True Cause Of Hyperinflation: Central Bank Insolvency | Dr. Ingo Sauer

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
  • Finally, you can easily access Bitcoin in a low-cost ETF with the VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Visit vaneck.com/HODLFG to learn more.
    VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) Prospectus: vaneck.com/hodlprospectus/
    __
    Dr. Ingo Sauer of Goethe University Frankfurt joins Forward Guidance to share findings from his 360 paper on Hyperinflation in 1923 and its connection to central bank insolvency. Sauer argues that severe impairment of central bank assets, and not the printing of vast amounts of central bank liabilities (money), was the primary cause of extreme inflation witnessed 101 years ago in Germany, Austria, Hungary and Poland. Sauer inverts the causal line of exchange rate depreciation, money supply increase, and inflation, and he also shares his concern about the current state of the balance sheet of the European Central Bank (ECB). Filmed on March 5, 2024.
    __
    Ingo Sauer’s TH-cam channel: / @wissenhatkeineneigent...
    Ingo Sauer’s 360 page paper, “The Lessons from 1923 for the Euro Area: Enlightening the Dark Side of (In-) Solvent Central Banks’ Balance Sheets”: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...
    Follow VanEck on Twitter / vaneck_us
    Follow Jack Farley on Twitter / jackfarley96
    Follow Forward Guidance on Twitter / forwardguidance
    Follow Blockworks on Twitter / blockworks_
    __
    Timestamps:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:17 Overview Of Dr. Sauer's Theory On The Ultimate Cause of Hyperinflation: Central Bank Insolvency
    06:25 Dr. Sauer's Concerns About The Euro
    10:42 Setting The Stage For German Hyperinflation in 1923
    13:53 The German Mark During World War I
    21:00 The Assets Of The Reichsbank Increasingly Became Dominated By German Government Obligations (Not Commercial Bills / Collateral Advances / Gold)
    29:23 Central Bank Insolvency (Not Money Supply Increase) Caused Hyperinflation in 1923
    34:13 VanEck Ad
    36:08 Failed Attempts To Stabilize German Mark And Inflation, 1919-1922
    41:04 Reichsbank's Holdings Of German Treasury Bills Highly Correlated To (In)Solvency Factor
    44:21 Explaining Sauer's "Solvency Factor"
    46:49 The Mark's Short-Lived Rally In 1920
    56:29 The Mechanics Of Central Bank Insolvency
    59:01 Reichsmark Insolvency Led To Depreciation Of The Mark, Which Led To Hyperinflation
    01:01:55 Money Supply Did Not Cause Hyperinflation, Argues Sauer
    01:14:29 The Explosion In Reichsbank's Money Supply Was Mostly Paper Cash, Not Bank Reserves
    01:22:23 Reparations' Impact On German Solvency
    01:26:42 The Rentenmark And The Halting Of German HyperInflation
    01:30:07 Central Bank Profits and Yield Curve Dynamics
    01:34:18 European Debt Crisis (2009-2015)
    01:36:05 Fed As Dealer Of Last Resort, European Central Bank (ECB) As Market Maker Of Last Resort
    01:37:27 ECB Is Less A Central Bank And More Of A "Headquarters" For Domestic Euro 01:Central Banks (such as Bank of France, for example)
    01:39:43 Origin Of Fed, And Clearinghouse Loan Certificates As National Currency Before The Fed
    01:43:38 Why Has ECB Balance Sheet Expansion Post 2008 Coincided With Disinflation (Or Deflation), And Not Hyperinflation?
    01:47:04 Sauer's Fears About The ECB And The Euro
    02:00:07 The Mechanics Of Monetary Financing
    02:17:52 Interest Rate Risk Is Not A Systemic Concern
    __
    Disclaimer: Nothing discussed on Forward Guidance should be considered as investment advice. Please always do your own research & speak to a financial advisor before thinking about, thinking about putting your money into these crazy markets.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 111

  • @BlockworksHQ
    @BlockworksHQ  หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    Finally, you can easily access Bitcoin in a low-cost ETF with the VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Visit vaneck.com/HODLFG to learn more.

    • @user-wj7cv9hb5j
      @user-wj7cv9hb5j 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Only a fool gambles on bitcoin or any crypto. Go to play horses.

  • @ThePbsuccess
    @ThePbsuccess หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Marathon session holy cow

  • @rof8200
    @rof8200 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This is excellent analysis. Thank you professor and thank you blockworks.

  • @rof8200
    @rof8200 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    If oil and gas in the US shale oil sector peak and run down, confidence in the USD and USTs would erode.

    • @JustBob-sw4rf
      @JustBob-sw4rf หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, but it’s not that simple. First, the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency that creates demand that normally wouldn’t exist. Second, all the other global fiat currencies are being abused as bad, if not worse, than the dollar. Along those lines: China, Europe, and Japan are also net energy importers. Third, the massive US military and CIA will work to punish, or overthrow, any country’s leadership that becomes resistant to taking US dollars for its resources.

    • @SzymonStas
      @SzymonStas หลายเดือนก่อน

      US crude oil production is down 400,000bpd since December, from a high of 13 million bpd to 12.6 million. It looks like shale is already starting to peak.

    • @hungrylion8703
      @hungrylion8703 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SzymonStasbarrel counting is worthless. That shale oil never existed.

    • @ginamurray711
      @ginamurray711 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They will cut off US oil exports.

    • @s0.0s
      @s0.0s 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nonsense.

  • @samuraichicken9620
    @samuraichicken9620 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I like this extra long recording. Also I've always liked that usually Blockworks videos are long enough to develop subjects well.

  • @jeffb.140
    @jeffb.140 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Excellent analysis and very likely more important for contemporary times than many expect

  • @velisvideos6208
    @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks for this excellent discussion. It answered several questions I have been struggling with for a few decades. A very valuable contribution, Dr. Sauer!

  • @idontwantyouraccount
    @idontwantyouraccount หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Jack and Dr. Sauer: thank you so much for releasing your paper without paywall. Look forward to reading it after this excellent webcast.

  • @mungoblakey1494
    @mungoblakey1494 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the internet! Thanks Jack for shining more light on this fascinating topic, bitcoin people always point to this period as endless printing causing the collapse, but as Sauer points out it was the lack of faith in the institution and the reckless FX defending with the gold. Such a misunderstood period of history 1920s Germany :)

  • @melodydean152
    @melodydean152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Absolutely fascinating interview. I had to listen to it a couple of times but definitely worth it!

  • @AdventurerPrimefire
    @AdventurerPrimefire หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bot even half way though and already one of my favorite episodes of monitary theory from anywhere. I find myself in constant alignment with Dr Sauer's reasoning especially in ways where I have found criticism with others. And though this support I feel my own convictions growing.

  • @alanbartram3147
    @alanbartram3147 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant !!!! … now I need to listen again to pick up all the bits I only partially absorbed … interesting in so many ways … EU risks … 1920s understanding … Fed difference / risks … Argentina today !!!

    • @bruceposch1449
      @bruceposch1449 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm listening to it the second time right now

  • @fragranthills
    @fragranthills หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent explanation of the effect of central bank insolvency. Thank you.

    • @keyisersoze
      @keyisersoze หลายเดือนก่อน

      Central banks cannot become insolvent as they operate differently from commercial banks and private financial institutions.
      Insolvency is inevitable for the private sector and the real economy if that nation's central bank doesn't rescue them.

    • @SSC0815
      @SSC0815 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​​​@@keyisersoze Although central banks cant technically go insolvent (they simply can print their own curreny as long as there is no forign claims) the conecpt of insolvency can still apply to them. Thats the case when they are not able to defend the exchange rate.

    • @keyisersoze
      @keyisersoze 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@SSC0815 That's easy to solve: Freeze the accounts and jail the speculators.

  • @user-wf4el1gx3n
    @user-wf4el1gx3n หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I respect this guy’s work on central bank balance sheets, but I often feel discussions around inflation tend to avoid circumstances beyond monetary and fiscal policies. Most hyperinflations seem to coincide with events that severely damage the productive capacity of the economy. In response, government officials tend to choose the more palatable option of inflation over deflation. In the German example discussed here, they lose ability to produce enough food, use gold to import food, are forced to pay huge reparations in marks (which they can print), have significant productive assets like mines confiscated by France and Britain, and lost a huge amount of the labour force in the war. How would you respond? Let people starve or try to print your way out? No wonder they ended up producing such a vengeful generation.

    • @Discoworx
      @Discoworx 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Good points

  • @davo9185
    @davo9185 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    looking sharp Jack!

  • @friendlyboylulea
    @friendlyboylulea หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    central bank insolvency is a relative game. I would say all central banks are insolvent because they have monetized so much government debt that there is no way they can be paid back. It is just some central banks are less insolvent. e.g. ECB is less insolvent than the Argentinian central bank.

    • @keyisersoze
      @keyisersoze หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Our problem is much bigger than that of central banks. It involves population growth, overproduction, credit, interest, and endless consumption.

  • @mattanderson6672
    @mattanderson6672 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks guys!

  • @mikle65
    @mikle65 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ja

  • @miltonberg5534
    @miltonberg5534 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    More Enlightening than Friedman and Schwartz.

  • @jcliu
    @jcliu หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If central bank insolvency was an actual risk, can someone explain how Japan still exists as a country?

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Japan has no lack of foreign assets. Quite the contrary. Try replicating their policies, for instance if you were Cuba, and you'll quickly see some problems.

  • @FireEverLiving
    @FireEverLiving หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I watched this whole thing, and there were a lot of interesting ideas, but I feel like I only got 20% of what he was saying because he kept going on confusing tangents. I'd love for you to someday bring on some other expert who read his big paper and can explain it better.

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      TL;DR - The rest of the world realized Germany was bankrupt after the war, so wouldn't trade in the Reichs (global) mark, and insisted on hard value assets in trade. Nobody wanted the currency inside the country, so the currency's velocity went to near infinity causing the hyperinflation. The Rentenmark was an asset back currency (land rents), so it was accepted in internal trade, where the Reichs mark had no intrinsic or faith value. It was only after the Reichs mark was backed by _something_ (according to Ingo, by central bank recapitalization), that it could be accepted as a currency of any value both externally and internally. This leads to exchange rate stability and drop in inflation levels as the velocity drops to reasonable levels.
      I did not read his paper and could only get through 50 minutes of the interview. But I lived in Argentina, so already intuitively understood unbacked currencies, hyperinflation, money velocity, and central bank (in)solvency.

  • @gaggag6366
    @gaggag6366 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maschine ingo

  • @dt-jy1ig
    @dt-jy1ig หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting and informative thanks

  • @JoshuaMallory
    @JoshuaMallory หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    30y bond yield so close to flipping 2y bond yield🎉 salute your equity shorts

  • @jasongrig
    @jasongrig หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    his statistical test sense makes sense to me

  • @darnellcapriccioso
    @darnellcapriccioso หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I'm admittedly bummed that I didn't go with my gut instinct & buy bitcoin few months back when it was $20k - $25k range. is it too late to get in and make profits? i have set aside $450k to get fully invested this year

    • @richardhudson1243
      @richardhudson1243 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Anything under 69k is a good buy. It's still advisable to work with a fiduciary advisor instead of relying solely on speculations..

    • @maiadazz
      @maiadazz หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The only issue you might have is the fear of missing out, just like everyone else. A good number of people discredit the effectiveness of financial advisors in exploring new market opportunities, but over the past 10years I’ve had a financial advisor consistently restructure and diversify my portfolio/expenses and I’ve made over $1million in gains… might not be a lot but i'm financially secure.

    • @tatianastarcic
      @tatianastarcic หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      great gains there! mind sharing details of your advisor pleas? i've started gaining more cash flow with my employment and looking at putting money into stocks and alternative assets that can help build wealth over time

    • @maiadazz
      @maiadazz หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      She goes by ‘’Melissa Terri Swayne’ I suggest you look her up. To be honest, I almost didn't buy the idea of letting someone handle growing my finance, but so glad I did.

    • @nicolasbenson009
      @nicolasbenson009 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I just looked her up on the internet and found her webpage with her credentials. I wrote her a outlining my financial objectives and planned a call with her.

  • @velisvideos6208
    @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I am ever so grateful to Dr Sauer for debunking the quantity of money "theory" by Friedman. It never made sense, and still doesn't. For instance, considering just myself; I have never had any urge to spend money just because it was sitting on my bank account. Never. Thus, the quantity of money has no effect on demand and no effect on prices. It may have been different when I received an increase in INCOME, then possibly once or twice I did allow myself to increase spending also, thus affecting prices. It has always bugged me that Milton Friedman could not see this difference, and it particularly bugged me when he got the Nobel prize. But, there again, the Nobel prize for Economics is nearly as flawed as the one for Peace...

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Classical economics seems to discount the effect of money velocity (measurable) and dismiss the public's perception of money value (not measurable). As we saw in Germany and Argentina, when the public perceives the value of their currency depleting rapidly, they dump it for goods or assets. This increases velocity and causes inflation as the public demands more currency for their valuable goods and assets as people anticipate currency value degradation. In Argentina, the "austral" currency restored stability when it was dollar pegged, and the German Rentenmark was backed by land rents and so could achieve stable perceived value and actual velocity.
      Exchange rates can measure purchasing power parity, but it is at a loss to explain the _why_ of currencies going worthless on the FX exchanges, notwithstanding Dr. Sauer's attempts with central bank (in)solvencies. Central banks can only act as a buffer to exchange rate stability, and only then when global customers can find nothing to buy from another country using that other country's currency.

  • @ianmorgan7113
    @ianmorgan7113 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The problem is, is that the central Bank like politicians are supposed to be acting in the best interest of the citizenship that provides that value.

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      When national treasuries treat their central banks as a piggy bank to be raided, this is the logical outcome.

  • @velisvideos6208
    @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Instead of insolvent: desolvent or dissolvent?

  • @skillz4life360
    @skillz4life360 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How can you willingly and consciously ignore private bank money creation and derivatives. Academics vs practitioners

    • @Diogenes_83425
      @Diogenes_83425 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lissen to the first three sentences of Sauer again. Case closed.

    • @skillz4life360
      @skillz4life360 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Diogenes_83425That isn't conclusive in my opinion. This study is extremely narrow in that all the hyperinflations took place during WW1 and WW2. There have been dozens of other ones after that that would conflict w/his thesis. Because every hyperinflation happening now is because they can't get access to private bank money and are forced to print and debase, which is my point. System now is extremely different

    • @Diogenes_83425
      @Diogenes_83425 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skillz4life360 1. German Hyperinflation did not take place during WW1 but in 1923.
      2. There is no "private bank money"
      3. "They" (whoever that is) can’t get access to their citizens funds because of the very reasons Sauer pointed out. One doesn’t lend money (= buy sovereign bonds) to a debtor who is bancrupt. The printing is not the cause but merely a symptom.

    • @skillz4life360
      @skillz4life360 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Diogenes_83425 I think you're splitting hairs when you know exactly what i meant... it took place during that span of time between the start of WW! and WW2. It also took place as a result of WW1. And i'm not sure what you mean, but maybe we're just talking over each other bc of terminology. I'm talking about offshore private bank balance sheet expansion when they (Any bank issuing dollar-denominated loans located outside the united states) have no direct ties to the Fed or dollar authority. This whole system was created in the late 50s and is the system we use today, so it is completely missed by his studies is all i'm saying

  • @bruceposch1449
    @bruceposch1449 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So this boys and girls is your lesson for today, why everyone should have a little physical gold or silver hidden at your arm's reach when the shtf.
    Btc may be ok , but gold is always ok.

  • @luisvictorf
    @luisvictorf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hence CBDC's soon?

  • @richardkut3976
    @richardkut3976 หลายเดือนก่อน

    U.S.A. has "Forever Stamps". Germany "Overprinted" their stamps, with new values. Then they "Overprinted" their revalued "Overprinted" stamps with another "Overprint". Talk about inflation, wow.

  • @konigvonpreuen8065
    @konigvonpreuen8065 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ya

  • @mkayultra3738
    @mkayultra3738 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In terms of the de facto insolvency is he referring to being politically insolvent i.e. total lack of trust or confidence?

    • @mkayultra3738
      @mkayultra3738 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or is it the absolute value of the balance sheet relative to other cb balance sheets? Fiat balance sheets😅?

    • @AdventurerPrimefire
      @AdventurerPrimefire หลายเดือนก่อน

      The central bank accumulates bad debt that the government can no longer pay back with good money. After eliminating the government bonds on the bank's balance sheet the purchasing power of its assets no longer can support the reserves of the financial system, so it needs new equity capital to support the purchasing power at a new price and deposit level.

  • @Weetorp
    @Weetorp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ja? Ja? Right? Ja?

  • @nicolas393
    @nicolas393 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ya? ya! ya? ya? ya

  • @RoyReyes
    @RoyReyes 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    price at rest 5% float strong buy. :)
    do not pass around

  • @modelmark
    @modelmark หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Inflation is always caused by money creation. There is no such thing as push or pull or raw material caused inflation.

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Obviously, you somehow missed the point in this discussion. Inflation is not caused by money creation. There is no one "money". That's why Friedman's "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" pearl of wisdom had turned to ash (or perhaps excrement).

    • @modelmark
      @modelmark 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @velisvideos6208 so you print 1000 trillion dollar and throw it out of helicopters, it doesn't create inflation? Because money printing doesn't create inflation. And I somehow missed the point

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, you are right, you somehow missed the point..."Money" however it is defined, does not cause high inflation. Rampant over-demand might do so (ref theUS federal deficits at present). Sauer's argument is that a central bank's insolvency will cause hyperinflation because currency users will try to escape by swapping to foreign currencies (eg Argentina). This seems correct to me because I would behave like that myself. If you don't, good luck.

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And, to be exact, there have never been any helicopters throwing out money in our neighbourhood. It may be different where you live, but somehow I have my doubts.

    • @modelmark
      @modelmark 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@velisvideos6208 it's called a hypothetical, to test a theory

  • @12javierhernandez
    @12javierhernandez หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just imagine for a moment comparing Argentina to europe... Look at the liabilities of the treasuries + ecb vs total wealth in europe... Common be serious...

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It isn't a question of size, but long term policies (internal and external). Europe can become a giant Argentina, if we will it to be.

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@velisvideos6208 Likewise Argentina can return to being a G-7 nation as it was 100 years ago. Argentina is resource rich and reasonably productive, but productivity is bled off by a bloated government sector.

  • @kk-xj5oz
    @kk-xj5oz หลายเดือนก่อน

    Inflation is the devaluation of the currency. True inflation is minimum 10% Year

    • @pedroabreu1754
      @pedroabreu1754 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly, i allways say, 10% average of the s&p500 is just the inflation adjusted of the holding assets

  • @AI-art-makers
    @AI-art-makers หลายเดือนก่อน

    So it's basically 2008 all again possibly

  • @janeznovak7589
    @janeznovak7589 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He is typical German. "We are not even one nation". We have one currency union, and have common obligation. California is not a country! California does not pay for military, but Greece does, so Germany can pay less. Greece has obligation as a country! This is why it need assistance from ECB. Germany wanted cheap labor, faster trade among European nation with Euro, preferable access to markets. You ate our lunch, now pay for it! Poland does not have € and is doing fine. So does Denmark. So does Czech and others. Without € only country being way worse would be Germany itself.

    • @velisvideos6208
      @velisvideos6208 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is an interesting comment. Certainly, as a currency union we do have a common obligations. Nevertheless, if Greece spends 3.5% of her GDP on defence, it does not directly follow that Germany or anybody else can spend less. This is in fact a salient point: in the US, the federal government is responsible for the external heavy items, like defence, foreign relations, foreign assistance etc. In the EU, these are predominantly national responsibilities. Defence oblications in Europe come predominantly from NATO, which includes almost all EU members, and a couple of non-EU members. Still, personally, I would advocate for minimum EU defence obligations in addition to NATO. We must be strong together, with or without the US.

  • @1ntrcnnctr608
    @1ntrcnnctr608 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BTC$1M2030, then 1 BTC = 1 BTC (goes to 0, but not really)

    • @philiscoolerthanu
      @philiscoolerthanu หลายเดือนก่อน

      The definition of inflation is the expansion of money and credit
      Nothing more
      Nothing less

    • @1ntrcnnctr608
      @1ntrcnnctr608 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philiscoolerthanuinflation = expansion? sounds like doublespeak. gud thing money n credit can be created out of nothing ad infinitum - sounds fair 👍

  • @buy.to.let.britain
    @buy.to.let.britain หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    move 10% of your savings into solid gold coins and take physical delivery / custody of them.
    then go back to sleep. you are safe.

    • @nattoe
      @nattoe หลายเดือนก่อน

      buy bitcoin, gold is old man's rock

    • @buy.to.let.britain
      @buy.to.let.britain หลายเดือนก่อน

      sure kid. you are going to go far !!@@nattoe

  • @geoffwitt4227
    @geoffwitt4227 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Every country's IRS is treated as the enemy. Very little taxes get paid.

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      100 years ago the US government relied mostly on customs and duties to pay their national bills, so this was not an issue. It's only when governments outstrip their mandates either through carrying out war or increasing the size of the welfare state that they have to institute an "IRS". Even the alcohol (excise) taxes imposed since the late 1700s were hated and resisted.

  • @user-wj7cv9hb5j
    @user-wj7cv9hb5j 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Lol the government wouldn't just take an asset... wow dude you dont know the history of the us government going back just 50 years 😂😂😂😂 ill not listen to your advice 😂😂😂

    • @JScottHamilton
      @JScottHamilton 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The US confiscated private gold holdings, and Argentina confiscated dollars from dollar denominated accounts held in country by foreign banks. Even the "takings clause" of the US Constitution is routinely violated.

  • @ericfrith6358
    @ericfrith6358 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love when people talk about hyperinflation. Lets me know in advance they're either an idiot or a scam artist.

    • @johnfarley1212
      @johnfarley1212 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You think that applies here? He’s done the work to merit your respect

    • @ericfrith6358
      @ericfrith6358 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johnfarley1212 I stand corrected; was not expecting a scholar. Usually (not on your show particularly, but just in general) I find it's a lot of investors and pundits who are wildly irresponsible and ill-informed about what hyperinflation actually is, and what causes it; they're just looking to stoke panic and shill some crypto or gold. My mistake for judging book by headline, in this case; usually it's the right bet.

    • @nattoe
      @nattoe หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      says an idiot lol

    • @BlockworksHQ
      @BlockworksHQ  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hi@@ericfrith6358, thank you for being open-minded. I agree with you that often people who talk about hyperinflation are quacks - this is why I so vigorously defended Ingo against your initial comment.
      -Jack (JohnFarley was my personal account)

  • @Walker956
    @Walker956 หลายเดือนก่อน

    drink everytime he says "ja". lol