As many other have pointed out, these ammo racks happen when small caliber shells cook-off. The reason we see tanks at higher BRs lose their turrets is because the big shells with a lot of propellant in the cartridge catch on fire and explode, causing a chain reaction. These early tanks have much lower caliber shells that aren't able to create the same chain reaction most of the time, and they cook off one-by-one, leading to this crackling and popping. Similar to when MG ammo cooks off in real life. Also, historically the charges used in these guns weren't nearly as powerful at the start of the war (with a few exceptions), so it makes sense that they don't explode as violently.
The Churchill tanks are quite unique. They can be fun at times and infuriating the majority of time. I received a Raider medal in the Churchill VII. I was too slow to get into position to fight anyone, so I went for the cap.
@@jwrockets I was in a game on the old Karelia where a T95 drove down the middle of the map and won by cap, it was never spotted and got the raider medal.
It just so happens that I have handy Steve Zaloga's "Soviet Lend-Lease Tanks of World War II," and Moscow received about 250 Churchills. About another 50 went to the fish of the Arctic Ocean. The Soviets didn't love the tank, though they did tend to issue them to elite Guards units.
The 57th Guards Tank Army used them, and I think it is the "Fire Bulge" camo & emblem (a preset style) which I have on my Churchill III. It was given away during the 75th anniversary of Kursk.
Had to laugh when you mentioned your Vk2801 going up against 10s. My T50-2 (before they retired it and brought it back) under the old physics got one Steel Wall out of 1500 games by going up against tier 10s. Those giant shells just kept miraculously ricocheting as I was ridge-running around like a madman.
I think the Churchill NA75 [North Africa 75] could work as a Tier V Premium UK Heavy Tank; 200 produced. Churchill IVs with 6-pounder guns replaced (under Operation Whitehot) by US 75 mm guns and mantlets from destroyed or scrapped Sherman tanks, fitted to Churchill IV cast turrets. Their performance was virtually identical to the VI. They were known as NA 75 (North Africa 75) where the first conversions took place, after 48 Shermans with new guns had been disabled by mines. Some Mark IIIs were also modified, using Mark IV turrets. To fit the Sherman mantlet required cutting away the front of the Churchill turret before it was welded in place, then the mantlet slot had to be cut away to give sufficient elevation. The Sherman 75 mm gun was designed for a left hand loader and the Churchill, in common with British practice, had a right hand loader. The gun was turned upside down and the firing controls adapted.[64] The conversion of about 200 tanks was carried out between March to June 1944 and the conversion project earned the officer in charge, Capt. Percy Morrell, an MBE and a promotion. Taken from the Churchill Tank Wikipedia Article
Needs to be pointed out, that although the Matilda fired 62 shots he only managed to land 47 on a target and even more embarrassingly, pen only 19 of them. If he saves some of those shots he would have won, easily.
QB, I have a pretty good idea about the ammo rack. It could quite well be the SIZE of the tanks ammo, the bigger the shell the tank has inside it the more explosive the ammo rack, so when you ammo rack a low tier tank, most of them have 37mm rounds in them so it more just burns in the tank instead of exploding. It's just less powder to burn.
They actually have ammo racks like that for some upper tier vehicles. For example, I play the Obj 261 a decent amount. About a week ago, I was playing on a grand battle map. I was escaping an Obj 907 that was arty hunting. Next thing I know, one of his teammates playing a Lion 2-shots me. Second shot was an ammo rack, and I exploded... just like that Valentine II.
People already pointed it out, but for the Soviets the Brits sent Matildas, Valentines, Tetrarchs, and Churchills, whilst the US sent Stuarts, Shermans, and Lees.
The Churchill III and the Matilda IV and the Valentine II were the tanks that the British gave the Soviet Union in 1942 as part of the Lend Lease Program that U.K and U.S.A created in order to help the U.S.S.R without being directly involved. U.S.A leased M3 & M5 Stuarts, M4 Shermans, M3 Half-tracks as well as planes, materials and other equipment, U.K also supplied materails and equipment to the U.S.S.R as well. The tanks in the game that is from the lend lease program is the M3 Stuart(U.S.A) and the 3 British tanks mentioned at the start of my comment.
i THINK that ammo rack happens because the shells that the low tier tanks fire arent explosive enough to blow the turret off so it just burns up the tank
Churchill, Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch were indeed given to the Soviets as lend lease so it kind of made sense as a way to get them in the game early. Stuart, Lee and Sherman were also lendleased but since US tree came in, it was not needed. The Soviets used 5000 British tanks in ww2 but it is only the first five hundred when they were in big trouble in 1941 that really mattered. They were mostly Matildas and Valentines, small numbers of Churchills and Tetrarchs were added later but were not really relevant. Thing that annoys me is there is no British tetrarch in game, only the Soviet one.
15:18 That's a coincidence. My record XP is also 3339 but in the Churchill III. Don't despair QB. I've noticed that the PZ V/IV also has a very high XP multiplier. Maybe try playing that tank more if you would prefer it as your XP record holder.
Crew 2.0 is like a ham-fisted attempt to combine the discretionary "build" feature of an RPG with an arcade style FPS game. Players will never be able to get all of the possible skills/perks, so you have to make choices to "customize" your build. Of course, it just creates a Frankenstein's monster of a game that fails to deliver either model and bleeds the customer-base dry.
QB, this video made me realise I was driving my Churchill III with incomplete ammunition load FOR YEARS :D I always had 105/35 and something was not adding up seeing your loadout. I never actually shot 140 shells but it's better to have the extra capacity, innit?
Yeah me and 2 other people got setup defending our cap in these, just 3 tanks parked side by side doing continuous rapid fire down range. Sadly in those days with the MM the enemy tanks where mostly impenetrable so we lost that one, but it was hilariously fun just going pew-pew-pew. Where talking over a round a second average rate of fire.
Playing this tank right now on Console to grind an Earn Op called Dream Machines due to it's base xp bonus (I think it's something like 38% Base XP + 40% XP Bonus (But on Console it displays 78% Bonus XP). I use Premium Rounds against any Tier 5+ Heavies and the Panzer V/IV which on Console has 870 HP at Tier 5. I still think it should be a British/Russian Dual Trainer. My Favourite tank to use for earn ops which require top 5 placements.
This is late, but you will only get the "rare" ammo rack at smaller caliber guns, i believe 57mm and lower is the range, and the reasoning is that when you get ammo racked, it goes off almost like a chain reaction, similar to fire crackers, however bigger calibers explode in a bigger radius, therefore the turret goes flying off, and the ammo will explode at once.
QB can you pls make a video on where you guide poeple on how to use the WG feedback office form, so more people will know how to have a say in the new changes.
Type 62 on Chinese server used to have a +100% Exp bonus I think, although the vehicle itself was not very good, it could ensure a first place by just suicide spotting.
The Churchill 3 doesn't get an extra bonus: It's bonus gets ADDED to the Base XP. All other tanks get their bonusses as a separate reward on top of their Base XP. This means: 1) Any further bonuses that add a percentage of the Base XP (like premium time and the daily's) get calculated of a higher base and are thus more profitable. This can add up to stupid amounts of XP. 2) More importantly, in the Churchill 3 the bonus to Base XP counts towards missions.
What?? Exactly 2.716 XP Points!! That's the same 2.716 XP Points that Skill4ltu got in his game ("Churchill III: Crazy Russian XP farmer!| World of Tanks"). It seems that the XP is capped at that number. 🤔
Answering your question at the beggining: Yes. The Brits have included Churchil tanks in the lend-lease deliveries, along with Matildas and Valentines. As for "unique" ammo rack sounds... If it's because during WWII propelant in ammo was changed, then my hats off to them.
If you lose/draw but still get a battle hero or epic medal, you get bonus XP for courageous resistance, which counts towards the base XP, according to the game. I know because my current record is 3410 (with premium) and that battle was a draw with the post battle results saying 1470 something base.
When I saw the lancen game I was like look at that, quickybaby will take forever to beat that and, then I thought wait i didn’t think of the Churchill and then I saw the Churchill game on stream
they should do a scrap yard game mode, so like you have all the tanks you have unlocked, but they can't be used as one machine, you have to make your own frankenmachine out of pieces, so you can use the lower off one tank, tracks and engine off another, and the turret off whatnot.. totally mix and match based on what you have unlocked already
Those low tier ammo racks are because the caliber of the gun is low meaning it's not substantial enough to cause a massive explosion that blow the turret off as mentioned in other comments
After spending over 30 milions credits and 22 milions free exp TODAY I have done a competitive crew for ka-ri 3 in the test server. So I just wait all the perks in the game.
have anyone tried to deliver their feedback via the Common test survey form? Its insane how one-sided the questions are e.g.: - there is no single question about how it is considered by players that the crew xp grind is getting way longer - instead of that you're asked whether the skills descriptions are improved (obvsly they are, but thats not the point wg) - the questions about wot plus only ask whether the benefits of this new premium model are enough, not at all that they are too strong or malicious to the game as a whole. This survey is an insult to players and a waste of time. wg knows that this patch is destroying the game and that there is an outcry in the community about it. thats the reason why they put so many different changes in one patch that we do not concentrate on one point and that they formulate their survey forms in they way we can hardly communicate our critique.
does the church 3 have a base xp bonus or is it just soooo easy to get huge EXP withit? :D my xp records very often with it, also my current high score^^
You can recreate a Churchill III in the British Tech Tree tank by upgrading the turret and fitting the 6 pdr. however, the Russian Lend Lease version is faster! 28 kph vs 25.
As many other have pointed out, these ammo racks happen when small caliber shells cook-off. The reason we see tanks at higher BRs lose their turrets is because the big shells with a lot of propellant in the cartridge catch on fire and explode, causing a chain reaction. These early tanks have much lower caliber shells that aren't able to create the same chain reaction most of the time, and they cook off one-by-one, leading to this crackling and popping. Similar to when MG ammo cooks off in real life.
Also, historically the charges used in these guns weren't nearly as powerful at the start of the war (with a few exceptions), so it makes sense that they don't explode as violently.
BRs? Someone's been playing too much war thunder
oh thax!!:) i needed to know after qb brought is up
Great explanation!
Wouldn’t have done it better!
lol imagine using historic reasoning and wargaming in same sentence
@@ImRandomDude Exactly this is an arcade game..Not even near reality.
Only 1,760,050,361,853 more experience until you fully max out your commander!
25K years without sleep to do so!
On only one tanks? are you kidding me? I have almost 300 tanks, how long it will be count to perk 9 crew on 300 tanks with 750 exp per battle???
@@Bynk333 119 years.
@@agcxd 119 million years more like
@@Bynk333 300 tanks?? Ffs
The Churchill tanks are quite unique. They can be fun at times and infuriating the majority of time. I received a Raider medal in the Churchill VII. I was too slow to get into position to fight anyone, so I went for the cap.
I think Jingles showed an IS-7 do the same thing many years ago. Good on you.
@@jwrockets I was in a game on the old Karelia where a T95 drove down the middle of the map and won by cap, it was never spotted and got the raider medal.
It just so happens that I have handy Steve Zaloga's "Soviet Lend-Lease Tanks of World War II," and Moscow received about 250 Churchills. About another 50 went to the fish of the Arctic Ocean. The Soviets didn't love the tank, though they did tend to issue them to elite Guards units.
The 57th Guards Tank Army used them, and I think it is the "Fire Bulge" camo & emblem (a preset style) which I have on my Churchill III. It was given away during the 75th anniversary of Kursk.
Had to laugh when you mentioned your Vk2801 going up against 10s. My T50-2 (before they retired it and brought it back) under the old physics got one Steel Wall out of 1500 games by going up against tier 10s. Those giant shells just kept miraculously ricocheting as I was ridge-running around like a madman.
At the battle of Kursk the soviets had only 2 heavy tank regiments. One was armed with the KV1S and the other Churchills.
Still behind Circon with his 4301. Time to step it up!
They’ve changed the base experience rating system over the years….I have over 2700 base experience in a Wolverine that I could never duplicate today 😮
I think the Churchill NA75 [North Africa 75] could work as a Tier V Premium UK Heavy Tank;
200 produced. Churchill IVs with 6-pounder guns replaced (under Operation Whitehot) by US 75 mm guns and mantlets from destroyed or scrapped Sherman tanks, fitted to Churchill IV cast turrets. Their performance was virtually identical to the VI. They were known as NA 75 (North Africa 75) where the first conversions took place, after 48 Shermans with new guns had been disabled by mines. Some Mark IIIs were also modified, using Mark IV turrets. To fit the Sherman mantlet required cutting away the front of the Churchill turret before it was welded in place, then the mantlet slot had to be cut away to give sufficient elevation. The Sherman 75 mm gun was designed for a left hand loader and the Churchill, in common with British practice, had a right hand loader. The gun was turned upside down and the firing controls adapted.[64] The conversion of about 200 tanks was carried out between March to June 1944 and the conversion project earned the officer in charge, Capt. Percy Morrell, an MBE and a promotion.
Taken from the Churchill Tank Wikipedia Article
Saw this live. Loved it! LOVED IT!
Churchill III was my first ever premium tank from way back in the day. Still love it.
Needs to be pointed out, that although the Matilda fired 62 shots he only managed to land 47 on a target and even more embarrassingly, pen only 19 of them. If he saves some of those shots he would have won, easily.
QB, I have a pretty good idea about the ammo rack. It could quite well be the SIZE of the tanks ammo, the bigger the shell the tank has inside it the more explosive the ammo rack, so when you ammo rack a low tier tank, most of them have 37mm rounds in them so it more just burns in the tank instead of exploding. It's just less powder to burn.
Its the same as the WoTB. If you finish a tank off with extremely low HP AND its an ammorack, it causes turret pop and a nice flash.
They actually have ammo racks like that for some upper tier vehicles. For example, I play the Obj 261 a decent amount. About a week ago, I was playing on a grand battle map. I was escaping an Obj 907 that was arty hunting. Next thing I know, one of his teammates playing a Lion 2-shots me. Second shot was an ammo rack, and I exploded... just like that Valentine II.
I bought the Churchill 3 just for those daily missions where you need top XP on your team.
Significant numbers of British Churchill (mk IV), Matilda and Valentine tanks were shipped to the USSR. according to wiki
hope this game will last for another 13 years. I hope WG doesn't make stupid decisions
thats a huge shame the next update is full of those stupid decisions that kill the game!
It's dead I won't return now. Rip my premium tanks but why waste your life grinding for years for an absolute comedic scam of a game
You mean decisions as in the past?
too late
This comment gotta be from the past
It is the lend lease Churchill 3. The UK also sent matildas and valentines which I think the soviets preferred as they were more reliable.
People already pointed it out, but for the Soviets the Brits sent Matildas, Valentines, Tetrarchs, and Churchills, whilst the US sent Stuarts, Shermans, and Lees.
The Churchill III and the Matilda IV and the Valentine II were the tanks that the British gave the Soviet Union in 1942 as part of the Lend Lease Program that U.K and U.S.A created in order to help the U.S.S.R without being directly involved. U.S.A leased M3 & M5 Stuarts, M4 Shermans, M3 Half-tracks as well as planes, materials and other equipment, U.K also supplied materails and equipment to the U.S.S.R as well. The tanks in the game that is from the lend lease program is the M3 Stuart(U.S.A) and the 3 British tanks mentioned at the start of my comment.
i THINK that ammo rack happens because the shells that the low tier tanks fire arent explosive enough to blow the turret off so it just burns up the tank
Yep for some years back in the early days of WOT, my highest XP was in the Churchill III.
Churchill, Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch were indeed given to the Soviets as lend lease so it kind of made sense as a way to get them in the game early. Stuart, Lee and Sherman were also lendleased but since US tree came in, it was not needed.
The Soviets used 5000 British tanks in ww2 but it is only the first five hundred when they were in big trouble in 1941 that really mattered. They were mostly Matildas and Valentines, small numbers of Churchills and Tetrarchs were added later but were not really relevant.
Thing that annoys me is there is no British tetrarch in game, only the Soviet one.
Churchill III is a great but very slow tank. Glad you are feeling better!
Just saw a team raptor boosting ad before this video haha
4:30 they only happen at low-tiers because of the small caliber but high amount of ammunition the tanks at that level carry.
15:18 That's a coincidence. My record XP is also 3339 but in the Churchill III. Don't despair QB. I've noticed that the PZ V/IV also has a very high XP multiplier. Maybe try playing that tank more if you would prefer it as your XP record holder.
I ammo racked a type 4/5 and it spit a column of fire out the top. I was like "wtf" and zoomed in on it when it went boom as well.
My personnal record is also with the churchil III, 11 kills, 3.9k dmg 3056 base exp, with prems 4584. Churchill is monstruous for getting exp so easy
Crew 2.0 is like a ham-fisted attempt to combine the discretionary "build" feature of an RPG with an arcade style FPS game. Players will never be able to get all of the possible skills/perks, so you have to make choices to "customize" your build. Of course, it just creates a Frankenstein's monster of a game that fails to deliver either model and bleeds the customer-base dry.
QB, this video made me realise I was driving my Churchill III with incomplete ammunition load FOR YEARS :D I always had 105/35 and something was not adding up seeing your loadout. I never actually shot 140 shells but it's better to have the extra capacity, innit?
4:12 My friends and I call that a "juicy ammo rack" and I agree with you, it seems to only happen at low tiers.
I had the Church III back in the CBT and it was a fun little tonk
Yeah me and 2 other people got setup defending our cap in these, just 3 tanks parked side by side doing continuous rapid fire down range. Sadly in those days with the MM the enemy tanks where mostly impenetrable so we lost that one, but it was hilariously fun just going pew-pew-pew. Where talking over a round a second average rate of fire.
back in the days that the chaffee and vk28 could meet tier 10s the chaffee was wild when it ended up in a tier 5 game
Playing this tank right now on Console to grind an Earn Op called Dream Machines due to it's base xp bonus (I think it's something like 38% Base XP + 40% XP Bonus (But on Console it displays 78% Bonus XP). I use Premium Rounds against any Tier 5+ Heavies and the Panzer V/IV which on Console has 870 HP at Tier 5.
I still think it should be a British/Russian Dual Trainer. My Favourite tank to use for earn ops which require top 5 placements.
I think Circon broke his exp record twice last month in this thing too when he was 3 marking it. Dirty stuff.
This is late, but you will only get the "rare" ammo rack at smaller caliber guns, i believe 57mm and lower is the range, and the reasoning is that when you get ammo racked, it goes off almost like a chain reaction, similar to fire crackers, however bigger calibers explode in a bigger radius, therefore the turret goes flying off, and the ammo will explode at once.
My boy out here lookin like a young Qui Gon Jin
The Soviets received Churchills, mostly 4s I think but also 3s. IIRC like 90 of them were lost at sea to the DKM and Luftwaffe.
quite funnily, Tiger II and E75, E50 get the long ammo rack explosion.
Yes, there is a tier 5 British Churchill I & a tier 6 Churchill VII.
I always take out my church when I don‘t have a lot of time and need to do the most xp of team mission….
QB can you pls make a video on where you guide poeple on how to use the WG feedback office form, so more people will know how to have a say in the new changes.
"back in the day" ah this game is old
Now I understand how 3k game in Churchill is my highest exp game.
same
Type 62 on Chinese server used to have a +100% Exp bonus I think, although the vehicle itself was not very good, it could ensure a first place by just suicide spotting.
I like to use Churchill III when I have the "highest EXP in my team" daily mission.
@ 2:34 Your RELOAD is sub 2 seconds - your RATE OF FIRE is over 30 per minute 🧐😉😂
Had a battle with Churchill 1 yesterday with 3300+ dmg. I was firing nonstop for 2 minutes.
those ammoracks happens on low tiers bec, they have big autoloder clips. and for it is special sound
The Churchill 3 doesn't get an extra bonus: It's bonus gets ADDED to the Base XP. All other tanks get their bonusses as a separate reward on top of their Base XP.
This means:
1) Any further bonuses that add a percentage of the Base XP (like premium time and the daily's) get calculated of a higher base and are thus more profitable. This can add up to stupid amounts of XP.
2) More importantly, in the Churchill 3 the bonus to Base XP counts towards missions.
On console their is a British premium tier 6 Churchill called the Bulldog I believe.
The Churchill III was my first premium and I adored it.
It was also the first tank I got a Kolobanov's in, years ago on dragons ridge.
That sound is because of their Ammo I believe because only low tiers have Machine Guns as a Weapon. Tack.tack.tack.tack. 😄
What?? Exactly 2.716 XP Points!! That's the same 2.716 XP Points that Skill4ltu got in his game ("Churchill III: Crazy Russian XP farmer!| World of Tanks").
It seems that the XP is capped at that number. 🤔
Answering your question at the beggining: Yes. The Brits have included Churchil tanks in the lend-lease deliveries, along with Matildas and Valentines.
As for "unique" ammo rack sounds... If it's because during WWII propelant in ammo was changed, then my hats off to them.
makes sense since there is russian matilda and valentine in the game as well
83% of WoT players have their exp record in this tank.
I'm not sure that that many players have the Churchill III...
@@Steamrick Yeah i just made it up.
If you lose/draw but still get a battle hero or epic medal, you get bonus XP for courageous resistance, which counts towards the base XP, according to the game. I know because my current record is 3410 (with premium) and that battle was a draw with the post battle results saying 1470 something base.
When I saw the lancen game I was like look at that, quickybaby will take forever to beat that and, then I thought wait i didn’t think of the Churchill and then I saw the Churchill game on stream
I love the Lansen. Not very good in it but always enjoy my games in it.
The different ammorack sound is per caliber.
I haven't played in 8 years but I still love your vids.
The Churchill III is pretty fun
Churchill 3 is my original tank and i love that thing
No, the unique ammo rack explosion happens to a turretless tanks.
I honestly havent seen ammorack for atleast couple of years now
Now imagine this tank with crew 2.0 and p2w equipment lmao
they should make tog can fit atleast 10crews and have very high XP multiplier
they should do a scrap yard game mode, so like you have all the tanks you have unlocked, but they can't be used as one machine, you have to make your own frankenmachine out of pieces, so you can use the lower off one tank, tracks and engine off another, and the turret off whatnot.. totally mix and match based on what you have unlocked already
So...this is my all time favorite vehicle. It was the tank that proved my moniker boardasher. My first ramming kill
Every tank will be OP in Quickybabies hand.
Also my best xp ever is in this tank. Perfect crew trainer for Soviets heavies. Gratz QB 🎉
Those low tier ammo racks are because the caliber of the gun is low meaning it's not substantial enough to cause a massive explosion that blow the turret off as mentioned in other comments
Xp may be broken on the Churchill 3 but you still played a damn good game buddy and really had to earn it as well.
They should make a Churchill Crocodile. The flamethrower doesn't do much damage but disables the enemy crew.
After spending over 30 milions credits and 22 milions free exp TODAY I have done a competitive crew for ka-ri 3 in the test server. So I just wait all the perks in the game.
have anyone tried to deliver their feedback via the Common test survey form?
Its insane how one-sided the questions are e.g.:
- there is no single question about how it is considered by players that the crew xp grind is getting way longer
- instead of that you're asked whether the skills descriptions are improved (obvsly they are, but thats not the point wg)
- the questions about wot plus only ask whether the benefits of this new premium model are enough, not at all that they are too strong or malicious to the game as a whole.
This survey is an insult to players and a waste of time.
wg knows that this patch is destroying the game and that there is an outcry in the community about it. thats the reason why they put so many different changes in one patch that we do not concentrate on one point and that they formulate their survey forms in they way we can hardly communicate our critique.
I got that same ammo rack inside the premium Italian TD. Scared the bejeezus out of me.
You can just buy it... ingame... for gold... cheap... worth it... best soviet crew trainer periord
When I realise a lot of WoT players weren't alive when Light tanks had dedicated MM...
My experience record is in a kv-1sa and it was 3.6k damage and 3.7k xp
4:23 These kind of ammoracks happen when the tank is carrying some kind of low-caliber machine gun. At least I think...
QB : WG is killing the game.... anyways look at this
Hey 👋🏼 how come you don’t put out any vids of the cold war stuff? I play through my xbox1 console
Those ammo racks only happen with tanks that use small calibre guns
Circon got it higher :P Cheers!
There was a "Raptor boost" commercial on your video. This is also KILLING the game. Why is WG doing NOTHING about these "CHEETERS"!!!
that matilda xD
3080 XP record with my beloved Udes 03
I filled out my form
does the church 3 have a base xp bonus or is it just soooo easy to get huge EXP withit? :D my xp records very often with it, also my current high score^^
Yes they diddo L & L with most tanks back in 1941-42 including valentine Churchills,starts etc
Insane game
Just wish i could be that good with any tank QB
I got a fadens medal the other day had no one to tell till now miss just didn't get it lol
My highest XP game is in the KV-5. Surprising because it can only see +1 mm
Can someone please explain why the Churchill 3 is a soviet tank and not a British tank in the tech tree ???
You can recreate a Churchill III in the British Tech Tree tank by upgrading the turret and fitting the 6 pdr. however, the Russian Lend Lease version is faster! 28 kph vs 25.
i dont care about what everybody sais about qb as a player, but i really miss these videos
I think XP records should be before premium bonus is added. Not everyone has premium