Warren Buffett: A "Storm is Brewing" in the Banking Industry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2024
  • Click this link to get up to 15 free stocks from moomoo U.S when you make a qualified deposit! Terms & Conditions Apply: j.moomoo.com/00mF1u
    Legendary investor Warren Buffett is warning about a 2.2 trillion dollar storm that is about to strike the banking industry. The consequences of which will likely be felt for years to come. As you are about to see, a problem of this magnitude didn’t form overnight. The origins of this crisis date back more than 40 years. Now, it’s finally too big to ignore. With each passing day, we are getting closer to impact. Listen to Buffett explain.
    To truly understand what Buffett is saying, you first need to understand the business model of a bank. At their core, banks are in the business of lending money. On the surface, it seems like a pretty simple business. Banks have money and they lend that money out to people and businesses that need it. The borrower pays the bank back the money, with interest, over time until the loan is paid off in full. The borrower is happy because they got to purchase something they otherwise wouldn’t have been able to afford. The bank is happy because it was able to make money on the loan in the form of interest paid by the borrower.
    If you have ever interacted with a bank, you probably understand this part of the banking model first hand. However, the actual loaning of the money is only part of the story. What really matters in understanding Buffett’s warning is how banks even get the money that they loan out in the first place. This is an often hidden aspect of the banking business model that has the potential to make things extremely risky. What I’m about to say may come as a surprise to some people but when banks give out a loan, they actually aren’t lending out their own money.
    Topics covered in the video include Warren Buffett, the banking industry, Silicone Valley Bank, regional banks, the banking crisis, real estate, commercial real estate, commercial real estate crash, the housing market, investing, Warren Buffett’s portfolio, and the stock market

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @InvestorCenter
    @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Click this link to get up to 15 free stocks from moomoo U.S when you make a qualified deposit! Terms & Conditions Apply: j.moomoo.com/00mF1u

    • @BlueStratDude
      @BlueStratDude 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Can you do _anything_ about the financial advisor shill threads that get plastered in every video's comments? They're as disheartening as they are scummy.

    • @cunning-stunt
      @cunning-stunt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You didn't mention fractional reserve banking which makes loan defaults so much more scary.

    • @Elizabethgreen779
      @Elizabethgreen779 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *I am fortunate I made productive decisions that changed my life forever (accumuIated over a MiI) through my finance-mentor. I'm a single parent, bought my house in January and hoping to retire at 52 by next year.*

    • @Elizabethgreen779
      @Elizabethgreen779 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *sear ch the name, lf you care.*

    • @Elizabethgreen779
      @Elizabethgreen779 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *Rebecca Martin Watson*

  • @bapi6643
    @bapi6643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +533

    The banks will not “take a loss”, the politicians will make sure that doesn’t happen. The taxpayer will pay for the losses

    • @user-sm9tn2fi6s
      @user-sm9tn2fi6s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Banking is a game for corporations servicing debts that people generally have no hope of paying back because of the deprecation of the value of the money they are paid. Winner takes all as the rich gets richer and the poor get poorer.
      Usury was the term that use to explain this application. As the workers say to their bosses the money you give us for working for you is not enough to live on.
      Technically Banks are authorized to print false promissory notes because our governments are too weak to stop them.

    • @saeedmustapha1334
      @saeedmustapha1334 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      😂😂😂

    • @nealwhite5602
      @nealwhite5602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      they already are
      .

    • @rdecarolis1
      @rdecarolis1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So Lehman didn't take a loss?
      Bear Stearns?

    • @nealwhite5602
      @nealwhite5602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      We just gave $400 billion dollars to the banks , and that goes above fdic , the banks are not taking a loss
      .

  • @conradkostelecky7935
    @conradkostelecky7935 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    The actual problem started in 1913 when the central bank system was started. Fractional banking and a system built on debt in an ever increasing spiral meant to collapse in time.

    • @jakestarr4718
      @jakestarr4718 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ehh any monetary trade system is destined to fail when 1 person can reach a state of controlling almost half of the currency supply. shrugs, it still works and you just have to be clever. there will always be winners and losers.

    • @paulbo9033
      @paulbo9033 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, that system worked fine for a long time, decades. The problem started when Regan financialised the economy, that's when it all started getting totally out of hand.

    • @jakestarr4718
      @jakestarr4718 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@paulbo9033 it was already rigged prior to that, the moguls that put the federal mint in place had it set up for themselves. What Regan did was lobby in the benefit of someone that paid him off well.

    • @chronicpainwarrior
      @chronicpainwarrior หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jakestarr4718 we the people have been conditioned to be the 'loser' in our current state of financial tyranny which works perfectly for the Banksters.

    • @jakestarr4718
      @jakestarr4718 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chronicpainwarrior the only losers are the ones that don't understand what is taxed and why. There are many forms of currency one can trade with, just legal tender from the mints is taxed. If you accept money, you accept taxes. For instance i can buy diamonds, cut them and gain equity then exchange them for other minerals at an exchange with absolutely zero taxes. Why do you think they invest so much money into films where if you have these alternative currencies they'll be stolen and the only safe place is money in banks that is taxed lololololololol. I think you might have missed some important information in this reality we live, probably because you only want money and not equitable currency. Don't hate the game, you too can be a bankster

  • @Sky1
    @Sky1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +483

    Look I can summarize it in one statement. The government is out of money and they're gonna take yours. How's that? How do I do?

    • @scotts1356
      @scotts1356 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      BINGO!

    • @placebojesus5652
      @placebojesus5652 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really shitty. That’s exactly the conclusion they wish for you to come to. Think this through more. Yours is a very short-sighted pseudo/quasi-intellectual way of looking at it. I very much get why you see it that way, and it’s definitely *not* idiocy, but it is definitely an overly short-sighted, simplistic, indeed sophomoric take which is to say the take of a sophisticated moron.

    • @coolco1619
      @coolco1619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      From tax and more tax! That's how.

    • @livinthedream4479
      @livinthedream4479 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      You’re right on that’s why there probably won’t be a big crash. They won’t let the big guys fail

    • @NikiLivi5
      @NikiLivi5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@livinthedream4479 They don’t have the money to bail anyone out. After the banking crash the economy will crash then we will have to fight for our lives because the illegals are going to try to take us over. Prepare or you won’t make it.

  • @paulpellicano8047
    @paulpellicano8047 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +244

    Looks like a matress is more secure than a bank vault these days.

    • @fadyzalzal870
      @fadyzalzal870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Paper money will soon replace bitcoin 😎

    • @bernardmueller5676
      @bernardmueller5676 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      That is exactly why they will ban real money and switch to a digital currency. Mark my words.

    • @rogergeyer9851
      @rogergeyer9851 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So you just IGNORE the "no depositors will lose money" part. For those under the FDIC limit, of course.
      Stop whining. Stop spreading useless FUD.
      Your mattress won't pay your 5ish percent interest, BTW.

    • @retipserjayzoom
      @retipserjayzoom 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They will pull the mattress under you if need be

    • @richardlecomte4874
      @richardlecomte4874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's why the ate pushing digital currency

  • @TheophyllineAnnotations
    @TheophyllineAnnotations 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +258

    Hit 200k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k in last month 2024,

    • @VeronicaERioElisabetta
      @VeronicaERioElisabetta 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow that's huge, how do you make that
      much monthly!

    • @DanielMaori
      @DanielMaori 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Honestly speaking.... I will continue to trade / and stick to Sonia/ daily analysis and guides as long as it works well for me.

    • @VeronicaERioElisabetta
      @VeronicaERioElisabetta 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ms. sonia christen was my hope during the "bear summer" last year. I did so many mistakes but at the same time learnt so much from it, and of course from christen

    • @TheophyllineAnnotations
      @TheophyllineAnnotations 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Woah for real? I'm super excited. Sonia christen strategy has normalized winning trades for me also. and it's a huge milestone for me looking back to how it all started

    • @TarekJoe-sc3gd
      @TarekJoe-sc3gd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first time we had tried, we invested $1000 and after a week we received $7,400. That really helped us a lot to pay our mortgage

  • @user-gv8of3co8x
    @user-gv8of3co8x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Inflation is not about an interest rate, but the uncontrolled printing of money
    ;

  • @therealzahyra
    @therealzahyra 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The mental gymnastics we humans do to justify made up ones and zeroes representing the social construct that is "money" is IN-SANE.

  • @douglaschester2097
    @douglaschester2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    “Big investors start small” - Warren Buffett

    • @douglaschester2097
      @douglaschester2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Making money is action, saving money is behavior and Growing money is knowIedge.

    • @douglaschester2097
      @douglaschester2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I am fortunate I made productive decisions that changed my life forever (accumuIated over a MiI) through my finance-mentor. I'm a single parent, bought my house in January and hoping to retire at 54 by next year.

    • @douglaschester2097
      @douglaschester2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sear ch the name, lf you care.

    • @douglaschester2097
      @douglaschester2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *Rebecca Martin Watson*

    • @AmeliaLiam01
      @AmeliaLiam01 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      l’m amazed to partake on this, lt has rekindled the fire to my goals.

  • @debonairbeast1010
    @debonairbeast1010 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Not all is factually correct in this video. Banks do not make most money by using deposits to create loans. The biggest source of money for banks comes from fractional reserve system. Banks are required to keep a small % of money they „borrow” from depositors and then borrow that money in close to perpetuity. Google the term and you will understand. The amounts mentioned regarding the upcoming maturity of the commercial real estate loans are big (2.2 trillion) for an average person, but banking system is so complicated that we simply don’t know what the spillover effect to other parts of not just banking sector but also real economy will be. It’s 2008 on steroids bc instead of allowing the banks to pay for their risky business, the government bailed them out with, you guessed it, your money. They will do it again without a doubt. Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.

    • @judyhall5624
      @judyhall5624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trouble is big business is in Singapore 🇸🇬 try getting it back..😂😅

    • @tallguy6055
      @tallguy6055 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's a bad conclusion and they distorted what Warren Buffet actually stated. Buffet stated we will be OK and this is normal business. The video bent that to say this is a major looming crisis and it really is not. Fed has already boosted capital reserves to cover for losses in commercial real estate. So in my view at it's worst this will be a slow burn not an absolute crisis.

    • @matthewhawks9731
      @matthewhawks9731 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is just typical "scare line" video trying to get clicks while misinforming the public. Some banks will definitely take a much harder hit than other, but the overall banking system has remained resilient. Also just FYI, as of March 2020 banks no longer have a reserve requirement.

    • @jakestarr4718
      @jakestarr4718 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tallguy6055 yeah but i recall warren reading the infrastructure bill chatting on forbes back at the end of 2008. its normal business alright, but its a different game lol. they're setting it up to crash the usd forever for a continental currency with canada and mexico. prices in mexico are getting close to ours in the usa now, canada is ahead with hyper inflation already, we're all right behind them! i bet warren moves on buying up shipping freighters soon... those brand new government paid for railways made him over 60 billion in equity. he soaks up the freighters before they switch to hydrogen funding packages he'll quadruple his net worth.

    • @tallguy6055
      @tallguy6055 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jakestarr4718 Happy I don't live in that reality. Your never going to see a common currency or common market in North America in your lifetime. No need for it if both Mexico and Canada use the dollar as their reserve currency and have no intention of changing. Not sure where on earth you got the idea BNSF was government paid for. It's been privately run since construction and a good chunk of the mileage was not even land grant. He has no interest in freighters and hydrogen power is not feasible economically with railroad or large scale Marine applications........been tried and way too expensive. Germany tried hydrogen power for passenger trains and just recently gave up on it due to the expense. Not really working out for rail applications and a CPKC hydrogen powered test loco cost $12 million which is approx 3-4 times what a regular diesel costs.......not sustainable financially on a larger scale.

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In the world of finance, where fortunes sway,
    Warren Buffett speaks, with wisdom's ray.
    "A storm is brewing," his words resound,
    In the banking industry, where challenges abound.
    With keen insight, he peers ahead,
    To the stormy seas, where fears are fed.
    For in the currents of economic tide,
    Lie the secrets of success and pride.
    In the banking halls, where money flows,
    Buffett sees the signs, of highs and lows.
    Regulation shifts, and technology's rise,
    A storm gathers strength, beneath the skies.
    Yet amidst the turmoil, Buffett stands tall,
    With a steady hand, he faces it all.
    For in the eye of the storm, where chaos reigns,
    Lie the opportunities, for those with gains.
    So let us heed his words, with care,
    As we navigate the financial fare.
    For in Buffett's wisdom, we may find,
    The path to success, in the stormy grind.

  • @michau_12
    @michau_12 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If bank shut down, then you will lose your money and stocks, it happened before In 2008-2009 in my country (because of USA), many lost their jobs at the same time, business, factories and companies closed down etc.
    So it will not just hit the bank, but every one in contact with the bank.

    • @Alex-zi9wl
      @Alex-zi9wl 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Most brokerages are insured. Robinhood is FDIC insured up to $2.5 million. Every bank is FDIC insured up$250k. By law, the FDIC has to pay you back

  • @humanparaquat69
    @humanparaquat69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    When you use a source like this cnbc clip of warren buffet, could you please give the date when the interview took place? It will help a lot with putting things in perspective. Great video though once again

    • @swiftcoder6773
      @swiftcoder6773 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The video was posted on 4/12/23 on CNBC channel: th-cam.com/video/zTuOMVu9Kow/w-d-xo.html

    • @logingoogly
      @logingoogly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      2 months have passed

    • @barbeldrossler8819
      @barbeldrossler8819 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅

    • @humanparaquat69
      @humanparaquat69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@swiftcoder6773 Thanks friend

    • @qw5040
      @qw5040 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@logingooglyThat's April 12, 2023 not 4 December, 2023...so 10 months...they're discussing bank issues because of the regional bank failures that happened in March

  • @RS-xh8rq
    @RS-xh8rq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Our family had a business with 650 people. We decided to sell in 2023 as our interest cost went from $3m to $8m. Now we collect interest. Interest was eating our profits.

  • @brandonedwards4398
    @brandonedwards4398 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I think the saver, Tim, would say you shouldn't have to borrow money to go out on a date. The relationship would be off to a better start if you cooked her a meal yourself. Don't want to set up the expectation that you're an ATM machine.

  • @carltirocchi8697
    @carltirocchi8697 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    It sounds like a plan by financial concerns, to grab foreclosed real estate at fire sale rates. Is this a reassignment of wealth and assets to the extremely wealthy investment groups?

    • @kyleg9693
      @kyleg9693 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Already happening in socal. Rent is 30-50% of mortgage cost. Airbnb Is dead

    • @johnf6267
      @johnf6267 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep.

    • @ByDesign333
      @ByDesign333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Double yep.
      And complete with DEW fires to create cheap prime location land.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're right. Banks love to go in and steal property after they defrauded the customer in the first place. What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @marelinem541
      @marelinem541 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's how it played out in the 2008 housing crash.
      People panicked and walked away from houses that they could afford the payments on, because the house was worth less than they owed on it. If they had just kept making those payments (and I know not everyone could do that, but everyone I knew that 'lost' their house made a choice to walk away from a loan payment they could afford).
      Then most paid just as much in rent as they'd been paying for their own home, and now they can't afford the same house they walked away from then. If they'd stayed put, they'd be 20 years into their 30 year mortgage with a bunch of equity.

  • @andersonedward787
    @andersonedward787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

    I was advised to diversify my portfolio among several assets such as stocks and bonds since this can protect my portfolio for retirement. I'm seeking to invest $200K across markets but don't know where to start.

    • @PWIviefynn
      @PWIviefynn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the strategies are quite rigorous for the regular-Joe. As a matter of fact, they are mostly successfully carried out by pros who have had a great deal of skillset/knowledge to pull such trades off.

    • @JamesScott433
      @JamesScott433 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Even with the right strategies and appropriate assets, investment returns can differ among investors. Recognizing the vital role of experience in investment success is crucial. Personally, I understood this significance and sought guidance from a market analyst, significantly growing my account to nearly a million. Strategically withdrawing profits just before the market correction, I'm now seizing buying opportunities once again.

    • @yeslahykcim
      @yeslahykcim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      impressive gains! how can I get your advisor please, if you dont mind me asking? I could really use a help as of now

    • @JamesScott433
      @JamesScott433 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Evelyn Alicia Schoenholtz' is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

    • @Jadechurch-ql3do
      @Jadechurch-ql3do 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for this Pointer. It was easy to find your handler, She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her.

  • @Maguirehook
    @Maguirehook หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I usually look up your videos for updates! Our government has no idea how people are suffering these days. I feel for people with disabilities not getting the help they deserve.
    Thank you mrs Amelia jason , imagine investing $12,000 and received $305,500.

    • @Maguirehook
      @Maguirehook หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you not heard of mrs Amelia jason ?

    • @Maguirehook
      @Maguirehook หลายเดือนก่อน

      She has this skill of making complex crypto concepts easy to understand and is truly commendable.

    • @Starkham
      @Starkham หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm new at this, please how can I reach her
      ??

    • @Maguirehook
      @Maguirehook หลายเดือนก่อน

      *She's on telegrams mostly, using the user name.*

    • @Maguirehook
      @Maguirehook หลายเดือนก่อน

      @AmeliaJason11… that’s it

  • @mattd773
    @mattd773 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    How does one know what banks are more susceptible to this problem. Is that a direct line item available to the public in there income and expense statements ? Would it show much they have is commercial real estate loans.

    • @user-yb9ef8in8p
      @user-yb9ef8in8p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Credit unions are thought to be better than banks, but no one knows for sure.

  • @MooseHS
    @MooseHS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great presentation... So I will be a better investor by not investing in small and mid size banks and other lenders of commercial real estate but what investment opportunities will this create?

  • @roelzylstra
    @roelzylstra 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    When you say "bank's money" ($10 million @14:26) where did the bank get that money? Whose money is it? The investors?
    Also, if the bank has $100 million in deposits, it is able to lend $1 billion due to fractional-reserve banking, right? This is the *_real_* problem.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You're right about "fractional banking. This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD!

    • @Meepoli
      @Meepoli 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DavidBruceAllen1I get what you’re saying, but how’s that happen when someone sells a house they own outright?
      If I “own” a million dollar home but only have 200k principal and sell it to someone for a million with 200k down, I understand what you’re saying, the 200k is traded, and the loans swap.
      If I buy a million dollar home for 200k down, and the bank takes my 200k, who pays the original owner their $1 million in cash?
      Are you saying that this does not happen? Could be the case that all the boomers try to sell their million dollar homes they own outright and then there aren’t enough funds to actually pay them, and what I’m saying hasn’t happened at scale just yet.

    • @davidcain3247
      @davidcain3247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Mr Allen, you’re incorrect. First, it’s borrower not barrower. Second, you’re missing a party in the transaction - the seller who receives money from the lending institution via, most frequently at closing, a cashiers check if any proceeds remain after liens or other costs are deducted and paid to the rightful recipients. So the bank is very much lending real money.
      Third, it is not against the law to rehypothecate depositors money. Fact is, this is an extremely common practice unless the charter in which a financial institution is statutorily restricted or prohibited from doing.
      Source of my knowledge? I’m a bank director on the board of directors.

    • @davidcain3247
      @davidcain3247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@DavidBruceAllen1You’re terribly ill informed.

    • @colombard140
      @colombard140 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ❤❤❤❤ Banks in fact create money out of thin air through the process of SRR or Statutory Reserve Requirement.
      For instance, if the central bank sets the SRR at 7%, and you deposit $1,000 in the bank, the bank need to keep back 7% of the $1,000 and can only lend out $930 to borrower A.
      Since A owes the bank $930, the bank claims that it still has an asset of $930 and so it can still lend out 93% of $930 i.e $864 to B...and the process continues..
      As the SRR is 7%, the bank can lend out a total of 14 times the money deposited i.e. for every $1,000 deposit, the bank is allowed to lend out a total of $14,000. The $13,000 is created out of thin air! To calculate the SRR, it is just the inverse of the percentage in digital form i.e. 7% is .07 and the inverse of .07 is 14.
      Nowadays a the SRR in most countries is about 3%. So the banks can lend out 1/.03 times or 33X the amount of money a depositer put into the bank...if you deposit $1 million into your bank, it can create $32 million out of thin air and lend it out to its clients ! 😂😂😂

  • @funjuan3803
    @funjuan3803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is caused by Jeff. The date has a crush on him. Bezos has literally closed our local shops and malls and the restaurants within them. Amazon is to blame.

    • @bblegacy
      @bblegacy 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But it is ultimately the consumers that have made Amazon what it is. The consumers got their bargain basement prices at Amazon check-out at the expense of their local shops and malls. It wasn't Amazon who put them out of business. It was their own customers who stopped patronizing brick-and-mortar businesses in favor of getting next day delivery.... at rock bottom prices.

  • @anthonym_
    @anthonym_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great video. Illustrations are helpful. Thank you.

  • @rkgaston123
    @rkgaston123 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is a good basic primer on how the economy works - the FED, commercial banks, regional banks, and all the way down the chain to the consumers. Bravo!

  • @icutoo2699
    @icutoo2699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Excellent update and video. Some managers are overly aggressive at creating profits where they use other peoples money and when things go bad in business other people are stuck with the losses. I would expect banks to know better about these schemes but the banks use the same tactics to accept these loans and pass on their losses to others. Like a game of hot potato where the government and eventually the worker/employee are stuck with the higher taxes. A good example of risk aversion. Take the profit and pass on the risk to someone else.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @marelinem541
      @marelinem541 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DavidBruceAllen1
      You are doing no one any favors by telling people that they can keep the house, car, etc., but don't have to repay the loan. Pure BS!
      In any transaction like you described, there will be a clause stating that the bank can sell your 'loan.' The lending institution will also reveal what percentage of the loans made they sell. There is no fraud involved.

  • @fadyzalzal870
    @fadyzalzal870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Great explanation. I wish I had such a good teacher at university.

    • @scotts1356
      @scotts1356 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No kidding!

    • @josephyarbrough9316
      @josephyarbrough9316 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's a robot. AI generated But, you knew that

    • @janpolo799
      @janpolo799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch out NY just made getting a real estate loan a crime with the Trump derangement ruling 🤣

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @Solittletimetoomany
    @Solittletimetoomany 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Another issue I didn’t hear her mention, when rates go up, some financial institutions can pay higher rates of interest. If they don’t, some customers will move their funds to financial institutions that do further hurting banks that could not afford to offer higher rates.

  • @jellybean6778
    @jellybean6778 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    As usual, an excellent explanation.

  • @Phantastikal
    @Phantastikal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great video! The USA running near 0% interest rates is a huge mistake but done to prop up a weak GDP and economy. Also the national debt at $33 trillion, does not allow them to keep it higher than near zero. We are doomed.

    • @judyhall5624
      @judyhall5624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't have a budget without debt....it's built into the budget...%ages matter....Despite the 7.5% of GDP adjusted deficit, the debt to GDP ratio rose only 1.6 percentage points from FY 2022 to FY 2023-from 96% to 97.6%

    • @Phantastikal
      @Phantastikal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The debt to GDP ratio is now about 127% which has never happened in the history of the USA. We are doomed.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @judyhall5624
      @judyhall5624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Despite the 7.5% of GDP adjusted deficit, the debt to GDP ratio rose only 1.6 percentage points from FY 2022 to FY 2023-from 96% to 97.6%

  • @0hub1ot
    @0hub1ot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Taking early notes from Warren as to the importance of sound asset diversification and risk management It can’t be overstated. I’ve been trying to grow my portfolio of $300K for sometime now, I would greatly appreciate any other suggestions.

    • @AlexzanderMckenzie
      @AlexzanderMckenzie 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Each strategy carries its own set of pros and cons and picking the right one depends on your specific financial goals, but in order to execute such effective decisions, it must be through a skilled practitioner.

    • @maxwelljohn1545
      @maxwelljohn1545 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true. Despite having no prior investing knowledge, I started investing before the pandemic and pulled in a profit of approximately $950k that same year. In reality, all I was doing was getting professional advice

    • @0hub1ot
      @0hub1ot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’ve been looking to switch to an advisor for a while now. Any help pointing me to who your advisor is?

    • @maxwelljohn1545
      @maxwelljohn1545 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are a lot of independent advisors you might look into. But i work with Camille Anne Hector and she is excellent. She has a profile online from there you could proceed with her if she satisfies your discretion.

    • @liammason3137
      @liammason3137 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The name Camille Anne Hector is in my heart forever, her commitment to her clients is unmatched. Her strategic planning and attention to detail have played a pivotal role in securing my financial stability. I wholeheartedly recommend her services to anyone seeking a knowledgeable and reliable financial advisor.

  • @cindybissett1673
    @cindybissett1673 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I believe the banks are to blame for this real-estate mess. They lowered the interest rate so low it caused a buying frenzy, hence melt down. They are never blamed and its wrong what they have done.

    • @charleswood3705
      @charleswood3705 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Banks are not to be blamed…..the MBAs and Government.….for bad business decisions and Covid lokedowns.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This lowering and raising of interest rates is a planned cycle the Fed and banks have been using for decades and DECADES to take money out of the pockets of hard working people. What we all need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." (The down payment satisfies the "fractional reserve" banking requirement.) The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @jjk2one
      @jjk2one 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's ;nothing new

  • @user-ml2jl5nu2d
    @user-ml2jl5nu2d 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you ❤❤

  • @nigelboreham7357
    @nigelboreham7357 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thankyou for such a concise explanation. Thanks to for keeping me awake with the atificial leg.

  • @gauriblomeyer1835
    @gauriblomeyer1835 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In Germany all banks are made by agreement brothers. All take care of a brother fallen sick, going into insolvency. Without making big noise the public is informed that the sick brother’s capital and losses have been taken over by the big brothers.
    The same is done by all German insurance companies. No German insurance company can go insolvent. In Switzerland it is the state which covers all losses and brings the fallen bank cost free into another strong bank.
    Why are these safety measures not performed in the USA ?

    • @user-nq8vm2iv9v
      @user-nq8vm2iv9v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's to stop the head guy running the banks and insurance company in your country from purposely running it into the ground and making off with the profits into a Swiss bank account. Do you have accountability/policing built into your system to keep those running each institution honest ?

  • @StellaThomas-tk6wp
    @StellaThomas-tk6wp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Thank you for keeping it real with us. We're all getting hit over the head with these prices, the good thing is being in a position to pay these prices. I feel really bad for those who are not in the position to pay for their basic needs.

    • @CharlesMichael-zp5bg
      @CharlesMichael-zp5bg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Investment has been the easiest means to save and multiply money because money left for saving always ends up used without returns.

  • @hildablanco1591
    @hildablanco1591 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When men worked and women stayed home there was less political greed

    •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Our predecessors knew what they where doing by not allowing women to vote let alone to actually be in the clubhouse

    • @eabryn
      @eabryn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No that was when lobbying was illegal and punishable and market manipulation was considered a crime. Reaganomics made both legal and now corporations are monopolies and the top 1% are bleeding the rest for wealth and power by owning monopolies and/or lobbying and winning tax breaks and off shore advantages. Has nothing to do with men controlling women

    •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eabryn can you back up your claim?

  • @user-fg2lh2kk6l
    @user-fg2lh2kk6l 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i dont invest in stock market but do metal detect find lots of silver

  • @williamsporing1500
    @williamsporing1500 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Food, water and metals of various types are the only thing that’s truly valuable.

    • @_comma_period
      @_comma_period 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      always been. like if you have money to invest go just buy gold, palladium etc.
      things boutta get messy

    • @TheRealestHi
      @TheRealestHi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Food, water, blued steel, and gun powder. If you have those, then all you need is ice.

    • @ravensrun6117
      @ravensrun6117 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      especially if you actually own them free and clear of the shareholder class ! I'm expanding my food forest -

  • @Solittletimetoomany
    @Solittletimetoomany 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Michael should have skipped the date and saved the money or asked the date to pay in which case it wouldn’t have been a very successful date, whatever that is.

    • @kevinford6420
      @kevinford6420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂👍

    • @BeHarryOnSlaught
      @BeHarryOnSlaught 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Absolutely ! Michael should have dated his hand and saved the world from financial crisis.

    • @gordonbecker5055
      @gordonbecker5055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BeHarryOnSlaught😆😂😉

  • @MayhemProspecting
    @MayhemProspecting 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All depends on where you live. I’m in a state with zero state income tax, lower prices on goods and services than 75% of the US, and a booming market for housing due to many fleeing their insanely evil states!

  • @markeastman1503
    @markeastman1503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you are already at the bottom you don't have far to fall but the people who are at the top will have the furthest to fall

  • @stevedjurasek7396
    @stevedjurasek7396 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you for the simple explanation how money lending works. I was a Democrat, my whole life. And I had no clue on how money works in banks. I thought it was magically appears every morning. And we never have to worry about paying it back. I guess being a Democrat. You see things differently

    • @mel3004
      @mel3004 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What we all need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." (The down payment satisfies the "fractional reserve" banking requirement.) The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @jimshoe402
    @jimshoe402 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Banks where loaning out money at 5% and paying u 1% = 400% Profit.Get It $$$$$

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @vapor4
      @vapor4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@DavidBruceAllen1*borrower

  • @Hanna5859
    @Hanna5859 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    13:43 This example assumes the property owner does not pay down the mortgage with the profit each year. Lowered mortgage means it gets paid off a lot sooner. The example also assumes renters face no rent increases in 15 years, which is unrealistic.

    • @DonquijoteDC
      @DonquijoteDC 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think there are a lot of variables that can’t all be covered. Huge rentals properties have been empty from work at home policies and some companies are staying that way. So a number of there properties are sitting vacant and not making money.

  • @robertburatt5981
    @robertburatt5981 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another restaurant! Or another supermarket with huge parking lots! Or another convenience store or storage facility! Or another group of town houses with high rents and more roads and more cars! Who needs them! The towns and cities are already gutted with such unimaginative businesses. There is such a lack of imagination and such eye sore uglinessness that they are better off not getting ANY loans. The Hell with them--and the banks!

  • @sanchezlopez2020
    @sanchezlopez2020 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    I will be forever grateful to you, you changed my entire life and I will continue to preach on your behalf for the whole world to hear you saved me from huge financial debt with just a small investment, thank you Veronica Hoy.

    • @BirgitAliyev-tys62
      @BirgitAliyev-tys62 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm surprised that you just mentioned Veronica Hoy here. I met her at a conference in 2018 and we have been working together ever since.

    • @HenryP.-ji5eb
      @HenryP.-ji5eb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The very first time we tried, we invested $1400 and after a week, we received $5230. That really helped us a lot to pay up our bills.

    • @Ryanrodriguez770
      @Ryanrodriguez770 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hoy's expertise in customizing investment portfolios based on changing market conditions and personal risk profiles is exceptional. It's not a one-size-fits-all approach, which is crucial in crypto investing.

    • @bigthelma1
      @bigthelma1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You trade with Veronica Hoy too? Wow that woman has been a blessing to me and my family.

    • @BerthaAzubah
      @BerthaAzubah 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm new at this, please how can I reach her?

  • @mariburns8758
    @mariburns8758 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    the obvious question - why would the fed raise rates so aggressively, knowing the impact on real estate loans?

    • @ValorPartner
      @ValorPartner 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Because the FED doesn't care about collateral damage, they exert virtually unlimited authority to dial back inflation, no matter what. Trillions of new dollars in circulation since 2020 has a price and we're all seeing that in our cost of living.

    • @cunning-stunt
      @cunning-stunt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because they want the dollar to dominate the global markets not be inflated to the point where it is worthless.
      Go have a look at the US debt clock.
      See how many millions it ticks over in a minute.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This lowering and raising of interest rates is a planned cycle the Fed and banks have been using for decades and DECADES to take money out of the pockets of hard working people. What we all need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." (The down payment satisfies the "fractional reserve" banking requirement.) The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @SmartInvestingToday
    @SmartInvestingToday 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video thanks👍

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    when is the interview from

  • @nicosmind3
    @nicosmind3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The upward inflection at the end of every sentence is annoying!!

  • @henryterranauta9100
    @henryterranauta9100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    💰💰With more than💰💰4,000 local banks, it’s likely some will face strong headwinds but💰💰💰the spoiler is - all of banks will somehow merge with bigger companies and a happy ending is in sight ❤❤ Meantime I appreciate the explanation of this video !!

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @ckjohn1090
    @ckjohn1090 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In India, international storm whether in banking industry or in housing is always found out to be a storm in a tea cup as every Bank doubly ensures that property worth two rupees is taken in for every rupee loaned unless the loanee is very closer to the Chief Executive of the nation.

  • @GreetTheMind128
    @GreetTheMind128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a great video. So easy to understand the concept.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @JoyceHAnderson-rp5bf
    @JoyceHAnderson-rp5bf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    WOW! I learned so much from this video. Thank you.

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @coolco1619
      @coolco1619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me too and thank you.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @JoyceHAnderson-rp5bf
      @JoyceHAnderson-rp5bf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know who Warren Buffett is and I tend to believe him. I don't know you "Investor Center." What are your credentials that prove that you know more than Warreen Buffett?

  • @harryrestivo3148
    @harryrestivo3148 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative...thankyou!

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @liuliu2583
    @liuliu2583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Long time of high fed rate will definitely kill banking industry, but optimistic ignores all alerts

  • @brianl1341
    @brianl1341 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Michael should hard pass on the date. Worst ROI for men is spending money chasing women. Before you ask who hurt me, the only time I get hurt is when I trip over the bags of money and saved and made by not wasting my time doing so.
    Thank me later.

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It was meant to be a funny story to demonstrate my point haha

    • @GregTGolden
      @GregTGolden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@InvestorCenteryou miscategorized how banking works completely. Banks dont just work through financial intermediation, they also create the money that they lend out. In your hypothetical scenario, it would be as if he borrowed 10 dollars from his parents piggy bank, but then also printed off 100 dollars from his inkjet printer.
      In fact, depositors only function as a reserve for the bank. The majority of money is created through lending (the bank lends you the money, then deposits it into your account or by making a payment on your behalf through a purchase).
      Financial intermediation (the lending of deposits to creditworthy borrowers) is probably the smallest aspect of banking in modern times.

  • @felipeneto4203
    @felipeneto4203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I love the grounded reality of this channel!!!
    *Retirement took a toll on my finances, but with my involvement in the digital market, $15,000 weekly returns has been life changing. AWESOME GOD* ..

    • @codecreateurroku6764
      @codecreateurroku6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well I engage in nice side hustles like inves'ting, and the good thing is I do it with one one of the best(Ricky Wen), he's really good!

    • @RalphBischoff
      @RalphBischoff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did someone just mention Mr Ricky!? Damn! You just made my day; what a coincidence.. I've worked with him for over 2years and I can tell how good he is

    • @tulapradhan6882
      @tulapradhan6882 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No doubts, this Ricky Wen must be an icon; how good is he and how safe is "profit making" with him.?

    • @vilasaojose6703
      @vilasaojose6703 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *with over 10 years of tra ding experience, Mr Ricky has gained herself a good reputation by helping a lot of persons build their finances' through inves'tments.* 🇱🇷

    • @Itsaraveeef
      @Itsaraveeef 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's interesting, any way to connect with him? I have to get started.

  • @davepaul8975
    @davepaul8975 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank You for your wonderful explanation. Where were you when I was a young lad in school?
    PS: If you were actually doing the drawing, I am very impressed.

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome! PS: I use a software for the drawing. Don't tell anyone :)

  • @jhaychylla
    @jhaychylla 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Newly subscribed; this clarifies things for me.

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Glad it was helpful! Welcome to the community

    • @jhaychylla
      @jhaychylla 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@InvestorCenter Thank you for all you do.

  • @dennisniemier3024
    @dennisniemier3024 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great information here, Thanks! FJB 💕😺😺

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I totally agree about FJB! What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @maryanncrody4867
    @maryanncrody4867 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The ultra rich always get bailed out and then they want to take away my social security

  • @nononsenseBennett
    @nononsenseBennett 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This should be required viewing by anyone thinking of taking a loan. Unfortunately, most people are too dense to understand it all and/or too arrogant and think they know what's good for their personal finances. Financial education is so lacking (maybe that's on purpose?)

  • @fabuliciousrabbit7290
    @fabuliciousrabbit7290 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Don’t people in the USA have to take out mortgage insurance for the banks protection if they default on payments on the loans? In Australia we have to pay for mortgage insurance if we borrow over a certain amount.

    • @vden02
      @vden02 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same here. After a period of time or if the equity in the house rises beyond the 20% value then the owner can restructure and have it removed. Home prices have went through the roof in the US.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mortgage insurance is just another fraudulent way for the banks to get more money out of people. What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @Ryan_L
    @Ryan_L 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    How many is a “few”? And who are those banks so I may short them?

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Only time will tell

    • @anirudhhattangadi3534
      @anirudhhattangadi3534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Am i like ​ Ramesh uncle?@@InvestorCenter

  • @weiwei36362
    @weiwei36362 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you for doing this

  • @davidrosenau3136
    @davidrosenau3136 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My great grandpa put his meager wages in a tin can and burried it in the yard. During the depression, he had money from the tin can to buy enough food to get by. His employer didnt lay off anyone,...they cut hours so all employees worked 2 days/wk.

  • @SVC-hz6dq
    @SVC-hz6dq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Couldn’t be better explained. Thank you very much.

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I appreciate the kind words. Thank you very much for watching and supporting ❤️

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This lowering and raising of interest rates is a planned cycle the Fed and banks have been using for decades and DECADES to take money out of the pockets of hard working people. What we all need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." (The down payment satisfies the "fractional reserve" banking requirement.) The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @magrietguthrie8661
    @magrietguthrie8661 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    South Africa is protected by God, we don't need Evil in this country, stay put, thank you

  • @lindacampbell1808
    @lindacampbell1808 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Buffet is one world elite.

  • @PhilipMartin-ig8re
    @PhilipMartin-ig8re 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is a brilliant note for all investors, The most popular investment portfolio strategies include diversification, where you spread investments across different asset classes to manage risk. Another is the growth strategy, focused on capital appreciation through high-risk, high-reward assets. Income-oriented strategies target regular income from dividend stocks or bonds. Finally, there's the value strategy, seeking undervalued assets for potential long-term gains.

    • @BelindaGomez-ul2yn
      @BelindaGomez-ul2yn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's Correct. according to Warren Buffett, dividends are less valuable for growing businesses and more suitable for established ones. Investing in companies that offer dividends might be seen as parking capital for steady returns, especially for those relying on portfolio income. This approach resembles bond investing, serving as a means of generating consistent earnings.

    • @gahshdsjdndnjd
      @gahshdsjdndnjd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      People get scared of the risk in investment but also forget there are risk also in investing in a car, the honest truth is that investment is the quickest path to financial freedom, the rich stays rich by spending like the poor yet investing! While the poor stays poor by spending like the rich yet not investing. it is good thing to start your Financial freedom this year with good investment idea

    • @gsssbsbjdkfdmjd
      @gsssbsbjdkfdmjd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Regrets are something that humans should not have in life because everything happens due to lack of information and that is why I am posting this here so that whoever sees it does not fall into the trap of regrets in the future. It is more advisable, as an employee, you should cultivate yourself by working and making investments as supporting income, so that you can stand on your own, but no employer will let you know so that you can be under them forever. People like Warren never worked for anyone that long to make him who he is today, instead they invested more in companies to manage their activities and earn a profitable return on investment.

    • @gajsssnsmdndn
      @gajsssnsmdndn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      But honestly for beginners it is advisable you invest through an expert who would serve as a mentor and a guardian to ensure you make profits and increase your accuracy when you make a good portfolio, in that way you get to make money with low risk of losing youhard-earneded money.

    • @DeboraGruba
      @DeboraGruba 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Instead of trying to predict whether or not we’re going into more recession and keep losing your money, a better strategy is simply having a portfolio that’s well prepared for any eventually, that’s how some folks' been averaging 150K every quarter according to Linda Sue Baier.

  • @Al-LasVegas
    @Al-LasVegas 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great information.
    LOVE the graphic illustrations.
    Thanks for sharing. 👏👏👏👏

  • @DanA-nl5uo
    @DanA-nl5uo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That example is way off because of fractional reserves. The bank only has 10% of the money they loan the other 90% is loaned into existence when they write the loan. It is how the vast majority of money is made in the monetary system today.

  • @s.t.e1453
    @s.t.e1453 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SUPERB VIDEO! By far the simplest & most complete explanation in terms of the underlying logic I have ever heard about banks and its relationship with loaners, borrowers, depositers etc Thank you so much for sharing this video!

  • @LlyleHunter
    @LlyleHunter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It sounds like the banks will foreclose on the premium investment firms that bought up the property market and will hold onto the properties until they rebound or recover enough to reasonable values for new buyers to invest in.

  • @brooklynbummer
    @brooklynbummer 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    There are major distortions, in real estate, banking and the stock market that when corrected, will be painful, to the economy. 1929, is easy to be repeated.

  • @bsgarey
    @bsgarey 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That example of borrowing $100 dollars is a straight out living beyond your means....

  • @ric6074
    @ric6074 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spot on.

  • @jonlj77
    @jonlj77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    14:09. The bank isn’t taking much loss. They’ve been indulged in plenty of gains off the “interest” it made of that loan in the prior years. The losses aren’t as bad as they portray them to be.

  • @deanmichael1279
    @deanmichael1279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Commercial real estate has VPs within the banking industry worried. People that I knew from college that went into real estate on the analytics side have already or are in the process of transitioning to new fields. It says a lot.

  • @user-mm4qw2bt8d
    @user-mm4qw2bt8d หลายเดือนก่อน

    No. The money banks lend out is mostly not from their depositors. They sell their loans in the secondary market to entities such as pension funds and lend that money out. They retain the servicing rights.

  • @kims8317
    @kims8317 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Your calculations at 6:49 are a bit off. John did not earn $30. He only earned $10: he earned $20 in interest from Michael and then PAID (not RECEIVED) $10 in interest to Tim. So, John only earned $10 in interest overall.

  • @idahospud6979
    @idahospud6979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    EXCELLENT EXPLANATION!

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you 😊

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

  • @christiansmith-of7dt
    @christiansmith-of7dt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably not

  • @worksmartpaul
    @worksmartpaul 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Money money, money, money money money money.We can't keep doing this, Bob." Thanks to the incredibles, we knew this was coming.

  • @davidjordan4770
    @davidjordan4770 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That we allowed a central bank to come into power again after the depression is beyond me. That the FRB didn't start raising interest slightly earlier sounds planned, that they are raising it this swiftly sounds planned. Smaller banks being gobbled up by the Mega banks and the public feels it is sad. I bet the leaders at the fed don't feel it. Their pay should be tied to the general health of the banking industry and economy.

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What we all need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @jjk2one
      @jjk2one 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DavidBruceAllen1 The noble lie

  • @KG5RK
    @KG5RK 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So how does "BITCOIN" play into this? Are they to be thought of as just "ANOTHER BANK" ?

    • @larscp
      @larscp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, Bitcoin is a pyramid game

  • @user-xd9xy5yl9l
    @user-xd9xy5yl9l 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent explanation.

  • @GurmitBSingh
    @GurmitBSingh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Agree

  • @GeorgeSorrow
    @GeorgeSorrow หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    oh and I thought the problems of Banking shortfalls were to do with the mixing of savings / loans with risky investment trading whereby banks are allowed to gamble the whole amount whilst only have one tenth or even one hundredth of real capital to cover the initial risk hence when their Horse doesn't come home they hit the public for the shortfall.

  • @goldpanner9843
    @goldpanner9843 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If no one has access to (e)funds, are home loan borrowers in default land kicked out if they can't pay?

    • @DavidBruceAllen1
      @DavidBruceAllen1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What you need to know is: This video is pushing a falsehood. Banks do NOT loan out customer's money! They cannot. It is against the law. Banks do NOT loan out any of their own money. They cannot. It is against the law.
      Here's what REALLY happens: A person/customer goes into a bank desiring to barrow money, let's say for a house. The bank requires a down payment from the "barrower." The bank prepares the paperwork with all of the legal jargon that makes it sound like they are "lending" money to the "barrower."
      The "barrower" gives the bank the down payment. (That down payment is the ONLY money being put at risk.) The so called "barrower" signs the "loan documents" and the banks funds the purchase of the house.
      What the bank does NOT tell you is that the bank had zero money at risk in this whole transaction. The "barrower put his down payment money at risk and when he signed the "loan documents" he actually CREATED the money for the so called "loan." YES! Those "loan documents" are then signed just like you would endorse a check without the barrowers knowledge or consent. This proves that the so called "barrower" created the money by signing those documents. Those documents are bundled together with other "loan documents" like it and are sold on the open market like any other tradeable instrument. That document is in fact money.
      The bank had zero money at risk and did NOT "Loan" one red cent to the so called "barrower."
      What I have written above is based on legal facts. The banks are in fact defrauding the public all the time. Fraud vitiates/cancels all contracts. Fraud vitiates/cancels all things. Because of the banking FRAUD all of these FRAUDULENT "loans must be cancelled. The people are entitled to keep the real property, vehicle or whatever. The same goes for credit card debt and student loans. They are all based on FRAUD! Even the terms "barrower" and "lender" are used to deceive the public so they can continue to defraud us.

    • @emetahava
      @emetahava 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      BORROW @@DavidBruceAllen1

  • @rudygarcia8436
    @rudygarcia8436 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They've built more warehouses in the San Antonio area than they'll ever use.

  • @alenblitva7592
    @alenblitva7592 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I suggest we all allocate in Berkshire that will save us all ))

  • @tmtaylor349
    @tmtaylor349 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained, you just left out the bailouts.

  • @seemagrover4228
    @seemagrover4228 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then for what are RBIs central government in countries then??? Losses should be theirs then because they harp about development all the time right????

  • @cptkirkp
    @cptkirkp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Warren - you need to talk to trudeau. He went from 10 million net worth to near a billion very fast-he must be a genius

  • @user-ol7tl1vf5m
    @user-ol7tl1vf5m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can someone remind me how buying company shares in a counterfeiting investment vehicle (infinite printing of shares) using a counterfeiting monetary unit system called fiat (usd) produces real value, real wealth in the world?

  • @donnyrwooten
    @donnyrwooten 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is exactly why I sacrifice food for my family and me and put back a little money at a time untill I get the money I need to buy something I pay in cash full amount that way I don't borrow. It just takes a sacrifice

  • @darkerthanblue9
    @darkerthanblue9 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is great news

  • @dwaynemauk566
    @dwaynemauk566 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jefferson made in a letter to John Taylor in 1816. He wrote, "And I sincerely believe with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; & that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale"