My experience is quite different. I have 27 lenses for my Canon R7, 11 of the these lenses have no IS. All thoses lenses are EF or EF-S mount except the 18-150mm (I never use this) and the oddball 800mm f11 (which I love). manufacturers of those lenses are Canon, Tamron, Sigma, Laowa, Opteka, Promaster. I use 3 different adapters to mount those EF / EF-S lenses ... the standard Canon adapter, a Meike adapter withfilter slot (fantastic for my bulbous wide angle lenses or my 300-800mm f5.6 and 300mm catadioptric (which has no filter threads), and a Metabones SpeedBooster adapter (only can be used effectively on Full Frame EF lenses, but can be used on EF-S lenses if you don't mind cropping the image significantly). All 3 adapters allow the stabilization on my stabilized lenses to work as good as they can, and stabilization is definitely improved over using IBIS alone.
This is what I was looking for before making a decision for upgrading from 80D. I want to know how are the results of still photos at lower shutter speeds using EF lenses in low light situations.
My experience is that on IS lenses, it is excellent. My advice though is to get a Speedbooster for your FF lenses. This allows 1 full ev increase in shutter speed (shoot at 1/125 sec instead of 60 sec) which helps overall image quality by helping to freeze camera shake AND subject movement. Plus on a premium SpeedBooster the image quslity is slightly improved by the "optical compression".
Hi, I was trying to answer if all general ef efs lens are better than Rf lens for my R7. I understand the rf are made for R7 but after many videos people talk about how they work. My question is first what is the difference between other than the the mount. I do have the ef to rf mount. Do I want to buy lens but the best for my R7. Hope this makes sense.
I think the Ibis was pretty good with all three lenses and I have all those three lenses. If it helps me even by 50% I’ll be happy. Will you please compare the ibis on the R7 with the one on the new G9 ii? Same focal distances and maybe up to 200+ mm?
You can turn it on and off from the first menu, page number 6...I guess the option comes out only when a non stabilized lens is connected or when there's no lens on the camera. From there you can select also the focal length that you want IBIS to stabilize. Also from the menu on the lcd screen you can turn IBIS (and electronic stabilization) on and off.
Hello Dan, which adapter do you use for this test? How does the viltrox ef-r3 0.71x speed booster performs regarding to stabilization, vs. canon normal ef-rf adapter, especially for the R7+EF135 f2.0? Thanks for your previous helpful video on R7+speed booster+EF135 f2.0. I once found the wonderful EF 135 f2.0 wasn’t on viltrox’ s own compatible lens list of the ef-r3, and now the ef-r3 isn’t displayed on their website anymore.
For this test I used the regular Canon adapter. The Viltrox speed booster performs very well...just like the Canon adapter...I will try to make another video like this one but using the speed booster. Canon doesn't allow other companies to produce lenses and other things that use the R focus technology and that's why Viltrox stopped selling R mount lenses (they had some pretty good RF 85mm F/1.8) and that's why the ef-R3 doesn't appear in their website anymore. It's a shame but...maybe soon Canon will allow them to start selling them again. Thank you for watching!
I found the IBIS of the R7 dissipointing too. Comparing the R7 with 18-150 mm lens to the Canon RP and 24-240 superzoom. I found even though the R7 had IBIS (RP does not). The RP and superzoom combo produced sharper photos at a lot slower shutter speeds.
Hi Dan, That nifty fifty and the 135 looked good enough with stable on' that 50mm looked awesome though I must admit and I loved the ferrari model car for testing on, Canon have always seemed to have slight issues however with stabalization along with some other makers, I use the lumix s5 and I don't think the stable is all that good' it's decent but not great but I was slightly disappointed with it... Anyway I really enjoyed this video content... God Bless Dan to you and the family and best 73s from the u. k😊
Have you double checked if the IBIS does probably work in 50mm mode on the 135mm? Normally this problem only occurs with manual lenses without contacts and when you have to change the focal length manually, but i had already very bad IBIS issues with Sigma autofocus lenses, i needed to disconnect the electronic contacts and set the focal length manually to make IBIS work as intended
@@DanFrullani What, that is possible on all of your Autofocus lenses?! When a autofocus lens which reports its focal length is attached this options should be greyed out, or are all of your AF lenses broken electronically? I mainly meant the issue when you dont use electronic contacts and the IBIS ALWAYS (!!!) starts at 50mm setting, no matter what setting you have set manually before. In this case you literally have to set it to 50 back, leave the menu to live view and set it to the correct focal length again so IBIS works correctly, a pretty annoying bug with manual focus lenses and partially IBIS is even affected by 3rd party Autofocus lenses (10-20 3.5 and 5.6 sigma, 105 2.8)
@@DanFrullani What i also noticed - IBIS is definately "more lazy" on 3rd party/no electronic contacts lenses, not sure if its an artificial and intentional limitation by Canon to force users to at least Canon glass, better even RF glass or really a unintenional problem. At least with my Sigma lenses i wish my R7 WOULD NOT (!!!) have IBIS. Probably its too unnecessary for you to also get such a dirty cheap wide angle Sigma, but its hilarious to see how problematic it is on the R7s IBIS - Even stable on a tripod or a table the IBIS WOBBLES (!!!) around heavily with absolutely unhealthy sounds coming from the R7 body/IBIS moving, i probably make some day a video about this issue. You either have to disable IBIS or disconnect the contacts and set it up as if it was a manual focus lens (with the R7s own Problem sticking to 50mm at startup, ALWAYS!)
Were all of these non-IS lenses? There is no option to turn IBIS on with a lens that has its own IS. It only shows up on lenses that don't have built-in IS.
Very helpful video, an awesome test definitely i go for the R7
What about EFS LENSES? Thanks
My experience is quite different. I have 27 lenses for my Canon R7, 11 of the these lenses have no IS. All thoses lenses are EF or EF-S mount except the 18-150mm (I never use this) and the oddball 800mm f11 (which I love). manufacturers of those lenses are Canon, Tamron, Sigma, Laowa, Opteka, Promaster. I use 3 different adapters to mount those EF / EF-S lenses ... the standard Canon adapter, a Meike adapter withfilter slot (fantastic for my bulbous wide angle lenses or my 300-800mm f5.6 and 300mm catadioptric (which has no filter threads), and a Metabones SpeedBooster adapter (only can be used effectively on Full Frame EF lenses, but can be used on EF-S lenses if you don't mind cropping the image significantly). All 3 adapters allow the stabilization on my stabilized lenses to work as good as they can, and stabilization is definitely improved over using IBIS alone.
Hi big doctor the power is with you
This is what I was looking for before making a decision for upgrading from 80D. I want to know how are the results of still photos at lower shutter speeds using EF lenses in low light situations.
My experience is that on IS lenses, it is excellent. My advice though is to get a Speedbooster for your FF lenses. This allows 1 full ev increase in shutter speed (shoot at 1/125 sec instead of 60 sec) which helps overall image quality by helping to freeze camera shake AND subject movement. Plus on a premium SpeedBooster the image quslity is slightly improved by the "optical compression".
Thank you for making this video. I do not want to upgrade my EF lenses yet, and need a new body.
Any experience with a tele 400 or 500 and only IBIS? Any reviews that you can recommend ?
Hi, I was trying to answer if all general ef efs lens are better than Rf lens for my R7. I understand the rf are made for R7 but after many videos people talk about how they work. My question is first what is the difference between other than the the mount. I do have the ef to rf mount. Do I want to buy lens but the best for my R7. Hope this makes sense.
Should I have the ibis and the is on the lens turned on ? For action shots
I think the Ibis was pretty good with all three lenses and I have all those three lenses. If it helps me even by 50% I’ll be happy. Will you please compare the ibis on the R7 with the one on the new G9 ii? Same focal distances and maybe up to 200+ mm?
great video! this the answer ive been looking for!
can you try the stabilization test with speedbooster + nonIS EF lenses please?
Does it work well on stills?
How did you turn on/off IBIS? I thought you can't control it if your lens does not have IS switch and it's ON all the time.
You can turn it on and off from the first menu, page number 6...I guess the option comes out only when a non stabilized lens is connected or when there's no lens on the camera. From there you can select also the focal length that you want IBIS to stabilize. Also from the menu on the lcd screen you can turn IBIS (and electronic stabilization) on and off.
Hello Dan, which adapter do you use for this test? How does the viltrox ef-r3 0.71x speed booster performs regarding to stabilization, vs. canon normal ef-rf adapter, especially for the R7+EF135 f2.0? Thanks for your previous helpful video on R7+speed booster+EF135 f2.0. I once found the wonderful EF 135 f2.0 wasn’t on viltrox’ s own compatible lens list of the ef-r3, and now the ef-r3 isn’t displayed on their website anymore.
For this test I used the regular Canon adapter. The Viltrox speed booster performs very well...just like the Canon adapter...I will try to make another video like this one but using the speed booster. Canon doesn't allow other companies to produce lenses and other things that use the R focus technology and that's why Viltrox stopped selling R mount lenses (they had some pretty good RF 85mm F/1.8) and that's why the ef-R3 doesn't appear in their website anymore. It's a shame but...maybe soon Canon will allow them to start selling them again. Thank you for watching!
I found the IBIS of the R7 dissipointing too. Comparing the R7 with 18-150 mm lens to the Canon RP and 24-240 superzoom. I found even though the R7 had IBIS (RP does not). The RP and superzoom combo produced sharper photos at a lot slower shutter speeds.
Obturador mecânico 👎
Hi Dan, That nifty fifty and the 135 looked good enough with stable on' that 50mm looked awesome though I must admit and I loved the ferrari model car for testing on, Canon have always seemed to have slight issues however with stabalization along with some other makers, I use the lumix s5 and I don't think the stable is all that good' it's decent but not great but I was slightly disappointed with it... Anyway I really enjoyed this video content... God Bless Dan to you and the family and best 73s from the u. k😊
It works with my sigma 18 - 35
Have you double checked if the IBIS does probably work in 50mm mode on the 135mm?
Normally this problem only occurs with manual lenses without contacts and when you have to change the focal length manually, but i had already very bad IBIS issues with Sigma autofocus lenses, i needed to disconnect the electronic contacts and set the focal length manually to make IBIS work as intended
@@DanFrullani What, that is possible on all of your Autofocus lenses?!
When a autofocus lens which reports its focal length is attached this options should be greyed out, or are all of your AF lenses broken electronically?
I mainly meant the issue when you dont use electronic contacts and the IBIS ALWAYS (!!!) starts at 50mm setting, no matter what setting you have set manually before.
In this case you literally have to set it to 50 back, leave the menu to live view and set it to the correct focal length again so IBIS works correctly, a pretty annoying bug with manual focus lenses and partially IBIS is even affected by 3rd party Autofocus lenses (10-20 3.5 and 5.6 sigma, 105 2.8)
@@DanFrullani What i also noticed - IBIS is definately "more lazy" on 3rd party/no electronic contacts lenses, not sure if its an artificial and intentional limitation by Canon to force users to at least Canon glass, better even RF glass or really a unintenional problem.
At least with my Sigma lenses i wish my R7 WOULD NOT (!!!) have IBIS.
Probably its too unnecessary for you to also get such a dirty cheap wide angle Sigma, but its hilarious to see how problematic it is on the R7s IBIS - Even stable on a tripod or a table the IBIS WOBBLES (!!!) around heavily with absolutely unhealthy sounds coming from the R7 body/IBIS moving, i probably make some day a video about this issue.
You either have to disable IBIS or disconnect the contacts and set it up as if it was a manual focus lens (with the R7s own Problem sticking to 50mm at startup, ALWAYS!)
Were all of these non-IS lenses? There is no option to turn IBIS on with a lens that has its own IS. It only shows up on lenses that don't have built-in IS.