Incentivising parents to enhance their parenting in the home would be a great initiative. By offering support and resources, directly to families this empowers families to create nurturing environments that foster children's development. I agree that schools and tutoring should just be a multiplier not a replacement for lack of focused parental care.
Good points but you should also spend some time thinking on the structure of ownership of the means of production. In the 1930's Keynes was thinking that in the year 2000 there would be a crisis of too much free time. All the work would be done by machines..fast forward 90 years we are not there because all the benefits of technological advances are concentrated to the owner class not the workers. You need to start advocating for socialism, perhaps you would get the type of families you defend
How about one income should be able to support a family? Then the other partner can teach the kids? Or if one income cannot support a family, one partner should be paid to teach the kids. The US tax payer is currently paying the salaries of Ukrainians... Why can't it pay a salary to a parent to make sure their children are productive citizens?
The family can do whatever they want with the money. I just think that parents deciding whether they should take another shift at work or come home and read with their kids should be incentivized to do the latter. And right now, they are incentivized to do the former.
ADOS Kansas City Missouri Checking in
Incentivising parents to enhance their parenting in the home would be a great initiative. By offering support and resources, directly to families this empowers families to create nurturing environments that foster children's development. I agree that schools and tutoring should just be a multiplier not a replacement for lack of focused parental care.
Oh great. More welfare for single mothers.
Take away the tax exemption from churches and pay citizens to serve jury duty. I like that idea.
There's definitely money in politics
Good points but you should also spend some time thinking on the structure of ownership of the means of production. In the 1930's Keynes was thinking that in the year 2000 there would be a crisis of too much free time. All the work would be done by machines..fast forward 90 years we are not there because all the benefits of technological advances are concentrated to the owner class not the workers. You need to start advocating for socialism, perhaps you would get the type of families you defend
Good video
Such an important conversation. What do you know about the 'unschooling' movement? How does it make you feel?
It's a movement driven by a bunch of ridiculous people.
Hey Irami, wondering if this vid applies to higher ed?
Not in this video, but your opinion or thoughts on the work of artists?
How about one income should be able to support a family? Then the other partner can teach the kids? Or if one income cannot support a family, one partner should be paid to teach the kids. The US tax payer is currently paying the salaries of Ukrainians... Why can't it pay a salary to a parent to make sure their children are productive citizens?
The rich only care about exploiting the labor value out of workers. Capitalism is exploitation.
The family can do whatever they want with the money. I just think that parents deciding whether they should take another shift at work or come home and read with their kids should be incentivized to do the latter.
And right now, they are incentivized to do the former.