Carragher was right 15:20, That Gunners team during Wenger's (98-06) 1st decade, Arsenal should have at least won 1-2 champions leagues..... but fans are quick to forget how good the likes of AC Milan,Real and United with crazy amount of top quality legends all over! Arsenal Henry,Cole,Viera,Pires,Ljungberg Milan Maldini,Nesta,Gattuso,Dida,Cafu Real Raul,Zidane,Figo,Hierro,Makele United Stam,Keane,Scholes,Giggs ,Yorke,Cole ....just to name a few😅
Deep down knows what lad? That Lampard was surrounded by world class players?. Scholes surrounded by world class players?. Gerrard? won a champions league trophy on his own!!!. Why do you think Mourinho wanted him in the same very team Lampard played in? Even Rooney says Gerrard's the best out of that trio. Its a non debate now get to bed.
Funny thing is football. Back in the day most teams played 442 and they just never gelled for England.Today that midfield could play together, 433 has been tested and perfected and they would be complimentary
Gerrard and Scholes holding the middle of the pitch with Lampard in front of them is way too deadly in my eyes even if the striker can't finish. If they were prime in 2010s, England could've been EURO winners and World cup finalist.
Iv just come back from an Achilles tear and iv done some good work on my fitness. Now I’m back playing some light football I’m getting loads of little problems and pulls all over my body even shoulders from just standing up against people. ‘The pianist doesn’t run around the piano’ is what I’m finding out now 😂
Lampard was the best, if you look at the stats Lampard was the best but im a Chelsea fan and you ofc gonna say im subjective again look at the stats goals and assists. I watched all the games live on internet or tv of Lampard since 2006 and many Gerrard games
@@davidchampion1985 i forgot to say Gerrard was very close to Lampard, they both are legends, greats, theres not gonna be better mildfielders than them, they also had/have great personalities on the pitch and outside the pitch
I thought Scholes is the embodiment of the best and ideal midfielder you should learrn from to be the best in the world. Lampard was a marvel and explosive and always came through when his team needed him. I always thought Gerrard for me was the whole package. The various passes, low, high, wide and long. His vision of the game was impeccable and challenges were solid. His ability to shoot from anywhere and ability to carry, organise and lead his team. It just baffles me that all the 3 were playing at the same era in their prime , yet they could not even win a European cup, that's scandalous!
Career stats of Lampard vs Gerard Most goals: Lampard Lowest minutes per goal: Lampard Most assists: Lampard Lowest minutes per assist: Lampard Most passes: Lampard Best career pass percentage: Lampard Most tackles: Gerrard Best tackle success percentage: Gerrard Make of that what you will (and i'm stating this from memory, if I am wrong, feel free to correct me (with references))
They were great but still from 2000 to 2005 in europe were some crazy strong teams too especially in italy my team Ac Milan top , Juventus was strong too
Scholes has admitted he couldn’t have done the things Gerrard did for Liverpool but Gerrard could do what scholes did for Man U. And I’ve always said it was between Gerrard and lamps. But for me Gerrard knicks it
I’d say Lampard because he could do at least 90% of the roles of Gerrard or Scholes, but neither of them could do even 50% of the goal scoring prowess that Lampard had… respect to all 3 of them though, all in the same tier
The only correct answer here. United and Liverpool fans will claim Scholes/Gerrard is better because of that 10% that they do better, but neither of them are even remotely close to Lampard's level when it comes to goals and assists.
@@theplaymaker6336 guy thinks g/a are 90% of a midfielders job 🤨 they all played different roles in different systems. All were better than the other depending on how you want to play
Imagine joining your boyhood club at 16 or whatever young age and being told to clean cars over and over and maybe not train enough to stay fit, talk about a hinderance😂
Really? Try this then- you can go 3 games unbeaten and you draw them all. You can lose 2 games and win 1. You have the same amount of points. Stats are easily massaged and misleading
Carragher is going to say Gerrard, Terry will say Lampard and Neville will obviously say Scholes. In my opinion and as a neutral it has to been Gerrard, he had everything in his locker. The most complete English midfielder i have ever seen
@DTM93 we are talking about the best midfielder in the Prem, not who won what with their clubs and my opinion as a football fan is Gerrard is the best out of the three. That is my opinion, you don't agree with me and I won't agree with you, because we have different opinions on what we like in a footballer
@@bluemotion14 Tbf i never once said i agree or disagree or had an argument about who was or wasn't better. I just pointed out how crazy it is that he never won a single Premier League trophy despite having such ability.
Lampard made runs into box and was a phenomenal goalscorer , Scholes vision was world class , his range of passing , technically one of the greatest ever midfielders , but Gerrard had all of the above , a leader of men , box to box , short balls, 60 yard pings across the pitch could header , tackle , strike the ball perfectly , grab games by the scruff of the neck and get the win for us ...every attribute a midfielder needs Gerrard was elite "Scholes couldn't tackle , and lacked strength "his ability made up for that though tbh" ... Lampard also couldn't really tackle or go 2 toe with a Keane or Viera , Gerrard did !!! No disrespect whatsoever to Scholes or Lampard but Stevie G beats them both!!! And imo the England situation was simple , we needed a gaffer to have the bollox to drop one of them !!!
Interesting. You don't bring up the fact he is a racist. (In October 2012, he decided not to appeal a four-match ban for racially abusing Aton Ferdinand.) We forget too quickly.
Lampard over Gerrard. Your having a f`in biased laugh. terry was one of the best centers but clearly doest know how midfield works. i`m truly insulted by this comment.
Think all three were amazing in their own right From a Liverpool fan Think Gerrard could have played with either of the other two Would love to have see all 3 play in a 4 3 1 2. Gerrard and lamps in midfield, scholes in the hole before the front 2. I am sure it could have been worked out at club level.
@Cora342 Sorry, but this is a terrible idea. The only way they can play together is a 4-3-3 or a 4-1-2-1-2. The latter is a diamond formation. In both cases, scholes should be infront of the defence guarding them, dictating the play. That's his strength. He ain't an athlete. Also gives both stevie and frank licence to be more box to box.
Europe 😂 believe me, as an Italian, they don’t. Nostalgia has overrated scholes massively. At the time, he was never considered a player anywhere near the level of the very best centre midfielders - he never made a team of the season, never won Man U player of the year, and didn’t even get in the England side.
😂 pick some random quotes and ignore the facts. You can find quotes on pretty much any player - if you think he compares anywhere near those players, or even others from that era (pirlo, busquets etc.) then you’re deluded. He’s never received a single vote for the ballon d’or, never made a team of the year, never got player of the year for his club, and didn’t even start for his country in CM. They are facts. But you go ahead and find a quote.. 😂
The 3 of them thrived in different roles and aspects on the pitch. Scholes a bit deeper, Gerrard a bit box-to-box, and Lampard a bit higher. But the undeniable truth is that if you name the top 3 deep lying CMs, Scholes wont make everyone's list. If you name the top 3 box-to-box midfielders, Gerrard might not make everyone's list. But if you name the top 3 scoring midfielder's ever--you can't ignore the numbers Lampard has put up. Its just an anomoly. That being said, of those 3 roles, only one distinctly benefits from a single, glaring statistic, and thats Lampard. Also, some might weigh "impact" heavily and measure it by the amount of adversity they had been dealt. Tbh, Scholes and Lampard had incredible talent around them--but that probably shouldnt work against them if we're being fair.
Scholes "suck my toes"i seen his entire career and was nowhere near the top players. people waffle about Stevie G, lamps who were far better. Kdb not on that level is far better. Toesy was proper mid.
This flop from Liverpool shouldn't be sharing table with JT. This is thumb 👎 for sky. You should be bringing Vidic, Ferdinand, Calvaho etc to sit with JT the legend.
It’s not even a debate. Lampard has more goals assists goals outside the box and the best defensive numbers in goals conceded. He scored in multiple big games and finals . Never let the team down and the model professional.
Are you really trying to give Lampard credit for that legendary back 5 Chelsea had keeping clean sheets like it was nothing. That is beyond delusion. I can assure you, Lampard had the bare minimum to do with those numbers. Fantastic attack-minded player though, no doubting that.
@ The fact that lamps was a part of the midfield that was responsible for a number of key games that Chelsea had played for the majority with 10 men and the tracking back helping the defence is a part of his game that is totally overlooked. The total midfielder and the numbers back him up
Yeah it’s that racist that it’s got that gibbering cabbage Micah Richards on it and Clinton Morrison who can’t string 2 coherent sentences together 👍😊🏴
Yet one of the most evidently charitable blokes in English football. He didn't do himself any favours obviously, but I think it's clear he's a better man in reality than he is in the eyes of the world/media/non Chelsea fans
This argument is dead... as the dust has settled the answer became clear. Gerrard was the best, and probably the best CM the prem has ever seen. If you disagree, then you are still a fan boy, and rational thought has not yet dominated your opinions.
Steven could actually defend though and was a better dribbler, id take take Pauls i.q for the game over gerrard. But i do agree with that comment, 3 incredible players but you could never win a prem nowadays with those 3 as your midfield.@@anweshchatterjee7595
It's embarrassing to hear how amazed Terry is at the most basic organisation that a probationary PE teacher would deliver from day 1, Terry struggles to string a sentence together and he's a coach?? Ffs
Personally I’m gonna say that Jamie says Gerrard and Terry says Lampard
But numbers never lie
Rio say scholes 🤣🤣🤣
@@Manniii15They can be misleading though
Gerrard was and is the man
Lol yeah but he really wanted to say scholes.
“I’d leave the pitch in a coffin for that man” they dont make players like that anymore
The time he got a kick in the face against Arsenal comes to mind
Would like to see more John Terry punditry, barely hear from him these days. Or an opportunity as a manager, he was a fantastic leader in his day.
he's coaching at chelsea
@@jonathangoliath91 ah ok that's good
unfortunately when you get accused of racism, the world ends you, even if proven not guilty. i miss him
@@TheKernal96_ Yet Carragher is about gobbing off everywhere after his incident. I enjoy when he speaks, he did so much in the game.
If he wasn't recorded saying racist things then terry would have some respect.
Even though Terry is a guest he seems the better Journalist more dignified more truthful more grace, better football iq.
Captain leader legend
Back in the day when Sky had their pundits suited and booted. Oh how it’s changed now.
Grow up
correct but there is one word to explain that. COVID
Why does that matter lol? Just admitting you’re old and weird.
You're one of those people that would look at a photo of the 1930s with men in suits, women in dresses and then say, "when people dressed smart" 🙄😂
They used to be good pundits too. All trash now
Terry isnt aging..😂
This was 10 years ago pal
@@Harve-cf3rhand he looks the same now that’s the whole point 😂😂
That’s what happens when you sell your soul to the devil 😈
They're all on about the same level. The real question is; how could they not win a major tournament when playing together for England?
Lampard for me o
The only midfielder in the premier League Top ( 10 ) goal scorer list
Incredible
I love John Terry so much what he done for Chelsea I'll forever be grateful for 💙🙏
You’re either Reform or Tory and live in Kent
Like falling over when taking a pen in Moscow then crying like a baby about it
broooo JT keeps pissing at carragher LMAOOO ''no not you'' ''u r definitely a moaner'' AAAH MY CAPTAIN XD
Carragher was right 15:20,
That Gunners team during Wenger's (98-06) 1st decade, Arsenal should have at least won 1-2 champions leagues.....
but fans are quick to forget how good the likes of AC Milan,Real and United with crazy amount of top quality legends all over!
Arsenal
Henry,Cole,Viera,Pires,Ljungberg
Milan
Maldini,Nesta,Gattuso,Dida,Cafu
Real
Raul,Zidane,Figo,Hierro,Makele
United
Stam,Keane,Scholes,Giggs ,Yorke,Cole
....just to name a few😅
Liverpool fans - gerrard
Chelsea fans - Lampard
Man U fans - Scholes
Honesty and neutrals - Lampard
@@richieonefam1700 arsenal?
@ nobody
Vieira
Though not English
Lampard was the best and most talismanic, and everyone knows it deep down.
@@Yves36O Stealing. Thieving.
Disagree- Scholes most talented (especially technically), Lampard most clinical, Gerrard most talismanic
Deep down knows what lad? That Lampard was surrounded by world class players?. Scholes surrounded by world class players?. Gerrard? won a champions league trophy on his own!!!. Why do you think Mourinho wanted him in the same very team Lampard played in? Even Rooney says Gerrard's the best out of that trio. Its a non debate now get to bed.
@@PaxBritannica34563 Maybe but neither Lamps nor Scholes ever lost their team the title race by slipping up 🤡
Scholes
Funny thing is football. Back in the day most teams played 442 and they just never gelled for England.Today that midfield could play together, 433 has been tested and perfected and they would be complimentary
Gerrard and Scholes holding the middle of the pitch with Lampard in front of them is way too deadly in my eyes even if the striker can't finish. If they were prime in 2010s, England could've been EURO winners and World cup finalist.
viera and scholes in the middle would of been unstoppable
Mourinho was out Pouring the rain? Magician
out in the pouring rain -.-
@ not what jt said
Stevie G. Everytime,never seen a player with an engine like him.❤
If he was so amazing why didn't he win a single league title in 17 seasons?
Had to be Scholes as he was the absolute best and gets the best comments about his play from top international players.
Iv just come back from an Achilles tear and iv done some good work on my fitness. Now I’m back playing some light football I’m getting loads of little problems and pulls all over my body even shoulders from just standing up against people.
‘The pianist doesn’t run around the piano’ is what I’m finding out now 😂
Lampard was the best, if you look at the stats Lampard was the best but im a Chelsea fan and you ofc gonna say im subjective again look at the stats goals and assists. I watched all the games live on internet or tv of Lampard since 2006 and many Gerrard games
but, if you think gerrard had to carry the team for years, frank had everything he needed to do well
Lampard didn't have to track back and tackle a RW to cover for Djimi Traore
@@davidchampion1985 yeah exactly, both top top players but id give gerrard all time best, lamps 2nd
@@davidchampion1985 i forgot to say Gerrard was very close to Lampard, they both are legends, greats, theres not gonna be better mildfielders than them, they also had/have great personalities on the pitch and outside the pitch
@@cfcwhit3247 i agree Chelsea had a stronger team ofc it matters a lot
I thought Scholes is the embodiment of the best and ideal midfielder you should learrn from to be the best in the world.
Lampard was a marvel and explosive and always came through when his team needed him.
I always thought Gerrard for me was the whole package. The various passes, low, high, wide and long. His vision of the game was impeccable and challenges were solid.
His ability to shoot from anywhere and ability to carry, organise and lead his team.
It just baffles me that all the 3 were playing at the same era in their prime , yet they could not even win a European cup, that's scandalous!
Scholes was horribly misused in the England team.
@fi7959 you're right and this really upsets me,
@@fi7959different era. Nobody was playing 4-3-3 it was all 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1
Stevie G was great for the odd slip or trip IMO it is Lampard, Scholes and a distant 3rd Gerrard
Scholes and lampard were great players , Gerard could do it all , won games on his own year after year it’s not even close,miles ahead of the other 2
“Best midfielder in PL history” without a PL trophy? 😆😆😆 you must be kidding
Won games on his own year after year, but not enough to win a league title 🤣
Career stats of Lampard vs Gerard
Most goals: Lampard
Lowest minutes per goal: Lampard
Most assists: Lampard
Lowest minutes per assist: Lampard
Most passes: Lampard
Best career pass percentage: Lampard
Most tackles: Gerrard
Best tackle success percentage: Gerrard
Make of that what you will
(and i'm stating this from memory, if I am wrong, feel free to correct me (with references))
They were great but still from 2000 to 2005 in europe were some crazy strong teams too especially in italy my team Ac Milan top , Juventus was strong too
As usual they forgot to tell you when this clip was originally recorded!
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Lampard have everything combined name it 💙
Gerrard could play more positions, was a better tackler
@@GoGetYourShineboxno he couldn’t 😭 slippy G
Lampard failed balon d'Or by a whisker just because of ronaldinho. That says it all
I fink. I would have loved to read JT's English exam papers.
Essex boys do some inexplicable things with our language. 😂
That's all im gonna say.
Scholes has admitted he couldn’t have done the things Gerrard did for Liverpool but Gerrard could do what scholes did for Man U. And I’ve always said it was between Gerrard and lamps. But for me Gerrard knicks it
When they speak, you can see why JT won the trophies he did.
And why Carra had as many trophies as he DIDNT
I’d say Lampard because he could do at least 90% of the roles of Gerrard or Scholes, but neither of them could do even 50% of the goal scoring prowess that Lampard had… respect to all 3 of them though, all in the same tier
L take
Very L take
🤣🤣
The only correct answer here. United and Liverpool fans will claim Scholes/Gerrard is better because of that 10% that they do better, but neither of them are even remotely close to Lampard's level when it comes to goals and assists.
@@theplaymaker6336 guy thinks g/a are 90% of a midfielders job 🤨 they all played different roles in different systems. All were better than the other depending on how you want to play
The stats crowd are all for Lampard, i fell sorry for him now.
All three
Lampard the best and Mourinho best manager
I hate peoole like Terry, he comes of as really likeable dude but his ego will have him sleeping with your wife after being friendly
Correct
Lampard, daylight, Scholes, Gerrard
Lampard he scored more galls
Reasons why JT is the best captain in England argue with your phone 😂
Imagine joining your boyhood club at 16 or whatever young age and being told to clean cars over and over and maybe not train enough to stay fit, talk about a hinderance😂
Wayne bridge was best
😂😂
Keane. All
Day long.
So, Scholes then?
People lie numbers dont. Unless we're talking about Hazard
I look at stats and they never lie.
Really? Try this then- you can go 3 games unbeaten and you draw them all. You can lose 2 games and win 1. You have the same amount of points. Stats are easily massaged and misleading
Carragher is going to say Gerrard, Terry will say Lampard and Neville will obviously say Scholes.
In my opinion and as a neutral it has to been Gerrard, he had everything in his locker. The most complete English midfielder i have ever seen
The most complete midfielder England has ever seen with no Premier League titles is mental.
@DTM93 we are talking about the best midfielder in the Prem, not who won what with their clubs and my opinion as a football fan is Gerrard is the best out of the three. That is my opinion, you don't agree with me and I won't agree with you, because we have different opinions on what we like in a footballer
@@bluemotion14 Tbf i never once said i agree or disagree or had an argument about who was or wasn't better.
I just pointed out how crazy it is that he never won a single Premier League trophy despite having such ability.
Then you have only seen Gerrard mate
@@rickybrunch2968 i have seen them all ,gerrard nicks it for me
Raw talent scholes but Stevie g could control a game against any team
Real men know lampard is tiers above gerrard, the consistency is unmatchable
Terry looks great.
It was about 10 years ago
Oh its the Spitter
And the racist
Lampard for all day
Gerrard is the GOAT 🐐
If they played in todays game all 3 would work good but not in 4-4-2
Sadly, it's his (off pitch) lifestyle that probably killed what should have been a great punditry career for JT
I wish terry wasnt such a scumbag he is a likeable character and a proper example of a good footballer on and off the pitch.
Stevie g was the more complete of the 3 he could win a game on his own the other 2 couldn't do that and I'm man u fan
England’s most Glorious Failures
..."he done everyfing"?!😆🤣really...as an adult....everyfing?!
Steve Gerrard hands above both of them no debate
U are delusional 😂
Terry is so embarrassing 🎉
Lampard made runs into box and was a phenomenal goalscorer , Scholes vision was world class , his range of passing , technically one of the greatest ever midfielders , but Gerrard had all of the above , a leader of men , box to box , short balls, 60 yard pings across the pitch could header , tackle , strike the ball perfectly , grab games by the scruff of the neck and get the win for us ...every attribute a midfielder needs Gerrard was elite "Scholes couldn't tackle , and lacked strength "his ability made up for that though tbh" ... Lampard also couldn't really tackle or go 2 toe with a Keane or Viera , Gerrard did !!! No disrespect whatsoever to Scholes or Lampard but Stevie G beats them both!!! And imo the England situation was simple , we needed a gaffer to have the bollox to drop one of them !!!
The greatest Epl defender says he fears Henry the most, but gen-z say Henry wasn't good
Interesting. You don't bring up the fact he is a racist. (In October 2012, he decided not to appeal a four-match ban for racially abusing Aton Ferdinand.) We forget too quickly.
Realistically as an Arsenal fan, those english guys were overrated, we had Patrick, world cup winner 1998, and Euro cup winner 2000😅😅
John terry the club rep…. In ibiza😂
Lampard over Gerrard. Your having a f`in biased laugh. terry was one of the best centers but clearly doest know how midfield works. i`m truly insulted by this comment.
Did he ask about me. Shut up Jamie
So for terry it was actually Scholes..
💙
If any of them say Scholes... I'll be very surprised
Terry sort I've said scholes
@raqeebahmed9932 yeah, was a pleasant surprise to hear him shout him out
Cara has no clue what’s he talking about. Just leave it for JT
Get JT in punditry or something ASAP. Legend
Gerrard didn’t win even a single PL. so he should not even be in the debate. Lampard and Scholes are miles clear than Slippy Gerrard.
Scholes, Gerrard, Lampard, all day long.
You listen this and you know Jamie wasn’t a good teammate tbh
Scholes was like a composer, Stevie G was like a DJ and Frank was like a successful karaoker. Simple as that.
Except Stevie can also/have also been a composer and a karaoker, byt can't say the same about the other two
Think all three were amazing in their own right
From a Liverpool fan
Think Gerrard could have played with either of the other two
Would love to have see all 3 play in a 4 3 1 2. Gerrard and lamps in midfield, scholes in the hole before the front 2.
I am sure it could have been worked out at club level.
@Cora342 Sorry, but this is a terrible idea. The only way they can play together is a 4-3-3 or a 4-1-2-1-2. The latter is a diamond formation. In both cases, scholes should be infront of the defence guarding them, dictating the play. That's his strength. He ain't an athlete. Also gives both stevie and frank licence to be more box to box.
Lol Scholes Lampard gerard couldn’t play together
England says slippy. Europe says scholes. Simple as that
Europe 😂 believe me, as an Italian, they don’t. Nostalgia has overrated scholes massively. At the time, he was never considered a player anywhere near the level of the very best centre midfielders - he never made a team of the season, never won Man U player of the year, and didn’t even get in the England side.
@@danc1051Zidane and Xavi still in Europe? Just checking
😂 pick some random quotes and ignore the facts. You can find quotes on pretty much any player - if you think he compares anywhere near those players, or even others from that era (pirlo, busquets etc.) then you’re deluded. He’s never received a single vote for the ballon d’or, never made a team of the year, never got player of the year for his club, and didn’t even start for his country in CM. They are facts. But you go ahead and find a quote.. 😂
The 3 of them thrived in different roles and aspects on the pitch. Scholes a bit deeper, Gerrard a bit box-to-box, and Lampard a bit higher.
But the undeniable truth is that if you name the top 3 deep lying CMs, Scholes wont make everyone's list. If you name the top 3 box-to-box midfielders, Gerrard might not make everyone's list. But if you name the top 3 scoring midfielder's ever--you can't ignore the numbers Lampard has put up. Its just an anomoly.
That being said, of those 3 roles, only one distinctly benefits from a single, glaring statistic, and thats Lampard.
Also, some might weigh "impact" heavily and measure it by the amount of adversity they had been dealt. Tbh, Scholes and Lampard had incredible talent around them--but that probably shouldnt work against them if we're being fair.
Scholes "suck my toes"i seen his entire career and was nowhere near the top players. people waffle about Stevie G, lamps who were far better. Kdb not on that level is far better. Toesy was proper mid.
You can tell J.T don't like Jamie . TBF it's hard to like him
I dont think anyone wants to be friends with Jamie anyway
Scholes is the best simple as when Henry says scholes is the player he wanted in his team I listen
Scholes is far better than the other two.
I love JT spoken English, not Jamie I’m sorry
Gerrard was the ULTIMATE
This flop from Liverpool shouldn't be sharing table with JT.
This is thumb 👎 for sky. You should be bringing Vidic, Ferdinand, Calvaho etc to sit with JT the legend.
carragher ahead of ferdinand and campbell ==> joker !!!!
Scholes by far just look at the team he controlled. Gerrard and lampard couldn't control games
Gerrard all long
I used to hate him but he speaks very well and comes across very intelligently.
It’s not even a debate. Lampard has more goals assists goals outside the box and the best defensive numbers in goals conceded. He scored in multiple big games and finals . Never let the team down and the model professional.
Are you really trying to give Lampard credit for that legendary back 5 Chelsea had keeping clean sheets like it was nothing. That is beyond delusion. I can assure you, Lampard had the bare minimum to do with those numbers. Fantastic attack-minded player though, no doubting that.
@ The fact that lamps was a part of the midfield that was responsible for a number of key games that Chelsea had played for the majority with 10 men and the tracking back helping the defence is a part of his game that is totally overlooked. The total midfielder and the numbers back him up
Two racists waxing lyrical on a racist channel.
Yeah it’s that racist that it’s got that gibbering cabbage Micah Richards on it and Clinton Morrison who can’t string 2 coherent sentences together 👍😊🏴
Terry just looks nasty piece of work
Yet one of the most evidently charitable blokes in English football. He didn't do himself any favours obviously, but I think it's clear he's a better man in reality than he is in the eyes of the world/media/non Chelsea fans
Does he scare you darling? 👍😊🏴
This argument is dead... as the dust has settled the answer became clear.
Gerrard was the best, and probably the best CM the prem has ever seen.
If you disagree, then you are still a fan boy, and rational thought has not yet dominated your opinions.
You do see a pianist learn theory about the piano
Scholes.. even Zidane said so
And Scholes' own words: Gerrard could've done what I did at United but I couldn't have done what he did at Liverpool
Steven could actually defend though and was a better dribbler, id take take Pauls i.q for the game over gerrard. But i do agree with that comment, 3 incredible players but you could never win a prem nowadays with those 3 as your midfield.@@anweshchatterjee7595
Gerrard was the most complete of the 3 ,any1 that says different is either biased or hasnt a clue
Terry turncoat can't stand him 🎉
Why does Carragher still have a punditry career after gobbing at a child? People have been cancelled for far less.
Why are u so botheted
@@JosephMoore-Gilbertbecause Carragher constantly talks crap and is biased towards Liverpool even though he's an Evertonian
It's embarrassing to hear how amazed Terry is at the most basic organisation that a probationary PE teacher would deliver from day 1, Terry struggles to string a sentence together and he's a coach?? Ffs
The mistake you keep making is that you think you matter 👍🤔🏴