Why prakrti which is composed of 3 guna counted as 1 thing ? Also, in Aristotle, among 10 categories one of which is substance like individual man or individual stone etc, and then there is another category which is Quality. Quality is in the substance. Like substance honey possess the quality of sweetness. How would Sāmkhya consider Quality and Substance ? Many affective qualities seem to be like combinations of Gunas. At the same time Gunas give rise to perceived substance
Why prakrti which is composed of 3 guna counted as 1 thing ? Also, in Aristotle, among 10 categories one of which is substance like individual man or individual stone etc, and then there is another category which is Quality. Quality is in the substance. Like substance honey possess the quality of sweetness. How would Sāmkhya consider Quality and Substance ? Many affective qualities seem to be like combinations of Gunas. At the same time Gunas give rise to perceived substance
Why prakrti which is composed of 3 guna counted as 1 thing ?
Also, in Aristotle, among 10 categories one of which is substance like individual man or individual stone etc, and then there is another category which is Quality. Quality is in the substance. Like substance honey possess the quality of sweetness.
How would Sāmkhya consider Quality and Substance ?
Many affective qualities seem to be like combinations of Gunas.
At the same time Gunas give rise to perceived substance
Indra is non controversial. Even buddhists and jains don't deny his existence
Why prakrti which is composed of 3 guna counted as 1 thing ?
Also, in Aristotle, among 10 categories one of which is substance like individual man or individual stone etc, and then there is another category which is Quality. Quality is in the substance. Like substance honey possess the quality of sweetness.
How would Sāmkhya consider Quality and Substance ?
Many affective qualities seem to be like combinations of Gunas.
At the same time Gunas give rise to perceived substance