Turok 2 Comparison: Original vs Remastered

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 286

  • @yourcrippledson7027
    @yourcrippledson7027 7 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    Damn, this just goes to show how amazing the original looked for its time on the N64

    • @Sifer2
      @Sifer2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yes it really was stunning. I think it required that expansion pack even.

    • @yourcrippledson7027
      @yourcrippledson7027 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It was definitely an achievement, but the framerate... I've been waiting for the remaster (for a lot longer than since they announced it) so I can get better than 24 fps. I love playing it now. I started this channel just for the sake of uploading my first run through of the game. Now I can't wait to finish it so I can record some hardcore runs.

    • @mmmmmthai
      @mmmmmthai 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      This game really was ahead of its time. Detailed, deep intricate levels, that included the possibility of entrapping yourself into an endless loop if you make a wrong move (did that on Port of Adia once...) The voice acting, weaponry, and imaginative levels really were incredible. Such a shame they completely destroyed the Turok name with the last game.... Evolution got a lot of hate but I liked it. The levels were interesting and I liked the variety.

    • @yourcrippledson7027
      @yourcrippledson7027 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The last game was shameful. The developers didn't understand what makes turok what it is. Not on a basic level. Not on any level. They shat out generic shooter, included dinosaurs, then decided to scam the fans of the originals. Evolution is fun to play through every now and then, but it somehow failed to capture the same magic as the originals.

    • @mmmmmthai
      @mmmmmthai 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Also forgot to mention that the music in the originals was epic. Now if you will excuse me, I have to locate another energy totem and defend it at all costs

  • @thiagovidal6137
    @thiagovidal6137 7 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    For those who don't like the enhancements of the remaster, you can disable them all and having the game looking exactly like the original but with the commodity of higher resolutions, native controller support, achievements etc

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      what would be the point though in buying it and turning them off? xD face it this is just a nostalgia cash in and is absolutely pointless really. Also what higher resolution do you speak of? because their are no higher resolution textures so turning up the res literally does next to nothing xD

    • @gameragodzilla
      @gameragodzilla 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Jax Dagger The original PC port was atrocious so a cleaned up version is nice.

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you caco

    • @miguelrobb5719
      @miguelrobb5719 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Crazy Chris I'm glad that got rid of that ridiculous running animation. It looked mad retarded swinging that gun around

    • @LazyDev27
      @LazyDev27 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you turn off those waypoints that show you where to go?

  • @gib501
    @gib501 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    love how the game was so bloody and now they made it bloodier and the corpses stay forever in the remaster haha I always wanted this !

    • @puereefisch
      @puereefisch 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      hahaha me too

    • @Dragoncurse4
      @Dragoncurse4 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would have been even nicer if NightDive matched the new blood colors with the old blood colors. The new blood is way too bright, it looks like someone splashed paint on the walls. :/

  • @Octolicia
    @Octolicia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Actually there's more than just graphic. In the remaster version, Turok can climb over the limit of a wall. Something he couldn't do in the original.

    • @karlhans6678
      @karlhans6678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So you can climb in the air?

    • @Octolicia
      @Octolicia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@karlhans6678 What I meant was that when you have a fence blocking your way, Turok can climb over that fence. Sounds patheticaly stupid, but on the n64 you couldn't do that.

  • @bud389
    @bud389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    One thing that ticks me off is that in the original, Joseph's height was smaller, and it has nothing to do with the FOV. You can measure your height with certain objects in the game and in the original he was about as tall as the key pedestals, but in the remaster he's significantly taller than them. This overall makes the levels feel smaller and the enemies less intimidating.

    • @ThatZenoGuy
      @ThatZenoGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      God damn you're right. In the remaster he's about as tall as the raptoids, while in the old version they're a good foot or two taller than him. Weird!

  • @AFreakinProblem
    @AFreakinProblem 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The fact that there was nothing done texture wise shows how well Iguana did putting this together. Keep in mind this originally hit the N64 back in 1998 and Windows 95/98 got a half-assed port with a superior multplayer shortly after. The new visuals are limited to menu presentation, HUD, decals, blood spatters, and post processing and that's it. This wasn't the case when the original Turok got remastered, from what I've seen Night Dive actually retextured the whole thing.

  • @bemighty247
    @bemighty247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video. I just started playing the remastered version. I’m loving reliving the game all over

  • @eduardopereira1915
    @eduardopereira1915 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    i don't get it, why is everyone still arguing about the old/new being better? they should be thankful that someone bought the rights and REMASTERED this masterpiece and made it immortal, since not every game has this privillege

  • @icewindofchange
    @icewindofchange 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Loved the remastered, and the mission markers too, its was really frustrating on big levels when you forget something and had to sweep the entire level AGAIN. Now I just have to sweep 2-3 locations, lol

    • @RAZKEN.
      @RAZKEN. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      icewindofchange
      I don't really get why people playing with the mission-markers. Where's the challenge in that? Aren't you playing for the wrong reason then?

    • @MadDoggyca
      @MadDoggyca 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      no playing a game for entertainment is what its suppose to be about..
      pointless travel time for the sake of trying to artifiaclly in cress game time is NOT..
      Pointless travel time is just that....pointless... i'v personally had to talk to more then a hand full of dev to change there game to cut down on pointless travel time cuz nobody likes to waste time walking around for hours on end...

    • @icewindofchange
      @icewindofchange 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see your point, but I hate the necessity to put your nose IN EVERY CORNER just to find a lever that will open a small door to an objective. I came to this game to shoot, but even with markers its not all that simple, you need to be close to it

    • @FrogFrozen
      @FrogFrozen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I myself normally agree with the point of mission markers = hand-holding. However, the levels in Turok 2 are kind of Labyrinthian to the point of nausea at times. Granted, I would have preferred they remix the levels in Turok 2 like they did for Turok 1.
      Turok 1 didn't desperately need some of its levels to be remixed like Turok 2 does. The fucking hive place's level design is somewhat infamous, for example.

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not funny idiot.

  • @hanakun
    @hanakun 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I knew it! This game was at least 5 years ahead of its time :)

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      How? xD it was basically just quake64.....

    • @alexperez4852
      @alexperez4852 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hanakun i used to play that game all the time im getting it soon.

  • @Calypso694
    @Calypso694 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Turok 2 pushed the N64 to its limits and I’m glad it did.

  • @Oni64
    @Oni64 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Opening cutscene is definitely better looking in the original version than the remaster. Other than that, everything else is up for debate. More people might like the saturated bloom image or vice versa. The remaster also has shadows for the enemies.

    • @dannyboi5887
      @dannyboi5887 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The frames are a lot better. More importantly though, you can increase your fov, thank fucking god! That was one of my major gripes with the original. Combined with the weird camera movement, the fov was just headache inducing

  • @vincer9960
    @vincer9960 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    WOW! The objects in the original version have way more detail. Pause it at 2:53 and look at the big stone animal with wings. Why would a "remastered" version, made 20 years later, destroy objects' details and fidelity? If anything, it should have improved details or at least kept them the same. This makes no sense!

  • @RAZKEN.
    @RAZKEN. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Another excellent remaster by Nightdive/Kaiser!
    I love that they implemented motion blur, edgeclimbing and many more small tweaks and details that makes the game more enoyable!
    The only thing I wish they fixed is the original sounds for the raptoids from the N64 versions, which sounds a little bit better.
    EDIT.
    Wow, I think they heard us because they apparently fixed it 2 days ago! Yippie!

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      excellent how... barely anything has changed except for the contrast and added motion blur.... released because they simply thought nostalgia would help it resell....

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      20$ a piece, this really irrates md

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meh

  • @carlosaguayo3449
    @carlosaguayo3449 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They should literally remake the whole damn series

  • @Superunknown190
    @Superunknown190 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That portal effect looks uglier in the remaster. It should look more transparent.

  • @vincer9960
    @vincer9960 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why does everything look like a blurry, low quality mess in the remastered? The textures in the original look way more sharp, detailed, and high resolution - from the characters to objects in the world. Example: pause at 0:37 ...???

    • @fonarte
      @fonarte 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No, it's because the originally is super aliased.
      High frequency aliasing =/= actual detail. Something people seem to mix up a lot. Which is why most Reshade presets are grossly over sharpened.
      PLUS, this video is super compressed. There's no way it represents an accurate comparison down to the pixel level.
      In addition the remaster has Per-object motion blur for enemies. Which blurs them, in addition to the soft bloom.

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      because they didn't fix the ability to render higher resolutions so did NOTHING to the textures but edited the lighing and contrast and added an awful motion blur.

  • @MunkeyChips
    @MunkeyChips 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the multiple levels of Per-Object Motion Blur and the Screen Space Motion Blur. The extreme level object motion blur is absurd, but I think the low setting looks nice.

  • @gmadera7
    @gmadera7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    im usually an originalist but damnnnnn that remastered looks and plays amazing.

  • @LITTLE1994
    @LITTLE1994 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why are they using the PC version instead of the N64 version for the original?
    Anyway, the graphic improvements are cool, especially the gore, but I know the gameplay isn't going to be identical. I stick with the old.

  • @CdrChaos
    @CdrChaos 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why is this being called a remaster? It's just a slightly enhanced port. They just added shadows and set the frame rate to 60.

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      CdrChaos and they ask for 20$

  • @SpiderLuke
    @SpiderLuke 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I can't believe I sold this back in the day to buy cigarettes.

  • @scotm721
    @scotm721 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Remaster is awesome! "Thank you Turok!".

  • @Kharn526
    @Kharn526 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I dont care about visuals with this game too much because the models still look like shit but its a such a great game. I love the remaster for the 60fps, this game ran so fucking terrible on the N64 ,especially with the high res pack.

    • @bud389
      @bud389 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Models looked great for the era, get your troll ass outa here.

    • @briansmith2739
      @briansmith2739 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Kharn STFU. Turok 2 is one of the best First Person Shooters of all times, on par with GoldenEye, Perfect Dark and Quake 2. You're just another internet troll moron.

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stop complaining imbecile.

  • @CasepbX
    @CasepbX 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Haha good old fog machine 64. They did an excellent job on the remaster.

  • @De-M-oN
    @De-M-oN 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The tek arrow explosion being green may be a bad 16bit color rendering by new 32bit graphic cards.
    dgvoodoo 2 converts 16bit color games to 32bit so they're displayed correct again on modern graphic cards.

  • @theinsfrijonds
    @theinsfrijonds 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked that you didn't blow up the brightness (and thus eliminate much of the contrast), though I feel the setting you have it on is a touch too dark for the new one.

  • @doomdoomerson6524
    @doomdoomerson6524 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THIS IS HOW DINOSAURS REALLY WENT EXTINCT

  • @djam7484
    @djam7484 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i cant belive i beat this game on the n64 with that FOV...my god its horrible

  • @Hatecrewdethrol
    @Hatecrewdethrol 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    man just the framerate makes a massive difference

  • @asrulahmad5862
    @asrulahmad5862 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    i wanted this game will be remake not remasterd

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Didn't we all.

  • @SketchTwilight
    @SketchTwilight 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't own or have ever heard of this game but I do know that the remaster looks alot better in many was. The enemy models are better looking, the lighting is better, the render distance is by far way better, the weapons and power ups are enhanced, the blood looks different, The frame rate is by far better, and the sounds are changed. I myself am not getting it but hey if you want it you get it.

  • @--Animal--
    @--Animal-- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice work, very much appreciate the effort.

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kheiran K there is no effort, it's a glorified port for 20$

  • @robertsimpson5761
    @robertsimpson5761 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the remaster has some spots 1:49 that _looked_ better, but the remaster colors are off and textures are blurry, the original was brighter ,, the original wins AFAIAC

  • @mr.boostang2064
    @mr.boostang2064 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the RM version on my Xbox one. Thanks to modern controls and Doom Eternal I was able to beat this game in the hardest of difficulty with not too much of a problem.

  • @SF_XX
    @SF_XX 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know the fog was because of limitations but I actually liked it

  • @mistamontiel00
    @mistamontiel00 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    wtf the intro cutscene!! So game never made shadows, not even a pool but nightdive just makes them and totally functional!? Sounds challenging

  • @rodrigof.r.desouza3587
    @rodrigof.r.desouza3587 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    TBH the graphics in the original are somewhat better. The only thing I actually liked in the remaster are the shadows and the light FX.

    • @AFreakinProblem
      @AFreakinProblem 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Outside of menu, decals, and HUD you can make it look identical to the N64 version or it's terrible 1999 PC port.

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The textures are basically identical... just edited contrast lighting and added blur, boring and horrible for a remaster.

  • @tumado7304
    @tumado7304 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    at least they could have done something like serious sam 1,2 encounters in hd.

  • @Czarewich
    @Czarewich 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    With the added bloom and removed fog, it almost looks like Serious Sam.

  • @vegitoblue2187
    @vegitoblue2187 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how did you hide the secondary ammo from the hud in remastered?

  • @SirSilicon
    @SirSilicon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I loved this game. The remastered version it looks a bit like serious sam 1. And a little bit like the new DOOM

  • @seven203
    @seven203 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be possible another reboot ?

  • @SpaceFox93
    @SpaceFox93 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure I like the changes in the remastered version. Is there a way to switch it back to the original graphics?

    • @badtexture1062
      @badtexture1062 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's a few screenshots of the options on PCGamingWiki if you want to see for yourself. There's a ridiculous number of customization you can do, including turning back on the fog.

  • @AbyssmalAngel
    @AbyssmalAngel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm liking everything.... except way too much Bloom.

  • @Թղժ-ձ4ո
    @Թղժ-ձ4ո 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this game

  • @MrEvodio65
    @MrEvodio65 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the game but it did not work on mo Acer computer and is only 2 years old.

  • @JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701
    @JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will this game come out for Xbox One and WHEN!? Does anyone KNOW!?

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      JAGTHEGEMINI yes but 20$

    • @JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701
      @JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since NOT A SINGLE DAMN PERSON ANSWERED, I WILL ANSWER MYSELF....
      It comes out TOMORROW!!!
      YEAH!!!

  • @karlhans6678
    @karlhans6678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want Rage Wars Remastered with multiplayer!

  • @notturok7841
    @notturok7841 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    you guys are insane. the remaster looks way better in every way other than maybe the very beginning. I personally like the model from the opening for the 64. But other than that the game looks to have flipped in "Lightmap&Vertex".
    it looks like turok model is vertex for the remaster but the rest looks lush and light mapped. Only complaint is the bloom that's it. To bright there also be an option to adjust contrast and vibrance. but that's where sweetfx comes in.
    The guy that has done this and the first turok. this isn't his first re-engineered game. he's done numerous other games all for free as well. Clearly he is talented and nightdive saw this. He even got fucking online to work. so if none of you ever played Turok 2 online from then to now. Think you need to open your eyes and appreciate this beautiful work of art.
    the base speed seems to have been improved and my eyes are falling in love with turok 2 all over again like when I was a child leaving on my n64 all weekend just to beat the first and finally second level. This will probably be the closest game we will get that reminds me of metroid prime and then hopefully system shock.
    I'll leave this here because the bitch inside you is gonna come out.

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Seriously it looks like an extremely lazy remaster with darker contrast and motion blur added.... "Lightmap&Vertex" doesn't even mean anything why did you link them together like that like it actually means something it doesn't xD think u've been playing a bit too much quake and you can try to sound like a developer because honestly this is possibly the laziest remaster in quite some time, not even updated for higher resolution texturing or anything. The base speed hasn't improved with anything other than time... it was built for PC and Console in mind at the time and your computer is simply faster than it was when released so ofcourse the "base speed" seems faster... not even sure why you said "base" once again you are just trying to throw in pointless terms partially relevant to quake that you think make sense that actually don't xD they didn't see talent they saw an excuse to cash in on nostalgia... which they clearly did because you end it by ranting about how much you loved it as a child... that is pretty funny.
      Vertex-based lightmapping..... try that next time atleast that would have made sense from a quake engine point of view, the "flipped in" part before it thought still would have left me laughing... your terminology is hilarious xD

    • @fafnir97
      @fafnir97 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just to add to Jax's comment, of course a douche like Tur'rick would be a Rick & Morty fan. Seriously, that fanbase is full of self-absorbed retards who think they're smart. I've thought a few times about watching the show, but almost every encounter with one of the fans has driven me away.

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No it's barely a remaster, and they ask for 20$ a piece, gtfo

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello system shock is having an actual remaster/remake and it is 10x the amount of effort, and from a smaller team I believe

    • @michaelfan86
      @michaelfan86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TUR'RICK and the bitch inside you hasn’t come out already? Wow you really think your shit don’t stink do you? You have an opinion like everyone else, who fucking cares..

  • @WellBeSerious12
    @WellBeSerious12 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    8 raptors disliked this video.

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anyone with 20/20 vision disliked this...

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      32 dumbass

  • @NomDatBass
    @NomDatBass 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What resolution are you playing the remaster at? Sorry if I'm coming across as rude, but it seems like you're playing the remaster at a significantly lower resolution than the original.

  • @nostalgia64d
    @nostalgia64d 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lo único bueno de jugarlo en PC en aquel entonces era de que no tenía tantos bajones de frame como en la N64

  • @1Muzition1
    @1Muzition1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Too much nostalgia goggles going on in this comments section. Just an FYI: This comparison is between the original PC port and the remastered PC version. The N64 version was NOT used in this video. PC vs the N64 version would be an absolute bloodbath. This game ran like total crap on both systems but the N64 version is unplayable by today's standards

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nah if anything nostalgia helps me see clearly... that compared to the old PC version the remaster looks about... 2% better... added motion blur is horrible though and the contrast on the lighting they decided on makes the textures just look more balanced... that is it....

    • @1Muzition1
      @1Muzition1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was talking about PC vs N64, not original vs remaster.

    • @SF_XX
      @SF_XX 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is the n64 version unplayable?

  • @zerotonine807
    @zerotonine807 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No difference as you cant pimp that engine. Just some shadows and color enhancements.....they did the best job leaving it original.

    • @K4inan
      @K4inan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The animations are ten times smoother tho

  • @LazyDev27
    @LazyDev27 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Better be able to turn off those casual pleb waypoints showin u where everything is. Thats half the game is finding them, especially later on.

  • @Ronnie1992
    @Ronnie1992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it me,or Joshua Fireseed looks a lot like Josh Brolin?

  • @ImaFnT-Rex
    @ImaFnT-Rex 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the remaster shows where hidden things are? wth lol

  • @lordyasha5944
    @lordyasha5944 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the only better thing on the remaster are the textures of the enemies

  • @fabiosilva-bt8tm
    @fabiosilva-bt8tm 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Turok 2 could have a remake with graphics of the new generation and not only remastered the graphics changed little thing could have graphics like battlefield one

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      They could be... they let some lazy devs "mod" and I used that term lightly "mod" turok 2 and released it because it's a bit of extra cash in their pockets... you think they care about a remake? xD

  • @Ostnizdasht206
    @Ostnizdasht206 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd actual would of just preferred the original just with a better framerate.

  • @iamremnant
    @iamremnant 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    but.. the original wasn't HD. are you using an emulator to ramp up the graphics?

    • @GameIntrosFinales
      @GameIntrosFinales  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's the PC port from 1999. I can make another video with the n64 version from 1998 compared to the pc port and the current remaster.

    • @PlumbDrumb
      @PlumbDrumb 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would be great.

  • @wonaldgrump9654
    @wonaldgrump9654 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks okay... but needs the Crash Nsane trilogy treatment instead.

  • @AmnesiaGm1
    @AmnesiaGm1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The shadow of the boobs lol.

  • @MrShadow0717
    @MrShadow0717 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nintendo 64 fue una joya este juego fue y na joya, si no hubieran optado por el camino de Cristal de no sacar juegos sangrientos Nintendo seguiría siendo el rey de consolas

  • @WednesdayMan
    @WednesdayMan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the PC version is just better
    It has a higher Framerate it's easily noticeable how bad the N64 framerate is oh and the PC version has official widescreen meaning no more stretched videos (Looking at those idiots thinking they can stretch the aspect ratio) So that's good oh and your using emulation to give it a better chance, so they look exactly the same not much difference just the PC has better controls

  • @MadDoggyca
    @MadDoggyca 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bloom and Motion blue should NEVER be a in game graphic option.. EVER.. a Defiantly Disabled requirement to full enjoy any title.. Neither should Depth of Field

  • @Jackie_Fhan
    @Jackie_Fhan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    these guys should have did the crash bandicoot game.

  • @anthbobo2783
    @anthbobo2783 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not really a fan of a lot of the added effects especially saturation.

  • @Tailslol
    @Tailslol 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the original is wrong..
    you are using it in d3d mode
    and we know the game was made for 3dfx
    in d3d mode all real time lighting is missing...
    you need to use nglide for the original (or emulate the n64 one)

  • @ashingone8483
    @ashingone8483 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the N64 version vs the Xbox download! The chocking on blood with a lung shot too raptor in not that much pronounced

  • @EdgarIX
    @EdgarIX 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    this both is version pc

  • @prismaticbeetle3194
    @prismaticbeetle3194 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    warp portal...................... activated

  • @fightttttt
    @fightttttt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This engine was impressive it could of made a lower res gta 3 lol

  • @nightventure9247
    @nightventure9247 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am Turok! I am Groot!

  • @unvatorandom2302
    @unvatorandom2302 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y turok all the enemies y boses from all the games from turok plis

  • @arielmartinez2433
    @arielmartinez2433 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    remaster?

  • @doomdoomerson6524
    @doomdoomerson6524 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dino Doom 64

  • @Steve-zc8yn
    @Steve-zc8yn ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb remaster. This is how they should all be done imo - frame rate and refresh rate updated to current standards, minor visual enhancements where sacrifices were made due to tech limitations.

  • @calery5714
    @calery5714 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Has the Remastered Version WASD Controlls? or does it still use the Arrow Keyes?

  • @xaviercp2200
    @xaviercp2200 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    no popping abuse

  • @OTBASH
    @OTBASH 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Motion blur looks like shit.

  • @guitarboyjeff
    @guitarboyjeff 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not much of a difference, just frame rate and some visuals but it still looks dated. I would love either a true remaster or a new one on current gen consoles. The one on PS3 had potential but it was trash because even though it was beautiful, weapon wise and weapon mechanics sucked!! Especially because the game did not use aiming down your sights. I really despised that and could not finish the game. Though like I said it was beautiful and the dinosaurs were normal and not mutated but it was scary!!! Lol!

  • @Darkcabron
    @Darkcabron 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Se ve casi igual que el original, incluso la transparencia del portal al inicio se ve mejor en el Original, la verdad que desepcionante, esperaba algo como el Halo Anniversary

    • @VictorRodriguez-ux8zi
      @VictorRodriguez-ux8zi 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Darkcabron yo tambien esperaba algo mejor, pero bueno supongo que quiza valga la pena solo por jugar a 60 fps, tanto turok 2 de n64 como de pc tenian unas caidas de cuadros horribles que afectaban la experiencia.

  • @EdgarIX
    @EdgarIX 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Los Sonidos no son del N64, =( la muerte de los Dinosaurios son mucho mejores en la version de N64
    The Sounds are not of the N64, = (the death of the Dinosaurs are much better in the version of N64

  • @nicolasdoriabelzarena9431
    @nicolasdoriabelzarena9431 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Turok wind Wacker remake

  • @carwash-ryutamaria
    @carwash-ryutamaria 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    新しくなったな

  • @AAALLDAY07
    @AAALLDAY07 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    eehh its a little bit better, they should've just remake the whole game with better graphics

  • @coldturnipgreens
    @coldturnipgreens 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The bloom is cancer.

  • @nostalgia64d
    @nostalgia64d 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Muy difícil pero buen juego

  • @tintantantin3789
    @tintantantin3789 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Selective Color.

  • @dmudda89
    @dmudda89 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Hahaha am I the only one who thinks the original looks better than the remastered version? xD

    • @normbreakingclown676
      @normbreakingclown676 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah me too although the fog and the this game has better draw distance and most likely better framerate and controls

    • @taniagir1600
      @taniagir1600 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the original looks better. I like fog.

    • @JaxDagger
      @JaxDagger 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      nope you are not

    • @eldfyre-abyss
      @eldfyre-abyss 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      F this, oh hey we'll port the game to new Gen, put barley any work into it and wala die hard fans will just throw us easy money. Please boycott this, do not allow them to get away with this

    • @mulderscully3707
      @mulderscully3707 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are not alone punk.

  • @BeeBumper
    @BeeBumper 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Original was meant to play as stealth and it made the game what it is but that has changed completely. There is NO stealth in turok 2 remaster in fact it is likely to get you killed

  • @justinworkman8735
    @justinworkman8735 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now compare the remastered edition vs turok 2 with Ultra 64 and Ascension mods which replaces 90% of game textures with 2k and 4k models

  • @laoveja5127
    @laoveja5127 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    el original sólo por no tener esas marcas de los objetivos ✌

  • @sibylsaint
    @sibylsaint 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I like the original more, sorry. :/
    I like the fog, I like the funky light, and the teleporter in the intro has terrible edges in the remastered. The shadows are nice. The only thing bad about the original is the framerate, and that's probably only on N64.

    • @SplatterHomicide
      @SplatterHomicide 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      you can disable the extra lighting in the option to make it look like the original. There's a bunch of other options also, like getting rid of those "!" and enable or disable the fog

    • @RetroDeathReviews666
      @RetroDeathReviews666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      bad framerate was also on the pc port, it ran the same on my windows 7 with a gtx 650 as it did with my windows 98.
      also with the remaster you can turn off the bloom and/or turn on the fog if you like it.
      they give you complete freedom on how you want it to look and play, just like they did with dinosaur hunter.

    • @EmmanuelEXEf06
      @EmmanuelEXEf06 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      People dont want to move on the remastered version because a lot have played the MP of the PC version for years ^^'
      Idk what is wrong with the remastered version, like you said, we can change a lot of things with the options :)

    • @RetroDeathReviews666
      @RetroDeathReviews666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      exactly dude.
      The multiplayer is actually much more improved in the remaster one, it has a more quake feel to it.
      Also has split screen, better optimization, and the servers all work (besides the ones that are hosted with the beta patch).

    • @EmmanuelEXEf06
      @EmmanuelEXEf06 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think, without ports or nextgen game (even for DOOM with DOOM2016), the old community is just gonna be forgotten and die later...
      I would want a port for BLOOD and some other retro games, it's always a good thing for new people who want try the games, so the community could be alive in the future for those games :)

  • @lordreyes2725
    @lordreyes2725 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    its the same, just a little briter.
    if ypu cant tell the difference unless is side by side, then is just milking it.

  • @GameslordXY
    @GameslordXY 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The original:
    A man.
    "Remaster":
    A boy.
    😁

    • @eduardopereira1915
      @eduardopereira1915 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      are you trying to be funny? because you've failed miserably...

  • @mmmmmthai
    @mmmmmthai 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sooo... Having been one of my favorite games, I have to say I like and dislike the remaster. I like the lighting and smoothness, BUT the fog in the original really added to the shock and surprise value.