I'll believe this when I see it. The impulse to short term greed is a tough thing to change. This will not come about without new public policy. Vote Democrat in 2020.
If they are serious about this the CEOs will tie their salaries to wages of their front line workers, as is the case in Japan. A CEO can only be paid, say, 50 times more than median wages of their firms. Not holding my breath on that one.
@@loganmclean4912 Which is why they would be paid 50 times more than a front line worker. There is no way that a CEO is a 1000+ times more important than anyone.
@@pakpala1 It's more than a mere belief. It's akin to an organized religion with traditions, tenets, approved "holy texts" & hymnal. Any small businesses seen as threatening are labeled heretical & then coopted into the universal church of greed.
Or we could just string a few CEOS up by their shoelaces in the public square. They know they already have caused the next coming recession and they are trying to avoid the pitchforks.
They’re getting scared! Just shows Bernie is right. When the people rally together and demand change. They get it. But he needs to get into the White House!
This is the same guy who couldn't come up with the answer to the question " How do you help an entry salary employee of Morgan Chase afford to live?" He couldn't come up with the answer - raise to a living wage.
Come on now, there’s no way that they realized that something as simple as making it so your own employees can afford your products might actually be a good thing. Or that keeping your workforce and customers alive and healthy will pay in the long run. They’re sensing a shift and trying to stay afloat or something. But whatever it is, it most certainly isn’t decency.
they see the storm forming and they are just looking to hold on to the strings of power while doing as little as possible to actually address the root causes of inequality.
We'll believe these CEOs when we see the change they're "advocating". Kudos to Stephanie for mentioning Bernie. It feels like she's one of the few left at MSNBC who isn't mindlessly shilling Biden.
Maybe he did a survey - after his grilling by a Congress woman, to find out that people at his bank were barely subsisting on the wages they were earning at the bank.
Stakeholder value and corporate governance has been a big deal for years. It’s even taught in the business schools these days, and makes perfect sense from a business perspective too.
Well. Don't trust these companies that they're actually going to do anything... Hound them and hound them and hound them until they pay appropriate taxes and agree to massive structural change. It is definitely a positive sign, though, that they're worried that they need to Look like they are less evil.
It's easy to pat yourself on the back and say "Hey, I know! We should maybe look after our customers and even our workers!" when you have billions of (tax-free) dollars in your back pocket.
Here's a crazy idea: Tax outrageous salaries at outrageous rates. Limit perks. Make Wall Street an investment tool instead of a casino: Eliminate nano-second trading, tax stock sales held less than 5 years at double the rate, less than 2 years at four times the rate. CEO's are self-serving narcissists who lack any real empathy because we have created a system that incentives such personalities.
We need a serious overhaul of the laws concerning Corporations, and the first thing that needs to be changed is the Corporate Veil, Investors should be held responsible for HOW their money is made.
Employees are just as important as any piece of equipment in a business, take care of them and they will take care of you. Screw them and you get what you pay for.
The irony is, that they can only argue from this position, because they've been allowed to amass oligopoly powers, which these CEOs use to ruthlessly expoit their employees. Don't be fooled guys - the only changes they want to make, are ones that benefit them.
How can General Motors build a car, Delta fly a plane or Equifax sell a credit report without paying the hardest working people in the company the most amount of money? All it takes is one executive and no union.
Nonsense. What they claim as new rules have always been the rules. American corporations just quit playing by the rules until they couldn't get away with it anymore.
You know, when the GOB says the economy is booming, how do they explain why half the American workforce makes less than $40K a year and lives on a shoestring and can barely breathe. The economy will be "booming" when people can afford their housing, medical care, education and put savings in the bank. THAT's what a booming economy looks like. Can we do that? No.
Stall, deflect, delay the inevitable. But just now we are supposed to believe in this kinder, gentler form of capitalism? Think I heard that under Reagan.
Do I believe they will act beyond their fiduciary responsibility to remain beholden to their shareholders and act on behalf of their employees and communities??? NOPE!! But I am more than happy to be proven wrong.
Sounds like "All talk and no cattle." It's nothing more than an empty and vapid promise to placate the masses. We want to see real change like lowering CEO pay, increasing the lowest pay to a livable wage, less outsourcing and more full-time work instead part-time employees and contractors.
Guy came out of the boss office smiling. They ask him; "You look happy. Got a pay rise?" They guy answer; "No, but the boss promised me that this year I will meet santa. This time for sure. Last year he was too busy the boss told me."
Duh..This a revelation to these people? Treat your customers and your suppliers and your employees well and it's good for the company. Really? Who would have thunk it? And these people get paid millions and millions of dollars. What a bunch of hypocritical jerks.
This is so clearly just PR from these companies, it all sounds good, but means nothing when the sh*t hits the fan! That's why we need stronger unions, and more rights for workers!
PR? No, they’re just incompetent DNC operatives being paid under the table to implement socialism. The only people that don’t want a focus on profits are broke and either can’t afford to do business with these companies at all, or can only afford to do a small amount of business with these companies, but not enough to impact the bottom line. The only thing the typical consumer cares about is getting the best quality product or service possible for the best price possible.
Except that this is not really true. Sovereign governments have always had the opportunity to intervene in the global market place. Trump is doing this at the moment with tariffs (not that I agree with him!). The doctrine for many years has been to allow companies to operate in a global market and to minimize barriers to free trade but this has not worked very well for the working populations of many of the more wealthy markets where labor is expensive. It would, for example, be perfectly within the US governments rights to refuse to trade with countries/companies that do not meet certain standards on pollution, do not provide adequate healthcare to their employees or who require employees to work more than a certain number of hours per week, factors that contribute to the unequal cost bases that make manufacturing in the USA expensive.
Workers of the world, unite, and demand a Global Minimum Wage. The people who work hard to make our t-shirts and underwear should be paid the same rate as the people who check them out at the till. Management should be replaced by AIs.
@@boxoffrogs The heck are you talking about?. Many developing & 3rd world nations have little choice but to accept investments on the terms of the Companies coming in besides, the Richer nations tie their loans, aids to these developments. Don't be naive.
They must have figured out a new way to screw over their customers and they're going to make it seem like it's in their customer's best interest. Remember, they have already sold their souls to greed.
Anyone who believes these sociopaths is a worse fool. If these corporations paid taxes at the same rate as the people who clean their toilets, every country they operate in could afford a cradle to grave welfare system, medical care, education, affordable housing. Oh yeah, and the corporations that broadcast this waffle to us are also a major part of the problem.
We could also incentive companies by issuing higher tax rates for corporations. Companies used to rather pay people more money or more benefits then pay more in taxes. Also fine companies who use illegal immigrants or offshore labor or use tax havens. Don’t wait for leadership of the masses to come from CEOs or banks.
The modus operandi being entertained by today's corporate bigwigs is best described as "privatizing the profits and socializing the losses." The big boys expect the taxpayer to bail them out and wipe their sorry rear ends any time the corporate balance sheet goes into the red. This is all so much corporate socialism (corporatism, which is another term for fascism). It's all a matter of "socialism for the rich, free enterprise for the poor." I believe the U.S. electorate made it abundantly clear in 2016 that we will have none of that.
Monopoly’s are unconstitutional. Preferably sinking the ship yields greater returns for all. We don’t need them to keep business going, the business need us both workers and consumers.... a man should be able to afford the things he build, in all fairness🦅
They took their Trump corporate tax break and invested heavily in stock buybacks, which causes the share prices to rise making money (bonuses and stock option plans) for themselves and pumping up their shareholders values while doing absolutely nothing for their employees. What happened with raises, increasing employer share of healthcare premiums, new hiring, increasing 401k matching, providing longer vacation accruals, paying a $15hr minimum wage, or a host of other things? Nothing....that’s what happened.
"Dance little puppets, dance... Dance! The monetary system will work for you, as long as you continue to work for us! Should you so much as even think of trying to change the system to work for yourselves, we'll show you just how dependent you really are on these useless scraps of paper!"
Wait a minute? Do you actually mean that there is more than one way to implement capitalism, and Americans might have been getting it wrong for so long? Whooda thunk?
*_Tax cuts for the rich, supply-side economics, voodoo economics, Reaganomics, trickle-down economics have all been proven to be a failed economics approach._* In 1981 David Stockman, the OMB director, wrote an artical published in The Atlanta that Reagan's economic program would lead the country into huge deficits. After his famous visit to the woodshed David softened his words a bit. But Senator Alan Cranston remarked that the country would be shocked if they knew that the budget was based on numbers pulled out of thin air. *_Why can't tax cuts for the wealthy be formally shown to be a failed strategy so we as a country can move on in a reality based economic system?_* Remember, GW Bush borrowed money from China to give to the wealthy as a tax cut. Republicans do not care about reducing the national debt. I've got to say something on behalf of Kamala Harris to clear up on her healthcare plan. *Kamala Harris on Healthcare* (details) Medicare for all but people can keep their plans for the first ten years. A ten year phase in. Many people want to know that they have an option to keep a private plan. A private option. The plan is to allow the private companies to comply with the plans that will be put into place for who will be part of our Medicare system. For example, they can no longer be about raising the deductibles and copays... It will be the case that regardless of whether you have a private care plan or Medicare plan when you walk into that office you don't have to lay down you credit card, you lay down you Medicare card. Employers right now offer their employees a private plan. I am separating the employer from your healthcare so you have the option of signing up with a private plan with Medicare. So, it's not going to be through your employer. So if you leave your job you don't have to change you healthcare plan. Many people are stuck to their jobs because they want to keep that healthplan. That should not be the case in America especially when forecasts show that many of today's jobs will not exist in the future. Also, a lot of people are changing employers more frequently. It used to be that you finish school and go work in one place until you retire. That is no longer the case. And no one should have to worry about losing their job or changing their job and lose their healthcare. So this is Kamala Harris's healthcare plan and It's good enough for me so and the fact that she's the strongest debater leaves her in first choice to debate Trump. I transcribed this from her talk with Anderson Cooper. In addition, Tulsi Gabbard was a medic in the armed forces. Soldiers were brought to her for treatment. She was not on the front lines shooting at the enemy. And when Tulsie criticized Harris for not using exculpatory evidence... It was the law that Harris followed, furthermore, that was one case she cited. It's clear from the debate that Tulsie Gabbard has no administrative experience or skills to manage systems on a large scale. In conclusion, Kamala Harris will wipe the floor with Trump. When I saw Kamala Harris question AG Barr I knew she was the one to take on Trump. Tulsi Gabbard would go limp in a debate with Trump. Kamala Harris would interrogate Trump like a prosecutor.
🤣🤣I find it funny now the CEOs are trying to get in front of a possible recession by saying they need to serve a new purpose other than the shareholders.... They at least smart enough to know their corporate greed has handicapped the economy to the point it's struggling to grow, and now the signals are showing that it may retract.
That's it, I have had it! My indexed 401K has not grown in a year! It's worth is the same as last year at this time! I would do better in bank CDs and they are FDIC insured. I AM OUT!!! Trump's great economy is bull!
CEO: well all our dirty laundry is in public veiw...now what? CFO: lets pretend to everyone we actually care about the world and people around us. CEO: ahahahahahaha nice joke lets just lie, its way cheaper!
Amazing how a Freudian slip such as inserting "corporate" for "country" is so easily spoken. Here's to making the United Corporations of America great again. Oops. Did I say Corporations? I meant States.
Sounds like some CEOs trying to get out ahead of a Sanders or Warren presidency and build some "good faith" public relations brownie points when regulations come crashing down.
Talk is cheap. If they can convince enough people that they are actually going to do something then perhaps they can squeeze out a few more bucks for themselves and their friends. Voluntary guidelines are no better than self-"regulation". It's just a delaying tactic.
I'll believe this when I see it. The impulse to short term greed is a tough thing to change. This will not come about without new public policy. Vote Democrat in 2020.
ronkirk50 Elizabeth warren
They have finally realized that they have screwed over the middle class so much that they have destroyed their customer base
If they are serious about this the CEOs will tie their salaries to wages of their front line workers, as is the case in Japan. A CEO can only be paid, say, 50 times more than median wages of their firms. Not holding my breath on that one.
A CEOs job is more important than a front line worker.
@@loganmclean4912 The Ayn Rand argument, eh?
@@loganmclean4912 Which is why they would be paid 50 times more than a front line worker.
There is no way that a CEO is a 1000+ times more important than anyone.
In America, they believe in greed.
@@pakpala1 It's more than a mere belief. It's akin to an organized religion with traditions, tenets, approved "holy texts" & hymnal. Any small businesses seen as threatening are labeled heretical & then coopted into the universal church of greed.
Or we could just string a few CEOS up by their shoelaces in the public square. They know they already have caused the next coming recession and they are trying to avoid the pitchforks.
You would have to roast a CEO very slowly or else they will be tough and chewy.
Wow - this is GOOD NEWS for a change!!
Don't be fooled :/
They’re getting scared! Just shows Bernie is right. When the people rally together and demand change. They get it. But he needs to get into the White House!
This is the same guy who couldn't come up with the answer to the question " How do you help an entry salary employee of Morgan Chase afford to live?" He couldn't come up with the answer - raise to a living wage.
Come on now - he did suggest the employee could get a loan. That was kind of him
Come on now, there’s no way that they realized that something as simple as making it so your own employees can afford your products might actually be a good thing. Or that keeping your workforce and customers alive and healthy will pay in the long run. They’re sensing a shift and trying to stay afloat or something. But whatever it is, it most certainly isn’t decency.
Keep up the pressure American people, they're starting to realise that inequality leads to revolution.
Seriously, it's like they never read a history book until just now, still I'm not holding my breath
they see the storm forming and they are just looking to hold on to the strings of power while doing as little as possible to actually address the root causes of inequality.
I'll believe it when I see it. This is just for publicity.
That is America, today...
They felt the heat coming that’s all. People starting to follow the money. Just wait until they feel the Bern. 🔥
They know pitchforks are coming!!!!
They're full of crap, these people are not on your side, just ask them what they think about unions.
smoke screen dont buy it they ar buying time while they gather complete power behind the curtain
There should be a maximum wage
That’s communism and unconstitutional. You guys claimed people don’t make enough, now you are trying to prevent people from making more.
There's only one word that comes to mind "bullshiite!!"
The fact that these guys are CEOs is the best possible proof they're lying through their teeth when talking about 'changing the rules of capitalism.'
The small busisness owner is also a CEO.
We'll believe these CEOs when we see the change they're "advocating". Kudos to Stephanie for mentioning Bernie. It feels like she's one of the few left at MSNBC who isn't mindlessly shilling Biden.
Maybe they should start by rejecting a trillion dollar tax cut........hypocrites.
Maybe he did a survey - after his grilling by a Congress woman, to find out that people at his bank were barely subsisting on the wages they were earning at the bank.
But that's ok - they could get a loan, remember?
Maybe they didn't make enough money to qualify for a loan ;)
I hope they can all make a group photo when they are in prison. CEO's are corrupt, greed driven, inhuman monsters. So there!
They are just the puppets. The real monsters live in the shadows.
Stakeholder value and corporate governance has been a big deal for years. It’s even taught in the business schools these days, and makes perfect sense from a business perspective too.
Well. Don't trust these companies that they're actually going to do anything... Hound them and hound them and hound them until they pay appropriate taxes and agree to massive structural change. It is definitely a positive sign, though, that they're worried that they need to Look like they are less evil.
It's easy to pat yourself on the back and say "Hey, I know! We should maybe look after our customers and even our workers!" when you have billions of (tax-free) dollars in your back pocket.
Here's a crazy idea: Tax outrageous salaries at outrageous rates. Limit perks. Make Wall Street an investment tool instead of a casino: Eliminate nano-second trading, tax stock sales held less than 5 years at double the rate, less than 2 years at four times the rate.
CEO's are self-serving narcissists who lack any real empathy because we have created a system that incentives such personalities.
We need a serious overhaul of the laws concerning Corporations, and the first thing that needs to be changed is the Corporate Veil, Investors should be held responsible for HOW their money is made.
Agree with Diamon but it must be enforced through the law. None of this self regulation BS.
Employees are just as important as any piece of equipment in a business, take care of them and they will take care of you. Screw them and you get what you pay for.
When you think about Paying Taxes. !!!!!!, It’s absolutely time
Maybe the CEO's have realized that they squeezed the workers too far. In the real economy people need to be able to afford to buy real products.
The irony is, that they can only argue from this position, because they've been allowed to amass oligopoly powers, which these CEOs use to ruthlessly expoit their employees. Don't be fooled guys - the only changes they want to make, are ones that benefit them.
No. No that's not a legal possibility.
YEAH RIGHT you let ceos decide that we work for free as slaves.
Yes, Amazon, please pay your taxes so my grandchildren are not stuck with this horrific national debt.
How can General Motors build a car, Delta fly a plane or Equifax sell a credit report without paying the hardest working people in the company the most amount of money? All it takes is one executive and no union.
Stop taxing corporate income. Start taxing CEOs and those who get it.Billionaires should not exist where others are in poverty.
Really???? I see MANY NOSES GROWING LONGER!!!!!
Nonsense. What they claim as new rules have always been the rules. American corporations just quit playing by the rules until they couldn't get away with it anymore.
Talking about it and actually executing a change are two different things. Don't hold your breath.
You know, when the GOB says the economy is booming, how do they explain why half the American workforce makes less than $40K a year and lives on a shoestring and can barely breathe. The economy will be "booming" when people can afford their housing, medical care, education and put savings in the bank. THAT's what a booming economy looks like. Can we do that? No.
Stall, deflect, delay the inevitable. But just now we are supposed to believe in this kinder, gentler form of capitalism? Think I heard that under Reagan.
The new way these companies are talking is a dream that started almost at the time greed began. So, their words are hollow at the moment.
Do I believe they will act beyond their fiduciary responsibility to remain beholden to their shareholders and act on behalf of their employees and communities??? NOPE!! But I am more than happy to be proven wrong.
Wtf is esoteric about profits first? It's just greed.
smart guy
If they really meant to make changes they would immediately begin paying workers a living wage
Sounds like "All talk and no cattle." It's nothing more than an empty and vapid promise to placate the masses. We want to see real change like lowering CEO pay, increasing the lowest pay to a livable wage, less outsourcing and more full-time work instead part-time employees and contractors.
has taken them more than 25 years to get it, finally
Actions speak louder than these empty words
About time they wake up!
Guy came out of the boss office smiling. They ask him; "You look happy. Got a pay rise?" They guy answer; "No, but the boss promised me that this year I will meet santa. This time for sure. Last year he was too busy the boss told me."
Duh..This a revelation to these people? Treat your customers and your suppliers and your employees well and it's good for the company. Really? Who would have thunk it? And these people get paid millions and millions of dollars. What a bunch of hypocritical jerks.
I've heard this story before during the Reagan era.
This is so clearly just PR from these companies, it all sounds good, but means nothing when the sh*t hits the fan! That's why we need stronger unions, and more rights for workers!
PR? No, they’re just incompetent DNC operatives being paid under the table to implement socialism. The only people that don’t want a focus on profits are broke and either can’t afford to do business with these companies at all, or can only afford to do a small amount of business with these companies, but not enough to impact the bottom line. The only thing the typical consumer cares about is getting the best quality product or service possible for the best price possible.
Uhhhhhhh Yang Gang
We need real capitalism, we never really had it.
You've to have a global political will - it's a global market place. Business goes with where labor is cheapest.
Except that this is not really true. Sovereign governments have always had the opportunity to intervene in the global market place. Trump is doing this at the moment with tariffs (not that I agree with him!). The doctrine for many years has been to allow companies to operate in a global market and to minimize barriers to free trade but this has not worked very well for the working populations of many of the more wealthy markets where labor is expensive. It would, for example, be perfectly within the US governments rights to refuse to trade with countries/companies that do not meet certain standards on pollution, do not provide adequate healthcare to their employees or who require employees to work more than a certain number of hours per week, factors that contribute to the unequal cost bases that make manufacturing in the USA expensive.
Workers of the world, unite, and demand a Global Minimum Wage.
The people who work hard to make our t-shirts and underwear should be paid the same rate as the people who check them out at the till.
Management should be replaced by AIs.
@@johnnybourgeois13 Tell that to Chinese prisoners who give free labor
@@boxoffrogs The heck are you talking about?. Many developing & 3rd world nations have little choice but to accept investments on the terms of the Companies coming in besides, the Richer nations tie their loans, aids to these developments. Don't be naive.
They must have figured out a new way to screw over their customers and they're going to make it seem like it's in their customer's best interest. Remember, they have already sold their souls to greed.
Anyone who believes these sociopaths is a worse fool. If these corporations paid taxes at the same rate as the people who clean their toilets, every country they operate in could afford a cradle to grave welfare system, medical care, education, affordable housing.
Oh yeah, and the corporations that broadcast this waffle to us are also a major part of the problem.
so, now they are admitting that "shareholder benefits are/were everything?"
Not sure I believe they are committed. But it is interesting that they are so out of sink with The Dumpster.
Would any Board of Directors stand for this, or vote out executives that won't manage the company for maximum short-term value?
It’s called “fascism”.
We could also incentive companies by issuing higher tax rates for corporations. Companies used to rather pay people more money or more benefits then pay more in taxes. Also fine companies who use illegal immigrants or offshore labor or use tax havens. Don’t wait for leadership of the masses to come from CEOs or banks.
might be more interesting to actually interview one of those ceos :/
They are self serving crooks.
The modus operandi being entertained by today's corporate bigwigs is best described as "privatizing the profits and socializing the losses." The big boys expect the taxpayer to bail them out and wipe their sorry rear ends any time the corporate balance sheet goes into the red. This is all so much corporate socialism (corporatism, which is another term for fascism). It's all a matter of "socialism for the rich, free enterprise for the poor." I believe the U.S. electorate made it abundantly clear in 2016 that we will have none of that.
So CEOs are going to reinstitute pension plans and expand healthcare for employees...?
I'm suspicious.
This is just a giant gas light.
Sounds good! All those CEOs are welling to take less bonus?
Bernie Sanders effect.
Monopoly’s are unconstitutional. Preferably sinking the ship yields greater returns for all. We don’t need them to keep business going, the business need us both workers and consumers.... a man should be able to afford the things he build, in all fairness🦅
this is someone from the future. in 2022 it's worse.
They took their Trump corporate tax break and invested heavily in stock buybacks, which causes the share prices to rise making money (bonuses and stock option plans) for themselves and pumping up their shareholders values while doing absolutely nothing for their employees. What happened with raises, increasing employer share of healthcare premiums, new hiring, increasing 401k matching, providing longer vacation accruals, paying a $15hr minimum wage, or a host of other things? Nothing....that’s what happened.
"Dance little puppets, dance... Dance!
The monetary system will work for you, as long as you continue to work for us!
Should you so much as even think of trying to change the system to work for yourselves,
we'll show you just how dependent you really are on these useless scraps of paper!"
yeah, we let them regulate themselves and they cheat the game everytime.
I like yellow tie guy :)
They’re scared of Elizabeth Warren lol
Wait a minute? Do you actually mean that there is more than one way to implement capitalism, and Americans might have been getting it wrong for so long? Whooda thunk?
So they get more money.
.....sounds food on paper-->BUT
*_Tax cuts for the rich, supply-side economics, voodoo economics, Reaganomics, trickle-down economics have all been proven to be a failed economics approach._* In 1981 David Stockman, the OMB director, wrote an artical published in The Atlanta that Reagan's economic program would lead the country into huge deficits. After his famous visit to the woodshed David softened his words a bit. But Senator Alan Cranston remarked that the country would be shocked if they knew that the budget was based on numbers pulled out of thin air. *_Why can't tax cuts for the wealthy be formally shown to be a failed strategy so we as a country can move on in a reality based economic system?_* Remember, GW Bush borrowed money from China to give to the wealthy as a tax cut. Republicans do not care about reducing the national debt.
I've got to say something on behalf of Kamala Harris to clear up on her healthcare plan.
*Kamala Harris on Healthcare* (details)
Medicare for all but people can keep their plans for the first ten years. A ten year phase in. Many people want to know that they have an option to keep a private plan. A private option. The plan is to allow the private companies to comply with the plans that will be put into place for who will be part of our Medicare system. For example, they can no longer be about raising the deductibles and copays... It will be the case that regardless of whether you have a private care plan or Medicare plan when you walk into that office you don't have to lay down you credit card, you lay down you Medicare card.
Employers right now offer their employees a private plan. I am separating the employer from your healthcare so you have the option of signing up with a private plan with Medicare. So, it's not going to be through your employer. So if you leave your job you don't have to change you healthcare plan. Many people are stuck to their jobs because they want to keep that healthplan.
That should not be the case in America especially when forecasts show that many of today's jobs will not exist in the future. Also, a lot of people are changing employers more frequently. It used to be that you finish school and go work in one place until you retire. That is no longer the case.
And no one should have to worry about losing their job or changing their job and lose their healthcare.
So this is Kamala Harris's healthcare plan and It's good enough for me so and the fact that she's the strongest debater leaves her in first choice to debate Trump. I transcribed this from her talk with Anderson Cooper. In addition, Tulsi Gabbard was a medic in the armed forces. Soldiers were brought to her for treatment. She was not on the front lines shooting at the enemy. And when Tulsie criticized Harris for not using exculpatory evidence... It was the law that Harris followed, furthermore, that was one case she cited. It's clear from the debate that Tulsie Gabbard has no administrative experience or skills to manage systems on a large scale.
In conclusion, Kamala Harris will wipe the floor with Trump. When I saw Kamala Harris question AG Barr I knew she was the one to take on Trump. Tulsi Gabbard would go limp in a debate with Trump. Kamala Harris would interrogate Trump like a prosecutor.
Well shouldn't they have been doing that all along?
🤣🤣I find it funny now the CEOs are trying to get in front of a possible recession by saying they need to serve a new purpose other than the shareholders....
They at least smart enough to know their corporate greed has handicapped the economy to the point it's struggling to grow, and now the signals are showing that it may retract.
That's it, I have had it! My indexed 401K has not grown in a year! It's worth is the same as last year at this time! I would do better in bank CDs and they are FDIC insured. I AM OUT!!! Trump's great economy is bull!
No, no - it's the best it's been in the entire history of the USA - maybe the whole world! Or even the universe! Lots of people will tell you!
CEO: well all our dirty laundry is in public veiw...now what?
CFO: lets pretend to everyone we actually care about the world and people around us.
CEO: ahahahahahaha nice joke lets just lie, its way cheaper!
Lol they just realized this? Nope the people are fed up with the greed. And they realize this.
#WokeCapitalism while doing business as usual. Thankfully we are not all retar.. oh .. nvm.
Take pay cuts excutes and show you are serious!
Amazing how a Freudian slip such as inserting "corporate" for "country" is so easily spoken. Here's to making the United Corporations of America great again. Oops. Did I say Corporations? I meant States.
Welcome to Pottersville or Bedford Falls?
Is this the onion?
Well that’s nice, this is what NGOs and social entrepreneurs do,
Sounds like some CEOs trying to get out ahead of a Sanders or Warren presidency and build some "good faith" public relations brownie points when regulations come crashing down.
Talk is cheap. If they can convince enough people that they are actually going to do something then perhaps they can squeeze out a few more bucks for themselves and their friends. Voluntary guidelines are no better than self-"regulation". It's just a delaying tactic.
Ya we care about out employees to maintain jobs we are laying off 50%
They must have spoke to Andrew Yang #FreedomDividend
Yes just like United health is going to give you better healthcare...
Finally !
🤔🙄🤐
Real reporting and accountability????