowadays is talking about the AI bubble bursting, as multiple studies have found that it hasn't improved productivity as expected contrarily error rate has increased. What are the implications of this in the defense sector? It takes immense effort to identify weaknesses in enemy non-AI systems to exploit them, but in the case of AI, isn't it much easier to deceive or exploit, especially if human intervention is completely absent? Could you provide an analysis on this?
By the time that bomber (if approved) will be made the possible war would have been long over !
Air Defence is priority.
I dont agree with your argument of importing instead of R&Ding the tech. R&D is not product specific but technology specific, if we invest in Bomber tech R&D we can derive several derivatives of that tech, such as Optimizing flight control algorithms, stealth, and many more! Many think that the R&D is only product specific but it is not the case, it is mostly tech specific.
It will only work when it has something that works together with it, like something smarter to protect it.
If you can achieve this with kaveri , do it , if gou need usa based engines , go to sleep again , even russian engines may be preferred, as russia even supplied engines to pak during war . Reliability is very important.
Always defensive posture is wrost for India... We showcase ourself as a Cold and soft nation.... 😡😡
All This is futile. Unless India develop its own engines such projects are gonna be in pipeline for decades.
Aaj nahi hai objective lekin future me toh hogi na requirement
First thing EVEN USA due to high cost of stealth bomber usa acquired only 16-18 b2 spirit bombers.but however there designing it from late50s. (Interceptor Sr_71). B2 in 1980. B21(2011) . Thus if we want deployment beyond IOR THEN WE must design develop limited number bomber. As there is no chances that war with any country is going to be in limited sphere.
When someday suddenly the need for a manned stealth bomber arises,the same analyst will start blaming the the defense research establishment. If Unmanned Ghatak was enough and we were on right track, why the panicking and moaning videos in reaction to the J 36 unveiling?
Engine kaha se lena hai mere dost.?
Bro... What's the point of such discussion unless IAF wants it.😅
If china fills there are not strong in Himalayas they can open front in IOR thus challenging the Indian Navy. If we want to challenge them beyond IOR WE MUST look forward to design, develop,acquire limited number of stealth bomber.however Indian Navy doesn't have any plan for this as stated by naval chief.
Why to go for bomber can't we go for a stealthy fighter of same design and same size also. And that fighter can also work as maned unmaned teaming system mothership. And also fulfill our six gen fighter requirement.
Can Gathak cover Tibet?
How will we effectively absorb new technology when the brightest minds are not attracted to organizations like DRDO, HAL, ISRO, or any national defense corporation? I completed an internship at DRDO last year and received a job offer of ₹55,000 per month. This is hardly competitive. My software internship alone paid ₹120,000 per month as a starting stipend. Until these organizations offer competitive salaries that reflect the value of their talent pool, they will struggle to attract and retain skilled professionals.
Ghatak to ban jaaye pehle.
Hi @defencematrix there's news regarding some satellite images from bareli afb where a delta wing aircraft with canards is captured what it could be
Still, India should acquire Tupolev-160M, if reasonably priced.
If you are on the board but not playing you will lose. If your adversary has a long range bomber, you should have too.
Sorry Defence Matrix We might need to do operations in South China sea in future. May be once our economy grow US can see us as a threat. India definetly needs long range STEALTH Bombers. If we start building it today it will be in operation in a decade or 2. If u really want to be a super power u cant be without military power.
We can work on both bombers and Its engines side by side . there's no hurry like fighter jets
🤡 do india have money
@weingkham4033 It depends on the necessity, if yes than we have huge money and if no we don't have money .
@@badlav120 lol...even if u need....u can't spend that much money like the usa n u don't have technology either for such aircraft
India should buy 100 b-2s
1) US doesn't export B-2 Spirit.
2) Even if they were to export them, a single unit costs around $2 Billion, a 100 of 'em would cost $200 Billion.
Jack of all trades master of nothing..
ye bilkul mt sochna ki war m china apne bombers use nhi karega ye kah kr ki india ke pass bomber nhi h
We are discussing idea
Where is product??????????????????
Agar China ke Sath war ho toh China ka humangas navy Indian ocean mai ajayega. USs condition mai hame bomber ki jarurat hai . 3 to 4 aircraft carrer ageya toh hame bomber ki jarurat hai .
Russia has s 70 ucav but they havent been able to introduce pak da ? So how long ut will take to make ghatak into a proper long range manned bomber
We have to induct ghatak in big numbers
Indian Paper plane 😅
lagta hai aapko bombers ke bare me sahi se nahi pata hai...bombers high altitude par fly karte hai aur agar wo 1500 km doori tak mar karne wali air to surface missiles carry karte hai to wo China me hi Fly karte hue himalyan region ke peeche rahte hue bhi solid air strike kar sakte hai...Bomber keeal bomb hi carry nahi karte wo missiles bhi carry kar sakte hai.🙏🏽
Questions pushane wala what do you think about amca
No progress just plans , shiekh chilli
what about engine ?
Why do we always want our planes to look like those of either amriki or russian origin? Why no original design of our own?
Hame bada bhari bomber chahiye
Yes we can make manned ghatak fighter bomber which would come with 3 engines AL-41 probably, Yes we should make atleast 3 prototypes , range should only be til main land china only
Honda Activa ka engine lagana
😂
The only thing we can do is talking about it indian govt slow 🐌
Where is Ghatak ??????????????
Chinese invest in research and development.. we invest in religious fanaticism...
So called??? define plzzz
Some speculations says its j20 with delta wing configuration and absent stablizers !! Rather then that we have never seen its 6th gen qualities
O bhai khud kouch ker nahi saktay dosro per tanqeed ker rahi Ho 😂😂Chawal marnay main ap pahlay number per hon
It will take delays and delays
These aren't bomber these are 6th Gen fighter jet
Again Track pr agaya ye hahahahahaha XD
Structure to bana sakte hai engine kaha se aaye ga mere dosto is par baat honi chahiye. Is par koi baat hi nahi karta hai
Main sawaal hai ki kya humein long range bonbers ki zarurat hogi aaj se 20 saal baad ?
Answer is YES.
the question isnt whether we need it today.
20 yrs mein @6% compounded growth we will be a 14 trillion $ economy and closing the gap with US and china.
Toh HAA Bilkul humein zarurat hai aise bombers ki.
india can't even build a jet engine, doesn't even know how to build a 4th gen fighter plane, yet talking so much about 6th gen. Tejas is just a 3.5th gen plane, basically a smaller version of the mirage. India also doesn't know what 4.5 gen is all about, 5th gen is a more than stealth itself. it will take india at least 50 years to even build 4.5 gen airplane
We need deterrence.
Thumbnail mein problem hai
india all talk 😂😂😂😂😂, not even able to make a simple fighter jet yet
I have no idea what this guy is thinking…let’s take example of russia ukr war..these normal manned bomber are able to carry out strikes on ukraine frim within the russian territory…china has that ability already which can strike india within mainland china itself…and chinese stealth bomber is currently in development not six gen ones and how will india strike chinese aircraft carrier fleet with missle only? You do realise india can’t cover-a whole indian ocean with outdated planes in comparison to upcoming j35 naval version…even if you have subs china has more and more advance one itself..india would be quite lucky getting russian bomber like tu165M cause russia have cash strap…moment war ends and russia is back on fleet..let’s see the tide again and honestly India deserves it after 404 and potentially 414 deal😂
पेहले से हि लेट है , जो बन राहा हे घातक् बनने डो , बीचे कुछ नया मत बनाओ , वर्णा साल् 2080 लाग जायेगा
Hamare paas limited number be aircraft be nahi hai or aap bomber ke requirements ke rahe ho 🤣🤣🤦🤦
🤣🤣 bomber used in limited quantity only (Pakistani even don't understand this 🤦)
Everything on Paper
YOU MADE A VIDEO based on my inner thoughts
Bomber can bomb anywhere in world but drones cannot
No they can't. Bombers also have range and also you will need a lot of friendly nations to be able to do that. And I really don't understand why you didn't consider that we increase the range of drones.
@sdsbro4997 because drones cannot have half range of bomber
@@sdsbro4997drones are limited due to their size in how much the range can be extended. Comparatively bomber have longer range. And with 1 refulinmg it can be done.
@sdsbro4997 drones cannot carry heavy cruise missiles like brahmos but bomber carry multiple
No , waste of resources
😅😅😅😅😅
Engine nehin hai chale Bomber banane😅😅😅
Indian HAL the licence protection of Saturn AL-31 engine (this is the same engine Chinese used on j20 prototype )
Imagine if Pakistan, endia ko Babur cruise missile day ga TU endia ka kia hoga 🧐🤔 jai hind
13 ton
UAV pr hi ajao osme tm log Pakistan ke close ni baat china ki kr rhy wow XD fleet check kro apni XD LOLX
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💖
Engine apko mil naha baat dosro ki ker rahy ho
Sir thumbnail me Correction required hai
Bomber
Done, Thanks.
How about a FB 22 like Bomber based on AMCA. It was proposed bomber concept which was later rejected in favour of bigger and longer range bomber .I think it would be our best beat against chinese white Emperor.
Maybe you can build a whole video about me . 😊@@DefenceMatrix
Ans : India needs everything that any superpower country has it or it wants.
😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 india ki auqat sirf Tejas samosa hay woh bhi mantay tangay ka, aur khuwab dekh rahe hain 6th 7th generation ka, o bhai pehlay apnay pilots to puray kar lo. 1 fighter jet k liye 1.25 pilots hain tumharay paas. dunya may is se kum kisi k paas bhi nahi.
Paisa? Requirement? Engine?
Bhai china ka target usa 🇺🇸 hai to humara target bhi to china 🇨🇳 hai 😂😂😂😂😂...?
Wrong interpretation, It's not a bomber, and It's not one both countries USA and China already have stealth bomber.
Jab hum US aur UK ke liye competition ban jayenge tab kaun export karega aise strategic platforms ?
Ye import karne ka keeda dumaag se jaata hi nahi hai Indians ke.
Aaj se 20 saal baad we will be a major regional power and we will have economic interests to protect in areas where drones will need refuelling.
I am very disappointed to see such amateurish analysis.