The plaintiffs are suing for the refund of a deposit on a puppy. The defendant claims the plaintiffs even tried to dispute the charges on their credit cards and lost. Case 29-187
I knew I recognized the defendant! Im not losing it haha. Thanks for the episode name! I wonder which case was first. I wonder if Judges ever recognize or remember situations like this, where theyve been there before.
So lets talk about how the defendant tried to say there was a “language” barrier when dealing with a black woman who’s first language is English... her prejudice almost slipped out.
@Richard Layton - look up the people's court episode "husky fuss" - same defendant being sued by another lady of color - she's the worse kind of prejudice.
The couple are too cute! The breeder is ridiculous thinking she can keep their money or not providing a dog. Her argument was illogical as they come...
@Trini Dazzling Henry it was not so much providing a puppy, not a dog, it was the the Plaintiff was undecided that night, she paid the deposit, did not read the contract. She also followed the defendant's unprofessional and illegal advice to the plaintiff to fight the credit card company, knowing they would lose, and got angry cause then the Plaintiff came back to her to work out the problem. The defendant spent the money and did not want to admit it to the plaintiff. Now she has to go to work to pay the $500.00 back the the plaintiff. Stupidity reigns with puppy mills breeders.
@Jasmine Tyra, the Plaintiff paid the down payment and changed her mind due to a home situation. It was in the episode. I think you were not paying attention to the situation at all. The Defendant was being a con, cause I bet she ran a puppy mill. So sad for the puppies and glad the Plaintiff got her money back from the unprofessional puppy mill breeder. Very unprofessional and no contract. Defendant will be on notice with the authorities for her illegal puppy mill.
Startrek1965 How did I not pay attention?? The whole point of my comment was they did not have a signed contract for her to refuse the Plaintiff a refund.
How she gonna tell her she can’t resell her dog she decided to buy, how’s she gonna keep the money and not give her a puppy. That lady is mean you could see it in her eyes.
UK MedicFRCS We heard her say that over and over u donut....but then she should have given the money back wo having to be sued. Hope this ruins her business cause she’s nasty
@@rod22lt And you need to learn to read. Maybe this conversation is too difficult for your limited comprehension. I didn't say a word about a contract. I was simply stating why ( whether she was right or wrong ) she didn't feel she needed to return the deposit. Maybe you should get a carer to help you when you venture outdoors. Those ' walk, don't walk ' signs can be pretty tricky.
Kelly was on another episode when a plaintiff had brought her dog to Kelly’s doggy daycare & the dog had got a hole in his paw & she talked about how much she loved the dog
After this episode, the other episode (husky fuss) she was on, the death of the puppy in her care, and being cited for inhumane treatment of animals it’s no wonder Kelly Jo Strabley lost her license to operate.
So this woman willingly came on tv for both of these cases?! Did she think she would win? I guess if she thought she was right, then she saw no problem.
The defendant is delusional, and it was confirmed by Doug's interview. (P.S. The husband of the plaintiff is a kick with his maxims, bromides and words of wisdom!)
Bromides? That doesn’t fit the sentence. Stop using a thesaurus in feeble attempts to sound intelligent. It doesn’t work if you cannot use the word effectively in a sentence. Maybe you should look up examples first. Bromides are the opposite of maxims.
I watched this around the time it was uploaded and I’m back just to say that this same defendant was served again for a dog getting a big hole in their arm. She just doesn’t care about the dogs.
Just imagine coming to pick up your dog just to be given an urn filled with what’s left of your pup. Lord knows getting physical isn’t right but I think I would’ve been ready to brawl!
@Lauren Reid what urn? They put down a deposit for a puppy and changed their minds. They were conned by illegal puppy dog breeder. They got their money back. Wrong case.
@@kiajames7737 What urn? There was a puppy and the couple put down a deposit and had to change their mind and no contract. The illegal puppy mill breeder had to pay the deposit back.
I never said anything about an urn but the case said they cremated the dog after .. ashes would be placed in an urn I think Kia James used that as an example. Yes it was specifically about the puppy deposit but the story of the dogs death in her care was beyond unsettling
I might be crazy... but this defendant was on another case where she was being sued by a dog owner for injuries that occurred while at her dog daycare... that is concerning
The defendant is a total Karen. "No refunds" even though there was no contract, AND she can't even give them a puppy? Right after their family tragedy?? Not to mention the only reason that she has to worry about them trying to "flip" (resell) a puppy is because SHE put them in the position where they *have* to get a puppy because they're not getting their money back from her. You can't have your cake and eat it too. She practically stole that money from them.
I love Judge Milian... she's my fave . She's smart and fair. Loved how this case turned out. That pet shop owner is going to reap every bad act she sows. Thank God!!!
@Andrea Skinner she was mad that the couple changed their mind, despite a no contract, and wanted their money back when she would not let them buy a future puppy. Shady illegal puppy mill breeder. All for the money, sad for the mother dog.
Wait.... 🗣 someones dog was mauled in her care, she lied to the dog owners about how their dog died, then had the dog cremated -- WHO DOES THAT 😳😳😳 THE DEFENDANT IS APESH!+ CRAZY 🤦🏾♀️🙄
That woman from paws and claws is shifty! Breaks my heart that she’s the caretaker for helpless creatures that can’t speak up. That owner is a real life modern day Dr.Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. Wild!
I hope people refrain from doing business with the defendant. This is the second time I’ve seen her on the people’s court, as a defendant. She’s just bad business.
Dog breeders make me mad, breeders are ruthless and it’s just their “business “, it’s not about the love of their dogs. This is just another reason not to get your dog from a breeder....quit being dog snobs people. Go to the shelter. They need homes and love too.
I live in Hungary and people here adopt animals from shelters most of the time. I went last year to the shelter in my town and they only had 5 dogs for adoption and it was on a weekend when they had visiting days from children who can't have them home but their parents pay for the dogs maintenance. I was very happy to see that, here there are very few breeders since people definitely prefer to adopt.
There are alot of great breeders and nothing wrong with wanting a purebred puppy not often found in shelters. I have standard dachshund from a breeder, worth every penny. Also keep in mind some rescues make it difficult to adopt and often have a waitlist.and make you jump through hoops to get a dog.
The defendant got caught lying so many times her pants almost caught on fire. Notice how she said she implied that she didn't use her phone when the plaintiff came to the store. The first thing you saw when the plaintiff's video was shown in court was the defendant recording with her phone😂😂😂
I’ve watched her court back to back and just realised this defendant is the same woman being sued on peoples court from another lady who had her dog paw cut deeply in her care.
The look on the plaintiffs face when the defendant claimed there was a language barrier…I felt so terrible for her. She was uncomfortable listening to that comment, you could see it in her face. The defendant is despicable. The pet resort that the defendant owns is the same facility where a dog was mauled to death. Her reaction to this incident was to lie to the owners and say the dog died of a brain aneurysm, and have the dogs body cremated without their consent to get rid of the evidence of her negligence. So not only is her racism showing, but she’s also a liar and a crook.
This is Kelly's second appearance on the People's Court. The first time was in the episode Not Caring Enough when the plantiffs husky left her facility with a hole in its arm. Kelly said she knew nothing of it and won the case because of a clause in her contract. Seeing her again tells me all I need to know about this lady. Smh.
Good God, I feel bad for those dogs. The defendant is a scam artist. The plaintiff was entitled to her money since the defendant refused to give the dog to her
This defendant is no good. I saw her on another episode of this show where another person had sued her for an injury to their dog at her pet resort. Why does she keep getting sued?
I just watched another episode with this lady where a dog came home with a hole in his paw and had to get stitches, this lady's business practices are shady as hell... She's keeping deposits, selling sick pups, lying about dead dogs and letting dogs in her care get hurt... What a peach!🙄
It's always important to check the business's reputation before giving them your money. I check reviews before buying a product, hotels, restaurants, traveling, etc; I love peoples reviews because they let you know exactly what to expect. What saved the plaintiffs in this case they didn't sign any contract. There nothing like having a peace of mind.
The comment she said about there being a language barrier was so incredibly prejudice. That was so infuriating, I wish the judge would have been aware of how nasty that comment was.
How can she say the couple doesn't deserve a dog, but she lied about how a dog died in her care. What a HORRIBLE person and business owner. I hope her business tanks after this and she can no longer breed.
The defendant was also sued on “husky fuss” episode.
You the GOAT, thanks for the episode title!
I knew I wasn’t going crazy I knew I saw her before
Paws and Claes Country club and resort.
I knew I recognized the defendant! Im not losing it haha. Thanks for the episode name! I wonder which case was first. I wonder if Judges ever recognize or remember situations like this, where theyve been there before.
Maybe she's trying to make a name for herself?
So lets talk about how the defendant tried to say there was a “language” barrier when dealing with a black woman who’s first language is English... her prejudice almost slipped out.
THAT PART!! My parents are both from the Caribbean. They are NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKERS. People try it all the time when they're angry.
@Richard Layton - look up the people's court episode "husky fuss" - same defendant being sued by another lady of color - she's the worse kind of prejudice.
@@ThePracticalDog Wow!!!
Almost? Na it definitely slipped
Oooh a prejudice "Lesbian"
Not that there is anything wrong with that.....LOL
“you see what happens when you come to court, you lose” 😭😭
LoReeser Ware I’m convinced they take courses on how to be petty. 🤣
😂 I loved that part
@@kiajames7737 I think thy do! lol
Specifically That defendant with her shady ways loses
lmfaooo I screamed when he said that
No signed contract, no dog. Give her back her money!
What business do either have trading a deposit without a signed contract?
Exactly!!!!!
Right!!!
😂😂😂
If there was a signed contract the plaintiffs would have lost.
The defendant is a horrible person. I feel sorry for any dog she breeds.
I would'nt even buy an apple from that woman!
Me too!
No one should be breeding anyway
Yes, I noticed that too.
That defendant constantly appears here defending various bad behaviors.
The couple are too cute! The breeder is ridiculous thinking she can keep their money or not providing a dog. Her argument was illogical as they come...
I thought that too, good looking couple!
@Trini Dazzling Henry it was not so much providing a puppy, not a dog, it was the the Plaintiff was undecided that night, she paid the deposit, did not read the contract. She also followed the defendant's unprofessional and illegal advice to the plaintiff to fight the credit card company, knowing they would lose, and got angry cause then the Plaintiff came back to her to work out the problem. The defendant spent the money and did not want to admit it to the plaintiff. Now she has to go to work to pay the $500.00 back the the plaintiff. Stupidity reigns with puppy mills breeders.
As they always come. 🙄
You can look at the defendant and tell there is malice. Its so telling....smdh
Her 3rd time on ppls court
You mean after hearing them explain their side? Cause it’s hard to judge people by their appearance alone!😮
Kelly (the defendant) is despicable. I hope future customers see this case and decide against doing business with her. 😒😐🙅🏾♀️
@prettyblkgyrl74, puppy mills are brought to justice these days. This was such a case of a puppy mill going bad before it began.
Defendant is pretty much scamming people.
She has been sued several times for mistreating dogs and responsible for the deaths of a couple too. Madness.
@@dunners664 are you serious? She just appeared again in another lawsuit 🙄
STOP DOING BUSINESS WITH THIS LADY OR PREPARE YOURSELF TO BE ON THE SHOW
The husband is adorable! He was there by his wife's side!
His expressions are cracking me up.
Sure was.
It went on the media fat white karen
@@kimberlyhampton5332 his facial expressions were annoying, lol.
❤
Girl, after all of that you say she doesn’t have a signed contract. Pay the people. The Defendant had a bad vibe about her
@Jasmine Tyra, the Plaintiff paid the down payment and changed her mind due to a home situation. It was in the episode. I think you were not paying attention to the situation at all. The Defendant was being a con, cause I bet she ran a puppy mill. So sad for the puppies and glad the Plaintiff got her money back from the unprofessional puppy mill breeder. Very unprofessional and no contract. Defendant will be on notice with the authorities for her illegal puppy mill.
Startrek1965 How did I not pay attention?? The whole point of my comment was they did not have a signed contract for her to refuse the Plaintiff a refund.
@@JasmineTiya lol girl same thing I said did all that without a signed contract
This is her 3rd court case
@@stephaniehowe0973 I just saw another case also with the same defendants.
How she gonna tell her she can’t resell her dog she decided to buy, how’s she gonna keep the money and not give her a puppy. That lady is mean you could see it in her eyes.
Because she cares about her dogs.
UK MedicFRCS We heard her say that over and over u donut....but then she should have given the money back wo having to be sued. Hope this ruins her business cause she’s nasty
@@rod22lt Non refundable deposit. Look up the definition.
UK MedicFRCS Plaintiff didn’t sign the contract so um...THERE IS NO CONTRACT. You’re clueless
@@rod22lt And you need to learn to read. Maybe this conversation is too difficult for your limited comprehension. I didn't say a word about a contract. I was simply stating why ( whether she was right or wrong ) she didn't feel she needed to return the deposit. Maybe you should get a carer to help you when you venture outdoors. Those ' walk, don't walk ' signs can be pretty tricky.
Once I heard that the defendant had a history of mistreatment and lying when it comes to selling dogs, that was it for me. What a snake
Kelly was on another episode when a plaintiff had brought her dog to Kelly’s doggy daycare & the dog had got a hole in his paw & she talked about how much she loved the dog
I watched that episode yesterday, she extra shady
Yeah I couldnt count all the stitches like 8.
My son was little & got hit in the head w a rock only 3 stitches
I just finished that episode and when this one autoplayed, I was looking like "didn't I just see her" lol
Right!
@@xXLilSmurthXx me too smh
The husband quoted a Bible verse. Everytime that I live by this verse of scripture, it ALWAYS works out in my favor. God bless him and his family!
That strong, silent man standing so proud next to his wife. Love it so much! Overcome evil with good, y'all!! 😭😭
The husband was so excited to be there 😅
lol
🤣🤣🤣
After this episode, the other episode (husky fuss) she was on, the death of the puppy in her care, and being cited for inhumane treatment of animals it’s no wonder Kelly Jo Strabley lost her license to operate.
She did?! Oh thank goodness!
So this woman willingly came on tv for both of these cases?! Did she think she would win? I guess if she thought she was right, then she saw no problem.
I thought defendant look like I’d seen her before
Good. Contracts shouldn’t be able to absolve negligence.
She is actually the defendant on 3 cases that I've counted
The defendent is shady and money hungry eww
Aww the plaintiffs are so cute. You can see the moments when he tried to calm his wife down from talking over the defendants.
PREACH ON PLANTIFF'S HUSBAND! "Flee from the devil..." haha
🙌🏾😊
The defendant is delusional, and it was confirmed by Doug's interview. (P.S. The husband of the plaintiff is a kick with his maxims, bromides and words of wisdom!)
Well said.
K love You don’t even know what he said. You just know that it goes well with butter biscuits.
Bromides? That doesn’t fit the sentence. Stop using a thesaurus in feeble attempts to sound intelligent. It doesn’t work if you cannot use the word effectively in a sentence. Maybe you should look up examples first. Bromides are the opposite of maxims.
straight from the Bible!
"Don't be overcomed by evil but overcome evil with good!"
I watched this around the time it was uploaded and I’m back just to say that this same defendant was served again for a dog getting a big hole in their arm. She just doesn’t care about the dogs.
The defendant sounds evil. When she lied about the dog and cremated the dog without getting the families permission my heart broke.
Please keep posting these!! They’re so entertaining
Victoria: It distracts from the virus and the failed stimulus talks, job loses, etc.
So refreshing to see someone use the correct “they’re”!
D true😂 but auto correct also assisted in that 💁♀️
Victoria Rodrigues Hahahha!
@@DE-ey9lb And periods too!
THE HUSBAND IS PURE!!! cracking up cause he knows she’s a smart cookie
These folks should have done their research about her BEFORE they went to visit the puppies.
Why those people were not the ones originally burying a dog. The sister in law was.
That poor dog in her care that was mauled and done with without their family aware that is disgusting
Just imagine coming to pick up your dog just to be given an urn filled with what’s left of your pup. Lord knows getting physical isn’t right but I think I would’ve been ready to brawl!
Kia James and that Raggety disgusting lady would have been more than happy to play the victim and see you get handcuffed . Evil lady.
@Lauren Reid what urn? They put down a deposit for a puppy and changed their minds. They were conned by illegal puppy dog breeder. They got their money back. Wrong case.
@@kiajames7737 What urn? There was a puppy and the couple put down a deposit and had to change their mind and no contract. The illegal puppy mill breeder had to pay the deposit back.
I never said anything about an urn but the case said they cremated the dog after .. ashes would be placed in an urn I think Kia James used that as an example. Yes it was specifically about the puppy deposit but the story of the dogs death in her care was beyond unsettling
Cute couple 🙏🏾 glad they got their money back ! The defendant was SHIESTY . Period
I liked her husband he was a cool guy lol .
I didn't like the way he put his hand over her mouth when she started to speak, very disrespectful.
Sandra Irick thought I was the only one who caught it !
@@londonirene Me too!
He seemed odd to me
@@SISI-q1l he was doing it so they wouldnt lose their case by talkin over the judge
And we have to share our air with these people😭 poor lady and her family
I might be crazy... but this defendant was on another case where she was being sued by a dog owner for injuries that occurred while at her dog daycare... that is concerning
She’s in another episode called husky fuss
And someone said her license is revoked so no more doggie breeding,
selling for her
She had three cases
@@shesheaaa8098 What are the other two?
The defendant is a total Karen. "No refunds" even though there was no contract, AND she can't even give them a puppy? Right after their family tragedy?? Not to mention the only reason that she has to worry about them trying to "flip" (resell) a puppy is because SHE put them in the position where they *have* to get a puppy because they're not getting their money back from her. You can't have your cake and eat it too. She practically stole that money from them.
Defendant is slime
I love Judge Milian... she's my fave . She's smart and fair. Loved how this case turned out. That pet shop owner is going to reap every bad act she sows. Thank God!!!
How did she think that she was going to keep their money and not give them a dog???? I wouldn't want anything from her anyway.....SMH!!!
@Andrea Skinner she was mad that the couple changed their mind, despite a no contract, and wanted their money back when she would not let them buy a future puppy. Shady illegal puppy mill breeder. All for the money, sad for the mother dog.
This is the 2nd case involving Kelly I've seen today, she must get sued alot
I’m here from the new episode the defendant is on. Someone might need to shut her down
The defendant is being sued left and right. She's been on this show multiple times.
Wait.... 🗣 someones dog was mauled in her care, she lied to the dog owners about how their dog died, then had the dog cremated -- WHO DOES THAT 😳😳😳
THE DEFENDANT IS APESH!+ CRAZY 🤦🏾♀️🙄
maled, not mailed.
Startrek1965 it's actually MAULED... autocorrect tripped me up. What's your excuse for being LOUD &&&& WRONG 😘😂
Well how else can you lie about it having a seizure, she was like let’s burn it so they can’t see the bite marks
Wow could that defendant be any more off-putting?!
That woman from paws and claws is shifty! Breaks my heart that she’s the caretaker for helpless creatures that can’t speak up. That owner is a real life modern day Dr.Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. Wild!
Kelly Jo Strabley lost her license to operate in 2019.
Thats a good husband
Overrated, much?
I hope people refrain from doing business with the defendant. This is the second time I’ve seen her on the people’s court, as a defendant. She’s just bad business.
what a weird business owner
The lady in back of defendants (with the gray wigs) is so fly! I’ve seen her in multiple cases
i said the same thing! Lol
The plaintiffs look like a really nice couple!!!
yes they are my parents lol. I got a puppy in the end yay 😁
I’m glad the plaintiff won!!!
“You see what happens when you come to court, you lose”
I swear I heard
“The more you f@#$ around, the more youre gonna find out” 😫😭😭😭
Why would she care what somebody does with their dogs that they paid for? I think she's just a thief!
The more I heard her say tht the more it pissed me df OFF!!!
Dog breeders make me mad, breeders are ruthless and it’s just their “business “, it’s not about the love of their dogs. This is just another reason not to get your dog from a breeder....quit being dog snobs people. Go to the shelter. They need homes and love too.
I live in Hungary and people here adopt animals from shelters most of the time. I went last year to the shelter in my town and they only had 5 dogs for adoption and it was on a weekend when they had visiting days from children who can't have them home but their parents pay for the dogs maintenance. I was very happy to see that, here there are very few breeders since people definitely prefer to adopt.
👏👏👏👏👏
There are alot of great breeders and nothing wrong with wanting a purebred puppy not often found in shelters. I have standard dachshund from a breeder, worth every penny.
Also keep in mind some rescues make it difficult to adopt and often have a waitlist.and make you jump through hoops to get a dog.
That is exactly how I want to die: covered in puppies.
I love how the defendant took the waddle of shame at the end
Am I the only one who noticed the girl on the right raised her left hand???
@Jay Ro I think it could also be because people are mirroring Douglas when he raises his hand, kind of like the game Simon Says
The people’s court has all the animal involved cases lol
Cause it is a small claims court,.
Startrek1965 judge Mathis is too and he doesn’t have a bunch of pet cases 🙄
Nina A Judge Mathis is for the crackheads lol
All the drug lords and addicts go to mathis
@@pussinnaboot lol true
Somebody ought to revoke this ladies business license!!!
Kelly Jo Strabley lost her license to operate in 2019.
😯 Kelly, the defendant, is a horrible person.
She will have to answer to her maker one day
Doug is a Shade Queen baby and I LOVE it!!!🗣😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😭😭💪🏾
They should make sure her business license is revoked. What a piece of work.
They did.
She lost her license in 2019. 😊❤
Lolol she said they don't deserve it 🤣 huh?! It was their money, no contract was signed and they didn't get a pup... she didn't deserve it 🙄
I love how Judge stops people mid sentence when they try to veer from the question at hand🥰
That defendant is a true piece of work. Saw the news broadcast of her with the puppy “Molly” and she looks like she had no remorse for her actions.
That defendant is so stupid & shady as hell!
Puppy mill breeder.
This women has been sued twice in people’s court and a dog died in her care and lied to the owners she doesn’t deserve business
“You see what happens when you come to court? You lose”🤣🤣🤣
Got em!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
He definitely remembers her from the other case😂
@@kjackson2693 there was another case???!!!😭😭😭
@@riannadominguez396 yes! a husky was in her care and had to get like 8 stitches in his foot
@@kjackson2693 She shouldn’t be in business!😭😭😭😭😭
How did her business legally stay open after the dog was mauled and she lied to the pet owners
How???
The defendant got caught lying so many times her pants almost caught on fire. Notice how she said she implied that she didn't use her phone when the plaintiff came to the store. The first thing you saw when the plaintiff's video was shown in court was the defendant recording with her phone😂😂😂
I’ve watched her court back to back and just realised this defendant is the same woman being sued on peoples court from another lady who had her dog paw cut deeply in her care.
Yup. She is super shady. Scrolling down the comments I just learned that this piece of shit lost her license to operate in 2019.
Pretty gratifying information to read, I must say. I haven’t confirmed it or anything, but it was from multiple different people so who knows ?
The level of education the defendants have.
Side note; I can care less if you have a contract ESPCIALLY if it's not sign😆😂
The look on the plaintiffs face when the defendant claimed there was a language barrier…I felt so terrible for her. She was uncomfortable listening to that comment, you could see it in her face. The defendant is despicable. The pet resort that the defendant owns is the same facility where a dog was mauled to death. Her reaction to this incident was to lie to the owners and say the dog died of a brain aneurysm, and have the dogs body cremated without their consent to get rid of the evidence of her negligence. So not only is her racism showing, but she’s also a liar and a crook.
The defendant is on this show more than Douglas the bailiff 🤣🤣🤣
These plaintiffs are adorable.
This is Kelly's second appearance on the People's Court. The first time was in the episode Not Caring Enough when the plantiffs husky left her facility with a hole in its arm. Kelly said she knew nothing of it and won the case because of a clause in her contract. Seeing her again tells me all I need to know about this lady. Smh.
wow! She is back again. I just hope that no one uses her business again.
Good God, I feel bad for those dogs. The defendant is a scam artist. The plaintiff was entitled to her money since the defendant refused to give the dog to her
Thanks 4 posting 😘
She was PISSED she lost that money. Practically LIVID!
I literally just watched episode with the defendant...At this point she just need to bow 🙇♀️ out gracefully and close down!!!
This defendant has been on people's court more than once !! Wth
Hey anyone notice this Kelly was sued on another episode called “Husky Fuss”...yaaaaaa won’t be taking my Jericho to THAT doggy daycare
There's a lot of rescue dogs, that would love a good home! I know, because we have two and they show their love to us everyday.
SHE GOT THAT KAREN HAIR CUT WHY WOULD YOU BUY A DOG FROM HER
This is the same defendant in the "Husky Fuss" case...TH-cam played these videos back to back lol
All deposits are refundable. If not, it’s called a fee. Bad business owners
This lady’s been sued twice on people’s court. The other one is called husky fuss
Ooouuuu...I JUST posted this and just WATCHED tht 1 before THIS 1 came up😂😂😂
This defendant is no good. I saw her on another episode of this show where another person had sued her for an injury to their dog at her pet resort. Why does she keep getting sued?
Wow the defendant was also on another Peoples Court as a defendant . The episode is called Not Caring Enough.
I just watched another episode with this lady where a dog came home with a hole in his paw and had to get stitches, this lady's business practices are shady as hell... She's keeping deposits, selling sick pups, lying about dead dogs and letting dogs in her care get hurt... What a peach!🙄
"Then she could have did that." It's done that!! Geez, a liar, thief and illiterate as well. What a winner.
This is SKETCHY !!! THE defendant was in this same court on a different case. Regarding her doggy daycare
It's always important to check the business's reputation before giving them your money. I check reviews before buying a product, hotels, restaurants, traveling, etc; I love peoples reviews because they let you know exactly what to expect. What saved the plaintiffs in this case they didn't sign any contract. There nothing like having a peace of mind.
The comment she said about there being a language barrier was so incredibly prejudice. That was so infuriating, I wish the judge would have been aware of how nasty that comment was.
I've seen this defendant in a prior case literally watched it yesterday lol
Y’all!! I was not expecting the turn of effects regarding the mauling of the dog.. 😳 omg seriously
I’m here after watching this defendant lose another case on The People’s Court as the defendant there also. Horrible woman!
Yo, Doug is ruthless, on purpose at that!😩
He is my favorite part of the show LMAO
How can she say the couple doesn't deserve a dog, but she lied about how a dog died in her care. What a HORRIBLE person and business owner. I hope her business tanks after this and she can no longer breed.
The Defendant was sued on another episode Not Caring Enough bc a dog was injured at the facility
This one has been on her fo being sued before. I just watched it on TH-cam yesterday.
Husband quoted Romans 12:21.. love it ♥️