What's up everyone, I tried somewhat different lighting for this video and actually kinda liked experimenting with it to achieve a more dramatic look. What do you think about the low key lighting in this video? Dig it or hate it? Anyways, I hope you enjoy the video!
You probably dont give a shit but does someone know a trick to get back into an instagram account?? I was stupid forgot the account password. I would love any help you can give me
@@daniellance6892 Have you tried resetting your password already? You can normally recover a forgotten password by phone number or email if I'm not mistaken.
I agree. The 10-25 is probably my most favorite lens of all time. I just wish the Nocticron had a little less chromatic aberrations and proper weather sealing.
I absolutely agree. The 7-14 is an outstanding lens but I didn't include it this review because it doesn't allow any screw on filters. If you're fine with an adapted solution, it is no problem though. For video work, the Leica 10-25 just feels the best in terms of features.
It's a great lens for the prive. But if you want to use it on the GH5 with a focal reducer, you need to modify the mount of it for it to function properly. There is a slight risk of damage though, so I wouldn't advise doing that.
Nice vid, great information and production value! Question though: I love wide angle lenses for video, but when do they make sense for photography? I almost always get too much objects in my frame, distracting from the subject..... And for the one or two times something really big pops up, would a panorama not be enough?
Thank you for your feedback! If you have the time to create a panorama, you'll be fine with almost any regular wide lens too. This takes additional time and effort in post though, which is why I personally still use ultra wide angle lenses like these, even for photography. Since I also shoot quite many videos, ultra wide angle lenses have a very special place in my kit. If you're interested in the other gear I use for my videos, you can check my full gear list right here: kit.co/valentinkossenko.
hi @Valentin Kossenko. Hope I get a reply. I am planning to by Micro four thirds Panasonic BGH1 (Netflix approved). As per you Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 is the best. May I know if Panasonic BGH1 + Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 is a good combination to make films for theatre and Netflix or similar. I am able to get theory but since I am not a cinematographer myself I am not able to understand. All I am looking for is to make independent movies and pitch it to Netflix or similar or for theatrical release. 1) How does the combination Panasonic BGH1 + Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 workout ? Please let me know. 2) Is the cropping good and look more like a movie view ?
Yeah, that'd be a great combination. The 10-25 f/1.7 is great for cinematography as it offers a real manual focusing ring, has minimal breathing and enough bokeh and separation for some cinematic sequences.
Hi good and interesting review. I wouldn't call the 10-25 ultra-wide, but I understand why you included it in your comparison. I use the Panasonic 7-14 for wider photos and video. I use the excellent PVGear adapter which allows screw on filters to be attached (I use a variable ND), which overcomes one of the drawbacks of the lens often mentioned by reviewers, including yourself. I don't think it would have scored highly in your comparison because of the criteria you used, and that's fair enough because the lenses you chose all have better features in some respects, but if you don't need a fast aperture (say mostly outdoor landscape) then the 7-14 should not be overlooked as an option as it's smaller, lighter has good autofocus, is a pleasure to use and is great value for money if it meets your needs. 🙂
I didn't overlook it and it's definitely a great lens if you don't necessarily need any regular screw on filters and you're fine with adapted solutions. In the beginning of this review I also talk about the reasons, why I have chosen these lenses for the review and comparison. Hope that makes sense! Thanks for your comment! 😊
@@ValentinKossenko Good point. The major drawback is that you can't simply screw on an ND or other filters. The filter holders available seem to clunky for my workflow. I learned to work around that, as I love the Oly pro series for MFT, in particular for the focus ring clutch.
Hi! Very nice review. Thorough and consistent. I would argue with weights assigned to each categories, but it is subjective. I would also argue that assigning points based on AoV range rather than on focal range when comparing ultra wide angle lenses is more reasonable. I don't own neither of these lenses, but I consider them all when I was in a market for such lenses. I need lens to film a choir from a close distance in dimmly lit interiors. I thaought I need wider possible lens and zoom as sometimes I cannot move the camera freely, that is why I excluded lenses such as Laowa 7.5 and Voigtlander 10.5 (which sucks BTW). I need constant apeture. That is why I excluded Leica 8-16mm. I need fast apeture that is why I excluded Lumix 7-14mm. I have tried breifly Tokina 11-20 with Viltrox but I was not blown away by the IQ, although it was OK. I decided on Olympus 7-14mm. But it turned out that sihlouettes on the edge of the frame on any rectilinear lens look eerie stretched. They started to look OK from about 10mm M43. The most usefull range is 10-14mm M43. BTW Olympus is not that great against direct sources of light. That is why Leica 10-25mm appear on a table. But its darn expensive! I don't have a budget for that. So I started to think about Tokina 14-20 f/2.0. With Viltrox it would provide 10-14 f/1.4 M43 equivalent. And it is said to be very sharp. Would you be willing to test it on GH5 someday? Maybe it can be loaned? Noone has ever tested this setup. And comparing it to Leica 10-25 f/1.7 would be very interesting.
Thank you so much for your comment, Paweł! I agree with your points on AoV for the most part. This is still a somewhat subjective opinion as it's kind of hard to decide whether biggest AoV is worth more than overall focal length coverage. The Tokina is ever so slightly wider than the 8-18, but the sharpness, optical performance and overall zoom range is a lot worse. I would love to test the Tokina 14-20 f/2.0 for you, but at the moment I still have two more lenses (42.5mm f/1.2 & 50-200mm f/2.8-f/4 + 2X TC) that need to be reviewed before that. Since I am doing all of this aside my main job as a facebook marketing specialist, I have only limited amount of time to work on new videos. I would love to do this full time, which is why I am currently also working on the Content Creator Circle, a course for creators. I understand that the price for the Leica 10-25 is quite high, but nonetheless I can highly recommend it and think that it will be very hard to find a good replacement for it. Lenstip did a great review on that lens as well, which you should definitely give a read if you haven't already. It's optical performance is outstanding throughout the zoom range. This is very rare for such a lens and reminds me of the reviews of the Sigma 18-35 when it first came out. Although the Sigma 18-35 is a tiny bit better in low light with a focal reducer, the Leica 10-25 offers better overall focal length coverage, a manual aperture ring as well as smooth auto exposure in videos, which is just great. This might sound like I am sponsored by Panasonic or Lumix, but I can assure you that I'm not. There's nothing like this lens, that's all. It's expensive, but definitely worth it in my opinion.
@@ValentinKossenko It doesn't sound sponsored to me. I am polish. I read all the tests in polish on optyczne.pl which is the original full version of lenstip.com I agree that Leica 10-25 is in every way better that Tokina + Sigma + speedbooster except for the apeture. But I wonder wheter Tokina is just good enough as it can be found in aftermarket for a fraction of the Leica's price and Sigma's focal range is less critical for me. I would use manual focus in such scenarios anyway. So far I will try hunting for second-hand Leica.
"look eerie stretched" - That's basically a function of the ultra wide FOV. Today, for video work you should probably acquire the new Panasonic 9 mm f1.7.
The Sigma 18-35 + focal reducer is roughly 25-50mm in terms of full frame equivalence. Since this is nowhere near ultra wide angle territory I decided to test these three lenses instead. I have compared the Sigma to the Leica 10-25 in past videos though, so if you're interested in that, you can watch these videos on my channel.
The talking heads was filmed with the GH5 and the Leica 10-25mm f/1.7. If I remember correctly, most of the b-roll and detail shots were filmed with the GH5 and 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron lens. The thumbnail was also shot with that lens.
@@ValentinKossenko I love your videos. Thank you. Can you say with confidence you love the gh6 for your camera over full frame. I want the versatile setup for streaming and TH-cam podcasts but also something that can go outside and do amazing things too. What say you 😂
@@Christiantheone If you know how to maximize the GH6's performance, you can get outstanding results. With great power comes great responsibility though and there's a lot that can go wrong with the GH6 if you don't know how to properly use it. I love the format though and wouldn't exchange it for anything else at this point in time.
@@ValentinKossenko ok last couple questions and I think I'm ready to bite. 1. What great power and responsibility things are you meaning... For example. 2. What is the very best lens you can recommend for streaming.
The 7-14 is great but doesn't allow any screw on filters, which is why I have decided to not include it in this review. Still a great lens if you're fine with an adapted solution though!
@@ValentinKossenko yeah it's true... wo screw in filters it starts with a huge con. fortunately I don't really need filters for it in most of times. but I agree with you in this regard
Because I have owned Lumix cameras for 10yrs I already owned the 12-35 f2.8 mk1and 35-100 f2.8 mk1and the 100-300 then added the leica 25 f1.4 and the leica 15 f1.7 and the Nocticron 42.5 f1.2. I kept thinking that I needed the Leica 12mm but eventually settled on a used Samyang 12mm f2.0 (for 1/4 of the cost of the leica) I owned all these before the Leica 10-25 was released so I couldn’t justify the expense of the 10-25 but I could justify the Laowa 7.5 f2.0! Then this year I was expecting a couple of low light gigs (which obviously didn’t happen) and a Standard Zoom with a wide aperture would be the better option . . . . . . . Maybe the Leica 10-25 . . . . . But No, I chose the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 and Viltrox Speed booster combo because I paid less than £700 for both (new) and because I can achieve an aperture of f1.3 and I only intend using it for Video.
The Sigma 18-35 + Viltrox EF-M2 is definitely a great "low budget" alternative if you can't afford the Leica 10-25. I have used the Sigma with Metabones Speedbooster XL for years and it always gave me great results. I think that the 10-25 is still a lot better though, because it goes even wider and has great native autofocus for photography.
It's hard to beat the Olympus Pro 7-14 f2.8 even if i does not take filters and flares easily (problem basically avoided by shading the sun with one hand during the outdoors) . Especially for darker environments. Also the Olympus Pro 8 mm f1.8 fisheye is a great wide angle lens with super low light capability. That said I'm really looking forward to the new 9 mm f1.7 for gimbal work. Sadly it has been delayed until october. I guess I have GAS. :-p
The 7-14 is definitely a great lens as well. I understand that you could probably work around the missing filter thread, but I like my camera gear to be as convenient as possible. I have sold most of my lenses by now and only own the 10-25, 25-50, 50-200 and 12-60 right now and I think I'll sell the last two as well. The 10-25 and 25-50 is just the perfect combo for most stuff I do, albeit a very expensive one. We're in the same boat with GAS I guess, but I'm trying to work against it right now as much as possible!
@@ValentinKossenko I picked up the 10-25 on my way to the IFA show in Berlin last week. Great low light capabilities for the indoors at the Messe Berlin halls. Guess I have to go for the 25-50 as well. Seems like it sold out at MediaMarkt and also the Panasonic summer cash back is over.
The Sigma is great but I definitely prefer the 10-25. It is lighter and has a bigger focal length coverage. Then there's also autofocus, the manual aperture ring and smooth auto exposure in videos. Overall it's just a great lens that I can highly recommend. It's my absolute favorite and I use it for most of my video / photo work. Thanks for your feedback!
It is big but not as heavy as it looks. If you can afford it, I can really highly recomment that lens. Never go in debt though. If you're starting out, there are a lot cheaper lenses that will do just fine.
Great lens for sure, but the protruding element makes use of filters a little more complicated as you need a separate system and can not use any screw on filters.
@@weizenobstmusli8232 You're totally right when it comes to photography. If that's all you do, you can absolutely work around the need to use any filters by using bracketing, et cetera.
It's not a bad lens but has a protruding lens element just like the Olympus 7-14, which is the reason why I didn't include it here. Attaching ND filters, polarizers, etc. is very important for many people when it comes to wide angle lenses. Still a great lens though!
You're right. But this is not the Laowa's fault. It happens with all of the lenses I show in this video too. This is due to the IBIS inside of the GH5. If you disable it and use a gimbal instead, this won't be a problem.
What's up everyone, I tried somewhat different lighting for this video and actually kinda liked experimenting with it to achieve a more dramatic look. What do you think about the low key lighting in this video? Dig it or hate it?
Anyways, I hope you enjoy the video!
nice rembrandt lighting, I like it :)
You probably dont give a shit but does someone know a trick to get back into an instagram account??
I was stupid forgot the account password. I would love any help you can give me
@Daniel Lance Instablaster =)
@@daniellance6892 Have you tried resetting your password already? You can normally recover a forgotten password by phone number or email if I'm not mistaken.
Selling my tokina and the viltrox to get the 8-18mm. Native compatibility just makes everything more intuitive and enjoyable. Thanks for the video!
I can relate to that and feel the same!
The PL 10-25 & the Nocticron are the 2 star lenses in MFT. Great video!
I agree. The 10-25 is probably my most favorite lens of all time. I just wish the Nocticron had a little less chromatic aberrations and proper weather sealing.
I would also consider the Olympus 7-14 f/2.8
I absolutely agree. The 7-14 is an outstanding lens but I didn't include it this review because it doesn't allow any screw on filters. If you're fine with an adapted solution, it is no problem though. For video work, the Leica 10-25 just feels the best in terms of features.
I bought the 10-25 after watching your first review video on it 👍🏼
I sincerely hope you're enjoying the lens! Thanks for leaving a comment!
Canon 10-18 is pretty good, I must say. Silent IS.
It's a great lens for the prive. But if you want to use it on the GH5 with a focal reducer, you need to modify the mount of it for it to function properly. There is a slight risk of damage though, so I wouldn't advise doing that.
crazy review, so detail angle, love it
I'm glad you liked it! :)
What's the IS of 8-18 mm?
Nice vid, great information and production value!
Question though: I love wide angle lenses for video, but when do they make sense for photography? I almost always get too much objects in my frame, distracting from the subject..... And for the one or two times something really big pops up, would a panorama not be enough?
Thank you for your feedback! If you have the time to create a panorama, you'll be fine with almost any regular wide lens too. This takes additional time and effort in post though, which is why I personally still use ultra wide angle lenses like these, even for photography. Since I also shoot quite many videos, ultra wide angle lenses have a very special place in my kit. If you're interested in the other gear I use for my videos, you can check my full gear list right here: kit.co/valentinkossenko.
hi @Valentin Kossenko. Hope I get a reply. I am planning to by Micro four thirds Panasonic BGH1 (Netflix approved). As per you Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 is the best. May I know if Panasonic BGH1 + Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 is a good combination to make films for theatre and Netflix or similar. I am able to get theory but since I am not a cinematographer myself I am not able to understand. All I am looking for is to make independent movies and pitch it to Netflix or similar or for theatrical release. 1) How does the combination Panasonic BGH1 + Panasonic Leica 10-25mm f/1.7 workout ? Please let me know. 2) Is the cropping good and look more like a movie view ?
Yeah, that'd be a great combination. The 10-25 f/1.7 is great for cinematography as it offers a real manual focusing ring, has minimal breathing and enough bokeh and separation for some cinematic sequences.
what lens did you film the talking part on?
I used the 10-25mm f/1.7 for the talking part here.
Hi good and interesting review. I wouldn't call the 10-25 ultra-wide, but I understand why you included it in your comparison. I use the Panasonic 7-14 for wider photos and video. I use the excellent PVGear adapter which allows screw on filters to be attached (I use a variable ND), which overcomes one of the drawbacks of the lens often mentioned by reviewers, including yourself. I don't think it would have scored highly in your comparison because of the criteria you used, and that's fair enough because the lenses you chose all have better features in some respects, but if you don't need a fast aperture (say mostly outdoor landscape) then the 7-14 should not be overlooked as an option as it's smaller, lighter has good autofocus, is a pleasure to use and is great value for money if it meets your needs. 🙂
I absolutely agree with every single point. Thank you so much for your addition to this comments section!
I have the 8-18 but I've been really wanting that 10-25 for low light shooting.
The 10-25 is an awesome piece of glass. I actually prefer it over the Sigma 18-35 and use it as my main lens for mostly everything.
Please don't overlook the Olympus Zuiko Pro 7-14 f2.8. My wideangle workhorse. Love it.
I didn't overlook it and it's definitely a great lens if you don't necessarily need any regular screw on filters and you're fine with adapted solutions. In the beginning of this review I also talk about the reasons, why I have chosen these lenses for the review and comparison. Hope that makes sense! Thanks for your comment! 😊
@@ValentinKossenko Good point. The major drawback is that you can't simply screw on an ND or other filters. The filter holders available seem to clunky for my workflow. I learned to work around that, as I love the Oly pro series for MFT, in particular for the focus ring clutch.
Awesome video :)
Thank you! 😊
Hi! Very nice review. Thorough and consistent. I would argue with weights assigned to each categories, but it is subjective. I would also argue that assigning points based on AoV range rather than on focal range when comparing ultra wide angle lenses is more reasonable. I don't own neither of these lenses, but I consider them all when I was in a market for such lenses. I need lens to film a choir from a close distance in dimmly lit interiors. I thaought I need wider possible lens and zoom as sometimes I cannot move the camera freely, that is why I excluded lenses such as Laowa 7.5 and Voigtlander 10.5 (which sucks BTW). I need constant apeture. That is why I excluded Leica 8-16mm. I need fast apeture that is why I excluded Lumix 7-14mm. I have tried breifly Tokina 11-20 with Viltrox but I was not blown away by the IQ, although it was OK. I decided on Olympus 7-14mm. But it turned out that sihlouettes on the edge of the frame on any rectilinear lens look eerie stretched. They started to look OK from about 10mm M43. The most usefull range is 10-14mm M43. BTW Olympus is not that great against direct sources of light. That is why Leica 10-25mm appear on a table. But its darn expensive! I don't have a budget for that. So I started to think about Tokina 14-20 f/2.0. With Viltrox it would provide 10-14 f/1.4 M43 equivalent. And it is said to be very sharp. Would you be willing to test it on GH5 someday? Maybe it can be loaned? Noone has ever tested this setup. And comparing it to Leica 10-25 f/1.7 would be very interesting.
Thank you so much for your comment, Paweł! I agree with your points on AoV for the most part. This is still a somewhat subjective opinion as it's kind of hard to decide whether biggest AoV is worth more than overall focal length coverage. The Tokina is ever so slightly wider than the 8-18, but the sharpness, optical performance and overall zoom range is a lot worse. I would love to test the Tokina 14-20 f/2.0 for you, but at the moment I still have two more lenses (42.5mm f/1.2 & 50-200mm f/2.8-f/4 + 2X TC) that need to be reviewed before that. Since I am doing all of this aside my main job as a facebook marketing specialist, I have only limited amount of time to work on new videos. I would love to do this full time, which is why I am currently also working on the Content Creator Circle, a course for creators. I understand that the price for the Leica 10-25 is quite high, but nonetheless I can highly recommend it and think that it will be very hard to find a good replacement for it. Lenstip did a great review on that lens as well, which you should definitely give a read if you haven't already. It's optical performance is outstanding throughout the zoom range. This is very rare for such a lens and reminds me of the reviews of the Sigma 18-35 when it first came out. Although the Sigma 18-35 is a tiny bit better in low light with a focal reducer, the Leica 10-25 offers better overall focal length coverage, a manual aperture ring as well as smooth auto exposure in videos, which is just great. This might sound like I am sponsored by Panasonic or Lumix, but I can assure you that I'm not. There's nothing like this lens, that's all. It's expensive, but definitely worth it in my opinion.
@@ValentinKossenko It doesn't sound sponsored to me. I am polish. I read all the tests in polish on optyczne.pl which is the original full version of lenstip.com I agree that Leica 10-25 is in every way better that Tokina + Sigma + speedbooster except for the apeture. But I wonder wheter Tokina is just good enough as it can be found in aftermarket for a fraction of the Leica's price and Sigma's focal range is less critical for me. I would use manual focus in such scenarios anyway. So far I will try hunting for second-hand Leica.
"look eerie stretched" - That's basically a function of the ultra wide FOV. Today, for video work you should probably acquire the new Panasonic 9 mm f1.7.
I wish you compared the lenses to the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Art Lens with the Metabones Speedbooster. :)
The Sigma 18-35 + focal reducer is roughly 25-50mm in terms of full frame equivalence. Since this is nowhere near ultra wide angle territory I decided to test these three lenses instead. I have compared the Sigma to the Leica 10-25 in past videos though, so if you're interested in that, you can watch these videos on my channel.
What is your camera setup for this video
The talking heads was filmed with the GH5 and the Leica 10-25mm f/1.7. If I remember correctly, most of the b-roll and detail shots were filmed with the GH5 and 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron lens. The thumbnail was also shot with that lens.
@@ValentinKossenko I love your videos. Thank you. Can you say with confidence you love the gh6 for your camera over full frame. I want the versatile setup for streaming and TH-cam podcasts but also something that can go outside and do amazing things too. What say you 😂
@@Christiantheone If you know how to maximize the GH6's performance, you can get outstanding results. With great power comes great responsibility though and there's a lot that can go wrong with the GH6 if you don't know how to properly use it. I love the format though and wouldn't exchange it for anything else at this point in time.
Oh, and thanks for your feedback. I really appreciate it!
@@ValentinKossenko ok last couple questions and I think I'm ready to bite. 1. What great power and responsibility things are you meaning... For example. 2. What is the very best lens you can recommend for streaming.
the first is came to my mind: where is the Zuiko 7-14?
but... I am pretty sure that 10-25 is a beast.
The 7-14 is great but doesn't allow any screw on filters, which is why I have decided to not include it in this review. Still a great lens if you're fine with an adapted solution though!
@@ValentinKossenko yeah it's true... wo screw in filters it starts with a huge con. fortunately I don't really need filters for it in most of times.
but I agree with you in this regard
Because I have owned Lumix cameras for 10yrs I already owned the 12-35 f2.8 mk1and 35-100 f2.8 mk1and the 100-300 then added the leica 25 f1.4 and the leica 15 f1.7 and the Nocticron 42.5 f1.2. I kept thinking that I needed the Leica 12mm but eventually settled on a used Samyang 12mm f2.0 (for 1/4 of the cost of the leica)
I owned all these before the Leica 10-25 was released so I couldn’t justify the expense of the 10-25 but I could justify the Laowa 7.5 f2.0!
Then this year I was expecting a couple of low light gigs (which obviously didn’t happen) and a Standard Zoom with a wide aperture would be the better option . . . . . . . Maybe the Leica 10-25 . . . . . But No, I chose the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 and Viltrox Speed booster combo because I paid less than £700 for both (new) and because I can achieve an aperture of f1.3 and I only intend using it for Video.
The Sigma 18-35 + Viltrox EF-M2 is definitely a great "low budget" alternative if you can't afford the Leica 10-25. I have used the Sigma with Metabones Speedbooster XL for years and it always gave me great results. I think that the 10-25 is still a lot better though, because it goes even wider and has great native autofocus for photography.
It's hard to beat the Olympus Pro 7-14 f2.8 even if i does not take filters and flares easily (problem basically avoided by shading the sun with one hand during the outdoors) . Especially for darker environments. Also the Olympus Pro 8 mm f1.8 fisheye is a great wide angle lens with super low light capability. That said I'm really looking forward to the new 9 mm f1.7 for gimbal work. Sadly it has been delayed until october. I guess I have GAS. :-p
The 7-14 is definitely a great lens as well. I understand that you could probably work around the missing filter thread, but I like my camera gear to be as convenient as possible. I have sold most of my lenses by now and only own the 10-25, 25-50, 50-200 and 12-60 right now and I think I'll sell the last two as well. The 10-25 and 25-50 is just the perfect combo for most stuff I do, albeit a very expensive one. We're in the same boat with GAS I guess, but I'm trying to work against it right now as much as possible!
@@ValentinKossenko I picked up the 10-25 on my way to the IFA show in Berlin last week. Great low light capabilities for the indoors at the Messe Berlin halls. Guess I have to go for the 25-50 as well. Seems like it sold out at MediaMarkt and also the Panasonic summer cash back is over.
Nice Video as always! I'm not sure if I should sell the Sigma 18-35 and buy the Panasonic 10-25 though :D
The Sigma is great but I definitely prefer the 10-25. It is lighter and has a bigger focal length coverage. Then there's also autofocus, the manual aperture ring and smooth auto exposure in videos. Overall it's just a great lens that I can highly recommend. It's my absolute favorite and I use it for most of my video / photo work. Thanks for your feedback!
if i don't have to worry about budget i'd get 10-25mm f1.7 such a unique focal range at wide aperture, just too big for my liking.
It is big but not as heavy as it looks. If you can afford it, I can really highly recomment that lens. Never go in debt though. If you're starting out, there are a lot cheaper lenses that will do just fine.
Optically the Oly 7-14 pro is unbeatable.
Great lens for sure, but the protruding element makes use of filters a little more complicated as you need a separate system and can not use any screw on filters.
@@ValentinKossenko , yes. But imho you don't need filters in most photography cases. Just use exposure braketing for high contrast situations.
@@weizenobstmusli8232 You're totally right when it comes to photography. If that's all you do, you can absolutely work around the need to use any filters by using bracketing, et cetera.
You forgot the Sigma 8-16 + 0.71X!
It's not a bad lens but has a protruding lens element just like the Olympus 7-14, which is the reason why I didn't include it here. Attaching ND filters, polarizers, etc. is very important for many people when it comes to wide angle lenses. Still a great lens though!
The laowa 7.5mm is not that good with the gh5 because of the warping issues😂
You're right. But this is not the Laowa's fault. It happens with all of the lenses I show in this video too. This is due to the IBIS inside of the GH5. If you disable it and use a gimbal instead, this won't be a problem.
Cant wait for the day, u‘ll switch to canon 😍 😂😂
You'll have to wait a little longer.. 😂