When white moves the f3 knight back to g1 I have found what works well for me is to play a reverse danish gambit for black(e.g. c6). The rationale being that white has given up the benefit of the first move by moving back to the starting square. A key advantage for black is that the kp is already advanced to e4 compared to the danish gambit where the e pawn is an annoying weakness at times.
It might be a bit simple, but when white plays knight to d4 at the start, then supports it with C3, I like to play my bishop to c5, threatening to take the knight and give white an ugly doubled pawn structure that is hard for them to deal with. What do you think of that idea?
Good AfternoonMio! I have a question. When Lasker played 10... Nd5, I think he missed 11. cxb5 Nd4 12. Qd1 f5, white has f3, and when you take, he plays 14. dxe4, and white is now threatening Bc4, and once the queen goes back too, let's say e7, he plays 15. Bc4, and against 15... Be6, he just takes our knight, and when we take the d5 pawn, he goes back to e2 (with the bishop), and claims a pretty comfortable advantage. Is there any other move that could fight for equality (other than the bishop sac)? I await your response!
@@MiodragPerunovicOfficial The timestamp is 3:45. I lost 2 games in 90+30 OTB (guioco piano, today and on Monday) and I am thinking of playing something that will confuse my opponents...
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
Love this style of play. Thanks for another great video!
Thanks Aaron :)
When white moves the f3 knight back to g1 I have found what works well for me is to play a reverse danish gambit for black(e.g. c6). The rationale being that white has given up the benefit of the first move by moving back to the starting square. A key advantage for black is that the kp is already advanced to e4 compared to the danish gambit where the e pawn is an annoying weakness at times.
Good point Tony!
Good Gambit against e4
You should do a video on max lang attack
Didn't know it was called elephant gambit. I love it, looks very scary for passive players
Good point! It is worth of considering for black vs 1.e4 guys!
I like your idea to include anecdotes into your videos.
Thanks :) Even calmed down in the last video when I explained 😉
@5:29 Stockfish suggests white play b5 instead of Qd2 for a neutral position 0.0
I love this gambit. Great content.
Thanks Alvaro!
It might be a bit simple, but when white plays knight to d4 at the start, then supports it with C3, I like to play my bishop to c5, threatening to take the knight and give white an ugly doubled pawn structure that is hard for them to deal with. What do you think of that idea?
Good AfternoonMio! I have a question. When Lasker played 10... Nd5, I think he missed 11. cxb5 Nd4 12. Qd1 f5, white has f3, and when you take, he plays 14. dxe4, and white is now threatening Bc4, and once the queen goes back too, let's say e7, he plays 15. Bc4, and against 15... Be6, he just takes our knight, and when we take the d5 pawn, he goes back to e2 (with the bishop), and claims a pretty comfortable advantage. Is there any other move that could fight for equality (other than the bishop sac)?
I await your response!
Could you please give me moves from beginning? I will answer as soon as you give me exact moves and position
@@MiodragPerunovicOfficial The timestamp is 3:45. I lost 2 games in 90+30 OTB (guioco piano, today and on Monday) and I am thinking of playing something that will confuse my opponents...
Another amazing video. How do you do it?!!!!
Thanks Jay!
What if Nxe5?
You already showed how to play for White and get an advantage, so I don't get the point of this or the title which smacks of hypocrisy. :-)
Good point! 👍