1:22 - The Story of King Lear 14:18 - King Lear Character Analysis 26:01 - The Fool Character Analysis 32:05 - Cordelia Character Analysis 36:39 - Edmund Character Analysis 42:14 - Themes of King Lear
The fact that the only people who seem to read Shakespeare anymore are college students who are doing so out of coercion rather than enjoyment speaks volumes about our current state of affairs. Shakespeare found me in the hole in prison when I was 19 and I was immediately enthralled that anyone could write with such eloquence and a comprehensive understanding of human nature in all its decadent depravity. 15 years after reading his plays for the first time I'm still coming back trying to unravel the sheer complexity of these stories that took me years to even somewhat grasp because I'm kind of a moron. And still I'm discovering things that I hadn't noticed before, because these plays really are that profound. I appreciate everyone who continues to keep these works alive, I just wish more people knew how fortunate we are to have this kind of stuff available to us. We would be all the poorer without it.
I love Macbeth and have stumbled on King Lear. The fact that back in Shakespeare’s say, the play’s emphasis is on audio and less on the acting as not everyone could see the stage makes Shakespeare’s writing even more compelling.
42:30 "King Lear" is a supremely logical play. It makes perfect sense. It is not really about either Justice or Karma. More it is about actions and consequences. Delusions versus power realities. The ending is both just and unjust. The actions of the characters play out logically, it is a REALISTIC play, philosophically.
Lear always felt Sophoclean to me: kings, blindness, daughters, will of the gods and all that. Highly recommend Kurosawa's Ran (1985) as alternative to the typical Lear play. For that matter, I've always liked Throne of Blood as the go-to Macbeth performance. Thanks for the video!
The Nihilism (in this play and others) is not intended to teach us that 'life is meaningless, so nothing matters' but rather 'life is meaningless, so everything matters'.
Have a final exam on king Lear and have been looking for something to listen to while I do regular tasks so I can revise while doing other things. This helped so much xx
Thank you very much for this concise and thoughtful reflection. One recurring theme is perhaps that people have to hit rock bottom before their eyes open up to the world.
Yeah people are very shallow and cold. They are very bourgeois and pretentious in their approach to any real social justice issues. They pretend to be charitable but it’s a display to appear to be good when they are not good at all. They are vicious murderers in truth. So I left them all behind because I don’t associate with those who have no integrity. Bourgeois provinciality that is not virtue. They don’t care. They dwell in death. I can’t believe they’re so superficial… Jesus is Lord ✝️🕯🕊💜🙏🕯✝️💜
Lear's main flaw, which is the cause of the main plot, is his VANITY. His vanity is not just that he has come to believe his 'Yes men', but that he believes his personal authority and charisma will out live the practical sources of his power. He thus renders himself powerless and experiences the entirely logical consequences of this. To me the main theme of the play is the "Vanity of power", and that those who wield power should not believe their own propaganda or disaster can result. In this case civil war and invasion. Look not to Greek tragedy to understand Lear but to Machiavelli.
Thanks for explaining this convoluted plot line. Romeo Juliet is much better because its pretty straightforward. Some of Shakespeares plays are more like 4 season TV shows
@@lost524 Exactly, but the story does follow a simple enough path, it is just that it so easy to dismiss Lear himself as an egocentric old fool who goes mad.
This is a play of true coincidence. Not how we use the word(random event with no discernable reason) but in that it is a series of events unfolding as a result of what came before. Leer brought his fate on himself with his arrogance and hubris. He gave his daughters everything in hopes not of making them better, but in the hopes they'd love him more. This turns them selfish and greedy, so much so that they shun their father (albeit for some legitimate reasons) and plot against each other. The old, blind man who's name escapes me loses his eyes after being too blind in sight to see the treachery right in front of his face. Cordelia's death is the most unjust seeming if you look through the eyes of point A to B karma, but even the Bible tells stories of seemingly unjust events being just in the grand scale. Leer himself killed her in his vanity, and her character echos the sacrifice of Christ who died for his love and passion. in a way, had she survived Leer may have lived a bit longer, but probably wouldn't have taken the lesson so seriously. Cordelia would have also had to live with the memory of tragedy much longer than her father would have which would leave deeps scars on one as kind and noble as she was. The fools death was likewise seemingly meaningless, but if taken from the perspective of narrative, it probably represents the fact Leer no longer needed his external voice of reason after he found peace. In the end, it's up to us to form our own meaning from tragedy because "The Gods'" plans encompass more than we could ever know.
The ‘old blind man’ is Gloucester, father of Edgar and Edmund. His eyes were gouged out by orders from Goneril, and he was assisted by Poor Tom, otherwise known as Edgar, to ‘Dover’ where he was planning to jump off the cliff. It would be evident that this would not be the case though. Well said.
I'm a 74 year old Shakespeare lover. So, tell me.... if you're presenting a detailed. educated analysis of Lear, why would you include foul language in your presentation? Are you aiming at a younger audiance or is it an example of the 'dumbing-down' of society that inevitably leads to the eschewng of literary geniouses like Shakespeare, Dickens and the like because it calls for the use of a brain?
🙈 Think I've just had a fan girl moment 😂 generally I just listen to videos. I immediately reconize "this voice" its as recognisable as sir David Attenborough's and just as melodically soothing while it educates me.. Lol I realised indeed it is you, and I'm so glad I found this chanel too! 🤷♀️ Why I've never checked b4 now idk!
So I have never read or seen this play, but just realized I have to give a class on it tomorrow, so thank you for saving my ass haha On your last point: I always think of nihilism as the launchpad for existentialism in the sorta Camus sense, and I think through that lense the Game Of Thrones levels of meaningless death make more sense. Life and death really are meaningless and arbitrary, so all you can do is create meaning for your own sake while you can, as Lear's ark from Trump to loving father shows.
It's really just the equivalent of an old timey soap opera. A lot of soapy drama but little more to say beyond that. And arguably it even isnt successful at that. I imagine at least 90% of the viewers are just watching for schoolwork and rather than have any real appreciation for the story are looking for a shortcut to avoid having to read/watch it.
There is no way William Shakspar wrote this play or any of the others attributed to him. The belief that he did is nothing more than an absurd fantasy that is maintained today because there are so many financial interests that benefit from it.
@@Tolstoy111 That is the exact opposite of reality. There's actually no evidence at all that Shakspar wrote a single line of a play or a sonnet. He couldn't even write his own name and left not one single letter or manuscript, nor did he own a single book. Look up how many letters Tolstoy left or how many books he owned.
1:22 - The Story of King Lear
14:18 - King Lear Character Analysis
26:01 - The Fool Character Analysis
32:05 - Cordelia Character Analysis
36:39 - Edmund Character Analysis
42:14 - Themes of King Lear
The fact that the only people who seem to read Shakespeare anymore are college students who are doing so out of coercion rather than enjoyment speaks volumes about our current state of affairs. Shakespeare found me in the hole in prison when I was 19 and I was immediately enthralled that anyone could write with such eloquence and a comprehensive understanding of human nature in all its decadent depravity. 15 years after reading his plays for the first time I'm still coming back trying to unravel the sheer complexity of these stories that took me years to even somewhat grasp because I'm kind of a moron. And still I'm discovering things that I hadn't noticed before, because these plays really are that profound. I appreciate everyone who continues to keep these works alive, I just wish more people knew how fortunate we are to have this kind of stuff available to us. We would be all the poorer without it.
I love Macbeth and have stumbled on King Lear. The fact that back in Shakespeare’s say, the play’s emphasis is on audio and less on the acting as not everyone could see the stage makes Shakespeare’s writing even more compelling.
I have a literature exam tomorrow, i love the way you break the characters and themes down!
Same! Good luck!
42:30 "King Lear" is a supremely logical play. It makes perfect sense. It is not really about either Justice or Karma. More it is about actions and consequences. Delusions versus power realities. The ending is both just and unjust. The actions of the characters play out logically, it is a REALISTIC play, philosophically.
Lear always felt Sophoclean to me: kings, blindness, daughters, will of the gods and all that. Highly recommend Kurosawa's Ran (1985) as alternative to the typical Lear play. For that matter, I've always liked Throne of Blood as the go-to Macbeth performance. Thanks for the video!
Thank you for making the world more cultured and educated.
Thank you for watching :)
The Nihilism (in this play and others) is not intended to teach us that 'life is meaningless, so nothing matters' but rather 'life is meaningless, so everything matters'.
Have a final exam on king Lear and have been looking for something to listen to while I do regular tasks so I can revise while doing other things. This helped so much xx
I have an English exam tomorrow so this is brilliant, thanks so much!!! I love the way everything is phrased.
"A bit of a dick." Hmmm. If only I had thought to write **that** down on my AP English essay exam re Lear back in 1983. 👼 Cheers!
Such an underrated channel wow cant believe I found a gem by accident
Thank you very much for this concise and thoughtful reflection. One recurring theme is perhaps that people have to hit rock bottom before their eyes open up to the world.
Yeah people are very shallow and cold. They are very bourgeois and pretentious in their approach to any real social justice issues. They pretend to be charitable but it’s a display to appear to be good when they are not good at all. They are vicious murderers in truth. So I left them all behind because I don’t associate with those who have no integrity. Bourgeois provinciality that is not virtue. They don’t care. They dwell in death. I can’t believe they’re so superficial…
Jesus is Lord ✝️🕯🕊💜🙏🕯✝️💜
Love your legends of history channel didn't know you had another one made my day 💖💖
Lear's main flaw, which is the cause of the main plot, is his VANITY. His vanity is not just that he has come to believe his 'Yes men', but that he believes his personal authority and charisma will out live the practical sources of his power. He thus renders himself powerless and experiences the entirely logical consequences of this. To me the main theme of the play is the "Vanity of power", and that those who wield power should not believe their own propaganda or disaster can result. In this case civil war and invasion. Look not to Greek tragedy to understand Lear but to Machiavelli.
Thanks for explaining this convoluted plot line. Romeo Juliet is much better because its pretty straightforward.
Some of Shakespeares plays are more like 4 season TV shows
A fair description of the synopsis, however, the given character analysis of Lear is here much oversimplified.
Can you explain why?
the whole thing is some surface level analysis
@@lost524 Exactly, but the story does follow a simple enough path, it is just that it so easy to dismiss Lear himself as an egocentric old fool who goes mad.
I truly enjoyed this
The Japanese movie Ran (Turmoil) is based on Shakespeare's King Lear.
Kurosawa!
Your channel is a gift. Thank you for your amazing job:)
Very helpful for my exam revision, thanks.
I believe you should also listen to Ian Mc Kellen’s view on Lear the persona and transition. Great video tough.
Just read, and more importantly, watch, and most importantly, act King Lear. Don’t replace the art for an analysis and executive summary.
Well spoken
And this isn't even a good summary.
This is a play of true coincidence. Not how we use the word(random event with no discernable reason) but in that it is a series of events unfolding as a result of what came before.
Leer brought his fate on himself with his arrogance and hubris. He gave his daughters everything in hopes not of making them better, but in the hopes they'd love him more. This turns them selfish and greedy, so much so that they shun their father (albeit for some legitimate reasons) and plot against each other.
The old, blind man who's name escapes me loses his eyes after being too blind in sight to see the treachery right in front of his face. Cordelia's death is the most unjust seeming if you look through the eyes of point A to B karma, but even the Bible tells stories of seemingly unjust events being just in the grand scale. Leer himself killed her in his vanity, and her character echos the sacrifice of Christ who died for his love and passion. in a way, had she survived Leer may have lived a bit longer, but probably wouldn't have taken the lesson so seriously. Cordelia would have also had to live with the memory of tragedy much longer than her father would have which would leave deeps scars on one as kind and noble as she was.
The fools death was likewise seemingly meaningless, but if taken from the perspective of narrative, it probably represents the fact Leer no longer needed his external voice of reason after he found peace.
In the end, it's up to us to form our own meaning from tragedy because "The Gods'" plans encompass more than we could ever know.
Wonderfully said
The ‘old blind man’ is Gloucester, father of Edgar and Edmund. His eyes were gouged out by orders from Goneril, and he was assisted by Poor Tom, otherwise known as Edgar, to ‘Dover’ where he was planning to jump off the cliff. It would be evident that this would not be the case though. Well said.
Written by Shakespeare the year 605!!!!
Thank you legend of history for video
NOT AT ALL RANDOM! ENTIRELY LOGICAL - actions have consequences.
Shak was truly a genius
The new DLC campaign for AOEII: King Lear
thank u so much for this
Brilliant ❤
Was King Lear based upon a tale of an ancient Irish High King. Before written histories?
Thank you. Thanks alot.
I'm a 74 year old Shakespeare lover. So, tell me.... if you're presenting a detailed. educated analysis of Lear, why would you include foul language in your presentation? Are you aiming at a younger audiance or is it an example of the 'dumbing-down' of society that inevitably leads to the eschewng of literary geniouses like Shakespeare, Dickens and the like because it calls for the use of a brain?
Good job
Man its been a while
You sound so much like Thomas Brodie Sangster
🙈 Think I've just had a fan girl moment 😂 generally I just listen to videos. I immediately reconize "this voice" its as recognisable as sir David Attenborough's and just as melodically soothing while it educates me.. Lol I realised indeed it is you, and I'm so glad I found this chanel too! 🤷♀️ Why I've never checked b4 now idk!
51:39 best part 😂 come at me.
Check out Gerald Cantor re the opening. You've got it wrong.
So I have never read or seen this play, but just realized I have to give a class on it tomorrow, so thank you for saving my ass haha
On your last point: I always think of nihilism as the launchpad for existentialism in the sorta Camus sense, and I think through that lense the Game Of Thrones levels of meaningless death make more sense. Life and death really are meaningless and arbitrary, so all you can do is create meaning for your own sake while you can, as Lear's ark from Trump to loving father shows.
please make a video for twelfth night as well :))
Dead bodies sells tickets.
Can you do analysis for Romeo and Juliet
I'm half way through recording it ;)
@@TimesTalesTreasures awesome
@The Gray Ghost so true
42:40 The world was and IS a terrible place. Worse things happen in Africa everyday but are not heard about.
This isn't very analytical at all and aa for themes, hello.... what about parenting? What about flouting the will of God by abdicating?
Great point.
What does "aa" mean, though? 🤔
Nice production, but this is an utterly terrible take on King Lear. Hubris? That’s what you got out of this?
So agree.
It's really just the equivalent of an old timey soap opera. A lot of soapy drama but little more to say beyond that. And arguably it even isnt successful at that. I imagine at least 90% of the viewers are just watching for schoolwork and rather than have any real appreciation for the story are looking for a shortcut to avoid having to read/watch it.
It’s sad that you believe this play has little to say. Ironic comment to make on a play about blindness.
Oof, the comment of a fool right there.
Shakespeare's "not that good at writing"?? Then you want money? lol.
Rage bait at its finest
@@heatherwoods5703 Lacking any rage, it seems that analysis is also inadequate.
There is no way William Shakspar wrote this play or any of the others attributed to him. The belief that he did is nothing more than an absurd fantasy that is maintained today because there are so many financial interests that benefit from it.
There is no evidence for anyone else.
@@Tolstoy111 That is the exact opposite of reality. There's actually no evidence at all that Shakspar wrote a single line of a play or a sonnet. He couldn't even write his own name and left not one single letter or manuscript, nor did he own a single book. Look up how many letters Tolstoy left or how many books he owned.
🙄
@@LalaBee4now A very convincing response! 👍👏😅
@@rafthejaf8789it doesn't matter who wrote it. It's meant to be enjoyed. The rest isn't important.