New York startup works to revive classic building techniques

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ค. 2024
  • Many of the world's greatest historical structures and buildings have been constructed with stone, but the material is largely no longer used in construction because of its cost. A New York startup is trying to change that.
    "CBS Saturday Morning" co-hosts Jeff Glor, Michelle Miller and Dana Jacobson deliver two hours of original reporting and breaking news, as well as profiles of leading figures in culture and the arts. Watch "CBS Saturday Morning" at 7 a.m. ET on CBS and 8 a.m. ET on the CBS News app.
    Subscribe to "CBS Mornings" on TH-cam: / cbsmornings
    Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
    Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
    Follow "CBS Mornings" on Instagram: / cbsmornings
    Like "CBS Mornings" on Facebook: / cbsmornings
    Follow "CBS Mornings" on Twitter: / cbsmornings
    Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
    Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @GrabASpriteB
    @GrabASpriteB หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Go to any downtown and you'll see just how beautiful normal everyday shops and other structures used to be built. It's not just stone that needs to make a comeback, but also brick. Stone materials can last centuries, as the video showed, and it's a plentiful and eco-friendly resource. Many of our buildings today will not be able to be passed down to future generations; a privilege we take for granted with our current historic structures.

  • @rosescott9299
    @rosescott9299 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    This is absolutely fantastic! The applications in restoring historical buildings and in modern building will be amazing. I truly hope that one day modern architecture brings back the beauty, craftsmanship and a bit of the gingerbread of old.
    And I can only imagine what a machine like this could’ve done in the hands of a brilliant artist like Michelangelo. Amazing!

  • @TikiHi77
    @TikiHi77 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I love stone work. So much more character.

  • @kenkarsonn
    @kenkarsonn หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    While the guy with the opposing view isn't wrong about sourcing being a hurdle for architectural masonry, the fact that there are stone structures still standing today built thousands of years ago is a testament to stone's long-term durability (under the right conditions). Obviously not every single building or structure should (or can) be made from stone. But certain buildings that serve key functions would benefit from being constructed with longevity in mind; and in exchange for higher upfront cost you'd likely save money over the long term, provided maintenance isn't super expensive.
    Again, building with stone doesn't work everywhere, but in places where it would work, it'd be great to see more of it.

    • @mr.x2567
      @mr.x2567 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      We all know he just wants us to buy his concrete junk instead.

  • @BrianLockett
    @BrianLockett หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    It's funny seeing skyscrapers being made from wood and now stonework making a comeback.

  • @carstarsarstenstesenn
    @carstarsarstenstesenn หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Stone may remain expensive, but this technology can still be used on a variety of materials and it definitely is a game changer

  • @medusagorgon8432
    @medusagorgon8432 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I cannot express in words how exciting this is for me! Finally!👏🏼😍

  • @gemmeldrakes2758
    @gemmeldrakes2758 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    A "5th of the cost of traditional methods" means we eliminate the cost of skilled stone carvers and stone masons.

    • @messagegoeshere741
      @messagegoeshere741 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Maybe, but handmade rugs, quilts, glasses, jewerly, etc still exist as novelty or hobbies. People will keep it alive because its an art.

    • @user-ny5yo2mc3x
      @user-ny5yo2mc3x 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      There was no market for these stone masons and carvers. It's a lost career it said so in the video

    • @gemmeldrakes2758
      @gemmeldrakes2758 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-ny5yo2mc3x There are many fewer stone carvers and stone masons nowadays, but the profession has not disappeared completely. The French found artisans to work on Notre Dame Cathdral.

    • @Blackgriffonphoenixg
      @Blackgriffonphoenixg 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Yes, but those skilled carvers and masons haven't been in demand for over half a century; We already completely relegated construction work to whichever large masses of workers can just cast thick concrete slabs and assemble them together.
      This isn't exactly the same thing as the whole "robots taking our jobs" event happening with automation.

    • @jonathanstensberg
      @jonathanstensberg 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      What carvers and masons? They’ve already been put out of work by concrete, steel, glass, and plastics. If anything, this is increasing the opportunities for these jobs.

  • @richarddevine8391
    @richarddevine8391 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is amazing, I wish this gentleman all the success.

  • @moxielouise
    @moxielouise หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I've been waiting years for this to happen, it's so exciting

  • @BlackOperations530
    @BlackOperations530 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I really love this video. I wish this new startup a lot of success!😊

  • @visualonestudio
    @visualonestudio หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is a brilliant and very creative idea. I would love to see a resurgence of stone architecture. More power to this guy! Do it!!

  • @hrysivjt67
    @hrysivjt67 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Stone looks so good

  • @rhejamphi
    @rhejamphi หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The round embellishment they showed looked very similar to what I've seen for polished quartz aggregate precast. For cnc milling of stone to really shine they will need to demonstrate Bas Relief and I'd be excited to see it.

  • @jenn976
    @jenn976 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    GOOD!!! I love carved stone, esp. on buildings. One of my favorite places in NYC is the Bethesda Terrace (arcade and fountain) within Central Park.

  • @JeremeyHowlett
    @JeremeyHowlett หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is amazing!

  • @the_traveling_texan
    @the_traveling_texan หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So cool!

  • @jonathanstensberg
    @jonathanstensberg 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    A stone bridge from 1000 years ago is still in use today, but all the steel and concrete bridges built 50 years ago need to be torn down and rebuilt. Need we say more?

  • @DonaldDucksRevenge
    @DonaldDucksRevenge หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's fantastic

  • @ChuckSilva
    @ChuckSilva หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome!❤🔥

  • @lokesh303101
    @lokesh303101 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes!

  • @jeffreylorberdesign
    @jeffreylorberdesign หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stone Rocks!

  • @graphene1487
    @graphene1487 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great marketing! Hope this becomes standard practice.

  • @DCDSG
    @DCDSG 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Finally people understanding the importance of beauty like our ancestors did. Hopefully this will spark a revolution in modern architecture

  • @Georges_Haussmann
    @Georges_Haussmann หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The longevity is the most important part, architecture can’t be sustainable if it doesn’t last more than decades.

  • @Omsip123
    @Omsip123 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How is this reviving a building technique? The technique is totally new and different. The product is revived.

  • @hummersd
    @hummersd หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I am curious why the final details would still be done by an artist; is the machine not capable of that detailed work despite it switching tools on its own and the designer able to put that information into the program? Nothing against the artist, but if one of the goals was to reduce costs, that would (or should) be a big one.

  • @michaelburbank2276
    @michaelburbank2276 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Negative dude apposing stone because he didn't think of it himself lol, would not want to hang out or work for that guy. On the other hand i would take a job at the stone place in a second

  • @paula.3221
    @paula.3221 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very cool 😎

  • @tericarter2019
    @tericarter2019 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    wow

  • @bubblez_x_beast8721
    @bubblez_x_beast8721 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think the professor has the right take on it. Will be used primarily for historic preservation but stone itself as a material is still very expensive. Good architecture isn't just about the materials itself, because while they are very important, a great architect can make near any construction material work for the form you want it to be and have it be cost effective. Having it be stone does not help in that last bit. Additionally, ornate designs just aren't in style anymore. There are numerous factors for that, but it's just the truth that the people crying out that today's architecture is "soul-less" is just people reminiscing about the past. Funnily enough, back when Beaux-Arts was in style some people were actually wanting a lot more simplicity in designs, which brought on the modernist movement. So, before you type another comment saying how you "wish we had beautiful buildings again!" try and do some history

  • @snitox
    @snitox หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The sun beating down on stone is also going to raise those electricity prices. Id suggest making like a cool stone frame for each reflective glass panel or something instead of going full stone panel.

    • @henrylivingstone2971
      @henrylivingstone2971 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you think that would raise power prices?

    • @snitox
      @snitox หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@henrylivingstone2971 cooling

  • @Benvenjtos
    @Benvenjtos หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How much water spends

  • @turtlebunch2
    @turtlebunch2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    nyc rich guy learns what cnc machining is

  • @michaelmangraviti6772
    @michaelmangraviti6772 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s CNC… it’s just CNC…

  • @minor1822
    @minor1822 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YEAHH

  • @raphael5165
    @raphael5165 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *I want to invest in that.*

  • @f.n.schlub2269
    @f.n.schlub2269 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @marcuswardle3180
    @marcuswardle3180 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    For ordinary buildings or modern ones this would be suitable but for restoration of old buildings especially the ones we have here in Europe maybe not. Part of the the beauty of the decoration of some the old buildings is the input put into it by the stonemasons. Many of the gargoyles on cathedrals, which hide roof pipe drains or just decoration, were created by the stonemason from their own thought. Their was no set plan for them. That is why the structure of the cathedral is so unique. When they are being replaced today the tradition of the stonemason creating his own style gargoyle. Many of the modern ones have influences from films of today. Darth Vader has appeared a couple of times! This new technique though helpful may be making the craft sterile?

  • @nznsi
    @nznsi 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    $300k-$400k for that robot? You could have custom built a 7 axis CNC with way more travel for a small fraction of that.

  • @nick2128
    @nick2128 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I’m curious why auto assembly lines are creating ornamental stone work for buildings.

    • @nick2128
      @nick2128 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🤦🏻

  • @cdabcdefg12345
    @cdabcdefg12345 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is not at all reviving classic techniques, this is a new technique hahahaha. Still cool

  • @hippiehillape
    @hippiehillape 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I've said this YEARS.

  • @DavidMiller-kf1ss
    @DavidMiller-kf1ss หลายเดือนก่อน

    I miss nyc. Too high there. $. Okla.❤

  • @oputoful
    @oputoful หลายเดือนก่อน

    03:13 Linkage between Zbrush and a robotic arm ! 😲

  • @sheenestevez6710
    @sheenestevez6710 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love stone work, but all that water used, could they not use sand or a grinding head instead?

    • @Sid-jx4gl
      @Sid-jx4gl หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Water can be recycled

  • @DurgaUsagi
    @DurgaUsagi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imnot impressed cause HANDS have been making work BEYOND THIS since forever ago.

  • @hazlox
    @hazlox 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It’s funny how we didn’t need it back then but somehow we needed it now. Why was it not expensive then and where is the money going? That is supposed to be there for the rebuilding that’s not going where it’s supposed to be going because it’s going where it’s not supposed to be going to fund people that aren’t supposed to be getting what they’re getting?

  • @julie5310
    @julie5310 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What about all that water?

    • @BFRIZZLE909
      @BFRIZZLE909 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point.

    • @TheLightningZap
      @TheLightningZap หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it can be reused

    • @pdmacguire
      @pdmacguire 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pretty easy, to filter out stone dust, which itself is useful

  • @markpalmer7832
    @markpalmer7832 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    But there are no structures good enough to hold stone up anymore.

  • @binershock
    @binershock 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Terra cotta

  • @davidcahan
    @davidcahan หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah and just look at all that water it uses. Hopefully they are recycling the wastewater? But not a guarantee

  • @jrholliday7
    @jrholliday7 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That professor is way off base, stone is not going anywhere any time soon

  • @yland6003
    @yland6003 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why does it beed to be real stone? Once you excavate that rock, it could take up to 500 million years to recycle back into a rock. 🏝️🌋🪨
    A buildings facade could be made of painted aluminum or plastic and you wouldn’t notice from far away.
    It takes significantly less time to recycle plastic and aluminum than rock.
    Buildings have a life span shorter than stone.

  • @Bodega180
    @Bodega180 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hope this takes off because modern architecture is terrible. We should be able to make the things of the past in less time and cheaper. I can guess why that’s not happening: corporate greed

  • @lortio88
    @lortio88 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's sad to see one of the greatest joys in life be replaced with robots: the connection between the artist and the material. This technology is hungry, voracious, and it's disguising how expensive it is with the idea that it's "cheaper" to manufacture. Those machines costing $300-400 thousand... and the environmental impact? See through the BS. This has the potential to be art, if it focuses on new design not replacing the oldies. But be honest... this is not cheaper than the traditional methods and certainly it removes the joy from the work of carving in stone that we as a species have enjoyed for centuries.

  • @jonathanmatthew1263
    @jonathanmatthew1263 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Maybe try paying the people who carve stone on buildings as much as those who work in them...
    Just kidding, these will only go on residential buildings. I left architecture school specifically because I wouldn't waste my life designing buildings I could never afford to live in.
    If you truly want more great buildings. Be better people worthy of having them. They will get built.

  • @jake1776
    @jake1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glass and metal has ruined every American city

  • @user-iq3th6ff6q
    @user-iq3th6ff6q หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope so, glass and steel buildings are crap.

  • @AIartBonaza
    @AIartBonaza หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Bring back affordable housing

    • @mostwant3dgov
      @mostwant3dgov หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Think about Blackrock's bottom line and their all cash transactions. Doesn't that matter more than affordable housing?

  • @LuisMendoza-pp9qi
    @LuisMendoza-pp9qi 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🤔 why not use cast concrete into molds?!?! It can be colored and can be mass produced in a fraction of the time and is still technically rock...🤔😡

  • @cesarumana3910
    @cesarumana3910 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The thing is I want to know how thousands of gallons of water the machine is using or the recycle the water

    • @HenricPelegric
      @HenricPelegric หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they must recycle, its cheaper than getting to pay a bill for nothing.

  • @HiThisIsMine
    @HiThisIsMine หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool for restoration… but why would we step backwards in design? Use new tech to create sculptures that were never possible. 3D printed sculptures is the way to go.

  • @buckbuck9225
    @buckbuck9225 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    More complex than the master?... wrong.dead wrong

  • @TBrl8
    @TBrl8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kinda sad in a way, that it’s a machine doing that and not a human.

  • @grumpyoldlady_rants
    @grumpyoldlady_rants หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    40+ hours for one panel plus do they reclaim and reuse the water? Interesting idea but it doesn’t seem practical. But, I can see it’s place in restoring old architecture.

  • @gilesclement
    @gilesclement หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool. Tech bro starts stone carving factory and employs as few people as possible to make the largest margins. What happens when there’s no artisans getting paid. Who’s buying the stuff computers make?

    • @BrianLockett
      @BrianLockett หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Did you miss the part where stoneworks have been rare altogether these days and how human artists are still used in the process to refine what the robots can't do?
      Seems to me that this is helping to preserve and revive something that's been becoming a lost art. Also, he's just one business--not the whole industry.

    • @mostwant3dgov
      @mostwant3dgov หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Jetsons.. duh!

  • @cesarumana3910
    @cesarumana3910 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why the reporter never ask about the water thousands of gallons of water is it recycling or wat

  • @imhotterthangod6481
    @imhotterthangod6481 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Or we could pay people to be stone masons. And build jobs where people can feel skilled, accomplished and respected. We are still not factoring in humanity in our future economic development.

  • @michaelg4019
    @michaelg4019 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    postmodernism and modernism architecture is not beautiful.

  • @bnalive5077
    @bnalive5077 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Lol. Zero tradesmen, zero skill, just machines. You’re not bringing anything back. Typical NY bs