Oberheim OB-X vs. OB-Xa Vintage Analog Synthesizer sound battle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
  • (c) 2015 vintage synthesizer demo by RetroSound
    supported by UVI: bit.ly/retrosound-uvi
    Oberheim OB-X (1979) 8-voice vs. Oberheim OB-Xa (1981) 8-voice Analog Synthesizer with identical self-programmed sound programs.
    This video shows the different sound character. The OB-X is discrete analog like the SEM modul and sounds very raw and wild.
    The OB-Xa based on Curtis CEM ICs and sounds more smooth.
    Both are great synths and I love both a lot. The king class of polyphonic analog synthesizers.
    This is the sound.
    no compression, no EQ, only a bit delay used.
    more info and pics:
    Here can you find the full OB-Xa playlist with a lot single sound demos, synth comparisions and one synth demo tracks. Enjoy.
    The OB-Xa playlist -- • Oberheim OB-Xa Synthes...
    Facebook page: / 265713782347
    0:00 Einleitung
    0:10 OB-X - soft pulse pad
    1:04 OB-Xa - soft pulse pad
    1:53 OB-X - sawtooth brass sound
    2:23 OB-Xa - sawtooth brass sound
    3:27 OB-Xa - filter sweep 12dB/O
    3:57 OB-X-pulse width modulation
    4:32 OB-Xa - pulse width modulation
    4:55 OB-X - sample/hold.-- filter
    5:29 'Oberheim
    5:55 OB-X - Osc-Sync + Unisono
    7:06 OB-X-filter reso bass
    7:37 OB-Xa - filter reso bass
    #Oberheim #obxa #obx #obx8 #ubxa
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 257

  • @retrosound72
    @retrosound72  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Oberheim OB-XA Synthesizer is one of the big legendary synths in music history. Used by many pop and rock groups in the 80s. Most famous is Jump by Van Halen. Here can you find the full OB-Xa playlist with a lot single sound demos, synth comparisions and one synth demo tracks. Enjoy.
    The OB-Xa playlist ----> th-cam.com/play/PLe08Lbpy8pPYApz7OEsMe5SnyNaLUw-f1.html

    • @lukalayne4629
      @lukalayne4629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Emmitt Keaton Glad I could help :D

    • @Pintosonic
      @Pintosonic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From what I’ve read in an interview with Eddie Van Halen, the studio recording of Jump was done with an OB-X but OB-Xa were used live an in the videoclip.

  • @geoffk777
    @geoffk777 8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Thanks! I was surprised by how different they are. The OB-Xa is much smoother and more refined, but the OB-X is far nastier, grittier and more powerful and immediate. In the sync segment, the OB-Xa sounds good, but the OB-X just screams, in a way that very few instruments can.
    If I had to choose one, it would definitely be the OB-X.

  • @ebondefender
    @ebondefender 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I now understand Prince's love for this synth. :)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +ebondefender ;)

    • @kamelhamlaoui9983
      @kamelhamlaoui9983 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually it was his favourite. Prince was “ the best using The Oberheim “!!!!💕☔️☔️☔️☔️

  • @yahirthevyond
    @yahirthevyond 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Both look great but I like the OB-X more because it sounds warm and lush. One day, if I have the money, I’ll buy one.

  • @MrVadymMykh
    @MrVadymMykh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    No VST can emulate that energy!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +Vadym Mykhaylyuk agree with you!
      it needs electricity to flow.

    • @droidbotdotcom
      @droidbotdotcom 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Vadym Mykhaylyuk Off course...NEVER!! ; ) :P

    • @ZElTGElST
      @ZElTGElST 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The VST sounds great as a VST... but it have nothing to do vs the real analogic monsters

  • @muco007
    @muco007 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I can never get enough of the Oberheim brass sounds. Big and beautiful!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +muco007 :)

    • @rednax3333
      @rednax3333 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I couldn’t agree more! I feel second-hand embarrassment for other synths that even try to do brass! 😆

  • @user-oc1pi9xn1o
    @user-oc1pi9xn1o 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Both terrific classics, but...OB-X hands down. Depth & girth are simply unreal - almost like a perfectly-calibrated 8-Voice. There is something to be said about the merits of its almost fully discrete topology.

    • @supadupahilton6848
      @supadupahilton6848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, God bless TTL Logic, Eh?

    • @user-oc1pi9xn1o
      @user-oc1pi9xn1o 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@supadupahilton6848 James L. Buie must be smiling in heavens about this

  • @babyblushoal
    @babyblushoal 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    That OSC Sync demo at around 5:51 is how Geddy (Rush) did Witch Hunt (beginning). You can really hear it at around 6:23. I mean it's not exact, but the technique is there. Hearing the sweeping sync'd pitches and filter is freakin' amazing - guttural, organic and truly visceral. Seriously, it made my insides twist

    • @dnashofficial
      @dnashofficial 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      reminds me of Turbo Love from Judas Priest as well ;-) Ged did love his oberheims, lol.

    • @dez1989
      @dez1989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think any Rush fan is a fan of Oberheim synths, especially the OB-X and the OB-XA! Rush is synonymous with Moog and the Minimoog, Moog Taurus pedals, OB-X and OB-XA's. I can't forget the Oberheim Modular! Oh yea, and Rickenbacker 4001's and the 4080-6 and the 4080-12 double neck bass and electric guitar. And yes, a little Jazz bass back in the same time period.

    • @PetersPianoShoppe
      @PetersPianoShoppe ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The night is black, without a moon....

  • @jamesmeeker6933
    @jamesmeeker6933 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    A few things to keep in mind before writing off the Xa: the filter options (2 pole/4 pole) and the ability to do splits and layers are incredible additions over the X. To truly understand the power of the Xa you have to get an 8 voice model and design some layered patches. HUGE!

  • @80deniers
    @80deniers 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    According to me, after listening several times certain passages on the video, so the pads and bass, the OB-X sounds more warm and deep than the OB-Xa.

  • @LiquidAudio
    @LiquidAudio 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Oh boy, you totally had me with that OB-X opening minute, just epic! LOVE that OB-X.

  • @TheFokker03
    @TheFokker03 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    these things are sheer masterpieces,sod Moogs,i'd have one of these any day.

  • @analogsynthaficionado1406
    @analogsynthaficionado1406 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The OB-X is my preference of these two but you really can't go wrong owning either one. Better yet, buy both!

  • @analogsynthplayer
    @analogsynthplayer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Both please, Great video, thank you Mr. Tom Oberheim

  • @MrBatraaf
    @MrBatraaf 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Absolutely one of my favourite synths. So organic that it almost sounds alive.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +MrBatraaf agree with you.
      a class of its own. :)

  • @venusiansky
    @venusiansky 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Oberheim fan here. Would love to own an OB-X. I have the OB-8 and I love it. It sort of gets misrepresented since it is the most "clean" of the three, but don't be deceived, it is an analog monster compared to many other analog polys. Of the three, it has a wider set of tools for sound design. OB-8 added Triangle wave and Saw+Pulse mixed wave. Also a dynamic arpeggiator and page two modulation controls.

    • @kamelhamlaoui9983
      @kamelhamlaoui9983 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had all of them + OG SEM and LM-1. Sold everything 4 peanuts 🥜 21 years ago.,started all over : OBX-8 SEM’s pro + patch panel, mpc60 mk2.🙏😎

  • @DavidBoura
    @DavidBoura 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I remember, i was searching everything about synths, and most of the infos were text and photos. Frustrating.
    So i hopelessly searched on youtube a very hypotetical channel that would showcase all synths, even compare them.
    "Retrosound" pop'd out. If i remember well, i spent the next 24 hours in Heaven, with neurons like popcorns.
    Sincerely yours Marko!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +David Boura awww thank you so much David! :)
      This is why I created this channel in 2006.
      You understand the message.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +DinoRocker 86 ;)

  • @onathanj
    @onathanj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The two greatest synths ever produced. Sound wise, that is.

  • @stevehofer3482
    @stevehofer3482 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for doing this demo. I was surprised there wasn't a bigger difference, honestly, since the two synths have completely different electronics. I was listening on computer speakers, but still, I think they sounded more alike than different.

  • @timbuk1126
    @timbuk1126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They both sound excellent!

  • @synthscolors
    @synthscolors 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2 Analog Monsters !
    Really Complementary Oberheim Synth !
    Thanks For This Sound Delight... Moment !
    Keep Performing & Sharing These ! ;- ) )

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +synths colors thank you! :))

  • @kidgloves2
    @kidgloves2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this comparison. You're the only person to do it

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thank you :)

    • @MisAnnThorpe
      @MisAnnThorpe 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe he's the only person who can afford to do it!

  • @retrosound72
    @retrosound72  3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Oberheim OB-X Synthesizer from 1978 is one of the legendary synths in music history. Used by Ultravox, Japan, Killing Joke, J.-M. Jarre, Rush, Barcley James Harvest and others. Here can you find the full OB-X playlist with a lot single sound demos, synth comparisions and one synth demo tracks. Enjoy.
    The OB-X playlist ----> th-cam.com/play/PLe08Lbpy8pPbR3dUZoZjD7AV-J36-EOB5.html

  • @Pianosphere
    @Pianosphere 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Sound as always!

  • @edmundworrell1864
    @edmundworrell1864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These are both wonderful sounding

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolut agree with you.

  • @sprintbass
    @sprintbass 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I have an oberheim emblem tattoo. Proud of it.

    • @rg2027x
      @rg2027x 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i have a shirt that says Oberheim on it

    • @AdamBorseti
      @AdamBorseti 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I've got an OB-X shirt. We should all form a club with a tree house and everything!

    • @devicefactor2290
      @devicefactor2290 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      sprintbass just bought an obxa from Patrick Leonard, keyboardist of Madonna

    • @jpnoll1781
      @jpnoll1781 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      lets have secret passwords too and decoder rings!

    • @Shred_The_Weapon
      @Shred_The_Weapon 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      What did you pay for the Patrick Leonard OB?

  • @MrFricoco
    @MrFricoco 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    beautiful sounds!

  • @kixxalot
    @kixxalot 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome beasts! The difference is not as big as I had imagined. They both have a massive presence.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +kixxalot it`s the sound programming. the OB-X has a lot more power.

    • @kixxalot
      @kixxalot 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You mean you programmed them to sound similar in this video?
      I would love to get my hands on an OB-X one day, but I already know I'm not ready for the maintenance. Anyway thanks for sharing the sounds, I really enjoy your videos.

  • @einezcrespo
    @einezcrespo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love these two Oberheim synths!

  • @gunjabeans
    @gunjabeans 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For the most part I like the refined sound of the OB-Xa but in the Osc-Sync + Unisono demo the OB-X about ripped my face off!

  • @AdamBorseti
    @AdamBorseti 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Wow! I knew there was a big difference, but when played A/B it's HUGE! They both sound great, but the OB-X blows the Xa out of the water in my opinion! It seems as though there is less...... "hiss"...... like, the resonance is a lot smoother and less piercing..... the CEM chips on the Xa really are a bit too sharp on the high resonance end of things...

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Adam Borseti yes agree with you.
      discrete analog vs. CEM

    • @daniellippert7853
      @daniellippert7853 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I actually like both. For warm pads, I'd definitely go for the OB-X, or even a Matrix-12, but for more buzzy electronic sounds, the Xa truly shines!

    • @MrLawrence0071
      @MrLawrence0071 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I prefer the X too.

  • @21GunStudio
    @21GunStudio 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    My vote: buy one of each

    • @theamateurfurry4735
      @theamateurfurry4735 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      21GunStudio I second this motion

    • @Shred_The_Weapon
      @Shred_The_Weapon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Slightly redundant. I would personally pick the Xa for its split/layer function. If I had to have another 8-note analog, I would choose the Prophet T-8.

    • @dumdum7786
      @dumdum7786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who needs money?

    • @hartmutzeller2894
      @hartmutzeller2894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Shred_The_Weapon good choice!

    • @pinkdragon6136
      @pinkdragon6136 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My vote - “i need more money”

  • @rwesreal
    @rwesreal 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have an opportunity to get an obx which needs work...after seeing these sound textures you have created...well it's a no brainier to me!!! What a unbelievable poly synth!!! Thanks for the video comparison!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Real Ryan thanks for the feedback and good luck!

  • @niccage5337
    @niccage5337 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a beautiful sound!

  • @charlesfranklin2112
    @charlesfranklin2112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    They both sound incredible, perhaps the Taurus 1 could complete this tri-fecta.

  • @claudioricci431
    @claudioricci431 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They both sound extremely good, but the ob-xa is simply astonishing (superior filter resonance timbre and smoother sound).

  • @Shred_The_Weapon
    @Shred_The_Weapon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I keep thinking that I would like one of these, but the one that I keep pining for is the OB8, especially one upgraded with MIDI. And in recent years, I pine for an Xpander module.
    I also imagine getting both.

  • @MrFeveR-tn5dn
    @MrFeveR-tn5dn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very much alike. Both sound great.

  • @jimghivizzani5883
    @jimghivizzani5883 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice demo!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jim Ghivizzani thank you!

  • @gagealbright
    @gagealbright 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u for doing this!

  • @ReginatorNet
    @ReginatorNet 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm building an 8 voice OB-X clone and hoping it'll sound close to that - thanks for posting this!

  • @75-020
    @75-020 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing VS !!

  • @twelvewingproductions7508
    @twelvewingproductions7508 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man.. I miss that synth. Sold it many years ago and probably shouldn't have.

  • @synthartist69
    @synthartist69 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful!!!!

  • @vaportrails7943
    @vaportrails7943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Having an OB-6 and listening to this, it is really clear that it’s more like an OB-X than an OB-Xa, despite the blue stripes. It’s that discrete circuitry and SEM state variable filter. The Curtis chips are much more aggressive/harsh, less smooth and rounded. More high frequencies. The oscillators by themselves sound very different. I do envy the 12/24 switch and split/layer, though.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      agree technical more like a X. But not soundwise. The OB-6 is a good synth. But not comparable with the old OB series. all is matter of taste.

  • @LifeofCharlie19
    @LifeofCharlie19 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bugger - the OBX pulse with modulation is awesome. Oh, ditto for OBX-a. It's really difficult to compare two monsters like these. LIstening to the sound while reading the comments section and then going back quickly to the video to see which one the guy is playing when it sounds the best is one way.

  • @100DollarHeadache
    @100DollarHeadache 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great demonstration of the difference between discrete and chip-based. I finally understand why OB-X goes for twice the price of Xa or 8 - much more lush and full. That said, the Xa / 8 are the best sounding Curtis-based synths, and the cut and clarity really work to their advantage on leads (especially with sync).
    The OB-X and Xa can actually share patches via cassette interface. X-Mod and Half Noise on the X become F-Env and 4 Pole respectively on the Xa. This would have made the comparison perfect.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      OB-X is rarer too I think.

    • @crnogor
      @crnogor ปีที่แล้ว

      Crazy expensive ! Man from EU been asking 20 000 euro , now 17 000 !

  • @subzero9976
    @subzero9976 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer the sound of the OB-X personally. great comparison Marko.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +philip maher thank you! :)

  • @waltercruz2044
    @waltercruz2044 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No Tom Sawyer seep recreation on both?
    Well, awesome video man. Thank you!

  • @resofactor
    @resofactor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some of the finest synths ever made.

  • @mantra3000
    @mantra3000 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Okay that sounds good. I heard awful demos of that thing, but this is pretty powerful and rich and textured and not boring at all to listen to.

  • @drecksheep
    @drecksheep 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool!Ab 4:52 biste Sound mäßig genau in meiner Region.Man wie ich das mag,schönes WE!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +drecksheep Ich weiß doch dass du eine Vorliebe für Filter Gebubber hast. ;)
      Ebenso! :)

  • @valivali2710
    @valivali2710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great machine, great player!

  • @ken952gtr
    @ken952gtr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The sawtooth brass at 2:22 , Nice!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try this - Christopher Cross 1980 live OBX. Perhaps saw strings but brassy too. th-cam.com/video/qJ_ro9srOSA/w-d-xo.html Sublime especially within the sing. Blends wonderfully. Lovelier than real strings IMO in a song.

  • @systemlfo
    @systemlfo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’d love to make an ambient album using mainly the OB-Xa.

  • @Shred_The_Weapon
    @Shred_The_Weapon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some people have been saying the X is the better of the two. I disagree. I can hardly hear any difference in the signal path between the discrete circuitry and the CEM circuitry. They’re equal, and the Xa has the split/layer functionality. Which is why I would choose it or the OB-8 before the OBX.

  • @oberday
    @oberday 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    3:20 perfect Van Halen 1984.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Ryan Day ;) th-cam.com/video/60qaA-cZahY/w-d-xo.html

    • @foreverseethe
      @foreverseethe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      RIP

  • @donlakakwaaijazz5220
    @donlakakwaaijazz5220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own OB-Xa ,and its a serious monster,i sold my OB-8 for Xa in 1982

  • @SlimMixer
    @SlimMixer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    grossartig!! =)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +SlimMixer Oberheimelig ;)
      Danke!

  • @NiamorH
    @NiamorH 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the very first patch :)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +NiamorH more here: th-cam.com/video/uIAuPmTtz14/w-d-xo.html

  • @MelloCello7
    @MelloCello7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Surprisingly I liked filter sweep & Osc- SYnc better on the OB X, something far more fuller about it. but loove the pads as well as everything else on the OB-Xa.
    The sample/hold --> Filter as well as the reso bass was far too different in terms of tone and tempo respectively for me to make an informed opinion about either way,
    they are both incredible synths!

  • @droidbotdotcom
    @droidbotdotcom 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Retrosound & Wc Olo Garb.... the true Audio Professor's! ;P

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Savas ADSR Wave haha ;)

  • @PetersPianoShoppe
    @PetersPianoShoppe ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OH man... that's tough. They're close, but on that first soft pad, for example... the OB-X is just so otherwordly beautiful. It truly has an inimitable X-factor. Having said that, the OB-Xa is the iconic 80's sound, and has a far richer feature set. Best to simply mortgage one's home and buy both of them.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  ปีที่แล้ว

      Both are different but great

  • @vardothefirst
    @vardothefirst 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The first pad is so godly.

  • @babyblushoal
    @babyblushoal 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, on that OSC sync, one is reminded of Judas Preist "Turbo Lover," although that could have been his guitarist using same sync technique.

    • @tonyisyourpal
      @tonyisyourpal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Roland GR700 (guitar controlled JX3P) got quite the airing on that whole album...

  • @fakshen1973
    @fakshen1973 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The OB-Xa sounds better on pads. To me it sounds like it stays in tune a little bittle. However, there's an occasional glitch sound like an envelope or some sort of modulation mistriggering.
    The OB-X sounds better on more monophonic sounds, especially filter sweeps. Maybe that's the detuning working in favor?

  • @vincewizz8534
    @vincewizz8534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 2 first pads are really lush 🙂

  • @richclarke9978
    @richclarke9978 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    HEy.... at 6:57 as the OBXa decays you can hear a little artifact. Mine does this too from time to time... any idea how to fix that?

  • @EJAlmost
    @EJAlmost 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OB-X by far!!!

    • @getulioprates
      @getulioprates 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too. The OPXa can be more reliable, but the X has the soul of the sound.

  • @WillieWonka928D
    @WillieWonka928D 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey retrosound there's a sound tutorial I'd like to see if you could do. The choir sound during the choruses of The Analog Kid by Rush. It was played on an OB-Xa but can't figure out for the life of me how to get that sound, it's a very realistic choir sound for a synth.

    • @eddievhfan1984
      @eddievhfan1984 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +WillieWonka928D Use saw or narrow pulse waves, and detune to where they're thick, but the beating between notes isn't faster than a few cycles per second. Use a static filter (2-pole sounds better for this application than 4-pole), apply a medium amount of resonance, and sweep the filter until you get that "ahh" sound of the filter peak. No modulation required there. Use relatively soft attack and release, full volume sustain.
      Aside from that, a Lexicon-style hall reverb works wonders to set the "voices" in the right place in the mix.

    • @mrduckbutt
      @mrduckbutt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +WillieWonka928D I spent awhile trying to get that same sound on my OB-X. I eventually stumbled on a factory preset (somewhere in the B bank I believe) that was very close, but just had too much modulation. I modified that patch and got pretty much the identical Analog Kid choir sound (even better sounding through space echo). If you're interested I can try to find the patch I wrote down somewhere.

  • @lymansn
    @lymansn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OB-X all the way. I think the Ob-X has more bite. Jump was originally recorded on the OB-x through a Marshall stack. Look at the heat sinks on the Ob-X that thing is a monster of a synth.

  • @Heathcliff_hensel
    @Heathcliff_hensel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video! Hey Retro I'm about to restore an OBX do you have any advice as far as known component failures?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +friendofCHAKA I think this is a work for a whole life. ;)
      when all voicecards are ok it must go. good luck!
      thank you! :)

    • @Heathcliff_hensel
      @Heathcliff_hensel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +RetroSound I was afraid you were going to say that. Haha

    • @DonSolaris
      @DonSolaris 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +friendofCHAKA There you go: www.gearslutz.com/board/electronic-music-instruments-electronic-music-production/766061-oberheim-ob-x-my-story.html
      And another restoration: www.gearslutz.com/board/electronic-music-instruments-electronic-music-production/924733-another-oberheim-ob-x-saved-harm.html

    • @Heathcliff_hensel
      @Heathcliff_hensel 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Don thats great info, There is definitely a lot going on in there. I think I'm going to look for an Oberheim specialist. Do you know of any in America?

  • @cameronhawkins4877
    @cameronhawkins4877 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you add reverb and Delay on some of these??? Because i was under the impression that neither had any FX modules

  • @sounddoctorin
    @sounddoctorin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    much less buzzy edge on the X filters. Sounds smoother on some things. Having an 8 it would be great to find an X. The Xa sounds great on the osc sync though. Fabulous sound quality on that. Hey can I build you a stand that doesn't rock? I have one with a heavy x stand under an aluminum rail thing w/wood ends and copper pipe I built years ago even that my chroma polaris sets on and the multi-trak I had over it for years..now a cs2x and the MT is above and a dx21 with an extention I built on it. That thing is sollllidddd :-).

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      :D I really love these rock`n roll stand. ;)

  • @clammaster4
    @clammaster4 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    man! i wonder who recorded on these. the triangular tones sound great

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simple Minds, The Police, Van Halen, Christopher Cross (OB-X live). Loads of others! ... Try this - Christopher Cross 1980 live OBX. Perhaps sawtooth strings but brassy too. th-cam.com/video/qJ_ro9srOSA/w-d-xo.html Sublime especially within the sing. Blends wonderfully. Lovelier than real strings IMO in a song. Look up Simple Minds Live 2983, Police Gateshead 1982. Both have OB-Xa. Sting places OBXa on Invisible Sun.

  • @MadelnMachines
    @MadelnMachines 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised how close they actually are. Does the Xa low pass open up a lot more than the X on the filter sweeps? Seems like it can expose a lot more high end frequencies. However on the brass patch the opposite seems true. Perhaps it was just your settings?

    • @foreverseethe
      @foreverseethe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      His settings weren't exact, giving the impression that the X is richer. Someone said upthread that they can share patches via cassette tape. He didn't do that for the is video.
      Most gearheads prefer the OB-Xa's sound.

  • @Synthetech
    @Synthetech 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:20 sounds almost exactly like VH's 1984 intro.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Synthetech :) th-cam.com/video/60qaA-cZahY/w-d-xo.html

  • @joe1ysrtu239
    @joe1ysrtu239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it would be interesting to see the scale on oscilloscope!!

  • @860anthony
    @860anthony 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful, beautiful sound. Why did they go? Can't understand it.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +860anthony :)
      real polyphonic analog is too expensive these days

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tom Oberheim was foreclosed on by his bank in 1985.

  • @MrJsfingers
    @MrJsfingers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m spying a Rhodes Chroma in the background ;)

  • @StefanoPapaleo-TS
    @StefanoPapaleo-TS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ah... "Zucker" für die Ohren!;) Ich bin so neidisch lol!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Stefano Papaleo
      ear candy. :)
      Wenn du wüßtest wie pflegeintensiv die alten Schätzchen sind, dann wärst du nicht mehr neidisch. ;)

    • @StefanoPapaleo-TS
      @StefanoPapaleo-TS 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RetroSound ja, ich weiss... aber trotzdem ;) Schönes Wochenende!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Stefano Papaleo Danke ebenso! :)

  • @blogasys
    @blogasys 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Da wackelt sogar der Keyboardständer. :) Ich nehme übrigens 1x beide. ;-)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +peter m. mahr haha ja das ist Rock`n Roll ;)
      Bei dem enormen Gewicht ächst echt der Ständer :D

  • @SPAZZOID100
    @SPAZZOID100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Obx is more discrete, and therefore more HUGE.

  • @darkvaper2010
    @darkvaper2010 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dude where do you get this keybroards there awesome.

  • @AnalogAudio1
    @AnalogAudio1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    schöne Sounds! Gleich zwei große Oberheims, aber kein Prophet-5 oder Jupiter-8 in deinem Fuhrpark? ;-)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +AnalogAudio1 Nee bin eher der Oberheimelige Typ ;)

  • @xnonsuchx
    @xnonsuchx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    OB-X sounds a little warmer, but the OB-Xa sounds more expressive. Is that just a filter thing? Like maybe the filter just needs to be turned down a bit on the OB-Xa to sound more like the OB-X?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +xnonsuchx this discrete analog vs. curtis chip analog.
      the X sounds more agressiv and raw and the Xa more smooth.

  • @1.SkiAggu_FanClub
    @1.SkiAggu_FanClub 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mit welchem Oberheim wurde die Hautpmelodie von NENA's "Nur Geträumt" gespielt ? War es wirklich der Oberheim OB-X ? Ich quäle mich Tag und Nacht mit dieser Frage :O

  • @b.h.gargantua301
    @b.h.gargantua301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So different - so similar.

  • @rg2027x
    @rg2027x 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1984 sweep @ 3:20

  • @tonato17
    @tonato17 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question is, what do you think about the OB6 from DSI? I am tempted to buy it, but there's other part of me that is telling me to wait and get a 2nd hand OBXa. What do you reckon? Thanks!!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      when you want the OB-Xa sound than buy an Xa. when you want a good modern analog synth than buy the OB-6

    • @tonato17
      @tonato17 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That means that the OB6 won't be able to reproduce a very similar sound than the OBXa or the OB8? I am loving the big warm sound of the Xa, sounds so alive

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      than grab a OB-Xa

    • @tonato17
      @tonato17 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks.
      Anyway, I don't think it is just that easy to decide as you put it. If the price would be the same, if both would be same era (one is 2016 brand new with 3 year warranty, the other is second hand from 1980) yes, I would grab the OBXa no doubt, because I do like its sound.
      But because of that difference in price (around $2000 or more), reliability of the condition of a second hand OBXa, etc, it makes me consider the OB6. If it is possible to get a very similar sound with the OB6 to the OBXa then I am interested in the OB6. I didn't have a chance to try both, but I have seen your video comparison. To my ears they sound different, but I wonder if it is possible to make them sound even closer with some patch programming on the OB6 (as I didn't compare both, I don't know, and that is why I was asking you)
      I still feel you are not directly answering my original question. Can you get a very similar sound to the OBXa with the OB6?
      Is it worth paying $2000 more for the OBXa or you can get an almost identical sound with the OB6?
      Thanks!

  • @yahirthevyond
    @yahirthevyond 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So which Oberheim sounds better. The OB-X, the OB-Xa, or both?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      both are different but both are great

    • @yahirthevyond
      @yahirthevyond 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Oh, okay!

  • @djcovid-1997
    @djcovid-1997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The xa is more in your face. The x is more chill and subtle

  • @oriomenoni7651
    @oriomenoni7651 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man, the OB-X sounds SO MUCH better! I couldn't imagine there could be so much difference between two quite similar synths. The OB-Xa (an amazing synth) sounds thinner and much brighter and could even sometimes described as "cheesy" when compared side-by-side with the body and organic depth of the OB-X !

    • @marvinkmooneyoz
      @marvinkmooneyoz 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the X is more automatically just great sounding, the Xa is meant to be a bit more about programming, finding sounds that work. I think the X is a better party band synth, the Xa might be better for soundtrack type stuff, though of course im loaded with 80's memories, its hard to decide that kind of thing without hands on time.

  • @colincaetano909
    @colincaetano909 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At least the Prophet 6 is letting a new generation get a taste of discrete VCO analog. I have one and there really is no substitute.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Colin Caetano yes but the sound is very different to the OBs. I would say the P-6 sounds modern analog.

    • @javiceres
      @javiceres 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RetroSound What about the DSI OB-6?
      :)

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've been playing and recording with OB6. Sometimes I like it. Sometimes not sure. I just put on an old recording done with the Prophet-6 and realised how much more it does than the OB6. The P6 is special IMO. Not like these OBs but rich and sweet, dark and mysterious. It has an emotional sound to me. Extremely moody and evocative. If you make your own sounds, that is

    • @davebellamy4867
      @davebellamy4867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@retrosound72 I would have agreed as and when I got it but I'm listening to a CD I made in 2018 using the Prophet-6 with my own patches. It sounds ancient. It's not that like a P5 but it has the charm for me. It's my favourite synth ever and I've owned some old analogs. Not an OBX though or an OBXa. Would love to. Budget doesn't permit. If I did, the OB-6 would probably go for sale immediately but I'd keep the P6. No way would I ever sell it.

  • @dezwright3025
    @dezwright3025 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i know beggers cant be choosers but I wish you matched the patches better. on the pad the X has a way longer release. also how many voices does the Xa have? kinda sounds like 6

  • @rg2027x
    @rg2027x 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish Tom Oberheim (legend) would re-release the OB-X! or at least Xa..

    • @maccagrabme
      @maccagrabme 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Take a look at NAMM 2017: Shear Electronics Relic-6 Analog Poly Synthesizer, I think you might want one.

  • @Nomadologies
    @Nomadologies 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful demonstration! Are any of your patches for the OB-Xa available for download or purchase as sysex for OB-Xa's outfitted with Encore Midi?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Nomadologies thank you! :)
      I made these patches only for the demo and not stored. but sure can I make a soundbank but only as wave file.

  • @jaggass
    @jaggass 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yet people bang on about how great VST's are. Yeah right.

  • @zedster911
    @zedster911 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "cassette Interface" that show how vintage this instrument is! LOL

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +zedster911 :)

    • @nrdesign1991
      @nrdesign1991 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RetroSound Is the cassette interface used for recording music or for data?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +nrdesign1991 for sound data

  • @molekulaTV
    @molekulaTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You're getting better on chords hm?
    (liked the whole vid as .....music you know)

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +molekulaTV we getting all better in time ;)
      thank you!

    • @danielfisch389
      @danielfisch389 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +RetroSound the Beatles song 'Getting better' is my main inspiration to keep on playing.
      'It's getting better all the time (it can't get much worse)'... ha ha

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Daniel Fisch so true! :)

    • @molekulaTV
      @molekulaTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +RetroSound Hopefully :)