The synod makes perfect sense if you know Soviet history. The main way the Bolsheviks governed was to set up "worker's councils" that theoretically would give their input to the people at the top. In fact, the people at the top ignored the worker's councils and did exactly as they pleased. But the worker's councils gave them the ability to claim that everything they did was in the name of the people, when in fact, it was a scam. The Synod is Francis the Marxist "worker's council".
I don’t like the Synod but that’s pretty far fetched. Pope John Paul placed Francis in Buenos Aires specifically to fight liberation theology so your Marxist idea falls flat
During this pontificate, there nothing that leads to the salvation of souls... Jesus said repent and believe the Good News. The present Magisterium says: let me listen to you so that I can understand you. What is the purpose of this listening to each other without reference to: repent and believe the Good News? Until the Magisterium speaks of the necessity of the salvation of souls through repentance I can only listen to the Deposit of Faith as defended by previous Popes, for the sake of the salvation my own soul and those for whom I pray for.
You: During this pontificate, there nothing that leads to the salvation of souls... Pope Leo XIII: ...the strong and effective instrument of salvation is none other than the Roman Pontificate.
What you have written makes so much sense to me! I’m tired of a pontificate which is constantly trying to find new “interpretations” of the message of the Gospel! As you have said, what we need to do is “repent and believe the Good News.” Period! Perhaps sadly, I have stopped listening to this pope and turn to the Catechism for answers and inspiration.
This is a good short analysis to share with Canadian Synod representatives since we hear little to no Synod skepticism tolerated from parish levels up. Thank you and your guest.
Every body, whether an ecclesial or figurative needs a singular head where the final authority lies. Not a collegial or collective head whereby no decision can be possibly made
New way of being church = not being the church in my mind, and odd form of Anglicanism where allegedly the teachings don't change but the practice changes. So, the teachings become the equivalent of a "living" and evolving thing, like the left likes to do to the constitution. What is so weird is that they do everything but actually proclaim Christ in any full-throated way; in fact taking the recent papal statements to youths or in a better world yutes, it seems quite apparent that the literal meaning of the pope is that he is a universalist. I do not think the pope is honest about his goals. However, he is honest in the optics, the appointments, and the results. For example, not blessing "couples" but photo-ops showing ""couples" getting a blessing, saying such things should be spontaneous when they are clearly arranged for PR purposes in the NY Times. Signing an accord wherein many religions are willed by God, later kind of clarified but then that gets tossed under the bus in the youth meeting and he again doubles down on it later, and zero clarifications, as an "in your eye" kind of treatment. His behavior adds weight to the sometimes proffered cabal for his election as does his kowtowing to Germany and his removal of a certain bishop who basically presented some legitimate criticism. Is there no compunction for Africa, or for millions of other Catholics who find Peter eating exclusively at the Jesuit table? Are some of us just not circumcised the right way for him? It is so odd to have to live through such a time where of all people I feel most estranged from the pope who is the holy father. I think he may be a mental case, somehow deranged, but are not those things the emblem of most Jesuits? Where in all this is the fervor for conversion of the world to the one holy catholic and apostolic faith? Where is the proclamation and leadership and clarity of teaching so desperately needed? It is the tip of an iceberg with this guy and he has not been good for the church in my estimation, the church is not some liberal Jesuit college. These are my mere opinions and I can be wrong, but I am entitled to form them and say them.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and Peace. Pope Francis was legally chosen and accepted widely, but seems to be missing the Grace of this Office, and I've heard a good argument that since VII is filled with statements that go against the Apostolic teaching that has been solid since Christ established Her and against so many solid Magisterial long teaching that it should be removed and that Pope Francis (at least) seems to have been set to change the Church, against his office's Holy Duties, and create a new Modernist Church, against all the [implied] Oaths - intended from before and at Acceptance of his Office that God could not pour into him the Graces of Pope. Something to Consider. Pray for his Repentance and removal of VII, and Justly receiving the Office and those Graces. God Bless., Steve
How utterly ridiculous. The removal of Vatican II! The largest Church gathering ever attended by 2500 Bishops, all the documents passed unanimously. You have no clue what you are talking about if u think Vatican II needs removing.
Sorry, but you have been convinced by the nutty rad trads - you say many things that are totally untrue. You say "VII is filled with statements that go against the Apostolic teaching" - but that is totally false. Beware - many rad trads are not Catholic at all - they are more like Martin Luther than Martin Luther was.
PF is looking 2 change the the lines on the field for both Clergy and Laity ..... De Ranking is the goal ..... Jacobs, ladder is no longer required.....
Since when can a pope invent new sins? The stupid list of synodality sins denigrates the seriousness of real sins which will lead us to hell. This list mocks God's teachings .
All the open inclusive churches I know of are bleeding members, especially men, like mad. And young people are not interested. It is not a winning formula, clearly.
The Sensus Fidei is clearly set out by the ITC in 2014. Your inuendo about how this is being, in some way, changed baffles me. A new way of being Church implies listening, without neccesarily agreeing. Name me one element of doctrine that has been changed under this pontiicate, you can't because it hasnt.
The synod makes perfect sense if you know Soviet history. The main way the Bolsheviks governed was to set up "worker's councils" that theoretically would give their input to the people at the top. In fact, the people at the top ignored the worker's councils and did exactly as they pleased. But the worker's councils gave them the ability to claim that everything they did was in the name of the people, when in fact, it was a scam. The Synod is Francis the Marxist "worker's council".
I don’t like the Synod but that’s pretty far fetched. Pope John Paul placed Francis in Buenos Aires specifically to fight liberation theology so your Marxist idea falls flat
Thank you.
During this pontificate, there nothing that leads to the salvation of souls... Jesus said repent and believe the Good News. The present Magisterium says: let me listen to you so that I can understand you. What is the purpose of this listening to each other without reference to: repent and believe the Good News?
Until the Magisterium speaks of the necessity of the salvation of souls through repentance I can only listen to the Deposit of Faith as defended by previous Popes, for the sake of the salvation my own soul and those for whom I pray for.
You: During this pontificate, there nothing that leads to the salvation of souls...
Pope Leo XIII: ...the strong and effective instrument of salvation is none other than the Roman Pontificate.
What you have written makes so much sense to me! I’m tired of a pontificate which is constantly trying to find new “interpretations” of the message of the Gospel! As you have said, what we need to do is “repent and believe the Good News.” Period! Perhaps sadly, I have stopped listening to this pope and turn to the Catechism for answers and inspiration.
@@tskjr1 The CCC contains some of those Pick one prior to Vatican II.
This is a good short analysis to share with Canadian Synod representatives since we hear little to no Synod skepticism tolerated from parish levels up. Thank you and your guest.
Every body, whether an ecclesial or figurative needs a singular head where the final authority lies. Not a collegial or collective head whereby no decision can be possibly made
Why did I return to the Church? Why do I remain a Catholic? Does Orthodoxy beckon? And the "sin of abuse" is personally a slap in the face.
Vatican Ii ushered in a new religion and took over the offices and the real estate, but Catholicism is still here.
I became Orthodox this year - from the RCC - so much holiness. ☦☦☦☦☦☦☦
@@marcokite The myriad of eastern sects are heading in the same direction as the conciliar religion.
New way of being church = not being the church in my mind, and odd form of Anglicanism where allegedly the teachings don't change but the practice changes. So, the teachings become the equivalent of a "living" and evolving thing, like the left likes to do to the constitution.
What is so weird is that they do everything but actually proclaim Christ in any full-throated way; in fact taking the recent papal statements to youths or in a better world yutes, it seems quite apparent that the literal meaning of the pope is that he is a universalist.
I do not think the pope is honest about his goals. However, he is honest in the optics, the appointments, and the results. For example, not blessing "couples" but photo-ops showing ""couples" getting a blessing, saying such things should be spontaneous when they are clearly arranged for PR purposes in the NY Times. Signing an accord wherein many religions are willed by God, later kind of clarified but then that gets tossed under the bus in the youth meeting and he again doubles down on it later, and zero clarifications, as an "in your eye" kind of treatment.
His behavior adds weight to the sometimes proffered cabal for his election as does his kowtowing to Germany and his removal of a certain bishop who basically presented some legitimate criticism. Is there no compunction for Africa, or for millions of other Catholics who find Peter eating exclusively at the Jesuit table? Are some of us just not circumcised the right way for him?
It is so odd to have to live through such a time where of all people I feel most estranged from the pope who is the holy father. I think he may be a mental case, somehow deranged, but are not those things the emblem of most Jesuits? Where in all this is the fervor for conversion of the world to the one holy catholic and apostolic faith? Where is the proclamation and leadership and clarity of teaching so desperately needed? It is the tip of an iceberg with this guy and he has not been good for the church in my estimation, the church is not some liberal Jesuit college.
These are my mere opinions and I can be wrong, but I am entitled to form them and say them.
The first people I heard using that odd phrase "being church" were nuns in pantsuits. I have been suspicious of it ever since.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and Peace.
Pope Francis was legally chosen and accepted widely, but seems to be missing the Grace of this Office, and I've heard a good argument that since VII is filled with statements that go against the Apostolic teaching that has been solid since Christ established Her and against so many solid Magisterial long teaching that it should be removed and that Pope Francis (at least) seems to have been set to change the Church, against his office's Holy Duties, and create a new Modernist Church, against all the [implied] Oaths - intended from before and at Acceptance of his Office that God could not pour into him the Graces of Pope.
Something to Consider.
Pray for his Repentance and removal of VII, and Justly receiving the Office and those Graces.
God Bless., Steve
How utterly ridiculous. The removal of Vatican II! The largest Church gathering ever attended by 2500 Bishops, all the documents passed unanimously. You have no clue what you are talking about if u think Vatican II needs removing.
Sorry, but you have been convinced by the nutty rad trads - you say many things that are totally untrue. You say "VII is filled with statements that go against the Apostolic teaching" - but that is totally false. Beware - many rad trads are not Catholic at all - they are more like Martin Luther than Martin Luther was.
This sounds accurate and echoes the Thesis of Bishop Guerard des Lauriers.
VCII did contradict previous Catholic teaching.
PF is looking 2 change the the lines on the field for both Clergy and Laity .....
De Ranking is the goal .....
Jacobs, ladder is no longer required.....
Enough with the poised, calm, takes. This man is an antipope prophesied in 2 Thessalonians. Nothing about him is Catholic, much less holy.
The once great Church of Rome, now an embarrassing and dangerous wokey clownshow. Who could ever have imagined it would devolve into this?
Nobody knows…because this pontificate doesn’t declare doctrine with clarity 15:31
Since when can a pope invent new sins? The stupid list of synodality sins denigrates the seriousness of real sins which will lead us to hell. This list mocks God's teachings .
The purpiose of synodality is Mission.
and what is that mission? "listening to everyone who is not an orthodox Catholic?"
It’s just a forum for liberal Catholics
Both of you are terrible speakers on this podcast because you interrupt yourselves.
Henricks seems opposed to a open, inclusive Church.
All the open inclusive churches I know of are bleeding members, especially men, like mad. And young people are not interested. It is not a winning formula, clearly.
“seems” is a very speculative word in this comment
The Sensus Fidei is clearly set out by the ITC in 2014. Your inuendo about how this is being, in some way, changed baffles me. A new way of being Church implies listening, without neccesarily agreeing. Name me one element of doctrine that has been changed under this pontiicate, you can't because it hasnt.